🤯 This was amazing! Y'all are doing awesome work. We need more of this, insha Allah 🤯

@upondivineguidanceorder2548

2 ай бұрын

Notice how they put out academic work In order for us to be able to refute foolery Not like some who still crying and making videos for the past 2-3 years Of immigrant muslims not giving them Salaam While we have pseudo Afrocentrism Falsify information on Islam And other Deviant groups Lying to out people While some KZread channels wasting time focusing on telling cry baby stories About not getting Salaams being returned Damn shame 🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️

@AAA-be6wk

2 ай бұрын

This guy does a lot of talking but gives very little knowledge about the history of Kemet. Check out mustafa briggs He tells us elementary history of islam and africa

Thoroughly enjoyed this session, my only critique is that it ended! I would love that you take a deep dive on present day Sudan (Kush, Nubia, Ethiopia. Sudan)... (and I hope you get to interview some of our elders who were present or heard from their elders, I'm sure you will be plesently surprised ;) )... PLEASE DO NOT STOP! Keep'em coming brother... waiting for the follow up session

The main line narrative of history changed and people changed sides with the invention of the Gatling gun and Maxim gun. These are the weapons that facilitated the European colonization of 1884 by which was the destruction and excavation of many African artifacts and civilizations destructions. " Please pick up a copy of our book..The Royal African War Elephant". It is hands down one of the most informative power packed history books published. Collections of authentic descriptions of The Equatorial South African kingdoms that tamed trained and mounted the African Bush elephant. Rare images real history missing from history books. Which is the reason why it's so hard for non-Africans to understand African history.

Every video i am getting goosebumps and new know thank you for such info ❤

This is an enlightening, educative and insightful session. Keep up the good work!

Clear and concise, the emphasis of each word was on point.

Absolutely brilliant mashaallah Much needed conversations. Thanks you 🙏

Interesting stuff..

Good job. Keep going. 👍

Afrocentrism focus is on the glory and achievements of black history which probably served a purpose at a point in time in order to raise the mental status of oppressed black people in america . However what is need now is self criticism and a revision of history highlighting our mistakes . we should be asking how could we be colonized , why didnt we invent weopons to counteract weopons used against us, why didnt we develop scripts instead of relying on oral traditions, why didnt we spend more on civil infrastucture etc etc

@Taylordessalines

2 ай бұрын

Depends on what Afrocentrics you’re talking about. People like Chancellor Williams and even Diop talked about our mistakes.

@mrlesta

2 ай бұрын

@@Taylordessalines chancellor williams need talk about his own mistakes. There was no Zulu and Arab war as depicted on the front cover of his book. Instead of making up pictures we need utilize prinary sources in order to understand history.

@baerkaabnaab2388

2 ай бұрын

You don't know your left from your right.

Historyun can you invite Dr.Abdullah Hakim Quick and Abdul Haq Ashanti together on your platform to discuss historical individuals or movements pertaining to African or African American past present or future achievements something to recommend in the future insha'Allah.

Thank you to both of you. This is another beauty of Islam, that it is based on merits, not on nationality or race! A person is judged on his brains and his heart. The christians have been very busy telling the story of Islam being spread by the sword, slavery of men and women, ect, when they themselves are more guilty of that. Offcourse we had wars and some bad leadership here and there, but who can on this Earth can claim not to be guilty of that from time to time?

Another brilliant discussion🔥 Can I clarify something brother? You mentioned applying the mind and intellect to history but not being able to do this to the Quran / Hadith. From my understanding the Quran encourages us constantly to reflect and apply our intellect to the message of the Quran. Would you kindly elaborate ypur meaning and general thoughts on this? Jzk

@Historyun

2 ай бұрын

Barakallahu Feekum We are called to contemplate and reflect upon the Qur'an however this does not permit us to prioritise or even equate logic and rationale with Revelation. To the contrary, it is mandatory to be critical and to exercise logic as much as possible when reading historical narrative, where logic and reason come into conflict with the text, we are permitted to outright reject the historical narrative (whereas this rule clearly doesn't apply to Quran or even Hadith)

@MrResearcher122

2 ай бұрын

@@Historyun Salam alikum, the Mutizilah would of course offer a different opinion.

MashaAllah ❤️🇵🇰❤️ Great brother from the Ashanti's of Ghana. The great ancient nations of great Africa. MashaAllah. Al-Humdullah.

Envy of each other has been the greatest reason for our delusion and downfall.

I wouldn't describe the Byzantine as Eastern European at the time of Islamic cpnquest. They saw themselves as Roman were in the main of Greek language and culture and Aramaic in the Levant.They were of the Mediterranean civilization which at that time were mainly Christian.

@Historyun

2 ай бұрын

The Eastern Roman empire to be more exact but Byzantium for short, which is the correct historical term given the decline of the Western Roman empire at the time.

@al-al5497

2 ай бұрын

Who invented the word Byzantine?" because the Prophet (ﷺ) referred to the ruler Heraclius as *عَظِيمِ الرُّومِ* "‏ بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ، مِنْ مُحَمَّدٍ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ إِلَى هِرَقْلَ عَظِيمِ الرُّومِ، السَّلاَمُ عَلَى مَنِ اتَّبَعَ الْهُدَى، أَمَّا بَعْدُ ‏"‏‏ No mention of "Byzantine" or "Eastern Roman Empire"

Very good discussion and interesting topic. I would like to add on the point that we shouldn’t use our critical minds especially regarding Hadith, that this is not accurate. If we look at Hisham bin Urwa whom after the defeat of his uncle Abdullah bin Zubair migrated to Iraq and became part of the ummayid court. Many strange things are coming from him during this period, many things that distort history as he his often the lone path to Aiesha (ra) and from him come for example the very young age of Aiesha when married among many other things. Scholars have written about this and the people of madina wouldnt except his narrations from Iraq. But the point is the same requirement for critical analysis is required from people of a certain level just like history and In fact there’s a cross over. I agree if it’s undeniable that prophet (saaw) said something we accord its import. Jzk

@al-al5497

2 ай бұрын

"we shouldn’t use our critical minds especially regarding Hadith, that this is not accurate." Who said this? Allah? Allah's Messenger? or your critical mind?

@lifeisgood5698 Yes Arabs were darker than present, but they had a distinct look. The Kemites, (ancient Egyptians) depicted the different racial types. In fact, the darker Arabs were an admixture of East Africans and the original Arabs. Upwards to one third of Muhammad's army consisted of East Africans. I can go through the history and tell you why they were there. I can tell you how it is related to the Ethiopian Empire, losing its colonial power in Arabia, and how these Africans became prisoners of war. From the outset, Africans were treated badly by Arabs.

No they weren't Muslim at the time The Romans conkers Egypt after Cleopatra then they took people from northern Syria to rolled in Egypt they were known as Mama Lok the what we now come to as white Egyptian but in reality they are not Egyptian neither are they Arab basically they have highjack the back Egyptian history. What we must understand is that the white people don't like the fact that African are more advanced than they even now that also apply to the Arab's. Looks at the real mask of King Tutankhamun we will see a black African face why do you think that they broke off the nose's of all the status of ancient Egypt. Also look at what they did to Timbuktu the Moroccan with the aid of the enemies of Islam destroy Timbuktu because they could not accept that African possessed such great knowledge on Islamic jurisprudence. My ancestors are of Mail Timbuktu told to me by my paternal grandmother also by DAN. The European Renaissance really derived from the knowledge of Timbuktu.

@AkanBenDja

2 ай бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@AkanBenDja

2 ай бұрын

Conkers 😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫

(Sahih Muslim 2543) You would soon conquer Egypt and that is a land which is known (as the land of al-qirat). So when you conquer it, treat its inhabitants well. For there lies upon you the responsibility because of blood-tie (with them)

@Historyun

2 ай бұрын

Thank you for that brilliant insight

Small correction, although the neo-amazigh nationalists are certainly overzealous in their positions and counter-productive for the union of the ummah, the crushing majority of them will never dare to consciously oppose Islam. They are for the most part victims of the now global European sentiment that every spoken language should be represented by a unified nation. They’re often unaware that many foreign agents use and promote these sentiments to divide and conquer Muslims worldwide. Also I must admit, as an opponent of the nationalist movement, Tariq ibn Ziyad was a native and not an Arab, same goes for his army.

@jabu1591

2 ай бұрын

The Amazigh nationalist are a response to the erasure of their culture and history by Arabs and Arabized communities.

Threw hearning

Amazing work. However, I find it ironic that the ustaadh said we should not judge based on emotion but then proceeded to quote as he calls it "ahlus sunnah ahl hadith" aka Salafi D'awah the modern phenomenon. Secondly, Slavery not being morally something Islam was happy with is very subjective.

There is absolutely nothing anyone can do or say to cover up the truth as pertaining to Islam and her treatment of West African People's. Period

As a black man with Amazigh ancestry. I thank you.

@Revitalization4241

2 ай бұрын

What do you mean by that? Do you mean you have some Amazigh ancestry or do you belong to a specific caste like the Imzilen or Inadan who are originally not Amazigh but Berberised Nilo-Saharans or Sub-Saharans

Dispora knows all Most

So if it was a mutual coming together why did have to invade Egypt ask west Africans

Seems like you didn't read Chancellor Williams' work because you are misinterpreting his work..

@vegeta2703

2 ай бұрын

Chancellor Williams claims Arabs invaded Sub Saharan Africa... this isn't true. Arabs never defeated black Africans in any war, they lost the 2 battles of Dongola and after that Islam mainly spread into Sub Saharan Africa through trade... thereafter it was Black Muslims that spread Islam further through conquest. Egypt at the time was in the hands of Romans.

His Mother Ethiopia father Tribe Yemen Houti 2nd Masjid 18 companions Buried in Front Yard Kin Neggas Toumb

Egypt has been ruled by the Egyptians, by the Amazigh, by the Nubians. Just a normal history of a region.

The problem with the Haddiths, is that they always cast Islam in a favourable light; sometimes they insert Arabism, and pass it off as Islam; and sometimes they contradict history and the Quran. For example, in a Haddith by Al Bukari, it states that Muhammad was white, yet history shows that he had Arab and Ethiopean ancestry. Again, in some Haddiths, it is claimed that the Prophet supported stoning of women who commited aduultery. Yet the Quran, which claims to be perfectly protected and preserved, states that, the punishment for an adulterer, is 100 lashes.

@Historyun

2 ай бұрын

Have you ever sat in a classroom with a qualified Muslim teacher or instructor to derive this information? Have you ever read a single verse of the Qur'an in Arabic, ever? Have you ever read a single word from a single hadith and understood a single thing from the original Arabic sources? Do not overestimate your opinions or undermine the 1400 year tradition of scholarship within the Muslim world itself. Our teachers have taught us well, we are not in need of interpretations from unknown and unqualified sources.

@lindsaywaterman2010

2 ай бұрын

@@Historyun Yes! Yes! Yes! Facts are facts. I would give $50 000.00 to anybody who can disprove what I said; in particular those two examples. It seem that you do know those facts. I am willinng to have a discourse in English and Quranic Arabic to show many contradictions between the Hadiths and the Quran. Furthermore, there is not a Muslim scholar on Earth that can contradict those statements!

@vincentkivuva584

2 ай бұрын

This is why Hadith are graded. There are also fabricated Hadiths meant to achieve other nefarious intentions. And as a Muslim you don't have to accept or follow the teachings of every Hadith that you have doubts in the massage. Have discussions with a teacher if you can't take a position on it on your own.

@Historyun

2 ай бұрын

@@lindsaywaterman2010 a better investment would be to take that $50,000 and spend it on a therapist or medication. All the best 👋🏿

@lindsaywaterman2010

2 ай бұрын

@@Historyun You know, this is typical of those half-baked "scholars" who tried to fool ignorant people, but are incapable of defending their positions. You are now a psychiatrist? Even before Islamic theology was developed, early Muslims answered Christian criticisms by quoting verses from the Quran. They never resorted to personal insults. Even in my University days in the 1970s, I have had polite discourse with Muslims from all over the Middle East and the arguments were taken to Mullahs for arbitration. In every case, my viewpoints were upheld. You are a disrespectful young man; and that attitude had no place in academia.

💚🙏🏿💓🇭🇹👍🏾

The Southern Arabians settled in Mauritania and brought their cultural values and imposed their mores. Slavery was recently abolished. Mauritania is the model.

@michellemccook9904

2 ай бұрын

That's not accurate. Also, slavery is alive and well in Mauritania and most Arab nations.

@strangerli6771

2 ай бұрын

Slavery wasn’t solely about race or skin color. When discussing slavery, it might be easier to believe that people of black African descent were oppressed and others were the oppressors. However, this isn’t entirely accurate. black Africans enslaved their fellow Africans. This wasn’t limited to one region either. In Mauritania and many other African regions, there were many cases of tribes enslaving other members of their own race. it’s important to remember that slavery was not solely a matter of race, but a universal practice. this something many black africans choose to ignore

@crenshawgrinder4725

2 ай бұрын

@strangerli6771 We know about the intricacies and nuances of more than most. We understand slavery as an almost universal practice, but we also know about the times slavery became racialized as well. As recent descendants of slavery, we study the history of slavery and race and understand the intersection of the two. Helots in Sparta, Slavs, Untouchables in Yemen and India, the caste system in West Africa, the Bantus in East Africa, and etc.

32:47...Yes, EARLY ISLAM when Blks were RESPECTED!!! So u have to ask yourself, what happened to change that?

@kazeno7san

2 ай бұрын

Hypocrites came into power with diff agenda..n exiles killed rival scholars that in their way.

Black identity is a reverse engineered version of white identity. There was no such identity before european colonialism and trans atlantic slave trade. Modern Black identity ideology known as Afrocentrism is just another flavor of Marxism based on skin tone, aiming to make people from subsaharan Africa able to claim the history and heritage of north Africa, especially Egypt, without any soild basis. North African history and heritage are not for sale. If anybody wants to get some of it, he should bring something equivalent to it from his own culture, if he has any.

23:07 until the salafi movement people just wrote everything in books? And didnt focus on evidences?? Seems very low bar for this channel i am disappointed you didnt correct him. How can salafis be ahlul hadith when their biggest muhadith doesnt even have ijaza?? And most of ahlul hadith in history were in fact ashari not anthropomorphists

Afree think start with the black people let them keep their lies no matter how long truth will come 💯

Really, the only thing wrong about the Afrocentric position is the genetic change. Essentially everything else is correct. And this is an exercise in switching negative terms for positive terms to describe the exact same thing.

@jinkess

2 ай бұрын

I respectfully disagree... Afrocentrics are unfortunately no different than the white colonizers who only saw and spread a singular narrative that benefits their point of view. You wish to cancel parts of history and worse you dismiss nations upon nations to suit.

@Wartensteiin You clearly do not understand what adultery means. Adultery means sex between two people, male and female, where at least one person is married. In the Quran, when two people who have sex, where neither is married, that is referred to as fornication. The sentence in the Quran, was to place the two young people under house arrest for a period. In other words, confine them. Do you know what you are saying? You are implying that the Quran did not give perfect and complete instructs but it depends on Hadiths. Islamic scholars will tell you that when a Hadith contradict the Quran, that Hadith should be rejected. Let us first be clear that Muhammad was a man of integrity and would NOT say anything that contradicts the revelation of the QURAN. The Quran states, حُرِّمَتْ عَلَيْكُمُ ٱلْمَيْتَةُ وَٱلدَّمُ وَلَحْمُ ٱلْخِنزِيرِ وَمَآ أُهِلَّ لِغَيْرِ ٱللَّهِ بِهِۦ وَٱلْمُنْخَنِقَةُ وَٱلْمَوْقُوذَةُ وَٱلْمُتَرَدِّيَةُ وَٱلنَّطِيحَةُ وَمَآ أَكَلَ ٱلسَّبُعُ إِلَّا مَا ذَكَّيْتُمْ وَمَا ذُبِحَ عَلَى ٱلنُّصُبِ وَأَن تَسْتَقْسِمُوا۟ بِٱلْأَزْلَـٰمِ ۚ ذَٰلِكُمْ فِسْقٌ ۗ ٱلْيَوْمَ يَئِسَ ٱلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا۟ مِن دِينِكُمْ فَلَا تَخْشَوْهُمْ وَٱخْشَوْنِ ۚ ٱلْيَوْمَ أَكْمَلْتُ لَكُمْ دِينَكُمْ وَأَتْمَمْتُ عَلَيْكُمْ نِعْمَتِى وَرَضِيتُ لَكُمُ ٱلْإِسْلَـٰمَ دِينًۭا ۚ فَمَنِ ٱضْطُرَّ فِى مَخْمَصَةٍ غَيْرَ مُتَجَانِفٍۢ لِّإِثْمٍۢ ۙ فَإِنَّ ٱللَّهَ غَفُورٌۭ Al-Ma’idah Surah 5:3. The last sentence of that verse states: “This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favour upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion.” The penalty for Muslims who commit adultery amongst themselves is a flogging with 100 lashes. ٱلزَّانِيَةُ وَٱلزَّانِي فَٱجۡلِدُواْ كُلَّ وَٰحِدٖ مِّنۡهُمَا مِاْئَةَ جَلۡدَةٖۖ وَلَا تَأۡخُذۡكُم بِهِمَا رَأۡفَةٞ فِي دِينِ ٱللَّهِ إِن كُنتُمۡ تُؤۡمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلۡيَوۡمِ ٱلۡأٓخِرِۖ وَلۡيَشۡهَدۡ عَذَابَهُمَا طَآئِفَةٞ مِّنَ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنِينَ AL-NUR Surah 24:2 Below is a translation. “The adulterer and the adulteress, scourge ye each one of them (with) a hundred stripes. And let not pity for the twain withhold you from obedience to Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of believers witness their punishment.” So when some Muslims, who support the death penalty for women who commit adultery claim that the punishment is in the Hadiths or sayings of the Prophet. Those people are dishonouring their prophet and slandering his integrity by implying that he deliberately added to the perfected revelation of Allah and contradicted it. Some even said that stoning was in the Quran but a goat ate the injunction. Those people are implying that Allah lied when he said that he will watch over his Word, the Quran and preserve and protect it. The Arabs, who were brown, knew what black means. Muhammad's Army consisted of one third East Africans. I went through a brief history of that. When Prophet Muhammad was persecuted by his tribe, the Quraysh, he sent them to Abyssinia, present day Ethiopia, to seek protection for his followers, from a BLACK KING; so don't invent stories. When a Hadith had the Prophet insulting Africans and stating that their hair look like raisins, I guess he was talking about a different black people with curly hair. Really? Which other people in the world that live close to Arabia, have that type of hair? The first Muezzin, who called the first Muslims to prayer was a black man, an Ethiopian. If the Prophet was racist, who insulted black people, he would not have selected Belial to be the first Muezzin. I reject those false Hadiths that claims that the Prophet insulted black Africans.

Salam if you look at Nubians hieroglyphics they are black. Egyptians are different.

@fromabove422

2 ай бұрын

Nubians come in all colors... Just like kemites

@user-lz5dz1qx2q

2 ай бұрын

Nubians are Hematic people, Hematic peoples including nowadays Somalia, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, and Sudan They are more blacker than Eygption but more whiter than the rest of Africa

@fromabove422

2 ай бұрын

Why do u guys keep saying these things that are objectively untrue? South Africans are lighter than everyone in east Africa.

@fromabove422

2 ай бұрын

Do you honestly think Egyptians or nubians will draw a brown skin south african as black?

@user-lz5dz1qx2q

2 ай бұрын

@@fromabove422 Eygptions

Bilal was Ethiopian

As a man he losed the best part of his man body to become a moslim.

Also Kurdish nationalists have a problem with Arabs and the Arabic language, same way like the Amazigh.

110000 sold off East Coast Africa

Egyptian ancient history is Somalia 🇸🇴 history pharaohs and all ancient Egypt is Somalia history

@kwamemaatranyame-mentuhote9952

2 ай бұрын

Somalia have no history of building any great civilization ever lol

@hughmaseko9780

2 ай бұрын

Absolutely false.

@xamsexikmaawi7570

2 ай бұрын

@@hughmaseko9780 in your dreams taasi waa riyadaada

Profet musa was black up to narration, most merciful people i have known were black our dad Adam was black I'm from Egypt and I belive black people are under respected Muslims and none Muslims alhamdolillah I have this understanding they are also very smart and very strong minded besides they are strong on body first muazen in islam is black his name was bilal

But then good preserved pyramids, and documents would be found in other east and central African countries - cause again, there would be a natural urge to expand the pharaoh kingdom more east and south. I don't want this to be one a division in a time when the Africans, Arab, Asian countries moving closer and forming alliances.

Before Egypt and Sudan became Muslim they were world rulers

@swalihmm

2 ай бұрын

Vefore Egypt became muslim they became christian and were under the Romans, not very world ruler of them at time either.

@whoahna8438

2 ай бұрын

@@swalihmm They were as much Roman at that time as they are Arab now

@swalihmm

2 ай бұрын

@@whoahna8438 and? What difference does it make to your initial argument?

@whoahna8438

2 ай бұрын

@@swalihmm Islam and Christianity brought Egypt down

@swalihmm

2 ай бұрын

@@whoahna8438 the Ptolemic dynasty wasnt particularly "world ruling" from Egypt either.

Your anti africanist ideology is showing. Egypt is from Nubia. Descendants of Miriam, descendants of Ham, black and dark. Whether you like it or not or how it changed over time due to the influence of other people Egypt was originally a black civilization. Especially considering the fact that it is Africans who Fathered the rest of man kind before their evolution

Egyptians weren't bantu they were a mix of Sumerian and Nubian/ Ethiopian .. afrocentrism alive and well with the help[ of AI .. because we all know the great history of egypt was mixed.. much of the architecture standing in egypt was roman and greek very few things besides the pyramids of the early dynasties.. and it makes sense because writing megalithic architecture and cow worshiping cow drinking DNA comes from Eurasia.. there were black Egyptians.. but they were mixed and most of the history of egypt they were mixed.. and nothing like the AI art featured

@kwamemaatranyame-mentuhote9952

2 ай бұрын

Mentu is the singular for Plural Bantu , how is Bantu words in their language then

@hughmaseko9780

2 ай бұрын

​@kwamemaatranyame-mentuhote9952 Good question.

@hughmaseko9780

2 ай бұрын

You actually need to read a book or several.

Kemet means black soil its a small portion of egypt and the rest of egypt is deshret red sands , its like greenland... not for green PEOPLE... 😂 the copts were always there lol with nubia/sudan as their neighbours, sudan invaded them and ruled over them ... then in the 1800s egypt ruled over sudan...

@fromabove422

2 ай бұрын

It doesn't mean black soil because coptic today keme means black man 😂

@cracksmoker1506

2 ай бұрын

​@@fromabove422so kemet means black soil and keme means black man 😂 okay so much information in 1 letter

@djt241

2 ай бұрын

In coptic keme means black?​@@fromabove422

@HISTORYUN Surprisingly, Arabs traditionally never practised Islam, they practised Arabism: cultural traditions that are passed off as Islam. In the Quran there is no death sentence for adultery or blasphemy. In the Sura Al-Nur, meaning The Light, chapter24:4-5. “An adulterer does not consort except with an adulteress or an idolatrous woman, an adulteress does not consort except with an adulterer or with an idolatrous man. Such conduct is forbidden.” So we see that it is forbidden for Muslims to commit adultery among themselves but is not forbidden for them to commit adultery with idolaters. But what is the penalty when Muslims commit adultery amongst themselves? The penalty for Muslims who commit adultery amongst themselves is a flogging with 100 lashes. ٱلزَّانِيَةُ وَٱلزَّانِي فَٱجۡلِدُواْ كُلَّ وَٰحِدٖ مِّنۡهُمَا مِاْئَةَ جَلۡدَةٖۖ وَلَا تَأۡخُذۡكُم بِهِمَا رَأۡفَةٞ فِي دِينِ ٱللَّهِ إِن كُنتُمۡ تُؤۡمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلۡيَوۡمِ ٱلۡأٓخِرِۖ وَلۡيَشۡهَدۡ عَذَابَهُمَا طَآئِفَةٞ مِّنَ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنِينَ AL-NUR Surah 24:2 Below is a translation. “The adulterer and the adulteress, scourge ye each one of them (with) a hundred stripes. And let not pity for the twain withhold you from obedience to Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of believers witness their punishment.” .THERE IS NO MENTION OF BLASPHEMY OR ANY PENALTY FOR IT IN THE QURAN! The Quran states, “This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favour upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion.” Al-Ma’idah 5:3. So when some Muslims, who support the death penalty for women who commit adultery claim that the punishment is in the Hadith or sayings of the Prophet. Those people are dishonouring their prophet and slandering his integrity by implying that he deliberately added to the perfected revelation of Allah and contradicted it. Arabism is rife in Africa: setting the two Abrahamic faith against each other; faiths that peacefully coexisted for generations; Muslims killing Muslims and Christians. Africans, remember that Saudi Arabia abolished slavery, ONLY in 1962. These Arabs are always confiscating the passports of poor African maids, raping them and in some cased executing them. You do not hear of the Saudis executing white men or white women. The practice of Wahhabi Islam is fundamentally racist and organizations like Boko Haram and Al Shabazz are duped stooges that are anti-African. Remember that, there is no mention of blasphemy in the Quran. Would Muhammad express views that were counter to the Quran? All punishments for blasphemy is based on the Hadiths or sayings of the prophet Muhammad. Sharia law is nothing more than cultural Arab practice, Wahhabi Islam or Arabism. Dear fellow Africans, as one who is a product of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade, I tell you that the biggest hindrance to Africa’s and Africans’ progress is Christianity and Islam.

@nickeydasun9011

2 ай бұрын

💯 correct

@ahmedsalek976

2 ай бұрын

Another Sunnah rejector, funny.

@hughmaseko9780

2 ай бұрын

Well said..

​ @houda2coral924 By denying a thing, does not make your denial true. Here are two books that present overwhelming evidence: 1) Aminu: The African Ancestry of Prophet Muhammad Paperback - June 6, 2021 by Ndagi Abdullahi (Author) 2) Black Arabia & the African Origin of Islam Paperback - October 31, 2009 by Dr. Wesley Muhammad (Author)

Here we go again with the Black American History disinformation session.

@Taylordessalines

2 ай бұрын

You obviously didn’t watch the vid.

People have this thing of saying Amen to pray it's not bad until used against Amen Ra which is also a Soul it's kinda hard to explain ❤️🦾😇👋

True origin of Islam is Atenism the religion of Pharaoh Akhenaten.

So if the Byzantine were racist to dark Arab what happened to the native black Egyptians?

@MorrisJohn-vo2vn

2 ай бұрын

Yeah, the Byzantines were but he then dodges to mention that so we're the Arabs. A Black Muslim that he turn of the second millenia literally wrote the book "the glory of the black race" to respond to Arab racism against Blacks. And no, Byzantine racism against Blacks wasn't really worse. Constantinople hosted many Nubian and Ethiopian pilgrims, even in royal palaces.

@karimb972

2 ай бұрын

If Egypt (kemet) was ever fully black it could only have been thousands of years before the first Pharaohs because most of the mummies unearthed were not subsaharan Black

@cledwards

2 ай бұрын

@@MorrisJohn-vo2vn He didn't dodge anything he touched on the subject in the video, I suggestion you read his book.

@muslim_first

2 ай бұрын

@@karimb972 subsaharan black love ancient Egyptian history why they want to be related to firaun

@justice70567

2 ай бұрын

​​​​@@MorrisJohn-vo2vn In that book al-jahiz collected and wrote down what the zanj said about themselves. Just read other works of Al-Jahiz and see what he says about the zanjs. Not very nice things.