Plus, the word "Kiki" letters are looking with more straight lines, as compared to the word "Bouba" which has more round lines. Therefore the vision of the letters enhances their prescribed characteristics.

@jaded8578

5 жыл бұрын

i never really thought of that

@cuteasduck6192

4 жыл бұрын

The video said that it was common across cultures. So instead of the English alphabet having much to do with it, I think it is about the sound the words make and the shapes they represent. The shape representing Kiki looks like broken glass which makes a high pitched sound. Whereas the shape of bouba looks like a blob of slime and makes similar sound.

@judethaddeus9856

3 жыл бұрын

Huh

@c.vraman7885

2 жыл бұрын

@@cuteasduck6192 that is a good observation

@beatrizamaral9354

2 жыл бұрын

As "Cute As Duck" said, I don't think it's because of the alphabet, since a lot of cultures has alphabets different than the roman alphabet that we use, so probably it's because of the sound

I think of tastes in interesting ways, a wide taste and horizontal taste would be the same thing. A long taste and a vertical taste would be the same thing. I don’t like walnuts because they taste too wide, I have no idea how else to describe it, and when people ask me why I don’t like them, I never know what to say.

@caesium_

2 жыл бұрын

Omg yessss warm water tastes slow and cold water tastes fast that's why I don't like warm water, unless it's tea, which changes the feel. Something I can't describe yet lol

@em.mp3130

2 жыл бұрын

@@caesium_ tea is different because it tastes harsher and more of a subdued colour with REALLY BRIGHT UNDERTONES

4 is blue, a nervous guy, the younger sibling of 5, a rebelious and adventurous girl, mostly yellow, who likes to hang out with her cousin, 6. He is mostly chill all the time. B and V are sisters, V is the younger, just like M and N. B and M are friends, and so are V and N.

@anneautisms5136

3 жыл бұрын

2 and 5 are divorced parents of 3 and 4 4 is a nerd 3 and 8 are friends who bully others 8 and 3 are girls 4 is a boy 9 is the grampa of 8

@kennedy.m

3 жыл бұрын

8 is the stereotype red-head who has freckles, braces, a big mouth literally and figuratively, who talks too much and is annoying and a bit self-obsessed. 1 by itself is flashy and full of itself, also wears purple eye shadow, and 2 by itself is kind and shy but always in the shadow of one. Put them together, or multiple 1s and the only way I can describe them is snowy. But put multiple 2s together and its someone who isn't bad but you're a little tired of. 7 by itself is cool and chill, a short person. But it you put it with something (like in 27 or 37) it makes you squirm and want to leave. 9 is fine but used to be in your friend group and then sort of joined a different one. You still hang out sometimes but you've grown apart. 3 is sort of like seven but a little odder. He is a tall dude with dark brown hair and prominent but sort of off features. You want to hate 4 because they're annoying but they keep actually being important. 5 is sort of like 3 but more like popping bobba (I know that makes no sense but idk how to describe it). 6 is your sort of friend's sporty and nice little sister, who is also a little quirky and is bright colors like yellows and pinks. I also have outfits of mine I associate with every number up to 12, but it would be too hard to describe. Past 12, there is a whole other complicated personality and feeling that I associate with each digit combination as well. Also as I write this I realize that I make no sense whatsoever Wow that turned into a whole big paragraph oop-

Ideas are just headaches with pictures.

@19lionkingfan

9 жыл бұрын

Haha, I like that

@punjab135

7 жыл бұрын

nice

@untitleddane

4 жыл бұрын

How painful is it for you to think lmao?

@sunnydasheep

4 жыл бұрын

lol

@yoalisrodriguez8941

Жыл бұрын

Noice

I agree with the vast majority of this, but in my own personal experience with colour>grapheme ideasthesia (perceiving letters, numbers and words as a certain colour) I've found that it isn't completely innate in everyone. Most people I've spoken to about it say they don't have the same innate connection towards graphemes and colours (eg. I've always perceived letters and numbers as specific colours and didn't realise everyone didn't do the same until adulthood. Although they also have a sort of "feeling") I think the difference is 'Interpretation' and 'Perception'. For me letters/numbers and colours have always been the same, rather than interpreting it.

When I'm happy I feel warm When I'm sad I feel cold When I'm excited I feel 'buzzy' When I'm infatuated I feel jumpy and excited

@duckiebee2831

9 жыл бұрын

But ideas are different, there's a feeling I can't explain, if I could, it's verbal representation would be kinda like 'eureka!'

@moe.a.4091

9 жыл бұрын

You need to find a psychotherapist.

@jimmyrocky3045

9 жыл бұрын

sweet.give *instaphamous* a try

@ShubhamThakkarShubhavatar

9 жыл бұрын

Moe. A. Actually he doesn't...stop discouraging a person from expression of his thoughts!

@moe.a.4091

9 жыл бұрын

I am not discouraging him from anything. You are probably new to the term "trolling". Hmm, it seems like you got some issues too. jk

Ask yourself, Is the reality of someone with synesthesia as real as someone without? Is the color red you picture in your minds eye, the same color as the one I picture my own?

@hakoddity

9 жыл бұрын

I have always wondered that myself, but no matter the true color, smell, taste, etc., most people get similar, if not the same impressions from them, usually emotionally derived and based on past experience of the individual (cultural and subjective experience). Which is also interesting, how despite the past upbringing and molding of a person, and even separate societies, we mostly come to the same conclusions as a species, of course with outlying deviations... perhaps the magic lies in those deviations? The fringe elements of society being a place to push boundaries, to grow and to learn something new? Have these been said before? lol

@TaunellE

5 жыл бұрын

No. Absolutely Not. All I know is what red feels, sounds and smells like.. and it's not red.

@havenotchosenyet

3 жыл бұрын

there's also theories that our qualitative experiences might be far more divergent than just i see green you see red, we could merely have a fixed number of dimensional variances to our qualia and the correlations are just learnt by chance, so for what call "redness" i might call "a high pitch", some synesthetes see morphing physical objects when they hear sounds, they only know this because they preserved _both_ sensory correlations rather than just one. so what we "share" might just be how we nest and relate our categories and not the actual qualia..

Can anyone help me with this? I’ve had this question my entire life. Whenever i remember some particular event that has happened to me i get this particular feeling. Like I have special emotion for that event only then there is another emotion for another event but I can’t name that emotion. For example, i had a really nice experience in last year’s christmas, so whenever i remember that day i always always get like a happy feeling and it’s the same feeling every time i remember it. The memory of a particular moment brings me a particular feeling but each feeling is different for every memory. I don’t think it’s synesthesia because I don’t associate it with colors or any of that but rather with sort of emotions and i can’t control it. Anyone else? Is this normal?

@sofiak670

4 жыл бұрын

That's normal! My theory is that nostalgia feels unique for different memories based on the emotions we felt at the time. Like maybe one memory is 40% happy, 10% sad, and 30% excited. So the nostalgia we feel for that memory kind of reflects that combination of emotions?

@delilahsimmons1842

4 жыл бұрын

@@sofiak670 that's a very interesting take!

@ceciliareinert

4 жыл бұрын

Reminded me of pixar's inside out (:

@ANKRITIPANDEYCSE--

3 жыл бұрын

and do you also recall the previous year when you smell the same smell

@maisyellis5705

2 жыл бұрын

This is exactly how I feel. Certain time periods of my life feel a certain way like last summer feels clean to me - that is the only way I can explain it. But it doesn’t evoke an emotion and is triggered by music smells and sights.

I've always thought this! Everything we perceive and experience is just a construction of the mind! Without the mind there is no substance or meaning to the world, just a timeless void.

@gdg6691

9 жыл бұрын

We seem to have this protective mechanism that makes us see ourselves as different (superior?) to the rest of the world. Our minds are completely embedded in the rest of the world. They evolved in what is really a very specific set of conditions, with fixed physics and chemistry. We actually don't have a way of "getting outside" that world to look at it. Even our imaginations are constrained by time and space. Shopenhauer established this.

@14232319

8 ай бұрын

@@gdg6691 "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein

I want to talk with an expert about this... it's so interesting

This just goes forth to reinforce the phrase- "Everything is interconnected", or the more elegant sounding version in Latin: "Omnia Nexum".

It's interesting how the Confirmation Bias also plays a role. Good video, thanks for sharing.

Hi,, It sounds completely logical and even a little obvious when you explain it. Thank you. You have given me a lot to ponder. I'd really like to know more about this.

This video went really deep and I found it a bit hard to follow, but I got it eventually. All credit to Ted-Ed though, they're animations made it possible for me to get it. The concepts discussed in this video are really interesting. Thanks for sharing :)

Such an interesting topic ..I get bliss on watching this topic ...so nice👍

We, the part of our mind that experiences stuff creating the illusion that we are a conscious being located somewhere behind our eyes are not actually thinking, but rather experiencing our thoughts along with all the other sensations which we are aware of, constantly judging and rating them, so that the neural networks whose job it is to abstract sensory information or create impulses/ideas to do or think something can get better at what they are doing.What distinguishes our thoughts from the other sensations, is that they respond immediately to how we rate them. Constantly adjusting. Our consciousness is the equivalent of what you would call a fitness function in machine learning. Without one, a neural network can't learn anything. Any animal with a brain probably has something similar, the main difference being, that they don't have as many layers of abstraction than we do, which are necessary for what we experience as abstract thinking.

proof that artisitc intelligense and creativity are a heightening of a real mental skill

I'm a bouba.

@idanordby5518

5 жыл бұрын

grimmitachi same

@captainobvious.29yearsago70

3 жыл бұрын

I used to be a bouba, but I'm more of a kiki these days

@smile-og3rn

3 жыл бұрын

amazing comment

Outclass video.... Great work

could this also be why certain colors invoke certain feelings?

@elh7149

7 жыл бұрын

Yes

This is exactly what i figured Einstein was on to with the relativity theory. Since everything is relative not only our ideas are relative to us but also relative to themselves. Where our meaning(or idea) of 'Large' is relative to a completely other statement 'Elephant' and vice versa.

i have a question, i have been all over the internet asking what the heck do i expirience and the answer is always synesthesia, but i dont connect colors with days and numbers etc, but what i expirience is especific images in my brain that connect with numbers days hours years months etc. do any of you guys expirience the same?

@elh7149

7 жыл бұрын

There's no yes or no or black and white for this. It's all on a spectrum. I think you have ideasthesia, but I also think everyone has ideasthesia. It's something everyone does, from the connection of red and stop to kiki and the spiky shape. What's different about these and what you experience is these will be more common for everyone, but yours are probably more unique to you. So yes, there is a name for that, and you are DEFINITELY not alone. The whole Earth shares your experiences to a certain degree.

@effyapples8858

6 жыл бұрын

This is probably a very long awaited answer but, it is Synthesia. I experience this too, like if I think of the year, I see a circle of months and I am seeing from the current month.

@larissathegeometer8280

5 жыл бұрын

I do

@skyraven89

5 жыл бұрын

I think you’re just linking memories to specific numbers?

@TaunellE

5 жыл бұрын

In an oppisite way. I cannot feel numbers. I can feel words. But numbers make no sense. To me, they are emotionless and empty. Same with time.

I've always been this way.. at least as long as I remember and as far as I'm told.

It means THOUGHTS BECOME THINGS

I really liked this video and agree with most of what it said, but I believe the underlying point you're trying to make - that this new model of mental function might better explain consciousness - is a bit flawed. I agree that sensory input and ideas are codependent and directly linked. If you point to a cloud in the sky and say "I see a bunny!" that person will probably be able to apply their idea of a bunny to the shape of the cloud and also see the bunny-shape you're talking about. That's all good and well. However, I don't believe this explains our consciousness. The fact that we KNOW that we're thinking about seeing a bunny in the clouds, to me, is true consciousness. We know what we're thinking, and that fact isn't explained away by this new model. This model might explain some of the more taken-for-granted subconscious processes, such as shape recognition, color association, and emotional understanding (empathy, perhaps?), but it does not explain how we can analyze complex scenarios, recite our analysis and every step involved therein, and come to some conclusion about this scenario. Anyway, just my two cents on this video and on this topic in general.

@Kurt634

9 жыл бұрын

Couldn't of said it better myself. Also how can we 'understand' something? How does it come about?

@Mindful2222

9 жыл бұрын

well said

@AlbertStichkaJohn

9 жыл бұрын

If to know or to understand are feelings than the how and the explanation are trivial and self evident. The "know" and the "understand" are novel feelings - the knowing and understanding are cultural and personal patterns with interconnections of words and ideas and they are associated with feelings of knowledge or understanding - throw in a social structure and a person scarcely knows what they know or do not know, but readily believes there is something significant and unexplainable about knowing and understanding. They need not be anything other than what they self evidently are.

@AlbertStichkaJohn

9 жыл бұрын

Albert Stichka Which, in my experience, is implied by the fact that a variety of states of consciousness include modulation of the feeling of being sure or knowing or understanding which can't be proven with any well formed explanatory idea - at least not matching the feeling of knowing or understanding - and these feelings are state and experience dependent.

@ayushjain1443

6 жыл бұрын

The idea of consciousness is debatable, it is relative. So saying that this video does or does not link itself with consciousness is in itself a lack of understanding of the world of psychology. Hence, to conclude, your idea of consciousness may be different from mine, which means you can't define consiousness.

on the mind - body problem - "That even the psychic world, which is so extraordinarily different from the physical world, does not have its roots outside the one cosmos is evident from the undeniable fact that causal connections exist between the psyche and the body which point to their underlying unitary nature." - jung

then can blind people see when dreaming?

@moe.a.4091

9 жыл бұрын

Except that they don't know that their experience is relatable to vision as they don't know how vision looks or feels like.

@silkthyme

9 жыл бұрын

No, they can't. They have never experienced sight. Think about it this way: pigeons can perceive electromagnetic waves. It's such an integral part of their existence that they can't imagine living without it. So when they learn about humans, who cannot perceive electromagnetic waves, they think, "Oh, humans can't perceive electromagnetism in real life, but they must at least perceive it in their dreams, right?" Wrong. Humans have NO inkling of an idea what it would be like to perceive electromagnetic waves, so they cannot dream it up even in their subconscious. Assuming blind people can see when dreaming is like assuming humans can perceive electromagnetism when dreaming.

@pokee9

9 жыл бұрын

It depends, yes. some; who grow into blindness, yes. born blind, doubtful.

@louiejaychan6593

6 жыл бұрын

Blind People can only dream of audios. They do really know that they have eyes, but they are not sure of it.

@TaunellE

5 жыл бұрын

Maybe in their way. No one that is Born blind has ever has schizophrenia.. so who knows..

Although I'm highly intelligent & totally enjoy science documentary & Ted talks (as well as anthropological docs about religion and human life sells eons ago), this topic is quite confusing for me to grasp. I find synesthesia extremely fascinating (unless the sensation is unpleasant as you have no control of either the pleasant or unpleasant sensation because they're just part of the environment) Says this sounds more like some intellectual explaination of Buddhism or something. Thank God スシ Neko summarize and explained it so much better than this whole video "I've always thought this! Everything we perceive and experience is just a construction of the mind! Without the mind there is no substance or meaning to the world, just a timeless void." This still sounds like some type a Depot Chocka Buddhism

I think Autological words play a roll in this as well. I also think that many thoughts share the same highways from brain patterns already made from previous roads plowed. Some people see a lot of cars on the road and others don't--"there's a car!"

since nature has the ability to change, animals must have the ability to adapt (change, mostly after some other change not caused by the animal itself). we animals feel the change because of our thoughts, which come from observing, hearing, smelling or tasting, so we can say that 'change', thoughts and senses are directly related. Stimuli-> sensing-> thinking-> feedback. or in other words: problem-> spotting the problem-> processing(thinking)-> solution-> action. Thoughts are directly related with senses, since thoughts require information to be made from.

@dankonikolic

9 жыл бұрын

This is an interesting perspective. In a nutshell, you described the theory of practopoiesis.

@INameIsGood

9 жыл бұрын

I'm not sure if you are familiar with programming techniques, but when you just begin programming your program goes from start to finish, linearly like in your "problem-> spotting the problem-> processing(thinking)> solution> action." example, But more advanced programs does a lot of it's work at the same time, that's how on modern games you can see everything moving at the same time. I tend to lean towards the model in video. A lot of our "processes" are working simultaneously.

I classify certain ideas, including works of fiction and political ideologies as having different body types.

yes!

this is like how you would associate colors with different subjects like math would be red depending on what color you associate math with

I don't really see this concept as a "new model of consciousness", as stated in 5:15 of the video. It is using the conventional model (i.e. consciousness being a function, or derivative, of the brain) and adding some fresh flavour to it. for an interesting read on the subject, check out: "Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness" by Alva Noe

If these ideas & perceptions are correlated in some way, what would be the theoretical 'root' of it all?

So cool

we`re getting there ;)

What's the name of the painting mentioned in the video?

the brain itself IS the network. more specifically, the conduits of the brain through which electricity flows are the network that mirrors our perceptual reality, which is a synthesis of the material and the ideal interacting with itself.

That instinct mentation emotion sensation may be independent interactions to observation and oneself...post modern ideasthesiaism, 03/20/ 2019

Me: Kiki goes on the roundy one and Bouba in the pointy one! Spciety: You are wrong My opinion: Oh no

@oximas

2 жыл бұрын

you are special then

omg i have that!

How can I get the subtitles?

Very well written accompanied by good, soothing narration. However, I think you're confusing the word COMPREHEND with the word APPREHEND at times. Have a great day :-)

@laurisafine7932

4 жыл бұрын

Yes, I thought so too. Apprehension is fear; comprehension is understanding.

Do you think it's ideasthesia that I 100% associate, for example, the taste of cilantro with a white, empty room or the taste of cumin with a brown blanket?

@elh7149

7 жыл бұрын

Yes

This made me think too hard about the chocolate bar I'm eating.

Just like the theory of Sentient Intelligence by Xavier Zubiri.

Mind/body problem is materialism vs. Idealism basically.

I have always felt that 6 and 7 are the cute couple 9 is sassy and smart everyone wants to be with her 8 is jealous of 6 and seven being a couple. I associate 4 with the colour yellow friendly and charming. 2 is a nerd boy and 1 is I don't care person. Do numbers have personalities?? 😂😂😁

@kennedy.m

3 жыл бұрын

I responded to another comment like this so here is my whole thing with numbers: 8 is the stereotype red-head who has freckles, braces, a big mouth literally and figuratively, who talks too much and is annoying and a bit self-obsessed. 1 by itself is flashy and full of itself, also wears purple eye shadow, and 2 by itself is kind and shy but always in the shadow of one. Put them together, or multiple 1s and the only way I can describe them is snowy. But put multiple 2s together and its someone who isn't bad but you're a little tired of. 7 by itself is cool and chill, a short person. But it you put it with something (like in 27 or 37) it makes you squirm and want to leave. 9 is fine but used to be in your friend group and then sort of joined a different one. You still hang out sometimes but you've grown apart. 3 is sort of like seven but a little odder. He is a tall dude with dark brown hair and prominent but sort of off features. You want to hate 4 because they're annoying but they keep actually being important. 5 is sort of like 3 but more like popping bobba (I know that makes no sense but idk how to describe it). 6 is your sort of friend's sporty and nice little sister, who is also a little quirky and is bright colors like yellows and pinks. I also have outfits of mine I associate with every number up to 12, but it would be too hard to describe. Past 12, there is a whole other complicated personality and feeling that I associate with each digit combination as well. Also as I write this I realize that I make no sense whatsoever I believe it is called OLP (Ordinal Linguistic Personification) and can apply to letters too. It's a type of ideasthesia/synesthesia.

Finally

Could someone please clarify the implications of ideasthesia for the mind-body problem?

@dankonikolic

9 жыл бұрын

Maybe this helps: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideasthesia

@jmerlinb

9 жыл бұрын

Thanks, but I mean more specifically in terms of different approaches to the mind-body problem. If the emergence of qualia from a physical system can be explained by the "mechanisms responsible for extracting the semantics of the surrounding world", does this support e.g. a dualist/materialist/functionalist approach to the mind-body problem. This is the kind of information I am trying to glean.

@dankonikolic

9 жыл бұрын

Ideasthesia suggests that, if one has the ambition to explain qualia by a materialistic (monistic) approach, one has to explain semantics in the same time. The difficulties of understanding semantics are well argued in the J. Searle's Chinese room thought experment. Therefore, according to ideasthesia, the problem of qualia and the problem of semantics are closely related and may be one the same problem.

Everything is a divine chaos, an unfathomable static on God's TV. Then something comes in and suddenly the static starts turning into patterns. Eventually the patterns get so complex that there are human beings in there just like "WTF, WHO AM I". What's real cool is understanding the fact that every concept, idea, sense, or experience you ever have is through a pattern bigger than your own self. That pattern allows you to construct your idea of the world but it will always be just that - your cute little idea of how things apparently "are".

while the first part of this video was quite interesting, it was rather ridiculous to see how they desperately tried to sell this "model of the mind" as new, even though what they presented was just a bundle of superficial ideas that partially have been around since kant. the supposed distinction between sensory perception and complex abstract thought had already been dissolved for a good part, when at least 2 decades ago people with certain lesions were discovered, who were selectively unable to recognize, for example, "animate" objects, but retained their intelligence otherwise. this hinted at the fact, that sensory processing involves quite a bit of abstract information. so: nothing new here, just the the dubious term "ideasthesia".

@dankonikolic

9 жыл бұрын

Yes, the ideas and the evidence pointing to the idea have been around. Please see the Dig Deeper section at the TED-Ed website for more information, where some of the works in philosophy and some empirical evidence are being explained.

@mikewtp

9 жыл бұрын

Yeah, all I could think about was Hume and Kant and the analytic-synthetic distinction.

the seed :)

We're all intrinsically biased. Even the universe is biased towards existing.

How is this different from .. association?

Does this mean that we cannot experience qualia unless we have certain ideas in our mind to begin with? That sounds a bit too far-fetched, because that would mean that babies who lack any knowledge of the world will have very limited if not nonexistent experiences, something vastly different from the way children and adults experience the world. So if what is being said is that our experiences are completely defined by our ideas, then that sounds too extreme. Perhaps what is being said is that our experiences are to some extent influenced by our ideas. That makes more sense but I'll probably say that the ideas which we associate with certain experiences would conjure up certain other experiences when the former are had instead of influencing the former experience itself. If I associate hot with red, for instance, then I may think and conjure up the idea of a hot experience whenever I see that colour, but that does not mean that my red experience itself feels any different or is in some sense shaped by that association. This doesn't mean that the traditional model of sense data first being processed then interpreted by our brains is wrong, but rather that there is an additional set of sense data conjured up by the way our brains interpret this initial sense data.

@dankonikolic

5 жыл бұрын

Yes, this extreme position is what follows from ideasthesia.

@dankonikolic

5 жыл бұрын

Without ideas, there is no qualia.

Like sheeeetttt!!! You learn new things everyday. And i love it! ❤

I use word associations all the time.

I think "Onomatopoeia" is an another good example of Ideasthesia and also "The Dorian Gray Effect". 🤔

Whoaaaa 4000th like.

Basically, you’re an artist.

Hey, what if someone with synesthesia is color blind? What then internet?

@aperson2730

6 жыл бұрын

Al Tahir The Internet is on vacation :-)

i would like to share this video with the English epidemiologist john locke and his blank state theory of the mind. sorry locke Descartes was right :( and if sensory logical connections are innate so the math also is already in somewhere in our brains as Descartes. science has last laugh!!!

i really like how they phrase it as if philosophy and science is working together. Because they are. Specially after that recent big think video where a scientist shit talks philosophy. ; _ ;

I think, therefore I am

kiki is spiky and dangerous an extroverted and green while bouba is soft cute and orange

Magick concepts, science is finally catching up to it's roots...

@RevPeterBecause

7 жыл бұрын

It also helps with purposeful paradigm shifting.

Nhiều người bình luận bằng tiếng anh nhỉ ?

I think I don't have ideasthesia but I think I do have confusesthesia at the kiki and bouaba part Find out whyClose

@thejurassicwarewolf3300

7 жыл бұрын

what why do I have "whyclose" thing on my comment?

Kiki and Bouba are a before and after of the same person, therefore they should be referred to as bibi collectively.

2020: 263

Still, qualia is not explained.

@dankonikolic

5 жыл бұрын

not yet

in spanish!!!

Maybe I'm just not that smart, but I don't see (LOL! Sensory metaphors in action eh?) what's new here. I was under the impression this was already the model we had?

TED-Ed Thanks for great educational channel ***** donut

So basically “synesthesia” is being proven to be people mistaking “strong memory association” for being something different than just that. Linguistics getting in the way of actual reality, again.

That character on 3:46 looks like jackie chan

Dude, this is just called intuition.

How do ideas feel? Take some shrooms and find out

Attention synesthetes! Do you like your condition? To someone who does not have it, it seems really cool and interesting. However, other people who don't have it have actually said it's rather debilitating. What is the opinion of those with the condition?

Marilyn Manson

@notbanditatall

6 жыл бұрын

Sweet dreams are made of this

I don't think. Therefor i'm lazy af

pepper is masculine, salt is feminine

fusiform gyrus, researches can thank me later lol

Bouba sounds like Boobs so it cant be spiky 😅

Hi mom

@duckiebee2831

9 жыл бұрын

Hello honey

I'm bouba

Without thoughts, there is no thinker. Therefore, I am who I think I am.

I call bull. Bb is totally cyan.

@Window4503

8 жыл бұрын

+Joel Carli golden yellow!

so, there is a job for scientist....and for philosophers. For religious, well....God could explain all. ;)

This is not a new idea at all, it´s just a repetition of everything Kant had already said when refuting Descartes, with some lazy experimental science to support it and a fancy name.

@ArcadianGenesis

8 жыл бұрын

+ThePhilosorpheus Why do you think the science is lazy? Even if the idea is not new, don't you think it's progress to be able to demonstrate an old philosophical idea empirically? In doing so, we can learn more than what philosophy alone could ever realize.

This person's voice is yellow. No offense to anyone.

nothing new

This reminds me of psychology..very interesting, but useless.

That character on 3:46 looks like jackie chan