Why are congressman and senators immune from prosecution for the criminal acts of insider trading?

@user-se8ot7hs4o

Ай бұрын

Great question

@trailguy

Ай бұрын

Well, they aren’t, but insider trading is narrowly defined. They need to make it more usefully defined. My sister only answers to the ceo of her company and sold lots of stock recently. …long story but I asked her if she should have published the move ahead of the trade and she said no because she isn’t on the finance team. …I was surprised, and I trade stocks.

@Doty6String

Ай бұрын

Lobbying

@georgewilson4245

Ай бұрын

And what about the corrupted BOUGHT Supreme Justices?

@brandoncrawford5029

Ай бұрын

Because that’s their bread and butter

"A Republic, if you can keep it" - Franklin

@silverhammer7779

Ай бұрын

Looks like we couldn't, in the long run...

Can Nancy p be prosecuted for insider trading.

@DCosgrove82

Ай бұрын

No. Reps and Sens have an exemption.

@cafl9844

Ай бұрын

If you have proof bring it on boy !

@kennethcheesbrough6855

Ай бұрын

No she has already used immunity as a defense.

@MAGaBAMA_84

Ай бұрын

​@cafl9844 Are you fkg kidding me boy!! You don't need proof, just go back to old videos and you have your proof DA!

@stevenhenry5267

Ай бұрын

Hahahahahaha. Whataboutism fail.

"It's not about how hard you hit. It's about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward. How much you can take and keep moving forward" Rocky

The Supreme Court Of The United States has one job , uphold and follow the Constitution.

@Tom-ut6ky

Ай бұрын

Problem is the Left believes they are paid off if their decision disagrees with the democrat/progressive ideology.

@Tom-ut6ky

Ай бұрын

@@fearlessfosdick160 No, they still do it. The problem is you lefties demand SCOTUS follow your ideology instead of the Constitution. You basically hate democracy even with all the BS whining about "saving democracy." Trying to jail your greatest political opponent because you know he's going to beat you in the election isn't American Democracy, but it IS Democrat party politics.

@philipquaglino

Ай бұрын

and 3 of them NEVER vote for the Constitution...well according to those 3, 2A does not exist, so it is political AF sadly. When the Right leaning judges go, 2A will be abolished immediately which could trigger a civil war as the are openly abolishing a right that says "shall not be infringed". the DNC today actually has me see that yes (by design) America will topple itself as it just splits.

@hammerfist8763

Ай бұрын

No. That is the job of the president and congress. The US Supreme Court's job is to interpret it.

@buybuydandavis

Ай бұрын

Too bad they sided with The Coup in Texas v. Pennsylvania. Treason.

Since when is it criminal to challenge ellection results? Apparently it's only criminal for Trump!!!

@RealYRM

Ай бұрын

Right, and let's say that it "was the most honest election in history" ok? Why did the Democrats make it LOOK like a scam? Everyone went to bed with Trump winning by millions, and then all these boxes, 100% of which went to Biden, show up after hours and get counted in swing states in blue areas where they took away Voter ID and Signature Verification, and the voter rolls haven't been updated, and we know Democrats would push an old lady out of a wheelchair to "save Democracy" from Trump? Why would anyone believe in the validity of that election? I don't even think Democrats believe it, they're acting like fans of pro-wrestling heels... "No, Ric Flair didn't use brass knuckles too win! Prove it!"

@LB-bi5lp

Ай бұрын

I remember how everyone called Bush illegitimate in 2000… funny how things change. They’re all hypocrites

@xlr8r2010

Ай бұрын

They need to charge me too....I think the whole f**king government is corrupt and tyrannical, they need to come and arrest me ASAP! FJB🖕

@bestlaidplans4511

Ай бұрын

I'm curious if you believe the Al Gore and Hillary Clinton election result challenges used the same methods as Trump. Because if you can't see how Trump's "challenge" was different, you'll continue to be confused or point at a perceived injustice.

@wesleysim1805

Ай бұрын

When trump did it. It was fine for gore Abram’s and Clinton. But Trump now we got a legal issue

If we can't have justice in the Supreme Court, the country will be lost.

@hymns4ever197

Ай бұрын

The SCOTUS has historically not batted 1000. The hope is that they get most of the major issues right most of the time. When one of it's members can't define what a woman is, I'd say we're pretty close to being lost.

@subjectofgov

Ай бұрын

Justice for Trump? Justice for Joe Biden? What kind of justice are you wanting?

@garywarren6285

Ай бұрын

@@subjectofgov Blind, impartial, equal. You know. Everything required by the Constitution but being denied to any opponent of this corrupt government.

@zaurakdigis

Ай бұрын

@@subjectofgovdue process before a jury, not delay being enabled by SCOTUS, obstruction of justice.

@SB-mw1bg

Ай бұрын

@@subjectofgov Fair and impartial justice. Something that we are currently not seeing in some state run governments.

Challenging an election can be "private" &/or "official". Any CITIZEN must be able to say, "HERE is something that compromises this election; this issue MUST be addressed to ensure the result is valid." But, an individual, who is also a government office holder, HAS, in my view, A DUTY to SPEAK UP if something compromises the outcome.

@DustinNelson-lf2wt

Ай бұрын

Oh and it’s literally politicians job to compromise!!

@youngmarl9351

Ай бұрын

Yes, that falls under free speech. You can say an election was rigged. But you can't send fake electors with forged certificates to reverse a legal election. That is not legal. Make sense?

@youngmarl9351

Ай бұрын

As long as you don’t try to overturn the election with illegal activities then you can cry “unfair” all you want

@chrisbraswell8864

Ай бұрын

They had a council years ago that looked into the ways you could game the system and Mail in Ballots was at the top of the list. Jimmy Carter was on this Council. Every thing Bad is what the Democrats want.

@nturavrgchick6055

Ай бұрын

💯💯💯

He has a right to demand a recount, everyone does

@xhpy6760

Ай бұрын

THAT’S NOT ALL HE DID.

@LaurenStone-bc5wr

Ай бұрын

They're counted numerous times! Biden won. Teump lies stolen election evidence? Ever see any?

@Rathkryn

Ай бұрын

@@xhpy6760 THAT'S NOT ALL THE DEMOCRATS DID IN 2000 AND IN 2016.

@gm-zz8so

Ай бұрын

Your right he has a right to contest any part of an election. this is manufactured out of a kangaroo court and DOJ ..that waited 4 years for this "opportunity"

@Mezziah11.11

Ай бұрын

@@xhpy6760 all in his right, Do you know how many presidents or running for president,have called for a certified result, especially when there has now been proven in court that many of the ballots were fraudulent. Why do you think Trump has more support now than ever before, the world sees he should be the real president and Bidens a hack, placed in by illegitimate votes and corrupted officials

The question is whether a President collecting payments from Private companies through family members is a act that can be prosecuted.

Justice Roberts is right , what kind of a defence is " we should prosecute because we can prosecute" , Roberts is basically highlighting every prosecution taking place against Trump at the moment

@emilyalice1

Ай бұрын

Roberts is a joke and your lack of education is embarrassing.

@eugeneharris6898

Ай бұрын

​@@emilyalice1by your logic the could all be referred to as a joke.

@jeffreyloftus3617

Ай бұрын

@@emilyalice1 The fact that you think the "chief justice" is a joke speaks volumes for your education.

@emilyalice1

Ай бұрын

@@jeffreyloftus3617 The fact that you are incapable of analyzing Judicial precedent, reading the Constitution and conflict your politics with law proves you are a child.

@bolarinwaosilesi1352

Ай бұрын

@@jeffreyloftus3617 Because he is chief justice don't mean he is wise, he is as dumb as they come and a Trump cult member. All the prosecution against Trump was because of his own stupid action.

One of my all time favourite statements, actually said in the Supreme Court, “trust me, I’m from the Government and I’m here to help you “. I’m laughing all night. 😂

@jamesstevens1994

Ай бұрын

That's from a Reagan speech. When was it said to he supreme court?

@gbonkers666

Ай бұрын

That was Ronald Reagan

@michaelshapiro1543

Ай бұрын

When was this said in the supreme court, by whom & in what context? They keep written records, I hear. I'd be glad to look it up if you give proper info/citation. Thanks.

@chriskelly1890

Ай бұрын

Well, there's social security, medicare, police, the military, roads, airports, the FDA, etc etc

@joelwillis2043

Ай бұрын

Exactly, that is why I never trusted Trump when he was in office.

"Trust us, we'd never make this political"

@nturavrgchick6055

Ай бұрын

Right?? That has got to be the most absurd sentence ever muttered by a human in all of human history!

Why is questioning the results of an election a problem to begin with? WHAT THE FUK?

@michaelshapiro1543

Ай бұрын

'Zackly! As if no other election, U.S. or elsewhere, has EVER been contested. 😃

@ChemistyStudent

Ай бұрын

It's not. Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969)

@chriskelly1890

Ай бұрын

Questioning is no problem. Plotting to overthrow the government is another thing, and is illegal, otherwise it would happen all the time.

@mrradman2986

Ай бұрын

@@chriskelly1890 Trump was still POTUS on 6th January. The fact the Far Left came up with the concept of 'election denier' shows you are wrong in any case. Enough shenanigans were already obvious at the time meant it was absolutely in order and in fact mandatory for the POTUS to question what had happened. He has of course been vindicated by subsequent events with more than half of Americans now agreeing the 2020 election which installed Biden was 'problematic'.

@1969WasYesterday

Ай бұрын

Read the indictment. He did a lot more than ask questions. There’s a reason Fox does not discuss the details. Ever.

The president shouldn’t have to consult a lawyer before doing something. It’s an absurd notion.

@daviddadamo2290

Ай бұрын

The President has a cabinet officer called “The Attorney General.”

@chriskelly1890

Ай бұрын

Presidents don't have to, and 99.9% of the time do not.

@zengjanezhu

Ай бұрын

​@@daviddadamo2290 so, what is the point? President likely hires person who will be loyal to him, plus some laws are not clear cut. Just like VP's role in 2020 election. Different lawyers had different interpretations.

@daviddadamo2290

Ай бұрын

@@zengjanezhu I disagree completely. Bill Barr advised Trump he lost a free and fair election. Mike Pence sought legal advice from Michael Luttig who told him he had no constitutional power to reject the electors. When your chosen partisan lawyer even tells you it’s illegal, it’s pretty clear you can’t do it!

@MamaMC4950

Ай бұрын

@@daviddadamo2290here are the problems with your argument: you can ask 10 “legal experts” if the POTUS has authority AND responsibility to challenge a federal election and you will get 10 different answers. IF that POTUS was not a candidate in that election, the answers - with various caveats - would almost certainly favor “yes”. In 2020, though, the POTUS was a candidate, so the answers would probably be evenly scattered across the spectrum from yes, to probably, to maybe sometimes, to probably not, to no. And the ONLY reason for the differing answers is “the appearance of it” because of the POTUS being a candidate. But, it should not matter that the POTUS is a candidate. It should not matter because the issue affects not JUST the candidate. It affects the million citizens who VOTED for him!!! The POTUS has a duty to ALL citizens so, when million citizens are CONVINCED that their vote didn’t count because an election was not conducted according to the RULES, he MUST respond. He is OBLIGATED to either CORRECT the vote count OR be able to demonstrate to those people who feel disenfranchised that the vote count was accurate and fair. I can GUARANTEE you that, if Biden had been the losing candidate and Trump had done for Democrat voters EXACTLY what he did for Republican voters, ALL of you would think is was PERFECTLY PROPER for a POTUS to hold up certification and to prepare to have alternate electors ready to go in case Biden had been proven the winner and to call up the Georgia SOS to ask him to recount Fulton County, and to petition a few other states to have their elections nullified because of illegal rule changes having being implemented by people who had no authority to change those rules. ALL of you would be saying these were things that fall squarely into his JOB DESCRIPTION as the CHIEF law enforcement officer in the country.

Jonathan Turley has been a brilliant legal mind for a long time

@emilyalice1

Ай бұрын

He's an idiot

@user-qc9fl3ff8b

Ай бұрын

And guess what…He’s a democrat…I know it’s hard to believe..

@ThePrinceUva

Ай бұрын

Very calm and breaking down things to a manner we can understand

@emilyalice1

Ай бұрын

@@ThePrinceUva But 100% wrong on legal matters.

@feelingold2995

Ай бұрын

@@emilyalice1 🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑

Disturbing that the highest court has to hear this nonsense brought to them by court jesters

@MachiavellisThePrince

Ай бұрын

Calling Trump's team, 'court jesters', is objectively funny.

@ZilogBob

Ай бұрын

@@MachiavellisThePrince Oh ha ha. Gee your comment is hilarious.

@kenneththrasher1152

Ай бұрын

​@@MachiavellisThePrince... give Hunter just crack pipe back, the parmesan cheese is "triggering your TDS"!! Go seek professional help immediately!!🤣🤣🤣

@JamesClark-lw6sw

Ай бұрын

​​@@MachiavellisThePrince Calling YOUR DADDY Biden an actual "President" is what is TRULY funny.

@skechij5856

Ай бұрын

SCOTUS doesn’t HAVE to hear this case, they can pick what cases to handle.

Stop the power of money in our national court system

We elected Trump to lead, and he led. We reelected Trump to lead, and we've been dealing with this vile usurpation ever since.

@justsayin8734

Ай бұрын

You may have voted for him, but he wasn't re-elected. And the proof of that is....................BIDEN is in the White House. Go figure. Come back to reality. If you can.

@jamingoette9062

Ай бұрын

he didn't get reelected, he lost

@lindarock4128

Ай бұрын

@@jamingoette9062 aww i bet mean old orange man hurt ur wittle feeling show us on ur l g b t dolly where it hurts

@josephzerblas9463

Ай бұрын

​@@jamingoette9062he was ROBBED, by many corrupt pieces of trash! And EVERYONE knows that! If you think this abomination got 81 million votes you're a complete mess and in need of serious help!

@DBZFan2

Ай бұрын

​@@jamingoette9062 typical freeloading welfare cheat

The courts better straighten up and stop the abuse of justice, or we will have to straighten these courts out, even if that means removing every last Judge and giving them the Mussolini treatment.

@JamesJAllen-sx5vn

Ай бұрын

Clean up the DOJ from top to bottom. SCOTUS is fine.

Lawyers and talking heads getting very rich off this nonsense!

@christines8529

Ай бұрын

Yes, it is nonsense. And I for one definitely want to hear the opinion of these well-respected legal minds. They all seem to think it's nonsense also.

@richardlindell9976

Ай бұрын

Absolutely 100 percent! Sickening.

@mirnanalphierandoms5488

Ай бұрын

I’m dying to see when Joe Biden loses in November what the Democrats will do ?!

@maninthemiddle55

Ай бұрын

@@christines8529. “Well respected legal minds”? To whom are you referring?

@TheScotthutch

Ай бұрын

@jonboy9912 That sounds like the comment of a simpleton. In the words of Lavrently Beria, (Stalin's chief of secret police) "show me the man, I'll show you the crime". If you think using the police and courts to prosecute one's political opponents is productive, you're a fool because it will go against you anytime your opposition is in control of a court or police dept. - Having us continually at each other's throats. There is a widely covered politically motivated prosecution happening in NYC right now, and most outlets are starting to acknowledge that. Hillary and the DNC were fined a total $115K for running payment for the Steele "dossier" thru their law firm and masking it as "legal fees" in an attempt to hide the truth from voters. This is the same "crime" for which Trump is facing 34 felonies. The party that reads "Rules for Radicals" and promotes "projection" and "lawfare" should rethink it and be more egalitarian.

Amazing what a person's vote can do.

@easynow7425

Ай бұрын

I voted for Trump in 16 and 20. I will not be voting for him in 24. He isn't same person. Losing the election broke Trumps brain. He looks SO small, weak and pathetic now! He isn't the same man! Biden openly mocks him and projects FAR more strength and leadership. This case has just exposed Trump as a weak, small, pathetic and rudderless little man

@zapperbunny1

Ай бұрын

True but this had nothing to do with votes but ballots

Trump needs to fire a bunch of people at the D.O.J. when he's president again!

No way they will do the right thing, they are trying to find a way to weazel out of this mess.

This immunity case axe will fall on the other presidents just as well. They better be praying for immunity because if not they will get repercussions !

@emilyalice1

Ай бұрын

If a POTUS has committed a crime then there should be no immunity for any of them. Why are you MAGA people so twisted and sick that you think a POTUS is a King? Have you not heard of 1776? utter block heads.

@joec9553

Ай бұрын

Who authorized crossfire hurricane?

@dwaynejordan5898

Ай бұрын

you do understand that if a president cannot ever break the law that Biden can call off the upcoming elections and remain in power because he feels like and no prosecution?

@simplemann2165

Ай бұрын

There already is immunity for presidents. The question is how much.

@SJ-vo1bw

Ай бұрын

So if a president orders a strike on the Supreme Court? They should be asked that question. People seem to only be concerned if something affects them personally, then their opinions completely change.

Ray Epps is on video saying the people need to go into the Capitol, and he was only charged with a misdemeanor. Ray Epps was also removed from the FBI's most wanted list after the events of Jan 6

@BuckNasty-du8wj

Ай бұрын

Why did Fox news give Dominion voting Systems $787.5 million?

@BuckNasty-du8wj

Ай бұрын

If you had a brain you might be dangerous

@feelingold2995

Ай бұрын

@@BuckNasty-du8wj 🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑

@xlr8r2010

Ай бұрын

@@BuckNasty-du8wj He isn't lying....you can't disprove anything he said. You are the idiot...not him.

Funny that there is immunity from unlawful prosecution lawyers

@stevenhenry5267

Ай бұрын

Cry harder

@abergreg

Ай бұрын

@@stevenhenry5267 Why are you a silly little fool?

@Magnetroman

Ай бұрын

I wonder wht Biden wil do when he hears he is immune and can do what he wants.

@gailmargret23

Ай бұрын

It doesn't look like scotus is going with the complete immunity argument. They are going to go with immunity for official acts of a president.

@JuddHolmberg

Ай бұрын

​@Magnetroman Same thing he is doing now. Walking all over the Constitution and defy the Supreme Court. And, he gets away with it because he is a Democrat with a weaponized DOJ.

Please explain. How is it ever unlawful for the chief law enforcement officer of the US (the President) to object to what he believes to be unlawful election processes? Simply because he is a person allegedly harmed should never be weighed. Does the President have a duty to call out injustice (real or not) and demand the system and individuals responsible to adjudicate actually do their job? So far, all alleged acts are simply Trump probing and demanding others act as he believed the Constitution compels. People may not like what he did. People may believe his actions further divided the country. None of that matters when contemplating criminal prosecution.

@lancenorton1117

Ай бұрын

So walking around saying the election was stolen over and over is proof that a President has evidence that there was questions about the election? So he gets consolidations from people that say we can just switch electors and boom he wins.

@Shin0bi272

Ай бұрын

Oh its worse than that... the trial in ny now while its ostensibly about the stormy daniels hush money the actual charges are election tampering. The state of NY is saying trump stole the 2016 election! While the DOJ is trying to put him on trial for saying Biden stole the election! You cant get more hypocritical than that!

@simplemann2165

Ай бұрын

Wow, you really haven't been following these cases or the facts regarding your argument right? Swapping the official electors for your electors is an illegal act. Its not just demanding someone to investigate if the election was fair, its several ACTS to actually rob whole states of their votes. Michael johnson actually carried out this plan, but in the end Pence rejected the fake electors at the moment in January 6th. This was orchestrated by Trump and his team. Furthermore, asking another government official to find 11,000 votes that don't exist so that he can win a state is also not legal. And finally, asking/telling, leading a group of people to violently attack the capitol while the election votes are being certified is akin to a military/violent coup. Many of those people were armed, used force, destroyed parts of the buildling attacked police officers defending the capitol injuring several and one who ended up dying from the injuries. and all of this was orchestrated by Trump and his team where in the channels used to communicate, violence was clearly advocated and sought out (they reached out to proud boys and other militant conservative groups).... Are you in love with him? Is that why you ignore all these facts that are so easily verifiable?

@guinsey

Ай бұрын

Trump sued 61 times lost every one over the election that's how they know.

@1969WasYesterday

Ай бұрын

Read the indictment. There’s a reason Fox doesn’t discuss the contents. Ever. He went way, way beyond.

God bless president Donald Trump and his family 😘😘.

@manhandler

Ай бұрын

God said No!

@emilyalice1

Ай бұрын

citizen trump is a conman. Wakey wakey

@bradc6199

Ай бұрын

​@@manhandlerI heard a moron say this exact thing.

@michaelmarceau4863

Ай бұрын

God hates trump.

@TheArtofKelso

Ай бұрын

lol

He is innocent. This entire case is politically motivated. He has been through it, his civil rights have been violated. Shame on the government. This is what the founders feared.

@rdowg

Ай бұрын

Im pretty sure they feared a president claiming immunity from everything he does, let alone the fact it came after he tried his hardest to overthrow the election 😂

@user-zf7or6gz9v

Ай бұрын

Innoce t of what

@stephenduncombe1153

Ай бұрын

A Grand Jury decided to indict, not Biden or anybody else.

@PauletteWinters

Ай бұрын

user. Leave it to a demon-rat to question obvious answers to the political interference. Why ask a question when you won’t except anything that goes against your twisted agenda

@youngmarl9351

Ай бұрын

dont break the law Karen, and youll be fine

Certain principles and standards of our laws require application by reasonable and unbiased judicial officials. Something that is almost entirely lacking in our nation today.

Whose cocaine was that in the White House, Hunter or Joe’s?

@lizziebreath9

Ай бұрын

Porque no los dos?Sorry, I don’t know how to do the accent marks on my keyboard and I love response from the taco commercial. Why not both?

@kennethcheesbrough6855

Ай бұрын

Both of theirs

@BuckNasty-du8wj

Ай бұрын

tRump is a cocaine addict. Has been for years.

@bolarinwaosilesi1352

Ай бұрын

You people are stupid, did it ever occur to you that somebody could have brought it there in other to implicate Biden's presidency: given the facts that so many people have access to the White House.

@randysretired2020

Ай бұрын

Jill’s. 😉

"Sitting President enjoys Absolute Immunity not Qualified Immunity except for serious , heinous crimes." Common Sense

@melaniedelaware7500

Ай бұрын

“serious, heinous crimes” is WAY to ambiguous to mean anything. Nice try though.

@Cavs1975

Ай бұрын

Joe is too much of a cognitive mess to be arrested 😂

@BrandyHeng007

Ай бұрын

@@melaniedelaware7500 Law of Lenity

@emilyalice1

Ай бұрын

You are clearly without any sense

@RonaldNolter-ih4ry

Ай бұрын

Depends WHAT PARTY THE president IS

There was no CRIME!!!!!!!😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡

@stephenkedge6805

Ай бұрын

We dont know.. The corrupt AF american legal system keeps delaying the trail.

@JohnMAdams-nl9zt

Ай бұрын

We don’t know that. And you certainly don’t have any special knowledge on the question. That is exactly what the allegations in the D.C. case are to designed to examine.

@PauletteWinters

Ай бұрын

You won’t believe anything positive. That’s a fact

@lynnjacobs2091

Ай бұрын

Why not??

@youngmarl9351

Ай бұрын

As americans we tend to allow the courts to determine such things.

The government did not argue for zero immunity they really argued that they would choose who and what is prosecuted. Law for thee not for me.

@podunkest

Ай бұрын

Isn't that basically zero immunity? Lol

@johnpollard744

Ай бұрын

@@podunkest Even worse. They decide to prosecute or not.

BEST PRESIDENT EVER. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 TRUMP MAGA 2024 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

@manhandler

Ай бұрын

Not according to bipartisan historians, in fact the very opposite. Of course facts are an inconvenience for cultist.

@eugeneharris6898

Ай бұрын

​@@manhandlerproblem is those historians will be replaced with others that will change rankings based on actual history not political scat. Always happens Carter was last until Biden those inflation numbers are always killers.

@emilyalice1

Ай бұрын

Get Medical Help

@dennisg4053

Ай бұрын

@@manhandler

@slottibarfast5402

Ай бұрын

Fewer people with jobs at the end of his term than at the start. He increased the national debt by twenty-five percent. To be fair Obama did the same but it took him eight years to do what Trump did in four.

Private acts like taking 10% from Ukraine 😂

@charliebrown4697

Ай бұрын

Did gomer tell you that?

@JamesClark-lw6sw

Ай бұрын

​@@mattguastella3018ONLY AFTER 10% IS TAKEN OFF THE TOP BY BIDEN.

@wolfumz

Ай бұрын

Lol ah, another imaginary event you can be upset about, "10% from Ukraine." Just like the fantasy that 2020 was stolen.

@hanshansen3885

Ай бұрын

Where is the evidence?

@bradc6199

Ай бұрын

​@@hanshansen3885there's been tons of evidence. Joy Reid has been derelict by not telling you.

Administration: there’s no reason to fear. Government’s don’t go rogue.

Trump has been the most influential person in forcing the Federal Government to evaluate Constitutional Law.

@Trumpstinks

Ай бұрын

Because Republicans ignore it.

@TrudyPatootie

Ай бұрын

*Yep...and he's NOT even a politician. He is a businessman who deeply* *cares for America. He is a true Patriot! Trump 2024* 💖💫

@scottbrinkerhoff4561

Ай бұрын

@@Trumpstinks - do I have to remind you that US citizenship is defined by Constitutional Law?

@danmccully

Ай бұрын

If you read the "Federalist Papers", considered the Owner's Manual for the Constitution, you will see how much the founding fathers expected character and honor in politicians - if not the politician himself, at least those around them. This is a new situation we're in, where the politician has no limits to his behavior except those externally upon him.

@charliebrown4697

Ай бұрын

Because he wants a free pass to and a get out of jail free card

Well no matter what they decide STATES WILL DO AS THEY PLEASE,THEY ALREADY SHOWED US THIS

Absolute immunity for all official acts for The President, not the VP, not Congressional members nor Administrative officials!

@stloWTF

Ай бұрын

JerKan Erken leave her alone she is mine.

c'mon, don't expect standards out of D.C. courts.

Those are some of the most terrifying words. The government doesn't help without taking something first. Facts!!!!

“How can a president function if he doesn’t have full immunity for official actions” - funny that we never had this problem before 🙄

@alienrenders

Ай бұрын

Exactly! The political prosecutions by the Democrats is disgusting.

@Offskew

Ай бұрын

ummm we have...I have worked on a few Pres News Teams..you have NO idea what Clinton, George W, and Obama did...

@peterlegg7456

Ай бұрын

It's not funny - it's a reflection of corrupt Democrat prosecutors weaponising the justice system. It's very dangerous.

@eugeneharris6898

Ай бұрын

We have always had this problem. The issue is this is the first administration who has felt the need to politically persecute their opponents.

@TheArtofKelso

Ай бұрын

@@eugeneharris6898 Trump isn't being persecuted. He's a criminal being held accountable. Why do you think he wants immunity?

Absolute presidential immunity ?? Wouldntnthis be GREAT NEWS FOR PRESIDENT BIDEN ?

@byronjordan6882

Ай бұрын

Yes indeed. Thanks to the supreme Court.

@user-je4vd9sp5d

Ай бұрын

Should Biden lose he should declare himself dictator, if SCOTUS then rules a President can be prosecuted Trump can then be prosecuted, if SCOTUS rules a President cannot be prosecuted Biden can stay in office forever, if SCOTUS rules neither way in continuing delays to help Trump, then Biden can stay in power as long as he wants until SCOTUS rules.

@jasonwhite6463

Ай бұрын

Shhhh! Let this play out. I am sure Dark Brandon is paying attention.

@patriciacz8622

Ай бұрын

He will never be prosecuted. No Democrat is ever prosecuted. That in itself proves they all have immunity. Only Republicans do not have immunity.

@johnsmith5470

Ай бұрын

Why?

The presidential oath means he is even more obligated to follow the law than any other citizen.

@Edwarddiaz21

Ай бұрын

No.

@henry6451

Ай бұрын

@@Edwarddiaz21 why not? The rest of us do not take an oath to ensure that the laws are upheld.

@Offskew

Ай бұрын

wow...are you gullible...every govt oath is a license to steal...look at the Bidens, Bush League, Clinton, and OBlama

@PauletteWinters

Ай бұрын

Biden for Treason

@jaykilborn2508

Ай бұрын

Okay. President Obama said about predator drone strikes, they give me a list and I decide who lives and who dies. A sixteen year old American boy was killed in one of his ordered drone strikes. When is a local District Attorney going to empanel a grand jury to indict Barack Obama for the crime of killing that American boy? These TDS Democrats have opened up a can of worms.

Good. That helps us understand this crazy case. Thank you.

Gather the top 25% of the entire DOJ into one room address them with the following message… “You are all fired! You have 15mins to vacate the premises.”

Why hasnt trumps team appealed merchan not recusing himself because of the conflicts he has

“I’m not discussing the particulars of this case” Samuel Alito

@PauletteWinters

Ай бұрын

Do you have a point besides the one on your head?

@flyoverstateresident2890

Ай бұрын

@@PauletteWinters Happy your loan was paid off. Next time, take courses that allow you to get a better paying position.

@michaelwood3146

Ай бұрын

@@PauletteWinters Yes

If this isn’t a political prosecution then what the hell is?

So, the DOJ's argument is "Just let us prosecute, we are moral and know what we're doing"?

I wished i was immune from taxation.Since some people don't have to pay off their college tuitions.😁

@StoryModeAJ

Ай бұрын

Weird to be mad about fellow Americans being able to get a weight off of their shoulders... That arguement is basically saying "I'm a Hater". Just sayin..

@harryfarber6435

Ай бұрын

@StoryModeAJ, Weird that how successful Bidenomics is, that you can’t get a job and take care of your own debts, huh?

@65cj55

Ай бұрын

@@StoryModeAJ ''fellow Americans'' should pay their Debts/Loans....your arguement is basically saying i'm a freeloader. Just sayin..

@Notthisguyeither

Ай бұрын

​@@StoryModeAJweird to not be mad about having a "fellow American's" weight shoved onto your shoulders. MORON

@invinoveritas6859

Ай бұрын

@@StoryModeAJ I'm saying it's unfair.😳

The present is immune for every action taken from the minute he is sworn in until 12-00 noon on the day he vacates the Whitehouse

@manhandler

Ай бұрын

So coups are allowed in our constitution then, even murdering a baby on 5th Ave with his foot. You really have a sound understanding of the law and what it says don't you.

@emilyalice1

Ай бұрын

Except that the Constitution disagrees with you

@jeffreyloftus3617

Ай бұрын

There was no coup , Trump questioned the outcome , nothing more or nothing less .

@jeffreyloftus3617

Ай бұрын

No it doesn't . Just the same as did in Nixon v Kennedy , when three Democrats officials declared Kennedy the winner in Hawaii 3 votes to nil despite there having been184705 votes cast , when the result at the time before the recount had Nixon winning the state by 140 votes. The result would not have overturned the overall result of the 1960 election , but the act was declared legal

@eugeneharris6898

Ай бұрын

Not none of them are immune from Impeachment which comes with consequences from the Senate. The Constitution is clear on that. So you have a Grand Jury of 435 and a Jury of 100. Immunity from Article 3 Judicial review which could be referred by the Senate. This was not refered by the Senate but by the politically party in charge.

I think this country has gone mad.

This is a clear Constitutional issue, *Congress* has oversight over the Executive, not the Judiciary. Any form of judicial empowerment is unconstitutional.

Those poor dimorats

The question is not HOW could a President function without immunity, it is WHAT could a President need to do that required them to be free from prosecution?

@robertlucas5090

Ай бұрын

Article 2,section 4 of the constitution debunks such a myth as presidential immunity!

@jessice293

Ай бұрын

Yes! It’s dangerous for a president to have absolute immunity

@omarjacks9788

Ай бұрын

​@@robertlucas5090Impeachment and removal from Office are different from criminal and/or civil prosecution.

@robertlucas5090

Ай бұрын

@@omarjacks9788 conviction of Treason, Bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors is self- explanatory my friend. Hint! Keyword Crimes!

@omarjacks9788

Ай бұрын

@@robertlucas5090 I think the key word is actually 'venue'.

I wonder if the unredacted paperwork that Jack Smith had submitted was given to the scotus?

Ha ha, what's gonna happen when the shoe is on the other foot...

*I just want to acknowledge Leo Terrell...for leaving the left for Patriots.. Thanks Leo!* *I knew you were smart enough to see what was going on! I've been following you for* *years! Trump 2024!* 🥳😎

SO-- How Does someone like brian terry get justice?

I am surprised that Trump's attorney did not remind the court that Trump is not only a former president, but also the current official nominee for the Republican party, and that Trump has been getting classified briefings since he secured the nomination on super Tuesday. I think the court needs to also consider Trump's current status as the nominee, and not just his past status of president. The rule about not indicting and prosecuting a sitting president exists because it would be disruptive. I believe trying to idict and prosecute a presidential nominee is just as disruptive.

Some Judges in States ( Merchan for example) are not following the Constitution and the means of correcting that misbehavior takes years in appeals courts with just a slap on the hands of the Judge! This is unsatisfactory especially when President Trump is being persecuted unfairly!!

Why did Nixon need a pardon then?

@user-yc7mx6sm1i

Ай бұрын

He didn't Fords advisors suggested he do that to avoid shyt like this brought about by an out of control democrat party. Nixon was not even impeached. He resigned under political pressure once again to spare the country from people like you.

@Craigalicioususa

Ай бұрын

Something called Impeachment.... presidential immunity applies until impeachment is completed. Nixon was successfully impeached. Thus, he could be charged. Since they never removed Nixon from office, he pardoned himself. And Trump was never successfully impeached, so his immunity should apply. That's the difference.

@JamesClark-lw6sw

Ай бұрын

​@@Craigalicioususa BECAUSE NIXON WAS A SELF-LOATING COWARD.

@kennethcheesbrough6855

Ай бұрын

Well isn't that a form of immunity? Dah

@jasziegl8983

Ай бұрын

Nixon and watergate is a joke compared to what they have done to Trump: lying to FISA court, spying on him in the white house, raiding mar a lago for having documents there as if they hadnt forced him to move his administration there by compromising the white house, impeaching him for asking about Bidens corrupt threats against a ukranian prosecutor (and it turned out he was right about it), corrupting and wielding the courts and law like they are weapons with endless witch hunts and false charges. I could go on but when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same objext evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism...

Look at all this trouble a few cause, was Mel Gibson right?

@PauletteWinters

Ай бұрын

Demon-rats thrive on chaos. Known fact

Kerri Urbahn, Thank you. Lately when I see you are going to giving a response or are in a panel, I look forward to hearing you. I feel you are very informative. again, Thank you

Gorsuch is an amazing man and is the most closely aligned with original intent of the constitution.

Janathan turley we love you,we the people,we love trump,trump2024WH ❤❤❤❤❤

@emilyalice1

Ай бұрын

Please get an education

i do not see the need for prosecution at all, when he can impeached or removed from office by congress, someone please explain this to me, because going down this line like the DOJ just feels dark

@vinncubus4628

Ай бұрын

Impeachment is a legislative proceeding, not a judicial one

@gm-zz8so

Ай бұрын

exactly right.....impeachment AND conviction are the remedies ....this is Obama lead garbage.

@patriciacz8622

Ай бұрын

It's more than dark. It is just an extension of a long-term ongoing coup by Democrats against our republic. Notice that Democrats are never prosecuted when they are known to have committed actual crimes.

@thelawnfix6100

Ай бұрын

If they give the president immunity that means Biden and DoJ has authority as well..He’s better off taking these lawsuits as a Citizen and not a president. For the sake of any future president. Check mate

@Trumpstinks

Ай бұрын

Congress is biased. A jury must be impartial. Also anything can be brought before Congress, even without evidence. For an arrest, there must be enough evidence to convict, brought to the judge. A crime has to be proven.

It is absolutely the President’s DUTY to ensure fair legal elections and it’s literally outlined in Article 2! It’s not just two lawyers arguing if it’s a thing! Duh

On Jan 6, the vice president has the right to look at the electoral results before the the president-elect takes office. That's an official act.. but Pence punked out.

Whatever happened to timely Congressional impeachment, removal from office and then criminal referral for prosecution?

@lordbread2083

Ай бұрын

What happened to needing evidence first

@Dont.Call.Me.Tall.

Ай бұрын

MConnel said "don't impeach let the courts handle this". Then McCarthy said "Donald Trump bares responsibility in this". Then they realized that killed their carreer, and went right back. 😂

@Dont.Call.Me.Tall.

Ай бұрын

@@lordbread2083 so this is where "needing evidence" comes in? What if Trump has been indicted four times because they have evidence, but the evidence can't come in because of DJT delaying everything? 🤔

@williambrown4058

Ай бұрын

@mdmoz1777 Radical Democrats is what happened.

@lordbread2083

Ай бұрын

@@williambrown4058 what makes someone radical?

Is throwing your food at the walls of the mightiest office in the world an official act?

@asnark7115

Ай бұрын

More importantly, given that no source will attest to it, did it actually happen?

@rofflestomp684

Ай бұрын

Official ketchup stains. LOL

@gailmargret23

Ай бұрын

It's funny how every thing that dig at trump for nobody ever heard or saw happen.

@PauletteWinters

Ай бұрын

Ok. What did CNN tell you now?

@darrenbruessow6754

Ай бұрын

@@PauletteWinters official tomato ketchup wall decor🤔

What is the original country of the DC judge?

Grateful she didn’t call herself First Lady cause that would indeed be a HUGE MISNOMER!!!!

The problem we have is with the actual judges themselves. Even the ones on the Supreme Court. Jackson has no business being on that court. She's a radical left this since Biden is a illegitimate President. Her appointment should not even count. The circuit Court of Appeals judges. I assume are supposed to be highly accredited and experts in their field. And then you get an answer like that. As far as I'm concerned, people every judge in every court should be on the hot seat. I don't care if it's lifetime appointments. We need to get rid of that. No more lifetime appointments because it breeds corruption. And you corrupt judges and we know who you are. Cause all you gotta do is look at the records. Look at the cases your days are numbered. The American people are gonna have their revenge. We gonna have redemption and' nothing going to stop it

@dennisg4053

Ай бұрын

@@ExtremeFear I’m not an economist, but I’ve been doing this a long time,” Biden said. “Here’s the way to look at it: If car prices are too high right now, there are two solutions: You increase the supply of cars by making more of them. Or we reduce demand for cars by making Americans POORER” Joe Biden in New York Post - January 7, 2022 |

@stephenduncombe1153

Ай бұрын

If trump won twice, how can he be president again? Term limits.....

@youngmarl9351

Ай бұрын

all these interpretations of whether they have the right to make Trump accountable for his crimes. But no one on the right is actually considering whether Trump actually did the things he is accused of. Its all about the judge, or the prosecutor, or Hillary, or Hunter's laptop

The idea that you have got an unelected bureau of the executive branch petitioning the Court for a special cut out of executive power to put controls on the office that the Constitution identifies as vested with all executive power, might sound like a pragmatic adjustment, but then again to people who think this, unintended consequences is just a "right-wing talking point", because unintended consequences never happen. (i.e., All consequences are intended). Some people try to make the argument that the Constitution is old and out-of-date at the same time as "The Constitution is on our side", but if you're looking for a fourth corner in the separation of powers, that is not in the Constitution. You have to make one or the other--and then don't brand jurists as "political hacks" simply because they're preferring the Constitution over your naive "innovation" (which nobody voted for).

How does one equal branch of the government determine what another can and can not do, or what is protected by immunity and what is not, can I sue this President because he cost me a lot of money because of his policies, can I do it alone or should I get others to sue as well? Is Obama guilt of a crime for killing Americans using drones? How does the Supreme court determine this, should it not be congress?

@charliebrown4697

Ай бұрын

Hope you don’t find out that trump put us in more debt than the last 4 presidents.

@shel_311

Ай бұрын

​@@charliebrown4697🤦🏻‍♀️

@dwaynejordan5898

Ай бұрын

have you ever heard of checks and balances? Laws passed in congress still needs to be lawful..i.e abide by the constitution...if they so choose they can change the constitution.

@MichaelSmith-os1pp

Ай бұрын

@@dwaynejordan5898 My point exactly thank you

Why is Trump all alone in the courtroom?? Where are his family members??

@brega6286

Ай бұрын

Working !

@Trumpstinks

Ай бұрын

His third wife really wanted to be by his side during his adultery trial, but she has better things to do.

@denisschwartz2943

Ай бұрын

@@Trumpstinks Melania, do you want to hit Stormy Daniel? Mélanie: No, why? I pity this woman for having to endure it for......... seconds!!!!

@JupiterSlim

Ай бұрын

@@brega6286😂 Melania works?

@BatiaAhava

Ай бұрын

They all know he is a liar, cheater, thief, scum bag and Master Grifter!!!

The highest post in the nation should only be tried by the highest court in the nation.

@dwaynejordan5898

Ай бұрын

where is this written?

@lynnjacobs2091

Ай бұрын

@@dwaynejordan5898 The MAGA/Trump Bible!!

First off, people were asked sensible questions and there was no screaming and bashing but a question was answered. Constructive.

We used to have Reagan, Jonny Cash, and Bob Hope. Now we have Biden, no cash, and no hope.

@user-je4vd9sp5d

Ай бұрын

Move to a blue state.

@Trumpstinks

Ай бұрын

Now you have Sandy H Greene, Santos, treason Trump, and Beetlejuice Boebert. Blame yourself.

@TrudyPatootie

Ай бұрын

*Brilliant! Bravo!* 💫 *Trump 2024!* 💖

@joycetaylor8057

Ай бұрын

You need some new material

@suzannen.6403

Ай бұрын

this is old and so are you., trumps going to jail

🤷 they would have to prove that he wasn't upholding his oath to defend the constitution by investigation of the election.... Wich they can't...so

@lordbread2083

Ай бұрын

January 6th wasn't a protest it was an attack

@gelsilicawalker3835

Ай бұрын

BOT

@cafl9844

Ай бұрын

Calling the Secretary of State in Georgia and pressuring him in a one hour long mafia like call to just make up 11780 votes for him out of the thin air, has hardly anything to do with defending the constitution! It has to do with violating it !

@Dubble_Bubble40

Ай бұрын

Which wich or witch or which are you bitchin' 'bout?

@RonaldNolter-ih4ry

Ай бұрын

TRUMP NEVER Held HIS CONSTITUTIONAL Duty's

Great program, thank you

Vote!

How can a President engage in private acts without forcing the executive branch to exist? A private act would mean no executive branch exists during that time because the President alone IS the executive branch. That would mean the executive branch takes a holiday while the President goes off to engage in private acts. The Supreme Court recently ruled the Constitution does not take a holiday even during a pandemic. This would be no different. The President can only engage in a private act if the VP is first sworn in as acting President to allow the President to engage in a private act. Otherwise all acts are official acts no matter what it is because the President is always in his official capacity. Absent the President taking a leave from office by having the VP sworn in as acting President, there is no such thing as a private act while the President is in his official capacity.

@melaniedelaware7500

Ай бұрын

Ummmmm….the executive branch consists of more than the President alone.

@johnlyn1

Ай бұрын

@@melaniedelaware7500 Yeah, they serve as the HANDS of the President at his pleasure. The President alone IS the executive branch. Without the President they wouldn't exist.

@johnlyn1

Ай бұрын

@@melaniedelaware7500 BTW, the courts have ruled this. “The Constitution itself places no limit on the President’s authority to act on matters which concern him or his own conduct. On the contrary, the Constitution’s grant of law enforcement power to the President is plenary. Constitutionally, it is wrong to conceive of the President as simply the highest officer within the Executive branch hierarchy. He alone is the Executive branch. As such, he is the sole repository of all Executive powers conferred by the Constitution. Thus, the full measure of law enforcement authority is placed in the President’s hands, and no limit is placed on the kinds of cases subject to his control and supervision. While the President has subordinates --the Attorney General and DOJ lawyers -- who exercise prosecutorial discretion on his behalf, they are merely “his hand,” Ponzi v. Fessenden, 258 U.S. 254, 262 (1922) - the discretion they exercise is the President’s discretion, and their decisions are legitimate precisely because they remain under his supervision, and he is still responsible and politically accountable for them.”

@emilyalice1

Ай бұрын

Wrong. The POTUS can and does act in a private capacity even while the VP is acting as a V.P. The VP does not need to be sworn in as POTUS for the POTUS to be acting in a private capacity. There is nothing in case law or the Constitution to support your argument. If there is, please state it.

@johnlyn1

Ай бұрын

@@emilyalice1 The VP is not acting as a VP. The VP is the VP. Article II vests ALL the executive powers in the President and the President alone. The President IS the Executive Branch. Everyone else within the Executive Branch serve at the pleasure of the President for his benefit alone. They are merely his hands. If the President who alone IS the Executive Branch was allowed to go off and act in a personal capacity that would literally mean the Executive Branch becomes abandoned because the President cannot be two things at once. Because the President alone IS the Executive Branch he is always in his official capacity 24/7 even while he sleeps, while he vacations and while he does anything that is even for his own personal benefit. It is in fact an official act by the President, not a personal act as a private citizen. Once the President takes the oath of office he is no longer a private citizen. He is the President who becomes a sovereign power as the Executive Branch of Government. The ONLY way the President can ever act outside of his official capacity as President is only if he steps down to take a leave of office which would in fact require the VP to be sworn in as the acting President until the President is able to return to office in his official capacity. This is why the VP was sworn in as acting President when President Reagan had to have a medical procedure that required him to be put under and the same when Bush had to and the same when Biden had to and Kamala Harris was sworn in as acting President until Biden was able to return to his official capacity. Otherwise there would not have been any need for them to be sworn in as acting President. If anything did happen where any of those Presidents did not recover they could have sworn the VP in at that time where they would have become President. Why do you think they were sworn in as acting President? Because if they weren't the Executive Branch would be completely abandoned without a President able to serve in an official capacity. That can never be allowed because the Executive Branch cannot be allowed to be abandoned where it would literally cease to exist for any period of time, even if for just a few minutes. The President is the only person that is in his official capacity every second of every day from the moment he takes the oath of office to the moment he leaves office. The only exception is if the President is unable to serve in an official capacity and the VP is sworn in as actine President until the President is able to return in his official capacity. See the 25th Amendment Section 3. Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President. If a President acts in a personal capacity then he is in fact unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office since it is literally impossible to do both at the same moment in time. If the President is acting in a personal capacity then he is not in his official capacity. If he is in his official capacity then he cannot be in a personal capacity. Since President Trump never stepped aside by having the VP step in as acting President then everything he did was in his official capacity and a Presidential act, not a personal act.

What a crock, and a YUGE waste of money and resources, and more importantly the lack of standing as it were, wasting the most valuable time of the SCOTUS, the Arbiter General of your United States of America, or is that only applied when it is the GOP attempting to table?

@rofflestomp684

Ай бұрын

Not a waste of time. If it's broke, you fix it! I'm not sure how you do it in the third world and I don't really care.

@emilyalice1

Ай бұрын

Speak English

@dennisg4053

Ай бұрын

The War in Ukraine WOULD have ended in 2022. Russia, Ukraine, France & Germany had ALL agreed to a Peace Solution. Then the Biden Inc State dept.... Convinced Ukraine to drop that deal.. In exchange for a LOT more Taxpayers $$$

My take: Vacate and remand to the DC Circuit with instructions. 6-3. The DC Circuit MAY reconsider, OR more likely, will send it back to the trial court.

We The People Are The Voice And Together As One ☝️ Brothers And Sisters 👯‍♀️ All Across Our Beloved Nation United States Of America 🇺🇸 We Will Always Stand And Respect 🫡 Our Supreme Court Justices And May They Always Stand Strong In Faith And Truth And Wisdom And Courage As A Lion Fearless Amen 🙏

Listening to these guys deny the reality of what was presented is as apalling as Barr's rewriting the mueller report before it was even released.

@Edward-eo5fv

Ай бұрын

What Barr wrote sure was not to favor Trump.

@henry6451

Ай бұрын

@@Edward-eo5fv it rewrote the entire outcome including stating that there was no Russian collusion. And the MAGA cultists bought it.

@henry6451

Ай бұрын

If MAGA knew the truth they would not think Barr’s version was critical of him. Especially his identification as a co-conspirator who was not indicted only because he was president. Another reason (alongside the two impeachments +++++） why he was always going to be indicted post presidency.

@user-xp2xs6pj5j

Ай бұрын

It is Faux News! Where they spin like tops! And the audience isn't exactly the brightest bulbs in the box.

@skoolwheelz9042

Ай бұрын

@@Edward-eo5fv lol....guess who endorsed Trump.....

Fox News is a dead source 😂😂😂 CNN ABC MSNB all gaining millions of views per video. Fox struggling to break 30k. Dead program and a dead political stand point. I’m no longer a republican. May the Republican Party rest in peace. Amen 🙏

@mickiepisces

Ай бұрын

Amen

"I need total immunity from the crimes I did not commit."

Well now they are laying down the stepping stones to throw these corrupt swamp creatures in prison for life

What a joke this Panel is 😅

@rofflestomp684

Ай бұрын

No lack of weak minds at Fox.

✊Maga Lyfe, Maga Power✊ 💪💪 🇺🇲 Trump '24🇺🇲

@user-ip3mq2up4k

Ай бұрын

@@vinncubus4628 I 💯% agree with you brother, Maga Power.

Good job

Gorsuch is the best Supreme Court Justice in decades. He understands the role and limitations of the judicial branch.

Is it true that the SUPREME COURT is moving to mari Lago ?????????????????????????

I thought the president of the United States should be enforcing the law. How can you set a example for the country when you don't follow the laws yourself? IM CONFUSED

@michaelshapiro1543

Ай бұрын

President Donald Trump WAS "FOLLOWING the LAW". The idea he was NOT is mistaken. (Mostly deliberately, sometimes ignorantly.) As I expect we'll see. I hope your confusion will be addressed & resolved. Cheers!

@antlivejj

Ай бұрын

Trump iss guilty, and everything around him. The sad part is, everyone around him goes to jail except him.

@PauletteWinters

Ай бұрын

Ask Biden.

@PauletteWinters

Ай бұрын

So you are the jury? Since demon-rats don’t believe “innocent till proven guilty “ guess that just shoots out the window? Change the goal posts are a typical demon-rat trait

@feelingold2995

Ай бұрын

@@antlivejj Guilty of what?🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑