He used to be way more outspoken - just watch his videos about the problem's of today's action and horror movies. Now he's so PC. He gives every movie a participation award, no criticism at all. It just is what it is...

@jaykimmerman8608

2 ай бұрын

He has become so PC that now he always sounds like an NPC.

@marlondavis9450

2 ай бұрын

He’s been that way for awhile. When I read your criticism I felt bad because that’s what I was doing with him, giving him a break because he’s a nice guy know damn well he exhibits shill behavior.

@mesicek7

2 ай бұрын

@@alienboy1322 ??

@alienboy1322

2 ай бұрын

@mesicek7 "PC" I suppose you're one of those weirdos that get their underwear in a twist over "political correctness" Oh, the horror. Not to anyone who works 9 to 5, live their life, and don't give a rat's buttocks.

Stuckman is a John Rocha/John Campea/Grace Randolph wannabe 😅

Perfectly stated. He´s not wrong in certain aspects. But to lay all the blame at the studios or exec´s feet is just a far too easy way out.

@bruceleeds7988

2 ай бұрын

not all chris' points about studio interference pertain to Madame Webb, he was speaking in general about how execs can ruin movies. Madame Webb should have NEVER been made. it should have never gotten thumbs up in a boardroom. the only purpose of it's existence is to keep the Spider Man IP.

@LeviAckerman-cb5ji

2 ай бұрын

@@bruceleeds7988 But he tends to hold directors completely blameless in these projects. As an aspiring director, he is afraid to burn bridges.

@zeroskaterz92

2 ай бұрын

@@bruceleeds7988 What a horse shit. You literally just parroting the same shit: blaming the studio ONLY.

@chomosuke0720

2 ай бұрын

​@@bruceleeds7988Who pitched the concept though? The execs? It's the creative's job to make the thing good. Are you saying just because it was greenlit, it means that they now have no responsibility to at least make it watchable?

The other issue is that Chris attacking the studios will not be well received and he wants to become a full filmmaker. He is shottibg his own foot

@mattmark94

2 ай бұрын

yeah he made both sides angry

You dislike Chris for being wrong very frequently and simping for his potentially future employers. I dislike Chris because he's as boring as watching paint dry. We are not the same.

@TheRealLoomar

2 ай бұрын

He does seem to struggle to sound passionate about media, despite the fact that's the thing he claims to be the most passionate about

@happynihilist2573

2 ай бұрын

@@TheRealLoomar what I've seen form him makes me wonder if his scrips are AI generated, the thing is AI would probably be more coherent then his scripts

@TheRealLoomar

2 ай бұрын

@happynihilist2573 I don't think it's that, I think he just tries to make his reviews as simple as possible in case he says something that could be viewed as mean towards another creator Still can't explain his monotone delivery of his reviews however

@simulateandtrade

2 ай бұрын

How is he boring?

@user-xx6vy9ri8p

2 ай бұрын

​@@simulateandtrade He says nothing about the movies except for the most surface level info that you can read on IMDB description.

My problem with his new "I dont want to criticize and make anyone feel bad because people probably worked hard on this" is I doubt he applies that logic anywhere else, because it truly can apply in almost any context involving a service or good to some extent. Your point was perfect: the studio can impose ideas and requirements, but the talent bringing it to life is an entirely different thing. Its clear there was a lot of studio interference, but also a lot of lack of talent/care on the crew side of things. Dakota Johnson was here for a paycheck and theres nothing wrong with that in theory, so long as you still try. She didnt. For more proof of that outside the film itself, compare any interview of hers for this movie to any of Sydney Sweenys. If anything, she got way more shortchanged in the end but you can tell she was excited coming into the role.

Stuckman got on my last nerves when he did the Cowboy Bebop netflix review. He's just full of it now.

@nyssaalghul-queen08

2 ай бұрын

Same. I unsubscribe too after that. I used too like alot of his videos and now he doesnt seem genuine to me anymore

@onsokumaru4663

2 ай бұрын

He's a low-key shill, trying to lick ass up his way into the industry.

@SK-qu4wo

2 ай бұрын

The last straw for me was when he blocked me from leaving negative comments on his channel. He is such a weirdo.

You wait Chris stuckman is going to lose his mind when they hate his movie

@user-be7tc2bd6e

2 ай бұрын

Correct,when his film is critized no one will be polite or gentle,just will say their opinion.

@charlieherbst4623

20 күн бұрын

He had or has his short films on his channel. They're very cringe-worthy. Gonna have to agree it won't be great.

I will criticize movies but not certain ones that people make I’m cool with.

Stuckmann can't give even give a honest opinion positive or negative on film's anymore even his fans are starting to calling him out

Chris Stuckmann fell into the fallacy of division. What is true of the whole, with the studio meddling to give a terrible product, is not necessarily true of all component parts where the acting, directing, and choreography are terrible. And this is why reviewers that dissect every scene, and every minute of screen time will give a far better technical review than a 10-minute general review of the film. And that's not to say a 10-minute general review is worthless. By no means, but a 10-minute general review shouldn't be discounting or rebuking those reviewers who go the extra mile to tear a film apart in all of its aspects when appropriate.

@TheRealLoomar

2 ай бұрын

I used to really like Stuckmann years ago, he seemed to really enjoy digging in to a movie and seeing everything in it, good and bad, functional and broken However over the past few years it seems like he's trying to be as inoffensive as possible because he wants to get into the media industry As such his reviews now are usually just explaining what the plot is about and then saying a few things he liked about it while staring into the camera with a deadpan expression and a monotone voice. His best of 2023 video is one of the most depressing things I've seen in a while

@noneed4me2n7

2 ай бұрын

I enjoyed his early content also and noticed the change. I get why but it screams not authentic and to get a job in the industry. I’m also not one for excusing incompetence. Id prefer someone else with actual talent have a go at it, but sadly it’s super gatekept by nepotism and cronyism.

I missed the part where the studios forced these poor directors to take all of that money and put their name on these projects.

I used to like stuckman, but for a while now, he's just become a shill.

@Peremptor

2 ай бұрын

Dude was always just looking to sell out asap.

@jonathancurran6851

2 ай бұрын

Yeah whatever lol

@jonathancurran6851

2 ай бұрын

​@@PeremptorThis is my United States Of Whatever!

@leadsin99er

2 ай бұрын

Stuckman has been taking notes from Kevin Smith on how to turn on fans.

@user-xx6vy9ri8p

2 ай бұрын

For a decade at least.

Valid points, but the studio is the ones hiring absurdly unqualified people to make the movies in the first place. Matt Sazama and Burk Sharpless have proven...MULTIPLE times...that they have absolutely no ability to write a good script. Yet Sony hired them even after the disaster of Morbius. Then they hired S.J. Clarkson to direct even though she had never directed a feature film before. Why are they hiring unqualified people? Because they will roll over and do whatever the studio tells them to. You aren't going to hire Chris Nolan then try and turn the movie into a giant Pepsi commercial or try and change entire plot lines of the movie with ADR in post-production. They are hiring puppets to do what they want. These people had no chance to make a good movie even without interference.

Chris with his elaborated word salad when he could only resume everything said with "dont ask questions and be excited by new product..." like Jay Baumsn said years ago 😅

Off topic but the Joss Whedon thing that guy did it to him self and more.

@1701EarlGrey

2 ай бұрын

no he didn't - as long as he can deliver a good film I don't care if he is good persona o not

@tylerbertram7065

2 ай бұрын

People hated working with Alfred Hitchcock and Stanley Kubrick they still had careers.

@isaiahbrown8929

2 ай бұрын

@@1701EarlGrey TF ig u think Justice League was good movie lol.

So despite all of these years doing his thing, Stuckmann still doesn't understand the inner workings of the studios he wants to cuddle up to and be a nice guy towards. Most people would probably look up how long the script had been worked on before a video like this, but it seems he just found the strikes to be an opportune scapegoat. It does seem a far more likely thought process that the villain was going to be crushed before a producer or someone else stepped in and said "Okay, but what if we insert X-product..." instead of assuming "the villain has to be crushed by a Pepsi product". If that was his attempt to absolve the screenwriters, he still hasn't mastered his simpin game...

@TheRealLoomar

2 ай бұрын

Yeah it just kinda baffled me that he's blaming the executives for things like bad takes and choreography

@romelmunoz7957

2 ай бұрын

I assume the strikes did too damaged the Morbius box office...

@zionquinbar1563

2 ай бұрын

This argument makes zero sense. He made a whole video insinuating he believes Madame Webb being as bad as it was is on Sony but he you also think he’s trying to be buddies with big Studios?

He’s become weird , wtf happened to him?

@colindowden2182

2 ай бұрын

He's a shill, nothing more nothing less.

@r3dr4te963

2 ай бұрын

I feel he begin to act like this after he begin making his own movie (Dunno it's done or not, never knew the update)

@jntnprrs2978

2 ай бұрын

He grew up and realised all this negativity on the internet is just tiring

@chomosuke0720

2 ай бұрын

​@@jntnprrs2978Or he regressed and refuses to give the creatives any flak when it's literally their job to make good movies, ironically infantilizing them and removing all agency and accountability.

Someone didn't tell Stuckmann, those were not Hershey bars in the pool. Eat Hearty, Chris.

This is all the result of how much we sacralize creative engagement and media consumption these days. When the default mindset of most people is to treat media consumption as some kind of sacred engagement with the creator, it's only a matter of time before there are calls to self-police criticism.

And if Chris doesn’t stop calling himself a critic, he has no right to call himself a critic anymore

I think the superhero genre is incredibly boring because it's gotten to the point where the stakes are so high, that they can't really get any higher, and because when you have multiple universes that means there are actually no stakes, because anything that happens you can just say "well that was in a different universe" so why bother seeing the movie if you can just undo anything in the next one? Also they pander to a new audience by alienating the currently existing one, not even knowing if the new audience even exists.

Chris Stuckmann is a sell out

I think what Chris fails to connect the dots on, in his haste to throw Sony Pictures under the bus, is that if everything he says is correct about the studio interference and meddling, then all the better to be able to critique and call it out publicly! Whether its from a writing perspective, from a characterization perspective, etc. all are clearly valid issues with the film, and better yet, since the directors cast and crew didn't make these decisions on their own accord (if we truly believe the studio is at fault), then they can rest easy in the fact that none of the mistakes in the film are the fault of them, nor a reflection of their true talents. Sure they could be understandably frustrated that their attempts to make a great film were curbed by executive meddling but ultimately that's the studios problem and they'll have to take a bath on the film when it inevitably flops at the box office. Instead its better that they simply focus on their next film and take to heart what the critics said, so that maybe next time an executive comes to them with one of their "brilliant ideas" they have the experience from the previous time to use and push back with. They'll be able to point to videos of the scathing criticisms they received and say, "consider this for a moment, this was the reaction the last time this pitch was given for the direction of a film and audiences and critics HATED it!" But they can't do that Chris if you are unwilling to criticize the crap sludge that is modern day movie entertainment!

@InspireCreate43

2 ай бұрын

That's what I'm saying and aside from that, isn't the entertainment value of his channel going to plummet with *only* positive reviews? That's like watching a movie where the characters have no conflict and just have a happy time for 90 minutes. Literally nobody would be interested in that long term...

The Studios hired the wrong directors and the wrong writers most of the time.

Not only is Stuckmann sucking up to those studios now, by not being honest and forthcoming with his opinions, but he’s laying out a nice fluffy bed of victimhood to fall into - if by chance he doesn’t have *100%* percent control of his coming films. 🙄 We already know he will blame if people say his films suck. 😏 The best of both worlds. 😒🤦🏻‍♂️

@marlondavis9450

2 ай бұрын

Damn, hit the nail on the head

@marlondavis9450

2 ай бұрын

I remember YMS use to plug his music & the end of his videos & people told him it sucked, so obviously he stopped doing it. Same with Ralphthemoviemaker, he made a movie, people said it sucked & now he doesn’t talk about making movies anymore. Chris is heading in that path whether he knows or not.

@jntnprrs2978

2 ай бұрын

"sucking up to those studios"? Did you not watch that video which was just about calling out studios?

I think he’s just scared to offend filmmakers now that he is one which I get but at the same time he needs to remember that the reason he’s popular is because of his hilariocity reviews that critique bad films honestly

2:37 The critics that Chris Stuckmann has rebuked have been making this exact point for years now!

Well what he is doing is - self initiating himself into the CLUB because he thinks he is the next Tarantino with his movie coming out. So he is trying to not make enemies as he moves into the Hollywood inside crowd. Meanwhile he is so far from being “In” that he will realize what a fool he is making of himself. Hollywood won’t give a shit and now his audience is leaving. We shall see what happens when his movie ever comes out. I promise you this is all happening only because he is worried about his movie. This move could have just ruined any chance he had.

Still love stuckman but he's changed so much since he started making his own and maybe he has just grown-up and has different views

Yeah, but you see how your video title says, “ I need to talk about this…” and there’s a picture of a watermelon and a sous chef? Well, I mean that can be misleading too. Fortified Triscuit Farm.

Well, the studios' system is a problem. But, there's talented people (directors, writers, etc) who can make good/great/masterpieces inside that system.

@JohnM0rris

2 ай бұрын

If the studios let them

@luchomscyfy

2 ай бұрын

@@JohnM0rris that's the thing. You have to be smarter. Or.....you can't do the movie and let your name being dragged in the mud.

@ipmk6313

2 ай бұрын

I look at the Spiderverse movies as a potential example of this. ITSV probably didnt have many Sony exec eyes on it because it was under the radar, it was a sleeper no one expected to be good, let alone amazing. The first Sony produced Spider-Man movie since TASM2 and its about Miles Morales, who wasnt well liked at that point, and its animated, AND the same year as Infinity War? No one saw it coming. But I gotta assume Lord and Miller had eyes all over them for BTSV. But theyre mad talented so they were either A. able to work around whatever Sony threw at them, or B, similar to what Greta Gerwig and Margot Robbie did to Mattel for Barbie, they knew what good ideas where worth fighting for and how to fight for them.

Don't you know? "From above, the wicked shall receive their just reward"

You want Chris Stockman is going to lose his mind when they trash his movie

If chris truly holds this perspective then he should apologize to everyone involved with dragon ball evolution because his opinion should now be that everyone who worked on that movie actually tryed thier best and were trying to adapt the story well and they wanted to direct it different amd wanted the acting to be good but the studio just didnt let them and his video is still the first thing that comes up when you look up dragon ball evolution review so he still profits from a review that he claims is not what he dose or is about if thats true delete it

The interview where the director is talking about how many edits and takes there were in the movie, and Dakota Johnson is just squirming in her seat, is a site to behold.

@letsgobrandon1906

2 ай бұрын

What can I search to find this specific interview

lets be real. if sony didnt partner with marvel tom hollands spiderman wouldnt be as big as he is. as much as it was their decision it was probably bc their last live action spiderman movies flopped. the spiderverse franchise is the way it is bc of the writers and directors and animators and sony letting them breath. i dont think its the same to compare an animated movie to a live action movie.

Lol, you're being a little too generous to Sony here. If you release a Spider-Man villain movie with only a hint of the wall crawler even being associated, you're already taking a HUGE chance. 1st time directors are in a predicament. If a director receives a crappy script that was approved by the production company, then Chris was 100% right about a 1st time director having no choice but to deal with the hand that they're dealt. The scriptwriters, or storytellers, per se, do carry some of the blame. Chris was very candid, after his own film production was greenlit, that he wasn't going to trash bad movies anymore. Those subscribers that didn't like that, should've left then. It is safe to say that if Chris doesn't review a specific movie, he either hasn't seen it, or it's not good. Not rocket science.

tell that to zods snapped neck !

So you're telling me Studios don't care about their products, when they're in the business of making money from movies that makes no complete sense. I'm sure Studios care about the products that they're putting out.

I would argue that it is the studios fault for hiring people based on gender, race and ESG score rather than skill.

I'm sorry but it's way more simple than everyone is saying.. it's made for teenage to adolescent girls...iv got one of each and neither will ever give two shits about these movie's aimed towards them, and boy's honestly would prefer male led superheroes they don't tend to go out of they're way too watch movie's aimed at women.. woman will watch comic book movie's the way they used to be if they're boyfriend asks them to go to the cinema but not enough dude's want this and woman couldn't care less.

@user-yq9im9dk9z

2 ай бұрын

Okay, so previously women watched MCU movies with their boyfriends which increased the percentage of the women audience in their datasheets. They saw that and ruined the movies by making them for women. Clearly statistics are shit and a useless field for movies when they can't predict and analyze why and how...

Chris just became the very religion he despised and abandoned

A spec script is a unstudioafied script... he's saying no fresh ideas get to studios Probably becuase his scripts dont get read

He stopped reviewing "bad movies" about a year ago to be out of the "corporate critic system" and "hate on things KZread algorithm" and only make videos he cares about versus all other critics make videos or articles just based on expectations of them or $ and bowing to the algorithm that loves when people hate. Him not reviewing the movie means he "in his mind" is not selling his soul to viewers' expectations and is a form of quiet quitting, but in his hardcore viewers opinion gained him tons of credibility. If he can no longer be considered a critic anymore he is fine by that as he doesn't care to feed algorithms to maintain a label.

@DuhDundies

2 ай бұрын

It’s been about 2 1/2 years since he stopped becoming a “critic”.

@chomosuke0720

2 ай бұрын

Yet he made a video about Madame Web with a blatantly clickbait thumbnail and headline that made people think he was back, probably for the view guarantee of whatever ad he was spewing on that video. I thought he only made videos about movies that are clearly good and that he likes? He clearly doesn't care anymore and it's sad. This is why Jeremy Jahns is the GOAT.

I don't know why Stuckmann can't incorporate his blame of Sony, valid or not, into an actual review that simply acknowledges the movie is shit; after all, if the movie wasn't shit, there'd be no blame to assign in the first place. Without this crap film, there'd be no subject for this video. Somehow, Stuckmann's gone from reviewing movies to reviewing studios, and it's as much a case of supposition as opinion. It's not even a case of Stuckmann choosing "not to be negative"; it's just a case of his choosing who/what to be negative about. He's not really taking "the high road", he just has more sympathy for some people in the movie business than others.

Couldn’t agree more…..been done with this guy for years…this is his apex of bullshit

Does Chris know for sure that it is 100% the studio's fault? What if it's actually the creatives? What if it's both? This approach here with just blaming the studio is rather black and white, naive and counterproductive. Really, I feel like the best approach is actually talking about the movie itself. Stuff that is actually defined and you can reference. Highlight what worked and what didn't. That way you can inform the creatives AND the studio that their product is bad and that signals to them that change is required.

Chris: i won't telll you about my madam web review But i will mention my indy movie i want hollywood to make 😂

I disagree with you here. You really think that the director and crew are just left on set to get on with it? A film like this will have studio executives involved constantly. From the get go this film has been forced through many changes. The scenes u mention with Dakota talking to them in the car, they most likely shot that one way, the script gets changed and they had to reshoot it a different way, then in the edit it’s just a mix match of shit. Happens all the time with these big films. I don’t particularly rate many of the actors in this film but I guarantee they had no idea what was going on day to day either so I’m reluctant to blame them. Whole thing is a shit show and a waste time and money

He’s gonna get a first grade education about making a movie because he thinks that he’s gonna make a really good horror film. It could suck it could very well suck and I’m not a big fan footage genre anyway.

The blame is ALL on the studio. Madame Webb cannot be made WITHOUT SPIDERMAN!! That idea alone was stupid. Madame Webb is not interesting if she is not simply a teacher of Parker's. The studio said "let's make an IP keeper and grace whoever is gullible enough to appreciate this golden oppportunity" No one could have made that movie competent, let alone good.

@willdegra317

2 ай бұрын

This isn’t really true. I didn’t know Guardians of the Galaxy and thought the idea was horrible. James Gunn makes good stuff and they’re now one of my favorites. There was no need to ride coattails of iron man. Likewise with Madame Web, no one knows her, the popularity doesn’t make the movie, the writing does.

@hwoarangthedoorbell

2 ай бұрын

The studios are to blame for cheaping out on the writing and directing, sure, but the creative failures of this movie are also on writers Matt Sazama and Burk Sharpless (Morbius, Gods of Egypt, Dracula Untold) and TV director SJ Clarkson. Stuckmann acts like if Sony had only let them cook, it would be a masterpiece, but their output really doesn’t suggest that. And it’s not like Sony’s on set telling Clarkson to make sure Dakota Johnson and Sydney Sweeney are giving the worst takes possible. It’s ridiculous to say it’s all on the studio.

Unfollowed him around 2 years ago when I noticed he went out of his way to ONLY say positive things about films

M-SHE- CHRIS STUCKUPMAN

If the DCEU has taught me anything, it’s always the studio’s fault. But a movie’s story is always up to the writer and director. I can’t blame Cathy Yan for the direction of the acting in the Harley Quinn movie. But I can blame Ellen Jay Basco for giving a nonexistent performance. I could blame Christina Hodson for terrible writing in the script. And I could blame Margot Robbie for cramming herself into what was supposed to be a Birds of Prey movie and turning it into a vanity project. Just because idiots said her Harley Quinn was great, when it wasn’t.

Nice video man

Yeah I'm sorry but this trope of Poor Innocent Creative whose work is destroyed by Big Bad Corporation needs to die at this point. I mean yeah sure it does happen, for example; I am big Terry Gilliam fan and he could fwite entire book series about it. But reality is that some people have to have oversight to actually produce good things (Zack Snider is good example of someone who went off the rails the moment he didn't have other ppl looking over his shoulder) and for Marvel, we now know for sure that their stories started to go south the moment Feige was able to get rid of their Creative Committee. BIg issue is that Marvel in particular brought in a lot of writers and directors with little to no experience handling such big projects - and yeah like it or not some of them were more interested in using those movies as a platform with actually telling decent story. Madame Web for one has been pushed around for over a decade as a Glass Celling Project whose premise started and ended by being female centric movies. Which, sure, nothign wrong with it in of itself but it's not enough.

@TheRealLoomar

2 ай бұрын

I really don't understand why over the past 4 years the MCU just seems to be bringing people in to work on these multi million dollar projects despite having a portfolio about as deep as a droplet

@zionquinbar1563

2 ай бұрын

Lol I am sorry but this argument is just stupid. Also why are we trying to act like Sony doesn’t have a history of overstepping when it comes to there movies in particular there Spider-Man movies. Even with Spider-Man 3 and well established filmmaker like Sam Raimi they made him put in Venom as a villain even though he made it clear to them he didn’t really like Venom. Or with Marc Webb and Amazing Spider-Man 2 it was originally supposed to be more so of a romantic comedy with Spider-Man even bringing in MJ but Sonys focus was to set up there own little cinematic universe rather than just making a good movie

@jankostrhun8725

2 ай бұрын

@@TheRealLoomar The part of it is imho the controll it gives them. The director who has just a couple of small time projects will be too over their head and has no clout to push back- and unlikely to leave because of them. Part of it is chasing trends but that was more of a Lucas Films domain. I think it was ME who said that Marvel isn't hiring directors, they're casting them. And writers were always... well same people who worked on Web worked on Morbius and you can find writers who are circling relatively big projects for decades despite rarely producing anything financially successful, let alone good. Dunno if it's union thing or just personal connections but you can see people going from flop to flop and happily keep producing garbage.

Stuckmans reviews are like watching paint dry.

@jntnprrs2978

2 ай бұрын

So you're one of those who like to watch mindless ranting and cringey clickbait videos?

@voodoochile333

2 ай бұрын

@@jntnprrs2978 yes. Rather than the usual stuckman crap "the film was directed by John Smith, John Smith made googley eyes in 2015, I really enjoyed the cinematography,, if you enjoyed the one that came before, you will probably like this one. I give it an A+. Get stuckmanized" You are an easily pleased Idiot if you like his Sh1t

Interesting

They wanted to fast track their own Avengers style team but with Spider-Men and Spider-Women. Then they flipped the script when they got the impression it wasn't gonna work that this was not connected to anything.

Criticism is not about reviewing films. You like didn’t wanna go in there and hate the movie but then again when it insults their intelligence and it talks down to them, they get really upset I’m sorry north fucking sucks

When I found out today that there is a group channel that’s with popular movie critics and with KZreadrs like critical drinker, joining in on the Podcast reacting to Chris Stuckerman’s’s favorite list of movies of 2023. And they were reacting to other things on his channel, just criticizing the living hell out of Chris. I’m thinking to myself why are grown adults dedicating videos of reacting to Chris, making fun of his opinions and making fun of his takes on his list? Constantly pausing every few seconds just to bad mouth Chris. Personally, I’m just thinking to myself. What is Chris really doing besides just being honest and having an ego? Anyone who is an artist has had an ego once in their life, even if your ego is small at 10% that still counts because it can still grow within you. I acknowledge Chris does have an ego, but at the same time he also knows more about the business compared to people who only rely on Google information, and some people in Hollywood who are okay to talk about the business outside of powerful people, when they agreed to do interviews with KZreadrs. The way that I look at it, is that you can disagree with him as a movie reviewer, but Chris is not a bad person. He’s not being an asshole or being completely awful. He’s just being critical on his honest feelings about Sony. but how many grown people need to keep reacting and making fun of him? It just begs the question why do you insist on making fun of somebody who you don’t even know personally? I just do not comprehend the situation of adults criticizing another adult, who does not have any business or bad relationships with them at all. But your personally attacking him just because he has a different ideology that isn’t yours? When people say things like I don’t understand why everyone is subscribe to this guy? That goes for every KZreadr tbh, but when you say that, it tells me that you think you’re above the rest for whatever reason, even though people have their own reasons, why they are not enjoying your content compared to someone else. Thank you for being honest with your video man, that’s my feelings towards the subject, and everyone criticizing him. People just want war and Chris isn’t giving them that kind of content and he’s not obligated to. 😌

@gravesidepoet5405

2 ай бұрын

“Leave Britney alone!!!”- this guy

@kmbae.3211

2 ай бұрын

Chris is just trying his best not to be a part of the reactive, hate-mongering culture in the film criticism community on KZread. He’s trying to keep his corner level-headed during such divisive times. Is it annoying how avoidant he can be at times when something isn’t great or has flaws? Sure. But that doesn’t diminish his credibility. Simply put- if you don’t like him, don’t watch him but many people still rely on him. Also, it’s hilarious he just keeps to himself and minds his own business while other KZreadrs spend their quality time picking him apart. Speaks volumes.

@delix787

2 ай бұрын

@@kmbae.3211 if he started to react back, he would start a war with the critics. 😂

He didn't review the movie, I guess the check from Sony when threw

He’s a fraud

If u work for someone else you are micro managed

Chris Stuckman wants to be part of the Hollywood system. Which means he is going to pander like he has never before. Here are three directors I would hire to make my superhero movies Mary Harron, Karyn Kusama, and Lexi Alexander. Check out these women. I’m sure you have watched one of their movies.

So it has nothing to do with hiring talentless know nothing diversiry hacks... right...

But they’re not trying to make money. If for a decade I sold apples to my customers then switched to low quality melons, why would I yell at the customers “you hate melons”? Why not say “my bad, I was going for a market that clearly doesn’t support my product”? Why would I not switch back?

Yeah the movie was pretty bad but if you watch enough movies you can kind of tell what feels like one that just was never going to work or one that was just ruined by the studio and again if you watch enough movies you can tell this is most likely the second option. I mean on top of that Sony has long history of ruining Spider-Man movies not sure why we’re all acting as if this is wild take from Chris. Kind of feels like you just don’t like him.

@TheRealLoomar

2 ай бұрын

Yeah I just don't like him That's why the first section of my video is me agreeing with a lot of good points he made Because I clearly hate him and everything he stands for

@willdegra317

2 ай бұрын

No one said Sony didn’t mess up the movie.

Well chris sold, wrote, hired and filmed his movie. And he finished shooting recently and is editing the finished product so I'll go with his knowledge on making a movie

@onsokumaru4663

2 ай бұрын

So does this make Madame Webb a masterpiece?

@JohnM0rris

2 ай бұрын

​@@onsokumaru4663No, and Chris admitted that if you would have watched the video

@willdegra317

2 ай бұрын

Doesn’t matter. A guy can be a master chef but if people don’t like a meal they don’t like it.

@onsokumaru4663

2 ай бұрын

@@JohnM0rris He didn't admit shite, he's afraid of even reviewing the movie as a film critic, it's pathetic.

@zeroskaterz92

2 ай бұрын

So it's not Tommy Wiseau's fault that The Room is a bad movie then?

I disagree with you. I’m not in agreement with the other neither. Sony is big at fault here. They didn’t pick any of the main spider persons, they went with side characters. Marvel studio pick lower fan favorites but Iron Man and Captain America are main characters. Sony picked directors and writers and actors that were not invested in any material. Marvel Directors , writers , actors learn their characters. They read or already love the characters.

Why is everyone giving Chris Stuckmann so much s**t??

@nu-metalfan2654

2 ай бұрын

@LukeLovesRose. Because he sold out. Back in 2018 he started to think that he shouldn’t criticise directors and writers and stopped doing Worst Movies Of The Year lists. Then when Covid hit Chris stopped reviews for any movie he felt was going to be bad. Chris was a movie reviewer, and he stopped being that.

You engage in the VERY common argument of ignoring things to fit your narrative. HUMANS like different things. You list the quality collapse of Star Wars and some may agree and some won’t, but you ignored Andor which was very well received by MOST people. Chris’ issue is that he, like others, is in the industry and has now seen criticism from the other side. The problem is that he’s a reviewer and if he loses his ability to critique, his whole channel is useless. Kevin Smith is EXACTLY like this as well. Doesn’t want to hurt any feelings, but you CAN critique a film and be constructive if you know how to do it well. I guess he’s only informing us now that maybe he doesn’t. I made an independent movie like him, but it opened my eyes to how to critique and pinpoint places I had issues with films. Also, there are CCOs that do appear on sets and will throw out ideas knowing full well they have an X amount of exposure to still capture for Pepsi. “Hey, just have some fight and they pull the Pepsi sign down on him and we can make it look good in post”. If you think tampering doesn’t happen at some RIDICULOUS micro-levels, I have some stories for you.

KZreadrs using Stuckmann situation in a desperate attempt to finally get some clicks

@TheRealLoomar

2 ай бұрын

Or maybe we're just highlighting what a shallow, contradictory statement he made (my video isn't even a proper breakdown of what he says, you can find others breaking down just how bad this video is)

@lilmissknowitall5775

2 ай бұрын

@@TheRealLoomar Your channel will get clicks, hang in there.

@TheRealLoomar

2 ай бұрын

Yup, just keep going on about clicks instead of trying to add anything of substance I didn't expect anything better from your opening remark

How bout we all be honest and acknowledge that 99% of mainstream comics are trash (and always have been). We can easily conclude that at least 99% of superhero movies based off mainstream comic characters/stories are trash as well. Yes, this means that your favorite superhero fimls and franchises are OBJECTIVE trash. You may disagree, but you are incorrect. You have general shit taste in movies and comics. Yes... YOU, the individual that is aggravated with this comment 😊

Stuckman only likes movie that are woke.

I'll take the man who actually funded, casted, produced, directed, wrote, and is currently editing in post production a feature film. You on the other hand is just a youtube guy. And pls don't come at me after you just tried going after Chris. Just pointing out you have no reference amd its weird that you have a mighty opinion.

@TheRealLoomar

2 ай бұрын

If that's your opinion on it. Personally I find the idea that an executive came down from their office and told Dakota Johnson to act poorly throughout the entire movie, told the stunt man who was driving the ambulance at the beginning in the high speed chase scene to only drive 20mph, told the main bad guy to just stand there not doing anything for a full minute etc etc ludicrous, but to each their own

Chris is easily one of the best film critics on KZread. If he wants to do a segment where he does not review a movie, but instead talks about a greater problem that the film calls to mind, that is his right and is a worthwhile thing to do. Meanwhile, there are MANY KZread reviews about Madame Web, and they all say the exact same things as one another. Their level of discourse is very basic and low, and they are not really worth watching. So, which of those did you decide to talk about? All of the low-level, insubstantive parrot snark kids? Or Chris's intelligent and worthwhile video? So... is what YOU do worthwhile?

🤣 I can’t believe you babies are crying about Stuckman so much, Jesus Christ