Such a great aspect to 1946 that there are so many cool aircraft available. I wish the developers would re-release a update to bring 46 up to BOS BOK level of graphics flight models etc.

@emmerad

6 жыл бұрын

Yes

@PORRRIDGE_GUN

Жыл бұрын

I don't think much more can be done with the graphics. It certainly is greatly improved. But the best thing about '46 is the gameplay

A Maus on the runway at takeoff, nice touch!

Wow it's amazing how switching to turboprops change the whole nature of the Stormbird

The Turboprop engines give you an eargasm

The Messerschmitt Me - 262 : A perfect fly swatter for swatting flies (read : "Heavy babies" and their "nannies") From the crowded German skies! (This is how they streak earthwards : ☄☄☄☄☄☄☄☄☄☄). WÜNDERBAR! 🔥🔥🔥⚡⚡⚡💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻

That turbo job looks quite more romantic than the old mean brute Me262...=)

Something along similar lines, and yet, none of those who are fans of Luft 46 and whif forums is a single engine fighter, such as the FW190D or the TA152 with the same DB021 this 262 has a pair of. . I've been building a 190D with the 021 in 1/32 scale. Not sure about the history I'll have to generate(have to keep this theoretically plausible, so no fancy scifi mods and the like). Not even sure if it'd have an interceptor mission, point defense(which actually wouldn't make a whole lot of sense, as such a fighter would have to have the ability to go really fast from a near standing start, like fighters like some of the early MiG jets, including the MiG 21), a strike fighter, such as the Westland Wyvern, or even an attack role as witnessed by the Piper Enforcer, which was a modified P51 with turboprop. Still, it does offer some tantalizing possibilities.

Damn, the props are definitely a visual improvement on the 262.

Certainly this 262 will have less problems with acceleration while landing, when the p51s and 47s came to visit em

@mwmaxwgreen

6 жыл бұрын

Yes, as well as better fuel economy, which is also an important factor, given that the twin turbojets were, like all 1st or 2nd generation jet engines, were quite thirsty.And, I'm wondering something else.If the JUMO 004 and the BMW 003 were limited in operational life, average TBO being something like ten hours. If your not familiar the term, it means Time Between Overhauls.Right now, in the aviation industry, there is a move away from alloy turbine blades to ceramic, which are manufactured by old methods(casting and cooking). Might there have been a chance that one of the engineers at Junkers or other jet engine manufacturers, stumbled upon ceramics as a possible turbine blade material, and had soon after begun producing blades for all extant turbine engine designs? A 262 that could fly for as long as the fuel it carried lasted? A medium range He162? This is something to consider.

@user-do5zk6jh1k

6 жыл бұрын

Also less problems deceleraring, since a windmilling prop acts like an airbrake

@PORRRIDGE_GUN

Жыл бұрын

@@user-do5zk6jh1k Especially if you can put it into reverse pitch.

Thats the coolest bird to ever butter an airstrip. How do you say "Mosquito Swatter" in German?

@spitefulwar

3 жыл бұрын

Fliegenklatsche.

Wow! This Turboprop version looks much better than the standard Me-262's! :-)

You could have used a PT6, Allison 250, Kuznetsovs or any other turboprop for sound effect. Those engines sound like JT8Ds in dire need of some walnut shell.

Dam well thought out Sir, but if you look at it from a different angle like I did and have, a 262 with the following: Drop tanks, After Burners, Speed brakes, Movable tail planes. try that......

@A.G.798

11 ай бұрын

Mit Panzer abwerfen sind abwerfbare Zusatztanks gemeint, hält ein blödes Übersetzungsprogramm.

What are u engaging? P-51s? (Sound of prop engines) Can't say by watching the video.

@Steven197106

6 жыл бұрын

P-63 , LA-7

The chasing crafts were rocket assisted (like La-7R) or just damaged by fuel tank puncturing?

@Steven197106

6 жыл бұрын

damaged p-63

Hey Steven 197106 how do i install this plane? Is it the same proses you told me earlier

@Steven197106

6 жыл бұрын

drop the folder in waw and then go to STD folder com, open each folder till you come to the air file then open and all your aircraft are listed here, now add the lines in the 262TFP folder like under the 262 section in the german pit add , Me-262A-V1 air.ME_262AV1 2 g01 SUMMER

@VacMaster1991

6 жыл бұрын

I just looked i already have this plane XD

@VacMaster1991

6 жыл бұрын

Also if you have any recommendations for texture or sound upgrades for Luftwaffe planes just tell me.

😳 Wow!

Good

05:26 who is that,is it a photo? lol

Too much straight line flight, in-out, in-out. Can the Me262 B2 dogfight or do torque turns? Didn't see much of that here. Energy state fighting is so inefficient against other fighters.

Hat es dieses Flugzeug tatsächlich gegeben, oder nur die Konstruktionspläne davon ?

@kg_sroberth2238

6 жыл бұрын

nur Blaupausen... :)

@sucherso-sein6769

6 жыл бұрын

Vielen Dank, Floyd :oD

@kg_sroberth2238

6 жыл бұрын

Kein Problem :)

@Steven197106

6 жыл бұрын

Papier entworfen, nie produziert

@sucherso-sein6769

6 жыл бұрын

Auch Dir Steven vielen Dank. Ist schon ein sehr geiles Flugzeug (im Spiel).

Looks like about 6K alt.

b2 or b1?!

Cruising at 420 with a pair of nose drops?

Графика класс.что за мод?

Na ja, was soll das bringen, da würde ich doch ein reines Strahltriebwerk vorziehen! Mehr Zeug dran,kann auch mehr Kaputt gehen. Technisch gesehen wäre ein Nachbrenner gut.

did germans even had Turboprops?

@Pixy335

6 жыл бұрын

In projects certainly, and maybe some early prototypes were constructed, but i'm only few % sure, don't rely on me here.

@Steven197106

6 жыл бұрын

paper designed, never produced

@adamweaver4195

6 жыл бұрын

lots of paper designs were drawn up. a good resource would be luft'46.com

@KylleinMacKellerann

6 жыл бұрын

They had designs but lacked the materials to make a reliable jet engine, and since turbo-props use a second set of turbines past the power turbines to generate take-off power (for the props, not the flight) they never achieved reality. All things considered, using those early jets to power props made more sense than using them as pure reaction engines.

@JohnDoe-ee6qs

6 жыл бұрын

NiumeLT they invented them and there were many types built before the and of the war and countless others on the drawing board, but as far as I know these were never put into airframes as the war ended before this could happen.

螺旋槳？？？

@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu

5 жыл бұрын

Totally.

Il 2 1946 CUP?

@Steven197106

6 жыл бұрын

vp modpack

@Mossi-fd4es

6 жыл бұрын

Steven 197106 where find?

@jesseboombatts

6 жыл бұрын

www.sas1946.com/main/index.php?topic=50919.0

One problem is, turboprops guzzle fuel

@__dINe__

4 жыл бұрын

true, but much much less than the jumo 004, that was the big change.

@vumba1331

3 жыл бұрын

The Jugs were not known for being frugal, they really guzzled top grade avgas whereas these would theoretically run on diesel or kerosene, much cheaper and more readily available. The Jugs also consumed huge amounts of oil so their flight times were at times limited.

THEY ARE GIVEN TO MUCH TIME TO DAMADE A TARGET ZONE

Weint auf deutsch

B gxl Lo