Congratulations Murad on finishing your English translation of the Qur'an. Thank you for bringing this book 'more to life' for those of us from the English speaking world!

Well done Murad….a mighty work and will look forward to reading the fruits of your endeavours. Thank you.

www.buymeacoffee.com/saintmurad/

Happy Easter everyone! And congratulations to saint murad on finishing his translation. It is so fitting that murad’s work also ended on Easter because this will unlock a better evangelization against Islam

I missed the stream 😢 Congratulations Murad! You have done a great service to humanity 🎉

Superb work, Murad! Amazing, and much needed. I still have questions and hope you will do more talks. You are welcome to speak about this on my channel at any time. I'm curious about the shift from Meccan to Medinan suras, and what you noticed. Also, the loan words that Jeffrey wrote about, 2000+ of them.

@sasa_sasa_sasa230

3 ай бұрын

Loyd do you have link with this Hadiths of Muhammad?

Congratulations Saint Murad for Non Bracket Quran completion, Happy Easter to everyone 😊

Jewish connection: highly probable because initially, it was Jews and Arabs against Christians

Christ is risen!!

@gregoryfischer7870

3 ай бұрын

He has risen indeef

I've just recovered from a terrible flu which means I missed this live but BOY am I excited to hear this news! Brother Murad, I want to be first in line to purchase the full set!

Shut up and take my money!!! 💰 💰 💸

Wonderful, but we could really use time stamps or a summary on this one. Many of us just don't have 2+ hours to spare to watch one video. I had to skim through this. Great that Murad finished his English translation of the Qur'an. It's on my list of books I must have.

@IslamicOrigins

3 ай бұрын

I will try and do that tomorrow..

@mysotiras21

3 ай бұрын

@@IslamicOrigins , thank you!

I would LOVE to see the concordance made available also...

Yemeni was a major component of the early Muslim settlers in Spain. Zammit, M. R. (2009-2010). Andalusi Arabic and Maltese : a preliminary survey. Folia Orientalia, (45-46), 21-60.

@TheLinguist601

3 ай бұрын

I would like to refer to my video with Mel on this channel "A critical re-analysis of Quranic diction: rabb, hadu, and mḥmd" I find both in previous and current research that a Sabaic (lexical) reading, almost always yields a better reading. Even when the word is also used in Ancient North Arabian, Nabatean Aramaic, and/or Jewish-Babylonian-Aramaic, the Sabaic meaning (usually) fits better. The early Muslim scholars thought that the Yemeni had a more original and stronger "Arabic". Which is obviously not true, since they spoke a different language (i.e. Sabaic). But it is pointing in the same direction. The Judaic base components of Islam imho are Himyaritic in nature. Even the synagogues of the Arabs, masjids are named after the synagogues of the Himyarites - and Ethiopians - 'msgd'. AJ's analysis of Surah Al-Fil (105), and the historical Ethiopian invasion of Himyar all support this line of reasoning. Texts sometimes have a double meanings, that are not directly apparent. Going through the Hebrew, Aramaic, etc meanings sometimes reveals those gems. The writer(s) must have been multilingual to pull that off.

@LloydDeJongh

3 ай бұрын

​@TheLinguist601 That is an intriguing, very interesting analysis. Thought-provoking to say the least, and in line with my thoughts on this.

@TheLinguist601

3 ай бұрын

@@LloydDeJongh Your analysis yielded a similar result. But it is sometimes hard to tell if the Yemeni words should be understood in a pagan or Judeo-Christian context. The Himyarites, both Jews and Christians were more willing to use pagan language, than others. Maybe because the majority were late converts? Quick question, have you come across the use of a double-amen in early Muslim sources? As in '... amen and amen' , or '... amen, amen'.

@LloydDeJongh

3 ай бұрын

@@TheLinguist601 That is interesting ... this double amen. I suspect I have, but would have to go back and check my sources. Typically "Ameen, ameen", I would think

@letsmapdialects5248

2 ай бұрын

@@TheLinguist601 so Himyarite and Ethopian Jews called their synagogues masjids? Apparently even in Malta synagogues were called masjids as well (there is a notarial act of 1537 which called a field as "ta' misged" (i.e. of misjed). Prof. Wettinger concluded that the field "ta' misged" meant that it belonged to the synagogue in Mdina, Malta). ----------------------------------------------- In an article by Prof Wettinger, the Muslim commander that attacked Malta was Habashi son of Umar. Habashi i.e. Abyssinian.

Thank you Murad, for these insights! Would you confirm the statement that the Quran is not the basis of Islam. Whatever the basis is.

Happy Easter! Can't wait for Murad's translation! Well done!

In street Arabic Taghoot is used for Tyrant

Amazing effort! Congrats Murad 👍 I wonder what about other versions of Quran, not the Hafs one that I assumed you had used, would they be matter to be compared with?

Murad should also compare the Hafs with the Qiraat that are supposed to be earlier like Ibn Amir and Ibn Katheer(not the tafsir). Maybe for the one with Aramaic words.

How do I buy this translation?

Hot potato in 1:07:19 deed!😂

@IslamicOrigins

3 ай бұрын

Lol.

What makes no sense is when they bombed Yemen to hide Islams roots and artifacts to connect Islam sin to them, yet they forgot to bomb the Kaaba in Mecca Yemini corner stone which connects them anyway.

Mute your yt when Murad is speaking echoes come deliberately . There used to be 6666 Aya, thank goodness it was burned, less work. Great stream God bless you all.

According to Arthur Jeffery there are about 24 Sanskrit, 2 Tamil and 2 Malayalam words in the Quran. I wonder how you translated these words.

@TingTong2568

3 ай бұрын

This is weird claim

@anwingm

3 ай бұрын

Malayalam did not exist at the time the Quran was compiled.

@CargoCrew-kx8sv

3 ай бұрын

Arsh is a Sanskrit word

@TingTong2568

3 ай бұрын

@@CargoCrew-kx8sv what does that word mean in sanskrit?

@CargoCrew-kx8sv

3 ай бұрын

@@TingTong2568 i think it means some exalted place above

I am not sure what Loyed is trying to do but too much reading is sure taking a toll on him he started out good and now he is all over Congratulations Murad and thanks Mel

@LloydDeJongh

3 ай бұрын

I'm not sure what you're trying to do, but ignorance is not truth, even if it is comforting. Would you like to present evidence proving me wrong, using good sources, or are you anti-intellectual now and denying that reading has value?

@LloydDeJongh

3 ай бұрын

Even better, let's do this live, with you getting all your evidence handy, and then you can impress everyone. Then you can also take the time to demonstrate why the evidence I have is all false because it hurts your feelings, or whatever.

@LloydDeJongh

3 ай бұрын

Oh, it's spelled "Lloyd". I think all the facts and evidence I have presented are taking a toll on you.

@LloydDeJongh

2 ай бұрын

Coffee Cup, were you just talking smack without ability to prove your case? It's not Christian to lie or slander, and I am sure you can't prove me wrong in a live discussion on my evidence. You're a coward, likely unable to prove me wrong, and yet willing to lie in public. When do you want to do this live stream to prove me wrong?

@LloydDeJongh

2 ай бұрын

Yep, you have nothing, and don't have the balls to do this live, nor the evidence. Typical.

If i may suggest something: a lot of people wishing to use the concept of abrogation against the Muslims would be helped if murad also included in his translation, the sequential ordering of the surahs and verses in chronological order. This way it is easier to show which surahs are abrogated by which surahs and verses.

Regarding "the shroud"... Begin an Aspy, I'm pretty black and white when it comes to my thinking... So if the Bible really IS reliable and true, then IT'S descriptions of what Jesus would have looked like at his death and burial don't match up with the image on "the shroud"... So, which one is correct? I have to go with the Bible. That's not too suggest "the shroud" want used for another contemporaneous individual... It just can't be Jesus.

@LloydDeJongh

2 ай бұрын

Or you have a poor interpretation of the description of Jesus from the Bible, and the shroud is accurate. The Bible does not give a detailed physical description of Jesus' appearance during his time on earth. The key points are: - The Bible is generally indifferent to describing Jesus' physical appearance before his death. There are no descriptions of his height, weight, hair colour, eye colour, or other physical features[1][2][5]. - The only biblical reference to his appearance is in Isaiah 53:2, which states that Jesus "had no stately form or majesty" and no "appearance that we should be attracted to him" - suggesting he was not physically impressive or handsome[2][3][5]. - Most scholars agree Jesus likely looked like a typical Jewish man of his time and place - standing around 5'5" tall, with olive-brown skin, brown eyes, and short, dark hair[1][2][3]. - The Gospels indicate Jesus was recognized as a Jewish man and could blend into crowds, suggesting he did not have any striking or unusual physical features[1][2][3]. - Later Christian traditions and artistic depictions have portrayed Jesus in various ways, but these are not based on biblical descriptions[4]. In summary, the Bible does not provide a detailed physical description of Jesus, only indicating that he had a typical, unremarkable appearance as a 1st century Jewish man. The focus is on his spiritual identity and mission, not his outward physical attributes[1][2][5]. Citations: [1] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus [2] www.gotquestions.org/Jesus-look-like.html [3] www.bibleinfo.com/en/questions/what-did-jesus-look-like [4] www.agapebiblestudy.com/documents/Jesus_What%20did%20He%20look%20like%20.htm [5] www.neverthirsty.org/bible-qa/qa-archives/question/what-was-jesus-physical-appearance/

@LloydDeJongh

2 ай бұрын

From Catholic sources: The Gospels do not provide a detailed physical description of Jesus. "there is no trustworthy tradition concerning the bodily appearance of Jesus." Your idea of what Jesus looked like is based on your imagination, and is at odds with the Bible.

@LloydDeJongh

2 ай бұрын

The Gospels do not provide a definitive physical description of Jesus. However, there are some references to his appearance in the Bible. In the book of Isaiah, there is a prophecy that describes the Messiah as having "no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him" (Isaiah 53:2). This suggests that Jesus may not have had a particularly striking or impressive physical appearance. In the New Testament, there is a brief description of Jesus in the book of Revelation, where he is described as having hair white as wool and eyes like blazing fire (Revelation 1:14-15). This is a symbolic description meant to convey Jesus' divine authority and power, rather than a literal physical description. Overall, the Bible does not focus on Jesus' physical appearance, as his true significance lies in his teachings, actions, and ultimate sacrifice on the cross.

@VashtiWood

2 ай бұрын

@@LloydDeJongh that sounds like a "you problem" as my teens would say .. You've assumed I'm talking about the new testament. I'd encourage you to get off your high horse and read the whole Bible. 😍🤣😉 There are MANY descriptions (physical) of the Messiah...

@LloydDeJongh

2 ай бұрын

@@VashtiWood That sounds like a deflection, and rejection of basic facts, as anyone honest would say. I suggest you present evidence of Jesus physical description that you claim, else admit you are inventing myths to suit your private beliefs. If there are MANY descriptions, how do you personally know which one is correct? And why didn't you list one accurate one? Simple, because you're asserting an opinion with little to no evidence. I encourage you to lie a little bit less, and not make up stories like an Abdul.