Al-Jazeera talking about democracy is most ironic about this documentary.

@astupiddvdcase

Жыл бұрын

Its not. Everyone who works for al jazeera is university educated and probably lives in a democracy cause most of the networks audience is westerners hence why its al jazeera english. But yeah shit video, everyone knows parliamentary democracies like britain and australia elects party leaders to be pm

@nationalist7347

Жыл бұрын

@@astupiddvdcase but who is funding it a non democratic theocracy to spread propaganda

@mohamedismail6273

Жыл бұрын

Pajeet my son

@breezemont1161

Жыл бұрын

@derzzsh Mullah

@breezemont1161

Жыл бұрын

@@mohamedismail6273 Abdool my child

*Simple answer. Parliamentary system vs. Presidential system.*

This is what happens when a state sponsored channels of a country that doesn't have any form of democracy, makes a 'report' on an electoral process they have so little experience, perspective or knowledge of to even realize why and for what these differences exist.

@beniaminorzechowski9913

Жыл бұрын

I agree.

@cinefile0075

Жыл бұрын

Exactly same with qatar's propaganda channel Al jazira

@user-of8pu6wr3n

Жыл бұрын

👍🏻

@massalleh5255

Жыл бұрын

@@cinefile0075 Or WION

@quatreunhuit

Жыл бұрын

@@cinefile0075 Aj+ *is* Al Jazeera

It’s not a presidential system..it’s mostly about party and ideology

@misterbig9025

Жыл бұрын

The French got rid of their king many years ago!

@markjennings2605

8 ай бұрын

Yes of course, like Truss and Kwarteng wiping £40 billion off the UK economy within days of her premiership. Why is Truss not in prison for treason?

Honestly, if the UK Conservatives had any spine there'd be a vote of non confidence and a general election

@William26002

Жыл бұрын

Unfortunately, they only care about themselves

All of these Americans in the comment section who don't understand how a parliamentary system works. We never vote for a prime minister, we vote for our local MP and the party with the most seats in the house has its leader appointed as the PM.

@faustsin9366

Жыл бұрын

Thanks mate, also that sounds very stupid effectively they can put anyone up there.

@khankrum1

Ай бұрын

@@faustsin9366 The Prime Minister serves the CROWN, NOT Parliament and certainly NOT you or I !

Whiter, richer and older. To the surprise of absolutely no one.

@TheYogesh7777

Жыл бұрын

Rishi Sunak is white??? Wtf.

@TheYogesh7777

Жыл бұрын

He is 42 years old. How young do you want????😂😂😂

@cloroxbleach2520

Жыл бұрын

@@TheYogesh7777 that was in reference to the Tory party members.

@TheYogesh7777

Жыл бұрын

@@cloroxbleach2520 tory members are elected by people. Go back to school.

@preuser

Жыл бұрын

Without profits from Vaccination)

I think people in the Uk should be able to directly vote for their leaders without MPs being in the way. it will make things fairer and allow the people to have a direct say in who their leader should be.

@monarchist1838

Жыл бұрын

Our MPs work on our behalf. Our system works. The Westminster model has been replicated across the planet. Including the USA. Any electoral reform can only be enacted from the Conservatives or Labour. Neither will. Countless Labour PMs have resigned and succeeded without general elections. As early as 2007 in Westminster and Wales in 2018. Few on the left complained then.

@exlaugh

Жыл бұрын

🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ learn more about our politics

@nattynorth

Жыл бұрын

honestly, the system we have looks bad but practically it is really good. It does helps stop bad leaders staying for longer than they would've done under a presidential system. If we had trump he probably would have been forced out quite early

@HVACSoldier

Жыл бұрын

@@nattynorth Trump OR Hillary would’ve been forced out. Heck, they probably wouldn’t be anywhere NEAR the leadership of either party, in a Parliamentary system.

@user-zy8cy6hn6o

Жыл бұрын

@@HVACSoldier it's 2022 who cares about Hillary anymore

Same thing happened in Malaysia. The last general election is 2018 , but we had 3 different prime minister and 3 different cabinet in just 4 years. Because we had the same parlimentary system with the UK

@jingbot1071

Жыл бұрын

Hopefully the outcome will be the same, too.

@yimmuy

Жыл бұрын

we have the same UK parliamentary system but our Prime Ministers is like a dictator so we didn’t change for 8 years. (in September we change PM once because of term limit problem but now we back to same person again because court said our pm is not at term limit , yea the constitution said PM can only have limit of 8 years but court said his term start in 2017 not 2014 when our PM stage a military coup) in the past when we have a democratically elected prime minister we just have same problem but most is ending with a stupid military coup. Hi from your northern neighbor, Thailand

@stoodmuffinpersonal3144

Жыл бұрын

Canada's system has similar flaws

@atomicshadow6526

Жыл бұрын

@@stoodmuffinpersonal3144 every single Commonwealth country mostly taken Bristish Westminster parliamentary..

@atomicshadow6526

Жыл бұрын

fyi, its not so much similar..Malaysia government change 3times in only 1 General Election, and that is not Good Politics but like a Coup instead.. changing PM between the party are normal, since the people voted for the party not the leaders

I for one and shocked that a country with no constitution and an unleclected monarch as the head of state doesn't have a democratic system

Democracy are not broken because people vote for party not the leaders, therefore the party has the right to chose or drop its PM candidate whatever they want..

Britain is a parliamentary democracy. People chose their representative not prime ministers. Any one of those representative can become prime minister.

You don't vote for the prime minister in uk, you vote for the MPs who then can choose the prime minister without your input. The UK's parliamentary democracy is only a "democracy" in the same way that the democractic republic of north korea is a "democracy"

@xanderx2523

Жыл бұрын

You do know that democracy is a broad term, right? A managed democracy, a representative democracy and a direct democracy are all different forms of democracy but at the end off the day they're all democracies. As long as people can vote it's a democracy.

@JoaoGabriel-iy4lm

Жыл бұрын

China has the same system lol

@bennypika3575

Жыл бұрын

@@joes9129 it is pretty simialr. Only difference is European is ahead of this colonial things and North Korea weren't so it impact Korea harder (as people don't resist this enough)

@dopaminedreams1122

Жыл бұрын

@@bennypika3575 your a clown for even saying that, lmao how insane to compare the two, so disrespectful too

@bennypika3575

Жыл бұрын

@@dopaminedreams1122 no shit you're too busy looking at city and cloth style

There once was a Qatari who founded Al Jazeera they asked and questioned law and rule when in their country it's a monarchy

"And that is something that simply changing the prime minister is not going to fix." These articles always fall short to provide solutions when coming to this point. If that's not going to fix it, what will?

@-BUILT_LIKE_A_BAG_OF_MILK

Жыл бұрын

The public have no choice in who they are voting for...that's a weak "Democracy". To call THIS a Democracy is far reaching. Its a draconian attempt at it & its failing miserably, however it won't be changing due to the masses not having enough solidarity to force a change. They would rather bicker over petty nonsense & "party" rivalries rather than what is all round best for the nation as a whole. Which would then take me to one of the flaws of a "democracy"...having every man & his dog voting for the future of an entire nation based off of their average knowledge (or lack thereof) is a dangerous leap of faith when a parliament is filled with hundreds of people claiming they know what's best for the country, yet bickering over what party to represent. Does such surface value disagreements really make for a parliament of people who truly have the nations best interests at heart? Or merely a career ladder they wish to climb? It's average intelligence people deciding they are experts when in fact would it not make more sense to have less parliament members who are genuine experts in their chosen field to run those aspects? Or to continue to have a merry go round of lesser people decide the fate? Furthermore when the citizens suffer or a disaster happens the individuals who made that call can be safe in the knowledge they will NEVER be held accountable for that decision & their life continues as normal, they may even be allowed another attempt in the future. Knowing the line of people lining up like hyenas behind them will fall to the same fate as they quarrel like children they leave the post unscathed, and join again at the back of the line to try again. When serving in public office you should dedicate yourself to it with enough respect to the position & the responsibility to where, if you make a terrible call on something which is damaging to the nation you shall retire from public office immediately to pass the role onto the whomever is best educated on that subject, not someone who will play party politics for individual or "party" games. You should also be made to compensate financially a majority portion of any finances gained during the failed attempt at running the government, It's also not very democratic to have a house of Lords who can decide if something is important to the general public & whether or not the publics concerns are worth addressing. If the public are in a strong agreement over an issue & government fails or refuses to rectify this issue swiftly with immediate effect then again, it should retire as it is refusing to act on the general rhetoric of the citizens.

No it isn’t broken. It’s the UK system of governance and democracy and no one takes to the streets to protest the outcome.

This is good. Informative series are good intiatives

UK has this nonsense, US has Electoral College, Senate, gerrymandering, Dem/Rep duopoly... ☹️👎

@chalgoode6449

Жыл бұрын

The Anglo-Saxons are just KILLING it, I tell ya! WORLDWIDE!

@misterbig9025

Жыл бұрын

Sloppy Joe yeah

@I2AmUS

Жыл бұрын

America sucks too! ...hanging chads, cheaters, voter suppression, lying politicians... God bless America! 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡😂🤢😂😂

@fercanche2279

Жыл бұрын

Liberal "democracies" are just companies playing dress-up and deciding which colour should the oppression wear for the next period.

@chalgoode6449

Жыл бұрын

@@fercanche2279 The Torries are literally a conservative party. Do your homework before spewing nonsense about "liberal" this or "conservative" that.

The UK system is a constitutional Monarchy!

Because it's a parliamentary state, not presidential one, all the americans who think parliamentary democracy is perfect you now have the UK as example on how parliamentary democracy can go wrong.

UK should copy the MMPR of Germany with 5% electoral threshold.

A King without Election... A new PM Without Election... It's all about Democracy

@littledudefromacrossthestr5755

Жыл бұрын

No

@I2AmUS

Жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@misterbig9025

Жыл бұрын

Democracy = waste of money....Only to come up with incompetent quitting chief executive

Honestly from the outside looking in it looks worse than it actually is. It's actually a good system for preventing bad leaders from staying too long and I wish this vids had objectively gone over the pros and cons of the system.

@thedarthlord7724

Жыл бұрын

Says the guy who watches cartoons

@mocktubelol3355

Жыл бұрын

The point you may be missing isn't the vote of no confidence, it is the part where they can simply replace the publicly voted in PM with their own internally chosen one, instead of going back to the public for a proper vote.

@abz2000123

Жыл бұрын

Problem is that it doesn't go back to the representatives of the people at large, and that the party that's come to power can change faces for people to throw eggs at -with zero ability to fix the actual problem. If the vote had gone back to the representatives of the people at large they could have re-chosen their leader with lower effort and cost. People directly removing the leader can make un-necessary room for constant conspiracy and paranoia, but a non-partisan vote by all mps would make some sense - and people could change their mp if things started to go corrupt.

@markjennings2605

8 ай бұрын

Not a bad system? Johnson a con man gets into power, followed by Truss who lasts a few weeks and tanks the economy. Followed by Sunak who tanks the UK's green pledges. You are joking,right?

In America 🇺🇸 you have an election for a President and Vice President but here in Britain 🇬🇧 people just become prime minister without the public giving them a single vote.

@rainbowkitten8990

Жыл бұрын

We have our general election in a few years but we need one NOW. It is so unfair

@jamesthepassionateyoutuber9059

Жыл бұрын

@@rainbowkitten8990 also in general elections in the U.K. you don’t vote for the prime minister, you are only allowed to vote for the party! Like what if you like the party but not the person wanting to be prime minister.

@jfrd-pw4hk

Жыл бұрын

1. Presidential systems produce the most number of dictators. Popularly mandated by ignorant, gullible majorities. 2. You can't kick out a shit president in the middle of a term. Impeachment is a straight-up time waster.

@pikachuthunderbolt3919

8 ай бұрын

Election in USA are crazy

He is brown and 42 years old. How young do you want???😂😂😂

@William26002

Жыл бұрын

Please educate yourself on British politics. By members of the Tory party he is talking about people who are normal non-MP citizens who pay to be a member of the Tory party. Rishi is just one man, believe it or not he is the first non white prime minister so if you could understand British politics before leaving this comment, you would understand that Tory party members doesn’t just refer to Sunak.

@TheYogesh7777

Жыл бұрын

@@William26002 well he is prime minister.

@William26002

Жыл бұрын

@@TheYogesh7777 you need to understand British politics again bro. The prime minister isn’t like this supreme god that makes all the decisions. The prime minister is the leader of the party where the most people voted for that party members MP for their constituency. If I was living in Kent and I voted for the Labour candidate for MP of Kent and most of the constituencies had voted Labour then the leader of the Labour Party (keir starmer) would become prime minister. Being prime minister is the leader of the victorious party. Simple. He is one member of the Tory party out of 172000, even if he is prime minister or not.

Al Jazeera should as Malaysia also. They too, have a very complicated politics, stemmed from British Parliamentary system.

America is the same way

@chrisbacos

Жыл бұрын

Exactly. When I heard a decline in voter turnout and hard to get past the two major parties I thought "sound familiar?"

@Lottoboi100

Жыл бұрын

As an American this is not true we have some integrity at least

@misterbig9025

Жыл бұрын

How did Americans come up with clumsy sloppy Joe?

@Lottoboi100

Жыл бұрын

@@misterbig9025 nobody wanted evil Donald Trump sometimes you got to pick your poison

@webcelt

Жыл бұрын

That's not at all how it woks in America. The president isn't the leader of the majority party in Congress, but gets elected separately, and therefore can't be removed when the majority party picks a new leader. Presidents don't get officially appointed by a constitutional monarch or figurehead president, and they can't call new elections just whenever they think their party will win. The significant similarity is the British House of Commons and the US House of Representatives members are elected by district rather than proportionately, so the party with the most votes doesn't always get the most seats in either country.

i from Malaysia and we also adopt the same system as UK. citizen do not choose the pm but the party. and party that won the election will choose the pm which gained majority of the MP elected. now the parliament does not dissolve, so the MP got the right to choose the PM themself. nothing wrong with democracy is USA president election fair ? as i know it is winners take all from a state ...

Classic AJ+… can’t even do math properly

Considering the UK system is safer and creates less nazis compared to Republican models, not sure how it can be described as broken.

So the American system is superior. LOLOL 🤣🤣🤣

Time changes and the styles also change.

The prime minister is the representative of the king. He rules the country on behalf of the king. In that case there is no alternative. Britain has bear to that.

This is a very disingenious take on the Westminster system of goverment. A system I think works a heck of alot better than the US system. For a start you cannot veiw the Prime Minister in the same light as the president. The Westminster system gives PARTIES power not INDAVIDUALS. The Prime Minister is simply the person the party chooses to be their figurehead, hence why it can change mid-term if the leader is not representative of the party vision. Second the Pirme Minister still needs to call the ecltion before a certain date (the fact you left that out is quite the ommision). The fact is, if the 5 year term was still in place the election wouldn't happen tommorow anyway. You do adress some issues with the UK, like the 1st past the post system and the fact the PM can call an election at an opertune time and the fact that electorates can result in results un-reflective of the popular vote. However, what you choose to focus on was the fact that people are angry that the party THEY elected in 2019 has internal politics. WOW who would of thought.

@gerryburntwood9617

Жыл бұрын

We need proportional representation!

@lewa3910

Жыл бұрын

That'sbullshit

@aleenaprasannan2146

Жыл бұрын

@@lewa3910 How? That's a system put in place so one individual cannot do whatever they want and hijack the system and establish dictatorship.

So true

I propose blind voting. People should vote for policy changes and government priorities put forward in a manifesto. Not for people. It should be mandatory to implement any policy receiving over 70% support. Mandatory to debate any policy receiving over 50% vote. The party with the most policy supporting votes should take overall control of the house and elect a leader.

Okay, you are making this out to seem way more controversial than it is. There was a general election and the conservatives won, that gives them the right to choose the prime minister amongst its ministers and membership. And so long as they have that majority, there isn't anything wrong with them swapping prime ministers, and not giving the wider electorate a choice in that matter. In the same way that when the president dies we have a messy line of succession. You don't just have a snap general election. At the end of the day, the electorate gave the conservatives their majority with the expectation that those minister would not be up for election for another five years, how and who those ministers then decide to elect as their prime minister is a separate discussion. Given how easily a prime minister can lose the confidence of their party, could you imagine the genuine chaos if every time that happened there was a general election!?

@SormonAusPol

Жыл бұрын

Heck, the fact that the party allowed its non-elected members to vote over just the ones in parliment is actually quite democratic.

@Flimstudios5

Жыл бұрын

@@SormonAusPol I would prefer to vote without being tied to a party. I think this is very dated system. general elections should be able to happen wether you are apart of a party or not.

@SormonAusPol

Жыл бұрын

@@Flimstudios5 You do vote though, thats what the election is. You give you vote to a party to represent the country. That party has a leader which mainly acts as a figure for the party's agenda. If you want to vote directly for the Prime Minister then you will need to join the ruling party which can be easily done for $25 a year.

Firstly we need proportional representation rather than first past the post. Secondly we need a system in place where the people can deselect their leader. Thirdly, there should be some laws that prevent power not to be abused. E.g. scraping 5 year general election period.

What's the difference between a MP and party member?

@MrMrMuhummad

Жыл бұрын

MP has been voted for by his or hers electorate.

@ozgoldebronokia8210

Жыл бұрын

An MP is (always) a party member but a party member is not certainly an MP.

every PM in the past came thru the same system. in the westminster system, people elect MPs, and the MPs choose a PM.

When MPs are elected by the people of Britain it doesn't make a difference electing Prime minister by the same MPs.There is no wrong in having elected Mr.Sunak as Prime minister of Britain by Tory party MPs. Mr.Sunak appears very smart and brilliant at the helm of affairs, particularly, when he handles the British parliament.Congratulations to Mr.Sunak👏👍

Wow...that's almost as weird as the monarchy.

If voting made any difference they wouldn’t let you do it .

We can call him out for being a posh Tory without the racism, though. Really frustrating to see all those in his own party being mad cause he's brown

Yes it is,!

POLITICS MANIPULATED ‼️ THE WORTS SCENARY IN UK

No we live in a parliamentary system no one ever votes for the prime minster

I don't think Qatari sponsored media has the authority to talk about democracy

@cikicikibumbum259

Жыл бұрын

why not? Like western medias which are the messenger of rioters in foreign country, but hate riot in front of their offices.

At 1.39 min AL jaazera he is 42 yrs old...Al Jazeera 🤮

I'm so gutted we'll never get to see Liz Truss fight a general election campaign. That would've been the closest to seeing a candidate trying for a job interview and us the public for once taking the position of the employer.

Election 🤕

well funded by a very democratic country

so basically MP is an position that is just like American's fillerbuster system

Still beats thw Electoral College.

Whose next?

And they give lectures to other countries

I am saddened that more people are not watching this as voter's. There in layes the problem. People are sick of the constant lies and misinformation and have just become disinterested However hope is on the horizon in the form of bad time's for all but the super rich. People will get pourer including the middle class and government will have no tools left to deceive the voter . Can you smell the air it's the wind of change approaching.

Woo

Democracy?

Aj+ Qatari owned company talking about elections and democracy lol . Learn what a parliamentary system is . People vote for MPs and then they vote for the PM

Uk seems over complicated

Is it even a democracy than?

Tomorrow’s World Relationships A perfect match? A loving family? Happy children? The pressures of today’s world create a grim reality where successful and lasting relationships are something of a fantasy. We cannot rely on the experience of elders since they lived in a very different world, so we have to find how to create meaningful and sustainable partnerships today. The key word in this search is connectedness, or rather, interconnectedness. Because the world is changing at an accelerating pace, it is pointless to compare today’s relationships to those of our parents, or even to relationships of people a decade or two older than us. Each year, the world becomes increasingly connected, and a crisis in one place quickly spreads to the rest of the world. On the personal level, too, things today are very different from what they were a decade ago. We have moved from fast food to fast relationships, and brief has become our permanent state of being. To cope with the growing uncertainty and find direction in the emerging chaos, we need to understand where we are going. We are headed toward total connectedness and interdependence. It is an irreversible process. The more connected we become, the more dependent on each other we become, as well. Soon, we will realize that anything that hurts others hurts me, too, and there is nothing I can do to break my ties with the world. In order to cope successfully with our interconnected future, we must change the nature of our ties from abusive and oppressive to supportive and embracing. Since we already broadcast our thoughts, words, and actions to the entire world, we might as well broadcast positive thoughts, words, and actions, and help improve the world for ourselves and others. In a world that is connected positively, the family is the basic unit of connection. A reality where humanity is a mass of isolated individuals is unsustainable because there will be no connections between people and society will disintegrate just as any organism disintegrates into the smallest elements when it dies. Therefore, the family will be the basic unit where people cultivate positive connections. Since people are becoming increasingly individualistic, the family will be the place where people learn to embrace diversity rather than fight against people who hold different views. People will learn that just as our body exists thanks to different cells and organs working together for the sake of the body, different people who work together for the sake of the family enable the success of the family. From the family unit, people will take their lessons to the community, from the community to the city, from the city to the state, to the country, and finally to the entire world. The key, therefore, to successful relationships in tomorrow’s world, lies not only in connections, but in connections between different people for a common goal, where the differences between them ensure their success and make their mutual dependence imperative, and even welcome.

Tell your saudi arabia and UAE about this.

What an achievement for Rishi. Last man standing. It's like picking teams at school and someone has to choose the last kid, although it wasn't a choice.

@misterbig9025

Жыл бұрын

Can he last 45 days?

@Sinaeb

Жыл бұрын

@@misterbig9025 Can he outlast a peeled apple?

Not surprising?

yes

How do you like that democracy? ....

Is this Aljazeera?

if there will be a vote Sunnak has no chance.

Yes ... What of it?

money Talk's lol"

Sunak would never have become prime minister on public votes. It reminds me of that snivelling Ed Milliband that lost a lot of labour voters, plus an election.

Keep proportional representation

Prime Minister does not equal President! The Prime Minister of UK is appointed by the Monarch. The monarch by convention appoints the leader of the political party that has confidence of the House of Commons and can guarantee the passage of supply bills.

@vitocorleone7040

Жыл бұрын

@Goose Green you are living in a royal fantasy, the King has little to zero power to appoint a new PM, if he used any influence it would backfire massively on the monarchy.

Sure has.

NO it is not stop click baiting

Can you do a video on how the UK government suppressed the Celtic languages

@littledudefromacrossthestr5755

Жыл бұрын

Huh

@rkeogh3467

Жыл бұрын

@@littledudefromacrossthestr5755 celtic languages=Irish,Welsh,breton,Scottish gaelic,cornish and manx

@littledudefromacrossthestr5755

Жыл бұрын

@@rkeogh3467 ok

Both of our systems suck and need a modern overhaul.

Truss me , everyone knows her and that lettuce now

i hate that "modern day britain" term.. you mean the britain of the last 20 years?

Get over it!😊

*Oh boy, Al Jazeera is this JEALOUS of a Hindu governing a G7 nation!* 😂 🤣 😂 🤣

It's a fundamental misconception that the Prime Minister of the UK ought to be elected. The Prime Minister is the leader of the party asked to form government by the King. The leader of the party is elected as an MP, just like the rest of party MPs are. The Prime Minister is appointed by the King, by virtue of being the leader of the ruling party. The public never had a choice of who the Prime Minister is at the ballot box, only the choice of which party they want through the choice of local representatives. That is the nature of the Westminster parliamentary system. It is the same in many countries within the British Commonwealth. Australia had its fair share of musical chair Prime Ministers.

@lilpeanutish

Жыл бұрын

So... you're basically just repeating what the vid already explains at 2:09

@misterbig9025

Жыл бұрын

Andy, such democracy is a waste of resources. Imagine spending the money for education and healthcare.

@fisherfriendman

Жыл бұрын

@@misterbig9025 The price of using flawed people to run systems is waste. It is unfortunately true in any system. The way training of juniors to level up to seniors is to give them opportunity to waste, so that they become more efficient. Same with managing disasters, the only way to get better at them is to have more of them.

"Democracy"

*snoop dogg voice; "WHO?!?!?! "

We don't want him

@megamewtwoy9316

Жыл бұрын

you have to accept , otherwise die of economic collapse💀

@grahamwilkinson3351

Жыл бұрын

@@megamewtwoy9316 Next election he's out and if the conservative party loose enough seats in the local elections a vote of no confidence will get this guy out.

It's at least a little gratifying that after Brexit, Britain is quickly taking the depressing and chaotic slide into irrelevancy that literally everyone but British conservatives saw coming. This is what you voted for. As you sow, so shall you reap.

@misterbig9025

Жыл бұрын

UK is on its way down

What an honor.Prime minister of a welfare state.

I don't like it. It doesn't seem fair or just. 😐

@misterbig9025

Жыл бұрын

What is fair and just for you? Tell me!

@megamewtwoy9316

Жыл бұрын

you have to accept , otherwise die of economic collapse💀

Are not you criticising your king who has appointed as Prime Minister of Britain? It is clearly an internal matter of the Conservative Party that has nothing to do with British democracy. It seems you are more concerned about how Rishi Sunak could be appointed as Prime Minister than than ahout how the present economic crisis of Britain could be overcome. There is none so capable leader among the MPs of the Conservative party as Rishi is to handle the economic cricis.

In parliamentary democracy, you don't vote for a prime minister. You vote for your MPs, who then selects who will be the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister is appointed by the Parliament and the Parliament holds the right to change the Prime Minister at their will. If you do not like the decisions of the parliament, you can replace its members through general election after the validity of the parliament expires.

@gerryburntwood9617

Жыл бұрын

It’s not parliament who chose the PM it’s the political party who is in power, the UK parliament also have members of the opposition, they don’t get to chose the PM, it also relies on Tory members to vote for a selected group of candidates, in this instant three were to stand but two pulled out, so no one actually voted in Rishi Rich, he got to be the PM by default! Get your facts correct!

Conservatives, conserving the rights of rich old white people for years love it 🥰

@DARKREAPER8117

Жыл бұрын

What does being White have to do with it?

The Parliamentary system in a representative Democracy has hard to understand for some I see.

Q (9:29): Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - until they give the jizyah tax willingly while they are humbled. Indeed the word of Quran is followed

UK is a parliamentary democracy. So people choose MP and they choose PM. Same as India. Also, elections are costly affairs, its not desirable to conduct elections if you are going to end up with same MPs and hence same PM.

PLEASE READ THIS COMMENT. THERE REALLY ISN’T MUCH TIME LEFT… There’s no point in putting your faith in politicians. The first general election (that is the public vote for a political party to take office) was held over 300 years ago in 1695. Is the world scene better now than it was? Is the world happier, less stressed, more hopeful for the future, more secure? No, so get yourself liberated from the stranglehold of the system. Follow the example of Jesus, who refused to accept political office. (John 6:15) He taught his disciples to be “no part of the world” and made it clear that they should not take sides in political issues. John 17:14 I have given your word to them, but the world has hated them, because they are no part of the world, just as I am no part of the world. Mark 12:17 Jesus then said: “Pay back Caesar’s things to Caesar, but God’s things to God.” And they were amazed at him. Be loyal to God’s Kingdom, which Jesus spoke of when he said: “This good news of the Kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth.” (Matthew 24:14) As representatives of God’s Kingdom, commissioned to proclaim its coming, remain neutral in the political affairs of all countries, including the one in which you live. 2 Corinthians 5:20 Therefore, we are ambassadors substituting for Christ, as though God were making an appeal through us. As substitutes for Christ, we beg: “Become reconciled to God. Ephesians 6:20 for which I am acting as an ambassador in chains, and that I may speak about it with boldness, as I ought to speak. By remaining neutral, you are able to speak freely to people of all political persuasions about the good news of God’s Kingdom. Try to show by your words and practices that you rely on God’s Kingdom to solve the world’s problems. Psalm 56:11 In God I put my trust; I am not afraid. What can a mere human do to me? By avoiding political divisions, you can be united as an international brotherhood. (Colossians 3:14; 1 Peter 2:17) In contrast, religions that meddle in politics divide their members. 1 Corinthians 1:10 Now I urge you, brothers, through the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you should all speak in agreement and that there should be no divisions among you, but that you may be completely united in the same mind and in the same line of thought.

The english are now lost they are going to be Indians because they have chosen one indian to be thier leader.there are true white english people who can do these work.but now it has gone to the dogs and not to the english.thank you.

In Newfoundland Canada there's a law that if a new Premier(aka Governor) takes office a general election must be called within 1 year of them being sworn in

@misterbig9025

Жыл бұрын

Imagine spending that money for education and healthcare

@mohamedabdourahman9845

Жыл бұрын

@@misterbig9025 Its moreso that Newfoundlanders can either give or take a mandate and at least legitimizes the premier in eyes of voters

@mohamedabdourahman9845

Жыл бұрын

@@misterbig9025 I'm only referring to the election itsself. There are other issues as well don't get me wrong but I thought it would be an interesting fact.

The country having a monarchy is funding a media channel who tells UK has a broken electroal system 🙄. How ironic man !