Explained with great clarity. Thnx

Well explained ... Brilliant lecture.... Great service to legal fraternity🙏🙏.... Expect more from you sir.

Simple ang good covering areas. Appreciated. Thanks.

Balaji has instructed in a very simple manner. Expecting more from him

Greetings. Thank you very much.for in-depth information..Interesting. Request: Will for single people. Trust within will? Importance of will, family defination for single person....

Young adv,and goddess saraswathi bless him for delivers excellent speech

Excellent lecture explaining the legal requirementsin a simple manner.

Great lecture with excellent clarity..Thank you...

Very very important information for all public in short time. More lecture by sir is solicited required on different topic. Thank u sir.

Great stuff Boss.

Thanks to sh balaji and sh Vikas for excellent Lecture..

Excellent session. Thanks.

Great sir. Well said

Nicely explained.

Thank u sir excellent lecture

Thankful

Excellent sir

It is section 72(3) of companies act not 79(3) nomination. Correct me if I am wrong. But overall the session was wonderful. Great bank of knowledge. My reverence

You Right appreciated correctness. What about challenging Will ?

Revocation is asked for certificate of probate or judgment delivered before issuing certificate. Limitation will be applicable from date of certificate or judgment.

Great quote. You can live a life without a lawyer but you cannot die without a lawyer..😂😂😂

Very informative session 19.8.20

outstanding lecture in such a short time. Please accept my thanks

When a person makes two will and does not cancel the effects of first will, will the second will can get cancelled

Please tell us a little bit more about codicils.

Whats the court fee to file for letter of administration?

On the subject of Nominee, what if the Nominee shifts funds into their own account prior to the person's death? is there a recourse on such an act. In this scenario let's assume the person in question is very sick.

Can a person execute two different wills at two different times for two different sets of properties? Even in this case, will only the second will prevail and the properties mentioned in the first will devolve by natural succession? Or, both wills shall remain valid?

@balajipb2987

4 жыл бұрын

There is no harm and in fact valid to execute two separate wills in respect of two different properties. They will be Last Wills in so far as the respective properties are concerned. Only thing you may need to be careful is that there is no clash or overlap of properties between the two Wills in which case the later clause in the later Will would prevail.

@balajipb2987

4 жыл бұрын

Certainly, you can execute different Wills for different properties and they would be treated as Last Wills in so far as the respective properties

@nishikantmhatre815

3 жыл бұрын

Mr. Balaji in revocation of Will in Cort Judge pass Order that defendent to give Inspection of documents. But more than six months over the defendants had not given any inspection of documents what will be the next step ❓ Please guide me

Security.. for females in India is on roads esp. widows at young age with burden of female child born before 9th Sept. 2005.

Does the term shares of company also hold good for a list of shares held in a PMS account by the deceased who dies intestate?

@ujjwalaa1208

2 жыл бұрын

Sir, awaiting your valuable reply to my serious query. Please respond

if there is no will how will first class legal heir claim for the property

Sir what is TAHANama

Thanks

@BeyondLawCLC

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you

@vasanthakumara1606

2 жыл бұрын

Lucid Lecture on an Important n Complicated Subject . Thanks , Sir .,

Mother in her affidavit on Rs. 200/- stamp in tahashildar office had complained of pressurised signatures taken by her twin daughters on some papers during. her fractured leg condition and she has not written any will deed to anybody. Mother was carried on stretchers to registration office in Bhavani MANTAP, Kolhapur by the beneficiaries. Witnesses were beneficiarys husband's neear friends to whom one of beneficiary told

Myth story from coercion oriented partition in compromise decree, applied in will and told to witnesses by beneficiaries who were from their sides,

GM Sir, Dada ne property purchase Kari. Unko koi Ladka nahi tha toh unhone apne real brother ke Ladka ko adopt kar liye . Adopt Karne ke baad mere Dada ki death ho gayi, property khasra mein meri Dadi ka naam lag gaye. Jab meri dadi ka naam khasra mein laga tab tak mera birth ho chuka tha par mere younger brother ka birth nahi hua tha.Dadi ki death ke baad khasra mein mere papa ka naam lag gaye aur mere papa ne puri property ki registered will mere younger brother ke naam par kar di. Abb mere pita ki death ho chuki hain. Abb mein Kya Karu.

@Mr18081964

2 жыл бұрын

Your brother should be kind with you. If he doesn't you can suit the file and challenge the will

The story narrated in the will is not true but myth also told the same by the beneficiaries to the witnesses who are from beneficiarys side, who believed to discard a single heir out of four.

Looking at question, audience is unread.

दादा ने प्रॉपर्टी परचेज कि उनको कोई संतान नहीं थी, तो उन्होंने अपने रियल ब्रदर के बेटे को अडॉप्ट कर लिया, अडॉप्ट करने के बाद मेरे दादा की डेथ हो गई। प्रॉपर्टी खसरा में मेरी दादी का नाम लग गया जब मेरी दादी का नाम खसरा में लगा तब तक मेरा बर्थ हो चुका था पर मेरे यंगर ब्रदर का बर्थ नहीं हुआ था। दादी की डेथ के बाद खसरा में मेरे पापा का नाम लग गया और मेरे पापा ने पूरी प्रॉपर्टी की रजिस्टर्ड विल मेरे छोटे भाई के नाम पर कर दी अब मेरे पिता की डेथ हो चुकी है अब मुझे क्या करना चाहिए। (Madhya Pradesh) Ab Mujhe yah puchna hai ki kya Mere papa ko vasiyat Karne Ka Adhikar tha

One of the beneficiary told myth and non factual story from an coercion compromise decree not of mutual agreement, not practical only theoretical partition, myth story, never given possession or key, key still today is with one of the beneficiary whose husband is a villain, goondda coming with goons to show off his male, muscle and money power to seek roof of a widow with a bachelor daughter I. e. I and my daughter who were staying along with mother. Partition shown in court was without free will but under undue influence to a widow because she has daughter, no son, but same myth story, applied same coercioned, not factual story making it a reason to discard one of the legal heir out of four applying it in will deed making will deed also non factual? Myth? Not genuine? Not valid as reason to discard a legal heir from other three is non factual but was only of pressurised signature theoretical and never really given possession or of not considering her real wish of what she feels to her feeling what I want.