I didn’t think there would be such a big difference. I’m sold! Thank you! 🙏

@seymourecarnage

Жыл бұрын

I didn't either. Thanks for watching and commenting!

One of the best illustrations I've seen of the difference DxO makes to Fujifilm RAWs. Thank you.

@seymourecarnage

Жыл бұрын

Just wait. I am dropping a PureRaw 3 Vs CaptureOne video in the next 24 hours!

@seymourecarnage

Жыл бұрын

My Capture One vs DxO review is up. Check it out! kzread.info/dash/bejne/mp6gyqarnN2qZqg.html

¡Wuouh! Interesante. Aunque estoy muy acostumbrado a usar CO, no deja de ser una buena opción. ¿Qué tal procesa Darktable los RAF de Fuji? Saludos

@seymourecarnage

Жыл бұрын

Gracias. No he usado DT, así que no sé cómo se compara.

I use Capture One for my Fuji files. Mostly because I can access all the film simulations and apply them to the RAW files if I wanted to. I'll give this one a try.

@seymourecarnage

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, if you pre-process with this, or use it within LR you will still be able to apply the Fuji Sims.

@normanq1206

Жыл бұрын

@@seymourecarnage Definitely does a great job at removing noise from my low-light images.

@seymourecarnage

Жыл бұрын

@@normanq1206 Agreed. This will definitely save me a trip to Topaz Denoise in many cases.

@seymourecarnage

Жыл бұрын

Hey Norman. My comparison between PureRAW and Capture one is up. Check it out! kzread.info/dash/bejne/mp6gyqarnN2qZqg.html

Does it have a batch mode? Let it sit overnight grinding away for treating more files than you would manually?

@seymourecarnage

Жыл бұрын

It wouldn't take that long, unless you had a lot of files. But yes, I only demoed a single file but you can batch process as well. Given that the file size of the DNGs that it outputs will be 2-3 times the size of the RAWs it would fill up space really quick. That's why I suggest doing it in LR, post-cull.

I used to use the enhance feature within Lightroom on every photo but that just creates sooo many 100mb DNGs. I then switched to Capture One which immediately loads the photo without worms and with less noise while staying sharp. I assume PureRaw 2 is still a little bit better?

@seymourecarnage

Жыл бұрын

The DNGs that PureRaw 2 output were 60-120mb as well. That's why suggested doing the conversion on your choice shots in the filmstrip in LR while editing, rather than just batch converting your whole import beforehand. That would take up a lot of time and space. I'm not sure if PhotoLab6 would work the same as CaptureOne in this case or not. I believe DxO has a demo of PL6 as well. If you decide to try it out let me know!

@llIlllllIll

Жыл бұрын

@@seymourecarnage I think PhotoLab needs to do the same especially with the AI mode. The workflow slows me down too much and with Capturs One every photo will be cured from worms, so I guess I'll stay with that

@seymourecarnage

Жыл бұрын

If you're using Capture One I think you'll find my latest video interesting. kzread.info/dash/bejne/mp6gyqarnN2qZqg.html

first