No video

Imagining the First Dimension

My new book is now available on Amazon!
www.amazon.com/Start-Point-bu...
For more info and other products go to tenthdimension.com .
Twitter: 10thdim
Instagram: 10thdim
Blog: tenthdimension.com/blog
Patreon: patreon.com/10thdim
To read along go to: imaginingthetenthdimension.blo...
Other links from this entry:
imaginingthetenthdimension.blo...
imaginingthetenthdimension.blo...

Пікірлер: 467

  • @Wow-fw9rv
    @Wow-fw9rv4 жыл бұрын

    There are not enough videos of this,I'm addicted

  • @10thdim
    @10thdim12 жыл бұрын

    Haha, just a little fun for my granddaughters, they're 2 and a half and 4, and love the ponies.

  • @asmrtpop2676

    @asmrtpop2676

    3 ай бұрын

    Just found your video looking for a good quick watch on one dimensional worlds-hope your grand daughters are doing well 11 years later! :)

  • @AdvancedGaming4444
    @AdvancedGaming44442 жыл бұрын

    I love how there is music at the beginning of each video it adds extra goodness and that there is no music (not much: if any) behind the dialogue to help focus on the SUBJECT.

  • @10thdim

    @10thdim

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for the compliment!

  • @10thdim
    @10thdim12 жыл бұрын

    Hi Tony, that's interesting! Time is change from state to state. This project encourages us to think about each dimension more as a unique information set, where time is in the "next dimension up" for any dimension, so one dimension after another time moves us towards the timeless whole of the tenth dimension. But we can flip this on its head too, and say that time is the point that moves within any particular dimension, which in a way moves our attention to the "zero" point that starts it all.

  • @PattyMMelt
    @PattyMMelt10 жыл бұрын

    Yeah, the random rainbow dash kinda froze my brain for a second, totally unexpected haha

  • @nyuwishtick

    @nyuwishtick

    4 жыл бұрын

    @1NF3CTED thats a comment 6 years ago he/she mustve been more mature

  • @DyslexicTurtle
    @DyslexicTurtle9 жыл бұрын

    Your heavy midwestern, or light canadian accent is really starting to get to me after watching these videos a billion times.

  • @10thdim
    @10thdim11 жыл бұрын

    I prefer the term "grandpa". My pre-schooler granddaughters love the show so I've watched pretty well every episode with them. So I dropped a little joke in there for them to enjoy some day.

  • @dannyhussain5489
    @dannyhussain5489 Жыл бұрын

    That was so trippy man. I'm both baffled and bewildered but bettered by this brain breaking video

  • @TheInnerCastle
    @TheInnerCastle12 жыл бұрын

    WOW! Look how far you've come! I am so happy for you, you are an amazing fellow. Keep up the great work my friend.

  • @PeppermintSwirl
    @PeppermintSwirl8 жыл бұрын

    0:36 U havin' a giggle m8?

  • @namelessnick9791

    @namelessnick9791

    8 жыл бұрын

    xD

  • @kingoftheorient

    @kingoftheorient

    8 жыл бұрын

    lmao

  • @namelessnick9791

    @namelessnick9791

    8 жыл бұрын

    so is this guy basically a brony?

  • @Titan-ks1xd

    @Titan-ks1xd

    4 жыл бұрын

    Nameless Nick97 nope read his comment

  • @mhesus
    @mhesus8 жыл бұрын

    00:32 - 00:38 My little pony appears for a split second when the dots are placed xD

  • @jackflash128

    @jackflash128

    3 жыл бұрын

    yep once on the right then the left...

  • @DJTriplestar
    @DJTriplestar12 жыл бұрын

    Excellent. Thanks anyhow, I still find all of your video's quite interesting :)

  • @Zoon06
    @Zoon0611 ай бұрын

    I'm gonna come back in a few years and hope my brain decides to retain and understand this bettererer

  • @andykonstandinidis6245
    @andykonstandinidis62459 жыл бұрын

    A line in 1D is distance, which is relative and can't be defined on it's own (i.e. distance between what?). A line in 4D is duration between one space state and another. A line in 7D is the energy difference between space-times.

  • @loriclark505
    @loriclark5053 жыл бұрын

    this is so freaking brilliant

  • @01FNG
    @01FNG11 жыл бұрын

    professor you have crossed the 'line' with that joke

  • @Ghaos
    @Ghaos12 жыл бұрын

    Rob, when you "bend through the dimension above" to get to next higher dimensions, aren't you in essence bending through time? If so, would that make "time" the connection medium for all of the dimensions. It occurred to me today that, a point with time applied would become a line, a line with time applied would become a plane, a pane with time attached would approach a cube, and so forth. Thoughts? ps...I'm a huge fan of your channel, keep up the good work.

  • @goldendragon68
    @goldendragon6812 жыл бұрын

    Rob, what do you think about inter-universal interactions or travel? Would each individual point in the 7/8/9th dimension contain some variable or capacity for interaction with the rest of the 7/8/9th dimension? How do you think two universes with incompatible capacities would react, if at all? Finally, is it possible that there are multiple multiverses, some of which are more linked than others (for example, a multiverse in which it is 100% possible to travel to another universe from this one)?

  • @shadomatch4375
    @shadomatch43759 жыл бұрын

    I just started Geometry 1... I watched this a year before... I have a str8 A in this class thanks to you

  • @idiotuk

    @idiotuk

    3 ай бұрын

    how's it doing 8 years later

  • @twolegmike
    @twolegmike8 жыл бұрын

    did anyone see rainbowdash at the 35 sec mark?

  • @z4n5d64r

    @z4n5d64r

    8 жыл бұрын

    Twice

  • @5000miner

    @5000miner

    8 жыл бұрын

    +twolegmike they trying to make us bronys

  • @twolegmike

    @twolegmike

    8 жыл бұрын

    lol

  • @kingoftheorient

    @kingoftheorient

    8 жыл бұрын

    memes in science

  • @TheGreenFlame

    @TheGreenFlame

    8 жыл бұрын

    Yas I saw her twice

  • @ather5258
    @ather525811 жыл бұрын

    i see the world totally different now.... don't know why i've never wanted to study physics... love this!!!!

  • @ajr993
    @ajr99311 жыл бұрын

    10thdim really has some profound insights

  • @Magikarpador
    @Magikarpador11 жыл бұрын

    So a super genius challenging what we believe is the reality, AND a brony!? You sir, are simply amazing.

  • @Jakp0tt
    @Jakp0tt11 жыл бұрын

    I must say, these videos have all been very interesting to me, and I feel now that I understand what it means to exist outside of the third dimension more than ever, and I know the power behind the number zero. This is an incredibly cool feeling. Despite that immense coolness, the flashing Rainbow Dash that has still managed to make this a solid 20% cooler. SO AWESOME /)^ε^(\

  • @777static777
    @777static7778 жыл бұрын

    LOL people actually say "that's impossible - nothing can exist without width and height"? Following that logic, the third dimension is impossible in the same way, because nothing can be said to have existed within it without there being time (at least one plank-unit off it). All points occupy a space in all dimensions; they just may not be able to move freely in all dimensions. How they can move is determined by how many degrees of freedom they're given.

  • @mattrowlands5751

    @mattrowlands5751

    8 жыл бұрын

    Having dimensions is just a way of explaining our world, they are not necessarily things that can be added or removed.

  • @hypercubemaster2729

    @hypercubemaster2729

    5 жыл бұрын

    Your argument, although somewhat true, does not contradict, but rather reinforces their statement. You see, since all points are within all dimensions, then no point can be without the third dimension as well, which is the very point that those making their 'only 3d' argument are actually trying to convey.

  • @10thdim
    @10thdim12 жыл бұрын

    Right, the more correct word is "orthogonal" but that's basically what orthogonal means - at right angles. Each additional spatial dimension adds a way of moving that was unavailable from the previous ones. The 2D flatlander example is great because it gives us a glimpse of that - a flatlander knows forward/back/left/right, but the next pair of directions that are at right angles to his universe - up/down - are very hard for the flatlander to visualize. Same with us and the extra dimensions.

  • @SupremeTempest
    @SupremeTempest11 жыл бұрын

    Mind-boggling science that makes me want to study physics even more AND ponies? It's official, best vid EVER.

  • @snooze-pilled-blanketcel
    @snooze-pilled-blanketcel10 жыл бұрын

    Reimbowdesh :3

  • @CadetGriffin
    @CadetGriffin10 жыл бұрын

    0:37 I see your POINT. It's Rainbow Dash.

  • @ClashOfClansLucky

    @ClashOfClansLucky

    9 жыл бұрын

    +Jacob Griffin xD

  • @angryman_

    @angryman_

    8 жыл бұрын

    grow up

  • @cameronconaway8879

    @cameronconaway8879

    5 жыл бұрын

    I really don’t get it

  • @Vizzelation
    @Vizzelation12 жыл бұрын

    Hey Rob, can creatures survive in a one- dimensional world? Like how do they eat, bathe, etc.

  • @CalvinHikes
    @CalvinHikes11 жыл бұрын

    Professor (or anyone who can answer): It seems obvious that just a point, or in this case, just a line takes up literally "no" space at all. Neither does the flat land of the 2nd dimension. Nor does the 3D world take up space without the ability to move forward in time. QUESTION; Does anything actually take up any space at all? Is the answer yes, in consideration of all the dimensions being present at once? I'm unsure.

  • @10thdim
    @10thdim12 жыл бұрын

    Just follow the link in the description that says "To read along go to:" Thanks!

  • @10thdim
    @10thdim12 жыл бұрын

    With sets of data, one set can be orthogonal to another if it includes the first set but adds new data points that were previously unavailable. Physicists have said there are ten spatial or space-like dimensions. It's easy to see how a 1D line represents a set of data points, a 2D plane can include the 1D line but add a whole new data point set, a 3D space can include... and so on. If the ten dimensions are space-like, then that orthogonality continues to occur with each additional dimension.

  • @sil.knight6672
    @sil.knight667211 жыл бұрын

    Beautiful concepts though I love your videos

  • @10thdim
    @10thdim12 жыл бұрын

    Physicists tell us gravity is the only force that exerts itself across the extra dimensions. So even when we get to these dimensions where we're talking more about information and potential selection patterns, it's interesting to imagine how there can be tendencies towards grouping. Also, brane theorists have proposed that there could be evidence of "other" universes bumping into ours within the CMB, if proved that could also be evidence of the kinds of extra-D interaction you're asking about.

  • @raisen90timpa
    @raisen90timpa12 жыл бұрын

    If I hadn't read the "What's With The Ponies" comment before starting to watch the vid I'd have been completely MIND BLOWN when they appeared. Also, bronies are everywhere!

  • @PlantMatters
    @PlantMatters11 жыл бұрын

    yay! my favorite dimension!

  • @MalevolentBrutalisk
    @MalevolentBrutalisk11 жыл бұрын

    If theres a point "a" and a point "b" in a 1 dimensional world (a line) then does that mean there is a point where the dimension ends? And if so what would happen if someone in this 1 dimensional world crossed it?

  • @10thdim
    @10thdim12 жыл бұрын

    As I've said elsewhere, I'm not convinced it's correct to call Zero a dimension. But since I've also said that in many ways the zero and the ten within my approach are connected, and I've also said that the tenth dimension in its enfolded, unobserved state is the omniverse, I guess we 'could' invoke the transitive property of equality and say your statement is correct. For me, as long as we end up with something like Tegmark's Ultimate Ensemble I don't like to get too hung up on this question.

  • @president.z2566
    @president.z25668 жыл бұрын

    If things in the 3rd dimension see everything as 2 dimensional and all things in the 2nd dimension see everything as 1st dimensional. What do the organisms of the first dimension see.

  • @10thdim

    @10thdim

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Kandachi Nusaki An awareness in the first dimension, if we're following the same logic, should only be able to perceive a zero-dimensional point. kzread.info/dash/bejne/l6GgxdmyptHZl5M.html

  • @nexusutube

    @nexusutube

    8 жыл бұрын

    +10thdim While we are physically 3D yet see in 2D, what about animals like bats or whales using sonar or echo location? Couldn't their brains perceive in 3D? Now extrapolate that to other dimensions. Perhaps a 2D could "see" 3D with sonar.

  • @yollgully1

    @yollgully1

    8 жыл бұрын

    +nexusutube Humans see 3D. Predatory, forward facing eyes provide stereo optics.

  • @nexusutube

    @nexusutube

    8 жыл бұрын

    Jack Ballz Humans don't see 3D our brains extrapolate a 3D map in our mind from the two 2D planes our eyes give us. To truly see 3D you would be able to look at an object and see every surface side simultaneously as well as perhaps every plane inside its depth. Hence my comment about sonar sight. I would consider the ultrasound/echo location vision of the super hero Dare Devil to be true 3D sight.

  • @AlnelExtreme

    @AlnelExtreme

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Beelzebub +10dim This is somewhat analogous to the numeral systems.. In base 10 like we normally use, we can use only the digits from 0 to 9.. In base 8, only those from 0 to 7. In base 2, we can use only 0 and 1.

  • @TheMantisShrimp
    @TheMantisShrimp11 жыл бұрын

    Professor, since the dimensions are only a matter of perception, but yet matter still exists, therefore mustn't lines collide with other lines since there's no width

  • @jesse02720
    @jesse0272012 жыл бұрын

    Nice, love it

  • @isaacwellborn
    @isaacwellborn9 жыл бұрын

    That second of Rainbow Dash just earned you another subscriber. :3

  • @Nephallum48

    @Nephallum48

    9 жыл бұрын

    Really? That's why you subscribe?

  • @isaacwellborn

    @isaacwellborn

    9 жыл бұрын

    Nephallum A.K.A Zach No not really XD He actually helped me a lot with my physics homework and his videos blow my mind, but that second of Rainbow Dash blew my mind as well

  • @avantebrittain2930
    @avantebrittain2930 Жыл бұрын

    Mindbending content 🔥👌

  • @maxgunn555
    @maxgunn55511 жыл бұрын

    so i take trace is some being from a higher dimension?

  • @cheater21211
    @cheater2121112 жыл бұрын

    It made your video 20% cooler. :D

  • @zezt
    @zezt12 жыл бұрын

    We are talking about dynamic processes. Dynamic as in alive, and changing and cyclic and intermingling. But what the conceptualizing mind has tended to do in some groups is say eg 'Oh look that is 'dark' and that is 'light', and then once this is done pretend that you have two independent categories instead of a dynamic process, and often also they will say that one category is superior to the other one, and thus you have light deified and the dark feared.

  • @curtiswalton8784
    @curtiswalton87843 жыл бұрын

    At 2:20, a change in the first dimension would be distance not time, correct?

  • @10thdim

    @10thdim

    3 жыл бұрын

    At 2:20 I propose that time for our imaginary 2D Flatlander would be perceived as being one of two opposing directions in the third dimension. So a 5D creature would think time/anti time was in the 6th dimension, and we 3D creatures perceive it as being in the fourth dimension, and so on. These dimensions are not switching from spatial to temporal, they are always spatial. So yes, for a 2D Flatlander they would perceive the first and second dimensions as being measurable distances, like length or width. But as we discuss in my video What Would a Flatlander Really See, things get even weirder when you realize that 2D creatures would only see a world made out of 1D lines, in the same way that 3D humans really only see 2D, and it’s our brains that use parallax motion and the differences between what each eye sees to deduce the 3D-ness of the world around us based upon the 2D images being projected onto our retinas.

  • @GShock112
    @GShock11212 жыл бұрын

    A problem with the lines I never quite got the hang of... how can we tell if the universe is flat with the lines? If the universe was curved they would follow the curvature but still appear as line to us who are inside that universe.

  • @MumbleEtc
    @MumbleEtc11 жыл бұрын

    That is probably the cutest thing ever

  • @ASmith-cc5zc
    @ASmith-cc5zc10 жыл бұрын

    Lesson learned... Dimensions can make one nauseous.

  • @peterm.souzajr.2112
    @peterm.souzajr.21127 жыл бұрын

    ive been to seventh domension, how do i get further

  • @MrGamegurukid
    @MrGamegurukid11 жыл бұрын

    NOW I get it!

  • @10thdim
    @10thdim12 жыл бұрын

    haha, I highly doubt that there could be a form of life confined to one-dimensional line. Even a 2D flatlander requires quite a stretch of the imagination, that's why I usually call our flatlander imaginary. The point of these discussions of the first few dimensions is not to propose that there's creatures living within them, but to help us understand the relationships between dimensions, which then gives us a way to help imagine the extra spatial dimensions beyond space-time.

  • @Elminster-ln4yw
    @Elminster-ln4yw2 жыл бұрын

    This video makes for great asmr

  • @memeist2472
    @memeist24725 жыл бұрын

    Can life eyist in 1d?

  • @mattstephens6137
    @mattstephens61374 жыл бұрын

    So with this basic understanding of the first dimension, I kinda feel that it sorta crosses over into 2-D space. I mean, how significant is a x, and y axis if you can just rotate the first dimension at any point covering all of the same space you would cover in a 2-D world. It would only add the concepts of time and rotation but it still covers both planes. Am I right or no? Because tbh dimensions confuse the hell out of me. I'm just getting back from the 8th.

  • @phoenix-wc5vx
    @phoenix-wc5vx3 жыл бұрын

    There is reality before 1D, it is one point of light beyond time and space ...

  • @10thdim

    @10thdim

    3 жыл бұрын

    In imagining the Zeroth Dimension I look at how, in a way, it covers the Everything.

  • @tobindf
    @tobindf11 жыл бұрын

    if a time LINE is the fourth dimension than you could still add 2 more dimensions of time to form a sort of time cube crating 6 dimensions. height 1, width 2, length 3, time line 4, square 5, cube 6. what about emotions and senses? these must fit in somewhere in the dimensional debate. im still trying to wrap my head around it but i figure that different people, depending on their level of awareness already exist on dimensions beyond the 4th. thoughts?

  • @GreenChristianMama
    @GreenChristianMama8 жыл бұрын

    Is there really a such thing as a line? Or is it all curves? Specifically, if space is curved, then there are more than way to get to one another. So why one path over the other?

  • @GreenChristianMama

    @GreenChristianMama

    8 жыл бұрын

    Loving all these videos, 10thdim. You worked hard on them, and I wanted to say "thank you". It's awesome.

  • @aaronsanjuan5946
    @aaronsanjuan59468 жыл бұрын

    I'm having a hard time understanding dimensions :( please help me ?

  • @EvoArtsLLC

    @EvoArtsLLC

    5 жыл бұрын

    Dimensions are points of references that can intersect one another to create another dimension at 90 degrees. Length without width or height is 1 dimension Width without length or height is 1 dimension Height without length or width is 1 dimension Length and width without height is 2 dimension Length and height without width is 2 dimensions Height and width without length is 2 dimensions Length, Width and Height are 3 dimensions. Length, Width and Height in reference to movement is 4 dimensions. You must intersect each point at 90 degrees with 90 degrees of rotation to create a dimension.

  • @andrewgrandma2816

    @andrewgrandma2816

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@EvoArtsLLC what happens if theyre at 45 or 65 degrees

  • @EvoArtsLLC

    @EvoArtsLLC

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@andrewgrandma2816 a cross section or otherwise you can think of it as 50/50 split view of the plane of 2 axis like x and y or x and z or y and z planes. That view will always have 2 references because it is 1/2 way to either dimension

  • @andrewgrandma2816

    @andrewgrandma2816

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@EvoArtsLLC is dimensions a fancy way of saying varying degrees of observing, understanding. And so in reality there is just one dimension. Reality itself. Besides we are yet to find aliens. So why claim reality is a hologram just yet. Shouldn't we manage to create a worm hole engine first before going nuts in claiming the universe is so ultra wacky and contains weird situations only because nerd scientists find a fluctuation of energy measured here and then. I think were over thinking it.

  • @EvoArtsLLC

    @EvoArtsLLC

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@andrewgrandma2816 no your just too sloopy in your thinking and not understanding because you may have ADHD or your lazy minded.

  • @shorty1970
    @shorty197011 жыл бұрын

    Yay!

  • @BossChiefMan
    @BossChiefMan8 жыл бұрын

    (0:35 and 0:37) Rainbow Dash tho

  • @Hectorjohn73
    @Hectorjohn7311 жыл бұрын

    Nice Work (:

  • @elonmudd
    @elonmudd2 жыл бұрын

    I also like to imagine fourth dimensions and up experiencing time simultaneously as opposed to our view of time moving in one direction

  • @10thdim
    @10thdim11 жыл бұрын

    I find it easier to imagine 4D than 3D: how can an object be made out of 3 dimensions only? That would mean it has no duration within the 4th dimension. We calmly tell each other that what we see around us is the third dimension, and yet when using the same kind of logic you're using to argue against the 2nd dimension being real, we could say the third dimension is just as hypothetical! These ideas are discussed in more detail in Imagining the Third Dimension and Imagining the Fourth Dimension.

  • @zezt
    @zezt12 жыл бұрын

    yes it is conceptual like I said at the beginning.

  • @antonvinny
    @antonvinny11 жыл бұрын

    i got hypnotized in the middle and then i lost.

  • @mika1998125
    @mika199812511 жыл бұрын

    what is with the ponys?

  • @Ycylyon
    @Ycylyon11 жыл бұрын

    isn't going from one dimension "n" to the next dimension "n+1" just like a mathematical integration? looking at dimensions from this base, it's quite weird there is a maximum of ten dimensions, so my generalization fails it seems :P

  • @ShortFingeredShreder
    @ShortFingeredShreder11 жыл бұрын

    0:35 Why?

  • @QueenFondue
    @QueenFondue11 жыл бұрын

    do the negative first dimension next! :P

  • @tishaflorence1009

    @tishaflorence1009

    4 жыл бұрын

    0-D = -1-D

  • @kysennpai
    @kysennpai11 жыл бұрын

    i would like to propose we make the first dimension the time dimension. in zero, it is whole, but once negative one is pulled, time is implied. first dimension, therefore, is time, or expansion. to me, imagining the zero dimension would be an all white canvas, no movement, no seperation. then your animation for zeroith placed as first dimension, where the one dimensional line is the entirety of the code played out and duplicated. one line of code

  • @TheReaMrBurntSausage
    @TheReaMrBurntSausage11 жыл бұрын

    how would you miss that? I was trying to pause on it :)

  • @Rafinius
    @Rafinius11 жыл бұрын

    Why can't there be more than 10, or 11, 523 dimensions? Shouldn't there be infinite dimensions, thus creating something like a line of dimensions? And maybe even negative dimensions? So that if we take, for instance, the 1st and the 3rd dimensions (length and width I think) we could draw some kind of meta-line through all dimensions that goes on infinetly through all those dimensions from dimension infinity[-] to infinity[+] thus creating the first meta-dimension?

  • @TimmyTues
    @TimmyTues9 жыл бұрын

    The first dimension should be time. Without time, there is no existence. There IS nothing. All of the other dimensions you describe imply that there is a moment in which they exist. There are no moments, therefore the FIRST dimension MUST be time...everything else can then follow.

  • @buzzlightyear6796
    @buzzlightyear679610 жыл бұрын

    Now I get it.

  • @MrRatedRplayer
    @MrRatedRplayer11 жыл бұрын

    as a brony and a lover of both math and science, this pleases me.

  • @Tyrael7-bf1ld6zu6s
    @Tyrael7-bf1ld6zu6s10 ай бұрын

    I support this idea

  • @prkycck4445
    @prkycck44453 жыл бұрын

    If you read this and I might have wrote this before I don’t know but I just wanted to thank you. This documentary has opened my eyes to so many things. I do hope to meet you one day and shake your hand. I was in an abusive relationship a little while back and because of your documentary I was able to realise what this evil person was doing to me by looking at what was happening from a different perspective which I would not have done if it wasn’t for this documentary. And I have recommended this documentary to many people suffering from Narcissistic abuse. Have you thought of adding the mind of a human to the dimensions. ? Can the human mind also be divided into dimensions? And what are the similarities between the human mind and the dimensions if any at all?

  • @10thdim

    @10thdim

    3 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for your kind words, they mean a lot to me! It’s interesting to note that back at the beginning of quantum theory there was general agreement that consciousness is fundamental to reality. Schrodinger liked to say “life creates pockets of negative entropy “. Life engages with the randomness of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle and creates order out of chaos. I believe all living things have some degree of consciousness... and that being engaged with the “what happens next” in our probability space is the difference between being alive and not. Regarding the human mind and dimensions - in recent years there have been brain studies that indicate structures of up to eleven dimensions are used in the processing of information. Here’s a 2018 article about that: www.sciencealert.com/science-discovers-human-brain-works-up-to-11-dimensions Thanks for writing!

  • @WadelDee
    @WadelDee11 жыл бұрын

    The two points shown at 0:35 and 0:38 are, as he says, "at the tip of your nose and at the tip of my nose". Actually, they are at the tip of two Rainbow Dashs' noses. How do I know that? You can see her head for a very short time if you pause the video at these times, the times in which the points appear. What's going on there?

  • @leafatheart
    @leafatheart6 жыл бұрын

    This series is awesome i understand up to the fifth dimension now and can visualize it not just as 2 attached tesseracts

  • @benquinney2
    @benquinney26 жыл бұрын

    Keep calm and define

  • @TicTacMentheDouce
    @TicTacMentheDouce10 жыл бұрын

    3:00 seeing through the Time Vortex

  • @AEpTaVEpT
    @AEpTaVEpT11 жыл бұрын

    Dat Rainbow Dash. I honestly was close to a heart attack when she popped up. I didn't expect the sudden burst of color.

  • @progamingmaster2292
    @progamingmaster22922 жыл бұрын

    After 9 years yo 😀👍🏻

  • @MilkyWhiskers00
    @MilkyWhiskers0011 жыл бұрын

    Well well. More people will enjoy it now.

  • @riejrjejejrjejrjrkenendkdj4207
    @riejrjejejrjejrjrkenendkdj42076 жыл бұрын

    I remember watching all these dimension videos in 3rd grade.

  • @castleai9551
    @castleai95514 жыл бұрын

    but if the line didn't have width or depth, then would we be able to see it ?

  • @10thdim

    @10thdim

    4 жыл бұрын

    No. We can imagine a !D line but we can’t see a line with no width or depth. Likewise, we can imagine a 2D plane but we can’t see a plane with no depth. In fact, since the third dimension is space without time, we can really only imagine the third dimension as well. It’s not until we string 3D states together to create a 4D worldline that we can actually see what it is we’re imagining!

  • @kydwykyd
    @kydwykyd9 жыл бұрын

    I need friends who know physics so they can talk to me about this stuff lol

  • @todd1896
    @todd189610 жыл бұрын

    My Little Pony heads at 0:35. What is this?

  • @bin4rym4ge

    @bin4rym4ge

    10 жыл бұрын

    lol

  • @CadetGriffin

    @CadetGriffin

    10 жыл бұрын

    It's Rainbow Dash.

  • @reuelt.290

    @reuelt.290

    10 жыл бұрын

    yep good ol' rainbow dash

  • @PickyMcCritical

    @PickyMcCritical

    9 жыл бұрын

    I was equally stunned and confused.

  • @Shoegazebasedgenre0.
    @Shoegazebasedgenre0.9 жыл бұрын

    >wow kewl science vids >wait wut is dat at 0:36 >pause > [X]

  • @zakiahmed6655

    @zakiahmed6655

    6 жыл бұрын

    chaos lord it's 0:35

  • @10thdim
    @10thdim12 жыл бұрын

    Don't confuse a line you see with the line we're talking about here. Yes, if I draw a line on paper it has length, a bit of width, and even a bit of depth, but saying that proves the idea of a line with no width or depth is impossible doesn't make sense. I use this example in Imagining the 2nd Dimension: if I say "imagine you're on a boat in the middle of the ocean" and you say "I'm not on a boat and I don't like the water" that doesn't disprove boats and water as concepts. watch?v=4s1-UR3D21s

  • @ciachofil
    @ciachofil2 жыл бұрын

    Lower dimensions are not really easier to imagine how sentient being could exist in such manner. 1 dimension is just line without width which means it can't be seen how it really looks like as we always see it in 2 dimension perspective. It always has some width for as to see it even in minds.

  • @10thdim

    @10thdim

    2 жыл бұрын

    One of the examples I’ve used is what it’s like to talk about dragons… even though they don’t exist, just saying the word “dragon” brings an image to mind. Likewise, even though a one-dimensional line would really have to have at least some width for we 3D creatures to “see” it, I don’t agree that that means it’s impossible for us to imagine a line with length only, no width or depth. One can choose to imagine such a concept, or one can refuse to do so, true enough, same would go for dragons. In What Would a Flatlander Really See, I explore the idea that for humans each eye is really only seeing a 2D image projected on to their retina. Likewise, our imaginary 2D Flatlanders would only “see” a reality of 1D lines, and a 1D observer would only “see” a point. Is anybody suggesting that there are really sentient beings in the first and second dimension? I don’t think so, they’re really only useful as a thought experiment, as we try to imagine each new spatial dimension. By definition, “spatial” (or at least ‘space-like as some theorists prefer to say) means each additional dimension is orthogonal in a new way to the dimensions that have come before. This is based upon the logic of the point-line-plane postulate, which is the accepted methodology for visualizing any number of spatial dimensions.

  • @Lastrevio
    @Lastrevio9 жыл бұрын

    Do a video for imagining the -1th dimension.

  • @user-dl9cw8mi3f

    @user-dl9cw8mi3f

    8 жыл бұрын

    That is just. NOTHING. There is NOTHING to imagine.

  • @tuffue2724

    @tuffue2724

    5 жыл бұрын

    Кулер Малиночив lol Jesus

  • @tishaflorence1009

    @tishaflorence1009

    4 жыл бұрын

    The 0th dimension would be like erasing the line in the first dimension anything negative in reality can't exist but anyway since you can't get rid of something that isn't there it would the same as the 0th dimension TLDR: 0-D = -1-D

  • @CatoSierraWasTaken
    @CatoSierraWasTaken11 жыл бұрын

    3:14 Thinking? how am i supposed to think of anything while being hypnotized?

  • @Yistern
    @Yistern11 жыл бұрын

    @mika1998125 As difficult as this is to understand, Bronies have the tendency to be capable of participating in any concept, and are therefore inexplicably the same as every other human, within reason, but with a slightly stricter grouping. But that's a simple observation, and should merely be left at that.

  • @RF-fi2pt
    @RF-fi2pt5 жыл бұрын

    We have notion of Space because exist Objects. We have notion of Time because exists Movement. Extrapolating before bigbang we do not have space as we are inside one point and no time as neither particle change state.

  • @10thdim
    @10thdim12 жыл бұрын

    Sure, a one dimensional line is a concept, just like a boat or an ocean or love or gravity are concepts. Our 3D eyes can't see one-dimensional things, agreed. But there's a difference between saying something is impossible for us to see and saying something doesn't exist.

  • @metallicarabbit
    @metallicarabbit11 жыл бұрын

    ponies, taking over youtube one vid at a time