Understand the context shaping wars and international affairs with Ground News. Go to ground.news/binkov and subscribe for 30% off their unlimited access Vantage plan or $1/month for their starter package.

@vanhoot2234

3 ай бұрын

just a small note of correction I think Ukraine actually has two patriot missle systems.

@js70371

3 ай бұрын

Binkov’s final cope lol

@TheRezro

3 ай бұрын

Random note. Do other people also notice clear paralel between this war and Earth-Romulan was in Star Trek?

@JoeBlow-wr5em

3 ай бұрын

Nato targets civilians, Russia claims to denazify, yet released azov from Mariupol. This war makes no sense!

@charleshebdo9764

3 ай бұрын

Putin would most probably use tactical nukes onto NATO troops near the Donbass or Crimea, just to project strength. He has little accountability in the incipient 2nd gen soviet block. China has ensured the sanctions have mostly failed, and the UN has no flexing power. NATO would not have any grounding for launching ICBMS against Russia if no NATO nations have been attacked.

Do yourself a favor and stay out of the comments.

@bumponalog7164

2 ай бұрын

Too many people believe war propaganda.

@thegermanfool8953

2 ай бұрын

Saw this comment before reading others and decided Imma just stop here.

@carlharper557

2 ай бұрын

You stay out

@MrLougarou1000

2 ай бұрын

Nah come get that smoke

@MrLougarou1000

2 ай бұрын

@@thegermanfool8953 good idea German.

Just my opinion but the world was a bit better when all the wars were hypothetical. 😊

@carlharper557

2 ай бұрын

Tell russia maybe you can consider that

@crazedvole

2 ай бұрын

@@carlharper557 I tried to email them, but they never responded. Maybe it went to their spam folder. 🤔🤔

@Su-27_433

2 ай бұрын

@@carlharper557 USA*

@Nexon44444

2 ай бұрын

@@Su-27_433 both of these suckers. Russia and US both like to start wars they lose

@oof9420

2 ай бұрын

​@@Su-27_433definitely, Ukraine and USA should have thought before provoking Russia

It would look like mushroom clouds and severe mental illness

@abraham2172

2 ай бұрын

Mushroom clouds in russia at least.

@Ravi9A

2 ай бұрын

@@abraham2172 implying you will escape lol

@kaihiwatari3841

20 күн бұрын

​@@abraham2172 russia has better and more nukes that usa

“Anyone who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” - Voltaire

@kevinnikolov4418

2 ай бұрын

Yap like the west propaganda , cnn , bbc et

@discipleofdagon8195

2 ай бұрын

Russia Today and Russia Media Monitor be like

@ericb.4358

Ай бұрын

@@discipleofdagon8195 Or Trump. jus' sayin'...

@giusepperossi699

29 күн бұрын

Like!

Doesn't article 5 only come into play if a country declares war against a NATO member? If a nato member involves themselves in a war, i dont think other memebers are obligated to join. So if Poland, for example, were to send expeditionary forces into Ukraine, no other NATO members need to act.

@artruisjoew5473

3 ай бұрын

only if a member is attacked, in any capacity, by any state or none state actors. the precedent is already set by the US when we triggered article 5 against Afghanistan.

@zayedbinimran957

3 ай бұрын

​@@artruisjoew5473 that's was when the usa was attacked

@palar4195

2 ай бұрын

nato states will do the US bidding. forget 'bout letter and spirit of agreements, they are written not for commoners crowd.

@Khazar321

2 ай бұрын

@@palar4195 you mean like the NATO minimum GDP % for the war economy that most countries were ignoring for decades? You people are so delusional it's hilarious.

@rickysampson8759

2 ай бұрын

They used article 5 in Libya after france invaded

You know it's a good informative video when Russia send an army of troll and bots imediatly after it's uploaded 😂

@theiranianputin2770

3 ай бұрын

At your service 😂

@EsKimoS0

3 ай бұрын

I guess the interview really opened some mines after years of brainwashing

@aniksamiurrahman6365

3 ай бұрын

Nice to see NAFO bots like you coping hard. What else a loser do but hurling insult to the winning side?

@paulrasmussen3858

3 ай бұрын

You are the trolling bot.

@cjgamer2140

3 ай бұрын

This video was so good and informative, that Putin sent me here to tell you it's not.

You don't go in with the bare minimum. You go in with overwhelming force strength so the enemy feels grateful when you pull up on their border and announce you'll go no further.

@Grimloxz

2 ай бұрын

🤦🏾‍♂️

@themarcineuu1336

2 ай бұрын

And then you get 200+ nukes in your face

@mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520

2 ай бұрын

Because that worked in Iraq and Vietnam

@Shoelessjoe78

2 ай бұрын

​​@@mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520at what point did anyone go in full force in either Iraq or Vietnam remind us...

@softdrink-0

2 ай бұрын

@@mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520 1. Iraq was never lost and, 2. We never fully committed to Afghanistan or Vietnam

Holy insanity!!! Nukes incoming or what.

@sheeit-co3co

2 ай бұрын

Yeah to Moscow

@TroIIingThemSoftly

2 ай бұрын

No.

Interesting video, however, I have some criticism for your hypothetical situation. Such an intervention of NATO would clearly create a reaction from Russia. Not a nuclear one, but a reaction that would change how Russia would fight the war. It seems that in your video NATO intervention would strike Russia very little. No further conscription, movement towards a war economy, a recognition of war or anything. In your video, it seems that NATO just sends some troops and fighters into Ukraine and Russia just fights and acts like nothing happened. The only exceptions of course is, Russia declaring war on NATO or starting a nuclear war.

@MuffHam

3 ай бұрын

NATO is not ready for a war with Russia. The real reason ammo and shells have stopped. Isnt political or financial. Its because there isnt much left to send. NATO cant produce the amount of shells and ammo needed. NATO's military Industrial complex is profit focused and cannot ramp up production. Russia can and is producing enough ammo and shells. Russias military industrial complex is designed for ramping up producation and its state owned. NATO may theoretical have more military might. But its spread across dozens of armies. Only the USA is a match military to Russia. But the USA lost its production capacity that helped win WW2. Russia still has that capability.

@darthsidius9631

3 ай бұрын

But the question is what Russia could do? They had riots when last official conscription happened and they have already prompted up their military industry and are having problems because of these two factors. How much more they can do?

@unitforce7417

3 ай бұрын

Russia is already doing everything they can to win, they are breaking rules of the un and commit war crimes they cannot escalate further

@mastersafari5349

3 ай бұрын

@@darthsidius9631 But the direct NATO involvement would legitimize the war effort and consolidate the population around Putin and it would suddenly justify all the myths of the West planning to conquer Russia.

@jakemocci3953

3 ай бұрын

@@darthsidius9631 America has seasonal race riots over dead criminals, and Russia had no problem raising 400k men.

Blinkov, would you kindly do a Russian response say with NK, Iran, or even China support similar to NATO's?

one point missed in this video is that if NATO countries escalate the war to such an extent that doesn't warrant a nuclear strike from Russia, Russia can use tactical nuclear strikes within ukraine that can affect the areas in the radius of 100-200 km therefore averting the total nuclear war and also responding to the NATO escalation at the same time

@Nazzyyyy

3 ай бұрын

Nato has nukes aswell

@cosmincasuta486

3 ай бұрын

You obvious have no clue!!!! Russia WILL NEVER make a first strike, but, when the first dtrike is done by an opposite part Russia will react WITH ALL WHAT THEY HAVE!!!! We all die, you 1d10ts!

@cosmincasuta486

3 ай бұрын

@@Nazzyyyy And of course a lot of geunine 1d10ts like you!

@a24396

3 ай бұрын

A "tactical" nuke isn't going to be very effective against a military unit in the field - they'll be dug in, dispersed, and have protective equipment. So, you're not going to see effects radically greater than what a conventional weapon would cause at the tactical unit level. Therefore, to achieve the outsized effect that nukes are capable of providing, that means targeting something "softer" and more "strategic" like air bases, logistics facilities, rail yards, etc. Except those tend to be co-located with large civilian populations... And russia using a nuke to take out an airbase on the outskirts of Kiev or Liviv (etc.) is going to devastate those cities - at least from the perspective of fallout and radiation injury to the civilian populations, even if the fires caused and the blast damage suffered, are limited. And given the cycle of escalation we've already seen, it's exceedingly unlikely the West would not respond in some way to that. The unfortunate fact] about nukes is this: Ultimately there's no real way to use a "tactical" nuke without causing an escalation to strategic warfare in very short order; with the civilization-threatening consequences that entails. This is why most of the people charged with nuclear decision-making conclude there are no real use cases that make the massive investment in weapons we can't really use worthwhile compared to putting that investment into conventional weapons instead.

@that.schamp

3 ай бұрын

@@cosmincasuta486 No we don't all die. We are 1.5 Billion people spreads across three continents.... But all the ethnic moscovites will die - with the few remnant moscovite populations being subjugated by ethnic minorities who have centuries of grievances against them.

The will just is not there for a full scale NATO intervention. At most, Ukraine will receive a higher level of aid than it has to date. I know this is hypothetical, but it's mostly useless speculation imo as so much of this is so far outside the pale.

So you need a unified coalition response on the scale of the invasion of Iraq in Desert Storm. That would almost certainly force a nuclear respons. So no !

@gordonipock9385

3 ай бұрын

Russia could easily defeat NATO in a battle of conventional arms. It's NATO who would resort to nukes. That's the only chance they got. It took months for the US to move its heavy armor, artillery and troops to Iraq for both wars. And both times they had a friendly place to dock their ships in Kuwait and Saudi where they could unload and assemble. Russia would never let these US ships cross the Atlantic. Also, the US would have to pull its forces and equipment out of Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Persian Gulf countries and from Korea. They can't do that for strategic reasons. In reality the US and its NATO vassals combined could send a 100,000 man infantry force to Ukraine. Putin could handle them with just his Chechens.

@gordonipock9385

3 ай бұрын

Obama knew that the US could not challenge Russia in Ukraine because all the logistics strongly favored Russia. This is why he didn't bother sending serious weapons there. Obama would have never provoked this war the way Biden -- the corrupt idiot -- did. Truth be told, Biden got us into this mess to protect his family's criminal financial interests there.

@artruisjoew5473

3 ай бұрын

@@gordonipock9385 then why does Putin screams nuke every time NATO sends anything? sending tanks? threaten a nuclear war. sending planes? threaten a nuclear war. and he never actions on it too. nobody believes him now hes cried nuke a few too many times.

@boom-wj1gt

3 ай бұрын

​@@gordonipock9385ok but they can simply use European or friendly country's as a staging ground of a land war and use the navy to harass russia in the east with alaska or attack in two fronts I don't know the geography of this I'm just basing this on a simple world map We already know that their navy is not that well maintained and I wonder the effectiveness of russian subs other than in paper

@wenomechainsamatumajarbisaun69

2 ай бұрын

@@gordonipock9385 how delusional, cope harder

Binkov hasn't been right about anything happening in Ukraine, just look back at his previous videos.

@MrLougarou1000

2 ай бұрын

I like Binkov, I've been looking at other videos for accuracy and sadly this is dawning on me.

@jeanmuyuela8112

2 ай бұрын

@@Nick_Zan prop asset? How. In some of his videos, people claim he is russian propaganda and some other ukrain lol. He is just analysing and what he think is needed if x = y. Sadly you people are too dumb to see that.

@deprogramm

2 ай бұрын

That’s true, he expected Russia to win very early on.

@donpedro00769

Ай бұрын

Yeah like 98% of the people lol. Everyone was talking about how the 2nd or 3rd strongest country would destroy Ukraine....problem is, no one expected them to be this incompetent with there logistics and strategies. Heck some generals didn't even immediately realize they were attacking them lol

@donpedro00769

Ай бұрын

Also, like he said pretty damn early in the video. This is a highly HYPOTHETICAL video. Soo it really is only for entertainment like a lot of his videos

The policy of the Collective West: Scholz: we will supply Scholz: we will not supply Scholz: we will supply Scholz: we will not supply

@MuLLeR029

2 ай бұрын

Scholz: we will supply Scholz: we will not supply Scholz: we will supply Scholz: we will not supply Scholz: we will supply Scholz: we will not supply

@J--12

Ай бұрын

@@MuLLeR029 The actual Scholz policy is forfeiting any interests of his own country for the sake of US interests, with zero payoff for himself or his fellow countrymen.

Operation Barbarossa 2.0

@iamaim2847

3 ай бұрын

Because last one went so well.

@Shimra8888

3 ай бұрын

@@iamaim2847 some people … Western European people specifically … don’t seem to learn from history it seems.

@J--12

Ай бұрын

@@iamaim2847 Dude compared NATO to Nazis and thought them to be in the right, you can't make this shit up.

I’ll save you all 23 minutes and tell you what it would look like with one phrase: WW3 Lets not start WW3

@nicolasmella8450

3 ай бұрын

Nah it is time to remind the russians that their only victory was ww2, not one other great victory in their history and it will remain that way

@7deEspadas

3 ай бұрын

Dude, Tzar Alexander got into Paris

@saveme443

3 ай бұрын

@@nicolasmella8450 what did us won btw?

@sheeit-co3co

3 ай бұрын

Why? Scared of Russia 😂

I think what NATO should do is to send their troops to Ukraine but not directly to the frontlines but just to secure fhe borders , at least with Belarus and Transnistria, that would make the situation much better for Ukraine

@J--12

Ай бұрын

lmao they are afraid to send too much weapons and you say they should send troops, yeah right, the only way that happens is if anyone they sending will be guarding some outhouse far away from frontlines.

If NATO gets involved, then that will be the end of everything. Let us hope and pray that never happens.

How are the comments still a battlefield here lol

@jakemocci3953

3 ай бұрын

Nafo seething that A) the war is lost B) normal westerners have no appetite for escalation

@AwesomeRepix

3 ай бұрын

Russian web brigades seething that A) people are scared and coping with what happens next so the best way is to be rude to everyone else B) normal easterners don't like human rights and freedom of expression and just about everything else like democracy

@boom-wj1gt

3 ай бұрын

Dude get down it's not safe here

@terjeoseberg990

2 ай бұрын

@@boom-wj1gt, LOL

@terjeoseberg990

2 ай бұрын

All the paid trolls are out at full force.

TL;DR: Not going to happen. Beautiful fantasies, though. ;)

@donpedro00769

Ай бұрын

Why click the video then lmao

@Kangoshi_ru

Ай бұрын

@@donpedro00769 To find out what it's about?

The initial preposition that funding and equipment have been adequate is incorrect. They have been slow, insufficient and lag Ukraines own assessments of needs.

the amount of cope NAFO channels have been putting out since 2 weeks ago is pretty insane. You guys okay?

@MrLougarou1000

2 ай бұрын

The Ukrainian front line has fallen. Russian gains can be measured by the mile.

@4inNashinal

2 ай бұрын

and russian loses measured by what?@@MrLougarou1000

@kieranbrien3989

2 ай бұрын

hopefully not zelensky, i'm pretty sure he cant count or add up@@4inNashinal

@TroIIingThemSoftly

2 ай бұрын

LOL, pure projection. Love it.

@TroIIingThemSoftly

2 ай бұрын

@@MrLougarou1000 Been hearing that for two years now, vatnik 🤡🤡

Ukraine flying missions that start from NATO countries' bases is not an escalation. Russia already did this very thing when it invaded from the territory of Belarus in 2022.

@SteveVJones

2 ай бұрын

Exactly, its rules for thee but not for me

@epicguy-nk7dd

2 ай бұрын

but it is an escalation? literally using the airports of countries that arent fighting in the war

@stinkypete891

2 ай бұрын

Then what’s stopping NATO from doing it? They’re afraid they will lose all their aircraft and airfields, that is what will happen.

@privatebandana

2 ай бұрын

Yes and Ukraine tried to engage them, which means Russia could then engage them inside NATO countries.. if you don't consider that an escalation you're just delusional.

@corvendallas8838

2 ай бұрын

Yes, it is. It's all been escalations from NATO, starting by the coup d'etat they financed in 2014 "for freedom and democracy" (who believes this BS anymore?). It's clear NATO wants to weaken Russia to tear it apart and take its fuel and mineral resources. Whoever thinks otherwise, maybe its time to turn off your Netflix a little and live in the real world.

What's the use of NATO when it is reluctant if not refusing to help, indecisiveness will bring it to its downful.

@J--12

Ай бұрын

Good.

Nato should donate more old equipment to Ukraine they have a ton of it Germany , Norway and Denmark 🇩🇰 are an economic powerhouse theh can donate enough weapons n money

Регулярно вся Европа хочет российскую землю и Россия ее дает - по три метра каждому. Тевтонцы, французы, немцы не дадут соврать.

Ukraine is just next door to Russia, I still can’t get over how Russia failed to take over it.

@realpolitiksanta5980

3 ай бұрын

It was never there intention to take it completely over. Hence the invasion only began with 180,000 troops. Putin expected negotiations to start, which were at the beginning stages in March of 2022, until the west ended them.

@user-ib9ky2jo9h

3 ай бұрын

@@realpolitiksanta5980 🤡

@PhysicsGamer

3 ай бұрын

@@realpolitiksanta5980 Ah yes, an entire armor column closing in on the capital of a country isn't trying to "take it completely over". Fortunately, the Russian army showed shocking incompetence and the Ukrainian people impressive resilience.

@nishantyadav5992

3 ай бұрын

​@@PhysicsGamerare U dumb enough to believe that an armour column of 25000 troops and few armour vehicles will take a city of population more than 2 million

@sup2320

3 ай бұрын

First turn off CNN and BBC. Second, understand what their military objectives are.. Taking and holding land is very different than completely pulverizing a nation. Russia technically, without nukes, could absolutely level every major urban center in ukraine through overwhelming air bombardments, but that would be heavily counterproductive politically. But ukraine is winning, so you got nothing to worry about :)

Ample??? You might want to do more research.

Binkov, I don't understand: for two years we have been told that Russuan troops have poor morale and low training levels. In addition lots of Western reports have said that Russia is running out on missiles and artillery shells. In addition, both Jens Stoltenberg the Nato Secretary General as well as Anthony Blinken the US Secretary of State have repeatedly said that "the Russian Army is the second best Army in Ukraine". Now you are discussing deploying NATO forces to Ukraine??? We have been told repeatedly that Ukraine is winning! Surely then the logical conclusion is that somebody has been.lying to us! Does that include you Binkov?

@sirati9770

2 ай бұрын

russia has solved these issues to a high degree unfortunately. poor morale they have not, but they will murder their own troops if they dont fight as if they hard morale ukraine is still winning. however the US infighting is making munitions extremely difficult. ukraine is more effective, but russia has more men, equipment, munitions, and money. that ukraine can hold russia off makes it the "second best army". yet that is more than a meme than something to strategic value

@anonanon7235

2 ай бұрын

Clearly Binkov has an agenda. You are precisely correct in the sense that all his previous videos are anti-Russian...and pro-West. He's been wrong so many times.

@jeremyzzz5067

2 ай бұрын

Every Ukrainian retreat is a tactical victory and every time Russia advances it is a strategic loss. 🤡 You may support anyone just don’t fall for the propaganda. Obvious stuff is obvious.

@Nico-iv3wr

2 ай бұрын

​@@sirati9770In a war, with the martial law, it's pretty normal to face consequences, even getting shot, if you disobey the orders, that includes both Russia and Ukraine. Ukraine is not winning the war at all, they're holding the Russians, sure, but they clearly have no chance to retake everything that was taken from them. Ukraine will win only the moment they retake Crimea, which is impossible. Russia cannot be defeated there and NATO cannot expand to Ukraine as long as it has territorial disputes. Russia is winning on almost every aspect, their real big loss was the inability to overthrow the government and install their puppet regime (like Belarus), and for that we should prop to Zelensky who proved to have balls of steel, regardless of what we think of him

@spartacusthebringerofrain3007

2 ай бұрын

Because they have been lying to you the entire time. Ukraine has been lying to get western countries to waste more money on the war while the leaders in Ukraine stuff their pockets with it and get rich. The government has been lying to you because the money they are printing is going to thier donors in the military industrial complex making them rich producing more weopens for a losing war. The media is lying to you to manufacture your consent for running up debt and if things go really wrong to send you to die fighting over a useless country in Eastern Europe. Ukraine and its borders mean nothing to anyone in the west and noone should stand with Ukraine. This is all about making the rich richer at your expense and possible death from politicians who don't fight wars. The Russian version of the senate voted to start the invasion Putin did not just start it. Only American presidents can illegally attack countries without consent of congress or the public Russia cannot

5 b21s 25 b1s 50 buffs 20 F22s 16 more patriot systems 75 F35s 100 F15s 250 F16 260k support personnel 80k fighters and the armor/artillery to support them. Oh and 200billion give or take a trillion. Takers???

NATO needs to start supplying Ukraine with NATO designed shovels.

напоминаю, самое большое венгерское кладбище - под Воронежем

The Russian regime already claims that it's "fighting nato". How could they suddenly claim that a nato country is "escalating"? :D :D

@TankoxD

2 ай бұрын

We don't. you can send your LGBTQ armies and we will call you with wrong pronouns and win.

@jetster785

2 ай бұрын

Basically Russia have just contradicted it's own propaganda against the reality! 😏

@MrEvrit

2 ай бұрын

If I teach you how to make a pizza am I cooking the pizza?

@dragonemperorsy2515

2 ай бұрын

Ever heard of proxy wars? The US is also fighting Iran through it's militias. Same for US and Ukraine

@MrEvrit

2 ай бұрын

@@dragonemperorsy2515 I do agree that proxy wars exist. They pretty much always existed. The thing I don't understand is why when the US does it is bad but when Iran or Russia do it it's ok.

The main thing is just move NATO forces into Ukraine with the simple mission "defend yourself from attack".

@J--12

Ай бұрын

Genious plan, i'm sure nothing will go wrong.

"If ukrainew as in NATO, Russia would never have attacked" and "After ukraine, Russia will surely attack NATO" quickly shows that one side is fear mongering and eager for war at every step, and the other has been offering diplomatic solutions for the past decades.

@normieloser6969

2 ай бұрын

Russia has only dared to mess with countries outside of NATO, and was pissed that that could end when Georgia and Ukraine wanted to stop getting messed with. Now they are all in and perhaps delusional. If they do attack a NATO country it will not be a long war, neither will the existence of the elite that started it.

@2hotflavored666

2 ай бұрын

Exactly, russian imperialists always eager to start was in Eastern Europe and now Ukraine. When will russia stop?

@brokencat2662

2 ай бұрын

@@2hotflavored666 How can something the size of a truck fly over your head so easily is beyond me, a clear victimhood mentality of "THIS IS TO BLAME, THAT IS AT FAULT, EVERYONE IS EVIL EXCEPT ME, HELP ME" Just open your eyes. You seem like the type to say "Lmao Ruzzia can't take down ukraine in 2 days, such a weak army, pathetic" and then turn around and scream "RUSSIAN ARMY IS SUCH A THREAT , WE NEED EVERYONE IN NATO, WE NEED TO SEND ARMY TO EVERYWHERE, PANIC PLEASE"

@ClubofInfo-Circulation

2 ай бұрын

also almost all sentiment against Russia is based on rambling about the alleged past crimes of the Soviet Union or going back several hundred years. None of it is based on the status of Crimea or the actions of Putin. This makes NATO clearly the aggressor because its whining grievances are based on psychological instability and frustration about past historic events

@YaGoodryl

2 ай бұрын

Russia will attack, it doesn’t have to be directly, can easily repeat Crimean scenario with units using no sign on the first stage. Then propaganda will do the rest, to assure the sleepy west that it’s not quite certain what’s going on, maybe we should do nothing. By the time people realize they will come to bargain to bite it off piece by piece, like they did in Ukraine. Surely, they won’t need let’s say Italy, but a controlled puppet (purchased to be friendly) government why not.

So if we include nato pilots with Ukrainian pilots, we're basically gonna do what russia did in the korean war. They sent their pilots over to help fight the US. What comes around goes around, I guess lmao.

@PhysicsGamer

3 ай бұрын

"Lightning Alley" really does have a good ring to it, doesn't it?

An initial option is the have NATO nations offer guaranteed contracts to munitions manufacturers. A big thing keeping the manufacturers of tanks, bombs, and missiles from expanding production is the concern that the war will end before they can recoup the investment needed to expand production. If the NATO countries guarantee that they will purchase the munitions, even if the war ends, then industry will be more willing to expand production.

@nicholaswalsh4462

2 ай бұрын

@@jameschalkwig787 that was a lot of words to say nothing.

That would be a Nuke war.

The amount of Russian bots in these comments is insane tbh

@astravinsible6422

2 ай бұрын

The amount of Ukrainian bots in these comments is insane tbh

@su8m4n

2 ай бұрын

You have no idea how many of them there are in the Russian segment. In words, 87% support, in fact, all the appearance of support for the chief is bots and zombies. The mobilization included mainly the rural part of the population, who were washed by propaganda long before everything and who are ready to kill everyone and everyone in their path for the sake of money and the chief. NATO, like the "Allies" at the time, is waiting for the appetites of modern fascism.

@ArchangeZ

2 ай бұрын

Yeah it's insane aint it? Such backwater country, yet uses more advanced bots online with more arguments than any liberal NPC from the west. Go cope harder.

What's the minimum amount of political upheaval needed to liberate my tax dollars?

@e33d90

2 ай бұрын

based

Thank you for this update.

God the vatnik bots on these videos are crazy 😂

@jacktaylor0465

2 ай бұрын

Didnt ukro shills say Ukraine was gonna win? What happened to that?

@evFPV

2 ай бұрын

@@jacktaylor0465LOL, what about "take Kiev in 3 days"?

@jacktaylor0465

2 ай бұрын

@@evFPV 2022 >Ukraine is gonna win >Russia is gonna Collapse >2024 >Ukraine doesnt win >Russia still in Ukraine >uh uh muh 3 days!!11!! What about Russia running out of supplies back in April 2022? Or the Summer Counter Offensive of 2023? Or Leopards and Himars turning the tide of the war? Pepperridge farm remembers,lmao

@jacktaylor0465

2 ай бұрын

@@evFPV What happened the Summer Counter Offensive of 2023? What happened to Russia running out of supplies in 2022? What happened to Russia collapsing?

@Joehk416

2 ай бұрын

@@jacktaylor0465why are you mad? Why are you desperately trying to support this imperialistic dictatorship thats threatning European Democracy. Either you are 13, or you have a very sad life

I like the general concept of Ground News... but it listing CNN as a highly factual source tells me all i need to know.

I think NATO should take over logistics and supplies via mercenaries in Ukraine. This security could also mean mercenaries would want to fight on the front line. The logistics support could also mean support for field hospitals and aviation assets. The latter could involve mercenaries flying reapers at the front line as well, supporting attacks along the front line. This would be limited NATO involvement but hopefully be enough for larger groups of mercenaries to want to go there and fight. Some of the US groups are over 200k members. That could make a difference.

The amount of bots in the comments may be an indication of Russia being scared. Having to fight fair is the last thing on their mind.

@user-ip3xn1pl1k

2 ай бұрын

Maybe lovers of the West are afraid, calling everyone bots whose opinion differs from theirs?

@fredbyoutubing

2 ай бұрын

@@silaslong-js8ps I would be if an authoritarian nation armed with nuclear weapons invaded my home. It's not a fair fight, that's my point.

@dragonemperorsy2515

2 ай бұрын

​@@fredbyoutubing what is a fair fight? War is never fair. It isn't a UFC match where one can only fight thier weight class

@user-it3ve2bl7j

2 ай бұрын

I see only orc bots here. And yes, writing this kind of comments, as well as creating THOUSANDS of fake/propaganda videos (and absolutely stupid ones) is a reliable sign of horror (and stupidity, of course). A fair fight is something the West has NEVER DONE. By the way, the orcs are so funny when they think that Russia can be defeated with bullshit on the Internet..)))

@fredbyoutubing

2 ай бұрын

@@dragonemperorsy2515 So, in other words, you agree 🤷

If NATO escalates, there is a fair chance China esculates. China will do this because they know if Russia is strategically defeated the USA will focus on them next. The idea of limitations of escalation is foolish in the extreme. Binkov's analysis is missing factors such as NATO troops are not well trained for this conflict, poor ammunition availability and logistical limitations.

@OverG88

2 ай бұрын

This. The war will escalate all over the world if big Western powers shift their war machinery solely to Ukraine. Bye bye France from Africa, bye bye US from the Middle East, and most definitely, bye bye US from South and East China sea. If NATO enters Ukraine, China will never ever get a better chance to deal with Taiwan, once for all.

@saldownik

2 ай бұрын

It's not that easy for China to escalate even if NATO will involve itself in Ukraine more intensely. Naval and air NATO's assets will still be free to interdict stuff on the sea.

@peetasmith4403

2 ай бұрын

@@saldownik there are many ways China can escalate. Yes there are huge drawbacks and devastating economic consequences for both NATO and China. The magnitude of the consequences of escalation are huge and not properly addressed in Binkov's analysis.

@saldownik

2 ай бұрын

@@peetasmith4403 what would be your first thought when it comes to what China's escalation could answer greater NATO's involvement in Ukraine?

@peetasmith4403

2 ай бұрын

@@saldownik firstly direct and vertical escalation, there are rumours of direct military aid, such as 122mm shells, vehicles direct logistics support but mostly economic and supply, drone batteries and motors, chips and electronics and manipulation of other supplies, both in favour of Russia and against NATO. Other escalation such as trade relationships and fiscal policies such as adoptions of trade in non dollar denominations. Then lateral escalation of proxy conflicts such as what Russia has done in Africa and a possibility of Israel's current conflict. Lots of options that will enflame American interests and drive a response. Escalation theory is a huge area of political science and foreign relations and one well understood. Often such escalation is to provoke a response and use the enemies own response to hurt them. We can easily conclude this has already happened to a large extent and could be escalated to a significant degree, calculated to destroy NATO economies and cause internal political instability.

WW3 FOR UKRAINE???? LMAO MY ASS. STOP PLAYING WITH FIRE.

LOL Russian in comments still going "Ruskie army strong" and think they can take on NATO while they can't even deal with Ukraine.

@pavels8890

2 ай бұрын

its funny to see how Ukrainian meat is literally fighting with US+Nato toys and 100 B budget and still barely holds the line and loses actually to current "sanctioned" Russia

@arhidemus

2 ай бұрын

А какой смысл снимать ролики, про то, что вы сильны? Придите и возьмите.

@yegor6763

Ай бұрын

Read about the Wolfowitz doctrine. It can quite possible change you're perspective on the current events happening in my country of birth (Ukraine) It is quite easy to see who is actually benefitting from all of these proxi conflicts once you start searching around for some censored names, families and organizations. Sadly though KZread doesn't allow these certain names and links to be posted on here as they are a direct *threat* to freedom of speech and democracy these days (SARCASM)😄

@cameronspence4977

Ай бұрын

​@@pavels8890I can tell how bad youre coping and crying into your keyboard as you type this by the disorganized structure of your sentences😂 On the contrary, your boys are struggling to take 20% of your own decrepit third world ex colony armed with our 1980s warehouse surplus😂

@krunchie101

Ай бұрын

They are going to OD on copium still thinking they can take on NATO when Ukraine alone is taking 2+ years now. 😂

Quite the extensive overview (as always) of hard to predict potentialities. Thank you very much!

Thank you for being one of the few channels that doesn't talk about the political aspect of the war, and just focusing on the military stuff.

@suzyk8947

2 ай бұрын

Imaginary military stuff

Ukraine seems lacking industrial equipment necessary to build secondary line defenses.

Что за чушь я посмотрел?

@wizeghunter6490

2 ай бұрын

влажные мечты....ну или прогрев общественного мнения

@heyhoe168

2 ай бұрын

@@wizeghunter6490 Не, это на самом деле честный анализ. Блинков точно не состоит в штате пропагандистов. Все названые в видео цифры легко бьются с открытыми источниками. Предлагаемый размер группировки вмешательства тупо повторяет размер российской группировки.

@aresnir2725

2 ай бұрын

@@heyhoe168 Открытое вмешательство НАТО приведет к третьей мировой войне.

@PanEban

2 ай бұрын

Копиум

@elcarnero4763

2 ай бұрын

@fadaos Вы правы, это бред, но он основан на гипотетическом видео.

A lot of Ruzzians have got their day pass on here…

@user-ok2mn4bw7u

3 ай бұрын

I'm a Ukr@inian woman from Mariupol. French President Macron said that Russia needs to be defeated. I have a question. Does anyone know of at least one case when the Western Orcs came to our Russian lands and were able to defeat us? Give at least one such example.

@hresvelgr7193

3 ай бұрын

@@user-ok2mn4bw7u Germany WWI

@eric5401

3 ай бұрын

@@user-ok2mn4bw7uyou Russians defeat yourselves every 100 years, lmao. Why bother at all when you’ll all be at each others throats Despicable culture and people

@voonijf

3 ай бұрын

no youre not lol@@user-ok2mn4bw7u

@dio2734

2 ай бұрын

@@user-ok2mn4bw7u WW1. Russia lost the war due to internal problems and as a result huge chunks of land were freed. Poland, the Baltic States, Ukraine, Finland and Belarus were all freed from the Russian empire. Even in WW2 when Hitler invaded, Russia survived thanks to the help from the US and even with US help it was a very close fight.

America sent 2 patriot system's, and more then a dozen modified hawk system's

@jensramputh

2 ай бұрын

That's not correct. NATO has 8 patriot systems in Ukraine. 6 covertly brought in

@spritezeroxxx66

2 ай бұрын

@@jensramputh Did Lavrov tell you that?

Persoanlly i dont think any country has the ability to fight wwii style, least not anytime soon. If you look at numbers of aircraft, ships, and tanks back then compared to todays, while much stronger, they are two few in number. Plus the population has changed. No countries population would support a full scale war for long. Excluding dictatorial ones like n.korea where they dont have a choice. The current world stage could be compaired to trench warfare or hitlers moves before the invasion of poland. Having said that, these are truly terrifying times we live in. Where idiodic would leaders could send us all to our deaths, over what, oil? Land? A legacy? Stupidity in its finest. I think we can all agree, no matter where we are from. We all really just want a way to provide a good life for us, our families and children and to live in peace. Sad that our leaders, in all corners of the globe, seem to incompetent to do that.

@christophercoupe5006

2 ай бұрын

Putin started the war in Ukraine so how are all world leaders incompetent?

The one aspect missing here is the realistic Russian response. NATO has been holding back overwhelming force as a threat to control Russian options. If NATO plays those cards, they no longer restrain that Russian option. For example, if Russia uses tactical nukes, the USA has suggested they would wipe out every Russian position and vehicle inside Ukraine. The end result would still be Russian loss, but definitely an analysis worth doing.

@TransoceanicOutreach

2 ай бұрын

UK military Intelligence has estimated it would take 4-6 days (depending on the weather) for NATO to destroy 90% of the armoured vehicles in Ukraine using airpower alone. This would involve 750 bombing sorties per day. Russia knows this, which is why they keep babbling about nukes. And Russia has been told (back in 2022) that if they use even a small nuke in Ukraine then NATO will do the above. Putin is in an impossible position, his only hope is a conventional victory, which simply won't happen.

Every "Hypotetical" would end in Nukes. Case Closed

@johnriddington9514

2 ай бұрын

Completely wrong, just like every threat of Nukes has been a pathetic whine by Putler so far. Case Closed...

@serheyyavotsky1246

2 ай бұрын

@@johnriddington9514 exactly because you think this way it will end with nukes

@johnriddington9514

2 ай бұрын

@@Liberistan_Peoples_Republic sorry Putler is only paying you $3 a day to make these comments sad Troll...

What might it look like? It might look like mushroom clouds all over the world.

Its getting hard to find legitimate comments on some of these videos, seeing alot of state sponsored political trolls. Great video as always, intresting seeing different scenarios to Armageddon

8.30 ‘a few hundred F16s wouldn’t be enough?’ You’re talking 100s of F16s and F35 is nuts!

Here come the little rusky computer warriors, boys.

Didn't see your survey. Thanks for the video.

Video is already out of date considering the amount of Ukrainian air intercepts of A50, Su34, and Su35 the past few days.

@zayedbinimran957

3 ай бұрын

Yeah with no confirmation

@palar4195

2 ай бұрын

@@zayedbinimran957 does you questioning oinkraine reports? r u a putin's orc-bot?

@RenanMendes-zd8hj

2 ай бұрын

They have literally not provided any footage of what they claim LOL and we know very well the Ukrainians publish every single thing they do on the internet, I prefer to not believe in the words of compulsive liars LOL

@MaddoScientisto-fb3kb

2 ай бұрын

@@zayedbinimran957 except for footage and reputable Russian Telegram channels like Fighter Bomber confirming it, yeah, no evidence whatsoever

@hemidactylusfrenatus173

2 ай бұрын

​@@palar4195 ??????

The problem with NATO is they don’t even have enough soldiers for all their weapons

@TankoxD

2 ай бұрын

That's not right. They can simply name Russians with the wrong pronouns and win easily.

@palar4195

2 ай бұрын

aren't european weapon stockpiles are depleted and none of nato solders has been lost?

@fischersfritz468

2 ай бұрын

​@@palar4195no. There is just no surplus of old stock around anymore

@jakekn7304

2 ай бұрын

​@@palar4195there are not depleted, they just have many customers for their weapons

@palar4195

2 ай бұрын

@@fischersfritz468 are you just saying nato is neglecting its promises to help oinkraine by sending only surpluse of old stock?

Just came back to watch again and check I liked it the first time.

on christmas we are at home

@alexmaclean1

3 ай бұрын

Historically such claims about American war involvement being short term have not held up well lol

@richy2837

2 ай бұрын

@@alexmaclean1 in any war (WWI+II; ukraine etc)

Keep dreaming dude, it’s free!

3 million 152mm sheels are provided by North Korea , how can anyone fight with that amount of shells , they can fire 30k shells for 100 days continously

@ZontarDow

3 ай бұрын

The fact two thirds are duds is a good help though

@alexgon6011

3 ай бұрын

that's the scale of the war, problem is people are living in their toyish echo chamber thinking this war is about a bunch of tanks destroyed and a couple of drone videos shot every now and then

@Truspio

3 ай бұрын

You need to have precision ammunition and destroy guns

@michaelharper8407

3 ай бұрын

Made from north Korean slave Labor

@apollyon1

3 ай бұрын

How many barrels did they provide?

NATO air power is insane.

@Ravi9A

2 ай бұрын

insane alright, insanely stupid.

@williamdavis9562

2 ай бұрын

COnsidering the lack of Ammo it isn't that insane. Aside from Turkey and America. There is nothing insane about Nato's airpower. Yes England and France have high end planes. But they don't have the logistics to keep them flying, no enough pilots and barely any ammunition.

@eugenpuscasu2123

2 ай бұрын

🤡@@williamdavis9562

@MrLougarou1000

2 ай бұрын

@@williamdavis9562 almost as serious as Russian air defense.

@williamdavis9562

2 ай бұрын

@@MrLougarou1000 Still doesn't change the fact that outside of Turkey and the USA the rest of the Nato nations are so inept they won't even be able to test those bad Russian air defenses will they? I don't even know why we say Nato vs XYZ. We should just say America vs XYZ.

You can grow orange, lemon, banana etc in Ukraine, if the weather conditions become warmer than ever before. Generally, there won’t be winter.

@iGhostr

3 ай бұрын

Szia Józsi! Nagyon tetszik a profilképed, nosztalgikus lett a hangulatom tőle! A legjobbakat!

The problem seems to be that NATO has been overly clear re what it considers the red line to be. Perhaps if dictators were less certain of when NATO may choose to push back, they would be less likely to engage in military adventures.

The main question is who paying the WAR?

@joycekoch5746

2 ай бұрын

I hope that I am. If I discover that my taxes are simply going to a immigrant welcome center I will be upset.

@yegor6763

Ай бұрын

Certainly not Red shield and he's ghouls as after all they are the sole benefiters of these types of wars😂

@marijanstankovic8036

Ай бұрын

Well, you, my dear chap! US and EU tax payers. And all that money goes to US-EU military industrial complex.

Jajajajaja. Buena película 😂. Solo falta Maveric y Rambo. Jajajajaja es la única forma. Manden los F14 contra los Su 57 😂😂😂😂😂

@mattrehu8154

2 ай бұрын

What the fuck is a maverick and a Rambo? Your dream lover boys? What the fuck? You must be a child of minor age, go back to bed with ya warm hot chocolate.

It is interesting that western powers did support Ukraine with lots of money, but only very small numbers of equipment. Everything larger than an ATGM usually was limited to (very) old equipment and to even smaller numbers. I wonder why they didn't even activate their own arms industry production capablilities? All manufacturers are still in standby or in peace time mode. They didn't even try to increase anything so far, except the ammunitions industry pretty recently (also a very late choice). Why is that?

@YwhMusic

3 ай бұрын

Incompetence

@dosunmupelumi7845

3 ай бұрын

​@@YwhMusic The west should have no business in Ukraine in the first place, besides if that happens China which the so called west also hates will provide 100% support to Russia, the entire west cannot outproduce 1billion Chinese people under any circumstance.

@granatmof

3 ай бұрын

So the fact is, the US should be start expanding production line capacity today. Even in WW2 it took a few years to fully expand US production capability. The US has seen a significant loss in manufacturing capacity as a result of business decisions from the 80s to increase short term profits to shareholders. However, it would still take 3-5 years to widen pduction capacity. A great example of this is the adoption of the new 6.8mm cartridge for the Army's new rifles. It's going to take the US Army a few years to add those new production lines at their ammo production facilities. Some production lines are so complex they can't really be widened any further. Like the F35. Something like 1000 us subcontractors across the country supply parts. Some of them are actually rather small companies that really can't double production. As for supplying Ukraine with older hardware, part of that was mutual spendthrift ness. If Ukraine spent it's company money in the US company weapons store, they could "buy" a lot more older equipment for cheap. It was still better than what they or Russia had, but it didn't hamper US capabilities. It's also worth pointing out, Ukraine isn't fully trusted with US secret technologies. They're not "in the fold". Part of it Ukraine still has a corruption issue. That hasn't been resolved, and it's even caused trouble for Zelensky in the last year. The US is not going to give Ukrainians unfettered access to and F35 or even the latest Gen radar on the newest F16s. It's not going to happen. Russia and China would have access to the data within a month. The reality is, and this sucks to say, it's not in US interest for the war to be fast. The war weakens Russia a lot. The issue is Russia is starting to form a wartime economy, and I'd be curious how much China has widened production. The US is lagging behind, pososbily in naive hope war will not break out like PREWW2 Britain. Let's just hope the US has its Mosquito figure out properly before the war.

@fanch22480

3 ай бұрын

​@@dosunmupelumi7845lol china will not suport russia against NATO on this matter , since it would broke the globalization who is the only way to survive for china , they would even take siberia from russia after they loose for sure 😂 they are not russia friends at all , they just share some interest and when those interest will change china will dump russia like an old hookers😅

@dzonikg

3 ай бұрын

@@granatmof You cant expand production with out recourses ,In WWII in USA no single civilian car was produced ,no single civilian building,all recources went to war production. Are you ready for that just for sake off some land where 99% off Russian live and was actually Russia before communist give it to Ukraine in 1954

It would be like vroom vroom pew pew pew kaboom boom pow

The truth!. Europeans must understand that their line of defense starts in Ukraine, if Ukraine loses maybe a weak non-NATO country will suffer the consequences.

@barbosaguzman6101

2 ай бұрын

lol shhhhh

@s1ash19

2 ай бұрын

@@barbosaguzman6101go back to ural russian trol

This comment section is the real world war

@avengerpz

2 ай бұрын

Naaa, just troling ;)

@tristanridley1601

2 ай бұрын

The world war IS trolling.

russia may be short on equipment for its soldiers but not on trolls and bots thats for sure

Just remember that the 3rd Karabah War ended in a draw as Binkov's prediction.🤤

People forget that Sadam had like 6 thousands tanks when we invade. The war was almost done in a 8 hour day. Once the f15 f16 f35 f22 where in the sky. Sadam could have one hundred thousand tanks it would make no difference. Russia is a artillery army. The US is about guided missiles. Russia will never be able to use artillery because it would be targeted as soon a shell is sent and the sam 300 or 400 would be destroyed.

@RIEKSONE

3 ай бұрын

Russia has a far superior air defense network than Iraq and the US doesn't have the surge capacity to keep up with Russia . A fully mobilized Russian military is 20 million soldiers .

@Koz4concern

3 ай бұрын

Ye not like Russia has any nukes or anything

@dnocturn84

3 ай бұрын

And you forget that Sadams little air defence grid is nothing compared with Russias. Back in Soviet days they countered American reliance on sky dominance by heavily invest in air defence systems (not to mention their own fleet of strike craft). These anti-air assets can easily also kill any incoming missile - with some error maring, of course. Ukraine proves that - only some 30% of fired missiles (that we know of) ever made it through - real numbers will have to wait a little while. Today Russian S300 and S400 systems are far more capable than Patriot systems in terms of range. Precission is a bit harder to realistically judge, but Russians have been equally successful in intercepting western missiles, as Patriot systems have been. No fleet of F15, F16, F35 or F22 can just fly in and dominate these skys, without taking heavy losses. The Ukrainian war also shows, that the amount of stored guided missiles by the US today, is way too small to actually destroy all Russian assets on the ground. Even if they'll get never successfully intercepted and always hit spot on.

@raymondandsweetheart7150

3 ай бұрын

@@RIEKSONE clearly you skip history class. So il remind you if America ever goes into war mode we will pump a ungodly amount of anything we need. So 20 million is nothing really.

@raymondandsweetheart7150

3 ай бұрын

@@Koz4concern Nukes like America doesn't have any or it can't produce anymore.

We don't need another Afghanistan style retreat.

@cideltacommand7169

Ай бұрын

If you can't deal with sand people how are u gonna deal with a now semi professional millitary ?

It would simply take a capacity to withstand radioactivity all around you.

NATO should send Troops and F-35s, even if pretending they are part of Ukraine's Foreign Legions.

@fpsserbia6570

2 ай бұрын

you can't pretend when for example us colonel is killed or number of US pilots that can not be hidden, couple of soldiers here and there yea but when it comes to high ranking members and pilots i don't think so, and involving F35s in war would immediately put in danger future effectiveness of F35 because Russia will learn how to find them and destroy them it isn't that easy, you can say just go in undercover but in reality Russia would immediately have every reason to legally attack NATO countries even nuclear response would be in consideration, because if NATO attacks then they would make Putin right and everything that Putin was saying from 2007 was actually truth

@death2641

2 ай бұрын

​@@fpsserbia6570 Russian did that during the Korean war

@Jamie95326

2 ай бұрын

Just call them little blue men. 😂

@user-ip3xn1pl1k

2 ай бұрын

What are you talking about, NATO can’t find artillery shells :)

13:30 - “That would be seen as an escalation by Russia.” At the risk of “underestimating” Russia…..I not think that would amount to just so much childish foot-stamping.

Сотни 2 Кинжалов и 3-4 Цирконов и от потенцияла НАТА - пшик ,сверху полируем ониксами и искандерами.Пару Ярсов для полировки бугорков в Аглии и Франкии.А Амеры даже и не пикнут - речь пойдеть о глобальном уничтожении, а вони люди вумные -- жить хотят да и своя рубашка ближе к тушке ..... Так-то....

this kind of outro was awesome btw

So basically NATO would need to come in and do everything and win the war

Western Anime loving gamers won't last a second on the front. That's why they need Ukrainian men to fight this war.

@DemonSliime

2 ай бұрын

The people you speak of have fought pretty much every single war prior to the Ukrainian war. If NATO sent troops into Ukraine and Russia did not use nukes, NATO could wipe Russia off the face of the planet using just conventional forces.

@Disconnect350

2 ай бұрын

@@DemonSliime Lmao anime profile pic.

@hansgruber2509

2 ай бұрын

They are confused with their own gender and too busy painting their nails

@hansgruber2509

2 ай бұрын

@@DemonSliime You must be a product of the US education system, big mouth no brain, the US lost in Afghanistan, Vietnam, did not win in Korea, Failed in Iraq, Iran has more power there than the US. They lost in Syria and Libya. Sound like failure to me

@hansgruber2509

2 ай бұрын

@@Cradleling LOL no they also know how to use the correct pronouns and color coordinate their pink hair and combat boots.

It would look like Hiroshima x 10000 .

@parabalani

2 ай бұрын

No it wouldn't. It has no existential threat for Russia.

@globalpropertyinvestment

2 ай бұрын

It absolutely would, as once a full on war starts, it quickly spirals out of control. Lets not take that risk.@@parabalani

@user-pg2kj7ps7o

2 ай бұрын

@@parabalani Of course it would. It would no longer be the “proxy wars” since 1945, this would be the “full fat”. Russia would use Nukes right away. And the west, with its men dressed as woman, drug addicts and third world infested cities would collectively defecate.

Maybe we could get the Ukrainians to build loitering munitions that function similarly to that "Wild Weasel" attack on the NVA's air defense artillery in Vietnam.

Slava the western defeatism, hero-cocainam snuffa

Which possibility is more demoralizing? A.) The comments are the product of the average level of intelligence. B.) The comments are the product of the level of intelligence of our professional propagandists. XD T_T

Suggesting Russia immediately starts throwing nukes around if X or Y threshold is crossed will always be flawed. No matter what, if Russia throws a nuke, someone throws one back, so they almost certainly won't.

@PluvioZA

3 ай бұрын

Yeah but the comments section has been totally flooded by bots, take a look at the insane amount of accounts with 4 numbers at the end of the name just all parroting exactly the same messages. It's crazy.

@KaboomHS

3 ай бұрын

@@PluvioZA didn't even notice that all pro-russia comments have 4 numbers at the end, that's kinda funny

@Cyprianek

3 ай бұрын

@@KaboomHS You do know that the 4 number at the end of a name is just a feature of KZread right: KZread has been adding numbers to usernames that are already taken. This is to ensure that every user has a unique username.

@ArcticDucq

2 ай бұрын

It might means dooming Russia but you can expect anything from desperate dictator. You can't count out bad possiblities, things can escalate so fast that we might have way more human lives gone than Ukranian-Russo war ever would cause. US been very carefull with not escalating the war so i hope they will contunie to be carefull.

@yglnvbrs

2 ай бұрын

>someone throws one back No, someone starts talking, there are none of the nuclear states that see this issue as existential except russia.

The idea that all of Russia’s aircraft you just lifted are in good condition is laughable

@dengawr6000

2 ай бұрын

Bro, check the percentage of combat-ready aircraft in different NATO countries, you will be fucking amazed 😂😂😂

Special forces and mirage 200s.

No need for Nato to help Ukraine, Ukraine is close to victory. Russia has lost hundreds of thousands of men dead and even more injured and Ukraine has barely lost a couple tens of thousands. Right,thats the truth and not the other way around, sure.

@pyromcr

2 ай бұрын

lol sure bud. EU estimates put Ukraine well over 100 thousand dead.

@anonanon7235

2 ай бұрын

@@pyromcr He's being sarcastic dude. Everyone knows the AFU KIA is well over 550,000

How where the deliveries "ample"? Ammunitiois running out alongside other important supplies.

@cideltacommand7169

Ай бұрын

Because they cannot keep production up

nice, added bonus no pluschies, one of the old 10/10-format Binkov's