Let's be honest : the 1933 version is a masterpiece but King Kong had a weird smile.

@allfancomicgeeks25

4 жыл бұрын

Both are Masterpiece but I'm leaning more toward the 2005 version

@LuckyShark_Buddy

2 жыл бұрын

Think about it without King Kong 1933 we would not have Godzilla or any giant monster movies that you know today

7:41 to 7:57 perfect sync

The dinosaur fight in the remake shows how much Peter Jackson loved the original

@disneyknightspadilla1406

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah I like it too. Later the vastosaurus Rex became a fan favorite villain.

2005 King Kong had so much effort put into it, took a very long time to make, and tried to make it as close to the original. But then stupid critics come in saying “oh it’s too long” are you kidding? You liked titanic, and that movie was nearly 4 hours. You liked gone with the wind, and that was 4 hours. But then you say King Kong 2005 is bad, because it’s too long? It’s shorter then titanic and gone with the wind, yet you liked those films? People can be really stupid sometimes.

That is a creepy smile @10:48 (1933 King Kong)

@bradleyrenfroe2776

4 жыл бұрын

The 1976 Kong had a Creepier Smile.

@MultiKamil97

3 жыл бұрын

It's kinda funny that 1933 Kong looks happy being caught in chains while 2005 version looks sad and hopeless.

@Videomaker-pz4xm

Жыл бұрын

King Kong back then was supposed to be scary

The T REX fight is/was remade EXACTLY the same as in 1933 THAT'S AWESOME

this is a remake done right

@AJ-cq5pw

6 жыл бұрын

Nemesis_The_Zombie_King Agreed!

@philr5497

6 жыл бұрын

With the exception being a miscast Jack Black, the only flaw, but huge.

@InFiRe59

4 жыл бұрын

@@philr5497 What? He's amazing?

@philr5497

4 жыл бұрын

@@InFiRe59 He's Jack Black

@InFiRe59

4 жыл бұрын

@@philr5497 He is a good actor

the end to the trex fight is spot on close

Side-by-Side series directory here: mattskuta.com/sbs/ Comment to help me choose my next side-by-side: Psycho (1960/1998) Cabin Fever (2002/2016) The Great Gatsby (1974/2013) Open Your Eyes (1997)/Vanilla Sky (2001) Romeo and Juliet (1936/1968/1996/2013) Animal Farm (1954/1999) The BFG (1989/2016) Avatar: The Last Airbender(2003)/The Last Airbender (2010) Cinderella (1950/2015) Clash of the Titans (1981/2010) Nosferatu (1922)/Nosferatu the Vampyre (1979) The Shining (1980/1997) Ghost in the Shell (1995/2017) The Jungle Books (1994/2016)

I remember seeing the remake in the theater with my 81 year old grandfather and 78 year old grandmother (dad's parents and now 96 and 93 as of yesterday. They were born on the same day, but different years. X,D) back when I was 11. They actually said/think the remake is better than the original. If you're wondering why my actual parents didn't take me, it's because both of them had to go out of town on business trips and they gave me the choice of going with them or staying with my grandparents for the week.

10:47 King Kong 1933: *Smiles* King Kong 2005: Crowd Claps

I loved the original.

Thanks for this. TWO terrific films.

Bravo, Matt!!!! it's unbelievable the excellent work you have made!! Most impressive - Greetings from Lima, Peru, May 2, 2019

1933 music by Max Steiner

I didn’t even realize how similar they are

@jesminenu8648

3 жыл бұрын

O jp9vkvkb oh citvk

the trex scene is spot on!

Masterpiece

The remake isn't as good as the original, but I admire PJ's admiration for the original film and you can tell that he really gave it his all making the film. He even went to the lengths to recreate the missing Spider Pit Sequence (1933 style) with the team at Weta Workshop.

@bradleyrenfroe2776

4 жыл бұрын

People should realize Kong 2005 is a Love Letter to the Original.

2005 the bets

love your comparison videos!! awesome dude

me quedo con las dos películas. ..buena comparación...él mejor king kong...

Good video👍 In the movie of 2005 the indians are more salvages than the original version

Incredible! Thanks for sharing

Have you notice in the 1933 version that Kong was smiling while in 2005 is not 10:48

@firebazethekaiju-brony6617

5 жыл бұрын

Nick Lim I already noticed that but I love both but I think 2005 has a more badass design while 1933 was a scary design

@idkwhatsmyname7925

5 жыл бұрын

yes

@bradleyrenfroe2776

4 жыл бұрын

@@firebazethekaiju-brony6617 Both Films had different intents that way.

@Videomaker-pz4xm

Жыл бұрын

@@firebazethekaiju-brony6617 King Kong was meant to be scary in the 1930s he was seen as a villain back then

Great comparison

i was born in 2005

I feel sad that kong died😭

Both films are masterpieces that I absolutely love! But the remake (2005) is easily the best!

Both are equally good films

You should do this with Psycho and Beauty and the Beast when it comes out on blu ray

How About For Godzilla (1954/1998/2016) side-by-side comparison?

I love both equally but i do prefer the original from 1933. I think they are both good equally but A: the 1933 film is a lot more influential, B: i watched it first so i have a bit of a bias, C: i think the 1933 has less filler then the 2005 version, D: it has inspired me to be a filmmaker like so many people before me, so i have to give some props to that. I don't hate anyone who prefers the 2005 film over the 1933 film, i just prefer the original.

Without the original king kong 1933 there is no kingkong 2005

I'm in the year 2021

The 2005 version is so much better that anyone who thinks the 1933 version is better needs a good slap!

@bradleyrenfroe2776

4 жыл бұрын

No, you Casuals need a good slap for disrespecting one of Cinema's Pioneer Films. You guys do not know anything. This Movie was forgotten within a year while Kong 1933 is one of the Pioneer Films. While Kong 2005 is by no means a bad Film, those of you who Insult the Original are just as bad as Godzilla 1998 fans, yeah I just went there. So you people just need to get off of the Internet, that would make it a better place because people like you are a Cancer to these Fandoms.

@JesusGomez-ob2qt

3 жыл бұрын

@@bradleyrenfroe2776 lmfao this remake is literally better in every single God damn way

@thegoodreylo4749

3 жыл бұрын

@@bradleyrenfroe2776 The 1933 movie Pioneered it, but it wasn’t perfect. The 2005 film added much more layers, including the fact that Ann ACTUALLY LOVED KONG, and the visuals were updated to feel more realistic. HOW DARE YOU COMPARE KONG 2005 TO THAT TRASH 1998 GODZILLA!!!!!!!

@TheKevinKruger

3 жыл бұрын

@@bradleyrenfroe2776 I do agree with you. I also appreciate both practical and CGI, practical shows that there was still a way to do effects, and King Kong (1933) is no exception.

@franciscojavier8982

Жыл бұрын

Bill Murray, perhaps you are the one who needs more than one slap for having no respect, for not having education and for being arrogant.

Too bad Jackson didn't stick more closely to the original's narrative. What ruined his version for me was the extreme overkill.

When King Kong 1933 shouted at the Airplanes the 2005 King Kong didn't shout the same way

why no comparison with the 1976 film ??

and people say 2005 kong was terrible, even though it did what 1976 kong failed to do in it's remake.

@AJ-cq5pw

6 жыл бұрын

ghost fantasy I don't get how people say it's terrible. I mean it's one thing to say it's not as good as the original which I don't agree but terrible? Come on.

I like the movie KING KONG 2005

i remember when i saw 2005 mvie when i was a little kid. the reason why i wanted to see it was because im a fan of Jack Black. any other early 2000s kids saw it just cuz of Jack Black?

@nickpan7108

4 жыл бұрын

I was born in 2005 so....

@MultiKamil97

3 жыл бұрын

I think that I first played the King Kong game by Ubisoft somewhere around 2005-2006 because there was a demo that was released shortly after or before the film. I knew about the film then, because I saw trailers but I never really had a chance to see it in the cinema unfortunately which I strongly regret. I thought my teacher would take my class to see it but it never happened hah

I like the video but come on really the music tho

Music:James Newton Howard(2005) Lyrics:Stephen Schwartz

@jimmymccartney2049

11 ай бұрын

Directed by:Peter Jackson

@jimmymccartney2049

11 ай бұрын

1933

The 2005 king kong could be very well the greatest movie ever

@AJ-cq5pw

6 жыл бұрын

pedro roque One of the greatest for sure!

@philr5497

6 жыл бұрын

Wrecked due to Black being miscast.

@AJ-cq5pw

6 жыл бұрын

The only thing that maybe set it back is the length of the time they were on the boat. That's it. Jack Black to me wasn't really that miscast. He added humor to the movie.

@papodenerd3839

5 жыл бұрын

Pedro roque verdade

@markymark5198

5 жыл бұрын

2017 was better in my opinion. The story telling. The pace. The design of kong was by far my favorite from any film. 1933 is my 2nd favorite. Idk i just didnt like the 05 one very much. Peter jacksons kong design i didnt like at all. While it did look more like an actual gorilla then any other kong, he just was too small for me ( i think he was the smallest out of all of them) and he was way to chubby he didnt look muscular at all to me.

The second one

2005 one will always be the best. I don't care what anyone says. The new one, Kong: Skull Island was not that good to me. Was way too fast, not enough character development and just not as great. Wasn't bad but it was alright.

@bradleyrenfroe2776

6 жыл бұрын

NO the 1933 one will always be the best

@AJ-cq5pw

6 жыл бұрын

Bradley Renfroe that’s your opinion. That one to me sucks so....

@rabidsquirrel4702

5 жыл бұрын

1933 is waaayy better

@AJ-cq5pw

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah way better as a comedy

@shaggyrogers7986

5 жыл бұрын

2017 and 2005 blow 1933 out of water

2:34

my friends birhtday was this day

5:20

It’s very sad end🥺🥺🥺😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

You Forgot 1976 One With Jeff Bridges. Oh Yeah They Have No Similar Plot. The Film Crew Are Just Ocean Oil Miners And The Blonde Is A Castaway They Rescued.

@restlessbohemian26

5 жыл бұрын

Best one of the three.

@souryajitganguly4523

Жыл бұрын

​@@restlessbohemian26 i also admit it

A

7:53 if someone likes dinosaurs 🦖

The remake is a wonderful perfect modern copy and I would have loved it save one huge error, Denham as portrayed by Jack Black in the 2005 film. Jack is Jack...

Oi

Will you play one came home❤

Peter Jackson's Kong would have been fine if he could have restrained himself. The original is a damn near perfect film, and part of what makes it so perfect is that it is beautifully paced. There is no bloat, no excess. Everything that happens has a point that serves the story. But Jackson couldn't restrain himself... EVERYTHING had to be bloated to excess. Instead of one rampaging brontosaurus, it's a whole stampede! Instead of fighting one T. rex, it's three! Instead of one pterodactyl, it's a whole flock. The original spider pit sequence was cut for a reason. Everything in Jackson's film had to be over-the-top dramatic poses, slow motion deaths, and bloody five hours long. Less is more, man. Less is more.

@philr5497

6 жыл бұрын

Probably more time and a bigger budget would have increased the populations of the original .

@tvbnine793

5 жыл бұрын

About the brontosaurus scene, the remake has way more accurate dinosaurs, since back in the 30s they didn't know brontos were herd dwelling terrestrial herbivores, thus having it be one solitary lake hunter

@shaggyrogers7986

5 жыл бұрын

John, it is not.

@shaggyrogers7986

5 жыл бұрын

Sure, budget was shit, it's Black and white and is King Kong big toy? Lmao and before you go OH IT WAS MADE IN 1933 THUS ,ITS BUDGET, ANIMATION AND KING KONG WON'T BE AS GOOD AS 2005. That's the point. :) Thus, it's not near perfect movie.Thus 2005 and 2017 are much better. And before you go GRAPHICS DON'T MATTER, THERE ARE BETTER MOVIES IN 1940 ( true, but goes either way). Technology is advancing, of course today movies are much better than movies in 1990's and 90's were much better than 40's.That's how it goes. Movies are gettign better and better. Bring 100 people to watch this movie or 2005 and 2017. 90 will choose new and 2005 one, because it's advanced, better, HD, better sound, Kong is actually alive and not a toy. But I can already see your argument being " OH OLD MOVIES HAVE BETTER CHARM THAN NEW ONES, IN NEW ONES IT'S ALL ABOUT CASH" and what old ones weren't :)?.

@superhighgaming5258

5 жыл бұрын

Well i for one love that he added that spider sequence and also loved that he added two more t rexs just for the fact it showed off how badass kong is able to juggle a girl and three trexs at the same time is awsome and I feel like the brontosaurus scene was neccessary because if i would have seen a brontosaurus eat someone I would have laughed just like I did when I first watched the original now I know thats, not the fault of the original they didnt have much info on the dino but still its laughable and I loved how jackson handle that in the remake and same goes to the pterodactyl scene now there could have been alot of other ways to handle it but when I watch them fall in the original I know they should have died as close as they were to the cliffside I gurantee that wasn't deep enough for them to land in but in the remake he just grabs one of the little guys lol I mean again he could have done it a differnt way but I love how the movie is its own thing but pay so much respect to the orignal i love the 05 remake

King Kong is too damn stubborn to just let Ann go!

2005 is better; a rare example of the remake beating the original!

@bradleyrenfroe2776

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah ,NO!

@thegoodreylo4749

3 жыл бұрын

@@bradleyrenfroe2776 YES!!

@Bustingorrytitan

Ай бұрын

I think there equal but thats me.

Where's 1970s one

Go King Kong 2005

I'll give 2005 some points for Naomi Watts (not knocking Faye Wray), but Jack Black was a piss poor Carl Denham.

Poor kong better if they just get the giant ape back to skull island instead of killing him

1933 all day everyday!

@bradleyrenfroe2776

4 жыл бұрын

Damn Straight. The 2005 Version is a loving homage to the Original so I give it Props for that.

Scene copying before 2005

This remake doesn't hold a candle to the original!

@KingKong19100

7 жыл бұрын

The remake is way better than the original.

@canceritself1854

6 жыл бұрын

KingKong19100 Pffff, and you call yourself a King Kong fan.

@NaudVanDalen

6 жыл бұрын

Hahahaha!

@canceritself1854

6 жыл бұрын

Diabeetus Man The 2005 Kong is a really great movie, I think a lot better f elements can be better than the original.

@LightStreak567

6 жыл бұрын

Charles River The remake wasn't trying to outshine the original, it paid respects to it.

🐒

Jackson's film, although a work of love, is overblown.

Why does the 2005 Kong fly around like a ballet dancer? Doesn't CGI or motion capture have a sense of weight? With all the hype about the 2005 Kong being more "realistic", it certainly doesn't seem that way to me.

@LaughingGravy31

7 жыл бұрын

I agree. And the action scenarios are just ridiculous and cartoon like in '05.

@LaughingGravy31

7 жыл бұрын

Go back to your silly cartoons.

@LaughingGravy31

7 жыл бұрын

No but you can rub them out with an eraser lolololol

@anirudhmenon4234

7 жыл бұрын

Man, go fuck yourself. The 2005 version looks way better.

@LaughingGravy31

7 жыл бұрын

I said cartoons you dumb ass.

That CGI video game bullshit looks so fucking fake it's pathetic. What happened to man made, hard work, three dimensional craftsmanship?

@TheKevinKruger

3 жыл бұрын

It went extinct

@HobieBrown97

Жыл бұрын

You're A fool

5:34