History of Ukraine - kzread.info/dash/bejne/rH6q3JV6mZy2oNo.html

Honestly thank you Jazby your videos are greatly appreciated

Im from Malaysia and I love eastern european history. Good one as always Jabzy

Wow even if I'm not interested in a topic you make it so entertaining and informative, love your vids thanks for making them

Another great video! Keep up the great work!

Great work. I hope that there will be more collaborations in the future

Amazingly informative 💯💯

God, your pronunciation is so much better than in earlier videos. Keep it up

@BloodRider1914

3 жыл бұрын

Just keep in mind, Balti is pronounced as buhlts

@iuriepripa3171

3 жыл бұрын

@@BloodRider1914 He wasn't referencing Bălți, he was referencing the Battle of Batih.

Great video! Thanks

Hey I enioy your content. Some times it is hard to follow events too far between regions or timelines, so could you group them in playlists?

Thank u. Very nice.

Can you review, "The Angolan Civil War (1975 - 2002)?"

Both sides of the conflict during the rebellion were probably predominantly Ruthenian. I'd say it was more of a rich polonized Сatholic Ruthenian magnates(as well as probably many lesser Ruthenian Orthodox and Uniate nobles, as there were actually quite a lot of people that thought similarly to Adam Kisiel, who supported the Polish crown in this conflict, despite being an Orthodox Ruthenian nobleman; a pretty tragic figure) and their private armies vs the lesser Orthodox nobility and burghers in a form of Cossacks, rather than some Ruthenian rebellion against Poland. So it's more economically and a bit religiously driven, rather than culturally. When advancing into the Polish areas the Cossacks also tried to make the Polish peasants join the rebellion, sending letters and calling the to rise up against the opressive nobility, but failed. The nobles(mostly Polish) in PLC were generally huge asses towards the commoners(kings were usually useless in PLC and generally failed to control the nobility) and even came up with Sarmatism to justify their superiority to the common folk, whom they regarded to be of a lesser, Slavic stock, while many nobles claimed to have descended from either Turkic or nomad Iranic peoples, such as Scythnians or Sarmatians. Some of the Ruthenian and Lithuanian nobles got influenced by this tradition and also traced their ancestry to Roxolani, Scythians and Khazars. But generally it wasn't really as popular amongst them(unless they were polonized; but then again, in that case they just became Poles) as it was amongst the Poles.

@alekshukhevych2644

3 жыл бұрын

It was mostly Ruthenians vs Poles but some or the things you wrote are factual.

@SzalonyKucharz

2 жыл бұрын

Also, let us not forget the role of Helena Czaplińska in that conflict. While not suggesting that her being a love interest and bone of contention between both Chmielnicki and Koniecepolski's subordinate, Daniel Czapliński was the main or major cause of the Uprising, the latter's raid on Chmielnicki's chutor in Subotów and capture of Helena was no small matter.

@Hadar1991

2 жыл бұрын

I never heard about about Polish nobility tracing back their ancestor from Turkish people, only from Sarmatians, who where Iranian people. Besides until the wars of middle 17th century (of which this video talks about) Polish peasantry was relatively wealthy and in quite good relations with the nobility. Tension started to rose after Swedes demolished the country (PLC GDP after that war collapse 1/3 if I recall correctly). Nonetheless PLC did not have any peasant rebellions until Russian troops stationed and patrolled the country, because before it there was a non-written rule that if landowner was to oppressive then he could escape to another landowner and work for him and the first one did not have the authority to do anything to the other. When the Russian troops enter, they started to patrol and catch fleeing peasant so nobles could execute all fringe laws because the risk of peasant fleeing where much smaller. So peasantry in PLC had 3 stages: - 1569-1654 wealthy, so serf could hire and pay landless people to help, - 1655-1763 economy ruined by war, the situation of serf worsen but usually landowner could not be to oppressive, because serf could flee, - 1764-1795 Russian patrols cut down fleeing of serf and nobles could overuse the serfs. You cannot just describe situation of serfs in the 18th century and say that for whole time PLC existed serfs were over-exploited. Especially before the Swedish Deluge.

@claudianisipasu4014

Жыл бұрын

It's true that Czaplinski wounded badly HHmelnitsky's don, Yuri?

Just to be clear, there was no Hetman of the Sitch. The Hetmanate and the Sitch were always two distinct entities that quite often competed or were antagonistic to each other

@SzalonyKucharz

2 жыл бұрын

Of course there was! The chief officer of the Sitch's title was Kish Otaman (Кошовий отаман, Ataman koszowy). Until the establishment of the Cossack Hetmanate after the Treaty of Perejesław and subsequent split of the Cossack Realm to Hetmanate with its seat of government in Czechryń and the Free Army of the Lower Zaporozhia, the titles of otaman and hetman were used interchangeably.

@dwarow2508

Жыл бұрын

@@SzalonyKucharz So you admit that there was no Hetman of the Sitch. Hetman =/= Ataman. An Ataman is a domestic Cossack leader, a Hetman is a rank in the Polish army mostly attributed to Cossack mercenaries.

I was showing this video to my dad and he was so confused. Khemlnytsky is a typical weird Slavic name that isn't pronounced the way it is spelled. The Kh is not a strong K, but a soft one, and sounds more like Hell, then Kell

@SzalonyKucharz

2 жыл бұрын

Kh is supposed to be pronounced as voiceless h [IPA: x], not plosive k or k-h or soft k. Soft k is kʲ and this sound is absent in either Polish or Ukrainian phonetics. Macedonian has that sound though. Softening of k or t leads to ć/ci in Polish [IPA: t͡ɕ] Neither the sound or the name is weird. It is a regular consonant in all Slavic languages, with the Latin Slavic script denoting it as 'ch' not 'kh', and the Cyrillic script using x: chleb, хлеб - bread; chmiel, хмель - hop; chan, хан - khan. Хмелнiцкiи/Chmielnicki means 'of Hopsville'. Yes, 'c' is to pronounced as t͡s, so the name spells in International Phonological Alphabet as xmiɛlɲit͡ski (Polish pronunciation) or xmʲɛlʲɲit͡skiʲ (Ukrainian pronunciation). Spelling in Slavic orthographies is very regular, regardless of individual languages and scripts used, Latin or Cyrillic. The problem is when English speakers think their spelling rules make perfect sense. Or is it 'sence'? Or 'sens'?

Whole lot of death over that damn Cross

@goyonman9655

9 ай бұрын

Nah This was the work of Usurers

@yeehaw3792

Ай бұрын

You mean the star of David?

Nice video Jabzy. Nice to see you collaborating with Swibne who I also watch. (Hopefully one day he makes a video on us)

Thank you for the video, but I think you made a mistake in the beginning. King gave Khmelnitsky a warrant saying that the land is his. Koniecpolsky tore that letter and impisoned him thereafter.

Khmelnytsky is fun to say

@thatsameguy956

3 жыл бұрын

It's actually Hmelnytsky Idk the translators always add K to all Ukrainian words that start with H

@heavydirtysoul1491

3 жыл бұрын

@@thatsameguy956 because if a word starts with "H" and the second letter is a consonant then the "H" is not pronounced. that why you've got to add "K". You spell "Khmelnytsky" but "Hetmanat".

@galahad-history

3 жыл бұрын

@@thatsameguy956 Chmielnicki ;)

@SzalonyKucharz

2 жыл бұрын

@@thatsameguy956 Because x is transliterated to Latin script as either ch (West Slavic languages) or kh (English spelling). H is reserved for Ukrainian г. The phonetic difference between the two sounds is that the former is voiceless h, while the latter is voiced, almost glottal h. So in Polish you have Chmielnicki for Хмелнiцкiи and Hadziacz for Гaдяч.

Władysław Waza's policy with Cossacks was so terrible it turned Poland's most faithful soldiers into enemies. Cossack Registry shouldn't have been lovered to the point it doesn't pay off to fight for your country. And lastly Hadziacz Union should have been signed more early. It would have strengthened eastern frontier with Russia and make Cossacks even more willing to stay under Polish Crown. It would change history making Partitions almost unlikely. That's elective monarchy and giving out power to nobility for you...

@strahinjastevic7480

3 жыл бұрын

What if scenarios aren't really worth pondering over, the polish treated non catholic's unfairly as a whole so it would have happened sooner than later

@mixererunio1757

3 жыл бұрын

@@strahinjastevic7480 That's bullshit that comes from not knowing history. Poland was the most tolerant to other religions country in Europe at the time. It was constituted by Warsaw Confederation, one of the first acts in Europe granting religious freedom. And even earlier Statue of Kalisz granted Jews rights they didn't have anywhere else in Europe.

@pavlotretiakov2130

3 жыл бұрын

@@mixererunio1757 in 1455 Commonwealth banned repairnment of old and construction of new orthodox churches, 1596-1597 were held persecutions of orthodox people, who refused to recognize Union of Brest, in 1596(after Union of Brest)-1633 orthodox church was illegal, orthodox priests were expelled from churches, in 1732 the orthodox were forbidden to hold public funerals and religious processions, in 1776 alone 800 Orthodox parishes were turned into Catholicism. And overall orthodox priests had much less influence and benefits than catholic. One of the reasons why cossacks rose up was unfair treatment for orthodox people.

@strahinjastevic7480

3 жыл бұрын

@@mixererunio1757 how about you stop discussing something you know nothing about

@user-gy8xm4ct5v

3 жыл бұрын

I studied at school that Lithvanian goverment was very good for ruthenian. They come to Ukraine and Belarus, stop tatars excpantion, become ortodox, start to speak rithenian, but after creating commonwealth polish banned ortodox and ruthenian language and there were a lot cossacs revolutions before Khmelnitskiy, but Khmelnitskiy was the luckiest from all there and create Hetmanate, wich was exists from 1648 to 1760 - 1770. And it was many revolutions after Khmelnitskiy when Poland destroy a west half of hetmanate. Last revolution was in 1768 called koliivshina (if I right tranloterated). Sorry for my bad english.

Do the 1964 military coup in Brazil

But why Warmia (the polish region near east Prussia) Isn't polish on the map?

Jabzy You sound kind of different.

There was no 'russia' at that time. It called moscovia

@dwarow2508

Жыл бұрын

It was called Tsardom of Russia buddy

@nxghtghoul4311

5 ай бұрын

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsardom_of_Russia

Where is Jabzy?

To everyone who is interested in the history in those times, there is a polish movie called "With Fire and Sword" Ogniem i mieczem. Recommend it!

Where's the previous narrator?

@JabzyJoe

3 жыл бұрын

I'm still here, just did a wee collab.

What about what he did to the Jews? You just glossed over that!

@nkinash321

2 ай бұрын

Jews picked a side it's easy as that. The exact same thing they did during the rebellions of Gonta and Zalizniak. When there's people fighting for being oppressed and mistreated and jews pick a side of those who were mistreating (including fighting against them). Can't claim innocence after that. They were simply part of the fighting and many of them died, just like many polish and many Ukrainians

I fucking love Jabzy

I think the moral is never ally with the Tatars

@chadgaston8615

2 жыл бұрын

Erdogan has not backstabbed them yet. TB2 helped a lot.

You're like history matters except you cover other history and your art is, and I say this in the best possible way as I love these videos, worse.

civil unrest in Ukraine? glad that's a thing of the past...

@Baltasarmk

3 жыл бұрын

Russia, Poland or Turks treat Ukrainian land as a free real estate? Glad that's things of the past... oh shi~

@twoneedy

Жыл бұрын

@@Baltasarmk Ukrainian land is free real estate, simple truth. Ukraine means marches or border region. Why would a name like that ever fuel some kind claim by ethnicity when your name literally just means a place.

So basically the Cossacks were punished for raiding during a peace treaty and then they decided to freak out and kill all the Poles and Jews. A very positive start to your history. It’s sure nice the catalyst if event of Ukraine invokes such massacres

@nkinash321

2 ай бұрын

Nooo not really. Cosaacks raided tatars and tatars would raid ukraine as well it wasn't one sides. Hmelnitskyi property situation was the last straw after consistent belittling and degradation of ukrainians by the poles. And the jews as always aren't as innocent as people want them to seem. During the rebellion they did not stay neutral and they picked a side as a result they were killed along side the polish. When u hear that after these battles ukrainian land became an equal part of poland and lithuania...so what were they before...that's right subject's and they were treated as such. Ukrainians are not a nation to be consistently belittled and abused they have a point where they rebel always...Ukrainians are freedom loving people. They will not rebel if they're treated with respect. You have to also understand that Ukrainians were not all cossacks. Cosaacks were Ukrainians and other nationalities that were the only way ukrainian people were defended. And pure ukrainian farmers suffered so much under poland and were constantly mistreated. Even in the 20th century I've heard stories of a 90 year old ukrainian who told me how polish would go into a village and just pick a house, undress all the males and then beat then near death while their wives had to watch. And then the polish wonder why ukrainian rebels ended up killing so many of them...history is very intertwined and 3 minutes gives you 0 context on the subject of why people behave the way they do.

is Jabzy, Suibhne?

@JabzyJoe

2 жыл бұрын

I wish

Thank you very much. Every mapper who telling about ukrainian history usualy forgots to tell about cossacs sich and hetmanate, that was exists about 200 year or more. And people, who watching video without cossacs thing, that Ukraine doesnt have history.

Skrzetuski płakał jak ratował

Bogdan Mikhailovich Khmielnitski mobilized few hundred thousand Cossacks for 1648-1657 years. In 1654 he and Tsar were having nearly half of million warriors

@alekshukhevych2644

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, until Russia betrayed Ukraine as they always do.

@dwarow2508

Жыл бұрын

@@alekshukhevych2644 *liberated Ukraine from Polish occupation as they always do.

@alekshukhevych2644

Жыл бұрын

@@dwarow2508 Russian takeover is liberation? Don't you even sound stupid to yourself considering even recent events?

@laderchik888

10 ай бұрын

​@@dwarow2508в якому місці?

@dwarow2508

10 ай бұрын

@@laderchik888 Від Дніпра вся східна Україна

Pronunciation, man! Too many names are hard to understand because you mispronounced them.

The Ukrainian Hitler...

LOL video suggested is "removed".

@luxembourgishempire2826

3 жыл бұрын

No it isn't. Did you not check his latest video on his channel?

Slava Ukraina!!!!

@ssglbc1875

Жыл бұрын

Massive ammo depot was destroyed there today

By Fire and Sword.

@alexabood2516

Жыл бұрын

You’ll get it

First

@luxembourgishempire2826

3 жыл бұрын

Make a normal good comment next.

Szybko

Uprising in lands Kyevska Rus ))hhahaahah

this is clearly not 3 minutes jabzy! learn to count!

Bozhe Tsaria Khrani!!

@adamkasztankiewicz8835

3 жыл бұрын

Death to Tyrants ;) Tzars were terrible tyrants

@pavlotretiakov2130

3 жыл бұрын

No.

@ivanchemnonadnovbogdan-bel7712

3 жыл бұрын

drafts communes!

@konrad1king329

Жыл бұрын

Хмельницький не претендував на титул царя

@konrad1king329

Жыл бұрын

Максимум на князя Руського.

Slava hetman khamelnytsky, Slava ukraini, slava cossack hetmanate

@cossackbrotherhood5772

Жыл бұрын

@[OZN] Polak no!!

@cossackbrotherhood5772

Жыл бұрын

@[OZN] Polak but i still respect you