I2t. What? Why? When?: The electric fuse case

Пікірлер: 20

  • @Chris_Grossman
    @Chris_Grossman5 ай бұрын

    Thank you for the theory behind fuses. I have never looked into this. Your talk has inspired me to download and read the Kaufmann paper.

  • @sambenyaakov

    @sambenyaakov

    5 ай бұрын

    Thanks for sharing. The paper is old but still an eye opener.

  • @electronichome1153
    @electronichome11535 ай бұрын

    Finally a good video regarding the melting integral I²t! Thanks Mr.Yaakov, again!

  • @sambenyaakov

    @sambenyaakov

    5 ай бұрын

    👍🙏

  • @Zetex2000
    @Zetex20005 ай бұрын

    Thank you for video. Very interesting and new stuff for me. I always wondered as a kid, why a 1A doesn't melt at 1A. felt like a scam 😂

  • @sambenyaakov

    @sambenyaakov

    5 ай бұрын

    Better than being electrified as I was as a kid🤣. You may be surprised, but many engineers think that a 1A fuse will blow at a little above 1A or that it can protect a MOSFET against overcurrent.

  • @mojiiim.r9446
    @mojiiim.r94464 ай бұрын

    thank you ❤

  • @power-max
    @power-max5 ай бұрын

    I always pondered about modeling a thermal breaker or fuse using a single RC circuit like this and using a low-pass filter of current flow through a shunt and a comparater controlling a pass transistor to make an active fuse, though such chips already exist of course

  • @sambenyaakov

    @sambenyaakov

    5 ай бұрын

    Yes, ST just came out with a controller. But modeling is still important😊

  • @petarsimic4097
    @petarsimic40975 ай бұрын

    great video! as always...

  • @sambenyaakov

    @sambenyaakov

    5 ай бұрын

    🙏🙂

  • @MegaMoriarti
    @MegaMoriarti5 ай бұрын

    Thanks for your explanation

  • @sambenyaakov

    @sambenyaakov

    5 ай бұрын

    So nice of you. Thanks

  • @MegaMoriarti

    @MegaMoriarti

    5 ай бұрын

    Could you model the positive thermal coefficient of the fuse wire, I think the RT region could look like different @@sambenyaakov

  • @sambenyaakov

    @sambenyaakov

    4 ай бұрын

    It can be done by a variale resistor of course. Yes, it might change the shape. This is home work.

  • @analoghardwaretops3976
    @analoghardwaretops39765 ай бұрын

    Considering the case of open loop voltage mode PWM smps..the inverse...i.e. I (current) ×√time (in secs) (1000*1000u secs) can be implemented similarly for a " pulse by pulse" protection thereby emulating the actual I^2t function..... Please share your comments on this..

  • @sambenyaakov

    @sambenyaakov

    5 ай бұрын

    Thank you for comment, but I don't follow. Please eleborate.

  • @analoghardwaretops3976

    @analoghardwaretops3976

    5 ай бұрын

    @@sambenyaakov existing V. mode pwm usually have "peak" C.L. as a protection feature..this is on a pulse by pulse basis.....in an over current fault situation, where over an extended period of time..if this is active..the I^2t of the device or load may be still exceeded, eventually leading to some failure... therefore my reasoning is if such similar protection can be implemented in pwm control , with I(avg/rms)*√t.. , since I is in A/mA and t(on) is in uSecs. such may be easily done with transistor/opamp circuits..

  • @tamaseduard5145
    @tamaseduard51455 ай бұрын

    👍🙏❤️

  • @sambenyaakov

    @sambenyaakov

    5 ай бұрын

    🙏😊👍