How will Fermilab’s new accelerator propel particles close to the speed of light?

Ғылым және технология

The PIP-II project at Fermilab includes the construction of a 215-meter-long particle accelerator that will accelerate particles to 84% of the speed of light. It is the first U.S. particle accelerator project with significant contributions from international partners. Research institutions in France, India, Italy, Poland, the UK and the United States are building major components of the new machine. Superconducting radio-frequency cavities will provide the electromagnetic waves that propel particles to 800 million electronvolts. The new particle accelerator will enable Fermilab to generate an unprecedented stream of neutrinos-subtle, subatomic particles that could hold the key to understanding the universe’s evolution. It will power the scientific program for the international, Fermilab-hosted Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) and Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF).
PIP-II particle accelerator project:
pip2.fnal.gov
DUNE at LBNF:
lbnf-dune.fnal.gov

Пікірлер: 218

  • @tarangsrivastava3638
    @tarangsrivastava36384 жыл бұрын

    I need Dr.Don Lincoln to explain Superconducting radio frequency cavities.

  • 4 жыл бұрын

    Yes, yes! I watch several of his vidoes every day and have learned so much. Now with the PIP-2 project there will be plenty of cutting edge learning and home work to look forward to. God speed your endeviors. Kevin

  • @nicholaspassmore927

    @nicholaspassmore927

    4 жыл бұрын

    He has explained Radio Frequency cavities (in his how do particle accelerators work video), but I don't think they were super conducting.

  • @s3cr3tpassword

    @s3cr3tpassword

    4 жыл бұрын

    They work the same as normal conducting. The difference is that the SRF has higher Q factor, meaning low heat loss as stated in the video. TL:DR SRF cavities work the same as normal RF but can get accelerate to higher speeds because superconducting.

  • @DSAK55

    @DSAK55

    4 жыл бұрын

    Tell people the radio frequency is 5G

  • @buddingscientist170

    @buddingscientist170

    4 жыл бұрын

    contribution of india is significant

  • @Les537
    @Les5374 жыл бұрын

    Rock on Fermilab. Your work gives us hope when everything seems to be a little bit insane.

  • @Eliphas_Leary
    @Eliphas_Leary4 жыл бұрын

    Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment.... D.U.N.E. The spicy neutrinos must flow.

  • @alexv3357

    @alexv3357

    4 жыл бұрын

    Electron, muon, tau, and melange neutrinos

  • @markosullivan6444
    @markosullivan64444 жыл бұрын

    I love Fermilab's videos. Always fascinating and informative.

  • @ika5666

    @ika5666

    4 жыл бұрын

    Still, PR videos can not replace educational videos.

  • @Chinookman
    @Chinookman4 жыл бұрын

    Back again! Love it...sharing now with all I can.

  • @zerothm1
    @zerothm14 жыл бұрын

    Awesome, looking forward to the next Discovery!

  • @chojiju4532
    @chojiju45324 жыл бұрын

    Hi Fermilab! Glad you're still with us!

  • @albertgerard4639
    @albertgerard46394 жыл бұрын

    super great animations, Great narration, good job to creators!

  • @robertdurrant2957
    @robertdurrant29574 жыл бұрын

    Can Don or someone explain different experiments for "pulsed" and "continuous" beams.

  • @discreet_boson

    @discreet_boson

    4 жыл бұрын

    Indeed

  • @malenotyalc

    @malenotyalc

    4 жыл бұрын

    I'm sorry, is English not your first language? Seems self-evident to me.

  • @Shenron557

    @Shenron557

    4 жыл бұрын

    Continuous beam looks like this: _____________________ Pulsed beam looks like this: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

  • @x_gosie

    @x_gosie

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@malenotyalc What do you mean? Are new in this channel?

  • @jeremywarren7424

    @jeremywarren7424

    4 жыл бұрын

    Fully automatic vs 3 round burst:)

  • @ArawnOfAnnwn
    @ArawnOfAnnwn4 жыл бұрын

    Nice to hear about India contributing to some truly fundamental research. :)

  • @mountainclimber48
    @mountainclimber484 жыл бұрын

    Amazing technology. The power of the human mind...

  • @karthik681
    @karthik6814 жыл бұрын

    Wow India included, Thank you US

  • @pierrelasorak3241

    @pierrelasorak3241

    4 жыл бұрын

    In fact India is one of the major contributor!

  • @RaviTeja-fh2ke
    @RaviTeja-fh2ke4 жыл бұрын

    keep up the good work Fermi Lab I hope that you soon find another new particle such as the Higgs Bozon

  • @YutakaTaniyamasFeels
    @YutakaTaniyamasFeels4 жыл бұрын

    Damn thats beautiful. I was curious about the benefits of geometry in wave propagation. Increase in neutrino emissions is wonderful.

  • @devendrahyalij5724
    @devendrahyalij57244 жыл бұрын

    A lot of love from Indian 🇮🇳❤️

  • @philipj.fredholm5147
    @philipj.fredholm51474 жыл бұрын

    Why is the right hydrogen atom at 1:59 positvely charged when it has one proton and one electron?

  • @radiuscubed7985

    @radiuscubed7985

    4 жыл бұрын

    I think it should say neutral for the hydrogen on the right.

  • @mindblown1277

    @mindblown1277

    4 жыл бұрын

    They're optimists, for them neutral *is* positive

  • @HonzaKuranda

    @HonzaKuranda

    4 жыл бұрын

    Please don't destroy the whole experiment by telling them! :)

  • @ren7a8ero

    @ren7a8ero

    4 жыл бұрын

    And this is how a black hole is accidentaly built!

  • @skyak4493

    @skyak4493

    4 жыл бұрын

    They are just using the negative ones so nobody corrects the other label.

  • @PavanKumar-bd7he
    @PavanKumar-bd7he4 жыл бұрын

    It's great to see all these advancements in physics, the next project that I am excited about, is the eu sanctioned supercollider for cern.

  • @SebWilkes

    @SebWilkes

    2 жыл бұрын

    as someone working on the FCC, let me tell you that I think an even bigger challenge than solving the physics problems we face is getting the funding secured ...

  • @pressaltf4forfreevbucks179
    @pressaltf4forfreevbucks1794 жыл бұрын

    Do you know the formula of sodium hypobromide? NaBrO

  • @danieln7777

    @danieln7777

    4 жыл бұрын

    Lol

  • @Chinookman

    @Chinookman

    4 жыл бұрын

    Dying over here.

  • @pressaltf4forfreevbucks179

    @pressaltf4forfreevbucks179

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@Chinookman rip

  • @MissMarinaCapri
    @MissMarinaCapri4 жыл бұрын

    WOW ! THANKS!

  • @UtraVioletDreams
    @UtraVioletDreams4 жыл бұрын

    COOL!

  • @kricketflyd111
    @kricketflyd1114 жыл бұрын

    This facility to me,,, is the example of sustainable higher education that I wish was called regular training. Everyone interested in learning needs to have the experience and awareness for mental development that these large gov. funded facilities provide. I like playing with the nitrogen.

  • @p_square
    @p_square3 жыл бұрын

    Proud that India is also contributing towards PIP-II

  • @Kevin_Kennelly
    @Kevin_Kennelly4 жыл бұрын

    Respect and gratitude to all the people working at Fermilab.

  • @skyak4493

    @skyak4493

    4 жыл бұрын

    Respect if they can put this international collection of junk into something that can push an atom to 0.84C. Gratitude if they stop screwing up my TV reception.

  • @Rickc-qt5fy
    @Rickc-qt5fy4 жыл бұрын

    How owesome is this even😉

  • @Pratyushdoesanything
    @Pratyushdoesanything4 жыл бұрын

    *EXTRAORDINARY*

  • @jsykes1942
    @jsykes19424 жыл бұрын

    I'm a little curious about results from particle collisions. Especially when similar head-on collisions do not always yield the same particles. I am inclined to think some of the differing results may be related to the exact moment of the collision, or more precisely, the exact moment of oscillations a particle is going through. By this, I mean that if a particle shows up only half the time from similar head-on collisions, then we may be seeing only the top half of the full sine wave. Like a bouncing ball, it bounces up and down, then rolls across a little, then bounces up again, then rolls across again. We would not be seeing the bottom half of the full sine wave. And from the particles that do show up, if twice as many of those particles have a lesser measured value than particles of the highest measured value, this would also indicate we are seeing particles from the two "legs" of the sine wave and one particle at the peak of the sine wave, but nothing from the bottom portion of the sine wave. Just curious.

  • @SimonSozzi7258
    @SimonSozzi72583 жыл бұрын

    3:00 The copper wires in the machine are literally bent into peaks and valleys along the way, or virtually with an electromagnetic frequency...or both?

  • @DaBlondDude
    @DaBlondDude4 жыл бұрын

    Could this be combined with research I've seen using ultra tiny compartments in etched glass for particle acceleration? The power savings could be incredible if so.

  • @jacekpiterow900
    @jacekpiterow9004 жыл бұрын

    What Poland has done in this project?

  • @pierrelasorak3241

    @pierrelasorak3241

    4 жыл бұрын

    Cryogenic instrumentation (I think)

  • @ayush.kumar.13907
    @ayush.kumar.139074 жыл бұрын

    has this video been released before?

  • @Chinookman

    @Chinookman

    4 жыл бұрын

    Yes, late last week with an error in a graphic. They pulled it to correct over the weekend. Fast I must credit them!

  • @EgonSorensen

    @EgonSorensen

    4 жыл бұрын

    My thoughts also - thanks David W. Was wondering if 'they' somehow made this information travel faster than the speed of light, since the Fermilab video list only shows this one in their feed.

  • @ricardoabh3242
    @ricardoabh32424 жыл бұрын

    What’s the current limit due to frequency?

  • @RMLNZ
    @RMLNZ2 жыл бұрын

    Another example of people being the best human beings can be !

  • @physicsboi1744
    @physicsboi17444 жыл бұрын

    Why was this video privated and now unprivated?

  • @aviks1755
    @aviks17554 жыл бұрын

    When is it expected to be operational. Looking forward to it

  • @pierrelasorak3241

    @pierrelasorak3241

    4 жыл бұрын

    Late 2020s!

  • @teashea1
    @teashea14 жыл бұрын

    outstanding

  • @Bassotronics
    @Bassotronics3 жыл бұрын

    Looking forward to those Neutroginos!

  • @Baamthe25th
    @Baamthe25th4 жыл бұрын

    That's inspiring

  • @aviralomar3760
    @aviralomar37604 жыл бұрын

    India is contributing a lot Proud to be an Indian

  • @SirDeanosity
    @SirDeanosity4 жыл бұрын

    Is this accelerator a pilot project for the International Linear Collider Collaboration?

  • @Saki630
    @Saki6304 жыл бұрын

    You hyped the accelerator so much I was hoping you would say that within 10 years you will be able to put an extra set of super conductor accelerators on the end and push past 90% the speed of light.

  • @pierrelasorak3241

    @pierrelasorak3241

    4 жыл бұрын

    For this part, even if the speed and energies are impressive, an important part is actually _how many_ rather than _at what energy_. Neutrino beams need a lot of protons.

  • @fps079
    @fps0794 жыл бұрын

    It's like a giant, elongated linear Klystron tube for hydrogen ions (plasma?) instead of electrons.

  • @fps079

    @fps079

    4 жыл бұрын

    @RDE Lutherie I worked a radar site once upon a time where the power amplifier was 4 X626 Klystrons in parallel for peak power of 5MW. Waveguide as big as heating ducts. Power from a dynamo on a diesel locomotive engine. Everything in the old days was done with big hammers.

  • @mindblown1277
    @mindblown12774 жыл бұрын

    Why all the effort? Just type: pip install pip2

  • @mindblown1277

    @mindblown1277

    4 жыл бұрын

    @MichaelKingsfordGray *Grow. And it's youtube not the DMV. You must be american of you thought my comment was offensive

  • @drdca8263

    @drdca8263

    4 жыл бұрын

    I enjoyed your joke about python

  • @physicslover1950
    @physicslover19504 жыл бұрын

    I am getting confused about photoelectric effect . Do only the inner shell electrons undergo photoelectric effect ? Photoelectric effect is an absorption phenomenon . What if a high energy photon collided with an outermost electron ? The condition here is that the outermost electron is not in the conduction energy band but in the valence band. Is this means that things like compton effect will not happen? Because Compton effect is only applicable to the electrons in the valence band.

  • @CarBENbased
    @CarBENbased4 жыл бұрын

    So will this particle accelerator be able to test something fundamentally different from CERN or is it simply what's necessary to power the neutrino experiment?

  • @pierrelasorak3241

    @pierrelasorak3241

    4 жыл бұрын

    Yes, CERN and the LHC also do particle physics experiments, but they cannot study neutrinos (or at least, they produce far too few of them and with waaaay too much energy to do what DUNE wants to do). The neutrino experiments really need a huge number of protons impinging on the target to create enough visible neutrinos to exhibit the effect we want to measure.

  • @TheD4VR0S
    @TheD4VR0S4 жыл бұрын

    How do you get Protium to have 2 electrons and wouldnt it chemically be helium ?

  • @GGGG_3333
    @GGGG_33333 жыл бұрын

    It's amazing what we can achieve when we collaborate together 🌹.

  • @Andrew-yt6pf
    @Andrew-yt6pf4 жыл бұрын

    Ahh, but can it go up to 11?

  • @ashlengovender4240
    @ashlengovender42404 жыл бұрын

    Is this the intro to a new Flash series ??

  • @spacejaga
    @spacejaga4 жыл бұрын

    Thumbnail for the video looked like two people walking along unused gym :D

  • @P3t3rG1
    @P3t3rG14 жыл бұрын

    U shake the field to speed it up?

  • @Zen_Power
    @Zen_Power4 жыл бұрын

    What’s the difference between the pip 2 and the LHC? Which One accelerates particles at the highest energy levels?

  • @drdca8263

    @drdca8263

    4 жыл бұрын

    I believe the LHC produces higher energies, but they do different things and have different goals.

  • @pressaltf4forfreevbucks179
    @pressaltf4forfreevbucks1794 жыл бұрын

    This looks hella complex

  • @BIGWUNuvDbunch
    @BIGWUNuvDbunch4 жыл бұрын

    W8 what physics goals are there at 1 GeV?

  • @Haplo-san
    @Haplo-san4 жыл бұрын

    Didn't I watched this or is it uploaded second time? Yeah, it was three days ago; what is changed?

  • @kitemg
    @kitemg4 жыл бұрын

    Where is the Accellerator from S.T.A.R. Labs? :D

  • @youarelegend3980
    @youarelegend39804 жыл бұрын

    Feeling proud to be an Indian

  • @rightright6582
    @rightright65824 жыл бұрын

    Could u make a video on the Nutrino lab fed by this Particule accelerator. I did not know Nutrino experiment could be done on earth due to the inherent unknown variables. Eg, reproducing the power of a star in our back yard, Earth, to produce Nutrinos, i thought it was reserved for out of space labs, if possible. Some of us do not believe in Nutrino burts related to space-time continuum. Yet we know Nutrinos do exist and probably are the cause-effect for keeping the Universe together.

  • @spaceman7925
    @spaceman79253 жыл бұрын

    Its U.S. citizenship required to get job in Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory ? Thank you .

  • @guff9567
    @guff9567 Жыл бұрын

    You left your radio playing.

  • @utetopia1620
    @utetopia16204 жыл бұрын

    One of the greatest technologically advanced institutions in the world, and you still have to measure in football field lengths. Oh well, at least you used metric as well.

  • @skyak4493

    @skyak4493

    4 жыл бұрын

    And it's not even the "football" that most of the world is thinking.

  • @RandyJames22
    @RandyJames224 жыл бұрын

    Perhaps someday these particles will achieve Ludicrous Speed, but they'll have to adjust for all that Plaid.

  • @adityajain1378
    @adityajain13784 жыл бұрын

    Don Umii Don Don

  • @sergiocollado2438
    @sergiocollado24384 жыл бұрын

    Why 84% speed of light is the limit was designed?? and what is the improvment of quantum computing analisis at this new experiment??

  • @artao5
    @artao54 жыл бұрын

    What would the mass of a hydrogen particle be at that velocity?

  • @totherarf

    @totherarf

    4 жыл бұрын

    You nicked my question! ....... That means it is not totally out there ;0)

  • @petercarlson811

    @petercarlson811

    4 жыл бұрын

    The mass is the same as if it isn't moving at all.

  • @totherarf

    @totherarf

    4 жыл бұрын

    And here is me believing that to accelerate Any mass to c would require infinite energy because the mass would also be infinite! Of course I was told this before Quantum Theory was as embedded as it now is, so maybe it would only be half infinity and then only if you observed it?

  • @totherarf

    @totherarf

    4 жыл бұрын

    Ahh! Good to know I wasn't totally wrong then! ;0)

  • @petercarlson811

    @petercarlson811

    4 жыл бұрын

    @ Pretty please, don't encourage the use of "relativistic mass".

  • @pressaltf4forfreevbucks179
    @pressaltf4forfreevbucks1794 жыл бұрын

    Is 84% of the speed of light approaching relativistic speeds

  • @ika5666

    @ika5666

    4 жыл бұрын

    Barely....

  • @videoinformer

    @videoinformer

    4 жыл бұрын

    Time and space are dilated relative to the *square* of that percentage of light speed (0.84^2 = 0.7056). That means you have to get a lot closer to the speed of light than if the effect were merely according a simple proportion of light speed. At 84% light speed, you're getting 70.56% of the 100% dilation that would "mathematically" occur at the physically unattainable speed of light. So, at 84% the speed of light, time is slowed to 29.44% of its rate in our reference frame. (1-0.7056=0.2944) So, if you were on a space ship traveling at that speed for ten years according to time on earth, less than 3 years would pass for you and your fellow space travelers.

  • @pressaltf4forfreevbucks179

    @pressaltf4forfreevbucks179

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@videoinformer nice m8

  • @ika5666

    @ika5666

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@videoinformer the delation factor is not the square of the speed v devided by the speed of light c (i.e. 0.84^2 here) that but the square root of (1-v^2/c^2)...

  • @loganwolv3393

    @loganwolv3393

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@videoinformer 30%...that seems quite significant right?

  • @chaoslord8918
    @chaoslord89183 жыл бұрын

    "... about the length of two football fields." I'm a nerd watching a physics video. I have no idea how long a football field is.

  • @MadMax-xc4lr

    @MadMax-xc4lr

    2 жыл бұрын

    I also do hate when they use football field, school bus, thumb, shark head, john cena butt in measurments. This is a adult science channel no need to dumb it down. And oh inch pound feet when everything from quantum mechanics to relativity is in meters.

  • @cytryna400
    @cytryna4004 жыл бұрын

    Could you tell me about what Poland is responsible for?

  • @pierrelasorak3241

    @pierrelasorak3241

    4 жыл бұрын

    Cryogenic instrumentation (I think)

  • @user-sn3zp4ru2w
    @user-sn3zp4ru2w2 жыл бұрын

    معجل تيفاترون ينسف بمعجنات تي ان تي

  • @hridaydas1446
    @hridaydas14464 жыл бұрын

    Iam from India 🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @FractalFreedom
    @FractalFreedom4 жыл бұрын

    What is your opinion of Chris Langans CTMU theory? it’s a theory that supposedly explains reality itself and it brings in the use of both Philosophy and Science.

  • @nightjarflying

    @nightjarflying

    4 жыл бұрын

    [1] It is CTMU theory NOT CMSU [2] Langan is a fraud & life failure - last time I heard about him he was working as a bouncer [door minder] at a bar [3] he & his fan boys keep trying unsuccessfully to edit his Wiki page to 'big up' his reputation & to create credentials for him - all of the claims about being a genius with high IQ originated with him & one of his followers - it's bullshit [4] Langan is a 9/11 Truther & a 'white genocide' conspiracy theorist - he claimed that 9/11 was instigated by George Bush as part of a program by the government to suppress his CTMU theory. If the government wanted to suppress CTMU they can go after Langan himself rather than killing thousands of people. [5] He is a racist & an anti-Semite. [6] His fancy jargon is stolen from many sources especially the Intelligent Design movement from where he got "irreducible complexity" & "specified complexity" [7] When asked to explain CTMU in greater detail he gets offended & argumentative [8] The maths he used to "prove God" is nonsense [9] his book on his theory will never come out, because it would expose how weak his reasoning is - he uses the same word salad as theologians to disguise the emptiness of his stolen, cobbled together ideas.

  • @arqbolognesi
    @arqbolognesi4 жыл бұрын

    so when can we spect a gostbusters grade Proton Pack?

  • @PopeLando
    @PopeLando4 жыл бұрын

    Uh, real football pitches don't have lines drawn across them like that...

  • @adamkendall997
    @adamkendall9974 жыл бұрын

    How exactly does the PIP-II accelerator work? It just does. ~ Joe Dirts dad.

  • @cincomorales
    @cincomorales4 жыл бұрын

    What is it for ? And what’s going to do ? Can somebody tell me

  • @billswint7992
    @billswint79924 жыл бұрын

    Interesting, but what is the point?

  • @501Mobius
    @501Mobius4 жыл бұрын

    At least the US is not dependent on China for Niobium.

  • @spyglass1005
    @spyglass10054 жыл бұрын

    Money well spent. Go Fermilab!

  • @CCequalPi
    @CCequalPi4 жыл бұрын

    Electric fields dont have units of volts tho, are u talking about energy and simply the work the field does?

  • @humanrightsadvocate
    @humanrightsadvocate4 жыл бұрын

    Imagine the U.S. funding scientific research instead of the Military.

  • @ika5666

    @ika5666

    4 жыл бұрын

    Then the Russians and Chinese will come, steal the results, and force the surviving scientists to work in GULAG conditions.

  • @ika5666

    @ika5666

    4 жыл бұрын

    @Null Pointer Sure it is published, but it will not stop the rogue antidemocratic states from forcefully trying to get access to US facilities, wealth, and scientists if there is no prevailing US military force to defend them. I know, I was there, behind the Iron Curtain.

  • @amandaklapp1171

    @amandaklapp1171

    4 жыл бұрын

    You mean besides the $70 million a year spent on basic science from the military budget.

  • @humanrightsadvocate

    @humanrightsadvocate

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@amandaklapp1171 You're an idiot...

  • @humanrightsadvocate

    @humanrightsadvocate

    4 жыл бұрын

    @George Harakas You're an idiot.

  • @johngrey5806
    @johngrey58064 жыл бұрын

    Finally, finally, finally someone explains in detail how it's done! And with great 3D animations to show it too. Why some people disliked this video is beyond me. I think they must be Trumpists or something.

  • @EnglishMike

    @EnglishMike

    4 жыл бұрын

    Some denizens of the KZread comments deny Einstein's research and all physics after it.

  • @johngrey5806

    @johngrey5806

    4 жыл бұрын

    Plebs.

  • @johngrey5806

    @johngrey5806

    4 жыл бұрын

    @MichaelKingsfordGray many scientists follow Trump?? I don't even know how to reply to that. And so I won't. There's no reasoning with some people.

  • @sg-oe9wb

    @sg-oe9wb

    Жыл бұрын

    @@johngrey5806 There's no reasoning with an ideologue John which begs the question why you thought bringing politics into a science presentation was a good idea.

  • @johngrey5806

    @johngrey5806

    Жыл бұрын

    @@sg-oe9wb it was probably bothering me at the time.

  • @emersonsouza9960
    @emersonsouza99604 жыл бұрын

    Once again, y use superconductors I instead II?

  • @liltonyabc

    @liltonyabc

    4 жыл бұрын

    wut

  • @ornessarhithfaeron3576
    @ornessarhithfaeron35763 жыл бұрын

    I wanna put my hand at the output tbh

  • @aMartianSpy
    @aMartianSpy4 жыл бұрын

    Beans power.

  • @ika5666
    @ika56664 жыл бұрын

    800MeV only? Seriously?

  • @sandrakippert9470
    @sandrakippert94704 жыл бұрын

    What the intention of all this? What outcome do you want or expect? Why?

  • @pierrelasorak3241

    @pierrelasorak3241

    4 жыл бұрын

    The idea which isn't developped in this video is to create a neutrino beam, which can be used to discover physis properties of the neutrinos. For example do neutrinos and antineutrinos travel in the same way. If they don't, this can help to explain why we see more matter than antimatter, which in turn can explain... why we are here.

  • @Swordart2022
    @Swordart20224 жыл бұрын

    84% speed of light 0_o

  • @JohnJohansen2
    @JohnJohansen24 жыл бұрын

    I probably miss the point. But, why is 84% the speed of light significant? LHC can reach 99.999999%. And it's predecessor, the Large Electron-Positron Collider, up to 99.999999999999%.

  • @pierrelasorak3241

    @pierrelasorak3241

    4 жыл бұрын

    That's just the first stage of acceleration, the protons are then accelerated further in the Booster and Main Injector. At the end they reach 99.9965%. Note that the LHC accelerate very few protons for each collision compared to the number of protons which is impinging the target at Fermilab.

  • @JohnJohansen2

    @JohnJohansen2

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@pierrelasorak3241 Funny none of that is mentioned in the video above.

  • @GiacomodellaSvezia
    @GiacomodellaSvezia4 жыл бұрын

    I know this a 'propaganda' video, but nonetheless, I'm impressed by the science involved to make these experiments possible.

  • @skyak4493
    @skyak44934 жыл бұрын

    Well this explains it! I have been wondering why my TV reception has been going to crap down here in Naperville, and now I find out you have been putting together the International Superconducting Gigavolt TV Jammer up in Geneva! It's not funny anymore! Cut it out. Don't make me come up there!

  • @Erik-rp1hi
    @Erik-rp1hi4 жыл бұрын

    Big project but the little guy next to HLC and biggest brother, ITER.

  • @Ashley-jp4nn
    @Ashley-jp4nn4 жыл бұрын

    Feels like something from the beginning of a marvel movie

  • @MatthewSuffidy
    @MatthewSuffidy4 жыл бұрын

    So basically they are doing some weird things to avoid making a giant ring on their site.

  • @EthelredHardrede-nz8yv

    @EthelredHardrede-nz8yv

    4 жыл бұрын

    They have a ring already.

  • @xthe_moonx
    @xthe_moonx3 жыл бұрын

    what can this accelerator do that the LHC cant? LHC gets particles to go 99.99999% the speed of light and this one only gets then to 84%. in what way is pip2 better?

  • @dougspindler4947
    @dougspindler49474 жыл бұрын

    I'm building one of these in my back yard. Please support me with a generous donation at Kickstarter.

  • @inakimendiberri2226
    @inakimendiberri22264 жыл бұрын

    Fantastic, but how do we make nukes out of this?

  • @pierrelasorak3241

    @pierrelasorak3241

    4 жыл бұрын

    We don't! :)

  • @arthurvaganyan9016
    @arthurvaganyan90164 жыл бұрын

    Good.in future u will have water system the best clean one.no problems w.any.Water is most Power full.Gods.

  • @simplesimon1375
    @simplesimon13753 жыл бұрын

    WHAT is it used for? Travel? Health? Weapons? Whats the final outcome of this used for

  • @ZeedijkMike
    @ZeedijkMike4 жыл бұрын

    Nice to see America can actually corporate with other countries when you see how egoistic they are when it comes to Covid medicine!

  • @stza16
    @stza164 жыл бұрын

    What happens if Skynet takes over the lab?

  • @wendywright5486
    @wendywright54863 жыл бұрын

    Hey you guys need to let the people at CERN know that you don't need a mask 😹

Келесі