I'm so tired of hearing that Amber is being "demonized", no one is demonizing her, she demonized herself.

@igordasunddas3377

2 жыл бұрын

She's a demon and thus people just recognize her for what she is.

@equatorialjourney4478

2 жыл бұрын

Of COURSE she is being demonised . She was demonised EVERY SINGLE DAY of this trial , simply by the ridiculous daily circus outside court; .the biased fans inside the court and the TV coverage . She could have been mother Theresa , and STILL would have been mocked, pilloried, relentlessly meme’d , Tik tokked and social media bashed, simply bc she was up against capt Jack Sparrow . Had the judge done one scintilla of research into his social media bias ; vigilante fan popularity , she should NEVER have allowed cameras or fans into the court room . Cant do anything ab the daily zoo and circus outside ( literally , w damn alpacas and Jack Sparrow costumes … abs ludicrous daily circus ) A total travesty of justice and prejudicial from the beginning to allow cameras in . A shambolic trial which was tarnished from the beginning ....unless the jury could be sequestered , given the extraordinary public bias , it should NOT have been a trial by jury . T

@dickysaputra9005

2 жыл бұрын

yes exactly right, even amber blaming everyone, The Cop, The Doctor, All the witnesses, and today she said she is demonized? the fact is amber demonizes all the people including the judge and the jury.

@CJAmara

2 жыл бұрын

She’s the demon

@therealdeal3672

2 жыл бұрын

Can you demonize a demon? LOL

Elaine is so low. I used to empathize with her for having a bad client, but at this point, she is just an extension of Amber Heard. Dishonest, gas lighting, bigoted, manipulative, and just plain incompetant.

@PrairieeGirl

2 жыл бұрын

I agree. I felt sorry for her because she was in an impossible situation with Amber as a client. I'm appalled at her behavior now. She's so unprofessional and out of touch with reality, similar to Amber. She knew Amber got caught lying multiple times. I have to wonder if she is just doing this for her own 15 minutes of fame. She's insulting the judge, the jury and basically all of America, like we can't hear and see the evidence for ourselves. The jury saw it like everyone else. They didn't believe her. The one juror said that by the time she was talking the story of her dog stepping on a bee, he knew she was pulling stories out of the air. He also said they did not like how she was staring at the jury throughout the trial. Elaine needs to get a grip.

@NatlovesJesus1

2 жыл бұрын

@@PrairieeGirl that wasn't a real juror. They can't speak publicly for 21 days. And that's if they choose to. I'm not sure who that guy was but he's not be truthful himself

@jrjr9358

2 жыл бұрын

The legal system is broken, but that's beside the point ... "harmless error", etc., but 90 percent of cases reversed on appeal and get retried come out with the opposite result -- that's how devastating a judge's rulings are ... but let's look at just a couple rulings/items: 1. Allowing in Settlement Negotiations made by Heard's lawyer in her divorce case. Will lawyers anywhere be able to try to settle cases in the future knowing that all their settlement communications may be used against their clients? 2. Failing to pay charity pledges. Unbelievable. 3. When Depp's able lawyers (superior and better connected than Heard's, obviously. Who pro hoc viced them? And where did they find their experts? and Heard's team their "experts"? Did her lawyers have much trial experience? Didn't appear so. I had a lousy expert once and when you have one you lose.) ... When his able lawyers claimed Heard had recently made up false claims, don't her 2012 statements to therapists have to come in? 4. Lots more, but I don't have time for this and would need to see the records anyway, and jury instructions. What did you think of the judge's jury instructions counsel? And isn't this just all a story of the richer and more powerful winning? Didn't Ruppert Murdock's company/paper win in London? And Depp won here. Is it just a matter of us English speakers having the best justice system money can buy? (Oh, and it's obvious to me that Depp's "PR people" paid trolls to stoke the social media fire (and I am sure there are some "organic" ones too. that's what happens when you have a lot of money creating that and such a popular figure as Depp. I love lots of his work. I didn't know who she was until this trial, but it does appear she's being picked on. Oh, and what is the required analysis in Virginia to allow cameras in the courtroom. That seems a very poor decision by this jurist who appeared unqualified to handle such a case. What do you think?

@vesnakostic2327

2 жыл бұрын

So true!!!

@chicawhappa

2 жыл бұрын

@@jrjr9358 The jury instructions were debated and agreed upon by both lawyer teams with the judge ON CAMERA. They had plenty of chances to object, and both sides did voice their objections and make modifications which he judge accepted/noted. Those are the jury instructions which were read out and explained to the jury. There's no issue there, since both legal teams cooked up the instructions together on the final afternoon. This was livestreamed.. so.. Second, the reason the court decided to livestream was, the "thronging crowds" that would show up in support of either plaintiff or defendant, since both are famous and this is a hotbed issue (DV victims/ believe all women/ me-too focus etc). To avoid that, the court *proposed* putting cameras in the proceedings, and Depp's team agreed, and Heard's team initially opposed, but had to accept because they could not give a convincing argument as to why not. Despite the livestreaming, the room was packed daily, with hundreds spending the night on the sidewalk just to get a seat and many more hanging about the premises the entire 6 weeks. This case was more than fair, because everything Heard's doctors reports say, SHE told them. There is however, no record of any doctor visit that shows she was treated for any form of physical assault. So what exactly did Elaine want to reintroduce, when it has already been rejected as hearsay? If Depp had medical records or other chats etc where he is TELLING someone, this happened that happened then amber hit me etc, it would also not be accepted as "evidence". At the very least, the doctor notes should mention the bruises / hernias etc, or the friend has pix or made comments like "omfg what happened to you!!" Or published something to someone somewhere closer to that time, that they had witnessed such injuries or acts. None of that stuff is there. Now, for 6 years or atleast some of that time, everyone believed Amber's version of events. Because we all know "pix or it didn't happen" does not and should not apply to DV situations. So what hurt Amber's case? Quite simply, her own recordings. They are what clued everyone in to what a crazy and aggressive person she is, and that mostly Depp was just trying to gtfo of there, not hitting her over very long and shouting arguments. Not in one of those hours and hours of vitriolic arguments, recorded - sometimes secretly - by HER, is there any evidence of him physically lashing out or there being any threat of that happening. This combined with her strange acting on the stand, wherein she can turn the crying face/voice on and off like a faucet, every time there was an interruption, clued us and the jury in to the fact that she is not really traumatized but pretending that she is. Human beings are not idiots. We and the jury people make atleast 10-15 decisions daily, about the veracity and credibility of what is being said/ done/sold/offered. As adults we are well-practiced on the art of instinctual reading of body language non-verbal and verbal/visual clues. All this factors into our decision making. If she had left well enough done alone, she would have several million in her account with nobody asking questions, a role in a successful movie franchise, a lucrative endorsement contract, and v probably more to come simply on the strength of good old hard work. But she already got a VERY GOOD START. She should have left it alone, but she couldn't. Either her abusive desire to bully and make her victim squirm & suffer even more for her sadistic enjoyment, or her pragmatic wish to promote her Aquaman movie in 2018 was a decisive factor in her choosing to write and publish that defaming op-ed. Neither is a "noble motivation", to speak for DV victims.

The perpetrator and abuser is DESPERATELY trying to take the role of the victim. I find it disgusting.

@irenecarriere9420

2 жыл бұрын

KARMA

@susien7323

2 жыл бұрын

She is not gonna be able to hold her composure and she’s going to flip out and attack someone. TMZ will probably catch it without a tip. She destroyed her own career. I would not wanna be her sister. Ick

I’m a lawyer and you sir have just explained Appeals much better than I could. This is an excellent video.

Elaine also refuses to state that Johnny had a lot of evidence not allowed in the UK trial 😂😭😂😭

@reginafetty6374

2 жыл бұрын

Plus the fact that Depp's characterization of AH was untrue because she donated the 7 million, which she lied about in court, by what I understand, which helped cause him to lose the case. The money she didn't donate.

@omnifx

2 жыл бұрын

Actually that is true. There are articles online stating that Robert Palmer son of Andrew Nichols worked for TalkRadio, Rupert Muduck (Murdoch) owner of TalkRadio sister company of the Sun. Robert was involved with the person who wrote the article about Johnny being a WB. It is stated a lot of evidence for JD was not allowed by judge nincompoop, even I witness testimonies that would have won the case for JD. The judge for the UK trial was corrupt. Elaine needs to do some investigating herself.

@katicat7580

2 жыл бұрын

LITERALLY !!! they’re crazy

@susien7323

2 жыл бұрын

Ever get the feeling that Elaine is in fear of getting her ass kicked by Amber?. She’s probably on that press junket since she lost. I’m sure Amber handed her her ass and sent her out there. And I’m sure she’s going to pledge the money owed to her attorneys, it is the same thing right?

@Kari.F.

Жыл бұрын

Of course she can't state that. She seems to have a very casual relationship with the truth, and the truth doesn't align with the narrative Elaine is out there spinning for her lying liar of a client. I wonder if Elaine thinks she can charm people with her sulky, sour, poor loser act...?

Elaine is still defaming Johnny--- still calling Amber a "domestic abuse survivor"---- She better be careful or she's going to have her on defamation charges against her by Johnny's Lawyers

@pumalogo204

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah so true,,,I think that is why Elaine was a no show for Court Tv...she was suppose to be ,,,,,but cancelled at the last minute

@sk8ercaligirl

2 жыл бұрын

@ A E .. I would enjoy watching that. Elaine is delusional and she lies. Depp sued The Sun over an article that accused Depp of being a wife beater. Amber was only a witness. Secondly, the jury awarded $2 million to AH… does that sound like AH was “demonized?" Elaine can't see Amber’s lies and malice “demonized” all hope of winning this trial.

@divineordergovernsmylife808

2 жыл бұрын

I do not think they care. The world knows who AH and Elaine are.

@babkeebabkus8177

2 жыл бұрын

believe me she has benefactors...billionaire psycho elites ain't gonna let this slide because it ruins their agenda of woman over man...expect a retrial organized by way of bribed judge and original verdict reversed by bribed jurors...now the big dogs are playing

@susien7323

2 жыл бұрын

Thankfully he’s above that. It’s all white noise

If she’s successful in getting an appeal the whole thing would become even more ludicrous than it already is.

@ieattofu68

2 жыл бұрын

She would simply embarrass herself even more....

@bmfrisdon

2 жыл бұрын

@@ieattofu68 can she ?? Really?? 🥹

Elaine: “the jury looked at social media” Amber while she was testifying on the stand looks at the jury and says “look me up!!”

@tonyachristensen3422

2 жыл бұрын

Her buddy Eve got kicked out of court for being online. Then she would tweet and Rottenborn would say the samething she tweeted. So they were the ones online

@ShushIt

2 жыл бұрын

Ambers team calling an expert to talk about Twitter and #JusticeForJohnnyDepp #AmberHeardIsAnAbuser. You can't make this up.

@vla287

2 жыл бұрын

Also Amber on the stand “Getting death threats daily-threats to her kid”. How would she know if she’s supposed to be off social media too.

@ShushIt

2 жыл бұрын

@@vla287 the way she fixed her testimony after the 1 week break after everyone pointed out her inconsistencies and straight up lies 😂 we all noticed Amber

@ComradeCommissarYuri

2 жыл бұрын

@@vla287 I think her team were allo to view social media just not post

Depp’s team didn’t need to demonise her. She put herself on the stand (twice!) and did that herself.

@doonewatts7155

2 жыл бұрын

And of course her team didn't defame and demonise Johnny - not

@funningames2243

2 жыл бұрын

It was like listening to a Partridge Family album backwards! "Beelzebub is my lord and savior and his will be done."

@TheBrothergreen

2 жыл бұрын

The hypocrisy of claiming that depp attempted to demonize *her* is astounding.

@funningames2243

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheBrothergreen indubitabably!

@funningames2243

2 жыл бұрын

@@elephantintheroom5678 that taint no win! It's a megawin complete with megapliers! I'm sure there are other movies you and your imaginary friends can go see. None with AH , but hey, it's something.

She’s accusing the jury of MISCONDUCT. This team of lawyers, and Elaine in particular, are just like AH, BLAME OTHERS.

@ShortiesCleverShorts

2 жыл бұрын

Just like their client

@XI24

2 жыл бұрын

True

@MilenaKoncar

2 жыл бұрын

EXACTLY WHAT I SAID IN MY COMMENT! Same petsonality disorder. They believe their own lies and its never their fault

@mharsacopla2459

2 жыл бұрын

Birds of the same feather flock together

@michaels8386

2 жыл бұрын

@@mharsacopla2459 Yes, exactly!

She lost me for good when she called into question the integrity of the jurors. Why are you even an attorney if you don't believe in the system? Gross.

@Noname-hs5lx

2 жыл бұрын

No the jurors were gross. Incompetent too. Had to be sent back.

@annemary9680

2 жыл бұрын

@@Noname-hs5lx Narcissists and liars defend other narcissists and liars like Amber and her attorney...

@-First-Last

2 жыл бұрын

@@Noname-hs5lx Why ? Name one thing.

@JayeEllis

2 жыл бұрын

@@Noname-hs5lx Tell me you didn't watch the trial without telling me you didn't watch the trial. The jurors did their job, and did it well. I'm willing to bet they were sent back because they didn't know they actually had to write 'zero' in the spot for her punitive damages. They weren't gone long enough to deliberate a dollar amount.

@emilylee9894

2 жыл бұрын

Jurors violate their true duties every day. They should have been sequestered and should have not fallen asleep and should have understood that they were to consider and submit a judgement amount from the beginning (sic).

She was a poor lawyer in court, she's even worse outside of it. Blame everyone else for the loss while accepting no responsibility for her poor choice in taking on Heard as a client and the subsequent loss. Much in common with her client.

@lauralemarrec7606

2 жыл бұрын

👏👏👏

@susien7323

2 жыл бұрын

Just keep thinking of Elaine holding up that make up kit the bruise kit and her just driving home the fact that that’s what she always carried in her purse. My God you don’t you feel like an ass by now Elaine??

@sarahr1235

Жыл бұрын

Go home Elaine! Elon musk was friends with The Judge in UK. Always buying people Elon. He tried it in Fairfax, Va. he could not buy the Jury this time. Justice For Johnny! Go home Elaine, take the liar with you!

The whole world was jury. And we ruled AH a big fat liar.

@karlasosa372

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly

@mzzzlucas4536

2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely correct, there were at least half a MILLION jurors in this trial (people that watched ALL of the testimonies and saw ALL of the evidence presented). We ALL concluded that Johnny was telling the truth and that Amber was lying !!! Definitely a FAIR trial !!

Amber won in UK? She wasn't the defendant though. Elaine is not being truthful.

@justtubing2228

2 жыл бұрын

UK lawyer is say because she stated in her after loosing US STATMENT "We won in the UK" Johnny more than not has a reason for UK Appeal, because she was only a witness, not a party of

@antoniomarcos5321

2 жыл бұрын

I was thinking about that, too.

@killerrabbit2693

2 жыл бұрын

@@stingcool9455 Eh? JD is IN THE UK RIGHT NOW. And how is the uk a failed state lol.

@sencrew5293

2 жыл бұрын

@@killerrabbit2693 The justice system in the uk is backwards. People can get away with abuse there.

@AprilDaniel

2 жыл бұрын

And the judge was biased to Amber

it makes me flipping sick that she is accusing the jury of misconduct. this must be addressed.

I don't know how Elaine doesn't feel embarrassed after her work in court. Awful professional, she did not even know how to ask the witnesses without being objected again and again by Camille Vásquez. Now she's running around the media crying that they weren't given a chance, and that Amber was demonized.

@winstongordon9694

2 жыл бұрын

Amber is the one who demonized herself by lying on the stand and snitching on herself lol....

@JoseHTiano

2 жыл бұрын

@@winstongordon9694 I agree!

@Ysckemia

2 жыл бұрын

"i tried, i tried!"

To me, Elaine isn’t a proper attorney who is doing her lawful job - but a petty enabler and an accomplice of an abuser. So, zero sympathy from me. 👎🏼

@1mol831

2 жыл бұрын

I hope Amber tries to sue the jury and loses.

@Uncle_Samn

2 жыл бұрын

She's doing perfect as an attorney, she'll only rest once Amber is bankrupt! That's what attorneys do

@catherinehubbard1167

2 жыл бұрын

So true. You said it so I don’t need to. What I want to know is how this corrupt PR campaign is being bankrolled and whether the same source(s) would pay for an appeal.

@taxiuniversum

2 жыл бұрын

@@Uncle_Samn I don’t believe that she is representative of „all attorneys“. You have different character types in almost any profession - and I am sure the same applies to attorneys. She is at the appalling end of the spectrum.

@ConfederateDixieDarling

2 жыл бұрын

You cannot sue the jury.

Judge Penney strikes me as someone who does NOT make errors in her position. She’s experienced, even keeled, and plays by the book.

@timshelton7905

2 жыл бұрын

All judges make errors. All. Were any in this case reversible? We shall see.

I don’t think she’s gonna want to appeal this to a higher circuit. They will slap her with perjury if she keeps her lies up. The higher the court , the more serious they take your claims and expect you to tell the truth.

@charlottemason7998

2 жыл бұрын

Then let's hope she's dumb enough to do that to herself

@MsCaryopteris

Жыл бұрын

Why wasn’t she charged with perjury already?

@Goldengirl48

Жыл бұрын

@@MsCaryopteris That is the best question yet! The only reason I can see is AH and team keep dangling this appeal over the court's head. I believe that the judge wants give them enough rope to hang themselves. These lies and insinuations will come back to bite them on the behind. AH and Elaine are digging a really big deep hole and they may end up getting adjoining cell! Elaine needs to be more careful or she could lose her license.

SHE NEEDS TO RESPECT THE JURY DECISION!!!! THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NOT THE UNITED STATES OF AMBER HEARD JUST BECAUSE SHE DOESN'T LIKE THE JURY DOESN'T MAKE THEM WRONG!!!! IF SHE WON SHE WOULDN'T APPEAL ANYTHING IF SHE APPEAL SHE WILL OWE JOHNNY MORE MONEY!!!! THE JURY DID THEIR JOB!!!!!

@taffypie

2 жыл бұрын

I love your comment and I'm not even American . I thought the verdict was just and fair. Elaine needs to turn her microphone off !

@marilynmonroe2831

Жыл бұрын

@@taffypie AGREED EXACTLY 💯👏🏽

Correction Elaine, AMBER did not win in the UK case….“The Sun” did. The difference in this case vs. UK, is that Johnny actually got a fair trial here, AND the public got to see it all first hand, unfiltered.

@JDAfrica

2 жыл бұрын

Defamation cases against press are almost never won … as you cannot prove malice or them knowing that it was false. They can hide behind “it was a developing story” or “these were the facts we understood at the time” What was interesting - the UK trial did force testimony under oath, which allowed Depps team to prepare effectively, and use each witnesses deposition/story to impeach each witness. Clever legal strategy - make amber reveal all her evidence ahead of time.

@chael9323

2 жыл бұрын

Also I believe the Judge's son has interests invested in The Sun, hence the more favorable ruling for The Sun

@deuxexkane2659

2 жыл бұрын

Didn't the Sun winning have to do that they pulled the "facts" from the rumors of the abusive actions and testimony of Amber? In other words, if as we've seen she's been lying and the full evidence points against her, the Sun's "win" has no weight for an appeal?

@fmrc93

2 жыл бұрын

@@chael9323 Isn’t stuff like that reason for a judge to recuse themselves from a trial? How was it even allowed to proceed when something like that was known?

@fmrc93

2 жыл бұрын

@B Mack Are you kidding? Did they ever investigate the charity she donated to? That whole UK case sounds like a circus show but without funny clowns, just malicious sad desperate clowns

She has already made wrongful accusations against the Judge, the Jury, the Media and the Fans.

@fkporsche1

2 жыл бұрын

Amber Heard will continues her wrong doing. She and her abysmal legal team are digging a deeper hole. Go right ahead tell her, she will lose and she asking for it.

@SuperLuckao

2 жыл бұрын

Thy r all guilty of court misconduct. Jury was misinformed too. And mostly men.

@Buttons_and_Joysticks

2 жыл бұрын

@@SuperLuckao LOL ok

@tranghunny

2 жыл бұрын

@@SuperLuckao so salty, go step on a bee

@AprilDaniel

2 жыл бұрын

@@SuperLuckao you’re nuts

Ambers side..."Johnny's lawyers demonized amber" Elaine "so sir would you say that doodling whilst eating sweets is a narcissistic trait?" The double standards from amber's side through out the whole trial was so loud

Social media may have, in fact, affected the jury’s judgment; however, not because the jury checked out social media on their own time, as against the judge’s instructions. Remember: it was Elaine’s expert who first presented the hash tags that were trending ( remember the proverbial 4 hashtags) in the Twitterverse. This gave the jury a glimpse or idea of social media’s inclination. But note: it was Elaine’s fantastic lawyering that allowed and first introduced this data to enter the courtroom. Any lawyer worth his salt would have fought not to get any such data on public opinion in the courtroom. Depp’s legal team merely reacted on it from there. Elaine, you laid the red carpet for social media to have a voice inside the court.

This "He had his chance in the UK" argument makes me angry because it's so incredibly disingenuous. The UK case was between different parties, under different laws, making different claims, held to different standards, looking at different facts, and in a different legal system. It could barely be less relevant if it tried. And Elaine knows this very well, yet continues to lie about it.

@mangamama9881

2 жыл бұрын

Wasn't the UK judge connected to her family somehow? That's not even allowed I believe

@Freedom2FlyDrones

2 жыл бұрын

Elaine makes it a thing because Heard is her big movie star client and her first big bank roll. Truth is the UK trail wasn't even against Heard. She just wants to make it about her to reinforce the failing evidence and to corroborate her story in the Fairfax VA case. Heard and Elaine are both waahouts trying to make it big, and flopping.

@derrickcrowe3888

2 жыл бұрын

@@mangamama9881 I've heard this conflict of interest claim and at least half a dozen variations of it. Haven't looked into it myself, so I won't comment. But it doesn't matter. Even if it was the fairest, most legitimate trial ever, it's still irrelevant to the Depp v. Heard case.

@richardque4952

2 жыл бұрын

So the daily mail should issue an official apologize to JD

@patriciachadwick5658

2 жыл бұрын

@@richardque4952 It was the Sun's Dan Wooden, (now at GBNews), who wrote the headline/article that led to the court case.

It seems to me that Elaine is acting unprofessionally taking about a clients case on daytime chat TV. She is also lying. Amber Heard did not win the UK case, The Sun newspaper did.

@cosmicdreamer1387

2 жыл бұрын

IMO I think musk owns most of the Sun

@lesleywilbourne7823

2 жыл бұрын

That’s what I feel. It seems very unprofessional to go onto television and accuse the jurors of behaving against the law and implying the judge made mistakes. And you’re right Amber did not win the uk case she was merely called as a witness.

@TheBrothergreen

2 жыл бұрын

She also wasn't "demonized" by Johnny's team or "the internet." The internet thought she lied her butt off, but they were the ones harping about Johnny's drug habits every 5 minutes and submitting embarrassing photos that had nothing to do with him abusing her, not to mention the obviously fictional whiskey bottle story. Whom was demonizing whom, Elaine?

@PrairieeGirl

2 жыл бұрын

Amber also lied in the UK case (in more than just her abuse evidence) about the money she "donated" to charity. She said she donated all of it by the UK trial, and the judge accepted her word on it without further evidence.

@jacquelinepayne4737

2 жыл бұрын

@@PrairieeGirl So that solidifies her as purjuring herself. I want them to hit her with perjury first. Before they continue this road to appellate court. I want the appellate court to have those charges there as well.

Take your loss, take responsibility, don’t blame everyone else. This attorney is as confused as her client. Blaming the jury, saying they saw and or participated in social media is reprehensible to me. She picked that jury along w JD’s attorneys. Also, in Va, isn’t it true that for AH to appeal she has to post a bond in the amount of the defamation with malice judgement, 10.35 million?

@EliteRock

2 жыл бұрын

Apparently so. And then she has attorney fees on top of that - they're not going to accept a "pledge" (lol) or work pro bono.

@siomaraalonso361

2 жыл бұрын

Can she "pledge" it?

@robertbyrnelawyer

2 жыл бұрын

Stay tuned for a video on the appellate bond. Not as simple as has been reported…

@andypender

2 жыл бұрын

Like Amber like Elaine...they do the Narcissist thing...when they can't control you..they find ways to make others to join their team and hate you....Amber saying this is a set back for women...she's seeking sympathy from vulnerable women who have suffered genuine abuse and sitting on the fence on this ruling... Elaine is trying to make it a UK vs US thing in other to create some kind of friction between both countries legal system...

@factsmatter8667

2 жыл бұрын

@@siomaraalonso361 it would be pretty funny if she stiffed Elaine after all the lies Elaine Bredehoft has spread, but I'm sure Bredehoft got most of the money.

Just curious about the alleged 'medical records' that Elaine claims was 'suppressed' in the US trial: these are supposedly reports by AH to her psychologist/psychiatrist about having been physically and/or sexually abused by JD. My questions are....If her doctor believed her, then wouldn't the doctor be ethically required to report it to the proper authorities? And if her doctor had reported the abuse, then wouldn't there be actual hospital/ER records of injuries to back up AH's claim? No judge would've suppressed hospital records like that, since it would've been critically important to the defamation trial. Just the fact that AH's 'mountain of evidence' seemed to contain a lot of other useless evidence--as opposed to what would've been pretty much unassailable evidence like a hospital report--leads me to believe Elaine is again making a mountain out of a molehill (pun intended).

@CelticBearWoman

2 жыл бұрын

I thought of that too, the requirement to report abuse-- and there was no report.

@musahlongwa6875

2 жыл бұрын

She is talking about fake evidence that they wanted to submit like AH did with the UK case, pathetic really

@SNancyhere

2 жыл бұрын

The more evidence that Heard presents, the more evidence there is against her. All she has is more stuff that proves Johnny's case, such as telling her psychiatrist that she was abused on such-and-such day, when we have now already seen the photographic and audio evidence that she was fine on those days and the following days. She'll just dig her hole deeper.

@triciam4798

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly! Her psychiatrist is a mandated reporter. Her not reporting any of AH’s “heinous” abuse is extremely odd…. That tells us all we need to know

Elaine: *"We weren't allowed to inform the jury about the result of the UK trial".* Also Elaine: *"The jury were definitely looking at social media".* So the jury were selective with what they saw on social media and had no idea about the result of the UK trial.🤣🤣🤣🤣

@karlasosa372

2 жыл бұрын

So true

@GODWESAY

2 жыл бұрын

Also ROTTENBURG in his closing told the Jury he already lost his case in the UK. So yes they know about the UK trial. Camille cleaned it up but yea they knew.

@Alps6408

2 жыл бұрын

Plot twist both of her lawyers are Depp fans and want to screw her out of even more money ;)

@patrickcollier7090

2 жыл бұрын

They also brought in their own media expert who introduced into the record things like #amberturd and #justiceforjohnny. Amber, on the stand, told jurors to "look me up". You can't have it both ways Elaine...

@kumuluskld

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, AH's team already supplied the social media evidence to the jury showing overwhelming public support for JD, jury didn't need to go on soc media. AH team screwed themselves

She was not demonized, she IS the demon. The jury got it right, it’s hard to believe someone that was caught lying under oath 12 times. Anyone else would be locked up or fined. She walked.

@stevepalpatine2828

2 жыл бұрын

Only 12? She didnt go 30 seconds in a 2 day testimony without committing perjury, she lied more than 12 times in the first 12 minutes.

@happydawg2663

2 жыл бұрын

She walked with 2 mil

@kanwagirashid3636

2 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅 dear u made my day that she is the demon and not demonised

@babkeebabkus8177

2 жыл бұрын

believe me this is not going away...it's going to be dragged on due to special interests in the background...remember judges and jurors can be bribed with big $$... most of us know she is absolutely nuts and guilty as hell & got what she deserves but the criminally insane billionaires backing her have an agenda to uphold...a sh!t show all the way

@jamiegreyy

2 жыл бұрын

@@yt45204 I don't believe she's going to pay that money, she might pledge it though

I guess Elaine doesn’t realize we all know she’s lying about the Sun trial. Elaine needs to go on a long vacation and retire for this fiasco of going on talk shows. What an embarrassment to the judicial system

@susien7323

2 жыл бұрын

I have a feeling Elaine knows but don’t forget she is an attorney. The truth doesn’t matter the client does 💵 Did you ever get the feeling that Elaine was looking for her 15 minutes of fame? What a hypocrite and do a press tour. What a bottom feeder

The reason the claim that the jurors were influenced by SNS is BS: if they even slightly knew what's going on SNS, Internet,etc., they would have awarded Johnny full 50 million dollars, not 15 million dollars.

@Talletc

2 жыл бұрын

They're the ones who bought social media in to thy courtroom!

She was way better off when she was just sitting in the court looking like a robot. Her testifying literally ended all her chances and made her look like a complete joke. Johnny was smart when he requested to put cameras and stream the trial for the public. He succeeded in exposing her to the world without even arguing with her directly.

@korpienmahtijullit7508

2 жыл бұрын

This exactly. If there ever was any doubt about AH being a lying manipulator, it all got most clear when she got into the witness stand, and her lies just kept going bigger by the minute, and I am not even mentioning her annoying face gestures and the humiliatingly horrible acting she put us suffer through.

@fairplayer7435

2 жыл бұрын

@@korpienmahtijullit7508 Any man that marries Amber after this, has himself to blame.

@Yossarian.

2 жыл бұрын

@@fairplayer7435 ....hadn't thought of that? Lol. You know there will be some masochist out there that would marry her. Thinking about it; ..it actually could be a money spinner, stay with her for a year or so, record everything then sell your story for a million plus. I'm onboard with this. I wonder if she likes slightly over weight, financially challenged fifty-somethings?

@RondellKB

2 жыл бұрын

This is exactly what I've been saying all along. Johnny Depp's team didn't win that case, Amber herself won the case for Johnny with her nonsensical sotries and theatrics. Having to listen and look at her was the most annoying thing I've experienced in quite some time.

@MoonMoonTM

2 жыл бұрын

@@fairplayer7435 Any person*. Her ex girlfriend was the one she got aggressive with in the airport (and got arrested for)

She’s basically screwed now. It’s like someone that lost who keeps going back to say the winner cheated. She’s a sore loser. The court listened to 6 weeks of ongoing mind numbing testimony and the jury saw what the public saw. That Amber was lying and cannot be trusted. People want Amber to go away and if she’s smart she will. She’s caused enough damage. Remember all of this is because of her.

@anaamis9707

2 жыл бұрын

and her dog step on a bee🤣😂🤣

@SpaceCowboy5

2 жыл бұрын

This is literally the goal of appeal

@fkporsche1

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, yay and more yay! Thank you for explaining how the appeal work in court. Subscribed. Justice prevailed and lies would be punished.

@serenaleaghgrace5023

2 жыл бұрын

you,,,, and the planet know that, so we cant be wrong hey?????????

@fkporsche1

2 жыл бұрын

Pardon but I have to say Cacamber Heard had made so much disturbance, such a trouble maker and all those things are all made up lies. The worst part was lying about donating to charities. Unfortunate, sick children and people are depending on donation to help them. If Cacamber doesn’t want to make a contribution to charities is completely fine, totally legal. She did this glorious seven million dollars donation claim to charities yo help sick abused children on national television was a lied, not a true fact!! This is bad! We cannot tolerate this type of abysmal Amber Heard character. Someone has to stop 🛑 ✋ this Amber Heard continues her bad doing.

So let's get this straight, the reason Amber lost according to her attorney is the judge didn't do the right thing, the jury didn't follow their oath, Johnny's attorney's were not ethical, Amber made mistakes on the stand, the media played a part, the fans interfered because they wanted to be in the courtroom and Johnny was a celebrity (even though Amber was also). Let us not forget that more than one witness she accused of wanting their 15 minutes of fame when their testimony didn't support Amber's claims. Hmmm I didn't hear anything about the quality of her doing her job. In addition to that she's a bold-faced liar for simple things like a suggesting Johnny is trying to retry his case with Amber. He didn't even Sue Amber in the UK. She knows damn well that's a separate case. I have to give a credit. She found someone to represent her who is just as delusional, narcissistic and blames everyone else for a failing just like she does.

Brilliantly analysed. I hadn't even considered the fact that they awarded Amber Heard money means it will be even harder to suggest the jury were absolutely biased against her.

@robertbyrnelawyer

2 жыл бұрын

thanks for watching!

She’s making assumptions about the jury members - basically insulting them and their verdict.

@deborahmiller1249

2 жыл бұрын

Worse than that she's accusing them of misconduct.

@angelakyle4838

2 жыл бұрын

@@deborahmiller1249 how insulting and dismissive of her. . So wearying listening to her ridiculousness.

@deborahmiller1249

2 жыл бұрын

@@angelakyle4838 I couldn't agree more.

@heatherann1560

2 жыл бұрын

She told the jury that they can look her up during her testimony lol umm No they are not allowed to do that Amber 🙄. She should have been in trouble for encouraging the jury to search the internet after the judge instructed them not to and now Elaine wants to accuse the jury of looking at social media

@musahlongwa6875

2 жыл бұрын

I couldn't have said it better, this woman had both her feet in her mouth the whole time...she really is not a bright spark. She and AH need help

There was no medical records, she didn’t see medical practitioner for her serious injuries! There was lots of evidence Johnny wasn’t allowed to use in this case to.

@vanessaford8630

2 жыл бұрын

Amber saying she has scar tissue in her nose, Johnny Depps lawyer, objection, hearsay 😂

@andrewh1113

2 жыл бұрын

@@vanessaford8630 Nasal scar tissue doesn't occur if you get hit in the nose. It occurs when you have surgery. She has had multiple nose jobs. She should have scars on her face not in her nose if she was hit. This is especially evident considered Depp wears massive spiky rings. Not a single scar on her face.

@marquitamarina1486

2 жыл бұрын

@@vanessaford8630 too much cocaine will cause scar tissue and other problems in the nose

@katherinehennessyhunt5331

2 жыл бұрын

@@vanessaford8630 That would be from all the Coke she's been snorting over the years.

@FlexGC

2 жыл бұрын

@@katherinehennessyhunt5331 Yes. That's what I would suspect. Would be interesting to get a medical explanation. Cocaine causes constriction or closing of blood vessels. When cocaine is snorted through the nose, it causes the blood vessels in the nasal lining to constrict. Chronic cocaine usage can result in prolonged constriction of the nasal lining blood vessels with the resultant death of these tissues. This results in sores in the nasal lining and septum that can lead to perforations of the septum, infection, loss of supporting cartilage, scarring, and eventual collapse of the nose. The resultant constellation of deformities is commonly known as “cocaine nose”. Unique to the cocaine nose is the relative sparing of the external skin cover, but underneath lie many, many problems.

She wasnt on trial on the UK case, johnny was, and johnnys supporting rebuttals were severely limited, she chose this venue for that reason specifically. Having now seen the full scope of his rebuttals, despite still being limited and tearing apart her case almost entirely, she has no grounds to actually appeal this unless she has someone get on the stand with a GOOD random unrelated heresaying testimony this time around to make her lies more believable and disprove some of johnnies factually based claims. - Not that she can because she's millions in the negatives Side-note, i think the judge was exceedingly fair with Amber and if anything she gave her way more leeway than was deserved, although she was a defending party. Was a very fair trial, they gave Amber all the chances she needed and they failed to produce feasible evidence and arguments to disprove that she didn't create a defamatory situation. - If the Jury felt they had reason to suspect even one of her rebuttals were falsely claimed or fabricated, they have the right by law to consider amongst themselves that the rest of the speculated rebuttals 'without proper supporting evidence or not' could also be considered False testimonies and False, or disregardable evidence. - as this is a defamation case - and the full scope of a personality as well as preceding events pertaining to the individuals surrounding said defamation will also be considered. The defamation case could likely still have been won even if he had physically abused her, because the op-ed in question stating that she spoke out about SEXUAL VIOLENCE 'Can' be construed as false, since she had no evidence to support any sexual violence - And since she linked the article she "Claimed" to have had written by someone else and then signed off on in that op-ed, relating to her alleged abuse, it's basically a straight admission of guilt swayed in defamation unless she could of proven he assaulted her with a bottle, which she never did even in the UK Trial. She signed off on it, it's not true, it's defamation. Hope that clears this up for people, because even if you want to still hate on Johnny Depp or Amber, you have to now consider the full scope of the situation, and that is, there is no way to tell if he hit her, there's certainly no way to tell if he "raped" her, but there is reasonable enough doubt to prove that even if he did hit her, he most likely did not "rape" her and thus the op-ed was intended with malice and exaggerated. It's unfortunate she didn't keep the original photos she took of her "injuries", and instead basically wiped and regenerated the meta data, put the photos through editing programs and submitting non originals masquerading them as original photos.. The meta data expert Johnny produced absolutely shut down mostly all of her recovery chance for proving any kind of factualism for those photographs.

@susannehunter4017

2 жыл бұрын

JD wasn't "on trial" in the UK case. That was a civil case in defamation, brought by Depp, against the Sun newspaper. The newspaper was the defender. The law in England is different from American. Under English law, the party accused of defamation must prove that what they printed, was substantially true. (The judge held that that it was).

I’ll be shocked if Amber stops any of this. I just can’t see her stopping, she will continue until she “ wins “ and will continue to badmouth Johnny forever. She will never back down because in her eyes, she’s done nothing wrong. I think it’s disgusting that her lawyer is going around doing a press tour, like who’s looking for their 15minutes of Fame now ? It’s disgusting that people are still on ambers side after all the evidence that’s come forward, all because she’s a woman. Newsflash, women can be abusive, lying, evil, manipulative pieces of crap too, not just men. Men suffer from abuse aswell Just makes me sick how the media is treating Amber, like this wounded Angel who could do no wrong.

@MammaM1217

2 жыл бұрын

This! Couldn't have said it better myself! Abusers are abusers, narcissists are narcissists. Elaine lost her case the moment she took on amber as a client. She accused witnesses of wanting 15 minutes of fame, because that's what she was doing. And now she had to keep going because she didn't get the game she wanted. Soon she will sue for defamation because she will be out of work

@Scheherasad

Жыл бұрын

a wounded angel who has already hit her ex-wife

@sarahr1235

Жыл бұрын

AH. Has a deep imbedded hatred for her father, taking it out on Johnny ( misdirected anger) she needs healing. Elaine could try to get help for Amber? Instead of spreading. Tall tales from the dark side( evil)

@sarahr1235

Жыл бұрын

Good is evil and evil is Good? Honest ,humble people like Johnny is rare in this society! So people can’t accept it? Amber’s type is all over the map, people believe evil people.??!

The uk case wasn’t against Amber, it was against the Sun Newspaper (with a powerful/influential owner). So Amber wasn’t the defendant in the case she was called as a witness. It’s likely jurors would have been aware of the uk case but to imply jurors went home and broke the rules is disgusting! Amber was poisoned by herself when she consistently lied and lied again when she got caught out in the lies.

@vixxxenfoxxx3660

2 жыл бұрын

The Judge in charge of that case has a son that works for the Sun. I'm really surprised this wasn't a conflict of interest.

@ntawvdabneeg9993

2 жыл бұрын

@@vixxxenfoxxx3660 The judge's son is the journalist that wrote the article calling JD the wife beater. So yes, we know why JD didn't win.

@vixxxenfoxxx3660

2 жыл бұрын

@@ntawvdabneeg9993 I didn't know it went THAT deep, I just knew the son worked for the Sun. This makes it so much worse. That Judge had full control over the verdict and of course he wasn't going to rule against his baby boy's own article. I'm really amazed this isn't grounds for a retrial.

@bernadettecrawford3656

2 жыл бұрын

The Sun is banned in liverpool for printing lies about the dead victims of the football tragedy

@bluerolex

2 жыл бұрын

@@vixxxenfoxxx3660 His son worked for a sister company also owned by Rupert Murdock. He did not write the article nor does he work for the Sun. That was Daniel Wooten. Either way, I'm glad the jury saw the truth here and ruled correctly.

I find that Ambers lawyer is being completely disrespectful of the judge and the jury as well as the public at large. We all saw the evidence and listened to everyone involved in the case speak and came to our own conclusions. To say anyone was swayed by social media is ludicrous.

@not-even-german4892

2 жыл бұрын

She's being very unprofessional 🙄

@jorr1334

2 жыл бұрын

Is Elaine actually defaming the jury?

@DirefulT453

2 жыл бұрын

And there in lies what the MSM is afraid of, 'you' being able to assess the evidence and make up your own mind, therefore how can they control the narrative?

@jackiestewart3651

2 жыл бұрын

I totally agree..Very unprofessional..she is killing her own career

@babkeebabkus8177

2 жыл бұрын

@@jackiestewart3651 believe me this is not going away...it's going to be dragged on due to special interests in the background...remember judges and jurors can be bribed with big $$... most of us know she is absolutely nuts and guilty as hell & got what she deserves but the criminally insane billionaires backing her have an agenda to uphold (woman over man)...I predict she gets a retrial and bribed jurors reverse the original verdict...a sh!t show all the way

AH's lawyer is a disgrace. Self reporting to a Therapist is NOT Medical Records. - and Social Media did NOT make the case for JD. AH LOST the case bc she lied her way thru the trial, from beginning to end. Everyone could see right through her ridiculous and horrific lies. she even lied when she didn't have to, like the TMZ video, she could have said yep I sent it bc I was mad, but no she lied & said I wouldn't even know how to do that, then later said with rage I could have released it in a much more sophisticated way. Also, the UK trial was against the Sun, not AH, so isn't relevant.

@emilylee9894

2 жыл бұрын

Actually, psychiatrist's notes and observations ARE medical records.

@angieyoung8784

2 жыл бұрын

Yep reporting to a medical professional is medical records actually

@emilylee9894

2 жыл бұрын

Psychiatrists are physicians.

@rebeccahenderson7761

2 жыл бұрын

@@emilylee9894 Psychiatrists are NOT Medical Doctors. They are licensed in "psychotropic medications." They use Meds to change behaviour - that's it.

@rebeccahenderson7761

2 жыл бұрын

@@emilylee9894 There were no notes or observations of physical or sexual abuse.

I think it's going to be hard for Amber's side to claim the whole social media aspect when they are the ones that brought it up in court. They are the ones that showed the public opinion about the case. #justiceforjohhny #amberturd

I am kind of shocked at what Elaine is doing. She seems to be accusing the judge and the jury without any evidence. Can a lawyer actually do that on several public TV channels???

@killerrabbit2693

2 жыл бұрын

I'm asking the same thing. Isn't this defamation?

@seventhson27

2 жыл бұрын

$$$$$

@carolperks9738

2 жыл бұрын

It seems she is just trying to save her reputation! She is in panic mode!

@7piecebucket

2 жыл бұрын

Sure, she can say it. The general term for what Elaine is accusing the judge and jury of is "jury misconduct". The term also applies to instances where, for example, one of the jurors is somehow linked to one of the parties, but purposely hid this fact from the court. There have been cases that have been thrown out and retried because of jury misconduct. But Elaine would have to prove that this actually happened, PLUS she would have to prove that it actually made a difference in the outcome. Just complaining that "social media was everywhere!" is not enough.

@insanemainstream3633

2 жыл бұрын

@@carolperks9738 Totally agree. I doubt she will ever work again after this disaster.

Personally, it appears to me that Elaine is trying to rehabilitate her legal reputation. Her client is a pathological liar which made her job as a lawyer difficult but she made the choice to defend her, so the onus is on her. Instead, she's making the rounds like Amber Heard, herself, blaming anything that walks or crawls . . . EXCEPT HERSELF . . . which is pathetically shameless.

@traceygeer797

2 жыл бұрын

I’m was totally shocked I really thought Elaine herself didn’t believe her, only because there was some testifying that was in favor of JD!!

@stephenmisener1659

2 жыл бұрын

I think shes realized she will never get another client again, so before she retires shes sucking every penny out of amber she can before she does it.

@janebethfrancis9351

2 жыл бұрын

@THE M NETWORK ( The Millionaire Network) i agree but i think lay low would be the best step for them. Going out lashing on everyone esp the people in court is just so bad.

@defjam137

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe she's also a narcissist like amber turd. I won't be surprised if she is

@mattieclan8957

2 жыл бұрын

Mind blowing to see how Elaine cannot see that she is making it far worse for herself and I, and am not surprise a lot of us were kind of feeling sorry for her because it would not have been easy having Amber as a client and Elaine was doing the best she can BUT NOW with her going on a 15 minute of fame circuit, I feel that she and Amber actually are truly enmeshed in it all.

Elaine is such a hypocrit. Amber adressed everything she saw in social media the day before first thing on the stand. They are such sleazy lawyers. They played so dirty and now jonnys lawyers are the unfair ones. It is unbelivable. Her team and amber are a perfect fit.

Is Elaine allowed to go on interviews and discuss “evidence” that was never seen, including disclosing what the conversation supposedly was? All of Ambers claims were against Johnnys previous attorney and was he said after the UK hearing - I just can’t wrap my head around how this is being given the green light in her camp?!

@sharonventer1690

2 жыл бұрын

She must do that..make it inadmissible

Do you remember Elaine's closing argument? She said, "he (Johnny) has never accepted responsibility for anything in his life, he hasn't admitted to anything, he's blaming everybody in the world, his agent, his manager, his lawyer, Amber, his friends, everybody but we ask you to hold him legally responsible for his actions. We don't want anything, we want him to leave Amber alone". Look what happened now. Look who's not taking the responsibility for their actions even though the Jury gave their verdict and legally hold her responsible for her hoax. Now Elaine and Amber's team blaming everyone including Judge, the Jury, social media, people, Johnny & his lawyers. People around the world heard & saw everything. You lost, give up now & move on with your miserable life. Wasn't that what you wanted?

@babkeebabkus8177

2 жыл бұрын

believe me this is not going away...it's going to be dragged on due to special interests in the background...remember judges and jurors can be bribed with big $$... most of us know she is absolutely nuts and guilty as hell & got what she deserves but the criminally insane billionaires backing her have an agenda to uphold (woman over man)...a sh!t show all the way

@igordasunddas3377

2 жыл бұрын

Since you didn't buy into AHs lies, you must be a paid JD bot. 🤣. At least if we go by AH's "logic".

@karlasosa372

2 жыл бұрын

Good observation

@howard1beale

2 жыл бұрын

Excellent comment

@smudgeit

2 жыл бұрын

@@igordasunddas3377 or rottenbournes cat 🐈 🤐🤣🤣🤣🤣

Elaine Bredehoft's comments about the impact of social media is laughable when you consider her team had a witness on the stand removed based on a doctored text image on a phone handed to them by Eve Barlow who is not part of the proceedings and also that the doctored text image was a year old.

@nancymcgough6707

2 жыл бұрын

it was ambers own witness who brought in the #justiceforjohnny and #amberturd ... then they wanna cry that social media was impacting the trial lol

Elaine: “Basically, it’s ALL everyone else’s fault except Amber and everyone else is a liar. Except Amber. I rest my case.” 🤔 No Elaine, Amber is a liar. Period

The appeal will be difficult simply because Amber's team was trying to argue a DV case or a SV case which was a wrong attack, and they know it now. So now they want another bite of the apple. The bottom line is that this was a defamation case, and so argued improperly by the defense. If Amber wanted to argue a DV case, she should have pressed charges for DV a long time ago. If she won that case, things would look a whole lot different now. Same with a SV case. For whatever reason, she believes that her testimony is evidence. Not so. The UK trial was not against her, and truth be known, it was not proven in that trial that JD was into DV or SV. It was proven by the UK way of law, that the Sun et al, did not slander or commit libel against him. Two major differences there. That the allegations against JD over there are very similar... again, the case was against the publications, not Amber, and as such there was no way of disproving the allegations, which until they were dis-proven The publications had every right to say, "Amber said.......". Now, if Amber alleged... it is always in a newspaper that the police alleged this or that against so-n-so. But, now JD has gotten to face his accuser, and his accuser is not happy. Now, as Amber would say, "I wish he would just go away and leave me alone... but first I am going to attack one more time through the appeal process".

She's been caught lying multiple times, wouldnt that be a cause for the jury to won't believe on everything she had said?

@vixxxenfoxxx3660

2 жыл бұрын

Everyone is cheering about justice but I personally believe full Justice is AH being held accountable for lying under oath.

@sgtkabukiman9411

2 жыл бұрын

Being caught lying once introduces "reasonable doubt" that there will likely be more lies and basically her whole testimony then becomes tainted. To then argue with a lawyer, on the stand, that the lie is the truth and you just misunderstood me is suicidal.

@pralayaryan

2 жыл бұрын

@@vixxxenfoxxx3660 and perjury or evidence

@seokjinstwerkinghusband3881

2 жыл бұрын

@@bambooprincess3495 Where?

@seokjinstwerkinghusband3881

2 жыл бұрын

She also lied under oath twice regarding DONATING 7 million dollars to ACLU and Children hospital. In UK and in this trial too 🤡 And Camille Vasquez called out 🔥

I believe Miss Heard actually confessed on the stand to Camille. " that's why I wrote the OP-Ed" when she was talking about Johnny Depps abuse. Elaine and Amber need to get over it, and now Elaine is going public on talk shows telling more lies, like lawyer like client.

@saidahbt.joharikpm-guru1686

2 жыл бұрын

She cant accept that she was lost

@drag0nblight

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, it is in response to Atty. Camille Vasquez last question. She slipped up there like she slipped up in Depp v The Sun about TMZ.

@lesleywilbourne7823

2 жыл бұрын

Yes she did confess that and because the case was being televised it was there for all the world to hear.

@rachely.1222

2 жыл бұрын

This is probably the most used line I've seen surrounding this case. And it usually is from people who never watched the trial in full and their only form of context were small clips they saw online. Amber's own lawyers said multiple times through the trial that Amber was indeed talking about JD when she wrote "2 years ago I became a victim..." They even mentioned it AGAIN in their closing arguments saying this: "“We’re not running from the fact that when she discussed becoming a public victim representing domestic abuse, Amber was speaking of her experience reporting domestic abuse against Johnny Depp" I'm not pro-Amber or Pro- JD. I believe both should have lost and both were abusive to each other but people are taking this 1 thing and running with it assuming that's the only element required for defamation. It simply isn't.

@mattespoart5019

2 жыл бұрын

She did. Amber did admit to it

The judge in the UK trial also DIDN’T look at lots of the evidence that was submitted to him and was allowed in this trial. As for the social media influence, AH’s team brought it in through one of their witness and through questions about social media that they asked AH herself while on the stand. And she’ll only be able to appeal if she can afford it, and her lawyer went on record in at least one interview saying AH can’t afford the settlement she owes.

@timshelton7905

2 жыл бұрын

If there is an appeal by THIS team it’ll be because her homeowners insurer who hired them does so under her defense under her policy. My gut is her insurer pays the policy limit and exits the stage. I may be wrong but it would not surprise me.

@susien7323

2 жыл бұрын

If this trial was in the can and the UK trial came up second he would’ve won that. He truly cleared his name.

If anything I think the judge gave the Heard team a lot of rope to hang themselves with. She over- ruled the Depp team several times that I thought was iffy if not outright unfair. Elaine has crossed a line imo and I hope she’s brought up before the bar for her bad faith and malicious public interviews.

It seems to me that Elaine on national television is saying that Johnny Depp is guilty of domestic violence in a more direct way than Amber Heard did. I’d love to see her being pursued by the Depp camp. That would be worth a watch.

@theequalizer2727

2 жыл бұрын

I think there is some leeway here because she is talking about the trial.

I thought the Judge was a class act. Maybe it's cuz I'm a layman but she really impressed me with her fairness and being on top of everything the whole time.

@divineordergovernsmylife808

2 жыл бұрын

She needs to be in the senate💜

@melasoomarie952

2 жыл бұрын

Don't forget her patience

@robertbyrnelawyer

2 жыл бұрын

She was exceptional!

She needs to move on, enjoy being a mom without spending her daughters whole life in court. It’s over man. This judge was a saint! As far as the jurors knowing about social media - Ambers own witness brought in social media by talking about the hashtags. SMH.

@robertbyrnelawyer

2 жыл бұрын

St. Penney! I agree! Thx

@susien7323

2 жыл бұрын

Was pretty funny to see the word #AmberTurd Was repeated so many times in court. Which made it into the transcription. about it. 😂 On the flipside she did a decent job for a high school dropout.

Elaine is desperately and hopelessly trying to save her career, as she must have realized how her ineffective lawyering was criticized.

How can she sue the whole world? She wants to sue us - everyone! That is delusional….

@1mol831

2 жыл бұрын

I hope she tries to sue the internet by suing KZread and Silicon Valley for letting the case go online. The media is probably going to turn against them if they try to do that.

@MorningStar202

2 жыл бұрын

Yet, she wanted her right for free speech!!!! None else should have the right for free speech but her!😅

@terryholdenuk

2 жыл бұрын

Because in Ambers mind she's right, everyone else is wrong, she's belives everything she dreams up

@maryw3989

2 жыл бұрын

Well if Amber's going to sue me she better get after it bc I'm about an ants eyelash away from living under a bridge in a cardboard condo and I'll burn my cardboard condo up before I let Amber take it away from me!

@furbabydaddy814

2 жыл бұрын

I hope she doesn’t sue me for what I………er…….haven’t been saying about her. 😂

She’s definitely going to appeal just like she was definitely going to donate her divorce settlement monies.

@avidb3052

2 жыл бұрын

🤣

@oscardesignma

2 жыл бұрын

She's going to pledge the appeal

@babkeebabkus8177

2 жыл бұрын

@Advanced Driving believe me this is not going away...it's going to be dragged on due to special interests in the background...remember judges and jurors can be bribed with big $$... most of us know she is absolutely nuts and guilty as hell & got what she deserves but the criminally insane billionaires backing her have an agenda to uphold (woman over man)...a sh!t show all the way

@Chings001

2 жыл бұрын

🤣

@nataliec5883

2 жыл бұрын

Stupid aren’t ya

How can a lawyer accuse Jurors like that? How is that allowed? If I was a Juror, I'd be FURIOUS after almost 7 weeks of my life being ripped away, and then the lawyer accusing me of wrongdoing just from her own opinion!!!

Just say, for argument’s sake, that she has valid grounds for an appeal. Doesn’t she have to come up with the money to not only pay the original settlement, in case she loses, but also court costs for a new trial? She ain’t got it according to many sources. So how could she possible pay for an appeal?

@heatherann1560

2 жыл бұрын

That's what numerous lawyers have been saying. Did you hear Amber was paying 22,300 a month to rent a house in Virginia during the trial

@magicalmystery1964

2 жыл бұрын

@@heatherann1560 well Little Darlings, a strip club in Vegas, offered her an audition to raise that 8.35 million! In case she needs a job.

@susien7323

2 жыл бұрын

She’s going to pay in pledges, it’s the same

@magicalmystery1964

2 жыл бұрын

@@susien7323 Lolol

Elaine came unprepared during the trial and it looks like she believed the lies of Amber! And now she's stretching her "15 minutes of fame" and bet you, Morgan Tremaine is laughing at her right now! Is she getting additional pay for doing these tv talk shows? I felt sorry for her during the trial but now, she is simply a pathetic, unprofessional and unethical human being! Sad!

@carolgarza2023

2 жыл бұрын

Elaine knows Amber has no $$. So she has to HOPE that if they appeal, they will win so she can recoup her fees and APPEAR somewhat credible. It’s all about $$$$. Johnny is worth over $500 million. Amber about 8 million (IF that much). That’s why Amber counter sued for $100 million! She did not even have 10 million!! But her bad acting and constant lies did Amber in. She is really gonna need therapy NOW!!

@janebethfrancis9351

2 жыл бұрын

elaine was with amber during UK trial. she must have thought they would still win 🤦‍♀️

@kings98124

2 жыл бұрын

Morgan Tremaine tweeted about this actually. Yeah he's laughing at her. Also, he did a charity stream. :)

@babkeebabkus8177

2 жыл бұрын

believe me she has benefactors...billionaire psycho elites ain't gonna let this slide because it ruins their agenda of woman over man...expect a retrial organized by way of bribed judge and original verdict reversed by bribed jurors...now the big dogs are playing

If I was a jurist and a lawyer accused me of doing what I wasn't supposed to do I'd be suing that lawyer. She basically said that the jury went home and watch the news and let social media decide for them. Unbelievable. She has no business accusing the jury of anything. That just makes me really mad. I mean seriously, what's the sense of having a jury if you're going to be accused of not doing the right thing.

@charlottewatkins6356

2 жыл бұрын

Well let's all face the fact A H whats what J D worked for all his life she is a taker gold digger she can't get it for her self by working so this her way of life

@divineordergovernsmylife808

2 жыл бұрын

She blames everyone. Does not take accountability, she’s just a joke

@calicokittenproductions591

2 жыл бұрын

Its what happens when you judge people by your own standards... obviously not this make up palette 🙄

@sydnidowney3598

2 жыл бұрын

A jurist is a judge.

@equatorialjourney4478

2 жыл бұрын

Gimme a break ...it should never have been a jury trial in the first place , esp in this day and age of social media . Impossible to find jurors who had not been exposed to the notorious insane popularity of JD Jack Sparrow fame . It was prejudicial right from the get go & a ridiculous expectation that they could avoid press , media exposure ( ALL BIASED in favour of J ) for 7 long weeks . And to then allow TV & the daily circus of fans inside and outside the court .....PREJUDICIAL on those grounds, straight off the bat . Judge should have done due diligence on these aspects alone before allowing the daily circus to unfold . AH didn’t have a level playing field of impartiality from day one . Am glad E Laine is on record for this . She was right ....it was a colosseum with the same victim being thrown to the lions day after day after day

Elaine is making an egregious claim that the jury's decision was influenced by social media without any evidence to support her allegation. Secondly when she is talking about evidence she omits to address the fact that team Amber ignored a court order to hand over evidence to team Johnny so that it could be forensically examining before the trial by withholding the material and playing games with their experts. Whilst DA claims should not IMO be subject to public exposure it was a brave decision in this case to let everyone see just how false Amber's accusations were. Even if the public were excluded I am confident that the jury would have returned the same verdict however the media would have tried to control the narrative more and that would have been a circus. At least everyone got to see the sham that Ambers case was really built on.

Something you left out that has a major implications on her being able to file an appeal is that, as in VA jurisdiction she would need to post a bond for the judgement against her as well as attorneys fees. And the fact that her attorney has publicly stated that she cannot afford to pay the judgement she most likely would not be able to post that bond. Additionally since the jury’s judgment dealt with actual malice, the judgment is non-dischargeable under US Bankruptcy statutes. So I HIGHLY doubt that there will actually be an appeal because shy of getting a loan from Elon Musk, she will not be able to post the necessary bond do move forward.

Great analysis. As you've pointed out, they have little if any grounds for an appeal.

@johnllewlyndavies222

2 жыл бұрын

Totally agree. It sounds desperate. But there ARE grounds for an investigation into the UK case - the judge's son worked with Dan Wootton, who wrote the libellous article.

@JoshDreonOfficial

2 жыл бұрын

@@johnllewlyndavies222 Yes absolutely agree!

@me-bs2rp

Жыл бұрын

@John Llewlyn Davies nope the UK appeal was already rejected. That avenue was closed.

@JoshDreonOfficial

Жыл бұрын

@@me-bs2rp it can always be re-opened if there are new grounds which there now are.

This Judge was excellent. She was firm, pleasant, patient and fair

@jrjr9358

2 жыл бұрын

She's an idiot unqualified to do this case. The legal system is broken, but that's beside the point ... "harmless error", etc., but 90 percent of cases reversed on appeal and get retried come out with the opposite result -- that's how devastating a judge's rulings are ... but let's look at just a couple rulings/items: 1. Allowing in Settlement Negotiations made by Heard's lawyer in her divorce case. Will lawyers anywhere be able to try to settle cases in the future knowing that all their settlement communications may be used against their clients? 2. Failing to pay charity pledges. Unbelievable. 3. When Depp's able lawyers (superior and better connected than Heard's, obviously. Who pro hoc viced them? And where did they find their experts? and Heard's team their "experts"? Did her lawyers have much trial experience? Didn't appear so. I had a lousy expert once and when you have one you lose.) ... When his able lawyers claimed Heard had recently made up false claims, don't her 2012 statements to therapists have to come in? 4. Lots more, but I don't have time for this and would need to see the records anyway, and jury instructions. What did you think of the judge's jury instructions counsel? And isn't this just all a story of the richer and more powerful winning? Didn't Ruppert Murdock's company/paper win in London? And Depp won here. Is it just a matter of us English speakers having the best justice system money can buy? (Oh, and it's obvious to me that Depp's "PR people" paid trolls to stoke the social media fire (and I am sure there are some "organic" ones too. that's what happens when you have a lot of money creating that and such a popular figure as Depp. I love lots of his work. I didn't know who she was until this trial, but it does appear she's being picked on. Oh, and what is the required analysis in Virginia to allow cameras in the courtroom. That seems a very poor decision by this jurist who appeared unqualified to handle such a case. What do you think?

You did an excellent job of explaining all of this "law" stuff. I watched the entire trial with lawyers online so I think I can say that I seriously think Elaine should shut up and go home. She is not doing herself or Amber any good by bashing Johnny and his legal team. I think Amber should be prosecuted for lying on the stand under oath...several times.

@robertbyrnelawyer

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching! I think Elaine is trying to do a little damage control . . .

@susien7323

2 жыл бұрын

Honestly I wish Australia would go after her about the pups in the quarantine. She thinks her 💩doesn’t stink. I will bet if the maid testified she would say yes it does

Mr. Byrne, thank you so very much for your analysis of the Depp v. Heard trial. You brought an objective perspective to the situation and I appreciate you doing so. I learned from this video, so decided to subscribe. Regards, Diane

You know what confuses me? The argument: "oh, I never named you, Johnny Depp, in op-ed, but also, yes you did abuse me, and yes I was talking about you." Trying to have her cake and eat it too.

@ceedye7321

2 жыл бұрын

Your so right, I was thinking it would be so much easier to not make up all the lies and say she was talking about the past and she is not willing to name them! Therefore no deformation l, but she is crazy so thought she could pull it off, now she won't work again and owes millions 🤣🤣

She has no chance of winning an appeal. The fact that proving the judgment of the Judge and jury was incorrect would be near impossible since overall the whole trial was fairly conducted, the reality is she lied, under oath, several times so if she wants to claim that the judgment was unfair, the courts can claim she shouldn't have provided false information that clearly would have been taken into consideration in any judgments the jury made. She really has no justification for an appeal, in fact she'll be lucky if she doesn't get charged for perjury.

@reginafetty6374

2 жыл бұрын

Not just that but she admitted the op-ed was about Johnny and she showed malice intent.

@Blazegraze12

2 жыл бұрын

@@reginafetty6374 Exactly.

@sarahr1235

2 жыл бұрын

I thought Amber was broke, where’s all the money coming from to go back to court? Elaine looks like she hasn’t miss any meals! I’m sure she and her team want Good old American dollars $$ or pledges? She just brought a house while owning JD . Etc. charities. Can’t believe AH.

@Blazegraze12

2 жыл бұрын

@@sarahr1235 It's most likely just empty words and even if it isn't what was so unfair about the trial is she going to appeal? What solid ground does she have?

@Jayy997

2 жыл бұрын

She should be getting charged for multiple counts of perjury and being locked behind bars... not having the freedom to even entertain the idea of appealing.

Thank you. I am a UK former lawyer so your walk through of the Appeals process in Virginia was very interesting.

As a former law student (ended up running s successful business in another field that changed my professional carrier) I have to say that this is the first channel that walks people through this legally in a way that gives the content real credibility and also gives us some useful information. Something I as a novice of the Virginia legal system (living in Sweden) really appreciate. Cant (or haven't had time) to fact-check the source yet but taking the content as-is is right now I do believe this and find it really interesting. Hope people take notice of the difference between this and other "Lawyer"-KZreadr content and appreciate this breakdown of the case from a local legal standpoint. I sure do. Thanks!

@robertbyrnelawyer

Жыл бұрын

Thanks Morgan -- I appreciate your kind words. And thank you for watching!

Actually, your treatment of this case was lucid, succinct, coherent and compelling. Well done!

If Amber is not charged with perjury then there is no since in having the law, she was as flagrant a liar on the stand as I have ever seen.

@donnicholas7552

2 жыл бұрын

Totally agree.

@nameless7174

2 жыл бұрын

The trial was in a civil court, not possible to be charged with perjury.

@donnicholas7552

2 жыл бұрын

@@nameless7174 I was not aware of that.

@timshelton7905

2 жыл бұрын

Sure it is. Civil testimony under oath is just as subject to perjury laws as testimony in a criminal case.

@nameless7174

2 жыл бұрын

@@timshelton7905 🤦‍♀️😂 go do some research buddy, perjury only applies to criminal matters

Given Elaine's level of skill shown in her closing arguments, appeal might be difficult for her to attain.

Elaine going on these talk shows isn’t doing herself any service. She’s making excuses for the loss, although AH was awarded some damages. She’s blaming judge, social media, jury, JD. Elaine was out lawyered and didn’t have a credible witness. The jury saw through the bs and really fake crying. I don’t think she’ll get the appeal

I'm surprised at Elaine speaking to the media & also criticising and blaming everyone else - with unsubstantiated accusations and wild remarks. I thought as a lawyer she would be sensible and logical once all this was over and be quiet. She's proving she isn't in fact a good lawyer and she seems to be similar to Ms Heard - attention seeking, untruthful and nasty.

@ComradeCommissarYuri

2 жыл бұрын

Elaine: “Adam waldman defamed my client!!” Continues to do exactly the thing Adam did which is talk to people about it!!!

Elaine literally blamed everyone but herself. She blamed the social media, the jury, Johnny and the judge for giving a one week pause and not letting evidence 🙄 be presented. Good that we watched everything.

Elaine speaks about giving him his shot in the UK case, but they literally gave him no shot in the UK case, they had all of his potential witnesses and evidence redacted so he couldnt submit any counter evidence relevant to her claims. That's why amber makes the reference of people coming out of the woodworks after all these years, because it's the only time they've been able to be called on in all those years.

@greenonions5296

2 жыл бұрын

Elaine makes zero sense, by her crazy reasoning Amber shouldn't be allowed to appeal because she lost this trial so one could say she had her shot.

She said Amber won in the UK, no Elaine, The Sun won

The audio recordings combined with blatant lying by Amber were devastating to her case. This has nothing to do with social media or suppressed evidence. Amber herself was all the jury needed to see and hear.

@medusaspupil

2 жыл бұрын

She lost fair and square, just like donald trump. I hope Amber doesn't start an Insurrection.

@danniwilder2198

2 жыл бұрын

@@medusaspupil Or try to frame Johnny Depp with a Russian collusion hoax.

@Infiltator2

2 жыл бұрын

And she herself brought in Social Media and that the jury should look her up

@Solitude11-11

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly. So many people have said they went in neutral or even pro Amber, but then she destroyed herself. The pledge vs donate nonsense. Denying the trailer park manager existed. Referring to JD’s witnesses as ‘coming out of the woodwork’. Employing ‘expert witnesses’ that were basically a joke. The audio of her saying see who believes you. And on, and on. And I think the final straw was when she said she wrote the op-ed because Johnny was powerful and she ‘knew this would happen’. Which doesn’t tally with the audio of ‘see who believes you’. I also think the judge isn’t someone you want to be poking accusations at unless you have very very good grounds, to say the least…

@babkeebabkus8177

2 жыл бұрын

@@Solitude11-11 this sh!t is not going away...it will be dragged on by the big dogs...I predict she gets her retrial because special interests are backing her (none other than criminally insane billionaire €lites with an agenda of 'woman over man' to uphold)...judges and jurors can be bribed if the $$ are large enough...get more popcorn ready coz this sh!tshow is definitely continuing

One of the problems with complaining about social media is that Amber Herd's team introduced it into evidence with a survey of online comments. Therefore it caused Johnny Depp's team to debunk it. Also Amber talked about it during her testimony. How would Elaine Bredehoft be able to blame the jury for considering social media under these circumstances?

@traceygeer797

2 жыл бұрын

Miss Heard had Eve Barlow on social media, remember she got kicked out of the court room! Miss Heard was also responding on social media! Where do you think she got that information about microwave my baby!

@KaribeCuebas

2 жыл бұрын

@@traceygeer797 Exactly! I thought the Judge instructed all of them (including AH & JD) not to look at Social Media.

@nintendogamingchannel1007

2 жыл бұрын

@@KaribeCuebas I thought just got Jury not Parties (Johnny Depp, Amber Heard)

@jrjr9358

2 жыл бұрын

The legal system is broken, but that's beside the point ... "harmless error", etc., but 90 percent of cases reversed on appeal and get retried come out with the opposite result -- that's how devastating a judge's rulings are ... but let's look at just a couple rulings/items: 1. Allowing in Settlement Negotiations made by Heard's lawyer in her divorce case. Will lawyers anywhere be able to try to settle cases in the future knowing that all their settlement communications may be used against their clients? 2. Failing to pay charity pledges. Unbelievable. 3. When Depp's able lawyers (superior and better connected than Heard's, obviously. Who pro hoc viced them? And where did they find their experts? and Heard's team their "experts"? Did her lawyers have much trial experience? Didn't appear so. I had a lousy expert once and when you have one you lose.) ... When his able lawyers claimed Heard had recently made up false claims, don't her 2012 statements to therapists have to come in? 4. Lots more, but I don't have time for this and would need to see the records anyway, and jury instructions. What did you think of the judge's jury instructions counsel? And isn't this just all a story of the richer and more powerful winning? Didn't Ruppert Murdock's company/paper win in London? And Depp won here. Is it just a matter of us English speakers having the best justice system money can buy? (Oh, and it's obvious to me that Depp's "PR people" paid trolls to stoke the social media fire (and I am sure there are some "organic" ones too. that's what happens when you have a lot of money creating that and such a popular figure as Depp. I love lots of his work. I didn't know who she was until this trial, but it does appear she's being picked on. Oh, and what is the required analysis in Virginia to allow cameras in the courtroom. That seems a very poor decision by this jurist who appeared unqualified to handle such a case. What do you think?

@elonmusket6178

2 жыл бұрын

Also, don’t forget that Amber literally told the Jury to “look her up” when she was complaining about how the internet is making fun of her testimony.

Thank you for approaching this in a respectful way.

@robertbyrnelawyer

2 жыл бұрын

My pleasure!

She never submitted medical records of the actual assaults telling a psychologist would be completely different then medical treatment from my view as a survivor of vicious assaults... The cameras showed Amber's arrogance to questioning & her acting skills

MSM media: Amber got a raw deal. This has a "chilling effect" on female victims. Knowledgeable Lawyers: No she didn't. She got a fair trial and she lost.

@AJ-kb9hf

2 жыл бұрын

Based on the information to hand, I think the jury was very fair. Heard was awarded $2m. Heard has been proven to be a liar who subjected JD to DV. How is Elaine etc going to prove the elements required to bring an appeal? I doubt very much that she will succeed. Time to go home!

@annemary9680

2 жыл бұрын

It has a chilling effect on lying psycho women who will now think twice about making false accusations since there's now the threat of consequences. And all HONEST women should be happy about this. I've personally seen how false accusations have destroyed men and their faith in honest women still existing.

@AJ-kb9hf

2 жыл бұрын

@@annemary9680 this is the thing - women like Heard destroy men and good men lose faith in all women.

Cameras should be in every court room so they can’t skew the media like they continue to do now. Ty for your breakdown!

@macmcleod1188

2 жыл бұрын

I've been honestly shocked at how CNN and nowthisnews have basically ignored the jury, and the obvious evidence of mrs. Heard lying under oath, and posted that Amber Heard was in the right. It's almost as bad as Fox News with regard to ignoring reality.

Very insightful for all of us who followed the trial.! Thank you Counselor. 🙌🏼🙌🏼

From what others have said, there seems to be a law or statute in Virginia that if she wants to appeal, she has to put up a bond equal to the award in the trial - in this case, $10,350,000. If this is the case, it's impossible for her to appeal, as she has no way of producing that much money.

The only person to let the Jury know what was going on in the outside world was Amber herself by saying what the major public opinion was including death threats. It did not sway the jury one bit and the first trial in England was against the newspaper not Amber.

@thekitowl

2 жыл бұрын

You couldn’t find a judge with more connections to the Sun newspaper than the one they used.

@annanikia7949

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, the UK was defamation against the rag The Sun. The US case was against the Washington Post article presented by Amber.

@thekitowl

2 жыл бұрын

@@annanikia7949 the UK was a libel action against the sun, this is Deformation against Ms Turd.

@harshithakeerti

2 жыл бұрын

And the Twitter hashtags and twitter expert

@jennipeach2565

2 жыл бұрын

You are so spot on...Amber did not win the UK case because Johnny went up against The Sun...not Amber.

AH's legal team lost, because AH lied about almost everything. Her legal team took the case because they thought it would good publicity, BIG ERROR!!

I am so sick of Elaine and AH entire team continues to insult the intelligence of the judge and jurors! And how dare her say that social media influenced the jurors when all the evidence was presented in court for all to hear and see! Look JD was proven innocent on all domestic/sexual abuse..AH is guilty of prejury and assault ..and that's it! Her team needs to move on ..they are ridiculous to keep this horrible event on going! Enough is enough!

Elaine: How can you not see the lies, logical fallacies, & slippery, self-serving "reasoning" coming from your client (and, by extension) + now, by you? How can you NOT?

I'm no expert, but it seems to me that Elaine is walking a thin line that might verge of some kind of violation or reprimand, in that she's going on national TV and essentially implying that the jury--and perhaps the judge--were incompetent. The ABA may be interested in a closer look. Second, another law channel online pointed out the BOTH parties WON. Amber didn't get the $$ that she had wanted, but there was still one count with which the jury agreed. Amber blurted out on the stand that she wrote the op-ed "because of Johnny"...so, there's that... Plus, doesn't she have to post a bond for the appeal? IMHO, the Depp team had a short, gracious statement after the trial, and isn't making the circuit, which I think is extremely professional. Amber's team is coming across as sore losers, and they should just chalk up the losses and move on. But, it certainly looks like SOMEBODY wants their "15 minutes of fame"! LOL

@nmedina7978

2 жыл бұрын

Rosetta Stone. In my opinion, if she was going to appeal then she should have done it instead of making a public announcement. What I'm thinking is far out there BUT maybe she is saying that they have proof of 12 counts of DV so Johnny will pay them what they want to stop Elaine from doing the appeal because she knows he doesn't want to go through another exhausting trial.

@Sassyglbeauty

2 жыл бұрын

I’m sure the Depp attorneys prob wanna not speak until all appeals have been completed, etc. They don’t wanna do anything to possibly contaminate the verdict. They know they r dealing with snakes.

@shonnamay8331

2 жыл бұрын

Her unprofessionalism is troubling. She also behaves unstable. Her license to practice law should be revoked.

@Ilovegrunge123

2 жыл бұрын

@@nmedina7978 And yet he is going to go through another one in July someone is suing him because of a suppose fight when he was filming city of lies.

@onangelwings462

2 жыл бұрын

🎯💯

A lot of "evidence" from her devices was not allowed because they couldn't authenticate the stuff because of how Amber's legal team was trying to do it. They wanted to allow in doctored photos and varying other shopped and invented "evidence".

@torilan2672

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, if these photos weren’t let in, that means that they’re manipulated.

@noneofyourbeeswax01

2 жыл бұрын

It also works both ways - the defence team got stuff suppressed - such as direct evidence that Amber Heard gave that video to TMZ... did you see the way they nearly had a heart attack, jumping up to object when it looked for a moment that the witness was going to describe the link for the video? And it was so obvious that Kate Moss's testimony was very tightly limited to answering questions solely about the alleged stairs incident. In fact both sides would have made many stipulations, and that's on them.

@traceygeer797

2 жыл бұрын

She wouldn’t give up her phone to check out all her nasty text messages and other crap

@chrismalcomson7640

2 жыл бұрын

I was shocked the judge allowed photoshopped images of injuries to be shown. Without these ambiguous images Ambers team would have had an even bigger task to prove her accusations were true. As team Jonny showed only too clearly, these images don't stand up to scrutiny, especially when one image was submitted twice for different events..

@NittyByGritty-7

2 жыл бұрын

They just want to cheat and Amber is ruining their career’s and lives too! Unbelievable, AH probably punched Elaine in the gut and ordered her to go on media rounds! Seriously, I can see that happening

Thank you so much. I've always enjoyed hearing about legal rulings but never knew anything about appeals and the appellate court system. Very helpful!!

So the jurors were influenced by social media. The viewers were mesmerized by Johnny did I get this right. Or was it just Amber caught in a 100 lies that did it smh.