An intuitive explanation of ZVS, ZCS and pseudo ZVS
Please note: This video was trimmed to delete a section that included inaccuracies. A corrected version will be uploaded later on. Sorry.
Жүктеу.....
Пікірлер: 32
@GHOTIME10 ай бұрын
Very helpful Professor. Thank you for your continuous effort in spreading knowledge!
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
Thanks
@tseckwr378310 ай бұрын
Thanks again Professor.
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
Thanks
@tamaseduard514510 ай бұрын
👍🙏❤️
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
👍🙏😊
@akosbuzogany275210 ай бұрын
I had a similar issue few weeks ago with a high voltage generator on the primary side of the transformer. Those high current peaks as on the graph at 15:23 didn't seem to appear due the frequency itself, they were rather dependent of the point where the switching met the ringing of the circuit (based on the inductance of the primary coil and the MOSFET capacitance probably). The worst case was when I tried to force the current by turning it on when it had to counteract the current slope generated by the ringing of the preceding excitation. Even if it was not the strongest, first period of the ringing but a later one, the sharp current peaks were present. By tuning the timing of the excitation and the ringing I was able to reduce those peaks near to zero, just as on the upper part of the picture. Could my issue had some completely different cause than you addressed in this presentation? In my circuit there was a simple N-MOSFET pulling down the primary coil.
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing. It appears that the tuning did the job of achieving soft switching.
@chaiyonglim10 ай бұрын
for Buck or Boost converter, beside switching loss, is BCM mode always outperform CCM in term of overall efficiency? Or it limit in low-moderate load current case as BCM need very large ripple results in high Irms*dcr loss?
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
At higher currents the conduction loss increase due to the high rms values.
@aviperi74 ай бұрын
שלום שמואל, תודה רבה על הסרטונים, מעשיר מאוד. אשמח אם אוכל להתייעץ אתך בנוגע למעגל HB ואחריו LC resonance tank, הספק גבוה.
@sambenyaakov
4 ай бұрын
בהחלט. sam.benyaakov@gmail.com
@fala-at10 ай бұрын
Dear Professor, I do not understand why the main loss is the product of drain voltage and current during hard switching turn-on. What with the capacitance parallel to the transistor which is discharging through the transistor during the transistor turn-on?
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
You have keen eyes. Thanks. There is a problem with the explanation. I was carried away. This part was deleted and I plan to post a correction video.
@fala-at
10 ай бұрын
@@sambenyaakov Dear Professor, thank you for the reply. I'm looking forward to this video. I want to precise my question. In kzread.info/dash/bejne/e2uE2K6Mc5DRqqQ.html you describe hard switching turn-on. In simulation results, we can see the current of the transistor (M1) which is the current of the inductor and reverses recovering current of the diode. This current and the transistor voltage cause the switching power losses. But what with the energy stored in the capacitance of the transistor M1 ? Why we do not observe the current which discharge the transistor capacitance like in flyback kzread.info/dash/bejne/e2uE2K6Mc5DRqqQ.html ?
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
You are correct, there is an additional loss due to the discharge of the Coss. I am not sure if LTspice takes tis current into account when plotting the power loss.
@fala-at
10 ай бұрын
@@sambenyaakov thank you.
@hjjeon681210 ай бұрын
Thanks professor. Pls doublecheck the slide 9, it looks the overlap loss waveform of Rg=1ohm needs to be corrected to that of Rg=50ohm.
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
Thanks for comment. I am sorry, but this slide has inaccuracies. I have deleted this section. I will post a correcting video.
@Telectronics10 ай бұрын
If you hit resonance exactly at the LLC converter you destroy your switches from overvoltage right ?
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
No, you dont, The voltage is clamped to the bus and the current depends on the load. Working at a slightly higher frequency than resonance is the best.
@Telectronics
10 ай бұрын
I see then it´s best to put the frequency slightly above resonance for normal operation and for short circuit protection pushing the frequency way higher because as you say we still have ZVS benefit at higher frequencies. Thanks for the nice video !
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
Indeed
@kammarianurag368710 ай бұрын
Sir, in the very first slide you have shown diode across the MOSFET. Is it body diode or external diode because the current direction is reversed.
@sambenyaakov
9 ай бұрын
These are body diodes. he graph shows the magnitude of the current not polarity as is clear from the narration.
@rajatsankhla899310 ай бұрын
Is zvs turn off really helpfull? Why would one do that, if i were to transfer current to upper device.?
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
In PWM converters the duty cycle controls the power transfer so do have to turn on and off the transistors, unless I did not understand the question.
@SergiuCosminViorel10 ай бұрын
But if i need to control the impact of the noise generated by the source, i need fixed frequency of commutation.
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
You mean synchronizing to another source? Well, you can use a variable inductor as in kzread.info/dash/bejne/nKF9xruynbKdoqg.html
@SergiuCosminViorel
10 ай бұрын
@@sambenyaakov I knew about all these, separate aspects, but never thought about putting it together. Very smart!
@panditji882310 ай бұрын
Hi Sir, nay u help to design transformer for flyback converter in step byxstep process.
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
Have you seen kzread.info/dash/bejne/i2SLucxrlLLFmJs.html ?
Пікірлер: 32
Very helpful Professor. Thank you for your continuous effort in spreading knowledge!
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
Thanks
Thanks again Professor.
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
Thanks
👍🙏❤️
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
👍🙏😊
I had a similar issue few weeks ago with a high voltage generator on the primary side of the transformer. Those high current peaks as on the graph at 15:23 didn't seem to appear due the frequency itself, they were rather dependent of the point where the switching met the ringing of the circuit (based on the inductance of the primary coil and the MOSFET capacitance probably). The worst case was when I tried to force the current by turning it on when it had to counteract the current slope generated by the ringing of the preceding excitation. Even if it was not the strongest, first period of the ringing but a later one, the sharp current peaks were present. By tuning the timing of the excitation and the ringing I was able to reduce those peaks near to zero, just as on the upper part of the picture. Could my issue had some completely different cause than you addressed in this presentation? In my circuit there was a simple N-MOSFET pulling down the primary coil.
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing. It appears that the tuning did the job of achieving soft switching.
for Buck or Boost converter, beside switching loss, is BCM mode always outperform CCM in term of overall efficiency? Or it limit in low-moderate load current case as BCM need very large ripple results in high Irms*dcr loss?
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
At higher currents the conduction loss increase due to the high rms values.
שלום שמואל, תודה רבה על הסרטונים, מעשיר מאוד. אשמח אם אוכל להתייעץ אתך בנוגע למעגל HB ואחריו LC resonance tank, הספק גבוה.
@sambenyaakov
4 ай бұрын
בהחלט. sam.benyaakov@gmail.com
Dear Professor, I do not understand why the main loss is the product of drain voltage and current during hard switching turn-on. What with the capacitance parallel to the transistor which is discharging through the transistor during the transistor turn-on?
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
You have keen eyes. Thanks. There is a problem with the explanation. I was carried away. This part was deleted and I plan to post a correction video.
@fala-at
10 ай бұрын
@@sambenyaakov Dear Professor, thank you for the reply. I'm looking forward to this video. I want to precise my question. In kzread.info/dash/bejne/e2uE2K6Mc5DRqqQ.html you describe hard switching turn-on. In simulation results, we can see the current of the transistor (M1) which is the current of the inductor and reverses recovering current of the diode. This current and the transistor voltage cause the switching power losses. But what with the energy stored in the capacitance of the transistor M1 ? Why we do not observe the current which discharge the transistor capacitance like in flyback kzread.info/dash/bejne/e2uE2K6Mc5DRqqQ.html ?
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
You are correct, there is an additional loss due to the discharge of the Coss. I am not sure if LTspice takes tis current into account when plotting the power loss.
@fala-at
10 ай бұрын
@@sambenyaakov thank you.
Thanks professor. Pls doublecheck the slide 9, it looks the overlap loss waveform of Rg=1ohm needs to be corrected to that of Rg=50ohm.
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
Thanks for comment. I am sorry, but this slide has inaccuracies. I have deleted this section. I will post a correcting video.
If you hit resonance exactly at the LLC converter you destroy your switches from overvoltage right ?
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
No, you dont, The voltage is clamped to the bus and the current depends on the load. Working at a slightly higher frequency than resonance is the best.
@Telectronics
10 ай бұрын
I see then it´s best to put the frequency slightly above resonance for normal operation and for short circuit protection pushing the frequency way higher because as you say we still have ZVS benefit at higher frequencies. Thanks for the nice video !
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
Indeed
Sir, in the very first slide you have shown diode across the MOSFET. Is it body diode or external diode because the current direction is reversed.
@sambenyaakov
9 ай бұрын
These are body diodes. he graph shows the magnitude of the current not polarity as is clear from the narration.
Is zvs turn off really helpfull? Why would one do that, if i were to transfer current to upper device.?
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
In PWM converters the duty cycle controls the power transfer so do have to turn on and off the transistors, unless I did not understand the question.
But if i need to control the impact of the noise generated by the source, i need fixed frequency of commutation.
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
You mean synchronizing to another source? Well, you can use a variable inductor as in kzread.info/dash/bejne/nKF9xruynbKdoqg.html
@SergiuCosminViorel
10 ай бұрын
@@sambenyaakov I knew about all these, separate aspects, but never thought about putting it together. Very smart!
Hi Sir, nay u help to design transformer for flyback converter in step byxstep process.
@sambenyaakov
10 ай бұрын
Have you seen kzread.info/dash/bejne/i2SLucxrlLLFmJs.html ?