How We Will Build The First Moon Base!

Ғылым және технология

How We Will Build The First Moon Base! Today we're reviewing the Artemis Project, spearheaded by NASA and the US government, with China and Russia announcing plans for a lunar outpost. In addition to NASA, China, and Russia, SpaceX has plans for their first moon base.. so let's review!
Last Video: Starlink Gets Major New Update!
• Starlink Gets Major Ne...
Subscribe: kzread.info/dron/JjA.html...
SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
NASA News and Updates:
• NASA News and Updates
Blue Origin News and Updates:
• Blue Origin News and U...
Virgin Galactic News and Updates:
• Virgin Galactic News a...
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX mission to colonize Mars. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, Blue Origin, Virgin Galactic, and NASA. If you’re interested in space exploration, you’ve come to the right channel. We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
For SpaceX related news, you can visit www.theteslaspace.com, where we have a website and newsletter dedicated to everything about Tesla, SpaceX, Elon Musk, and more.
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
Business Email: derek@ellify.com
#Spacex #Space #Moon
0:00 Introduction
1:24 The key players
3:55 Building the moon
5:37 Space resources
10:24 Lunar infrastructure

Пікірлер: 973

  • @TheSpaceRaceYT
    @TheSpaceRaceYT2 жыл бұрын

    Who do you think will build the first Moon Base, SpaceX and NASA or China and Russia? Let us know below!

  • @clayongunzelle9555

    @clayongunzelle9555

    2 жыл бұрын

    your channel scratches that itch to hear about space news perfectly....

  • @briananthony4044

    @briananthony4044

    2 жыл бұрын

    Probably China where money is no object, unless they get into a war over Taiwan. The technology they lack they can steal, have you noticed that every Western research project has multiple Chinese scientists involved. Then probably Space X who aren't afraid of taking risks. Then a tie between Nasa and Russia, Nasa projects take 10 times longer and cost 10 times more and they are risk adverse, Russia has the will but lacks the financial resources unless the sanctions are lifted.

  • @atomicity7452

    @atomicity7452

    2 жыл бұрын

    I guess Space X if allowed to do so

  • @jeetujaysonraju4906

    @jeetujaysonraju4906

    2 жыл бұрын

    The idea of building a solar panel ring around moon's equator has a small logical problem. If you look at the numbers its a no brainer. a) If you can cover the moon with solar panels. Why can't you put in on earth instead, if the purpose is to supply earth with energy. b) When you convert solar energy (photons) into electricity (electron) via solar panels. the efficiency is at best 25%. c) Then you convert the electricity (electrons) into laser (photon) at a conversion efficiency of between 50%-85%. So you are left with 12.5% or 21.25% of the original solar energy. d) then on earth you again convert the laser (photons) into electricity (electrons) at maybe 30% efficiency with the best photovoltaic cell humans could produce. So you are looking at 3.75% (practical figure) to 6.375% (best case scenario) of the original energy. So the sensible thing to do is just put the solar panels on earth and you get 25% of the solar energy as useful electricity. Think about solar panels in space as a resistance to the free flow of photons from the sun and not as a giant collector of solar panels. Putting solar panels in space only makes sense if our energy needs are greater than 30% of the energy the sun gives us and we have already tapped into all of it. Then to collect more energy you have no option but venture into space.

  • @craigh2205

    @craigh2205

    2 жыл бұрын

    a gsa (global space agency )would be good save alot of money by not keep repeating projects on a national level instead spend on new projects develop ing new space technology quicker

  • @wes9451
    @wes94512 жыл бұрын

    The moon is covered in H-3. Its kind of important for Fusion reactors.

  • @jedi4049

    @jedi4049

    2 жыл бұрын

    yup this is why they're going, one of the reasons

  • @MardrukZeiss

    @MardrukZeiss

    2 жыл бұрын

    The latest news from fusion development makes this likely.

  • @linyenchin6773

    @linyenchin6773

    2 жыл бұрын

    Ahh "H-3," staple point of Gundam lore, where compact Minovsky reactors use it to generate a form of fusion that has the side effect of dispersing Minovsky radiation. That radiation scatters radio wave based communication systems... forcing people to fight ... in Giant Humanoid Robots(mech) called "mobile suits." This Minovsky radiation might have played a catalytic role in the emergence of humans with enhanced situational awareness that is geared toward optimizing orientation(in space but also intrapersonal and interpersonal orientation, allowing for functional but totally virtual~false boost in I.Q). These people sense multiple layers of subtext and context that are generally outside the attention~awareness of those who aren't the top of their respective fields of study or skill. This makes them borderline superhumans that have adept adaptability and a greater than normal range of potential for mental development + corresponding kinesthetic capability~proficiency. A small percentage of these "Newtype" characters do develop their faculties into the realm of "ESPER" like ability to read the nature of people and things. This ability triggers harmonic resonance that amplifies the flow of cognition and communication between two or more characters that touch on the threshold of Newtype awakening. This is their entering a state of "transcending themsleves," similar to bypassing our hands to imprive the "data link rate" of our minds and the A.I in our phones, as Elon Musk puts it. Not every one of these enhanced Humans can reach "esper" levels of "intuition," perception and cognition but nearly all of them can reach Ace level proficiency in whatever they practice, all within a few short months after they are initially exposed. The Newtype wasn't meant to be undermined as a mere magical being to be scoffed at as it has been by many "fans" of Gundam but an avenue of hope. Hope that people can mature past the *binding GRAVITY of insecurity* so we might then see the inner light of possibility, the light that resides in every heart as we all hope to grasp an ever improved quality of life for every interrelated being that is part of that life(biosphere).

  • @lawanddalatieh

    @lawanddalatieh

    2 жыл бұрын

    Papa bless

  • @kend6693

    @kend6693

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@MardrukZeiss Don't worry fusion is still 20 years away. And in 20 years it will only be another 20 years away.

  • @BERRUEZA
    @BERRUEZA2 жыл бұрын

    Those aliens at the end 😂 I can't believe you only have 24k subscribers! Your content is top notch 👌🏼 Thank you for all of your efforts to give us such quality content!

  • @critterfestsanctuary2446

    @critterfestsanctuary2446

    Жыл бұрын

    I fully agree but could somebody please give those Aliens a sandwich? They look like they're starving. 😄

  • @vincewilson1

    @vincewilson1

    Жыл бұрын

    They have 119K subscribers today!

  • @juliedavis9945
    @juliedavis99452 жыл бұрын

    I really love the idea of a Luna Telescope, especially since it would be constructed on the dark side of the Moon. We would be able to see so much more of the universe without all the light polution and other environmental obstructions.

  • @johnmanderson2060

    @johnmanderson2060

    2 жыл бұрын

    The dark side is not dark when sun ☀️ shine on it, it is called the FAR side for this reason. The idea of a telescope 🔭 there is good goal, not having the earth in sight is perfect for radio astronomy and optics too.

  • @critterfestsanctuary2446

    @critterfestsanctuary2446

    Жыл бұрын

    There is no dark side. It's just the back side or as John has said... Far side.

  • @nathaniellestrain9609

    @nathaniellestrain9609

    11 ай бұрын

    Oh yeah magnetic particle acceleration and taking the particle accelerator and scenting antimatter eons are electrons through microwave bursts or a stream of energy off of a particle magnet magnet on the end of a pipe or a 12 inch speaker magnet and putting the nether pipe contain it and then another magneton that and directing the energy beam to another said magnetic substrate on the magnetic particle accelerator sending electrons wirelessly through the air just as in Nikola Tesla Nikola Tesla Tesla coils structures on the main productions and wireless energy sending devices

  • @nathaniellestrain9609

    @nathaniellestrain9609

    11 ай бұрын

    The electro ion drive in the ion energy thermal axial flux energy thermostatic induction flying up and the Galaxy or in a Boeing 747 and using an aeon Flux electrothreads generator and an electric microwave jet engine to go out into space with the electro-conductive 747 and the biocontainment already there on the 747 for high-altitude

  • @nathaniellestrain9609

    @nathaniellestrain9609

    11 ай бұрын

    Here's a crazy thought NASA's Galaxy remember the giant Galaxy aircraft that the giant one that we transport all the NASA equipment for and now you know if it fits little Huey helicopters and shit like that inside of it and giant NASA Galaxy play nevermind I'm just playing up on the thought about an electro axial flux magnetic engine and the Galaxy aircraft and the 747 flying into space NASA

  • @David-hi9rp
    @David-hi9rp2 жыл бұрын

    I am a 50 year old man who was a baby at the time of the moon landings and am Mega excited about returning to the moon I just cant wait to see it on the Tv I will be GLUED. I only wish i could live another 100 years to see a Moon and Mars base.

  • @antonnym214
    @antonnym2142 жыл бұрын

    at 9:33 you imply that Hydrogen is frozen in those cold traps at 60°K. Hydrogen melts at 14°K, and goes to gas at 21°K, so even in a cold trap, it would be a gas.

  • @virx15

    @virx15

    2 жыл бұрын

    frozen water he meant probably.

  • @WWeronko
    @WWeronko2 жыл бұрын

    Once a lunar base is established, besides in-situ resource utilization, the Moon can be used of source of construction materials. Space liners, orbiting hotels and other facilities can be constructed from lunar derived metals. It is clearly very expensive to haul from Earth to orbit construction materials. Things as simple as steel plate can be manufactured on the Moon, shot into orbit and used for the base materials of large ships and structures. Eventually metal (M-type) asteroids can be maneuvered into an Earth or lunar orbit for similar purposes.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    The same can be said for MARS, CERES, and other asteroids.

  • @fuzzywzhe

    @fuzzywzhe

    2 жыл бұрын

    All this stuff sounds neat, but what is the economic incentive to do it? I'm not talking about money, I'm talking about resources. Would you REALLY want to live on the moon, or on a space station? Imagine, never being able to go outside, no mountains, no hiking, you are in a structure, for years, maybe a lifetime. Unless there's a resource to be obtained, it's unlikely we're going to be establishing any colony somewhere any time soon.

  • @WWeronko

    @WWeronko

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@fuzzywzhe Many would. Wander lust is a key component in a large segment of humanity.

  • @Riteaidbob

    @Riteaidbob

    2 жыл бұрын

    You sound like a film right out of the 50's. Orbiting hotels? LMAO!!!

  • @fuzzywzhe

    @fuzzywzhe

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Riteaidbob Well, ironically, orbiting hotels have been proposed for the commercialization of space. Some realistic, some that couldn't be done in this century.

  • @BodeBoi-dt3hg
    @BodeBoi-dt3hg2 жыл бұрын

    Love your videos keep up the awesome space content

  • @robertlee8805

    @robertlee8805

    2 жыл бұрын

    I Agree. Keep it going. Up to the Moon we go! Then to Mars. Whats next?

  • @kushking949

    @kushking949

    Жыл бұрын

    Too bad he sounds like a 7 year old child

  • @SuLokify
    @SuLokify2 жыл бұрын

    With the advent of reusable launch vehicles, the game has changed in a big way. Falcon 9 is already about 20% the cost per ton to orbit of its closest competitor... And Starship will be even cheaper per launch than Falcon 9, with nearly 5x the payload. A whole order of magnitude cheaper! I hope other launch providers start competing too

  • @bofink5377
    @bofink53772 жыл бұрын

    A permanent Moon base would be a much more useful thing, than a Mars base, in todays view of the space situation.

  • @gordtulloch

    @gordtulloch

    2 жыл бұрын

    Why do you think that? There's no good reason to have a base on the moon. Remote telescopes and robotic He3 miners sure but a base is pointless

  • @bofink5377

    @bofink5377

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@gordtulloch Agre to Your comment about automation, but a scientific research station and maybe later transformed to a tourist place could be build. SpaceX could have some use for their coming StarShips.

  • @Riteaidbob

    @Riteaidbob

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@bofink5377 Tourists? "Hey honey let's go to the moon on your next 2 week vacation. I hear the tunnels are lovely this time of year".

  • @OohzyJohnDow

    @OohzyJohnDow

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Riteaidbob How about it being astronomically wonderful to be able to go to another planet/moon?? Be in zero G, rocket launch, space walk, moon landing, low gravity, look at the Earth from another object in Space etc etc etc. But no Steve... there is only "tunnels"

  • @OohzyJohnDow

    @OohzyJohnDow

    2 жыл бұрын

    A moon base would only make sense if its a stepping stone for further travels. Sure there could be a station for some research etc and tourism could be something too. But mostly at this point in time it would make sense to use the moon as a low gravity stepping stone. Fuel production and storage etc.

  • @krylvus665
    @krylvus6652 жыл бұрын

    I think it would be very important to build large structures to use as indoor hydroponic gardens for crops.

  • @poppz3395

    @poppz3395

    2 жыл бұрын

    Plants need carbondioxide

  • @krylvus665

    @krylvus665

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@poppz3395 I wouldn't imagine it would be too hard to supply the structure with any ingredients necessary to maintain plant life. I also just watched a video today where he mentioned that he wants to use glass domes for plant life.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@poppz3395 Good thing that is what people exhale.

  • @parrotsarejustuncookednugg993

    @parrotsarejustuncookednugg993

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@jessepollard7132 and people exhale carbon dioxide thanks to the food we eat, so it's an egg and the chicken kinda thing. If u want to have crops or any sort of life u need some sort of carbon source, and maybe u could get that from those cold traps on the moon, or from some other sort of geological structure there

  • @parrotsarejustuncookednugg993

    @parrotsarejustuncookednugg993

    2 жыл бұрын

    Building actual crops maybe too hard for now, so I think sending food and such would be the best option for a while. Altho maybe u could engineer crops to use up less resources that are rare on the moon, and then it could get easier to get crops. But for sure food production is a very important step to having a long term moon station

  • @digitalonslaught0
    @digitalonslaught02 жыл бұрын

    Man your killing it with the content its soo good.

  • @re1v3r
    @re1v3r Жыл бұрын

    I have been watching US Military moon base videos all evening, and yours was giving me data points unlike any other videos before. Excellent job and presentation!

  • @millerscuba1
    @millerscuba12 жыл бұрын

    Great video. I'm excited to see what happens with the moon bases and the Gateway space station.

  • @therealthreadkilla

    @therealthreadkilla

    2 жыл бұрын

    LOL.......gateway space station is a 110% grift and has no possible way of EVER being built in your lifetime. kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4qYj7J8n5m0krg.html DEBUNKING GATEWAY FOUNDATION Pt1 (1080p)

  • @paarth5509
    @paarth55092 жыл бұрын

    Really underrated Channel!! Love it!!

  • @ronschlorff7089

    @ronschlorff7089

    2 жыл бұрын

    The channel seems great, the host is underrated however!! ;D

  • @xdg938
    @xdg9382 жыл бұрын

    Cool Video I Wish we could just Stop fighting each Others and unite unser one flag

  • @kirra7406

    @kirra7406

    2 жыл бұрын

    Well that won’t happen until some of the alien races have decided that we’re worth making contact with. Then I’m sure most earth country leaders will think of them as an enemy that we all have in common. We would of course think of them as a threat, as we currently do with each other. 🤨

  • @anaskhoiri3653

    @anaskhoiri3653

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@kirra7406 if terrestrial find us, them gonna colonized first we don't know their occupation to can be large community like country, race unity or tribalisme or more worst small community like pirate, family or company

  • @kirra7406

    @kirra7406

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@anaskhoiri3653 I’ve only come across one type/race, can’t comment on the rest of them.

  • @ronschlorff7089

    @ronschlorff7089

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yes, Earth's despots have wanted that for centuries!! LOL :D

  • @shaymonat
    @shaymonat Жыл бұрын

    On minute 5:00 you claim that "SpaceX's plan is to tip the starship and cover it with regolith". You're actually talking about a project that I conceived and worked on with a group of talented friends. While I'll be overjoyed if SpaceX makes it their plan, currently its not. But if Channels like yours keep promoting our project maybe it would become a reality.

  • @zagagrad
    @zagagrad2 жыл бұрын

    Fantastic video, some really cool ideas on what to do with our beloved moon.

  • @bb1111116
    @bb1111116 Жыл бұрын

    Many good ideas in the video. As for a far future human DNA bank underground on the Moon, why not build a far future city underground on the Moon? Underground protects from radiation. Power the city with the solar panels mentioned in the video. Structures can be built underground to grow crops and for living habitats. Sleeping quarters could be put in underground centrifuges to create artificial gravity and so on. Lots of potential on the Moon.

  • @Earthmoonstars-el6rd
    @Earthmoonstars-el6rd2 жыл бұрын

    It may take a number of years figuring out but a space elivator could help in the construction on are nearest celestial satellite. Also, Digging underground could provide us with endless room for expansion with 3-D printing in mind. For right now, like said, the starship is are best option with out spending billions more for the first base on the moon. China and Russia can do what ever they want in space but it would be better if we earthlings were all work together for all mankind.

  • @TidusCloudRulez

    @TidusCloudRulez

    2 жыл бұрын

    So True & less Carbon foot print 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 while Starship is the best rocket(s) able to carry the most people & cargo it still requires more fuel than a electric elevator system would.

  • @lewiswereb8994

    @lewiswereb8994

    2 жыл бұрын

    What's the difference between "are" and "our"? Didn't think you knew.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    Mostely depends on where an elevator has to be. L1/L2 isn't a bad. but L3/L4 are horrible (way way too large a stable volume).

  • @Riteaidbob

    @Riteaidbob

    2 жыл бұрын

    Living under ground. WOOHOO! Sound wonderful. (s/)

  • @kevincrosby1760

    @kevincrosby1760

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@TidusCloudRulez Carbon footprint? Take a minute to think about this silly and misleading term. The media has convinced many that releasing Carbon into the atmosphere will lead to an abnormal condition of increased carbon and higher global temperatures. The reality is that CURRENT conditions are abnormal, and our attempts to combat "global warming" are actually an attempt to delay the inevitable transition of our planet to its normal condition. The fossil record shows that for most of the existence of this world, conditions were much warmer, with higher humidity and higher CO2 levels. There have been multiple periods of colder temperatures (ice ages), generally coupled with extinction-level events. Science tells us that fossil fuels are the result of millions of years of heat and pressure acting upon the remains of plants and animals killed during these events. The elephant in the living room here is that nobody wants to discuss exactly where the carbon in fossil fuels came from. We say "ancient plants and animals" and leave it at that. OK. Assume that ancient animals ultimately got their carbon from either plants or from eating animals that ate plants. No prob...that is where MY carbon content came from. Now, where did the ancient plants get THEIR carbon from? We know the answer to this one..we learned it in grade school. Plants take Carbon Dioxide from the atmosphere, and release oxygen. From. The. Atmosphere. So, if a plant takes CO2 from the atmosphere, dies, turns to oil, then I burn that oil releasing the carbon to the atmosphere, all I have really done is put it back where it came from in the first place. If I throw a log into the fireplace and light it, part of the carbon in that log will be released to the atmosphere...right where the tree took it from while it was alive. The only difference is that one was living 50 years ago, the other 50 million years ago. There exist many good and valid reasons to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels, including that fact that they are a finite resource better used for purposes other than energy production. "Carbon footprint" and "Climate Change" are simply terms used to justify taking your money away from you while the inevitable happens with or without any action from humans. All we can do is (perhaps) slow the process.

  • @danielschmidt2186
    @danielschmidt21862 жыл бұрын

    We can send sequestered CO2 to the moon as fuel and fertilizer. It can help build the infrastructure to remove CO2 from our atmosphere while supporting a sustainable food and energy system for earth and offworld settlements.

  • @Heliocentric

    @Heliocentric

    2 жыл бұрын

    Nitrogen is fertilizer, not CO²

  • @danielschmidt2186

    @danielschmidt2186

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Heliocentric you can create biochar from nearly any biomass feedstock. Then you can charge the biochar with rich organic microbial compost, all of which is carbon based. Living soil with a high carbon content will be valuable off world. Graphite, methane, and other carbon based products would be valuable too. Ammonia has immense potential too. The Haber Bosch process uses hydrogen generated from methane currently. We can transition the whole world to a sustainable economy using solar and batteries to produce ammonia with electrolysis. Send as much CO2 offworld and to permanent building materials as possible. Re wild as much of earth as possible by using advanced indoor and marine agriculture as well as regenerative permaculture and agroforestry methods inland.

  • @danielschmidt2186

    @danielschmidt2186

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@vivian3371lol. So silly. We wouldn't move it all to the moon and Mars. Just a billion or so tons

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    No - the shipping is too expensive.

  • @danielschmidt2186

    @danielschmidt2186

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@jessepollard7132 The cost of getting to orbit continues to fall. As space exploration takes root in the coming years, i think sending high quality carbon rich topsoil would be very valuable.

  • @beedude99
    @beedude99 Жыл бұрын

    I am over the Moon about all this good stuff. Thank you for your ongoing capsule of space news.

  • @xandergreene1748
    @xandergreene17482 жыл бұрын

    thank you, just subscribed

  • @xiphactinusaudax1045
    @xiphactinusaudax10452 жыл бұрын

    8:56 No, it wouldn't be. Rare Earths are really common on Earth, plus the moon has lots of Helium-3, which is really useful, and moon mining doesn't disturb the Earth, which we kind of need to keep undisturbed. We can carry out large-scale mining operations without harming environments

  • @lewiswereb8994

    @lewiswereb8994

    2 жыл бұрын

    Without harming moon environments?

  • @xiphactinusaudax1045

    @xiphactinusaudax1045

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@lewiswereb8994 Who cares about moon environments? What's so significant on the moon that mining is going to disrupt?

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@lewiswereb8994 What moon environments? there are none there.

  • @anaskhoiri3653

    @anaskhoiri3653

    2 жыл бұрын

    Rare metal and rare moon clay can change periodical table on earth, new element for discovery, learn and use

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@anaskhoiri3653 No new elements can be found. ALL that exist have already been identified and found on EARTH.

  • @showmemo3686
    @showmemo36862 жыл бұрын

    Must have NASA permission sounds like NASA is claiming ownership?

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    No, they do safty and the FAA is what grants permission to launch through the airspace of the US.

  • @PersonalityMalfunction
    @PersonalityMalfunction2 жыл бұрын

    Bloke, you need to post during live NASA streams or something. I've only just stumbled on this channel, and I follow about a dozen others and had never heard of The Space Race. Subscribed.

  • @kevinsamphere7874
    @kevinsamphere78742 жыл бұрын

    What a wonderful future for humanity. Some great ideas.

  • @GComas-jn2yc
    @GComas-jn2yc2 жыл бұрын

    The thought of mining ⛏ the moon sounds like an awesome idea 💡 & it might be risky or might not. Who knows. Why? Ok. Listen carefully. Iffy we mine the moon for many reasons for our needs, then the moon WILL GET smaller & smaller. Someday in a thousands years from now, the moon we all see in the sky will be like a small rock 🪨 that you can carry it in your hands. Shouldn’t we be concerned 😟 about that? This mining ⛏ on the moon has bothered me for a long time. Perhaps mining on any asteroids will be safer. Feel free to debate.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    Always risky.

  • @GComas-jn2yc

    @GComas-jn2yc

    2 жыл бұрын

    Or build a Death Star alike like in Star Wars.

  • @stevenkanasta4919
    @stevenkanasta49192 жыл бұрын

    If no country can claim land on the moon, why would a private company need “permission” from one to go there?

  • @TidusCloudRulez

    @TidusCloudRulez

    2 жыл бұрын

    They still have corporate HQ on earth in the USA or their various country/ies the regulator officials on earth are able to penalize said company. I mean you Can't live on the moon forever Yet.

  • @MolloRelax

    @MolloRelax

    2 жыл бұрын

    If trillions of $$$ is gonna be spent to go and live there; you can bet your last$$$ that whoever spends that dough, will eventually claim ownership of the area that were chosen for the construction of those facilities. It is just another Real Estate potential grab. There will have to be laws developed here on Earth ; to insure that whoever has the capabilities of making the first settlement on the moon ,can at least have the right to defend its location from rogue nations that have the capability to go there too.

  • @Enzoa123

    @Enzoa123

    2 жыл бұрын

    We'll see how things will go on, that is, if it ever happens.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    They have to fly through the countries airspace. That is why SpaceX has to wait for permission from the FAA to launch.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    ONly to fly through that countries air space.

  • @DrRestezi
    @DrRestezi9 ай бұрын

    I love your channel. This video is one of the most informative pieces of seen regarding this topic.

  • @c187rocks
    @c187rocks2 жыл бұрын

    The equator solar panel idea predates the meltdown. Also, yes, you can "beam" energy back down.

  • @goldenbananas1389

    @goldenbananas1389

    2 жыл бұрын

    yes you can beam power back down, but it is not very efficient the solar panels themselves are not very efficient either. plus it may also ruin the natural beauty of the moon. it would also still take lots of time, resources, money, etc to construct. by the time it is build we probably would of solved things like nuclear fusion.

  • @ronschlorff7089

    @ronschlorff7089

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@goldenbananas1389 yeah, it kinda looks like early concepts for human flight, with guys on bikes flapping wings like crazy or the poor guy who jumped of the Eiffel tower with his "wings", ending with a predicable result!! :(

  • @erideimos1207
    @erideimos12072 жыл бұрын

    That was great! For power they should bring teleoperated reactors and just stick them into a pit 1000m away. Mining, processing, refining and production of everything useful in an assembly line factory, including water, oxygen, etc., into the tanks. The mining, strip mining since there is no environment, can be in the form of pits and trenches, that are later turned into habs and tunnels (with full wall LEDs showing the outside surface). Food is TV dinners and water they have. I think a continual presence of 11 crew rotated every six months, plus facilities for double, would be sufficient to prove the concept. Once everyone knows the cost and risk, people/orgs can build their own copies.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    Just wait until an advertising exec gets the idea to put a logo on the moon that is visible from Earth.

  • @ResidualSelfImage

    @ResidualSelfImage

    2 жыл бұрын

    teleoperator commands would take too long to execute on the moon... anything you send to the moon would need to be automated and self sufficient. Six months on the moon would likely make many humans sterile afterwards and they would start losing noticable muscle mass .by the third month. so that coming back to Earth could end up being a death sentence

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@ResidualSelfImage not anymore than the rovers that have been sent to the Moon.

  • @kevincrosby1760

    @kevincrosby1760

    2 жыл бұрын

    @The Richest Man In Babylon "Meanwhile kids die every day of Beri Beri et al..... in the tropics". That, my friend, is a POLITICAL issue, NOT a SCIENCE issue. In many small (and some large) countries around the world, a healthy and educated populace is the government's worst nightmare. When a person is isolated and uneducated, they will not realize that better conditions exist elsewhere. When a person's existence revolves around a daily struggle to get enough to eat to repeat the process the next day, they will generally not be able to consider actually changing their circumstances. Most of the starving and disease-ridden people living in "third-world" countries have "leaders" who get fat on imported food, receive the best of modern health care, ride around in limos, and have a private jet sitting on the tarmac if they want to be elsewhere. North Korea comes to mind.

  • @bighands69

    @bighands69

    2 жыл бұрын

    @The Richest Man In Babylon So what countries are you talking about in terms of kids dying. Should easy for you to answer.

  • @hikodzu
    @hikodzu2 жыл бұрын

    One thing I would like to do in moon is sipping coffee while watching earth n the view of the moon of the glass dome or something like that

  • @ronschlorff7089

    @ronschlorff7089

    2 жыл бұрын

    Considering the scarcity of water on the moon, your coffee will likely be brewed with recycled piss!! Enjoy your cup dude!! :D LOL

  • @jaxoblabla
    @jaxoblabla2 жыл бұрын

    LOL. love the solar flare image

  • @CowboyJoffary
    @CowboyJoffary2 жыл бұрын

    The moon is a stepping point I would love to make it there and live

  • @ronschlorff7089

    @ronschlorff7089

    2 жыл бұрын

    Better smarten yourself up first. Early explorers will have skills needed, maybe PhD's (especially geology, physics, astronomy) or M.D.'s (in case your appendix bursts on the moon), or mining experience (that would be an easy route)! Good luck!

  • @GlennJTison
    @GlennJTison2 жыл бұрын

    Moon observatories are a good idea. The simplest would be a radio telescope and/or spun pool of mercury, forming a large parabolic mirror. But there will be clutter in the moons orbit, too, if we are there. Rare earth metals have been identified. He3 also could be mined there from the regolith. The first Lunar Starship can bring 100 tons of machinery to the moon, which is a shopping list I'd like to see. A Tesla Cybertruck with a plow Could be 3 tons of it.

  • @mikeg6633
    @mikeg66332 жыл бұрын

    I'm excited to see the advancement s in 3D printing

  • @jgus6
    @jgus69 ай бұрын

    I 100% thought that last one was the lead up for a backblaze sponsorship 🤣

  • @isbestlizard
    @isbestlizard2 жыл бұрын

    55 to 60K is cold enough for superconductors so just dig some trenches for the cables and maybe you could wire it all up with no losses :D

  • @clarencehopkins7832
    @clarencehopkins78322 жыл бұрын

    Excellent stuff bro, I’ll go

  • @Coinz8
    @Coinz8 Жыл бұрын

    "Protect from solar flares" *Shows a picture of Tien!* LOL omg

  • @rushdHBTS
    @rushdHBTS2 жыл бұрын

    Good ideas. Al others aspects have to be considered.

  • @ShiftingDrifter
    @ShiftingDrifter Жыл бұрын

    Update (Ref 8:40): Recent studies released by NIST state there ARE in fact rare elements worthy of investing in mining operations. On Sep 8th 2022, China announced successfully harvesting Helium-3. This was big news, not only for the fusion design community, but also because it had been theorized for decades that the lunar surface - without atmosphere - makes it a perfect breeding ground for elements like Helium-3 difficult to locate or synthesis on earth. Thus, justifying lunar mining investment long term. Still, great video!

  • @myungsukim
    @myungsukim2 жыл бұрын

    'Human Protection' from the space atmosphere was the intentions of the Boring company. Appreciated.

  • @SovietMOB
    @SovietMOB2 жыл бұрын

    I always have coffee while watching radar, everybody knows that!

  • 2 жыл бұрын

    Great video

  • @clarencehopkins7832
    @clarencehopkins78322 жыл бұрын

    Let’s get this done

  • @RickyDownhillRDH
    @RickyDownhillRDH2 жыл бұрын

    Nice looking rocket there at 7:39! It takes Bezo's to a whole other level!! 😂

  • @HookedTapater
    @HookedTapater Жыл бұрын

    Nasa using Orion to dock with starship HLS is like taking your bicycle 90% of your roadtrip to get your lamborgini tour bus for the last 10%

  • @philipcraig6152
    @philipcraig61522 жыл бұрын

    Solar ring sounds good with nuclear and also, a dome village to support a colony of 1000 people to start. A large orbiting outpost to hold at least 100 people would be good too. Setting up green houses on the surface to grow plants and good would be good also!

  • @Alexander_Kale

    @Alexander_Kale

    2 жыл бұрын

    If you have the industrial capacity to build something as preposterous as a ring of solar panels around the moon, and the astronomical budget to afford that project - then you have the capacity to build a hundred times as many on Earth instead, complete with battery plants. Loved the video, but that was a very, very nonsensical point..

  • @abvmoose87
    @abvmoose87Ай бұрын

    Asking the right questions I hear..

  • @marstheplanet477
    @marstheplanet4772 жыл бұрын

    imagine in the future and you look up and see lights on the moon

  • @MolloRelax

    @MolloRelax

    2 жыл бұрын

    I have my doubts that the lights coming from any moon city would out shine the reflected sunlight. And the lights from cities on the dark side would simply be out of sight .

  • @marstheplanet477

    @marstheplanet477

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@MolloRelax what if its a new moon and not a full moon

  • @MolloRelax

    @MolloRelax

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@marstheplanet477 whenever I look at a new moon light sliver..it's always really close to the horizon .I believe this observable phenomenon would be applicable to every observer. ...no matter where they observe it from. And whenever you see a big part of the Moon during daylight it would be too bright to observe any light coming from it. I believe the only time you could see a City Light from the Moon would be during a full moon eclipse in my opinion

  • @marstheplanet477

    @marstheplanet477

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@MolloRelax ok

  • @Paul_Bearden
    @Paul_Bearden2 жыл бұрын

    An interesting fact about being on the moon, is that the Earth appears stationary in the lunar Sky relative to your position on the lunar surface. This is because the Moon is phase locked with the Earth, this means the same side is always facing us. The phases of the moon are the day and night cycle, which lasts about 30 days.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    29.5 days.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    which is not relevent. even for navigation.

  • @Paul_Bearden

    @Paul_Bearden

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@jessepollard7132 navigation in space is accomplished using an astrolabe.

  • @drpicmeup

    @drpicmeup

    2 жыл бұрын

    It's more so tidal locking rather than phase locking.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Paul_Bearden Navigation on the moon would be by using a lunar GPS.

  • @nickdonovan1447
    @nickdonovan1447 Жыл бұрын

    I hope that they name it Moonbase Alpha.

  • @danielvazzana7553
    @danielvazzana75532 жыл бұрын

    Suggest a rotating outer shell for reentry to dispute to heat on reentry

  • @danielvazzana7553

    @danielvazzana7553

    2 жыл бұрын

    "Dissapate"

  • @Not.a.bird.Person
    @Not.a.bird.Person2 жыл бұрын

    Beaming energy using lasers actually sounds like a terrible idea for many reasons. The first one is the sheer amount of inefficiencies introduced in the system. The second one is that you need to realize what beaming Terawatts of energy with lasers actually looks like. It looks exactly like the name implies, gigantic lasers operating at terawatts of power, it's negligently dangerous and that's IF things go the way you want them to go to receive enough power on the other end. Focusing this much energy on a small area would be massively challenging if feasible and incredibly dangerous if achievable.

  • @linyenchin6773

    @linyenchin6773

    2 жыл бұрын

    However; "inefficiency" already means "of or relating to being inefficient" = "inefficiencies" is an inefficient~redundant double conjugation. A faulty conjugation formed by those who breathe through their mouth, they overuse the suffix "s" as means to facilitate this vile~destructive misuse of the mouth.

  • @Not.a.bird.Person

    @Not.a.bird.Person

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@linyenchin6773 You are actually wrong, inefficiencies is just a comon conjugation of the noun ''inefficiency'', as in multiple instances of inefficiency, which is exactly what I meant when I said it. Is there any point to your bullshit or do you simply want to be unnecessarily and erroneously pedantic without engaging with the argument?

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    Not to mention putting Earth in a microwave heater.

  • @UnknownSigma876
    @UnknownSigma876 Жыл бұрын

    5:17 LOL 😂 solar flares 🙏🤣

  • @bdfwhhsb
    @bdfwhhsb2 жыл бұрын

    This content is great

  • @charlesrovira5707
    @charlesrovira57072 жыл бұрын

    @12:05 While building observatories on the moon might seem like a good idea, its *not* as good as building them at the L2, L3, L4 and L5 *Lagrange* points, pointing them away from the sun, (the *elephant in the **_sky,_* as it were.)

  • @michaelbaribeau

    @michaelbaribeau

    2 жыл бұрын

    plus no cold traps on the far side, they're all at the poles I think.

  • @mudpie6927

    @mudpie6927

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yeah but if you can build it from moon materials you make them so much larger

  • @bradshipley1713

    @bradshipley1713

    Жыл бұрын

    While the Lagrange point definitely is a better vantage point, if anything should go wrong and can't be remotely repaired, the whole project JWST would be scrapped. We would not travel there to repair it. On the other hand, a moon observatory could be reached and maintained.

  • @sliderulelover
    @sliderulelover Жыл бұрын

    Adding mass to the moon must be compensated by removing other mass, otherwise, the delivate moon orbit might be offset by the added mass used in building projects.

  • @expecto1982
    @expecto198210 ай бұрын

    5:23: That’s Mercury. Milky Way Mercury.

  • @anthonyburee650
    @anthonyburee65010 ай бұрын

    Moon Canada sounds awesome!!!

  • @donnyjones6959
    @donnyjones69592 жыл бұрын

    It has always been our destiny (from the first time beings lifted their eyes to gaze into the heavens) to travel into space. With all the fits and starts of the space program it looks as we may have a chance! Doesn’t it make more sense to focus our energies off earth than to do the alternative … finding better ways to kill each other and destroy all we have struggled to create!

  • @rascwinnipeg5802

    @rascwinnipeg5802

    2 жыл бұрын

    @The Richest Man In Babylon We could always stop making weapons systems to kill each other and use .1% of the money we save to make our species multi-planetary?

  • @RestrictedHades

    @RestrictedHades

    2 жыл бұрын

    @The Richest Man In Babylon the us military spent 2 trillion making craters in the mode East for 2 decades and NASA has only been allocated 20 billion a year

  • @Alexander_Kale

    @Alexander_Kale

    2 жыл бұрын

    Don't worry, we will also start killing people in outer space eventually. To think otherwise would be somewhat naive...

  • @ronschlorff7089

    @ronschlorff7089

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@RestrictedHades Yeah, interestingly, I heard, at the time, that the whole Apollo project was funded for a total of 20 billion, back in the sixties. Many a Senator howled, on TV, at that then, calling it a "boon doggel" and better spent on "the poor people of Earth". Now, since then, we've spent trillions on the poor and nothing has changed for their "improvement", since we first landed on the moon in 1969. In fact there are more "homeless" now (we just called them hobos or bums then). But, because of space spending then, we now have mini computers (aka your phone) and Corning Ware to cook in; just to name a few "spin offs" from Apollo!! Interesting perspective on gov't spending huh?

  • @expecto1982
    @expecto198210 ай бұрын

    7:43: That is you Gingey

  • @TinShackVideos
    @TinShackVideos10 ай бұрын

    Isn't there a bunch of helium 3 up there, which can be used as a power source?

  • @Bling_The_Visual_Creator
    @Bling_The_Visual_Creator2 жыл бұрын

    Someone beat me to the comment section.... DAMN!

  • @hallahgray3190
    @hallahgray319010 ай бұрын

    Using a mixture of gallium’ aluminum’ and water, all can be found and liberated from the surface of the moon, to make hydrogen using the Grotthuss mechanism with very little power output. Also, after the reaction of the aluminum two the gallium and water the gallium is available for reuse.

  • @chriszambrano6604
    @chriszambrano66042 жыл бұрын

    glad to see tien’s solar flare lol

  • @treyd3433
    @treyd34332 жыл бұрын

    Small modular nuclear reactor on the moon coupled to a lunar visible light observatory.

  • @myungsukim
    @myungsukim2 жыл бұрын

    Fair and righterous efforts toward space explorations would be the direction of the U.N. space justice council, with faith. Appreciate all sincere considerations with trust.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    Sorry, UN has no funding for such a thing, and the inability to levy taxes makes it impossible.

  • @myungsukim

    @myungsukim

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@jessepollard7132 Uncles are providing funds for U.N. It would be over than 40~60% of annual budget probably. Appreciated.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@myungsukim Still not enough. They have to have some form of enforcement capability. And the UN is not setup for that. currently it is by donation.

  • @myungsukim

    @myungsukim

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@jessepollard7132 What form would be the best environment?

  • @charlesm.9858
    @charlesm.98582 жыл бұрын

    The base is Already up there!! That’s one of the reasons we don’t go there. Don’t kid ourselves..it’s already there.

  • @thorn8988
    @thorn8988 Жыл бұрын

    The Moon actually does have something we need on Earth. Helium 3!

  • @nerdwatch1017
    @nerdwatch1017 Жыл бұрын

    I wonder is musk thinking of putting a future version of the Star-link satellite 🛰 in lunar orbit especially on the dark side of the moon? Mars as well

  • @davidroddini1512
    @davidroddini15122 жыл бұрын

    I think that the first two things we need to build are a lunar space station and a lunar cycler. The lunar cycler would be on a fixed orbit around earth and the moon, so a lunar mission only needs to escape earth’s gravity and the moon’s. After leaving earth’s atmosphere, the spacecraft docks with the cycler and ride it to the moon. Once at the moon, it undocks from the cycler and enters lunar orbit. At this point, it docks with the lunar space station. This would allow for extended stays on/around the moon. After a certain length of time they undock from the space station and catch the cycler back to earth. The transportation between the lunar station and the surface would require very little fuel; which can be produced in situ on the moon. So all we really need is enough fuel to escape earth. That allows for larger payloads to ship stuff to the moon. We could then use the moon as a testing ground for the technology we would need for things like Mars colonization.

  • @bighands69

    @bighands69

    2 жыл бұрын

    Once SpaceX gets Starlink up and running it will generate billions of extra revenue that will be put back into engineering and production for space.

  • @ronschlorff7089

    @ronschlorff7089

    2 жыл бұрын

    Sounds good, like NASA's lunar orbit strategy of the late 1960's: Blast from Earth to orbit, blast out of obit to the moon, achieve lunar orbit, descend from lunar orbit to the moon, ascend from the moon back to lunar orbit, blast from the moon back to Earth, splash down in Earth's oceans. Was easy peasy, for all 6 American moon landings in 1969-1972!! Even Apollo 13 did it, w/o the landing of course! :D LOL

  • @scottpugmire5449
    @scottpugmire54492 жыл бұрын

    I expect to see an AWS datacenter offering Lunar Glacier archives.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    a more stable seed bank.

  • @ThermalSpace
    @ThermalSpace2 жыл бұрын

    i feel like securing a building to the surface would be quite hard bc of the gravity

  • @leonardgibney2997

    @leonardgibney2997

    Жыл бұрын

    Don't forget JFK's (Sorensen's) speech. It's not hard. It's bloody impossible.

  • @dumxlekaktus196
    @dumxlekaktus196 Жыл бұрын

    Came to think of it...im a noob but...if we mine on the Moon and we reduce its mass, what exactly does it mean in long terms? I mean, yea there r not enough worthy things to really reduce mass of it. But what if o.O

  • @HellsMinion
    @HellsMinion2 жыл бұрын

    what if the base has been there for many years already and we are just taking more supplies to add on??

  • @srennielsen680
    @srennielsen6802 жыл бұрын

    Good video - but you forgot Helium at the moon for fusion energy at earth. The idea to lay a rocket down and cover it with Regolith was good, and robots to work is good too. IF we do it, we can in the year 2100 (or 2200) know how to make bases at planets and we will know the price. Maybe we could use this knowledge on Mars, but more proberly we find out, that it will be too expensive and at that time robots will be so advanced, that we dont need humans at Mars.

  • @bighands69

    @bighands69

    2 жыл бұрын

    That is a future development but in the short to medium term it is not so much of an issue.

  • @esitof3483
    @esitof34832 жыл бұрын

    Earlier i thought that security things was going to be a sponsorship.

  • @BodeBoi-dt3hg
    @BodeBoi-dt3hg2 жыл бұрын

    Can you do a video on if spacex will have their own Astronauts or if they will be nasa astronouts for Mars?

  • @TheSpaceRaceYT

    @TheSpaceRaceYT

    2 жыл бұрын

    Pretty confident they will be NASA astronauts exclusively for quite a while. NASA have the training programs that actually develop astronauts. Though we might see NASA astronauts wearing SpaceX suits at some point!

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    most likely a combination.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@TheSpaceRaceYT NASA astronauts get trained by SpaceX before they leave on crew dragon.

  • @ronschlorff7089

    @ronschlorff7089

    2 жыл бұрын

    Right, there will be many combinations, with special training before they go, by whomever is the lead on vehicles used. Even Apollo had non-military astronauts as well as mostly military (active and retired) and a PhD in Geology (Harrison Schmitt) on Apollo 17. Key is they will be very smart folks; no "goombahs", who just think it would be neat to go, need apply!! So, kiddies, stop texting, gaming, and generally goofing off, and learn something useful for a career in space!! :D

  • @albertansah1373
    @albertansah13732 жыл бұрын

    Elon Musk will be the first person to make a moon 🌚 base on the moon.

  • @MyKharli

    @MyKharli

    2 жыл бұрын

    he will be exiled to a moon jail for all his bullshitting on earth , they will call it a hyper jail

  • @frankdalla
    @frankdalla2 жыл бұрын

    This sounds like its a simple task, but the complexity of establishing any kind of human residency anywhere other than Earth is an enormous undertaking, and more expensive than can be imagined. We havent even scratched the surface of solving the problems of living long term in Space.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    no - the cost CAN be imagined - just by accounting for the building costs, and adding the support costs. OH, and the contstruction costs can be estimeated from what is expended on Earth digging mines and tunnels.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    Actually we have - people living on ISS for over a year in zero G.

  • @bighands69

    @bighands69

    2 жыл бұрын

    SpaceX will be a 50 billion per year revenue company by 2030 and that will be directed to building space infrastructure. The key to colonizing the moon is the fact it can be a launch base for enormous craft that can fly in space. We will see space stations that can travel around in space.

  • @williamgrimberg2510
    @williamgrimberg25102 жыл бұрын

    We will have to all wear lead boots and cuffs to slow down the affects of the lack of earth like gravity on the bones and all .

  • @Murry_Rhodes
    @Murry_Rhodes2 жыл бұрын

    Perhaps something like a subterranean super shaft with a 10km Radius going down as deep as temperature gradients would allow and fitted out a flexible lens/accordion type floor levels that self regulate air pressure.. Fill the lower section with water for an ocean to mimic our Earth's deep ocean floor. Delegate different levels for different purposes. Perhaps light the place with glass fibre optics with collection points scattered around the surface for 24/7 light and whalllaaa! Home sweet home with a bit less gravity.. :) Prawn sandwiches from the ocean and maybe even a little grain from one of the other levels.. That'd be exciting.. :)

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    not light 24/7 - there would always be at least 14 days of darkness.

  • @Murry_Rhodes

    @Murry_Rhodes

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@jessepollard7132 Not if you have collecting nodes around the surface as like the Solar cell concept but just for light to reduce the load on the power draw. It's fibre so it can be laid between nodes. :)

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Murry_Rhodes Still a problem getting the fiber. And small fibers won't carry the amount of light you want.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Murry_Rhodes Doesn't work that way, you have to focus the incoming light onto a fiber and it won't take it very well. YOu also need the lenses.

  • @Murry_Rhodes

    @Murry_Rhodes

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@jessepollard7132 Maybe the although the purity of the glass these days seems to have a refractive index that can sustain a global digital network for sending information which is in the form of light so the amount of light lost will be determined by the index or purity of the glass and yes of course you need lenses like concave dishes at each node to harvest and focus the light to maximise as we do with some solar arrays. I didn't mean just chuck a few cables around and hope some light gets collected also on this scale if you got the glass purity right you could increase the diameter of the fibre to carry more but then only I don't think that research would be worth the outcome unless is meant preserving some frequencies as the bigger downfall with this is the filtration that may occur of some frequencies that may be useful say in processes like photosynthesis for any agricultural projects.. It fun to hypothesise Cheers :)

  • 2 жыл бұрын

    Let's be real here, a viable Moon Base must be in a humanized cave under the surface. The Moon surface is not for humans but the caves are.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    caves CAN BE, but ARE NOT at the present time.

  • @Riteaidbob

    @Riteaidbob

    2 жыл бұрын

    Boy that sounds fun. Sign me up to live in a cave.

  • @ronschlorff7089

    @ronschlorff7089

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Riteaidbob Yup, even Fred and Wilma Flintstone lived above ground! And our prehistoric ancestors went on "walk abouts" from time to time to kill a mastodon, or something, to eat!! Seriously, "baby steps" may require some "primitive" shelters at first, on the moon or Mars. Then we'll have, much later, more "acceptable dwellings to reside in! :D

  • @americanindependantmedia9229
    @americanindependantmedia92292 жыл бұрын

    "The Expanse" is how I see our future. I have no doubt.

  • @charlesrovira5707
    @charlesrovira57072 жыл бұрын

    @9:00 Ever heard of *_Helium-3?_* (It's too cold for it to just escape from the regolith.) Sorry, but there are _lots_ of *_valuable_** mineral resources* on the moon.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yes, but extracting it is hard.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    sNo it isn't. it is only in the regolith due to impact from the solar wind.

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    NOt so much cold as being trapped inside. the regolith reaches 260F during the day. so it is plenty warm enough to escape.

  • @jasondepaul8146
    @jasondepaul81462 жыл бұрын

    I think this video is good but how about this approach. Send robots to build, and make a factory's there to recycle water, garden domes. Then send robots to Titan to see what kind of resources to use to live their without space suites. I sure at one point the atmosphere is breathable. Make it a mining colony and make large spaceships, recycle water, farms, animals, fish farming. We would have to bring a lot of these things with us to start. Maybe we could build Stucco homes?

  • @khanisbrown6424
    @khanisbrown64242 жыл бұрын

    Stadium lights should be used on this dark parts of the moon. This lights are very bright

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    Wait til they start putting advertising on the surface... then rake in the money.

  • @dalton6173
    @dalton61732 жыл бұрын

    Really forgot the fact that if we can make earth another place to put people also from mining considering the fact that at least mining the moon to some degree would not harm the Earth. Obviously we wouldn't want to mine at hollow however a few million tons wouldn't change things too much.

  • @powelllucas4724
    @powelllucas47242 жыл бұрын

    The US and China are going at it hammer and tong to see which will come up with the the most impressive accomplishments in space. That's much better than them going at it with real hammer and tongs.

  • @Mark-eb2jc
    @Mark-eb2jc2 жыл бұрын

    I think this would be a good test for a moon base, also Artemis should join with the Russia china moon base, we don’t want a cold war

  • @MyKharli

    @MyKharli

    2 жыл бұрын

    moon wars are inevitable , were humans for gods sake ..its all we do , mate spawn fight and die ..yarrrrr there's a reason military spending is at an all time high .

  • @Mark-eb2jc

    @Mark-eb2jc

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@MyKharli I said good idea, not “it’s not going to happen”

  • @ronschlorff7089

    @ronschlorff7089

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Mark-eb2jc sadly or gladly, take your pick, we humans are predators, not sheep, that's why we are fearless to do things like explore an unbelievable hostile environment like space. No soy boys will go, but alpha males will and some really hot "manly chicks" too!! Some very wild humping in low gravity to come boys!! :D LOL

  • @vk6xcj
    @vk6xcj Жыл бұрын

    Would love to see a moon base alpha ...

  • @leonardgibney2997

    @leonardgibney2997

    Жыл бұрын

    So would l but I'm not betting on it.

  • @alestursic961
    @alestursic9612 жыл бұрын

    It is important to establish a lunar outpost. Gathered Science will help developers to design vessels for deeper space exploration, mining industry, construction industry. The time to do It is now and soonest. Humankind has to find new ways to generate energy. Solar energy becomes impractical furder out from the sun.

  • @djdiscoworm
    @djdiscoworm2 жыл бұрын

    Don't hold your breath!!!!

  • @rh1960
    @rh19602 жыл бұрын

    The solar panels and beaming energy back is a little crazy. Nuclear energy is the only way to go.

  • @robertorzech8922
    @robertorzech89222 жыл бұрын

    First thing we need to drop on our soon to be moon base is a Thorium nuclear reactor (the kind that will fit into a shipping container. Strip it down i bit if it needs to be a little lighter and send those parts in the next shipment. we can leave it operating in the starship until the moon base is built . Then we can put it in an underground facility for safety reasons. That early power will be the basis of life support on the moon. Water along with recycling water and oxygen generation as a byproduct of Hydrogen production for fuel . Heat and lights for underground living. Electric excavators and boring machines . are a must for underground city building. Norway built an Olympic Stadium inside a mountain. That can be done on the moon. Star ship can bring 100 tons per flight with unlimited flights . There is water and Oxygen on the moon so sustaining life is very possible !

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    There is a good bit of thorium already on the MOON.

  • @MyKharli

    @MyKharli

    2 жыл бұрын

    is that the starship that hasnt launched anything yet carrying an unproven thorium reactor (good luck getting permits for that). Also we live on a water planet yet 2 billion lack access to safe water ..if we cannot do it here then getting water an oxygen from the moon is laughable . I have no idea where this thorium reactor nonsense comes from either , its been around for decades .

  • @jessepollard7132

    @jessepollard7132

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@MyKharli We CAN do it here - just that criminal polliticians get in the way. It was one of the things the Peace Corps did rather well.

  • @bighands69

    @bighands69

    2 жыл бұрын

    The moon contains most of the materials that are needed to manufacture.

  • @scottmoore6131
    @scottmoore6131 Жыл бұрын

    He3 is rare as hell on earth. It’s almost common on the moon.

  • @expecto1982
    @expecto198210 ай бұрын

    4:38: That is 6C. It’s receiving those from Metal-Plastic who want to go to the Crayon Moon.

Келесі