🚩 Khmelnytsky Uprising was a brutal war that lasted nearly a decade (1648 to 1657). Cossack warriors, under Bohdan Khmelnytsky rose against the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, eventually winning their independence. However, this victory gradually led to the incorporation of what is today eastern Ukraine into Russia, as Cossacks swore allegiance to the Tsar in exchange for greater autonomy than they enjoyed under Polish-Lithuanian rule. Ultimately, the war led to the period known as "The Ruin". The Battle of Zhovti Vody was the first major battle of the Khmelnytsky Uprising.

@danielsantiagourtado3430

5 ай бұрын

Love these facts and videos! You're amazing man 😊😊😊🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

@death-istic9586

5 ай бұрын

Love your videos!💚

@arturwiktor699

5 ай бұрын

Khmelnytsky and the Cossacks never fought for Ukraine. They fought for their rights as another state in the Republic of Poland. Khmelnytsky was not a Cossack but a Polish nobleman.

@greyd.99xsome

5 ай бұрын

@@arturwiktor699 No, they fought to be free from Poland. But yes, his father was polish and his mother was a Cossack woman. His heritage was mixed. And his motives have been somewhat... selfish. He was in a feud with another nobleman who wanted his land and burned his crops. As he received no support from the authorities, he grew discontent and started a uprising with longlasting consequences. Poland-Lithuania never truly recovered from this uprising and Ukraine eventually became russian.

@IWasBornAFreeGreek

5 ай бұрын

hay man / don't start propaganda here either / ukraine was not, is not and will not be a country / even now it is a shame / and a shame to keep lying about what happened in this area and what has been happening since 2014 /

Hetman is not just Lithuanian name for commander. Apart from Poles us Czechs used it too as Hejtman, like Jan Žižka in 1420. It is in fact, probably derrived from German language: Hauptmann. For the guy in charge.

@titanscerw

5 ай бұрын

Yes Hauptman is Captain a man in charge of Company at least (roughly 100 men). Natural size of unit under direct command.

@Phobos1483

2 ай бұрын

literally translated: Head man

@bartoszszczepaniak169

Ай бұрын

Yeah, but the word still just meant a military commander.

Stefan Potock's advisor & military commander, Stefan Czarniecki, was also taken prisoner by the Tatars after the battle, but he escaped after that. Stefan Czarniecki is regarded as a national hero by the Kingdom of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth during the war with the Tatars and today, the Polish national anthem mentions his name due to his military efforts during the Swedish Deluge to prevent the invasion of Poland in 1655 using guerrilla warfare. He's regarded as one of Poland's greatest military commanders.

@ComboMuster

5 ай бұрын

Yes and he also was portrayed in the great epic Potop by Sienkiewicz.

1.Battle of Trembowla 2. Battle of Chocim Please consider these battles, I would like to see them on your channel, it would be amazing on behalf of Poland and Poles!

@HistoryMarche

5 ай бұрын

Thanks so much for the support! Very kind of you.

@anktus5292

5 ай бұрын

polska górą

@ComboMuster

5 ай бұрын

@@anktus5292 now at the bottom.

@anktus5292

5 ай бұрын

@@ComboMuster ?

@karolinaolin8942

5 ай бұрын

@@anktus5292 chodzi mu o to, że w omawianej bitwie Polacy dostali wpierdol, że głowa mała

To be honest, I have always been an opponent of Bohdan Khmelnyky’s personality. I understand that in Ukraine he is considered a figure of national scale, the great founder of the first more or less modern Ukrainian state (and not a fickle principality that broke away from Kiev), but I always viewed Khmelnytsky as an imperious and brutally opportunist who turned his personal vendetta and revenge into the pursuit of power. He never wanted or thought about the Ukrainian people, instead cleverly using the discontent of the peasants and Cossacks to create a state with himself at the head. And when the Poles almost crushed the Cossack state, then in a desperate attempt to save himself, Khmelnitsky threw himself at the feet of the Moscow Tsar, completely destroying any attempts to create an independent Cossack Ukrainian state.

@Milk-rn5uq

5 ай бұрын

I appreciated this, thank you.

@jak00bspyr72

5 ай бұрын

Not only that, but it also made it impossible to establish a lasting Commonwealth of Three Nations, with the Grand Duchy of Ruthenia as a third and equal part of the Commonwealth, besides the Crown of Poland and Grand Duchy of Lithuania.

@kiriankador782

5 ай бұрын

You just have a warped perception of what the world was like before nationalism. You can’t expect Garibaldi behavior from 17th century warlord

@yanposanable

5 ай бұрын

​@@kiriankador782exactly!

@balabanasireti

5 ай бұрын

​@@kiriankador782Nah

History: how many names of people/places in Eastern Europe can you butcher? HistoryMarche: YES

@HistoryMarche

5 ай бұрын

Not gonna lie, that was funny 🤣

@kma3647

5 ай бұрын

I'd rather they make a reasonable effort and butcher them with English phonetics than use an AI voiceover. These guys really do a phenomenal job, and they're one of only a few with any interest in central and eastern Europe of this period. If I want high-quality, exceptionally-researched, brilliantly-animated content (and I do), I'm willing to accept a few name butcherings. In their defense, the Polish spellings are damn near unpronounceable anyway. It's almost as bad as French... or Welsh!

@heofonfyr6000

5 ай бұрын

Despite this narrator being English, he butchers the hell out of English names too. It's a phenomenon.

@copudesado

5 ай бұрын

Frenchmen: "First time?"

@MordimersChessChannel

5 ай бұрын

I found 2 correct ones! Potocki and Sapieha :D

Poles always suprised me, just how good they are considering being almost always outnumbered, even after being betrayed by their own cossacks infantry, they stood. Only after violating the treaty they were killed. What a cowardly move from Khmelnytsky

@KIVagant

5 ай бұрын

However, you should understand that on these lands, Polish representatives for years treated local people like cheap dirt. The amount of hate towards them was as high as it can be. And many cossacs shared the feeling. I'm not saying that breaking a treaty is good, but Cossacks were not a real army, but rebellions. There was nobody to judge their actions no government behind them, so Poland's army made a big mistake in the first place even to negotiate.

@MegaHappydead

5 ай бұрын

Regiment Cossacks arrived later. This's a perspective written by a polish chronicler : ) i don't deny, Commonwealth was the strongest country\ or one of strongest at a time but would be cool to see Cossacks perspective too.

@kosa9662

5 ай бұрын

​@@KIVagantbullshit, on that time it was Rus Magnates who were opressing cossacks and peasants. Duke Jarema Wiśniowiecki had Rurikid origins, he 'owned' by 1648 ~400 000 people. Even today, local Ukrainian oligarchs(magnates back then) are opressing Ukraine as a state and Ukrainians as a people.

@postumus77

5 ай бұрын

Yeah b/c independent Ukraine has done so much better for its people. It couldn't even keep the legacy infrastructure and living standards left to it by the Soviet Union going, and instead sold itself to Black Rock and the chosen tribe. The US asks Ukraine to drop her pants and all she says back is, "which hole?". What a pathetic "country". And stop making excuses for lying and cheating, a man's word doesn't need a government contract behind it, if your word isn't worth anything, you better be powerful enough to impose your will on the entire world b/c no one will trust you, and you will make enemies out of everyone you rip off. @@KIVagant

@arifahmedkhan9999

5 ай бұрын

​@@kosa9662 He was with the poles was he not? Ethnicity is not the concern. The kingdom is

Its amazing that Cossaks and tatars needed such huge numerical advantage, deceit, betrayal and oath breaking to defeat that army.

@terro3842

5 ай бұрын

There's a notable role of Ivan Barabas - Cherkassy colonel loyal to the Polish king, he was a Cossack commander loyal to the king, during the rebellion of other Cossacks during this battle, even though he was an old man in his 60's, he rose from his seat on one of the support ships going down the river and started fighting alongside his personal retinue. Despite all his men were slaughtered within first 10 minutes, he was so greatly revered by the traitors due to the tales of his past exploits against the Turks nobody would dare approach him and he killed two that did make initial challenge. Unfortunately he slipped in a puddle of blood on the deck of the ship and once down he was pierced by numerous men. Another notable figure was captain Werner of the German mercenary infantry. Cossacks tried bribing him and promised him mountains of gold for switching sides, but he just said that despite Polish Crown was late with payments and their doom was certain if they refused his contract stipulates they are hired until June that year - an ordered his men to fire at the Tatars and Cossacks during the negotiations. Supposedly the German brigade were the last men standing south of the river from the entirety of Polish Commonwealth's army.

@MegaHappydead

5 ай бұрын

It's Polish perspective

@hooywamd00pe95

5 ай бұрын

@@MegaHappydead Based on what? He didnt mention whos account he used, and as far as i know they look at different accounts.

@MegaHappydead

5 ай бұрын

@@hooywamd00pe95 there is no different accounts O .o This is Polish perspective - check wikipedia... Written by polish chronicler.. Also, he made a couple of mistakes

@hooywamd00pe95

5 ай бұрын

@@MegaHappydead lol wikipedia...really? You have no proof they only used the joke that is wikipedia, you assume things for some reason, probably because of some bias.

Thanks for a great video! ⚔🔥✊

Ruthenians to Poles: "Give us your weapons, and we'll have peace. We definitely won't betray you and immediately attack afterwards!" Doesn't this sound kinda... familiar?

@tktilk3878

5 ай бұрын

But if you watch the history of rebellions before Khmelnitsky's, there were times when Poles executed negotiators and did similar things, cause Cossacks were considered a some kind of terrorists by the Poles, so it's merely same thing as Polish-Lithuanian nobles did. And don't forget that many of these nobles who fought at Polish-Lithuanian side had a Ruthenian roots, like Wishnevetskiy or Ostrozhskiy, so it was kinda civil war between two sides of Ruthenians and Poles and Lithuanians

@tktilk3878

3 ай бұрын

@@user-lt7nc7lc2d that's true

@rustamkyrychenko6371

2 ай бұрын

​@@user-lt7nc7lc2d nonthense, as if you try to look in documents of that time - a lot of mentions Rusyns( Ruthenians are latinised version of it) there, at that territories To say more - Ruthenian Voivodeship (Województwo ruskie) didn't include Transkarpatia in it, but included nowadays Halychyna and part of Volyn Rusyn(Ruthenian) is ethnonym of people that lived on territories that is Ukraine now, language/culture/religion were common things and these that unified all these people. And language and Religion were known as Rusyn(Rus'ka to be correct) Why Transkarpatians are keep that ethnonym until today - because of Hungarians/Chech who called them so until middle of 20th century While russians and Polish abandoned that name from 18th century and started to call people/language Ukrainian

@ChateaudeLoire1110

2 ай бұрын

Da Romans

There were no lakes on the Dnipr back then I think. The corresponding dams hadn´t been built yet.

@rustamkyrychenko6371

2 ай бұрын

The same thing bothers me on every single history video :)

Thanks for posting this vid

Informative AND entertaining documentary.

@bdleo300

5 ай бұрын

AND blatantly propagandist....

EXCELLENT AS ALWAYS

@HistoryMarche

5 ай бұрын

Thank you! Cheers!

Never heard about Ukrainian state at that time. Where did you get such information.

@real-history-online

5 ай бұрын

Ukrainian revisionist propaganda 😂😂😂

@lyanoka362

5 ай бұрын

It exist only in the Soviet union but only a part of it. Ukran state founded in 24 of august. 1991. Fact.

@SU-vy8nb

Ай бұрын

i think this happened shortly before the Ukrainians dug out the black sea by hand to have access to the oceans.

@kebabitas

Ай бұрын

Do you know at this time there was no Russia either? There was Moscow duchy.

@user-jo6ke9hw1x

Ай бұрын

@@kebabitas there were no French Republic, Great Britain and etc. as well.

And thank you very much for this:)

Comment for the algorithm great channel thank you.

Historymarche never dissapoints us

@bdleo300

5 ай бұрын

But they did disappoint with this propaganda bs, no 'ukraine' existed in 17th century.... and no, I'm not Russian but this is a blatant revisionism: 'a victory that doomed ukraine'. Same propaganda $ht as Kings and Generals and 99% of Murican Mickey Mouse channels.

@IWasBornAFreeGreek

5 ай бұрын

i am /

"Colonel Crook-nose" is a literally translation of colonel`s family name Kryvonis. Please, make a note about that )

Interesting video. Nice work!

Great video

Love your content man! You're the best at what You do 😊😊😊❤❤❤❤

@HistoryMarche

5 ай бұрын

Thank you so much 😀

@danielsantiagourtado3430

5 ай бұрын

@@HistoryMarche Always Huge fan

Another great video HM! as always!

LOVE your videos!! BY FAR the best of your "kind", puts K&G *to shame* !!!!!!

Thanks

Please make series about Khmelnytsky Uprising (for instance Defense of Zbaraż or battle of Berestreczko)

@michealohaodha9351

5 ай бұрын

Ogniem i mieczem ;)

As always, thank you for the great content.

Love your videos! Consider doing video about Žalgirio mūšis.

This video does not state clearly that the rebellion of Cossacks happened separately from the main field of battle that's why there's a confusion about the numbers. The rebellion in which Ivan Barabas was killed and his second in command took Cossack forces to Chmielnitsky happened some 20/30 kilometers from Potocki's and Polish encampment before they managed to join forces. Indeed the total forces on the Polish side were in the end: - 150 Polish nobles, organized into hussar shock cavalry constituting Potocki's personal retinue and elite - 550 Cossack light riders from private household regiments of Polish aristocrats (they stayed loyal) - 550 Polish and Ruthenian dragoons - 1500 registered Cossacks under 3 Polish officers (they betrayed almost to a man) So in the end I think Polish side couldn't have had more than 1250-1300 fighters that were loyal throughout entire engagement. Source: The composition of Polish forces at Yellow Waters and near Korsun in 1648, "Przegląd Historyczno-Wojskowy", 16 (67)/2 (252), 2015, pp. 39-62

Very nice! Leserknown history, thanks1 Hope to see battle of Korsun next time!

The shilling here is insane. No such thing as ukraine back then lol

@jahinsadman1505

5 ай бұрын

facts dont matter, condemn hummus and ruzzia

@owoc8260

5 ай бұрын

what are you talking about? There was no Ukrainian nationality but ukraine existed, unless you think that the eastern part of Poland did not exist

@sss1029

5 ай бұрын

@@owoc8260 it was eastern poland, not ukraine

@owoc8260

5 ай бұрын

@@sss1029 So I understand that the act of incorporation of Volhynia, the Halych land of Ukraine by Poland from Lithuania in 1569 did not exist. At that time, the word Ukraine was already used in Polish, interchangeably with "Kyivishzna" or Kijowszyzna

@sss1029

5 ай бұрын

@@owoc8260 youre disproving yourself in your own comments. Incorporating some disjointed peasant borderlands into poland ≠ existence of ukraine as a country

not sure how long ago you fixed the knife in dead generals being skewed during animation, but glad to see it!

Love this era and especially Eastern theater related history. Keep it coming!!!

It was not a simple "uprising" as the historiography of tsarist and communist Russia would described it, or the nationalist Ukrainian historiography that today copies those Russian theses. Khmelnytsky started a rebellion. This rebellion had the features of a civil war within the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.

Great

How come you made such awesome video, but did map wrong? In XVII century there were no dams on Dnieper, and hence, there were no reservoirs that you displayed :)

@invictus2336

5 ай бұрын

Yeah that struck me as odd. I'm like this can't be right.

@pancakes429

5 ай бұрын

Everything is wrong with this video it's pushing Polish propaganda.

@davidryan7613

5 ай бұрын

The names are the least concerning aspect considering it's a video about a country that didn't even exist. Political bullshit, why can't they just do history.

@gyoyyk1

5 ай бұрын

Yeah, that map is garbage. They've also put Yelisavetgrad there, which was obviously founded later, during the Russian Empire period. I mean, the town is named after a Russian empress (Yelisaveta/Elizabeth), how could a person who is supposed to know the history of the region put it there.

@AaSs-ln9mm

3 ай бұрын

Dude, Russia and USSR build nothing, it was made by anciet Ukrainians Jesus Christenko and Abraham Lincolnenko.😂

Great job ! Btw Polish ( or more accurately Russ ) magnat name was Jeremi Wiśniowiecki - you can spell it something like Vishniovecky :)

@HistoryMarche

5 ай бұрын

Holy cow that name lol. My narrator had such a hard time with Polish names haha

@ComboMuster

5 ай бұрын

@@HistoryMarche easier and more correctly as Vish-neo-vets-ky it is not hard just a bit to get used to 🙂

@Kwerd

5 ай бұрын

Він був українським шляхтичем

@jedrzejlehman3987

5 ай бұрын

Yes, indeed 😃

@kosa9662

5 ай бұрын

He wasnt Polish, he was catholic Rus, his family traced their lineage back from Rurikids.

this is a sacrifice for the algorithm

dziękuję

❤❤❤❤❤

Brilliant! One thing though - back then the correct name was Tsardom of Moscowy, not russia, the latter appeared only around early 18th century

In the "Khmelnytskyi" name, the "Kh" sound is softer; there's no "K" in it. English "H" is, basically, a breath out. The slavik sound is made by pressing the tongue closer to the palate, but it's still soft. That's why the transliteration for the letter/sound is "Kh". There's simply no letter in the English alphabet that would fit the sound perfectly. As for Chyhyryn, well, I don't even know how to explain the pronunciation using English letters. But I like how you try to be accurate with all these international names. Kudos for that! Another update: Zhovti Vody means Yellow Waters, and Zhovti River means "Yellow River".

@pisuoxide

3 ай бұрын

no one cares

Please can you do the Battle of Berestechko?

Your animations and music add so much to these videos. Very engaging, thank you!

@HistoryMarche

5 ай бұрын

Thank you very much!

Well they didn't surrender to Russia but joined on their free will

@jak00bspyr72

5 ай бұрын

Not all of the Cossacs supported bending the knee to Russian Tsar.

@uberneanderthal

5 ай бұрын

almost like they want to be Russian 🤔

@Markomilic205

5 ай бұрын

@@uberneanderthal Well in that time religion came first and then nationality. Given that today Ukrainian and Russian language are similar, back then i presume that the language barrier was even slimmer.

@History-fq6dp

5 ай бұрын

Better study history))) after Khmelnytskyi, his successor was Ivan Vyhovskyi who defeated the Muscovites near Konotop. Then Ivan Mazepa tried together with the Swedish king to defeat the army of Peter 1 near Poltava. Ukraine-Rus was trapped by the enemies of the Ottomans, Poland, and Muscovites.

@History-fq6dp

5 ай бұрын

@@jak00bspyr72 the Pereyasli Rada was an alliance from Russia with the Muscovites. But as you know, the Muscovites are a very treacherous people, they took advantage of this alliance for their own benefit, this did not happen to the Rusyn Cossacks, and they crushed their army under the sword.

The Cossacks and Tatars made a good team.

@JDDC-tq7qm

4 ай бұрын

Most Tatars are modem day Russians 🇷🇺😎

Lol. I remembered the Chinese would say thus about the Xiongnu 2000 years ago: "The nomads are not bound by honoring the trust, and are prone to break pacts."

@TheWeedmonkey123

5 ай бұрын

Just like the Chinese broke numerous pacts with the nomads. People in general are like that

@KhalDrogo493

5 ай бұрын

Orkhon inscriptions literally calls Chinese liars and deceits from the 7th century.

@rustamkyrychenko6371

2 ай бұрын

Quite common thing in that time :) And in addition - quite common among rebels

One more unto the algorithm dear friends once more

It is nice that you made a video about the history of Ukraine, but the video is not entirely true, namely: 1. it is not indicated that Pototsky additionally asked registered Cossacks to swear allegiance, since they formed the basis of the corps that descended the Dnieper under the leadership of Barabash and Krychevskyi. 2. The corps of Krychevsky and Barabash, due to the difficulty of Veliky Lug (your map is not reliable at the time, there was no Kakhovsky reservoir at that time) moved to a distance of 100 km from the son of Pototsky, and over time they arrived near Sich, where they were approached by Khmelnytskyi's negotiators, who convinced them to join . Khmelnytskyi's supporters cut down the dragoons and Cossacks loyal to the crown and went to the aid of Bohdan, who then demonstratively marched in front of the Polish camp, which greatly weakened the morale of Pototskyi's troops. For some reason, you have the 2nd corps with all the troops in the camp; 2. it is not indicated that the Ukrainians and Tatars carried out false attacks in order to tire Pototsky's army (Tatars during the day, Cossacks at night); 3. it is not indicated that Mykolai Pototsky could have been in time to help his son, but he was disoriented by the number of Tatars, so he hesitated and did not make it; 4. the thesis that "Cossacks and Tatars planned fraudulent negotiations..." the Poles wanted to leave the place due to a lack of provisions and went to negotiate with the Ukrainians, according to which the Poles gave guns and flags, where one of the conditions was the exchange of hostages, to strengthen the agreement, is not true . However, Pototsky had to negotiate separately with the Tatars, who could not come to an agreement and the agreement broke down, Khmelnytskyi did not deceive anyone, moreover, he could not imprison the hostages, who were the cementing factor of the agreement; 5. it is not indicated about the Cossack outpost, which prevented the path of Pototsky's army (during the movement of Pototsky's army, the Tatars conducted shelling and small attacks on the flanks), as a result of which the Tatars surrounded the army and defeated it.

@naper8845

3 ай бұрын

Це пізда ми пройобуємо інформаційну війну усім нашим історичним ворогам і тому вестерни пишуть повну хуйню в коментарях як завжди

Love your videos. They are a great way of encouraging wider audience to study the subject on their own. Also ignore people whining about pronouncing names correctly. I for example take unhealthy amount of pride in that my language can be considered a torture method😊

Pretty good pronunciation of Polish names and surnames. Respect

Great work as always! Thanks you HistoryMarche! Much respect

This video send me shivers down my spine. This is one of my favourite subjects of European history. Knowing how Khmelnitsky revolt started enlightened me even more on the subject. I fell in love with it through Sienkiewich. I have read The trilogy and they are one of the greatest books I have read. Figures like prince Wiesniowicki, Szkretuski, Wolodyjowski, Podbipieta, Bohun, Hmelnytski, Tuhai Bei and above anyone else pan Zagloba have strenghtened me, gave courage to me and helped me in a way. I remember from Through fire and sword the siege of Zbaraz...Some time passed since I've read it, but I still feel goosebumps remembering that magnificent piece of literature. Oh, the might and wisdom of Jarema Wisniowicki, the military prowess and courage of Szkreruski, the perfection in sword wielding: Wolodyjowski, the sheer power and warmness in the same time of Podbipieda, the menace and incredible power of the Hatman of the Cossacks, the military prowess and menace of Tuhai Bei and Bohun and the incredible wisdom and wit of this new Uysses, Zagloba. History Marche, thanks for covering this. Sienkiewich made these wars immortal. You guys bring it to us from a historical, accurate point of view so this is good.

Was ukrain name used in year 1600?

Can you pls do some polynesian wars? Battle of gate pa?

why does the voice cut in and out so much? are these pre recorded voice bits just edited together? or an AI voice program?

The best history channel in the world

There is a good polish book and movie based on the book about this war, called "with fire and sword", or "Ogniem i Mieczem". Also a Mount and blade game as well.

Please make now Battle of Berestechko, great polish victory against the cossacks what was not used well bc of King and nobility

Sweden: "I'm gonna do what's called a pro gamer move."

Ukraine didnt exist then

@High_rise12

5 ай бұрын

🤦🤦🤦🤦

Historical face palm

More PLC history :)

Bro, the image of the video didn’t load at first. My heart skipped a beat when I read the title XD

Any similarty with current events is not pure coincidence. Its what happens when people dont learn history.

@greyd.99xsome

5 ай бұрын

Yes, until the Tatars betrayed the Cossacks😏

On the map you showing Nikolaev city, but it was founded in 1789.

@cetus4449

4 ай бұрын

Not only this is shown incorrectly. Note that the course of the Dnieper River also looked different. They show what the Dnieper looks like today, with dams built on the river not in the times of Khmelnytsky of course, but in the times of the USSR. The stylized maps are apparently based on today's terrain. That is why, for example, in the material about the Battle of Kircholm, is showed the dam on the Dvina River, which was built in the 20th century. History Marche is channel that popularizes history. It's content is not created by experts, historians, archaeologists or researchers, but by some history buffs. They often make mistakes or oversimplify what they talk about, but that doesn't stop me from watching their materials with interest. You just need to be aware that to acquire historical knowledge you reach for books, museums, etc. not on KZread. This is still just entertainment, not real knowledge.

Love the channel. However if you want to support HM, just directly do so. There's a few videos breaking down the quality of the knives advertised.

Please make video on Roman vs Hannibal.

@High_rise12

5 ай бұрын

He goes into great length covering the second Punic war

A good film.

@HistoryMarche

5 ай бұрын

Hey Legalna, great to see you

'Chyhyryn' should be correctly pronounced as [tʃihirin] not [hyhyryn]

The Polish nobles were probably fighting amongst themselves about prioritizing farm upgrades, especially heavy plow, and not putting any farms next to TC, but only around folwarks

Mel Gibson would call Ruthenia Ukraine as well

I'd just mention for the context. In Polish forces at that time the term "Cossack" reffered to any type of light cavalry, so not necessary cossacks from Ukraine/Russia

When Ukraine and Poland fight each other Russia wins, when they work together Russia lose, that's why we need them to work togheter.

@cetus4449

4 ай бұрын

Tell that to the Ukrainians... maybe they will finally understand.

Very informative!!!€

Thanks! I know it was hard to spell correct names of regions, cities and participants of this war, but you did pretty good! Thanks for your work!

Violated the treaty by taking their cannons and not provided a safe passage. Cowards, that's what they are.

@Mastakilla91

5 ай бұрын

Correct, but so did the Commonwealth by taking his land.

@arandomwalk

5 ай бұрын

@lemonacidrounds7293 Couldn’t agree more

@user-mc8ow8me9o

5 ай бұрын

​@@Mastakilla91xDDDDD

@Saeronor

5 ай бұрын

@@Mastakilla91 "Commonwealth" took "his land" where? Apparently, his family thought they could hold their private possessions by the power of smekalka alone, never formalizing their ownership. Which was then inevitably contested by a bigger fish who knew how to (mis)use lawyers. "Commonwealth" had never taken "his land", as this entire region _was_ Commonwealth, by, funny enough, democratic decision of _Ruthenian_ nobility in 1569.

@balazsszieberth9736

5 ай бұрын

True

great

👍👍👍

Amazing video! I always enjoy listening to the pronunciation of Polish names by narrators from abroad hahaha. Really hope for a whole series about the uprising and the following Russo-Polish War

Ukraine was never a country. This channel really fell off

@Kwerd

5 ай бұрын

Khmelnytskyi, who said that: "Mother Ukraine gave birth to us", and also: "Remember the exploits of the previous Ukrainian (Rus') soldiers, and also: "There are branches of the same tree and brave soldiers, son, show courage."

Ukraine? You mean diet Russians?

while overall i did enjoy the video i do take issue with one thing. since the integration of eastern ukraine into the tsardom of russia is hinted at in the title it, as a topic, should probably have a more prominent position in the video itself. having it only referenced in the footnotes at the end feels underwhelming.

never trust your enemy

That thumpnail is so appropiate for the blunder🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

Shame see this chanel the history rewrite too…. No Ukrain state in that time!!!

@Kwerd

5 ай бұрын

Khmelnytskyi, who said that: "Mother Ukraine gave birth to us", and also: "Remember the exploits of the previous Ukrainian (Rus') soldiers, and also: "There are branches of the same tree and brave soldiers, son, show courage."

Now please do video on the battle of Berestechko, another great battle regarding Khmelnytsky Uprising. Cheers!

Factually, Ukraine never existed before 1990

@Kwerd

5 ай бұрын

Khmelnytskyi, who said that: "Mother Ukraine gave birth to us", and also: "Remember the exploits of the previous Ukrainian (Rus') soldiers, and also: "There are branches of the same tree and brave soldiers, son, show courage."

@High_rise12

5 ай бұрын

You talking about facts is f*cking laughable 😂😂😂😂

@Ilost11

5 ай бұрын

Well the Ukrainian state existed in a contested capacity in 1917 as the Ukrainian People's Republic and then more concretely for a brief window after the treaty of Brest-Litvosk in 1918 under Pavlo Skoropadskyi as a nominally independent state, but de-facto German protectorate. Either way, unlike what History Marche seems to be editorializing in, Ukrainian conceptually doesn't exist until very late 19th century and early 20th century romanticism. Khmelnytskyi considered himself an heir to the Kievan Rus once his rebellion materialized into something more than a local rebellion, never once a Ukrainian. As such a thing did not exist, conceptually or practically.

@High_rise12

5 ай бұрын

@@Ilost11 the kyivan rus which is what Ukrainian Belarus and Russia trace their origins back to

@Kwerd

5 ай бұрын

@@Ilost11 Khmelnytskyi, who said that: "Mother Ukraine gave birth to us", and also: "Remember the feats of previous Ukrainian (Rus) soldiers, and also: "There are branches of the same tree and brave soldiers, son, show courage." Also about the UNR: she was such a puppet state that the Germans could not do anything. According to the agreement, they allocated their troops to support the Ukrainian People's Republic against the Russian Republic. That's all. From what they personally did, it was to destroy the short-lived Central Rada, which was ruled by socialists, which destroyed the Ukrainian the army, as they believed in a peaceful solution. They didn't even arrange the arrival of Skoropadsky, as he was elected by the Khliborov congress.

Washing history

1:40 “Hetman” I’m pretty sure is gothic before Lithuanian

I love how you try to say koniecpolski

Where Ukraine? There was no such thing at the time

@Kwerd

5 ай бұрын

Khmelnytskyi, who said that: "Mother Ukraine gave birth to us", and also: "Remember the exploits of the previous Ukrainian (Rus') soldiers, and also: "There are branches of the same tree and brave soldiers, son, show courage."

@randomname-cc9hc

19 күн бұрын

+15 rubles

Outnumbered 11 to 1 and still they stood tall, survived betrayal and mutiny, loosing only due to cowardly move from Khmelnytsky

@Penasta

5 ай бұрын

Still lost.

@Vandelberger

5 ай бұрын

@@PenastaThat is such a non-statement.

@polishgigachad7097

5 ай бұрын

​@@PenastaIn fact, the Ukrainian rabble lost the chance to be part of European civilization.

@kosa9662

5 ай бұрын

​@@polishgigachad7097so true, Poland is so better without those Ukrainian/Rus' corruption and oligarchs.

@pancakes429

5 ай бұрын

@@polishgigachad7097 Yes it marks Polands decline.

Good video

Aren't those knives a scam.

Always with the historically inaccurate plugin of the word “Ukraine”. No one used that word to refer to the people living there until modern history. The correct term would be “the first Ruthenian state”.

@Kwerd

5 ай бұрын

Khmelnytskyi, who said that: "Mother Ukraine gave birth to us", and also: "Remember the exploits of the previous Ukrainian (Rus') soldiers, and also: "There are branches of the same tree and brave soldiers, son, show courage."

There's a notable role of Ivan Barabas - Cherkassy colonel loyal to the Polish king, he was a Cossack commander loyal to the king, during the rebellion of other Cossacks during this battle, even though he was an old man in his 60's, he rose from his seat on one of the support ships going down the river and started fighting alongside his personal retinue. Despite all his men were slaughtered within first 10 minutes, he was so greatly revered by the traitors due to the tales of his past exploits against the Turks nobody would dare approach him and he killed two that did make initial challenge. Unfortunately he slipped in a puddle of blood on the deck of the ship and once down he was pierced by numerous men. Another notable figure was captain Werner of the German mercenary infantry. Cossacks tried bribing him and promised him mountains of gold for switching sides, but he just said that despite Polish Crown was late with payments and their doom was certain if they refused his contract stipulates they are hired until June that year - an ordered his men to fire at the Tatars and Cossacks during the negotiations. Supposedly the German brigade were the last men standing south of the river from the entirety of Polish Commonwealth's army.

@user-jc4oi1xg1z

5 ай бұрын

Cherkasy, NOT "Cherkassy"!

Let's sacrifice the Algorithm!!!

@Kwerd

5 ай бұрын

explain what are you talking about

Have you stoped showing your sources?

I just checked causalities at Wikipedia and it's different from even an army size at your video. Also, it would be fair to mention, this is a Polish perspective P.S: Registered Cossacks arrived later due to Wikipedia (On 4 May 1648, near Kamianyi Zaton, Mykhailo Krychevsky's 1,500 registered Cossacks mutinied, killing all the officers (Krychevsky himself was taken prisoner and would join Khmelnytsky's army).[3]: 404  Cossacks who stayed loyal to the Crown Army, such as Ivan Barabash, were cut down,[3]: 404  as well as the German dragoons in their midst. Rebellious Cossacks arrived at the battlefield on 13 May.)

@michasmarzewski3670

5 ай бұрын

quoting wikipedia and typing Polish by not using capital letter makes your comment 'very' valuable.

@MegaHappydead

5 ай бұрын

@@michasmarzewski3670 I'm sorry, I didn't mean to offend, just didn't pay attention.. I have Polish blood as well, I just don't care much about nationality stuff - all people are the same for me . This video isn't much different from Wikipedia. it's just the author didn't mention a couple of important details as Registered Cossacks arrived to the battle later P.S: Do anyone even hate Polish people? I think everyone love you for your RPG games and help to Ukraine but I personally think people should stop Global Political games and grow up as one unity - United Nation must be reformed