We have to stop saying they kicked him OFF the ballot. The Colorado supreme court ruled that he was not eligible to be ON the ballot. The onus is on him! He does not meet the requirements for the position.

@LuisGarcia-kh9up

5 ай бұрын

They went with the evidence and the constitution and it doesn’t matter if it is the first time it should never be a second

@danielmankinde1706

5 ай бұрын

@@LuisGarcia-kh9upso anyone can be accused without being charged and boom, not allowed to run. Who interpreted what an insurrection without any jury and cross reference of evidence

@curtisleeyork1978

5 ай бұрын

Sure he does. You are just stalling g. I really dont blame you lol. Polls are bad for you

@cruisemissile2873

5 ай бұрын

So who meets the requirements? A black gay woman?

@larryfranklin

5 ай бұрын

@@danielmankinde1706 "so anyone can be accused without being charged and boom, not allowed to run." Trump was convicted of insurrection over a month ago. It was a trial in Federal court. Please try to keep up. Case number 2023CV32577 Colorado Federal Districe Court. Judge Sarah B. Wallace, final order Nov 17, 2023. "The Court concludes, based on its findings of fact and the applicable law detailed above, that Trump incited an insurrection on January 6, 2021 and therefore “engaged” in insurrection. Trump acted with the specific intent to disrupt the Electoral College certification of President Biden’s electoral victory through unlawful means; specifically, by using unlawful force and violence."

First they came for alex jones, and i was happy, because he told a lot of lies. then they came for rudy giuliani and I thought it was even better. Then they came for trump and i was like "this is great!" And then they came for me… Oh wait, no they didn’t, because I didn’t break any laws

@Raul-gc8lc

5 ай бұрын

You sound like a Jan. 6 insurrectionist in hiding.

@marioarias9942

5 ай бұрын

Holding liars accountable isn’t ‘coming’ after them , they were sued for defamation and found guilty by our justice system.

@LuisGarcia-kh9up

5 ай бұрын

Excellent point and clearly easy to understand only by a mistake you would get pickup

@connieb4372

5 ай бұрын

Got THAT right.. yet they are not bothered in the least.

@jmthunk

5 ай бұрын

Right! Don't break any laws then they won't come after you.

Imagine having a supreme court that doesn't want to protect the constitution. Utter disgrace.

@reason6835

5 ай бұрын

Or maybe they’ll just uphold our right to due process. 🤷‍♂️

@letsgorandall9848

5 ай бұрын

Own what grounds.

@reason6835

5 ай бұрын

@@jerryjerry7561: “Jenius?” LMFAO!

@zynathera8140

5 ай бұрын

How so? The court can refuse to hear this because the constitution makes elections the responsibility of the states. If they elect not to hear it then trump is off the ballot in Maine.

@bloopgoesdonald6045

5 ай бұрын

​@@kissmyaxe531swing and a miss whomp whomp whomp

SCOTUS, DO YOUR JOB! This sitting back and watching this country tear itself apart really says it all about you and what you consider your responsibilities to this country and to the US Constitution to be about. DO YOUR JOB!

@curtisleeyork1978

5 ай бұрын

He will stay on ballot

@yayamoviereview3438

5 ай бұрын

Yet they wasted no time with Roe v Wade

@jurgenbosselmann6437

5 ай бұрын

These judges appear to prefer their job's payments - but not really the work.

@parslowpongbert1566

5 ай бұрын

Problem is the Supreme Court shares the same ‘donors’ with the Republican party.

@Thomas-jl3gn

5 ай бұрын

​@@jurgenbosselmann6437 They are doing the work they were paid to perform.

Whether or not Trump "engaged" in the insurrection, he gave the insurrectionists aide and/or comfort which is clearly documented on video. Trump, along with several sitting Congressmen, Congresswomen and Senators, should be disqualified from holding office.

@LuisGarcia-kh9up

5 ай бұрын

Yes and that was cristal clear it’s not a guess it’s a fact anybody that do that democrats or republicans most face the law and go to jail if proven and the tapes don’t lye

@larryross1819

5 ай бұрын

It’s late 2024, and democrats/socialists/communists are getting desperate. Maybe it’s clear Trump is going to win beyond any imaginable margin of election fraud. Maybe they realize when 140% of registered voters cast ballots nationwide, Americans are going to make the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror look like a Girl Scout picnic. Maybe all those dead voters are ready to turn state’s evidence. Either way, they’re certain they’re going to jail-or worse--and not on trumped-up political charges. It’s time for martial law! The question is, will our military fight for Joe Biden, who wants them to imprison, torture and kill Normal Americans? Higher Ranking Officers: Since the Age of Obama, have been doing their best to replace warfighters with social justice warriors. Few get that first star without enthusiastically toeing the DEI line. Many, but not all, of these beribboned REMFs will gladly go full totalitarian. Mid-Ranking Officers : Many of these are also DEI adherents, but probably fewer than those above them. Many joined thinking they’d be warriors and haven’t had time to be completely converted, or to decide to bail out with their sanity. Lower Ranking Officers : They’re even less likely to go over to the dark side, except those that joined as true believers. Here’s where things get interesting: Senior NCOs: These are the people who really run the military. They often bark “don’t call me ‘sir!” I work for a living!” And they do. Nothing happens without them. Those in longest, nearing retirement, have either been converted, or are sticking out their 20, silently resisting the lunacy. The proportions will vary from base to base. Lower-Ranking NCOs: They too make the military work. Shorter on time than their higher-ranking fellows, a lesser portion of these will be willing to oppress fellow Americans. They’re far more likely to gum up the works. “Gosh Captain, those tanks just won’t run, and the helos are shot. Somehow a lot of parts got misplaced, and we’re missing essential tools. We might be able to get a couple Hummers running by, say, Tuesday. What is running? The General’s staff car is pretty good, and so are the carts at the golf course. Sorry about that, Sir!” Enlisted: This is going to be a big problem for Biden. Who voluntarily enlists in the military? Largely people from the South and Midwest, particularly sons and daughters of families with military traditions. Even with recruiting crashing, most of those enlisting are patriots, willing to brave the DEI lunacy to serve. How many purple-haired, nose and nipple-pierced vegans are enlisting, and how many of those are going to be combat effective? Sure, some of the queer are enlisting for free trans surgery, but they’re all going to be non-deployable, and little more than stationary targets on the battlefield if they’re somehow forced into the field. The National Guard: Forget it. They’re going to kill their families, neighbors, pastors and friends? The people they’ve grown up with and live with? What they are going to do is walk away with as many weapons, as much ammo and other gear as they can carry and haul in the trucks they’re going to take with them. A few higher-ranking, idiot true-believers might try to stop them, might even try to use deadly force. Heh. To be sure, there will be some social justice warriors that will turn traitor out of a misplaced sense of duty, or just because they want to be on what they think will be the winning side. But even now, most people in our military love America and Americans. They’re the people buying the guns, living the American military ethic of duty, honor and country. They like Red Dawn and The Patriot. They’re not going to kill fellow Americans. They know who America’s enemies are. Who are the few that will? They’re the people who shrink from killing our actual enemies, people who haven’t won a war in decades, people who can’t bring themselves to kill the demons that would gladly murder every American. They surely get excited, however, about strafing Des Moines, or nuking South Dakota. Suzie Soccer Mom and traditional Catholics are so much easier to beat than actual armies. Most of our military-probably enough-will either just walk away, or will fight for liberty, taking as much materiel with them, and sabotaging the rest, as they can. Many will try to go neutral, but won’t be able to maintain that for long !W!W!

@rtqii

5 ай бұрын

The government has convictions for Seditious Conspiracy. 18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy charges instead of 18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Insurrection or rebellion. § 2384 covers insurrection and rebellion by definition.

@MJMcKenzie322

5 ай бұрын

Just to be clear, there’s a difference between giving comfort to someone and talking them down. He was telling them to go home, saying things like “you’re very beautiful” to deagitate them.

@MJMcKenzie322

5 ай бұрын

@@mrsmibbs I was waiting for this. You know how people have been saying that Trump waited until the building was breached to send the tweet telling the protesters to go home? Well, a new video came out disproving that. The building hadn’t been breached yet when the tweet was sent. I’m sure you could find that video if you searched it up.

5 Republicans filed in Maine. The Secretary of State of Maine followed the law and process.

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

OK, so who are these 5 Republicans so we can verify this?

@JoeNarbaiz

5 ай бұрын

​@@Reaper-cm4jrDo you know how to do a Google search? 😮

@michaelmorningstar8645

5 ай бұрын

​@@Reaper-cm4jrYou fascists are lazy.. He's an insurrectionist and inelegable, as if his complete incompetence wasn't enough.

@NPC13377

5 ай бұрын

Yes there are establishment members on both sides

@guyjackson132

5 ай бұрын

There were 3 challenges by 5 people: One by registered voter Mary Ann Royal...party affiliation unknown. One by registered voter Paul Gordon...party affiliation unknown. One by 3 registered voters...Kimberly Rosen (Republican), Thomas Saviello (Republican) and Ethan Strimling (Democrat). All this information is found on the Maine SoS's ruling and is a public record easily found.

SCOTUS needs to make a ruling on this as soon as possible.

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

Why are you in such a hurry?

@zynathera8140

5 ай бұрын

Or not. If they refuse to hear it then the ruling stands as written - I.e trump can’t be on the ballot. Granted hearing it would probably at least create uniformity across the country. But it’s the states that make their rules about elections so it’s at least plausible they just leave it to the states.

@frederickmurray5766

5 ай бұрын

I have a suspicion that the SC will not accept to hear the case thus letting rulings stand. For them, it is a case of damned if you do, damned if you don't...and this SC does not inspire much confidence.

@larryfranklin

5 ай бұрын

@@frederickmurray5766 They will likely rule that he remain on the ballot pending appeal of his insurrection conviction, but they couldn't overturn that before November even if they wanted to. They can't even hear the case until the appeals have all been exausted, and Trump hasn't even filed in appellate court yet. I suspect he thinks he can bypass the appellate courts - which SCOTUS just ruled against regarding the immunity claim. He's finished.

@aaronmcintosh2903

5 ай бұрын

Your SCOTUS is absolutely ridiculous for not have already made one.

"If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts; if you have the law on your side, pound the law; if you have neither the facts nor the law, pound the table."

@Finn_MacCool

5 ай бұрын

So we are all supposed to fall for this cheesy imagine of Trump furiously pounding the table with clenched fist and angry face.🙄

@Mark_Brooks

5 ай бұрын

@@Finn_MacCool No, you're supposed to respect the law unlike your floor pooping buddies in prison.

@fumrious

5 ай бұрын

Or pound sand

@annakingry9157

5 ай бұрын

In Trump's case, mock and slander anyone who tries to hold you to lawful behavior.

@SandmanAlpha4

5 ай бұрын

That's why Trumps wittle hands hurt

Why does mainstream media keep acting as if trump is a credible person

@ardentynekent2099

5 ай бұрын

It’s not just media and it’s irritating. He’s mad as a hatter. Non compos mentis. And they’re chatting away as if the fact of his mania doesn’t exist.

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

Dang, you thought: what could I say that every partisan democrat would agree with? The proceeded to type it out on the most partisan democrat channel there is and still only receive 5 likes. my my. I'll make it 6 for trying so hard.

@lukkke9

5 ай бұрын

Not pro or against trump personally…. But not credible is an ignorant … very ignorant comment. I know nothing about you but I can almost bet the house that you are not an accomplished person or strive to be better. You my friend are probably a “dreamer”, always victim , dreaming about the stuff you want but look at your actions and have not moved a needle on any of them the past…. Your whole life. Nothing bad with this, it seems to be most people that comment this type of stuff. Hopefully I’m wrong but if not, hopefully you can self reflect. The man is a business tycoon. He has been for some time in America, if you didn’t know. Definitely credible in some things …. Others I’m sure not so much.

@lukkke9

5 ай бұрын

@@Habib_Osmanright… I could only image the lack of attention or self reflecting they receive/do. Ignorance is bliss

@user-rk7rl2dh9q

5 ай бұрын

Dang ,republican hypocrisy at its best. The mainstream media is bought and paid for by the same corporations that fund lying FOX News. That’s why they give credibility to dumpfs.

It really seems that the law is dragging its feet when coming to Trump

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

You mean like when the DOJ ran out a 5 year Statute Of Limitations so Hunter couldn't be charged with several Tax Evasion Felonies? That kind of "Dragging Their Feet"?

@hgfku-tn6hb

5 ай бұрын

This is the worst criminal that should be in prison as we speak ​@@kissmyaxe531

@shannonhardee5449

5 ай бұрын

Election interference . The Judges set the court dates, I believe.

@roseserrano7047

5 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@Mark_Brooks

5 ай бұрын

Come on down Trumpie trolls! Little Mikey Hall, Kiss My Axe, and more! Their Jan.6th buddies in prison are asking them why they are forgetting them and arguing bullsh!t on the internet.

The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people but the silence over that by the good people. Martin Luther King, Jr.

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

Yeah. Republicans can do nothing but remain silent on this issue. Let it be stricken down in SCOTUS hard and fast and let's never talk about it again. What a disgusting act by these partisan judges. The judicial system is supposed to be blind, not hardcore partisan.

I enjoyed listening to Shenna Bellows.. she doesn't stumble her words, she's concise and direct. Not once did she um, um, um . Explained very clearly.

@yayamoviereview3438

5 ай бұрын

You can tell that she is a dependable, upright person. She already had him on the ballot until voters objected. She had no problem with it until her position made her look into it. It's her job.

@GotoHere

5 ай бұрын

Unlike the mumbling incoherent teleprompter reading, dementia, criminal, corrupt, puppet installed named Biden.

@charleslarry2607

5 ай бұрын

This is political you are making it easy for Trump to campaign against the Dems

@richardvale214

5 ай бұрын

@@charleslarry2607Lotta good it will do him. As even Bill Barr acknowledged, “Trump’s toast”.

@lesliejaggers2275

5 ай бұрын

@@charleslarry2607no. This is legal- Its about his crimes that prevent him from being on the ballots-

Why is presidential immunity even a question? I thought your Revolution got rid of absolute monarchs.

@martyrhodes9839

5 ай бұрын

It's mostly a delay tactic by the Trump lawyers. Even the Trump toadies don't think he will win the motion. But Trump has gotten a stay order on the case while the appeal of the motion takes place so the delay tactic has worked as Trump's team intended.

@Eddy41020

5 ай бұрын

so you think millions of ppl should be free to sue trump for jan 6 for Trump Derangement syndrome

@strombouts

5 ай бұрын

​@@Eddy41020there are so many things they should be able to sue him for.

@TheBruce571

5 ай бұрын

The oligarchy put these rules in place. They tried to rig 2016 by having the dhs hack states like Georgia. They failed. They never expected someone that wasn't in the club to get in.

@Tola5657

5 ай бұрын

​@Eddy41020 you don't trust the courts ? If you don't trust them why are there good enough for all other people there not name Trump on a daly basic

They want to sit on their asses and hand down personal laws, but hate upholding constitutional laws that helps democracy.

@wadestanton

5 ай бұрын

They upheld the US Constitution in Scott v Sandford, what a disgraced document.

Trump asked for and received help from Russia to beat Hillary in 2016, let's not forget about that.

@realtimebiblicalinterpreta6972

5 ай бұрын

Trump took nuclear and military secrets information and kept them insecurely at his home, possibly already given to Russia

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

Президент Байден, мой хороший друг. Мы в Российской Федерации поддерживаем вас и с нетерпением ждем еще четырех славных лет. Товарищ Путин шлет вам все самое лучшее, и он посылает вам очень щедрое пожертвование.

@ethelryan257

5 ай бұрын

You misspelled 'Trump'. It came out as Байден when you meant Трамп.@@Reaper-cm4jr

@DAndyLord

5 ай бұрын

@@Reaper-cm4jr Google translate has done you a disservice.

@seabreezecoffeeroasters7994

5 ай бұрын

@@kissmyaxe531 When your head is up the tRump hearing anything not screamed or typed in all caps is clearly hard for you

uphold 14th amendment. remove trump

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

Uphold the 5th Amendment, give him Due Process.

@SandmanAlpha4

5 ай бұрын

He's not good for the future

@larryross1819

5 ай бұрын

It’s late 2024, and democrats/socialists/communists are getting desperate. Maybe it’s clear Trump is going to win beyond any imaginable margin of election fraud. Maybe they realize when 140% of registered voters cast ballots nationwide, Americans are going to make the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror look like a Girl Scout picnic. Maybe all those dead voters are ready to turn state’s evidence. Either way, they’re certain they’re going to jail-or worse--and not on trumped-up political charges. It’s time for martial law! The question is, will our military fight for Joe Biden, who wants them to imprison, torture and kill Normal Americans? Higher Ranking Officers: Since the Age of Obama, have been doing their best to replace warfighters with social justice warriors. Few get that first star without enthusiastically toeing the DEI line. Many, but not all, of these beribboned REMFs will gladly go full totalitarian. Mid-Ranking Officers : Many of these are also DEI adherents, but probably fewer than those above them. Many joined thinking they’d be warriors and haven’t had time to be completely converted, or to decide to bail out with their sanity. Lower Ranking Officers : They’re even less likely to go over to the dark side, except those that joined as true believers. Here’s where things get interesting: Senior NCOs: These are the people who really run the military. They often bark “don’t call me ‘sir!” I work for a living!” And they do. Nothing happens without them. Those in longest, nearing retirement, have either been converted, or are sticking out their 20, silently resisting the lunacy. The proportions will vary from base to base. Lower-Ranking NCOs: They too make the military work. Shorter on time than their higher-ranking fellows, a lesser portion of these will be willing to oppress fellow Americans. They’re far more likely to gum up the works. “Gosh Captain, those tanks just won’t run, and the helos are shot. Somehow a lot of parts got misplaced, and we’re missing essential tools. We might be able to get a couple Hummers running by, say, Tuesday. What is running? The General’s staff car is pretty good, and so are the carts at the golf course. Sorry about that, Sir!” Enlisted: This is going to be a big problem for Biden. Who voluntarily enlists in the military? Largely people from the South and Midwest, particularly sons and daughters of families with military traditions. Even with recruiting crashing, most of those enlisting are patriots, willing to brave the DEI lunacy to serve. How many purple-haired, nose and nipple-pierced vegans are enlisting, and how many of those are going to be combat effective? Sure, some of the queer are enlisting for free trans surgery, but they’re all going to be non-deployable, and little more than stationary targets on the battlefield if they’re somehow forced into the field. The National Guard: Forget it. They’re going to kill their families, neighbors, pastors and friends? The people they’ve grown up with and live with? What they are going to do is walk away with as many weapons, as much ammo and other gear as they can carry and haul in the trucks they’re going to take with them. A few higher-ranking, idiot true-believers might try to stop them, might even try to use deadly force. Heh. To be sure, there will be some social justice warriors that will turn traitor out of a misplaced sense of duty, or just because they want to be on what they think will be the winning side. But even now, most people in our military love America and Americans. They’re the people buying the guns, living the American military ethic of duty, honor and country. They like Red Dawn and The Patriot. They’re not going to kill fellow Americans. They know who America’s enemies are. Who are the few that will? They’re the people who shrink from killing our actual enemies, people who haven’t won a war in decades, people who can’t bring themselves to kill the demons that would gladly murder every American. They surely get excited, however, about strafing Des Moines, or nuking South Dakota. Suzie Soccer Mom and traditional Catholics are so much easier to beat than actual armies. Most of our military-probably enough-will either just walk away, or will fight for liberty, taking as much materiel with them, and sabotaging the rest, as they can. Many will try to go neutral, but won’t be able to maintain that for long.

@charleslarry2607

5 ай бұрын

The media has sold us a bag of goods there was no insurrection nobody had any weapons this is political no one person can overturn an election that saying the Falcons are going to the Superbowl

@TheBruce571

5 ай бұрын

If they uphold the 14th they won't remove Trump.

The one certainty in all legal matters is that Trump will offer no evidence to support any of his legal positions and challenges.

@garufia

5 ай бұрын

Nor any evidence to support an acquittal in any and all his cases. In deed, his only play is "delay" and nothing more makes this evident.

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

When fighting a baseless ruling of a court, there is no evidence to bring. So.. You are technically correct.

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

And that's why the supreme court will easilly demolish both Colorado's and Maine's partisan decisions with great ease. Possibly by a 9 out of 9 decision, that would truly be a massive rejection and humiliation to both those courts.

@brandonm2520

5 ай бұрын

I wonder when they are going to charge anyone with insurrection?? 🤔 They better hope their narrative keeps fooling people and swaying public opinion.

@ronthered138

5 ай бұрын

Don't worry. That evidence is coming. Probably about the same time as the Rapture!

Trump should be in prison for treason.

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

Except you democRAT's can't seem to convict him of ANYTHING despite SEVEN YEARS and TWO Impeachments.

@RBS314

5 ай бұрын

A long time ago.

@danielmankinde1706

5 ай бұрын

Why didn’t the DOJ charge him? Why is this coming one year before election

@curtisleeyork1978

5 ай бұрын

Lol Biden is the one committing treason

@cruisemissile2873

5 ай бұрын

We have a president right now who has the border wide open and who has allowed an invasion into the country. That is bigger than any insurrection.

THIS Maine Lady is brave . 👍👍💪

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

Because YOU agree with her?

@erikvanshier4138

5 ай бұрын

@@Reaper-cm4jr yes she did her duty although she new that she will come under a lot of pressure

@1Indykid

5 ай бұрын

Shes a ninny

@erikvanshier4138

5 ай бұрын

@@StructuredConciousness sorry not a nativ english speaker . what do you mean with inclusion

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

@@erikvanshier4138 OK, so if what she did was by the law, why are you so worried about The US Supreme Court verifying that?

Thank you, John Dean, for living long enough to give your perspective on these matters.

Shenna Bellows - champion of the Constitution and the people. 💪

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

Well Champion of The democRATic Party at least.

@strombouts

5 ай бұрын

​@@Reaper-cm4jryet another lame troll comment from you.

@Steve-qf8vt

5 ай бұрын

More like rabid partisan denies candidate due process.

@stephenchechowitz1432

5 ай бұрын

Good work for a Communist State Like Maine

@nevadadesertrat267

5 ай бұрын

You did mean the communist manifesto didnt you? NDR

What's this? Trump is accusing his accuser? Why I never...

@nigratruo

5 ай бұрын

Remember: Every accusation with him is a confession that he did it himself.

@brianchase9251

5 ай бұрын

@@nigratruo He's been committing crimes since the 1970s. It's well known. Yet millions of Americans support him. It's mind-boggling.

Obviously, Shenna Bellows is biased in favor of the law. It's her obligation to favor the law above the law breaker, Trump. Trump should prove that he above the law or accept that he is not.

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

As a life long Democrat I'm sure she is being 100% to the law on this one---Right???

@fjalics

5 ай бұрын

I'm kind of tired of everybody caring so much about what tRump says. The noise to signal ration is really high. If he has evidence for an assertion, fine, but if stinky is just spouting opinion, why do we take it seriously?

@livelife4471

5 ай бұрын

Not biased - more like duty bound to follow the law.

@scottmcandrew9642

5 ай бұрын

Reaper-cm4jr English isn’t your first language and it shows

@ConnieWojahn

5 ай бұрын

@@Reaper-cm4jr Please listen to her again, and this time, LISTEN.

Clarence doesn't want to rule against Ginny's chosen one

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

And would Brown-Jackson EVER rule against Biden?

@KB-ld6ql

5 ай бұрын

Recuse

@ardentynekent2099

5 ай бұрын

I thought that villain had recused?

@rosex3271

5 ай бұрын

That was why the Mueller investigation went away‼️ 😰😱😵🙄😩🤷🙅🤦🤮🤢🤬 If we allow powerful and money hungry MAGA RepubliCONS to continue their crimes, corruptions, briberies, frauds, spread lies, disinformation, misinformation, conspiracy theories, propagandas, and etc. without responsibilities and accountabilities then sooner or later United States of America is DIVIDED STATES OF AMERICA and democracy is history‼️ 😢😭😰😱🤮🤢🤬

@paradoxmo

5 ай бұрын

Thomas recused only in a very minor case involving John Eastman, probably the least important of the cases involving Jan 6.

Supreme Court likely doesn’t want to face the Constitution

@reason6835

5 ай бұрын

They’ll uphold the due process clause of the 14th amendment.

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

Yes, I'm sure you know more about Constitutional Law than NINE Supreme Court Justices--Right?

@zynathera8140

5 ай бұрын

The can rule in 100% agreement with the constitution by declining to hear the case at all. The constitution is clear that the states are responsible for how they administer the elections.

@zynathera8140

5 ай бұрын

@@reason6835it’s possible of course. But since this isn’t a criminal issue it seems highly unlikely that will enter into the argument.

@donaldducko6580

5 ай бұрын

The national debt is $34,001,493,655,565.48 and Biden was in office for ALL of it. Trump isn’t the problem.

I want this to go to SCOTUS. THE CONSTITUTION IS LAW. Time to make it real beyond the theoretical.

@rosex3271

5 ай бұрын

Do we really want MAGA SCOTUS to rule and highly possible in political favor of Trumpty Dumbty⁉️ 🤔😰😱😵🙄😩🤷🙅🤦🤮🤢🤬

If the Supreme Court doesn’t rule on this it’ll mean that the Colorado ruling, and pretty much any other ruling that disqualifies him, will stand in the end

Note: Project 2025 is a plan to reshape the executive branch of the U.S. federal government in the event of a Republican victory in the 2024 United States presidential election. It was established in 2022 by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, and other right-leaning groups. It consists of four pillars: a policy agenda, a personnel database, a training program, and a 180-day playbook. The project aims to recruit tens of thousands of conservatives to replace existing federal civil service workers, implement a maximalist version of the unitary executive theory, and pursue the objectives of the next Republican president. The project has been criticized by some as a blueprint for overthrowing the federal government and erasing the democratic safeguards.

@sandiegotrafficlightstrain354

5 ай бұрын

I'm voting blue because I stand with the truth and democracy.

@jerrywilkjr.6698

5 ай бұрын

I hope these initiatives are successful.

@stanbyme7874

5 ай бұрын

It’s anti American. It is one Party taking over. They think their "Rules" are better than the Constitution. We are a Democracy. Love it or hate it. We NEED a variety of Voices. Democracy allows BOTH Parties voices to be heard & respected. Project 2025 will destroy that process. Be Adults. Allow All Voices. ✊🏽🗳️💙

@THT01

5 ай бұрын

I used to like dystopian movies. I no longer watch them. We are living in dystopian times.

@reason6835

5 ай бұрын

This country is doomed either way.

When someone is elected President he is, basically, accepting a federal government job. He takes an oath to protect and defend the Constitution. He is subject to all the guidelines and rules set down by the Constitution. He has his job at the will of the people, not his own, and he is supposed to serve the interests of the people, not his own. His job does not put him above the law in any way whatsoever.

I admire her restraint in not responding “I think it’s impossible to predict just how brazenly, nakedly biased the conservative-majority Supreme Court actually is in 2024.”

@harrylippidardo

5 ай бұрын

Following the law is not "conservative" I guess with the way the left operates it is.

@GeorgeEugeneBarrett

5 ай бұрын

That qunt is the biased one here.

@nevadadesertrat267

5 ай бұрын

If you believed in the constitution or actually read it. You would be going after biden the fbi and the doj. You would have fit in well in 1930s Germany NDR

@josephrice29

5 ай бұрын

I don't like the guy but the government conveniently picks and choose what they want to prosecute all the time...... This is a vague legal Theory that has never been used, and there was no due process for insurrection.. even if there was a solid legal argument, tensions in the country are so high right now, intentionally keeping somebody off the ballot that 40% of people want to vote for is absolutely insane, in the match That Could set off the Civil War in this country....... and beside that, whatever legal jargon they want to say to give the appearance they are just following the law, it is clear with anybody who has half a brain that this is done to keep people from voting who they want to vote for, which is what they Dillon countries that are authoritarian

@levymoyer8391

5 ай бұрын

@@josephrice29 subverting democratic elections is another principle of authoritarian regimes. Which is exactly what Trump attempted to do in 2020 and will obviously do again if not properly censured here and given a second opportunity. This is an unprecedented legal dilemma. I agree with that. It does have an air of a story being written as it happens. But the only reason it feels that way is because it is novel and completely unprecedented. No one has ever attempted the crimes that were committed. You just have to ask yourself what’s going to happen the next time someone tries. You and I both know if this isn’t dealt with harshly there will absolutely be more attempts at autocratic installations around the corner. You can already see it in the words of other GOP members like Mike Johnson. The possibility for conflict exists, yes, but that theoretical outcome is less harrowing than letting an actual fascist regime take root. I think we’re in for a hard time either way but must do what’s necessary big picture and long term. Just my opinions.

If the Constitution grants states the right to administer elections, and Maine extends that authority to the Secretary of State, how can there be any question in this matter?

What a country you have America with the Red White and Blue when many of us in Europe see's everything leading up to Jan 6th and beyond in Black and White crystal clear.

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

Please cite a link backing up your claim.

the supreme court must act asap. no more shying away from this issue.

If we understand the Constitution then it basically states If anyone engages in an insurrection then they are disqualified. Explaining that if they aid, Influence or comfort those who practice that insurrection then they are disqualified regardless of conviction. Can we not clearly see that this was made so that no one can use the time that it takes for the Justice system to process that this person can become a dictator. He said in a speech telling them to March to the capital to stop the peaceful transfer of power, To stop a lawful proceeding. He told them that he would be with them so they felt they had a leader. He lied to them and told them that the election was stolen knowing that it was not. So no one can deny that he incited the initial riot. And the purpose of it was to stop an official proceeding. He even called out them by name saying "proud boys" stand by. And afterward he made a speech saying telling them that they are patriots therefore he gave them comfort. He also vowed that he would pardon them if becoming president again. So if any of us has ears to hear and wisdom to go with it then you cannot deny that he started it, supported it and told them that what they did was okay when it was not. As far as that 14th amendment goes he violated the constitutional oath. In that the government is not telling us who we can't Or can vote for. It is clear that we were never meant to vote for someone who was seeking to overthrow the United States or gain power by deception. That constitution was created to protect the people from a dictator or king like regime. Your aware it was created so that no one could take away the rights of the people. Now this man did that exactly therefore having him on the ballot is like putting Vladimir Putin's name on the ballot or any other dictator around the world. Be wise my fellow Americans!!!

@deborahmulkey1627

5 ай бұрын

Bravo. And what about offering to pardon the insurrectionists? And making a lovely choir of them to sing songs played at his rallies? Why doesn't anyone bring up the things you brought up or the above things?

Why not? This SCOTUS has trashed their credibility already. They have no respect left too lose.

@ardentynekent2099

5 ай бұрын

My thoughts too with caveat that it’s all on Trump and his minions.

@khammerly

5 ай бұрын

Democrats and republicans 9-0

@WyvernYT

5 ай бұрын

I'm afraid the case will play out that way. If nobody believes that the far-right Justices are not lying hypocrites now, why should they try to avoid publicly acting like lying hypocrites?

@rosex3271

5 ай бұрын

​@@khammerly So how much are you getting pay by Putin/Trumpty Dumbty/MAGA RepubliCONS to spread lies, disinformation, misinformation, conspiracy theories, propagandas, and etc.⁉️ 🤔😵🙄😩🤷🙅🤦

@rosex3271

5 ай бұрын

Do we really want MAGA SCOTUS to rule and highly possible in political favor of Trumpty Dumbty⁉️ 🤔😰😱😵🙄😩🤷🙅🤦🤮🤢🤬

Mrs. Bellows is an American hero. You can be proud of her. Trump DID incite an insurrection.

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

Says who?

@user-xr8dq6ly7g

5 ай бұрын

She ABSOLUTELY is an American hero and you are correct! Very courageous patriot! Love her! And history will too

@rtqii

5 ай бұрын

@@Reaper-cm4jr Colorado Supreme Court - "The trial began, as scheduled, on October 30. The evidentiary portion lasted five days, with closing arguments almost two weeks later, on November 15. During those two weeks, the Electors, the Secretary, President Trump, and CRSCC submitted proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The court issued its written final order on November 17, finding, by clear and convincing evidence, that the events of January 6 constituted an insurrection and President Trump engaged in that insurrection. "" -- 23SA300.pdf - Colorado Supreme Court

@Theonetruegod-hw2ei

5 ай бұрын

@@Reaper-cm4jreveryone 😂😂😂😂

@SandmanAlpha4

5 ай бұрын

He absolutely 100 % did. No ifs ands or buts about it. Guilty

At least we will all get (At some point) a good lesson on part of the Constitution !

@ardentynekent2099

5 ай бұрын

Quite a price to pay?

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

@@ardentynekent2099 Careful dude! You are not supposed to stray from the party line. The Colorado and Maine justices are entirely correct in their reasoning and their arguments are "persuasive", that's the word the party is currently working with.

Maine Secretary of State , before she made her decision, she had thoroughly analyzed the legal aspects of the case, from every angle, then she implemented the law. Trump , as usual, appealed.

Jessica and Anderson thrive together. John Dean is stupendously articulate and a national treasure. Great segment producers.

I like the answers given by the Secretary of State . She makes it clearly the FACTS OF THE MATTER .

Are legal scholars and judiciary are playing words games with the law?! Interpreting the constitution to serve their interests? Or rather the constitution to protect the rights of citizens?

@LuisGarcia-kh9up

5 ай бұрын

The interpretation will be used by both sides judges and the defendant lawyer and I believe it will come down to evidence in this case plenty off it and then in some cases jurors will decide the words games have been around for ever

@ardentynekent2099

5 ай бұрын

“I found the most clever loophole.” Nah, nah, nah!! It’s exhausting and infuriating.

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

@@LuisGarcia-kh9up Nah, the establishment simply hates Trump. They would never pull this on standard republicans or standard democrats.

@JosedeJezeus

5 ай бұрын

That’s what politicians are famous for: manipulating the jargon

How can they attack her. Shes acting with the constitution???

@lindarockafellow5058

5 ай бұрын

Ikr!

Oh no. They don’t want to? Too f***ing bad. This is a huge issue that needs an answer ASAP.

No more Trump

@Finn_MacCool

5 ай бұрын

You have no choice.

@b.t.40yrs_ago

5 ай бұрын

@@Finn_MacCool says who?

@user-kc7sf7xo7q

5 ай бұрын

No more Biden

@Mark_Brooks

5 ай бұрын

@@Finn_MacCool 91 felony counts, at least two fraud trials. DOJ conviction rate: 95%. Number of lawyers who have turned state's evidence in Georgia: 4.

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

"Let's Go Brandon"!!!!

Shenna - great girl! With you to stand against the mob crowds!

@lindarockafellow5058

5 ай бұрын

Smart strong woman! Constitution is everything for a democracy!

these people are making this complicated when it’s not complicated at all!!! it’s very simple, they are just picking every word apart to try and find a way to keep trump available as a candidate. total BS!

Be clear and simple: anyone who holds a civil, military, or ecclesiastical office is an officer!

- 14th Amendment, Section 3: No person shall... hold any office, civil or military, under the United States shall have engaged in insurrection... or given aid or comfort to the enemies. - Insurrection definition (Cambridge University): An organized attempt by a group of people to defeat their government and take control of their country, usually by violence. - Did Jan 6 was an attempt to take control of the government by violence to prevent transfer of power? YES - Did Trump participate, given aid or comfort to jan 6? YES Trump is disqualified

@reason6835

5 ай бұрын

I guess we can just ignore people’s right to due process then. 🙄

@heatherpayne1995

5 ай бұрын

​@@reason6835he gave aid and comfort to those who have already been convicted.

@reason6835

5 ай бұрын

@@heatherpayne1995: Nobody has been convicted of insurrection. And you’d still need to convict Trump of giving them aid and comfort if they had.

@moorefacts6605

5 ай бұрын

@@reason6835 yes we can ignore that because the Constution bypasses it.

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

OK. So post a link to the case where Trump was CONVICTED of ANYTHING. And if you are so sure, why not let it run it's course through The Supreme Court and PROVE that you are right?

It's all so very lovely. Seeing Democracy coming back to America. The stink is losing.

@DingleDangle66

5 ай бұрын

Can’t wait for you to be put in prison when Trump is in office.

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

Flowery jummyness jippie!!! The democracy is coming back! (nobody knows what this means but who cares) Juppie the puppies!

@377499

5 ай бұрын

@@Habib_Osman Americans know

The 14 makes no mention of trial or legislation, Prof Roth should know this.

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

Does the 1st mention Cell Phones, Email, Fax, Social Media, Text etc? So I guess you have no right to those either?

@reason6835

5 ай бұрын

Yes it does. It’s right there in section 1. It’s called the due process clause. You can’t deprive someone of their liberty without due process of law.

@rtqii

5 ай бұрын

@@reason6835 Poor Trumpy... None of his rights under the Constitution have been deprived.

@seabreezecoffeeroasters7994

5 ай бұрын

@@reason6835 Don't selectively quote sections of the constitution and call it done you just look like a fool!

@reason6835

5 ай бұрын

@@seabreezecoffeeroasters7994: You’re selectively IGNORING parts of it! Also known as “cherry picking.”

Likely true. Some of them prefer to spend their time on free trips and junkets provided them by uber rich conservatives.

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

So the Conservatives are paying for free trips for Kagen, Soto-Mayor and Brown-Jackson. WOW, I didn't know that.

@annebalderston2520

5 ай бұрын

Clarence does a lot of that.

@chashue6032

5 ай бұрын

@@annebalderston2520 Yes he does. But I think he will be "retiring" very soon as a result of it.

Lol. Just be accountable. That's what mature adults do

Get on with it already Lock Him/it up.

We all have things at work we don't want to do but we do them anyway. But what I think it comes down to is two things. A. They don't want to upset the right wingers that put them in power, especially their donors B. They don't want to be caught on the wrong side of history and they are still trying to decide what side that will be.

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

So do you include Kagen, Soto-Mayor and Brown-Jackson in that?

@LXNL

5 ай бұрын

@@Reaper-cm4jr as a collective, the body is in right wing majority. When you have a school project, you don't get graded individually. Jack Smith asked a simple question and they don't even want to answer that. Do the job so that the nation can move forward from all this.

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

@@LXNL No, Jack Smith tried to do an End Run around the Legal Process and The Supreme Court shot him down.

@LXNL

5 ай бұрын

@@Reaper-cm4jr not much of an end run if the end result is it coming back to you for you to decide anyway, now is it.

@LXNL

5 ай бұрын

@@kissmyaxe531 if that's what helps you get by, sure. Entitled you are.

Is it me or has the dude "Jedi-tricked" a quarter of America into thinking he's not only innocent, but also fit to lead, competent and absolutely awesome?

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

Eh.. hate to bring it my dude but its you. So, close CNN and venture out into the world. This place is holding your mind captive.

Bravo!! Thanks Jena Griswold for doing the right thing and standing up to Trump. Appreciated!!!!

Taking opponents off the ballot is perfectly normal and definitely not cheating.

@lindarockafellow5058

5 ай бұрын

Especially when it's constitutional!

@Buttsy1

5 ай бұрын

@@lindarockafellow5058 Framing someone for an insurrection is definitely not constitutional.

@InAMinMaths

5 ай бұрын

Cheating is saying an election was rigged

@harrylippidardo

5 ай бұрын

@@InAMinMaths 2020 was totally on the up and up. Said no critical thinker ever.

The 14th Amendment contains within itself the constitutional remedy for Trump's disqualification issue. Let his buddies in congress finally get their chance to take care of it. By a two thirds vote in both houses an insurrectionist may run for office.

Trump For Prison 2024!

@Finn_MacCool

5 ай бұрын

Trump will be your god-emperor and all you can do is rage.

@AmyNewman

5 ай бұрын

@@Finn_MacCoolThat beta male doesn’t even sleep in the same bed as his wife.

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

Biden/Fetterman 2024---It's A No Brainer!!!!

@SandmanAlpha4

5 ай бұрын

I fully support this message

@michelled8408

5 ай бұрын

​@@Reaper-cm4jrwell drumpf has no brain so .

Term limits, minimum age, and natural-born citizen restrictions do not need enabling legislation! This is no different!

For all those that say he should be allowed to run, remember that even if he loses , he will NEVER CONCEDE. He did that in 2020, and will do that again! When are you gonna learn?

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

Nothing happened. There was a riot. Boohoo. France experiences 10x more violent riots year in year out. It was definitely new for the very safe and calm US collective memory though. And.. if we disregard the riot, Trump kept on fighting in courts. Lost all those courtcases. Really really shocking stuff for sure.

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

It's actually insane to me how twisted the minds of many americans are. A boob on TV is completely abhorrent and shocking, while bombing a 1000 times weaker and desperately impoverished nation with horrific poison (depleted uranium) is.. kinda whatever right? Not that shocking to most americans. Permanently poisoning the land and bombing others is kinda OK as long as its far away from home is kind of the logic I guess. Very interesting stuff. And then the guy that is the ONLY anti-war candidate gets treated like Satan himself. I think one needs to be american to understand this. The power of rational thinking cannot match this level of stupidity.

@deborahmulkey1627

5 ай бұрын

Learn what? I think all who are paying attention know that. That doesn't mean he should still be on ballots. That doesn't mean we should give up.

Why can’t they just accept what the constitution says?We do‼️It’s written simple & executed by it on word’s ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️

If you privately want to let a ruling stand. Just refuse to hear the case.

Stand strong Maine and keep up the great work to inspire other states to do the right thing. He should never be given the opportunity to run for anything.

VOTE BLUE

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

Why? Because The Southern Border is working out so well and you want "Four More Years" of that?

@smileysun9212

5 ай бұрын

Vote blue if you want to be a 🫏 that kisses 🫏. . Once a 🫏 always a stupid dumb 🫏. Im surprised Democrats won’t change their mascot but it fits them quit well. Now don’t get me started on Rump. The problem with America is both parties are at fault for not working together for we the people. It dosen’t matter which party comes with a great idea to help this country, the other party automatically goes against it.

The only question to ask... is what will be the Supreme Court decision... they will ben over backward to find a way NOT to block Trump from the ballot... :---(

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

Hmm.. I've heard no serious judicial scholar say that. In my understanding the big question is whether it will be a 9-0 decision or if one (or more!) judges will rule in favour of Colorado and Maine's courts. LTE is a harvard politicology expert (and hardcore partisan Democrat) and he is currently leaning in the 9-0 direction.

@Sjb2077

5 ай бұрын

All the Supreme Court has to do to save Jinny Thomas’s Trump is to dig up some twisted legal reason to indirectly let Trump off the hook. Money talks.

I'M WITH YOU MRS. BELLOWS 💯% I MUST SAY IT IS COMFORTING TO SEE A CONGRESSWOMAN! DO HER JOB TO THE LETTER! YOU ARE AWSOME MADAM SECRETARY!!!!!😃👍

If Scotus will skip, that means the lady from Maine is much more courageous than those limp males.

Did the founding fathers make Amendment 14:3 difficult to understand? And how it should have been written🦅.

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

NO, but apparently the 5th Amendment is written in Sanskrit, at least as far as The democRAT's are concerned.

@annakingry9157

5 ай бұрын

It definitely disqualifies Trump.

@suomynona4607

5 ай бұрын

@@Reaper-cm4jr Where are the exact words that cover the political action of disqualification in the 5th amendment? It doesn't say it in the English version, you seem to think it will when translated into Sanskrit. Despite what some MAGA mental patients believe, being disqualified does not deprive anyone of life, liberty or property. Fifth Amendment No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Thank goodness she is doing her job. Yesssss

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

Saying what she is paid to say. Not straying from the party line.. great woman for sure. Doing precisely what we hired her for.

Anderson are you suggesting that the President is not an officer of the USA?

@JoeNarbaiz

5 ай бұрын

The President is the chief executive OFFICER of the United States.

What would happen if the supreme Court declines to hear Trump's case😢

The Supreme Court is no where near equal to this moment.

Unfortunately we all don’t get to do only the things we want to do.

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

You definitely used some words. Made a sentence.

@nancyb.9759

5 ай бұрын

@@Habib_Osmanwhat are you trying to say ?

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

@@nancyb.9759 Oh I just meant it was such a .. I don't know the right word for it. "Ethereal" message? A messageless message basically. So I as a half joke half critique made a messageless message too.

@nancyb.9759

5 ай бұрын

@@Habib_Osmanthat is cool. I was trying to say that the Supreme Court gets to handle what they do and do not want to handle, while we the people have to regularly do what we perhaps don’t want to do- the show was saying that the Supreme Court may not ‘want’ to take up the case- ugh- I am sure that some of the members would rather go on an elaborate fishing trip with their federalist ‘friends’. By the way, I am known for being ethereal 😂( really!)

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

@@nancyb.9759 Really? wow. That's a beautiful poetic quality to have. I wish I wasn't as confronting and brash. And the supreme court has literal 100% sovereignty right.. They simply cannot be pushed or pulled at all, weird that such an important decision would be delayed for so long. Especially because it is a 6-3 republican court! Seems like it would really benefit them to clear Trumps name right away.. but they choose not to. Almost mysterious don't you think? Would the GOP have some secret benefit to blocking Trump.. could that be it.. maybe the GOP hopes this (in)action somehow disqualifies Trump, which would allow them to finally push forward their dream candidate: Nikki Haley. GOP would dance on the table. MAGA would cry a river lol Because I think none of the judges are populist right.. Nah, don't think so. All GOP supreme court justices are Nikki Haley type GOP guys probably. Do you know whether one of them is isolationist + populist + nationist? (in other words MAGA).

Section 3 of the 14th amendment talks about “insurrection or rebellion against the US”, not just insurrection.

I'm sure they don't want to face it, but face it they must! It would also behoove them NOT to make the wrong decision, and put ALL Politics aside.. The Laws and the Constitution are very clear, and as they claim to be the most astute in such things, the manipulation of said Laws and Constitution will affect them as well... Remembering that they too are Judges, and not immune to the Dictatorship of another trump Presidency, and the Maga insanity... Additionally, they must support the safety of Judges and Citizens around the Country, from the serious threats around America... This has gotten utterly out of hand!!!!! 😡😡😡😡

No kidding they don't want to deal with it. they take heat from both sides no matter what. They are hoping that everything can be stalled and then it wont be an issue they have to get into.

@aaronmcintosh2903

5 ай бұрын

The very use of the word "stalled" insinuates a pause, ergo, it would at some point again be an issue that would need to be dealt with..."they" will still be the same Justices. So....stalling gets them what?

@TheACcam

5 ай бұрын

@@aaronmcintosh2903 If certain things are paused long enough, those things may take care of themselves in a way where people who don't want to deal with them no longer have to because their own involvement is a moot point at that later time period. Let's pretend I am the deciding vote for the entire country of the USA on the matter of whether Trump should be removed from any and every ballot. I don't want to decide this. It's never been an issue before, I don't want the legacy of being the person who screwed this up, and either way I choose I will be told by millions that I have destroyed democracy forever. If I say that for (insert vague reasons) I will not render my judgment on the matter until 2026, what is the outcome in the context of what I have just mentioned?

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

SCOTUS will definitely be pressured by the GOP/MAGA party to rule as quickly as possible, to cover this partisan judicial loophole and the dems will try to influence their decision because even dem scholars say the chance Colorado/Maine's decisions are upheld is so tiny, it might as well not be there.

Donald Skunk.

@moorefacts6605

5 ай бұрын

Good one! Mind if I borrow it?

@Mark_Brooks

5 ай бұрын

Danger Yam.@@moorefacts6605

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

Joseph Robinette Briben

@LynnEdwards-sl7jd

5 ай бұрын

Corn Pop

@moorefacts6605

5 ай бұрын

@@LynnEdwards-sl7jd Donald Skunk is unerring. The other descripts are just hyperbole.

Running for office is a privilege, not a right. There are laws and limitations to that privilege. Obviously, abusing the privileges eliminates that opportunity to utilize the privileges.

When are these bought and paid for justice's going to face their own JUSTICE

It's pretty simple. If you rule in a way trump doesn't like you are biased, if you rule how he wants you are unbiased. Since we know this is how he works, simply stop listening to anything he says.

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

What a simplistic and self-serving analysis. You do not expect this to be persuasive do you?

@Habib_Osman

5 ай бұрын

That type of reasoning makes me think of dumb fantasy creatures. Like an Orc. Almost something an Orc would say. "Me no like bad guy, always talk lies. No more listen to bad guy now!" Something like that.

@jd190d

5 ай бұрын

@@Habib_Osman Have you ever heard trump say a ruling that did not work in his favor was fair? I await your reply with an example.

@jd190d

5 ай бұрын

@@Habib_Osman Trump is like a pathetic Orc.

We love Shenna, Save America Democracy

With regard to the issues in question, what would any morally rational, sentient person conclude. Does anyone really think that section 3 of the 14th Amendment applies to every elected official except the President, despite his oath of office and that he was only elected by the people to serve for 4 years before his job review...which he failed.

Well done

either way trump lost already, thank god!

@Socrates21stCentury

5 ай бұрын

You wish ... Trump 2024!

SCOTUS will rule in favor of Trump. The far left will cry foul again when that happens.😂😂😂

What diaper don is throwing at the wall isn't anything I'd care to be around.

Why wouldn't they want to face this issue? It is simple reading. Read the constitution, NO he is disqualified. Very simple. It doesn't matter if he is charged with insurrection or not. He has offered aid and comfort to those who have. He made an oath to preserve, protect, and defend, the Constitution. Yet he openly says he wants to suspend it and be a dictator. What bothers me most is the number of people that would be good with that.

It is people like this lady who gives me a glimmer of hope. 😊

@Reaper-cm4jr

5 ай бұрын

Why because she has attempted to remove the Front Runner who is running against her party?

@ursulasoames8602

5 ай бұрын

No ! It’s because he’s a Traitor ! And a criminal and rapist too ….btw. 👍🤡 ⚖️⚖️⚖️💪

I am not a Trump Supporter, I do believe that each state has the right to not allow or remove a person from a ballot only if they are FOUND GUILTY of a VIOLATION of the US Consutution either by a court of law or the US Supreme Court makes a final ruling, then and only then should the State be allowed to not allow or remove a person from the ballot.

@annakingry9157

5 ай бұрын

So you think the right to vote has to go to court before each citizen can vote? Every declaration of war has to go to court? The Constitution is the law. It doesn't have to be upheld in a court opinion before it's considered a law.

@patrickward8050

5 ай бұрын

@@annakingry9157The constitution is the law, however the states do not have the discretionary power to interpret the way in which the constitution is applied. That power is reserved for the federal government. Which is why both Colorado and Maine are waiting for the Supreme Courts ruling.

@suomynona4607

5 ай бұрын

Do you believe a trial would be required to find that Obama can't hold a 3rd term? How about one to determine if a 12-year-old can become President? Or a Canadian? The Constitution is as clear that they are just as disqualified as someone that engaged in insurrection.

@annebalderston2520

5 ай бұрын

What about the fact that SCOTUS majority are corrupt supporters of Trump?

2:15 Brilliant how she calls him "Mr." Trump. I'm doing that now too.

Yes. Trump and his base will definitely read a 34 page opinion….you’d be lucky to get them to read it if you made it into a picture book.

The Supreme's have to make a decision. You can't accuse someone of a crime and extract a penalty without due process.

@Mark_Brooks

5 ай бұрын

No hearing or trial needed for disqualification. Already done and on appeal.

@roseserrano7047

5 ай бұрын

You found ridiculous

@roseserrano7047

5 ай бұрын

Sound

@KC73

5 ай бұрын

Read the 14 th amendment to the Constitution.

@michaelmurphy6195

5 ай бұрын

@@Mark_Brooks In what country can you arbitrarily accuse someone of a crime, and extract a penalty without due process? That's right, a communist country. Nothing in our constitution allows that including the 14th amendment, That's why due process is the first section of the 14th. Grow a neuron, or drink more koolaid!

The Constitution refers to the President as "Commander-in-Chief." By any reasonable interpretation that is an "officer."

Wow, what a Secretary!

She is upholding Constitutional Law. 7:23 Of course the GOP disagrees. They believe they are above the law.

they arguably have constitutional obligation to settle questions relating to the president events that occurred during said presidency

The issue of unraveling legalese is a common one, but also common is the sense that any government official should be excluded from running if he or she has engaged in insurrection. Office holder, not office holder… An insurrectionist shouldn’t be president.

Recuse herself perhaps Justice Thomas, Brett & Amy should Recuse themselves so no bias decision could be made .. smh

This is worse than watergate ….said John dean