Very well explained in clear Terms, the DELAY in Exam. of Witness under sec. 161 CrPC , Validating it with the most Appropriate citations - which works well with the Judges in TRIAL. Thanks SIR Jee.

Thanks a lot for the citations...Ram kumar sir always gives the citations...This is the best about him...

@rameshkumarsahoo8628

Ай бұрын

❤g

Sir highly informative as a witness has falsely given oral evidence which they cannot prove without any proof or related to the said case and occurance of exact details and just making up they own version not mentioned in the charge sheet against the accused and need to be examinationd by the advocate to prove that the witness is falsely claiming to be in knowledge of the said case and giving evidence for they own gain to mislead the honourable court to chest the accused by disposing falsely as a property issue is going on the gain false mileage wrongfully and this witness cannot be trusted.thank you sir Very much for personal and public advise is welcome and help by all legal experts.

@BeyondLawCLC

10 күн бұрын

Glad you found it useful.

Contradiction excellently explained .... Very aptly citations quoted.... Sir you have absolute clarity of the concept and have very beautifully explained.....Thanks...

Really grateful to you, really admirable toil, achieve pinnacle

Your series of webinars are really helpful, Thanks a lot 🙏

@BeyondLawCLC

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for appreciating

What an excellent Session. Very apt questions and to the point answers given by justice... Thanks to organizers. 🙏

@BeyondLawCLC

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for your kind words

Excellent Articulation And Enriching Marvellous Debate. Thank you very much Sir.

Wonderful lecture which is of practical use. Looking forward for the Part -2 of this lecture tommorrow 7th July 2021

No words for such insightful initiative . Thank you will be too little 🙏

@BeyondLawCLC

3 жыл бұрын

So true ,his knowledge sharing process is simple and good

Section 145 of Indian evidence act is reproduced verbatim as Art 140 of Qanoon e Shahdat order 1984 in Pakistan whereas sections 161 & 162 of cr.p.c are exactly same...so this lecture is so illuminating for professionals in Pakistan as well...thank you

@ravikajagar1814

Жыл бұрын

Tq

Excellent interpretation Sir. With Regards Tanmaya Mishra, LL.M , Advocate ଜୟ ଜଗନ୍ନାଥ जय जगन्नाथ*🙏

Fantastic explanations, masters are clear with their imparting knowledge.

Great class thanks a lot

Very valuable for lawyer s

Thank you sir

@BeyondLawCLC

4 ай бұрын

So nice of you

Excelent explanations Sir

Superb sir this is law

Great knowledge

Thanks 🙏

Very good explanation

Very insightful

Very informative lecture.

Eye witness support prosecution case in chief examination . After that in the cross by accused he turn hostile . What is the next procedure to fallow by the prosecutor

Thank you sir for good teaching.sir what is preliminary chargeshet.1

Justice Ramkumar's knowledge is unmatchable.

@BeyondLawCLC

3 жыл бұрын

So true

Great lecture sir

Sir try to arrange one lecture once in a week by ramkumar sir

I like malayali judge's they are very nice

Excellent

Love you. Sir

Wonderful minds to share knowledge

@BeyondLawCLC

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for appreciating

Done Watched

Nice

How to get note

Very beautiful

so eloquent and fantastic lecture

@BeyondLawCLC

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for appreciating

Sir please make a lecture on proclamation and attachment under crpc and also on maintainace u/s 125-128

Done complete 20 july 2021 thanks

Learnt a lot indeed ...so enlightening lecture

Good

Superb Sir 🙏

@BeyondLawCLC

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you

Sir, in a pocso case, the victim had given a totally different version from she stated before the police. She had already been crossexamined by the previous defence counsel, but the contradictions was not put to her. Now a new counsel has entered but the court is not allowing to recall her U/s 311 Crpc, stating that she is a victim and cannot be victimizated. Can the contradictions brought out from the I/o of the case .

Improvements in previous statement is considered very damaging for the worth of the statement of a witness...imprisonment s shake & devalue the statement..such witness is not relied upon if his/her statement carries dishonest improvements...

Sir. S .161 and the mandate therein to avoid the tendency to incriminate runs counter to the person including the accused.

How to mark the passage from 161 CrPC statement for the purpose of contradiction, if during cross examination witness completely rejects his 161 CrPC statement saying "I don't know what police has written, this is not the statement I gave, police have completely changed my version"

Air 1988 Indira Gandhi case Death of kin and kith ,Delay can be explained.

I shall be glad if any one can say identical provisions of Indian Criminal Procedure Code are in the British Criminal Procedure Code ?. After all Cr. P.C..is a colonial legislation which is a Bible for Indian legislatures even after about more than 150 years.

Tahasildar singhv vs up about contradiction.