Is LG OLED Really That Bad?

Ғылым және технология

Thank you to Ruipro for sponsoring this video!
Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (6FT): amzn.to/3wvHB7j
Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (25FT): amzn.to/432NDGS
Buy Ruipro Cables: ruipro.store/collections/all
Please Support My Work (Guides & Discord): / thedisplayguy
Is LG OLED Really That Bad?
For years we worshiped at the altar of WOLED displays like the LG C series TVs, yet now I’ve spotted a growing sentiment since the release of QD OLED that WOLED TVs and monitors are “trash” and get destroyed by QD OLED, but is this actually true, or does WOLED still hold value today, well lets pencil dive straight in
Now WOLED as you might imagine stands for white OLED and is named such for the extra white subpixel used in addition to the traditional Red, Green, and Blue you might see in an LCD based display, which may seem strange at face value, but this extra subpixel was key to greatly reducing the risk of burn in on early OLED TVs.
Now today, anti burn in technologies and OLED durability have been greatly improved, but once it was but a foreign concept, hence the aforementioned extra white to reduce strain on red, green, and blue, but then something happened that would make LG clench like never before.
Samsung came busting out of the closet soy facing and jump scared LG with their brand new QD OLED technology which combined OLED with quantum dots and did away with traditional polarizing layers to enhance color volume and overall brightness.
The advantage of Samsung’s new QD OLED technology was that they were able to produce far more color than WOLED which, unfortunately likely due to the extra white subpixel, can struggle with color volume in HDR. Not only that, but WOLED has worse uniformity and even some noticeable vertical banding on gray screens which sometimes can’t be solved even with a manual pixel clean.
QD OLED has no such issues. So with better color and uniformity, and today oftentimes lower prices as well is WOLED done for?
Not necessarily, and here's why.
LG has a far better glossy coating. One of the best things about OLEDs is that MOST of them especially TVs will use a glossy coating to give the best image quality possible, but whoopsie doodle QD OLED because they have ditched a polarizing layer for a Quantum dot layer, seems to have an issue where ambient light may be energizing the QD layer leading to either a magenta or gray tint when presented with even a small amount of ambient light, which can defeat the main purpose of OLED in a bright room, it’s ability to show true black.
LG on the other hand uses an excellent glossy coating on their C series OLED TVs which looks black even in a very bright room, the only issue is that for now all their OLED monitors use a grainy and oily matte coating which greatly harms the image quality, though it sounds like there is a good chance this will change soon.
LG WOLED can get usually get brighter. The S95D QD OLED TV is an exception to this as it may very well be the brightest OLED on the market, but typically WOLED can get brighter, just at the cost of color volume as we discussed previously
LG WOLED typically has more accurate color and gamma tracking for professionals in my experience. Now this almost certainly isn’t always going to be true, and it’s important to eyeball as many reviews as possible for each product you're thinking of throwing hands with, but in my experience, especially on TVs LG tends to do a better job of creating accurate modes for creators and film buffs which I greatly appreciate.
The latest LG WOLED displays are starting to ship with a new RGWB subpixel arrangement which is about as close to a regular RGB layout we've seen on OLE leading to better text and less noticeable chromatic aberration such as red and green lines on the edges of text and objects like we often see on QD OLED which unfortunately uses a triangle arrangement.
My Favorite HDR Displays (For Now). Affiliate links below. I earn commission on purchases.
Best 4K OLED Monitors
LG C4 42" (4K 144Hz OLED: amzn.to/49smYrf
LG G4 55" (4K 144Hz OLED): amzn.to/3Uow3MD
Samsung 55" (4K 144Hz OLED) S90C: amzn.to/4bQPt3q
Gigabyte 32" (4K 240Hz OLED) FO32U2: amzn.to/3W42Do0
MSI MPG 32" (4K 240Hz OLED) 321URX: amzn.to/4ek1Oyg
MSI MAG 32" (4K 240Hz OLED) 321UPX: amzn.to/3VGknWE
Alienware 32” (4K 240Hz OLED) AW3225QF: howl.me/clPs75aw3DU
What Happened - 0:00
WOLED - 0:23
QD OLED - 0:58
LG OLED Pros - 1:51
The Future - 4:48
LG OLED TVs - 5:20
Cables - 5:43
Music
www.davidcuttermusic.com

Пікірлер: 130

  • @thedisplayguy
    @thedisplayguy4 күн бұрын

    Thank you to Ruipro for sponsoring this video! Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (6FT): amzn.to/3wvHB7j Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (25FT): amzn.to/432NDGS Buy Ruipro Cables: ruipro.store/collections/all Please Support My Work (Guides & Discord): patreon.com/TheDisplayGuy

  • @KiSs0fd3aTh
    @KiSs0fd3aTh3 күн бұрын

    Seeing a glossy Woled (lg c2), a matte Woled and a glossy QD OLED, I have to say the following. The QD oled is NOT glossy. Semi glossy, maybe. It is nowhere near anywhere close to the LG C2, which is a mirror. The QD oled feels like a glass, not a mirror. The matte LG Woled isn't matte either, it's kinda semi matte. You can see the matte issues if you pixel peep or sit really close to it, like ~30 cms. Yes, it's obvious. But nobody sits 30 cms away. From further away, you can' tell sh***t unless on a full white screen. And now to put thing into perspective, the freaking QD Oled cannot for the life of it display BLACK. You have to turn off every freaking light. At this point it seems that even an RGB keyboard affects it's black levels. Yes, I'd prefer a glossy woled over a matte woled, but I also prefer a matte woled over the gray QD oled.

  • @NexGenTek

    @NexGenTek

    6 сағат бұрын

    Lmao RGb keyboards do not affect the panel and no it’s not semi matte it’s completely glossy. Turn off the lights it’s a oled it’s not impressive unless the lights are off

  • @seizonsha

    @seizonsha

    Сағат бұрын

    even an RGB keyboard affects it's black levels-----> lying gets you what exactly???

  • @Spealer
    @Spealer4 күн бұрын

    I feel like as of recently you’ve changed your content from being a lot of doom and gloom and overly clickbaity, to more fact based, well thought out videos with good humor thrown in. I appreciate you keeping it real man 🤙

  • @thedisplayguy

    @thedisplayguy

    4 күн бұрын

    Thanks 🙏

  • @gorofujita5767

    @gorofujita5767

    3 күн бұрын

    I have never seen any "doom and gloom" in this channel

  • @Spealer

    @Spealer

    3 күн бұрын

    @@gorofujita5767 I have a bit ago. Or at lest most of it was extreme clickbait to get you to click.

  • @PandaMoniumHUN
    @PandaMoniumHUN3 күн бұрын

    I had a 32GS95UE (sent it back, simply because I realized I want a monitor with USB-C, nothing to do with the panel quality), and I have to say it is really good. If you put WOLED and QD-OLED next to eachother the average person will have a hard time telling them apart. I'm saying this as someone who seen LG G3 and S95C right next to eachother and chose the G3 which I am super happy with 5+ months now. The entire QD-OLED vs WOLED discussion is way blown out of proportions, both of these panel technologies are really good.

  • @Saba-jr8yb

    @Saba-jr8yb

    Күн бұрын

    I disagree, I had the 32GS95UE and switched to the AW3225QF. Right away the colors in HDR popped compared to the LG. Black crush is awful on LG’s WOLED. Something as simple as a black persons face being distorted due to black crush will be noticed by any user.

  • @NexGenTek

    @NexGenTek

    6 сағат бұрын

    Yeah Woled is terrible

  • @chesterthesniper
    @chesterthesniper3 күн бұрын

    I own both the lg and Alienware oleds and i gotta say im impressed by the lg, to me it feels a bit brighter and also the darks don't turn magenta and i don't know why but my inputs feel a little more responsive, so far im enjoying the LG. The Alienware sometimes i feel its too oversaturated.

  • @patrikmedia
    @patrikmedia4 күн бұрын

    I much prefer WOLED over QD-OLED. tested both, QD gives me headaches and eye strain when looking at details for too long. also, raised blacks are incredible annoying and I don't want to use it in a pitch black room.

  • @Savitarax

    @Savitarax

    4 күн бұрын

    This is not QD-OLEDs fault it’s the saturation. Crank up digital vibrancy in nvidia control panel and you’ll see your eyes hurt way more. It goes away over time and is a byproduct of humans perceiving saturation as brighter. This straining your eyes. Even though supposedly QD-OLED is less bright.

  • @thanos1000000fc

    @thanos1000000fc

    4 күн бұрын

    @@Savitarax Why am I not getting as much eye strain with WOLED?

  • @patrikmedia

    @patrikmedia

    4 күн бұрын

    @@Savitarax no it's the pixel layout. the chromatic abbreviation caused by it makes reading text very unpleasant. I've no problem on WOLED even if it's matte. text simply looks clearer on there at the same ppi. even if I switch to the sRGB mode which is waaay less saturated, it's the same problem. edit: and no, it doesn't go away over time. I used my QD for over 3 months, 8h+ a day working on it and gaming. when I switched to the WOLED it was such an immediate relief. I still have the QD as my secondary monitor so I have a good side by side comparison as well. reading text on QD is just awful, no matter the "vibrancy". I just wish WOLED monitors would get the same glossy coating as the LG TVs, that's my only complaint; although matte really isn't that bad as many people claim to be, most never even saw this LG monitor in person...

  • @patrikmedia

    @patrikmedia

    4 күн бұрын

    @@Savitarax both panels appear very similar in saturation in SDR mode, even more so after calibration. what causes eye strain is very simple: the pixel layout that has chromatic abbreviation as a byproduct, especially black text on white background. it's almost not existent on WOLED which is why text clarity is very close to LCD, especially at 140ppi (yes, even with LG using matte coating).

  • @GreyDireWolf

    @GreyDireWolf

    4 күн бұрын

    I agree completely, i also suffered eye strain from my s90c and raised blacks are noticeable even in dark room. WOLED is better imo

  • @PlayNeth
    @PlayNeth4 күн бұрын

    Yes. The stupid white pixel is like a "band-aid" artificial method to increase brightness with the heavy downside of washing out scenes that should be bright colors with just white. Would be cool to see like a true RGB panel from them with just MLA tbh

  • @thedisplayguy

    @thedisplayguy

    4 күн бұрын

    RGB MLA would be incredible 👏👏👏

  • @rycmrc
    @rycmrc3 күн бұрын

    Is the matte coating on LG apply to all TVs or just monitors?

  • @romkkaa

    @romkkaa

    3 күн бұрын

    Just monitors

  • @drunkhusband6257
    @drunkhusband62573 күн бұрын

    LG is WAY more reliable than Samsung, that alone is enough even if they aren't qdoled.

  • @GGP337

    @GGP337

    3 күн бұрын

    QD-OLED is way better in colour reproduction, that isn't even considering the cost reduction

  • @drunkhusband6257

    @drunkhusband6257

    3 күн бұрын

    @@GGP337 Doesn't matter if your Samsung is broken in less than a year like most peoples...

  • @GGP337

    @GGP337

    2 күн бұрын

    ​@@drunkhusband6257 monitor has 3 year warranty, I don't want people to spend money on an inferior product and to enjoy a QD-Oled monitor as much as I have

  • @NexGenTek

    @NexGenTek

    6 сағат бұрын

    @@drunkhusband6257most people my ass. I’ve had worst issues with lg than my Samsungs.

  • @davidgiles9751
    @davidgiles97514 күн бұрын

    Not related to this video, but I'd love to hear your thoughts on the Samsung 55" Odyssey Ark for use as an MSFS2020 monitor...

  • @esc.33
    @esc.332 күн бұрын

    Can you please make a video about your opinions on the best options for hybrid photo/video editing and gaming monitors please.

  • @KFC-Warrior
    @KFC-Warrior3 күн бұрын

    Glossy LG OLED is the only thing worth even considering in my opinion. Samsungs main drawback is their failure in even a small ambient amount of light.

  • @Max___Carter
    @Max___Carter3 күн бұрын

    Can you make review for SAMSUNG S90c 83 inch is 0 reviews online !

  • @5ean5ean22
    @5ean5ean224 күн бұрын

    I used both WOLED and QD-OLED and the truth is they are both great and I dont really notice a difference.

  • @vmayuri1702

    @vmayuri1702

    3 күн бұрын

    Is the Matt, really that noticeable? Tbf the matt cover is the only reason why i didnt order the LG one yet

  • @syko846

    @syko846

    3 күн бұрын

    @@vmayuri1702 if you haven't used a glossy panel you won't notice. But once you try a glossy QD OLED panel it's easy to see the difference.

  • @Insertnamehere3000

    @Insertnamehere3000

    3 күн бұрын

    Text is the issue on woled

  • @PandaMoniumHUN

    @PandaMoniumHUN

    3 күн бұрын

    @@Insertnamehere3000 Funny that you say that when the subpixel layout on the new LG WOLEDs actually makes text better than on QD-OLEDs in my opinion.

  • @michaelwyckoff7593

    @michaelwyckoff7593

    3 күн бұрын

    I have both too WOLED and QD OLED. I like both technologies😊😊

  • @michaelwyckoff7593
    @michaelwyckoff75933 күн бұрын

    The G4 is a monster😊

  • @chrisjmv
    @chrisjmv2 күн бұрын

    If LG makes a glossy coating for the OLED Monitor line-UP like they use on the C-Series WOLED would be almost a no brainer.

  • @GregKealey
    @GregKealey4 күн бұрын

    I can’t wait till we get high resolution oleds for productivity use cases. It seems like there is only 4K and below right now

  • @Saba-jr8yb
    @Saba-jr8ybКүн бұрын

    I had the 32GS95UE and returned it due to the awful crushed blacks with the latest firmware. Never touching WOLED again. Switched to the AW3225QF and those same scenes showed much more details in those dark scenes. The colors in HDR looked amazing on QD-OLED compared to LG’s WOLED.

  • @leonardobaeza5338
    @leonardobaeza53383 күн бұрын

    I've had a C1 48" for a few years. The coating is beautiful and blacks stay black under any lighting condition.

  • @jakehutchens
    @jakehutchens3 күн бұрын

    I scored my 55" LG C1 for under $1100 2yrs ago, as it was by far the best bang for buck at the time, and would not trade it for the world. Still holding out for a 32" 4k hdr10 240hz glossy variant for my desk though!

  • @interceptor001
    @interceptor0013 күн бұрын

    To be honest the 32GS95UE/X is not that bad but yes colors are better on any QD-OLED. I just can not get over the bad coating applied to them. That "glossy" coating is just so flimsy not useable for everyday use. But apart from that QD-OLED is better apart from VRR Flicker.

  • @AlexTuduran
    @AlexTuduran3 күн бұрын

    Let's put it this way: You hate matte finishing, I hate glossy finishing. Give or take.

  • @Mr.DennyB
    @Mr.DennyB3 күн бұрын

    if they fix the ambient light issue with qd-oled technology and the display stays fully black no matter the lighting, then i think it's over for woled

  • @TheOfficial_AW
    @TheOfficial_AW3 күн бұрын

    I got the dual mode 480hz and I love it. I’m coming from a 240hz 1440p omen monitor

  • @chai817

    @chai817

    2 күн бұрын

    How’s the quality on the 480hz mode

  • @TheOfficial_AW

    @TheOfficial_AW

    2 күн бұрын

    @@chai817 Honestly, if you turn up the sharpening, it doesn’t look half bad. I’ve played multiple games and it’s hit or miss. Call of duty is fine, Apex is a little more rough, but Frag Punk and valorant are perfectly fine

  • @crowntotheundergroud
    @crowntotheundergroud3 күн бұрын

    The raised blacks with ambient light sucks, but qd-oled can ultimately achieve the best picture, so i prefer it.

  • @Renverse64
    @Renverse643 күн бұрын

    your cats are amazing

  • @BulleTinY0uRHeaD

    @BulleTinY0uRHeaD

    3 күн бұрын

    Yes! Someone should have said that xD

  • @ArseniTecH-vm1fg
    @ArseniTecH-vm1fg3 күн бұрын

    I have lg woled, and I use one cuz qd oled gave me severe eye strain and headache. Lg had matte that dissipate light evenly for human eye. You lose like 15% sharpness, but for work is not an issue. Without matte you guys will get instant eye strain. Pixel cleaning is AUTO. also g gsync must be used with 100% brightness or you get some headache. Game quality is the same as qd oled. But qd oled 32 inch is sharp as Mac book pro. It’s ASUS oled text is RAZER SHARP, IF YOU GET ONE MAKE SURE DISABLE GSYNC or you will get instant eye strain😊

  • @fleckski
    @fleckski3 күн бұрын

    Can't wait for you to review the samsung 360hz g6

  • @marcel1463
    @marcel14633 күн бұрын

    I just bought the Sony A80L with LG WOLED panel and it's great even though i saw the Sony A95L besides with QDOLED, the price increase is just not worth it in my opinion. Just buy a display with LG OLED it's fine.

  • @Dr.BaLLista
    @Dr.BaLLista3 күн бұрын

    Every manufacturer should make monitors like tvs.

  • @andressanchez9818
    @andressanchez98183 күн бұрын

    I have the 32GS95UE, love the Matte screen :)

  • @bb2status
    @bb2status3 күн бұрын

    I'll never buy a QD-OLED panel. Those raised black levels with ambient light looks like crap. WOLED FTW

  • @Oscar-id8rc
    @Oscar-id8rc3 күн бұрын

    I think that while it would be better for the image to get rid of the white subpixel, it is still neccessary to prevent burn in. QD Oleds burn in is still a thing. Look at Tim video from hardware unboxed and Rtings testing. Oled tech is still not durable enough to get rid of the white subpixel in my opinión. Just do some research and you'll see people with CX and C1 still rocking their screens without any burn in after several years

  • @Savitarax
    @Savitarax4 күн бұрын

    With perfect contrast/motion and good enough brightness on both. The only thing left is COLOR. Which QD-OLED takes easily.

  • @ameliabuns4058

    @ameliabuns4058

    4 күн бұрын

    You forgot about the lack of polarizer on the qd OLED, woled has way better contrast in anything but a pitch black room, then it’s equal, which is the main point of OLED

  • @Savitarax

    @Savitarax

    3 күн бұрын

    @@ameliabuns4058 it just has to be a room with no DIRECT light shining on the display. I have a room with a warm bright light directly above but ever so slightly behind the QD-oled i have and it's PITCH black like my LG. The lack of a polarizer only matters when the light directly interferes with the pixels not indirectly.

  • @tylerstirling2843

    @tylerstirling2843

    3 күн бұрын

    @@ameliabuns4058I went back to Woled for this very reason. Colors are nice but lifted blacks are an absolute no go.

  • @ccsstorm
    @ccsstorm4 күн бұрын

    Woled is lower brightness in any other scenarios minus white screen. qd oled has higher brightness when there are colors, woled brightness plumets in real life scenario.

  • @crowntotheundergroud

    @crowntotheundergroud

    3 күн бұрын

    Yes so qd oled is actually 3-4 times brighter

  • @ArseniTecH-vm1fg

    @ArseniTecH-vm1fg

    3 күн бұрын

    Not at all, turn gsync and hdr and you get sustained 600 nits brightness, have have both, and they look about the same

  • @cemsengul16
    @cemsengul163 күн бұрын

    If only LG would sell me a desktop monitor that looks as good as my G3 I would buy it without hesitation. LG really doesn't understand how much people love their glossy coating.

  • @ArseniTecH-vm1fg

    @ArseniTecH-vm1fg

    3 күн бұрын

    I returned ASUS within 3 days cuz it would strain my eyes like crazy, but picture was so o good. Then I got lg 32 oled, and magic, 000 eye strain even with 100% brightness, even 16 hours of gaming, wow! Mate screen doesn’t let blue light hit ur eyes directly, so I can use it forever😊. With Asus I wanted to vomit in 5 min of gaming.

  • @BulleTinY0uRHeaD

    @BulleTinY0uRHeaD

    3 күн бұрын

    @@ArseniTecH-vm1fg which Asus did you return? PG32UCDM?

  • @amg4160
    @amg41604 күн бұрын

    AW2725DF or XG27AQDMG?

  • @DoomGuy148.

    @DoomGuy148.

    3 күн бұрын

    Both are good though arguably Alienware is better because of insane 360hz refresh rate. If the price is the same get Alienware if Asus sells considerably cheaper get that instead.

  • @rsg7221
    @rsg72214 күн бұрын

    The matte coating is great if you do both office work and gaming. Text clarity is better.

  • @thicklips

    @thicklips

    4 күн бұрын

    Hardware antialiasing

  • @5ean5ean22

    @5ean5ean22

    4 күн бұрын

    Cope

  • @enzopied3015

    @enzopied3015

    3 күн бұрын

    @5ean5ean22 sounds like you're the one coping friend, as you got triggered off his comment

  • @theunpredictableduck
    @theunpredictableduck3 күн бұрын

    2:17 woopsidoodle

  • @jonathanmoore121
    @jonathanmoore1214 күн бұрын

    You have a lion cub on your entertainment system.

  • @seannguyen2135
    @seannguyen21353 күн бұрын

    me when I bought my monitor yesterday

  • @IdeoDLaw
    @IdeoDLaw4 күн бұрын

    atleast woled doesnt hurt your eyes like qd-oled that emits way to much blue light

  • @Savitarax

    @Savitarax

    4 күн бұрын

    It’s not blue light, it’s saturation. Blue light was a huge myth for years that it hurts your eyes. Just try cranking up digital vibrancy and you’ll see what I mean. Even if you turn on “blue light filter modes” on monitors. If the colors are still very saturated it will still hurt.

  • @patrikmedia

    @patrikmedia

    4 күн бұрын

    @@Savitarax this doesn't matter in this comparison. both QD and WOLED look great in SDR, the difference in saturation is absolutely minimal, even less so after calibration. it takes a higher brightness where QD starts to overshadow WOLED in terms of color saturation, but that's not the mode most people use the monitor for when reading text etc. pixel layout is what causes the eye strain, because there is a green and purple tint on text that is very irritating (QD). not really an issue on these current gen RGWB layout used on WOLEDs and thats why text clarity it's nearly identical to LCDs with same ppi.

  • @GGP337

    @GGP337

    3 күн бұрын

    @@patrikmedia colour saturation is a big difference imo, colours exist on my monitor that don't exist on my c2, especially reds.

  • @patrikmedia

    @patrikmedia

    3 күн бұрын

    @@GGP337 the C2 uses an older gen panel compared to this LG monitor and it can vary A LOT depending on what preset you use. calibrated both QD and WOLED look pretty much identical. it's only the extremes where you start noticing differences (higher brightness 200+ nits, wide gamuts, etc)

  • @DoomGuy148.

    @DoomGuy148.

    3 күн бұрын

    My Alienware 27" qd-oled doesn't hurt eyes one bit. Genetic failures with trash eyes and low T are the ones at risk.

  • @ALFGamingTV
    @ALFGamingTV3 күн бұрын

    i like your sense of humour :)

  • @Hyperfocus024
    @Hyperfocus0243 күн бұрын

    32GS95UE

  • @iikatinggangsengii2471
    @iikatinggangsengii24713 күн бұрын

    ask them, all i can say w my phone and laptop its far from what i saw

  • @MakeSh00t
    @MakeSh00t3 күн бұрын

    just test new g6 g8 oled new monitors and compare ...

  • @patrikmedia

    @patrikmedia

    3 күн бұрын

    yep I'd be super stoked to see a close up comparison of QD-OLED glossy vs matte and how that affects clarity. currently it's hard to compare with WOLED since current gen we only have matte as an option, these is no glossy version available that uses the same panel/ppi

  • @cyberneticorganism.

    @cyberneticorganism.

    3 күн бұрын

    @@patrikmedia It's also a shame only Asus & LG use the panels, there are no other brands (as far as i know) that use them. For the 32-inch 4K models the Asus is not in stock over here (the Netherlands), it's a disaster. So i can only choose LG, or LG ;-) They also took a wrong turn with that fan. But i am still on the WOLED side personally.

  • @patrikmedia

    @patrikmedia

    3 күн бұрын

    @@cyberneticorganism. there are other models but in the Asian markets. and the Asus you're referring to didn't even release yet, there are no reviews on KZread either. might have mistaken it with the QD version Asus. The dual mode one using this LG panel is only available in LGs monitor right now, like you said. also, no idea when the Asus version will launch... there's also a 1440p 480hz one releasing this summer, but still no clue when actually. seems like they postponed the launch for both models. EDIT: maybe (but very unlikely) they saw community feedback and switched over to glossy coating, same as that recent 1440p 240hz WOLED relaunch. would be great, even tho that coating is worse than what they use on LG tvs.

  • @cyberneticorganism.

    @cyberneticorganism.

    3 күн бұрын

    @@patrikmedia Ah yeah you are right, i was referring to the PG32UCDM, but that's an QD-OLED. It's the PG34WCDM that is WOLED. I am only interested myself in the 4K 32-inch, or Ultrawide 34-inch (WOLED). Or 5K20 Ultrawides next year... I am fine with matt coating i think so. Only i do like the design of Asus a lot, and the passive cooling as well.

  • @patrikmedia

    @patrikmedia

    3 күн бұрын

    @@cyberneticorganism. I personally like Asus for their features but dislike the design unfortunately lol I'm sure their version will be the better compared to LG, but curious to see how the pricing will be. Got mine fairly cheap, not expecting the Asus to less for anything below 1.4-1.5k usd tbh

  • @Pillokun
    @Pillokun3 күн бұрын

    Don't use woleds because the have the dirty gray issue. Ie artefacts are present when it displays gray or darker shades. Super obvious if u use windows dark mode.

  • @patrikmedia

    @patrikmedia

    3 күн бұрын

    thats the coatings fault not WOLED. LG TVs don't have that grainy appearance on dark solid shades of color.

  • @Pillokun

    @Pillokun

    3 күн бұрын

    @@patrikmedia nope, it is not because of the coating, u literally see darker horizontal lines then the gray/dark shades as if u see "scan lines" of a crt, but thicker.

  • @patrikmedia

    @patrikmedia

    3 күн бұрын

    @@Pillokun no you dont, the matte LG has some grain to it (randomized, feels like a texture) meanwhile an LG TV looks very clean which uses glossy. idk what panel you look at but neither of those two have scan lines.

  • @Pillokun

    @Pillokun

    2 күн бұрын

    @@patrikmedia the dirty gray issue is caused by the woled panels itself not he coating. On my lg and asus both were displaying artefacts like horizontal lines, they both went back to the store. Funny is nobody talked about the dirty gray issue and I only saw the issue when I was reading other peoples review of the monitors on the entailers review section to the monitors the issues seems to be voltage related according to some people and has nothing to do with the matte coating. when a monitor reviewer had a Premier and was in the chat I brought it up with him, and his defence was, va has dirty gray issues too so I dont focus that much on it. Connor, does not even bring it up at all, and Tim mentioned it max three times in a very passing by manner so to speak. Reviewers are as always full of bs, either they focus on wrong issues or just want to sell so to speak.

  • @patrikmedia

    @patrikmedia

    2 күн бұрын

    @@Pillokun idk man, my WOLED tv looks just as clear as QD with glossy coating. that grainy look only is visible on the matte LG WOLED. just reporting what I see in front of my eyes right now.

  • @ArgirisBothos
    @ArgirisBothos3 күн бұрын

    What are u talking about?😂

  • @Captain-Chats
    @Captain-Chats2 күн бұрын

    Really 🤣🤣 I love my LG OLED

  • @killa2142xx
    @killa2142xx3 күн бұрын

    The biggest problem with the "Woled" white pixel is chrominance overshoot. It causes banding in dark scenes. My 27GR95QE has it everywhere. Its so bad im returning it. Also vertical banding is very bad. The VRR flicker is bad as well on the 27GR95QE. So bascialy in dark games like RE4, you see vertical banding, dark color banding and vrr flickering at the same time.

  • @IscAst4
    @IscAst44 күн бұрын

    😮

  • @jannerummukainen1956
    @jannerummukainen19564 күн бұрын

    First!😊

  • @francoiscolin6692
    @francoiscolin66923 күн бұрын

    Oled sucks, wether it's LG, Asus or something else. Burning is the redflag.

  • @GregoryCunningham

    @GregoryCunningham

    3 күн бұрын

    Burning is definitely a red flag, some might even consider it dangerous. Burn in on the other hand is handled very well by most OLED’s, especially on LG’s.

Келесі