Imagine how awkward it would've been if we heard a gunshot 4 seconds later.

@roddydykes7053

24 күн бұрын

At this stage I don’t know if he’d give a shit

*"I invited your guests to leave."*

@3hutp

18 күн бұрын

It's an interesting example of a contradiction in speech actually

@maicoxmauler2825

17 күн бұрын

They're in Canada now

@JacquesMesrine94

14 күн бұрын

​@@maicoxmauler2825Canada ? No. Belize ? Absolutely.

2:00 i feel like jesse reminded mike of nacho here, and this was maybe the start of mike realising that jesse wasnt just a worthless junkie

@leiperfamily7707

Ай бұрын

Hey that’s pretty good

@shhhake

Ай бұрын

i never thought about the blindfold thing til now... hmm

@yungniodred

Ай бұрын

except when this was written, none of the bcs stuff existed

@ionrsm

Ай бұрын

@@yungniodred of course not, but in the canon timeline those events would have happened before this scene. of course they didn’t literally write this scene with nacho in mind, but after the addition of the bcs timeline we can add retroactive analysis to these scenes from breaking bad. extra layers

@anthonykublawi

29 күн бұрын

I don’t know if this was the start, he immediately asks Gus if he could kill him right after

This was the moment when Jesse became increasingly incautious

I like how at 0:22 mike tossing the bed sheet into a scene change

Mike already sees Nacho in Jeese and wants to prevent him from meeting the same fate

@spiralsage

Ай бұрын

Nacho was way more pragmatic than Jesse Jesse, regardless of how much empathy he mightve had, was stupid irrational and emotional. A person you would heavily avoid doing crime with

@davidemelia6296

Ай бұрын

No he didn't, you schmuck. BCS was only written BECAUSE BB was such a smash hit. He didn't write any part of BCS beforehand.

@Logan912

24 күн бұрын

⁠@@spiralsageTrue, but I think Mike could’ve been seeing just enough similar traits between Jesse and Nacho that it at least reminded him. Of course, BCS and Nacho’s story weren’t written until later, but that’s beside the point. lol

@windmillin-in-the-dirt2489

17 күн бұрын

The actors had no clue Nacho even existed in this timeline…….what you talking about??

@Barrythebarnabas

11 күн бұрын

@windmillin-in-the-dirt2489 Nacho and Lalo were BOTH mentioned in season 2 of breaking bad. Did you even watch the show?

It’s funny how Gus and Mike had experience with someone like Jesse with Nacho from years before BB.

Lol Jesse's first thought was him worried about Mike if he was hurt

Gals death changed that man.

That thumbnail 💀

The only moment i see mike speechless 😂

@SangreFriasBack

18 күн бұрын

Nacho’s dad left him speechless

@darksideofevil13

14 күн бұрын

And Walter when he made it clear they were about to kill Gale.

If I was Jesse I’d be thanking mike and asking him to get that thing off my floor

I don’t remember this scene at all lol 😂

I love the way Mike and his crew treat rubbish activities. Jesse is not a good partner to sell dope with. A dealer that gets high on his own product. The law enforcers will connect the dots

Been awhile since I heard the word “incausious”

As I get older I’m channeling season 4 Pinkman more and more. Next stage is Ehrmantraut.

@Hurrishane03

21 күн бұрын

He went from a junkie dopehead to a competent and capable criminal agent

1:47

Why didn’t Mike close the window?

that would be your mother

Can we stop this Jesse/Nacho comparisons, before the fact. Like yall know theres NO way mike saw Nacho in Jesse, technically. Like chill, yo.

@Logan912

24 күн бұрын

Obviously not when Breaking Bad was being written, but Jesse does retroactively have *some* similar traits to Nacho. It’s not that big of a stretch.

@jamesfrancese6091

21 күн бұрын

It doesn’t seem unreasonable to draw parallels between Nacho and Jesse, whether from Mike’s point of view or our own. Mike’s own son Matty (who also wasn’t an established backstory character within BB), Nacho, Jesse are all clearly instances of young men whose waywardness is a result of corruption, rather than inner malice - a distinction Mike understands all too well. Mike finds corruption painful to witness not only because he couldn’t save Matty from it, but because he himself has a played a role in this destructive and evil process. There’s technically no need to retroactively apply information that didn’t exist (to your point) in order to appreciate a common theme which is being deliberately explored by the writers of both shows. But then again, why not? We are already suspending external standards of belief in the very act of accepting that the person on screen is in fact not even a man named Michael Erhmantraut, but an actor named Jonathan Banks wouldn’t you agree? In other words we’re assessing not just a work of fiction but a fictional viewpoint being constructed therein - and yes there are plenty of healthy debates on how to handle that

Unbelievable... When Jesse figured out he'd been robbed and didn't give a single fucк, I was like wtf is wrong with him... Then Mike gets it back and he STILL doesn't give any single fucк... Then, at the end, he still manages to find a way to waste his 5 millions... Not talking about his fkn Santa Claus spree, wasting 10k bundles by the car window... If only he realized all that money could bring him all the useless junkies he wanted for company, or all the Janes and Andreas he ever wanted...

@nothingdos

13 күн бұрын

Walt’s alt account