To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/adumb/. The first 200 of you will get 20% off Brilliant’s annual premium subscription.

@martinwyke

Ай бұрын

There's a certain irony that YouTude named you @Human-279

@MrKingToilet

18 күн бұрын

Sup!

Importantly, this kind of long-form high quality thoughtful analysis can't even be produced by most people much less an AI.

@fergalhennessy775

Ай бұрын

ive seen ai shorts with 1000x the views of this video though

@luminosity8024

Ай бұрын

@@fergalhennessy775 tis luck in the algorithm

@silviocupica2521

Ай бұрын

​@@fergalhennessy775They are talking about quality, not success

@fergalhennessy775

Ай бұрын

@@silviocupica2521 nobody goes to yt shorts for quality lil bro

@Dismuth

Ай бұрын

@@fergalhennessy775 You agree with him and then call him lil bro? ok kid

Plot twist, it turns out that adumb himself is an extremely sophisticated ai.

@jellyplays100

18 күн бұрын

Yes

@bigoof.look.at.my.desc.

17 күн бұрын

_audible gasp_

@box_speedruns

16 күн бұрын

Yes

@1_in_8billion

23 сағат бұрын

Yes

dude getting a sponsor in just your fifth ever video is such a huge flex

@Trifect69420

10 күн бұрын

Brilliant basically sponsors any educational channel lol

@dragonifyamazing2721

15 сағат бұрын

@@Trifect69420 to be honest you are accurate. I have seen Brillant sponsorships from other educational channel. Not as much flex.

Actually nuts that you managed to get nearly 500 subscribers in a month on an AI channel

@leftysheppey

Ай бұрын

@@youbetyourwrasse if you like the content then what's the issue?

@orterves

Ай бұрын

People love junk food.

@thedistinguished5255

Ай бұрын

thats how much subs i got on my youtube channel that i put weekly effort into between ages 14 and 17. not that im jealous or anything..

@leftysheppey

Ай бұрын

@@thedistinguished5255 tbf, short form content is a much easier way to get subs than long form

@GravyMustard

Ай бұрын

Nuts 😋

Congrats on getting sponsored already, your projects are awesome

Dude, you your creations are really next level man!

I'm sure I've come across a few of your reels before on youtube 😂😂

@orterves

Ай бұрын

It's a real fight to get the algorithm to stop suggesting ai generated garbage

@icyboyy6177

Ай бұрын

On KZread they are called shorts 🤓☝️

@zalox12

10 күн бұрын

​@@icyboyy6177nice face reveal.

nicely done, showing pros and cons of an automated channel with actual data

This was a very interesting idea and the execution was amazing. Good video!

Don't think I really understood just how accessible this has all come when you can automate entire channels with AI already. Really interesting video and great motivation for me to continue studying Python :D

@yougeo

19 күн бұрын

Uhhh...you get the AI to run python. You don't write it yourself.

@opposing

5 күн бұрын

​@@yougeo You do write yourself the code, the AWS instance he created didnt appear magically

Great video. I really appreciate the approach and thoroughness

This channel is really cool, man! Looking forward to seeing what you do next!

This was so good! Thanks for making this

This is a real gem of a channel. I love seeing this content, and you really inspire me to work on some cool hacks like this too!

Honestly, using a script for editing but doing actual voiceover and research would split the difference on what matters.

this is extremely interesting! keep up the good work

Very, very insightful analysis of a “real life” experiment, comparing the performance of an LLM versus a human. My take is that currently LLMs excel on quantity with “good enough quality “, but LLMs do not seem capable of “excellent” or “brilliant” performance. That conclusion looks intuitive to me: when I look at the output of any of the LLMs I’ve tested so far, I do get something that looks as the “average opinion/knowledge” of what I see on the internet using a search engine. Thinking about how LLMs operate, this is what I expect: the tokens with the highest probability are those that are found most often on the internet (this is also the cause for bias). Thus, documents published by exceptional people (let’s say, some genius) will receive a very low probability of being generated by the LLM. Anyway, I really enjoyed a lot this video, and I surely be looking for your future videos.

@kylebroflovski6382

Ай бұрын

LLM's (unintentionally) are an exceptional way of representing the collective unconscious of WEIRD countries (Westernized, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) and GPT 4 manifests this intangible "average" pretty eloquently. The problem with this lies in the famous quote by Schopenhauer: "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." Which is to say that yes, until the gears of society shift to accept the currently exceptional as codified and self-evident, the exceptional will remain fringe and speculative - outside the radar of LLM's. Although the same (speculative and fringe) attributes can be assigned to the unfalsifiable ramblings of a conspiracy theorist. The benefit of humans is that we can physically test hypothesis in the real world and receive actual feedback and experience, and this is what differentiates genius from actual insanity: truth - both in terms of accuracy, precision, and frequency. The point here is that to excel in excellence or brilliance, an AI (or AGI, to be more precise) would need to: 1. Be able to interact with the outside world and receive appliable feedback and experience from those interactions. 2. Be able to transfer that feedback to different (or unique, if taken one step further) scenarios, in essence mimicking the executive function and higher-level cognition of humans. (GPT 4 can already do the former, to an extent.) 3. Push boundaries and consequently face doubt, mockery, ridicule, or even violent opposition from the conclusions it generates. Speaking of speculation, since we're on the subject of hypothetical future AGI, I feel it helps to have a rough idea of the difference between consensus truth, empirical truth, and axiomatic truth. In my opinion fields like psychology, political science, ethics, economics, etc are too "fuzzy" for AI to have an opinion on, or to try to influence - at least until we have a complete mapping of the human brain and can understand more empirically how the brain works in its entirety. Until then its genius should remain confined to pushing the envelope on empirical and axiomatic truth.

A really neat video idea!!! Love your channel! Keep going!

Amazingly implemented.

This guy rocks! Amazing video

This is like a mathematical proof for the dead internet theory. I think of it being like checkers. Yes, checkers is a solved game mathematically, but we still haven't mapped out all moves. Thus, it still requires plenty of skill to play and be good at it.

dude this was such interesting and high quality video, well done

Awesome video, as a dev myself I was wondering if it's possible to create something like this. Hope you will make it on this chanel with more interesting projects!

I can't find it, but I remember that KZread had something in the terms of service against automated content (or perhaps against monetizing it). It's possible I misremember, but even if I do I think KZread would be likely to add something like that to its TOS if purely automated content had the potential to go viral.

@nathanielguggenheim5522

Ай бұрын

Prtobably them Simps working there have no way to detect it.

@asdads3948

Ай бұрын

It would probably be good for everyone... except youtube. What's the difference from youtubes pov? They have content that generates views. Why would they care if it is human or AI generated?

@Lewtable

Ай бұрын

@@asdads3948 Probably reducing bloat on the servers? The problem isn't that they get a couple of viral bot channels that make them money, the problem are the millions upon millions of bot channels that do nothing but take up space on their servers. Because lets be real here, if you can fully automate a channel people won't just have one channel. There will be bot farms with 100+ channels constantly uploading junk content daily that all belong to the same group of people, multiply that by many groups doing the same thing and the situation can quickly become unsustainable. Banning fully automated channels from receiving money won't stop all channels, as there probably would be loopholes but it will stop a lot of people from even attempting it.

might be worth re-doing this experiment now with GPT4 and more sophisticated tools overall

5:13 pov gen alpha: yay

We need to all band together to agree on a protocol when we come across an AI video. Either instantly scroll past, or dislike and then scroll past.

@hexyellow9873

22 күн бұрын

I usually block the AI channel and then scroll past the video.

Your content is top notch, keep going and growing my guy.

Youre still underrated as hell

Clipclamp or whatever it’s called is useful because it can make short videos using stock footage and it already has a voice and it adds music

Plot twist: this is the ai channel

@bigoof.look.at.my.desc.

17 күн бұрын

_audible gasp_

Bro your channel is really interesting, you have high quality informative content, and I know how hard and time consuming it is

this was very interesting, good video

BUT YOU COULD JUST REQUEST the quotable api so it generates a random quote each time.

@nxmee

Ай бұрын

Based on the diagram in the "complete automation" section, that's exactly what they did

tbh i don't like automated channels i usualy block them i am on KZread for the people behind the videos :)

Really facinating. Also, i've got an idea. Maybe if you were to make some human made content for some time, you can reach the monetization threshold and continue automation from there.

Tuvok was a great choice for the voice over AI.

Great video. Horribly depressing.

@ZlectroTMTeamAzerty

Ай бұрын

We are clearly doomed

@mummyjohn

Ай бұрын

the opportunity to find something inspiring, and yet you go for depressing.

@gavine2363

Ай бұрын

Only if people decide computer > human

@oberonpanopticon

26 күн бұрын

@@gavine2363Obviously it has already been decided

@ThePenisMan

11 күн бұрын

@@mummyjohn what’s inspiring about people subscribing to dumb shit Not everything needs a positive spin and that’s coming from someone who despises cynicism

Seems like this vid couldn't hack it in the algo but I really enjoyed it.

You're the NileRed of programming lol

@DavidN172

Ай бұрын

bro the voice is literally the exact same

You could run the experiment a second time with completely new channels but incorporating everything learned from the first run. After introducing the new style of quote of the day videos on the ai channel, it gained a significant boost in subscribers. Restarting the experiment, you could try to investigate how helpful this boost was in the long term.

Incredible video, deserves more attention

Man flexing he can make a large yt channel from scratch, but chooses to stay with this format for his integrity, hats off

I think some kind of combination would rock though

... I swear to god I've seen the short you showed in this video. (Specifically the quote one..)

Btw a tip for this videos thumbnail: include some text like ‘can AI beat a human?’ in it, really anything related to the videos topic that is decently clickbait-y. I think this will increase the amount of views you’ll get by quite a lot.

Man i hope you make it because i love the content

Great video!

The king has returned

2:04 The first suggestion from GPT reads like it's telling people "Don't go towards death. Become Death for others." Is it suggesting people should kill others? LMAOO

how does this only have 8k views 😭😭😭 this deserves millions fr

Very useful experiment!

"ass=subtitles.ass" 💀???

@everypizza

2 ай бұрын

.ass is a respected file format

@Jp6g0

Ай бұрын

a s s

@sofia.eris.bauhaus

Ай бұрын

only a fool would disrespect the ass. …or something 😛.

Wow, this is such an interesting experiment! I love how you've created two distinct channels to compare the success they would achieve. It's fascinating to see the combination of handmade videos and AI-generated content in action. Both approaches have their own unique qualities and advantages. The handmade videos bring a personal touch and creativity that can truly resonate with viewers. The effort, time, and craftsmanship involved in creating them can be appreciated, and it adds an element of authenticity to the content. On the other hand, the AI-generated channel offers a different perspective, leveraging the power of technology to generate intriguing quotes and facts. It's amazing to witness how AI can contribute to content creation. I'm excited to see the results of this experiment and discover which channel garners more success. It's a great opportunity to explore the preferences of the audience and understand the impact of different content creation methods. Kudos to you for pushing the boundaries and exploring new avenues in content creation. Keep up the fantastic work, and I'll be eagerly following both channels to see how they progress! (Written by ChatGPT)

3:10 “ass=subtitles.ass” 😂

I feel like this kind of stuff would work better with reddit stories rather than quotes.

What if you create 10+ accounts to play the lottery youtube game in the attempt one go viral? (each account would have a different video, but the same style)

underrated video good job ur very cool subbed

Plot twist this video was made by AI

Simply brilliant!

What I got from this: Using automation to speed up the editing process is more effective than letting an AI make the entire video

here's a better idea for this project : if you upload one good quality human made video once a week and let the ai make two videos everyday this will make people get subscribed to you from the quality video while watching the ai videos so ur channel doesn't become idle this way the youtube algorithm will get your videoes suggested much more.

Do you plan on doing the experiment with long form contents?

do the youtube analytics tell you how many people click "don't recommend channel" it would be in interesting metric to compare for the human vs ai content if you can. I hit "don't recommend channel" for a lot of automated content, since the content isn't good, and the AI readers still don't seem to get sentence structure properly. They can't emphasise words correctly in a sentence, which is particularly maddening when they try to read stories.

You could vastly improve the ai videos just by using better ai music and ai voice just with the huge improvement in ai since this video came out

This is the beginning of the dead internet theory

I would have liked to know how much the AWS cost for that pipeline was. I'm guessing not that much.

Google's "I'm feeling curious" is a really nice fun fact generator

A pretty interesting stuff. Your content is really awesome

The most amazing thing about this is that google didnt immediately delete the channel

Came here after watching your Wikipedia video…I think I just lost the rest of the workday to catching up on your channel 😂

@my2cents2u

Ай бұрын

same

The conclusions about quality by each method are unsurprising, though I'm inclined to think that the relative effort required far more than makes up for the difference, no? Your graphs at 11:38 seem to bear this out. If the goal was strictly to monetize from youtube directly, indeed this isn't a useful structure, but then monetizing from youtube directly is a pretty foolish goal IMO. I'd think building a regular audience that can then be leveraged elsewhere (merchandising? creating a consumer/email list for something else?) is a better way to go. Curious your (or anyone's) thoughts.

Bro the volume just went up for some reason on my phone and its loud AF

you were so concerned with whether or not you could, you never stopped to consider whether or not you should

ai replaced the prayer service reflection at my school. not even religion is safe from the ai apocalypse

It shouldn't be one or another. We should take the best of both worlds. We can come up with the creative and original ideas and use AI tooling to speed up the production process

Great Video. These kinds of automated videos are just the worst type of "content". I am surprised that anybody subscribed to these channels. These videos are just spam that fill up hard drives in some data centers. There are some automated channels that copy and paste questions from stack overflow and also the featured answere. No need to say that these videos completely lack any quality, have no context and the creators have no clue what they are talking about.

You've earned a sub

If you wanted to make the AI part a bit smarter, train it to optimise both views and subs, and adjust its content accordingly

Try making the ai auto post videos and bulk post like hundreds of them

were the Only Up clips royalty free, or did you take them from some random streamers? i guess if you really wanted to automate it you could also have a robot play the game

Human has a advantage in quality

overall interesting experiment, I feel like AI channel subs possibly influenced by bots.

@Keyw

Ай бұрын

we can only hope

Did you consider using OpenAI API to avoid manually interacting with ChatGPT?

Quoting myself: The ai just cant compete with the target audiance's content

Almost 13 hours and this video is still at 900 views. :(

Amazing vid

Which video editing tool do you use to make your KZread videos on this channel? :)

This is extremely pertinent at this time since KZread, as of 4/5/24, has blocked all ad blocking software on Android. I have been using Adblock, Adblock Plus and the Adblock browser on my devices for years. All of a sudden I am getting loud, _long_ adverts before and during videos. The only way I can interrupt them is to refresh the Adblock browser several times. I wouldn't mind paying a nominal fee to go ad free on YT, but the only option is to pay _$13.99 per month_ for YT premium. I don't need movies and TV. I just don't want to be rudely jarred out of meditation or sleep with my heart pounding. Imaging relaxing to the sounds of bilateral music to calm my ADHD, and all of a sudden someone is yelling in my ear. I am now desperately seeking an alternative. :-/

@MrDelord39

Ай бұрын

Try newpipe or KZread revanced.

Good luck 🙏

1:27 “1 *4* 2 3” (Keep going your doing great) (Just a little more) This pains me so much 😭😭😭 (also thanks to the ppl who scrolled all the way down here. You dedication is 🔛🔝)

3:09 don’t look at the second line of code

I did the same thing, but I quickly realized it would cost quite a bit of money and probably never generate it back. How much money did this experiment cost?

I wish you had given the actual amount of money you made from each channel... that is an important piece of the puzzle

you should redo this video at some point in the future to see whats changed as more AI tools become available and existing ones get better (or worse in some cases)

I think it would also be fair to give AI feedback in numbers of views so it can improve its videos somehow. I suppose it would be hard, but maybe then it would have some viral videos and thousands of views.

Crazy to think that soon with AI video, we won’t even need these steps…

Now, this seems as a cool channel!

Monetising shorts is actually damn hard, Google is keeping so much money