How did the Subaru score acceptable? The rear pasagener smacked their head on the window sill, and their head went under the curtain, because there is no protection there, just a piece of cloth.

@calebj2886

10 ай бұрын

Actual measured forces probably show it wasn’t a serious impact. That and the head going under the airbag isn’t doing much.

@HR-wd6cw

2 ай бұрын

@@calebj2886 Yes that and if you look at where the glass went, it went up and out, so it sort of "blew" out if you will. You're more likely to be injured by something else other than the rear window breaking like that (such as the headliner coming down when the airbag deploys or like in the case of the Honda, you bang your head on the top of the roof liner, which could be more serious than perhaps a few scratches or cuts from glass, which I don't think even happened here. But basically they assume that all glass will break anyway so it isn't really a factor to be tested (and in some cases, you want the glass to break). The only "window" that is of siginficance in a crash is the windshield.

Makes me feel so much better about buying a 23’ Accord Hybrid!

@Cakewalk.

10 ай бұрын

I already knew, saw years back 2017 i’d say when my College buddies drove to my place, they got into an accident, the Rav 4 had the most damage and declared total compared to the accord same model of of one of my friends car as well that got involved in the same accident in a 4 pin car crash by a truck behind the accord and the rav 4 in front of the accord.

It’s crazy how far cars have come in the past 25 years with safety features

@FriendofMineralTown

9 ай бұрын

Yeah it seems like everything used to be completely horrible and now it’s just “poor”.

Subaru should get POOR look where rear passenger's head went

@2019Q7Quattro

10 ай бұрын

The vehicle protected the dummy well, and the reason it got marked down is indeed because of where the dummy’s head went

Camry should have been poor since all that back glass shattered on the inside

Honda winning on this one!

Got to be honest, I would consider any of these, compared to where cars rated from the nineties and early 2000’s these all all seem great

Thank you very much!

I love my 2023 Honda accord ❤

The Outback did pretty good considering it's on an aging platform

Subaru rear passenger head went between side airbag and window it should get a POOR rating

So informative

Best cresh test

Frightening that the camerys back window shattered.

Jus amazing ❤

Subaru should have been a FAIL the side airbag for rear occupant allowed the head to slip between airbag and door resulting in a serious injury

@calebj2886

10 ай бұрын

well according to actual measured data, there was no serious injury risk.

Not sure why the Jetta is here when it’s a compact car, the rest of the cars in this test are actually midsize and more similar in length/width to one another

@2019Q7Quattro

10 ай бұрын

Well I think the Jetta got heavier during the 2019 remodel, putting it in the Midsize sedan category

@BDoOC99

10 ай бұрын

@@2019Q7Quattro the Jetta is still at least 200lbs lighter than all of the rest of the actual midsize sedans though

@2019Q7Quattro

10 ай бұрын

But that isn’t too much lighter than the rest

Damn. How the hell that the rear windshield on the Camry shatter from a front crash. That is deadly.

Cool music. 🎼

@maxdabss

8 ай бұрын

it’s Nihilism on I-10 by Amulets

3:43 The sonata did well

Waoo it's a great idea to check a whickels....

I’d take the Accord

Bruh the have the Subaru acceptable when the kids head ended up on the wrong side of the air bag

Now I will wait for the tests of Volvo, BMW, Mercedes.

The accord is the best car. Even though the rear passenger hit his head on the roof, its really a little injury compared to the Camry where the rear glass shattered. Even though the accord is little expensive then the camry, its much safer.

The wisdom from this is that the side airbags hurt the rear passenger more than help.

@5610winston

6 ай бұрын

The Outback, the Accord, and the Altima are the only ones where the rear passenger didn't do _The Exorcist_ effect where the head spins completely around backwardand with the Outback it was because the rear passenger submarined under the side airbacg and came up between the airbag and the window.

Dang that beginning of video was epic 0:01 0:01 0:02 0:02 0:03 0:03 0:04 0:04 0:05 0:05 0:06 0:06 0:07 0:07 0:08

The intro talked about our lives.

It seems to me that Jetta swallowed the blow better, but there is a safety margin. Toyota - passengers are cut by the rear window, Honda - a very hard body blow, passengers flew up, Kia/Hyundai - it's just a misunderstanding!!! Subaru - the rear passenger's head is 100% torn off in an accident.

How much is the structural integrity affected by cutting a one-square-foot hole in the roof?

@op3l

11 ай бұрын

It would be negligible. The outer metal is mostly for looks, there’s cross structures under the sheet metal that provides the actual support.

This would be my dream job 😊😊😊. I like to know how long time wise does it take to prepare one vehicle for a crash test ? Why don't we see more cars such as Bently ,Rolls Royce ,Ferraries ,Lamborghini, Porsche etc .

@Xian..

11 ай бұрын

They need to crash it around 100 times to get accurate results so expensive cars aren’t really practical to crash test.

@PhillipineLover612

10 ай бұрын

Those Cars are Expensive and there not really a car you see possibly every day

@RidgeMu

9 ай бұрын

But it's boring.

@Xian..

9 ай бұрын

@@RidgeMu Different opinions. And won’t it be fun to go to work to crash cars.

@Sashazur

8 ай бұрын

I’m just guessing but they don’t have unlimited money, so if they test cheaper cars they can test more of them more thoroughly, and those cars are much more common which means the tests will potentially save many more people from injury or death.

why is the music SO SCARY

It's crazy that people want more SUVs but mid size cars are still safer.

it would be nice if the reasons for the ratings would be given.... in my eyes, while the head was caught on the headliner, the jetta it didn't had the head go out the window... literally. like the outback had....

I have an all original 1968 Chevy Impala (pillarless 4-door) that is family owned since day 1. I'm the 3rd gen to have it. I watch stuff like this, where these cars are rated "poor" and think to myself....."well, shit, if I get into a crash like this with my Impala, I might as well drive with my belt off, I'm going to die anyways!" For the record (if you know my car) I do at least wear the lap belt.

The Jetta seems safer than the Camry, no glass shattered like the Camry, possibly harming someone very seriously

Im in the crash test land

5:35 The Altima Was good

El ñiño de atras el subaru😢😢

Saw this Test, but with a Jetta involved and it out performed all of the other bigger cars

Doesn’t cutting a hole in the roof compromise the structure?

@rugbynimbus

9 ай бұрын

Sheetmetal only, not the frame (in theory, anyway).

0:18 was that the gartic phone noise?

Hi can you make a video about crashing a a truck covered with Line-x Pls 🙏

There's gotta be a material that's more resistant to crashes🎯

@SystemRadioStatic

10 ай бұрын

There is, some older cars are made of very nice crash resistant materials, though most companies would rather use the cheaper option because that means they can pump out cars quicker ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ it would also crash the repair industry they have if the cars were more resistant to damage so they prolly wont be using better material any time soon

@PhillyDee215

10 ай бұрын

@@SystemRadioStatic .....yup😏

@stained6202

9 ай бұрын

@@SystemRadioStatic What? Newer cars are far safer than older ones. Crumple Zones exist so the car absorbs some of the energy from the crash.

@Sashazur

8 ай бұрын

The car’s structure needs to deform the right amount to absorb some of the crash energy, so less of it is transmitted to the passengers. If you made a car out of materials that don’t bend or break, then more of the energy would be transferred to the people, resulting in more risk of injury. I would rather injure my car than myself!

@PhillyDee215

8 ай бұрын

@@Sashazur makes sense....

So the cars that did poorly probably did poorly because they weren’t designed with this test in mind. Similar to that small overlap test introduced a few years ago,p in which almost all cars failed or did poorly. So don’t read too much into this unless it’s a car that was released after this updated test was introduced.

@ouch1011

11 ай бұрын

The tests are designed to simulate real world crash scenarios. So, what you’re saying is that the cars that did poorly in this test did so because they were not designed with real world crash scenarios in mind.

@op3l

11 ай бұрын

@@ouch1011Yes that's what I'm saying. They don't get good ratings from this test also means in a real crash they will not perform as well as the "Good" cars. But give them the next model generation where they know this is something they have to design for and the cars that are doing "Poor" or "Marginal" will do better and thus become safer in the real world. That's what I mean by that.

How fast are they going ??

Sucks how my car (KIA K5) Received a poor rating, I wonder if the trim I have (GT-Line AWD) would perform better than the LXS (base model) and trims under the GT-Lines, as well as my Fiancé’s car (Hyundai Sonata) earned a poor as well, but I think the trim she has (N-Line) would perform better than the SE (base model)

@Dizney82

10 ай бұрын

Serious question, why would the trim of the vehicle make any difference in the crash test? Aren’t the trims just luxury features?

@2019Q7Quattro

10 ай бұрын

Well I remember back with the Mitsubishi Galant in 2003 and you could only get side airbags on the highest trim level, the GT-LINE K5 is higher quality than the regular, although structural integrity might be the same as the LXS

@josephj.6478

9 ай бұрын

How u liking ur K5 btw? I love the look of that car so I'm curious what owning one is like

@Sashazur

8 ай бұрын

The structure of the vehicle is the same no matter what trim. Unless a higher trim has more airbags or similar (which is unlikely these days), the crash results are going to be the same. But some higher trims may have collision avoidance or driver assistance features that help avoid or reduce the severity of a crash in the first place.

@yourlocal_torres8289

8 ай бұрын

⁠​⁠@@2019Q7QuattroNow-days, even the base model would have all the airbags, the trims are just for luxury features/more advanced safety features like lane-departure warnings, since it is the same safety-wise it would earn a good in the front seat, where you or your husband would be driving, but if you have any kids it might be a different from them, look at how either the dummy’s neck swings back and forth, or if its submarining. Sorry if it’s a long paragraph, just here to help.

Background music very annoying. I watched with the volume turned down.

❤❤❤🎉

Yea a Airbags

Just saw the honda. What a joke the rear passenger hits the roof edge and it's the only one to get a good rating. Now I'm convinced it's a pay for rating system.

@halogen_lamp

3 ай бұрын

There are also criteria for evaluating the failure value if a mannequin hits its head on the interior. It would be GOOD to include that.

@HR-wd6cw

2 ай бұрын

It could be, but I think part of it is these tests are all weighted. So for example, while hitting one's head on the roof/liner of the car in an accident sounds bad, what may be worse is someone having the lap belt slide up into their stomach (like they mentioned) and causing internal organ damage. The latter is probably more serious then perhaps a cut on the head or a concussion. The ratings are also a composite of many factors too, so particular rating (say front impact) may have "G" for everything else and maybe "Acceptable" for one smaller element, like the head thing, and still get a good "Rating" although I think in the updated rating system (which they changed around 2018-2020 I think) they use the lowest rating in the bunch for the overall rating, but there may still be "weight" applied to different aspects of each rating for each component.

Its crazy how the Jetta is now considered midsized what the hell

@HR-wd6cw

2 ай бұрын

Actually, what's surprising is how many cars have made it into this class. What used to be full-size cars 30 years ago, are now mid-sized. The other thing is that the vast majority of cars have gotten larger as the years have gone one. Look at the Toyota Corolla, Honda Civic, etc. They are about the same size as a late 90's TAurus (which is considered a mid-sized car), even though rental agencies for example, still classify Corollas and Civics as compact or small cars (but that's just how they classify different sized cars).

FRONT RATING POOR - KIA, HYUNDAI, VW MARGINAL - TOYOTA, NISSAN ACCEPTABLE - SUBARU GOOD - HONDA

@emikomina

11 ай бұрын

toyota, nissan, and vw especially need to do better. meanwhile hyundai/kia are dangerous as they've always been.

@that_one_villa

11 ай бұрын

​@@emikomina I still prefer to drive them since my life aint worth that much anyways lmao

😂😂😂lol..... when I go to lada 2107 and watch such crash tests😂😂😂😂😂

something is seriously wrong with non-American car manufacturers selling cars in the U.S. once the pride of the automobile industry is faltering when it comes to safety & faltering bad . . .

Its 2023, These cars Should BE BETTER!!😱

Obviously, these vehicles are not running during the test. The transmission is in neutral, and there probably isn't any gas in the gas tank.

@rp42069

11 ай бұрын

I've never seen testing with the vehicles running. It's always been done this way. They would no longer have control over the test environment.

@Nicolas-cg2xx

11 ай бұрын

​@@rp42069check out old crash tests, there's a video of an actual real person driving the car and crashing it into another

@Sashazur

8 ай бұрын

If they had gas in the tank there would be a high risk of fire or fuel leaks. Sure those are things that it would be good to test for, but it would make testing much more expensive and dangerous. Most cars don’t explode in a crash so it’s probably not worth doing considering the increased problems in testing.

2:14 Seriously Toyota

@dylanofficial456

Ай бұрын

2:28 I already hate Toyota but just look at the glass

IIHS is clearly biased. The Subaru rear passenger was nearly ejected and gets an acceptable? Camry rear glass shatters moderate? Accord rear passenger bounces off the roof and gets a good? Must be those bright LED lights.

How does this work? Do you buy a bunch of brand new cars just to smash them ? What do you do with the damaged cars afterwards?

@Nicolas-cg2xx

11 ай бұрын

You can't be serious 🤦

@markpolice3585

11 ай бұрын

@@Nicolas-cg2xx You can explain how it works or I can. Lol

@Sashazur

8 ай бұрын

Yes they buy new cars just to smash them. They just buy from dealers like anyone else, they don’t get the cars from the manufacturers since that might make it possible to cheat. I don’t know what they do with the wrecks afterwards but they almost certainly junk them; the damage is too great to try to fix them.

@Wtrxprs007able

8 ай бұрын

@Sashazur and its government funded, to help manufacturers identify and rectify the issues.

😅😅

The Outback is an SUV tho💀

Hondas have always been safer.

In the Honda, didn't the passenger hit it's head above while going back? The seatbelt didn't keep her safe. How does that get a good rating?

@calebj2886

10 ай бұрын

The seatbelt stayed on the hips, the dummy didn’t slide in the seat out of position, and i’m betting the seatbelt slack allowed for a little less sudden force change.

Honda on top as usual. Just another reason to not buy a Kia or Hyundai

All are fake likes and subscribers. They told me to like it and they will pay me but they didn't.. they disappointed me I'm unlikeing all videos now

no it s not is subaru😂

poor hyundai - kia...sonata, k5 worst

Honda ftw! Theres a reason the Korean brands are cheaper!