Credits for Video Corrections 1)Mark of Distinction I was one of the engineers that helped develop the infrared sensor in the nose of the missile, and was the responsible project engineer for about 80% of the sensors produced. This video was well done and quite accurate. I can say that its a 66x66 Mercury-Cadmium-Telluride long wavelength sensor. The long wavelength allows it to not only see in the dark, but also through smoke and fog. 2)Andrei Casiadi 2:16 You didn't mention about it's short battery life, and it can operate in seeking mode for about 2 minutes, then it has to cool off. Also the thermal imaging is only 64x64 pixels so it can be fool by something other heat source. I heard it can be fooled by aerosol smoke. It's also not very easeful in the city fight. Looks like the tank has to have 2nd layer of dynamic cover or active armor protection system. But it's a very dangerous weapon for the older tanks and if used in right hands at right time. 3)elkski Utah 2:00 very good animation.. you called them fins , some call them wings. they were originally called strakes and the rear were fins. Diameter to 5.6" from the original 5? I think 5.6 is the carbon tube diameter 4)Jonas Ingi Ragnarsson- I think the missile diameter is 127 mm. 5)MM= milimeter thanks to Myles Willis. (Changing to new Voice Over Artist) 6)Jorell Dye The whole assembly may be $250,000, but the missiles are $78,000 (Source: Pentagon 2021 budget report) 7) Colonel Terry Rowe, US Amy, Retired I was the Test Officer for 85% of the Service Test of the TOW Antitank Missile System at Ft Benning GA 1977-79 ( another officer had to complete the test because I had volunteered for a second tour in Vietnam). It was apparent that the TOW was a revolutionary improvement over the current 106mm Recoilless Rifle which was ineffective against a moving tank beyond 500 meters. It was clear to me that antitank missiles would eventually neutralize the overwhelming advantage of tanks on the battlefield (I had previously served with a US mechanized Infantry unit in Germany on the Czech border and we knew we were vulnerable to attack by the Soviet 5th Tank Guards Army). The light years improvement of the Javelin over the TOW takes my breath away in so many aspects! Incidentally, the TOW missile was considered very expensive at that time at $2,000 per! At the time I was also the Test Officer for mortar systems and I had the "crazy" idea we should develop mortar round that on a small parachute (used for illumination rounds) with an infrared source could attack tanks at their thin top armor. Nobody would listen. Anyway, a great explanation of the Javelin! Colonel Terry Rowe, US Amy, Retired. P.S Military Technology Data are a little tough to get our hands on and also classified and most of them are in a very grey area, but we will try our best as average Engineers and 3d Animators to bring out the best in a very Minimalistic or Simple Explanation. We take full responsibility for our mistakes.

@everready2903

Жыл бұрын

Also at the end you say it's a game changer on the modem battlefield. It's very impressive obviously but hasn't changed the war in Ukraine.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

@Сергей Захаров I heard they had sent Defected javelin. That is why it did not work

@beastboy3581

Жыл бұрын

2+2=4

@zhoubaidinh403

Жыл бұрын

Much appreciated!

@tempo5366

Жыл бұрын

@Сергей Захаров I have never heard of an active war which showed one side holding back their supposedly superior weapons for half a year to safe them for later. T-90s are being used and destroyed just like all the other tanks. There is no Russian armada waiting for the right moment to strike, while their comrades have such serious trouble on the battlefield. It’s been eight months now, face reality.

I was one of the engineers that helped develop the infrared sensor in the nose of the missile, and was the responsible project engineer for about 80% of the sensors produced. This video was well done and quite accurate.

@user-zp4fp4hy8e

Жыл бұрын

if this is true, then write more information about it, but I doubt that you were an engineer

@markofdistinction6094

Жыл бұрын

I have to be careful not to reveal classified information about operational details ... I have no interest in going to prison. I can say that its a 66x66 Mercury-Cadmium-Telluride long wavelength sensor. The long wavelength allows it to not only see in the dark, but also through smoke and fog.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

@@markofdistinction6094 Good One ! Will Put your Comment in the Credit List. Elon Musk tweet read, “Science is discovering the essential truths about what exists in the Universe, engineering is about creating things that never existed Thank you for your Service! We respect every engineers especially those who are Self Made.

@ShawnGS300

Жыл бұрын

@@markofdistinction6094 Well, you just proved yourself. Now we know that you weren't just the maintenance guy taking out the trash in the room while they were developing this system and got an ear full.

@Random4Logic

Жыл бұрын

because there was so much said about the sensor in this video xDD All the content was basically "the sensor and controll unit aim the rocket at the target" - the end

Regarding 4:06, the metal liner at the front of the Shaped Charge is a cone usually made of copper. The cone shape forms a hollow cavity at the front end of the high explosive charge. The cone shape is there to achieve the Monroe Effect by which the blast energy of the high explosive charge becomes focused for concentrated penetration through the point of contact of the target. A shaped charge works like an explosive lens.

@romaniangypsy3640

Жыл бұрын

Focused explosiin

@christopherleubner6633

Жыл бұрын

They also have tantalum cones for the second charge in some variants. Same deal except heavier and much higher melting point for better penetration power.

@OtrebPH

Жыл бұрын

concentrated boom boom

@biddobrahmin8643

Жыл бұрын

Its not copper... a Tungsten cone is used

@alouisschafer7212

Жыл бұрын

An explosive lense puts it well into layman's terms and explains why you can punch trough tanks with not a huge explosive charge: All the energy is focused.

I think it's great that you're putting these types of videos out. I actually got my own javelin just a few days ago and I've been meaning to try it out but it's just so complicated you know, so it's great that you post these types of tutorial so that the average person can also learn how to use one.

@chocho6766

Жыл бұрын

i learn firing javeline from cod

@gclarke1236

Жыл бұрын

😂😂😂😂

@charmate661

Жыл бұрын

u mean to say u got javelin that costs 250,000$ and u don't have any better source to how to use it than youtube video?

@iceveinz8730

Жыл бұрын

@@charmate661 yeah 👍

@aSSGoblin1488

Жыл бұрын

probly ukranian soldier find this helpful

I was the Test Officer for 85% of the Service Test of the TOW Antitank Missile System at Ft Benning GA 1977-79 ( another officer had to complete the test because I had volunteered for a second tour in Vietnam). It was apparent that the TOW was a revolutionary improvement over the current 106mm Recoilless Rifle which was ineffective against a moving tank beyond 500 meters. It was clear to me that antitank missiles would eventually neutralize the overwhelming advantage of tanks on the battlefield (I had previously served with a US mechanized Infantry unit in Germany on the Czech border and we knew we were vulnerable to attack by the Soviet 5th Tank Guards Army). The light years improvement of the Javelin over the TOW takes my breath away in so many aspects! Incidentally, the TOW missile was considered very expensive at that time at $2,000 per! At the time I was also the Test Officer for mortar systems and I had the "crazy" idea we should develop mortar round that on a small parachute (used for illumination rounds) with an infrared source could attack tanks at their thin top armor. Nobody would listen. Anyway, a great explanation of the Javelin! Colonel Terry Rowe, US Amy, Retired.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thank you for the great information Will Put this as a note input Comment Section. Thank you for your Service Colonel Terry Rowe.

@thePronto

Жыл бұрын

You did a second tour of Vietnam in 1979? I bet you were warmly welcomed...

@OidSoldier

Жыл бұрын

@@thePronto Thanks for making me aware of my error. Those dates should read 1967-69,

@thePronto

Жыл бұрын

@@OidSoldier TOW was a great AT weapon. Great job.

@professionalfire3902

Жыл бұрын

The Swedish STRIX mortar projectile actually uses an infrared sensor to top-attack armored vehicles. It's supposed to pair with their Mjolner mortar turret, which is basically a double-barrel semi-auto loaded mortar turret they install into their CV90 vehicles.

Thanks for javelins! A really good weapon

Wow, this video has convinced me! I have ordered my Javelin missile kit right now!

"Atleast we have an autolo-" *mississippi queen starts*

Well illustrated and explained Javelin defense system.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Will always remain Humbled for your Support!

Infantry still runs the show!!

@qasimmir7117

Жыл бұрын

As they always have and always will.

Thanks , it was very useful! They just forgot to include the user manual for mine.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

;) good one

2:06 great tutorial! Now i know how to use this at my backyard..

Damn this is great content. Excellent explanations and animations.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks will try to do better

Damn this is great content, Excellent explanations and animations

- How a Javelin Missile works? - Very good! 🙂🙂🙂

@testingmysoup5678

11 ай бұрын

They work by charging the us taxpayer 700k per missiles when they cost like 1% of that

Wow! What an animation! One of the underrated channels. All the best for your effort guys. Keep going

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks man for your kind words 🙏

Never knew so much Engineering in One Missile.GREAT WORK

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thank You

Russian tank leaves the chat

@shootingsportstransparency7461

Жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣

@matttim5095

Жыл бұрын

Russia is doing just fine. With way fewer troops vs Ukraine that is getting help from all of nato. Russia is using 10 percent of its military too

@victor070

Жыл бұрын

Russian tank's turret leaves the earth lol

@breadboi1248

Жыл бұрын

@@matttim5095 love these proppaganda comments

@Definitely_the_best

Жыл бұрын

@@matttim5095 Look's like other 90% is T-62 and lower grade metal scrap what russians call : " none-analogy in the world " .

Heard that they are making a new version of the missile with a new targeting system, specifically designed for Ukraine. This version’s targeting sensor can detect vodka breath coming out of the tank’s ventilation system and lock on it to deliver the payload.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

😁

@Goldenbee9

Жыл бұрын

thanks, I laughed until my stomach hurt))) the javelin is really good at targeting Russian pigs, I checked it personally))

@Lvov_Aleksandr

Жыл бұрын

По себе других не судят... 😌

@feszty

Жыл бұрын

@@Lvov_Aleksandr I'm not an alcoholic, like the average fck russian.

@Manyakuss0

Жыл бұрын

Quite dangerous. Too big probability of friendly fire

Really underrated channel, keep up the amazing work!

@Aitelly

2 жыл бұрын

❤️ Thanks 🙏

@massudddecat7449

Жыл бұрын

those ukrainianmobsters ukraineflorida drkMarket $250K 1/4 Million per Missile Selling what we Give them For Free To mideast Terrorist&drugcartel countries Such As the 300 plus BulletProof Vests that Disappeared that we u.s. Gave them ukrainemobsters

@mazlanattan5031

Жыл бұрын

Lan

@mazlanattan5031

Жыл бұрын

Lan

Wow, I really like your work,I’m very impressed, I wish you success mate

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks Mate .We love Engineering content so thought of making one for ourselves as well as others.

@tupolev.designs

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly honestly, I am not surprised, engineering is is fascinating, it has done several things we thought were impossible, and when we go through what is behind this, it's interesting

Well Crafted Animation

1:28 that kv1 is about to have the surprise of a life time

Excellent video. Thanks

I hope this channel gets the attention it deserves, its just good content that not enough people see. I wish you guys good luck

@Aitelly

2 жыл бұрын

Thank You So much for the Support. We will try to improve as much as Possible. Stay tune as we bring you the F18 Super hornet & F35 B jet in the coming months. Thanks Again!

@massudddecat7449

Жыл бұрын

those ukrainianmobsters ukraineflorida drkMarket $250K 1/4 Million per Missile Selling what we Give them For Free To mideast Terrorist&drugcartel countries Such As the 300 plus BulletProof Vests that Disappeared that we u.s. Gave them ukrainemobsters

love your content. well done. great graphics and very thorough explanations.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

🙏 thanks for your kind words 🙏

Amazing information love this channel

THIS IS A GREAT CHANNEL. THUMBS UP AND KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Grateful for your kind words 🙏 Will be releasing next 10 days a new Content. Stay tuned 🙂

amazing work, I'll advertise you on tiktok 👍

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thank You. Humbled by your support. Awesome

Meu sonho de consumo é lançar o Javellin , nestes carros com som automotivo !

Not the tutorial we want, but the one we need.

Very informative.

Very important details: the CLU's thermal sight is a line scan camera, basically a line of pixels getting scanned across the scene rapidly. The seeker on the missile however, is not a linescan camera, but instead a starring array sensor. It has the same imaging principle as a modern visible light camera. I believe the pixel count on the seeker is either 64*64 or 80*80, and is faster than 60 Hz; still have to dig up the files

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the Info Will put your comment on the Important Note list 👍

@goranjosic

Жыл бұрын

I am also interested in the framerate of the sensor in the missile head. It is probably over 60 fps (but it is usually a military secret) The US has always banned IR thermal sensors operating at more than 9 fps. I'm into programming and electronics as a hobby, and for civilian use, it's very hard (legally impossible) to get a decent IR sensor with long range and decent fps in the west. All thermal cameras work at 7 to 9 fps or if they have higher fps, then they are of poor quality and cannot see beyond 7 to 10 meters. I deliberately mentioned "IR thermal" sensors, so that no one would confuse them with Near IR (near infrared) sensors, which are easily available and cheap.

@alexwang007

Жыл бұрын

@@goranjosic that makes the two of us! I'm located in Canada and it is equally hard to get these sensors/cameraa, how ever if you wanted to get an uncooled microbolometer one for projects i could help out :) I have been collecting them for the past decade... good job on clarifying the wavelength of these sensors! For other nerds or soon to be nerds, the *rough* range of detectable wavelengths are listed as follow: "Normal" cameras: 400-800nm Intensified night vision: 500-1100nm Laser range finders: 905nm (pulsed semiconductor), 1024nm (pulsed Nd:YAG or YVO4), 1550nm (pulsed erbium) Laser guided missiles: 1024nm or 1550nm (1550nm lasers are modern and are undetectable by night vision goggles which make them extremely deadly) Javelin and most heat seekers (cooled quantum detectors): 3000-5000nm Thermal scopes (uncooled microbolometers): 7000-14000nm

@alexwang007

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly thank you for making an effort to spread knowledge! I will try and find the actual source so that I'm not spreading false or inaccurate information 😁

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

@@alexwang007 Please do .Let us know the right data. Eagerly waiting

Your content are getting better and better 👍

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Glad you think so! we need all the Support we can get!

Thanks for your support!

Great explanation

This channel is definition of underrated.

@Aitelly

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks Bro

The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

🙃🤔😉

@lapisque

Жыл бұрын

AI!

@ronalddavis

Жыл бұрын

whos on first?

@esra_erimez

Ай бұрын

You beat me to it. Well done.

Find this channel unexpectedly and subs instantly. Hope to have good contents

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Truly Humbled by your Comment .Thanks a Ton again

Well done video. Keep improving your content and the success will most certinly come. You got yourself a new subscriber

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Truly Humbled and thank you for your Support. Means a lot o a Small Channel.

@ben-gm4ij

Жыл бұрын

Congratulations! When I came back and saw this video had a million views and your channel had grown so much it truly made my whole day. That hard work payed off!! Stay humble and keep up the great work!

I really like that you demonstrate battle-head work on russian tanks models. Nicce job!

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

New Meta Play Thankyou for the Support

@fukingmagnets

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly @5:15 is that a KV-1?

@SeedmancChitOKun

6 ай бұрын

only good against ww2-era tanks, touche

Amazing video & analysis ... 💯

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Appreciate it!

great video! can you create a video about Stugna?

When you want to say mm unit just say millimeter or mils. Nobody says emem. Good video.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

;) We messed up there. New Voice Over coming this month.

@grahamlucas2712

Жыл бұрын

@Miles Willis can I call you MW? Everyone in the civilized world that use the universal Metric system of measurements knows what mm means as a unit of dimention measurement. It is only the United States and some English speaking countries that refuse to use the KPS measurements. PS I am Australian and learned physics from an American book that did use the Metric measurements. It is just that the USA is so backward in not using it. By the way mils is a volume measurement being 1 mm cubed. Not the same as a linear mm.

very good animation.. you called them fins , some call them wings. they were originally called strakes and the rear were fins. Did they change the missile diameter to 5.6" from the original 5? I think 5.6 is the carbon tube diameter

@Aitelly

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the Feedback this is really Informative will Look into it .

@jonasingiragnarsson2512

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly I think the missile diameter is 127 mm.

@elkskiutah8204

Жыл бұрын

@@jonasingiragnarsson2512 yes 127mm is exactly 5 inches. only reason to change it from this original size would be larger warheads or rocket motor. But the Army always complains about its weight.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

@@elkskiutah8204 thanks for the information. 🙏 Will keep on producing more honest research content. 👍

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

@@jonasingiragnarsson2512 and elkski Utah Hope you don't mind as we have given Credit to your Correction and pin it in the Comment Section .

Great work! Thank you!

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Glad you liked it! Better Content coming Soon.

KZread put this in my recommendations and I didn’t know I needed it

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

:) We have been hopingfor months for KZread Recommendation Hope it's not Annoying anyone as this is mostly a different genre of Contents. Thanks for Support

"It uses Infrared seeking guidance" Conventional Flare Decoy: How did you know im going to work against it?

😎Now that I've completed the video, I'm now a certified Javelin Operator. 😎😎

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

haha Good one. We are in Awe of these Engineers who made them

@Miliradian

Жыл бұрын

But for only once...

@romaroman4370

Жыл бұрын

LOLRF

By your videos I learned how the stinger works, and now I am learning the javelin.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Next we are making the SwitchBlade Drone used in Ukraine

@DonetskBall

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly ho-ho! Nice😃 And I was preparing to draw then animate a NLAW. Already watched your video about HIMARS👍🏻 Greetings from Ukraine! upd: keep ahead! You do great work

Thanks

Very well made video. Basically no tanks in the World can survive a Javelin

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Almost every Russian tanks. But the British and US are also developing Anti tank Missiles like the Trophy to Counter MANPADS

Why is an expensive and difficult-to-process molybdenum alloy used for the precursor liner instead of inexpensive copper?

It would be nice if the animation showed how the shaped charges work in detail.

Amazing

Nice 👍

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thank you! Cheers!

Real engineering just made a vid abt this lol

@Aitelly

2 жыл бұрын

If you look at the Stinger Missile Content at the end of the Video we had already planned to produced 1 month Ago before Real Engineering. It is what it is for a small channel it takes 1 month to produce Good 3D Contents from Scratch.

@Willon

2 жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly i was accusing you of copying lol i know how long it takes i honestly prefer this vid

@Willon

2 жыл бұрын

Wasnt**!,!!

@Aitelly

2 жыл бұрын

@@Willon hahah Thanks Man but we do take inspiration from Mustard Real Engineering Found and Expalined etc.

New subscriber. Learn a lot from your videos. Can you do a video on AMRAAM, sidewinder and ASRAAM?

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Noted!

You didn't mention about it's short battery life, and it can operate in seeking mode for about 2 minutes, then it has to cool off. Also the thermal imaging is only 64x64 pixels so it can be fool by something other heat source. I heard it can be fooled by aerosol smoke. It's also not very easeful in the city fight. Looks like the tank has to have 2nd layer of dynamic cover or active armor protection system. But it's a very dangerous weapon for the older tanks and if used in right hands at right time.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the feedback.we miss that. We are learning from comments right now. Will do better with New content.

@Andrey222ful

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly I don't know if I'm responding to a bot reply, but the problem with all the news and other technical information (this video clip is included) is that it's taken only from couple sources especially from loyal side. Which leads to present incorrect information.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

@Andrei Casiadi I'm not a bot :) We just have to reply to a lot of Comments . Pin your Comment as we find it Neutral and Valuable. New Channel so Hustling as we move along. But we take your Feedback Seriously. We are not always Right. Yes Honestly We collect a lot of Data from different Sources.

@b213videoz

Жыл бұрын

Field tests in Ukraine showed that it's good NOT just for "very old tanks", Andrei 😁 And by looks of it that's you who appears on the "bot side"

@DOI_ARTS

Жыл бұрын

Can't use it in urban warfare because it needs about 2 seconds to arm the missile, it primarily has to be used from a distance since its a tank killer, I saw one video in Ukraine where a soldier use it in a tank about 50 meters inside a town (it didnt detonate and not a scratch on the russian tank)

that missile marks the end of tanks without "active" amour defense; an incredible weapon

@Goldenbee9

Жыл бұрын

I can say that as a regular user of javelins and nlavs, active armor does not save from these systems, javelin, tow, nlaw and Ukrainian stugna, Russian tanks burn with 100% probability, even a T90 breakthrough with the newest active armor system burns like firewood

@BladeRunner2021_

Жыл бұрын

I can say that as a regular user of javelins and nlavs, active armor does not save from these systems, javelin, tow, nlaw and Russian stugna, Ukranian tanks burn with 100% probability, even a M1A2 breakthrough with the newest active armor system burns like firewood

@qasimmir7117

Жыл бұрын

No it doesn’t. Just because tanks can be killed doesn’t make them obsolete. Lots of other battlefield assets can be killed but they are still used. Ask yourself how an army is supposed launch a full scale attack without tanks as a spearhead? What other battlefield asset can engage the enemy as quickly with as much heavy firepower as a tank? What other weapon system has as much firepower on a mobile platform? Time and time again when military technology moves on, ‘experts’ declare that tanks are obsolete as the battleship, yet somehow they keep coming back into relevancy. Make no mistake, tanks are an important component of the combined arms manoeuvre of the modern battlefield.

@pwnmeisterage

10 ай бұрын

$250K per shot is a hard limit. NATO was dismayed that Ukraine would "waste" so many Javelins against APCs, trucks, and other light vehicles - and then the Javelins they were supplying suddenly dried out.

Great rocket launcher! I got a quad feed using this. 🔥

Thank u

кв 1 явно такого не ожидал)

@mixasd8440

Жыл бұрын

Может автор хотел сказать что это оружие может бить только по траектории которую он высчитывает

@user-fl9su9eb5c

Жыл бұрын

@@mixasd8440 высчитывает траекторию автор(он)... двойная подстава для несчастного кв

POV: You're a Russian solder watching the tutorial on how to use Javelin after captured some of it.

@walabid2319

Жыл бұрын

Indeed lol

@Just_A_Random_Desk

Жыл бұрын

this seems to be aging rather poorly

Holly Javelins!! ❤❤

Amazing explanation… keep making such videos

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thank you, I will to increase our quality as we move forward. Stay tune as we move to Russian Military engineering.

There was a legend, that Stallin was afraid of Javelins, that can potentialy destroy t34 and kv1

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

😂Good One

@Brian-qj4kk

Жыл бұрын

Keep dreaming 🤣

@34Realist

Жыл бұрын

No fear, german guns killed 40 000 T-34 in this time

@dryan8377

Жыл бұрын

@@34Realist And they still lost.

@34Realist

Жыл бұрын

@@dryan8377 against the world, Not Russia

love this channel i want to see the guns on a ww2 battle ship please

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the Support. 🙏

Can you make a video about A10 worthhog....how it works....which weapons it vmcarries.....etc ?

I would like to know, where does it hit in top attack mode. In video it seemed to hit the turret front or side armor instead of weak top armor. What is the angle of dive and does it choose the highest point of tank or what?

Спасибо, что учите как из них стрелять. А то уже запасы переполнены. Хоть избы топи джавелинами 🤣

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Спасибо, что учите как из них стрелять. А то уже запасы переполнены. Хоть избы топи джавелинами Translation from Serbian to English (Thank you for learning how to shoot from them. And the stocks are already overflowing. At least the huts are swamped with javelins)

@alekseysamoylenko3259

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly This is russian language, but writing by Ukrainian.

@yaroslavv6624

Жыл бұрын

Жареною бурятиною переповнені українські ліси

@American97percent

Жыл бұрын

You need to watch other channels in order to learn how to live among people in a human way.

SUBSCRIBE Please !

@animation1858

Жыл бұрын

👍done hope your channel grows

Late but great video as always. Can i also get the ost you guys used in this video?

Awesome video

This was the animation i was looking for especially during defence of Kyiv

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

@KingIjazMalik

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly Nice Work

Very timely video. The Russians and Chinese have just come into possession of many unused Javelins and were wondering how they worked.

@AMBEE-sp2ev

Жыл бұрын

They got their hands on empty launch tubes with no missiles.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

YES!

@American97percent

Жыл бұрын

You are right, we need to find a use for it. In the USSR, we had candy wrappers from chewing gum. We played with them in a certain way to stick to the palm. With launch tubes, you need to come up with something the same. Probably as legs for a table to use in palaces for the oligarchs.

The awkwardness of the narrator constantly saying “fire” the missile” when we actual use the phrase “launch the missile” during live simulations. It was ingrained by our instructor to use the phrase “launch” instead of “fire” to avoid confusion between a successful launch or the system caught itself on fire.

Love this!

Now they are teaching us about missiles !!!

Great video 👍🏼 Thank you! If I reckon right, metal thickness should be 60 - 80 mm, not 600 - 800 mm penetration.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Well the document say like that. If it is battle tested i think it be might working. But there are also people saying it is not Working In Ukraine.

@jask7908

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly You are probably right then. It’s just astonishing it can penetrate 2 ft. thick metal.

@grahamlucas2712

Жыл бұрын

Jas K. You obviously have no idea how a shaped charge works. Extreme heat cuts through thick steel.

@SeedmancChitOKun

Жыл бұрын

@@grahamlucas2712 yet jet fuel can't melt steel beams.

@grahamlucas2712

Жыл бұрын

@@SeedmancChitOKun Who ever suggested jet fuel penetrates tank armour? Only you. The shaped charge of an anti tank missile uses metallic compounds that burn through steel. Keep your conspiracy theories tinfoil hat on. It will protect you from reality.

i wonder why the reactive armour cannot blow away the initial charge and the rest of the rocket

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Good point. We meant to show it in slow motion but we're too lazy to animate the reactive armour.

@alexcalibasi7028

Жыл бұрын

cuz its uranium powder

@chaos.....

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly same

You’re an amazing channel, i can’t believe i just discovered you, you’re clean, and a perfect explainer

All of that in 4k quality 👍

There is also a T-90 tank, which is a Russian tank

I wish to see the day that a Javelin is used against T-34s or KV-1s

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

I wsih to see the Day it is ued against T-14 Armata tank.Russia Latest tank.

@solareclipse9379

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly keep dreaming bruh

@solareclipse9379

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly keep dreaming bruh

@Brian-qj4kk

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly keep dreaming kiddo

@john-.-doe

Жыл бұрын

T-62 have been deployed already, so, let's wait a bit for T-55, and then T-34.

Found your channel today, 10 videos in 😅

Great animations. But please do add more details. Explaining too much in too little time. Go deeper into each part and mention all the details. I don't think people care much about the 4k quality rather the amount of details the video has. Great video anyways! Appreciate it!

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Yes your right.we had increased our content time to 12mins. F35 jet we had just made.

Дякуємо. Джавелини допомагають нам, українцям, захищати свою Країну від російського окупанта і терориста. Разом до перемоги! God bless America 🇺🇸 and Ukraine 🇺🇦

Удивительно как совершенствуются военные технологии.

@user-mc6rf7do7z

Жыл бұрын

Передовые технологии всегда первыми появляются именно у военных

@American97percent

Жыл бұрын

@@user-mc6rf7do7z ошибочное убеждение. в спорте, авиации, но сначала ученые и инженеры должны создать новое что б потом оно было в чем то применено.

@_Serj-

Жыл бұрын

@@user-mc6rf7do7z на заході технології на сході дибіли на яких приміняють технології.

Random fun facts about the javellin system. The soft prelaunch system is similar to tge airbag inflator in a car. Sometimes it will fail to ignite the main rocket motor giving a bit of a scare but no worries it wont arm unless a minimum G and distance from the CLU is detected. The CLU is powered by a battery with a small argon cylinder in it the argon cools the sensor and the battery is just that. The missile itself also has an argon tank that is activated once the first trigger is pulled enabling lock- use it or lose it. You have about 3 minutes to launch, plenty of time. The second trigger actually launches it. Once it has lock and launch is sucessful, it is 100% gonna hit the target unless something intercepts it physically, they are a very confident system. 🤓

@user-tu4gl4yh7f

Жыл бұрын

Javelin has many weaknesses and its effectiveness is much lower than cornet, tou or stugna. if you want, we can discuss it.

@SirLoinBeefsteak

6 ай бұрын

Learn English first

شكرا لصاحب القناة .. اتمنى تعمل مقارنه بين منظومه صواريخ ثاد ومنظومه اس ٤٠٠ ومن الافضل

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

نعم سنفعل THAAD و S400 لكن تذكر أنه يتعين علينا إجراء الكثير من الأبحاث والتحدث إلى الكثير من الأشخاص قبل إنشاء المحتوى. من النمذجة إلى التزوير إلى الرسوم المتحركة إلى العرض Yes we will Do THAAD and S400 But remember we have to do a lot of reseach and speak to a lot of peope before Making a Content. From Modeling to Rigging to Animation to Rendering

@abbasabd3536

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly Thank you

$250,000 for one missle might seem like a lot but if it takes out a 10 million tank then its worth.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

👍 Yes ! The commercial are spot on . thanks for the Support 🙏

I still don’t understand one thing through, if the precursor charge has to make a contact against the reactive explosive armor to detonate, wouldn’t that cause the explosive armor to react and explode? Would that explosion not damage the rest of the javelin missile and cause it to fail? How does the javelin survive this explosion long enough to activate the main warhead? Thanks

@massudddecat7449

Жыл бұрын

those ukrainianmobsters ukraineflorida drkMarket $250K 1/4 Million per Missile Selling what we Give them For Free To mideast Terrorist&drugcartel countries Such As the 300 plus BulletProof Vests that Disappeared that we u.s. Gave them ukrainemobsters

@massudddecat7449

Жыл бұрын

doodooIt Magick

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Good Question. Yes that's the trick the Javelin wants the reactive amour to explode for the second stage of Explosive to do it's job and passed though the armour of the Tank

@venator5

Жыл бұрын

With about 60% failire rate.

Fano, you need this one !!

Educational

I wonder how many Russian tank drivers smashed that like button!?!

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

🤔

wow it cost a lot more than i thought it would

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Yup

Cool weapon on the earth.

merci

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

🙏👍🙏merci

Also watch the Jet used in Top Gun F/A 18 Super Hornet. kzread.info/dash/bejne/naGYmpSFeqXYhLA.html Kindly Subscribe to help our Small Channel Grow.

@josephpacchetti5997

Жыл бұрын

You Got It. 👍

@user-er8tr9kt8l

Жыл бұрын

Your 3D models are not that good you have to put your Logo on every spot. Fact.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

@@user-er8tr9kt8l 😀 thanks for the negative feedback 🍺 Everyday is an Improvement for us 🙂

@user-er8tr9kt8l

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly np

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

@@user-er8tr9kt8l Learning as we move along.