Every war is a bankers war

@silverbullet2008bb

2 ай бұрын

Have a look at the video on my channel about the war.

@mrshredder0076

2 ай бұрын

zionist war

@adifreitag8579

Ай бұрын

There is something to your argument. During World War I, American banks made large loans to France and Great Britain to finance their war. The prerequisite for the repayment of these loans was the defeat of the German Empire. The French and British were able to repay their loans to the American banks through the immensely high reparations that were forced on Germany through the Versailles peace dictate. Since the German Reich could not afford the reparations from its own resources, it had to take out loans from American banks. This led to the German Reich collapsing economically and falling into political chaos in 1929, when the American banks demanded the loans back in one fell swoop. This was the death knell for the Weimar Republic and encouraged the rise of extremist parties and the Second World War. Freikorps voran kzread.info/dash/bejne/rGF7rK-ehaS7p6g.html Blutmai - Deutsche Polizei vs. kommunisten | kzread.info/dash/bejne/m5WKmMeoc6u6fJs.html Dle Deutsche Wehrmacht im Zweiten Weltkrieg kzread.info/dash/bejne/momd1bePmrjRgso.html

@NotTheRealRustyShackleford

Ай бұрын

War is a Racket

@KrazyJohnny

Ай бұрын

@@NotTheRealRustyShackleford Smedley Butler

Roosevelt hated the Germans. Not the NAZIS. The GERMANS.

@idonuttylikezenorship4547

2 ай бұрын

Which is funny considering he basically did everything german free masons/ziocons/banking J elites that were "german" of origin told him to do or ate their propaganda up. Israel Zangwill, Samuel Untermeyer, basically his whole foreign affairs council.

@kintetsubuffalo

Ай бұрын

As did Eisenhower, in his own words.

@sharkskin3448

Ай бұрын

FDR was a Communist. He was forced by the Dems to take HST as a VP since his admin was becoming too transparently communist.

@WillyEckaslike

Ай бұрын

@@kintetsubuffalo both jayzzz

@victorsamsung2921

Ай бұрын

@@kintetsubuffalo Ironic if true, due to Eisenhower's own German heritage from Iowa.

His biggest problem was estimation. He massivly overestimated Japan's naval power whilst underestimating America as a whole...

@citadel9611

Ай бұрын

Yep, keep drinking more beer.

@billsmith9737

Ай бұрын

@@citadel9611well we won so I guess it doesn’t matter how it went … Hitler lost and shot himself get over it … winners go home and f the prom queen

@JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese

Ай бұрын

​@@billsmith9737Patton said Americans lost

@Us3r_2005

Ай бұрын

Yep, Hitler was a meth head who rambled nonsense saying America would fold like a deck of cards and Russia would fall in weeks. Completely delusional

@user-bd3ds4ev5f

Ай бұрын

That’s the thing. Early war the U.S. navy was im shambles. Look how poorly the allies preformed in the East Indies.

My Dad was caught up in one of the first peace time drafts in the U.S. in 1941. Later on, he ended up serving with an American Army Armored Division in Europe. I know he voted for Wendell Wilkie, the peace candidate, in the 1940 presidential election. He hated Roosevelt as long as he lived and always called him a " warmonger".

@TheCrayonMan529

2 ай бұрын

Wendell Wilkie wasn't the peace candidate tho, right? Sure he campaigned on it at times, but he we was pro war.

@susandalton7889

2 ай бұрын

@TheCrayonMan529 Well, you're probably right. However, Roosevelt's New Deal programs were a joke, and he did everything he could to get us into the war. Besides what my Dad used to talk about, I have read some post war published GI diaries. Some of them,, absolutely hated Roosevelt, also.

@HOLDFASTBEAR

Ай бұрын

Huey Long was most likely going to be president in 1936, and was staunchly against America entering WW2, but was assassinated by a jewish man named Carl Weiss.

@charlieyellowstone8248

Ай бұрын

​@@TheCrayonMan529Lesser of 2 evils

@normski262

4 күн бұрын

same as Churchill, Hitler was set up.

The entire world owes Germany an apology.

@RandomPerson-lk6cb

Ай бұрын

For what?

@DavidBarton777

Ай бұрын

Exactly, they were the biggest victims of both world wars The real Holocaust was against the German people

@amonke5276

Ай бұрын

​@@RandomPerson-lk6cbdeclaring war for taking back lost territory that was historically german and when the germans lost they mistreated of the german POWs and civilians also bombing of dresden and then splitting the country in two which caused so much suffering

@BlamedxJoker

Ай бұрын

@@amonke5276 I really hope you’re not from America

@amonke5276

29 күн бұрын

@@flyingsquirrell6953 what did the holocaust have to do with ww2 and the lead up to ww2?

oh fuck...history is litterally repeating in front of our eyes...

@f.s.4946

2 ай бұрын

exactly what I'm thinking

@stoke101

2 ай бұрын

Yes, and who’s behind it once again.

@j.r.8176

2 ай бұрын

@@stoke101 The global financial system? The petrodollar? The oil mafia? The military industrial complex? The elites and their special interests? The cowardice of the masses refusing to speak up? Rampant consumerism, decadence, degeneracy, greed, lust and laziness? No, I bet we're just going to scapegoat a religious minority and call it a day.

@mariosa9729

2 ай бұрын

​@@stoke101the ews

@Cabbage22927

2 ай бұрын

@@stoke101the 👃

“Let’s play cowboys & Indians.” “No, come on Adolf we always do that and you’re the cowboy every time.” “And?”

@canalesworks1247

Ай бұрын

"Wolfe" the fastest gun in Arizona.

It turned out that Japan was useless as an ally. As described in Sean McMeekin’s book, the Japanese non-aggression pact with the Soviets was strictly adhered to. The Japanese did nothing about Lend-Lease shipments through the north Pacific even though they were destined to be used against Germany.

@stoggafllik

4 ай бұрын

The nips were facing huge problems on their own. They're industry wasn't even one third of Germany's industry.

@LegendofNelda

3 ай бұрын

Big time

@cleanTron

2 ай бұрын

Germany encouraged Japan to sign an non aggression pact with the soviet union because they wanted the soviet Union to join the three powers alliance. Germany found out very late that the soviet Union is a threat and is planning an Invasion of Europe. I would guess Japan did not know Germany is going to attack the soviet Union and Germany did not knew about the attack on Pearl Harbour. I bet Germany would liked to see Japan declaring war on the soviet Union like Germany did declare war on the USA but i guess Japan honorful stays with signed contracts and had no ressource to join the fight against the soviet Union anyway. I guess if Japan declared war on the soviet Union instead of declaring war on the USA WW2 would have had an other outcome. Japan was in a war with China and the soviet Union had strong forces at the border to Manchuria, so they just not been able to act against the soviet Union but these strong soviet forces been sended to the west and counterattacked the german army at Moscow. So if Japan declaring war on the soviet Union it would have binded the soviet eastern army and maybe Germany could have defeated the soviet Union. Then the Axis would have all the russian ressource and an direct connection to each other. This decision lost the war for the Axis most likely.

@tommykarate9397

2 ай бұрын

This is the tragedy of Germany, in both WW1 and WW2 they had useless and weak allies, and basically had to fought against the rest of the world by themselves

@closegripbenchpress489

2 ай бұрын

@@tommykarate9397 the romanians and french did a shit ton but they weren't too many of them

FDR was the Joe Biden of his time, the two have a lot in common

@user-qg2og7ds4f

2 ай бұрын

BOTH SECRETLY COMMUNIST.

@viktoriyaserebryakov2755

Ай бұрын

Starting to think this Ukraine thing has happened before.

@orangecup1187

Ай бұрын

At least FDR as evil as he was can complete a sentence

@steverodgers7866

Ай бұрын

Stalin would have occupied all of Europe.

@123mandalore777

Ай бұрын

@@viktoriyaserebryakov2755 Go and watch the movie "Darkest Hour", it's a 2017 film about Winston Churchill during the Dunkirk evacuation (side note, there is a fan edit project called "Finest Hour" which splices Darkest Hour and the Nolan Dunkirk movie together since they are literally about the same event from different perspectives and came out same year.) When I first watched Darkest Hour in cinema's in 2017 the movie really makes you think Churchill was a brave leader who was dedicated to victory, however after the whole Ukraine debacle, I rewatched the film a few weeks back. Oh boy I saw it in an entirely new light, and the characters of Neville Chamberlain and Lord Halifax made a lot more sense and I understood them now. Churchill was the Zelensky of his time. The Germans beat the British and French and offered a peace deal, Chamberlain almost took it, was ousted unceremoniously and Churchill was selected over the favorite Halifax to replace him, even against the Kings wishes. I also later found out Churchill was in debt, and had the debt's paid off by the Rothschlld family. He was bought and paid for an owned and when they needed him they placed him highly with the purpose of never surrendering, no matter the casualties. His job was to continuously rebuff peace talks from both sides. Rebuff all peace attempts from Germany, and from his own party (Halifax & Chamberlain never gave up on peace and argued heavily with Churchill on the matter). Ukraine has definitely happened before, it was England and France and Poland. It seems whenever a world leader "gets out of line", the rest seem to all gang up on them and take them down, regardless of the death toll or cost. It might take the rest of the world a few years to get things into place, but it's seems that's what is done.

“… existence and non existence of nations is being determined, perhaps for all time” He was right, wasn’t he?!

@dieterh.9342

2 ай бұрын

Da haben Sie Recht.

@canerguener8664

2 ай бұрын

According to A.Sutton,FDR was left-minded.

@charliebates9098

17 күн бұрын

This is the sentence that really caught my attention too

@joemiller9931

9 күн бұрын

@@canerguener8664 At least that's how he wanted to appear.

@canerguener8664

9 күн бұрын

​@@joemiller9931And his wife

What's clear is that the armaments manufacturers manufactured the need for armaments. 😮

@elultimo102

Ай бұрын

Potato Head pulled out of Afghanistan, then gets us into funding Ukraine------Thus the military industrial complex continues running the country.

@LiftOffLife

Ай бұрын

Just like now.

@joemiller9931

9 күн бұрын

@@LiftOffLife Just like always.

They are doing the same thing with Russia

@Gigachadsik

11 күн бұрын

Except this time everyone can see through the lies... "The streets will run with blood"- Enoch Powell

@iforc

3 күн бұрын

They already did it to Russia long before they ruined Germany.

It is deeply humbling, and disturbing, to come to the knowledge that our forefathers were so grossly deceived into supporting -- and even dying for -- such an evil mission. Thanks be to God we are truly witnessing a true enlightenment! The darkness is being exposed, and retribution will surely come upon those weavers of deception who led our ancestors into an unnecessary war, in the name of the Big Lie.

@uchennaabosi7651

2 ай бұрын

But it seems history is about to repeat itself again, Europe once again is on the verge of war but the difference this time is the atomic bomb and the presence of a peer competitor to the United State in China.

@hamilcarbarca8659

2 ай бұрын

Amen. I am almost 60 , and since I was 6 or 7 I have been a student of military history. Lies! Deceptions! Falsehoods! The globalists have been brainwashing all of us for all of our lives. They hate nationalism and demonize it every chance they get.

@waynrbunyea7059

2 ай бұрын

They are doing the same thing now

@tobyradenbaugh8965

2 ай бұрын

EXACTLY And they at the forefront and control of A I and Transhumanism

@williamlyons8099

2 ай бұрын

I know right. I’ve come to terms of this years ago through other sources, but knowing about it, and not being able to talk to anyone about it is so frustrating. Who could you talk to about this without being labeled a Nazi and ignored. Not to mention, wants the memory of their grandfather, who fought and died in that war tarnished, and by trying to show their error they treat me like I’m killing them again.

Every negative comment seems to be employing the same labels and tactics of ridicule, shame, and defame any source of dissent

@victorsamsung2921

Ай бұрын

At least FDR got the Hoover Dam going ...

@LiftOffLife

Ай бұрын

​ ...and stole ordinary people's gold in the 30s. A thief.

@johnmosser6695

22 күн бұрын

Yeah, they accuse us of being uneducated and duped, as if they are immune to that.

Great Video as always. I always thought that the reason Germany decided to Declare war was because they were practically were already at war, glad you could provide substantial evidence for this.

@ZoomerHistorian

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the continuing support brother

@ZoomerHistorian

Жыл бұрын

Many doesn’t equal majority lmao, you’re so mad that you come on every video trying to pick faults and get nowhere.

@ZoomerHistorian

Жыл бұрын

That would be lying, so I won't say that

@ZoomerHistorian

Жыл бұрын

Everyone can see right through you lol, clutching at straws. Everyone sympathetic to Germany isn't in a Nazi group. Nazism is a uniquely German ideology, this is America. Millions of Americans are sympathetic to Putin's Russia but they aren't in any way affiliated with him.

@ZoomerHistorian

Жыл бұрын

@@gcsehistorylessons8465 You want an exact number of people who felt some level of sympathy for Nazi Germany? This is the problem with boomers. Read that question over again and listen to how retarded you sound. It’s a FACT that many Americans were sympathetic, no one knows the exact number. I’m not a time traveller or mind reader. Stop being a freak.

Same like Wilson in WWI and Churchill in both wars.

@groomerkiller3947

2 ай бұрын

Or the US Democatic party was for both World Wars.

@heyhoe168

2 ай бұрын

It happens today too. Covert activity, trade war, weapon smuggling. We are in the middle of undeclared ww3.

@Dias_De_Noe

2 ай бұрын

It’s all the Js doing They’re the ones kvetching in the back

@stichen100

2 ай бұрын

@@heyhoe168 You mean the unprovoked invasion of a nationstate because it apparently does not have the freedom to do what it wants to?

@scottbivins4758

2 ай бұрын

Wilson actually didn't want America to get involved in ww1. He grew up in the south during the civil war an reconstruction. So he knew what war looked like he did how send weapons an shit to the allies. Wilsons hand was pushed by Germany now i dont like wilson but i will defend him on that.

If we had stayed the hell out of World War One, there never would have been a World War Two.

@rickremco6275

Ай бұрын

Indeed. WW2 was WW1 part 2,

@dannys7549

Ай бұрын

US contribution in WW I wasen't a tide turner. Considering US soldiers brought the Spanish Flu with them in retrospect it would had been better if you haden't intervened. With so many other things.

David Irving history books are the most important contribution to WW2 literature

@ryancampbell1252

7 ай бұрын

@@ZoomerHistorian I've spoken with a couple Brits who know who he is, and he is still well regarded around those who think for themselves.

@ryancampbell1252

6 ай бұрын

@@TheEmperorYTP so you believe in the official narrative of the holocau$t, name one other historical protected by law?

@NoahBodze

3 ай бұрын

@@ZoomerHistorian Per this topic - Irving called FDR America’s greatest president. That was a red flag - though he said this because of the way FDR fleeced Britain of its imperial possessions. All history is simulacra.

@Threemore650

2 ай бұрын

@@ryancampbell1252I’m a Brit who knows who he is! How horrid they picked Tim Piggot Smith to portray him. David is a handsome man of noble bearing. They did the reverse with whatserface… the Jewish woman. An absolute trout in real life, they found a pretty woman to portray _her_ All is vanity.

@ryancampbell1252

2 ай бұрын

@@Threemore650 the hag Lipstadt

1:21 I don't think "he'd be lost for words"; instead he would have said: "I told you so" or "Why didn't you listen" or "You should have read my autobiography"

Another mention that would be nice to add to this topic of the US being a warmonger State, is how they literally attacked Brazilian convoys in the Atlantic disguised as German U-Boats, there was a veteran pilot of the Brazilian Air Force at the time, that stated that he tried to contact the crew of a submarine off the coast of Brazil, and they started speaking poor German with an American accent, an then they started speaking English, thinking the pilot wouldn't note the difference, when he reported back to the Armed Forces Command, they silenced him. And important note: they were the same Armed Forces that planned a Coup in the Brazilian government in 1964 against the Non-Aligned but Chinese-friendly Jango, and with total backup from the CIA. Nice video bro.

@pamrusso3556

2 ай бұрын

Where did you read this brother?

@salomaobulgaro

2 ай бұрын

@@pamrusso3556 kzread.info/dash/bejne/h6RkyJOQdNyXXbQ.htmlsi=uty-tINDQbMjxc5O this

@tpxchallenger

Ай бұрын

No, they didn't. German U-Boats began sinking Brazilian ships in 1941. The British seized several Brazilian ships trading with Germany before Brazil entered the war on the Allies side.

@salomaobulgaro

Ай бұрын

@@pamrusso3556 in a documentary about the persecution of German, Italian and Japanese Minorities in Brazil

@salomaobulgaro

Ай бұрын

@@tpxchallenger yeah, the guy was there, and it was in 1941, and the British seizing Brazilian ships is not even worse then? You heard about the Condor Plan? That Roosevelt threatened us to go to his war?

You should do a video on the Rhine Meadow camps

@susandalton7889

2 ай бұрын

Absolutely! I was unaware of them until I red James Braque's book, "Other Losses". Thanks to my heritage on one side of the family, I've also read some accounts of those camps in German. Contrary to the prevailing mythology, even today, the Allies were certainly not always the " good guys".

@StigFerrari

2 ай бұрын

Just ordered a copy 👍 The real holocaust ?

@tpxchallenger

Ай бұрын

Yes, a genuine exposing of "Other Losses" as the deliberate fraud that it is would be great. This channel would never do that, though.

@susandalton7889

Ай бұрын

@tpxchallenger If that book was an utter fraud, why do some Germans even today have ceremonies at the graveside of those who died in those camps? If you care to look, there is also testimony by former Allied soldiers who were there. By no means am I excusing bad German behavior during World War Two. However, our side did bad things also. My father was a U.S. Army soldier in Europe during that time. His diaries mentioned events such as American troops also shooting German troops after they had surrendered on occasion.

@WillyEckaslike

Ай бұрын

@@susandalton7889 disarmed enemy combatants not pows who would have been monitored by the redX

Turns out the more you research his logic, thought process and reasoning, the more you realize he was right about nearly everything.

@ccRebel1776

2 ай бұрын

Yep. I've been reading A.H.'s famous book over the last few days. The parallels between what they were doing to Austria/Germany are identical to what is happening in all Western countries today (destruction of culture, country, family, economy etc.) It's a very eye opening read. He was right - Revelation 2:9.

@chrisdubs1928

2 ай бұрын

Bruh, this guy just said that offering aid to France (an ally) was some kind of dubious plot to prolong war in Europe. That is the most unhinged twist of perspective I have ever heard. Not supporting German conquest = War Mongering. Got it hahaha

@Mere-Lachaiselongue

2 ай бұрын

And the fact that like 90% of comments regarding *him* get sent to the void

@michaelmccabe3079

2 ай бұрын

Only if humans are livestock that exist to worship and sacrifice for the state. The Soviet Union had the same philosophy, but was far more effective. The minute you factor human nature into the equation, all socialism falls to pieces.

@chrisdubs1928

2 ай бұрын

@@Mere-Lachaiselongue similar to how every comment I leave on this channel gets deleted because I dare to disagree.

However you dice this up, Germany's loss in WWII was the world's loss...just look at us now. "We fought the wrong enemy" (Patton).

*_The more things change, the more they stay the same._* _Shepherd_ MW2 OG

Don't forget, Roosevelt deliberately moved a large part of americas war ships to hawaii a few weeks before the attack because he hoped the japanese would respond so that he could declare war, doesn't sound like 'unprovocated' to me

@thomaskalbfus2005

2 ай бұрын

That's pretty lame, even if FDR has hoping for a Japanese attack, it was still the Japanese that attacked, we didn't force Japan to attack us, nobody forced Japan to invade China either, that was their decision, and today Japan is doing pretty well without an empire. Japan never needed an empire to be a great country, it could have skipped the invasion of China and just went instead to building cars for export, the whole Pacific War was unnecessary and it only resulted in unnecessary death and destruction, including two atomic bombs!

@stichen100

2 ай бұрын

Do you know anything about what the japanese was doing? Do you know anything about the war? Do you know anything at all in general?

@gunterdapenguin5896

2 ай бұрын

@@stichen100 Course I do, what's your point?

@stichen100

2 ай бұрын

@@gunterdapenguin5896 If you dont see the problem with what you wrote then you probably have a serious mental problem. Same goes to actually taking anything what this idiot says as truth. Its n***-propaganda are you a n***?

@stichen100

2 ай бұрын

@@gunterdapenguin5896 That truly amazes me that you manage to type something like that then. If you are that complete ignorant of history you might not be that bright or be a genuin n***-sympathizer. So which one are you?

Oy Vey much kvetching, insults and ad hom arguments in the comments. Excellent work as always!

There is a case to be made on the question about German victory if Germany was able to starve Britain out of the war. After Germany defeated France, Doenitz said he needed 300 submarines to starve Britain into surrendering, but had about twenty seven operational submarines at that time. Churchill stated, after the war, that Britain was about two weeks away form starting to starve because of the U-Boats in the Atlantic. If Doenitz had his 300 submarines, he probably could have forced Britain to surrender. That would end American involvement in Europe, and Hitler could then attack Russia with his entire air force, along with Britain's air force, soldiers, and navy.

@pierren___

9 ай бұрын

I never understood why Germany didnt ask France to engage in the Axis war instead of taking money from it. Anyway your method only pushes back the deadline

@animefarts1488

7 ай бұрын

There is a fatalism to world war 2 though, so it’s a somewhat impotent question. A surface fleet made sense for containing the Soviets, a submarine fleet made sense for a British war, the Germans had no intent for a war with the Brits so they had no reason to build up for a submarine war

@John-pc2yr

2 ай бұрын

​@@animefarts1488makes sense, but why a surface fleet against Russia?

@thecoolestofthe834s2

2 ай бұрын

@@John-pc2yrbombardment and they had no submarines but a large and well armored navy

@gumdeo

2 ай бұрын

@@pierren___ Vichy France was very unreliable, as proven by Operation Torch.

Another fantastic video, thankyou very much for creating and uploading. One thing, and others here might have mentioned it, the sound on this video was quite low. Also, there was a bit where the screen went black for longer than I think you would have intended. The main thing, however, is the information within your videos. I very much hope you do not have your channel taken down. You would be well aware of the censorship that has been getting worse since 2015.

@ZoomerHistorian

5 ай бұрын

Thanks a lot mate, yeah the older videos like the one you're replying to had audio issues, but it's fine now

Where can we find the quote at 6:28

@T12J7

2 ай бұрын

Google "Adolf Hitler's Declaration of War against the United States"

@EyeTouchKids

2 ай бұрын

Who on Earth quotes Hitler. How is Hitler ever a reliable source for anything?

@ZootOfficial

2 ай бұрын

@@EyeTouchKids "Who on Earth quotes X. How is X ever a reliable source for anything?" Pick you character

@T12J7

2 ай бұрын

@@EyeTouchKids How is any historical political figure a reliable source for what actually heppened? ANSWER: They aren't - but what they are is a reliable source of what they publicly said about the matter. If you want to know what X said about Y, you need to read what X said about Y, regardless is that X Hitler or not. Like Hitler's character has nothing to do with the historical fact that he said what he said and hence quoting him is essential in understanding this war.

@ridkwngridken3863

2 ай бұрын

You are dumb dog so you cant understand wisdom of hitler, we all know america started ww1 and ww2 , read more books than lies of america ​@@EyeTouchKids

So many similarities between then and now with Ukraine and who already owns 30% of Ukrainian farmland now ?

I like the subtle shots at Oversimplify.

@lushe4783

2 ай бұрын

Oversimplified*

@sixmillionisimpossible

Ай бұрын

Overdownsyndromified*

How is it that I have missed this one? Glad to see that your older videos are as well made as your new once aswell

Keep publishing!!

6:27 what were the provocations?

@thelongnosehunter

2 ай бұрын

Europa the last battle is a great documentary with insight into ww2

@cristic767

2 ай бұрын

This channel is a stupid one. Don't brother to search anything, it's just stupid.

@theronin942

Ай бұрын

​@@thelongnosehunter very good documentary!

@whereswaldo5740

Ай бұрын

Like now sanctions.

Can you recommend a book list for me please? Thank you

I read a book that told of a visit to Germany that FDR made when he was a young man. Early 1910's if I remember correctly. As it turned out he found the Germans extremely unappealing and hated their language. He was supposed to stay much longer as planned but cut short his time and returned to England which he LOVED..

@tenanaciouz

2 ай бұрын

Typical Jewish puppet despising one of the creators of culture

@hoi4rat788

2 ай бұрын

polio-ridden mutt

@DavidBarton777

Ай бұрын

Because he was a Zionist communist Bolshevik himself. that's how all the Communists got a foothold in the government through the FDR Administration

If we don't wake up the same thing will happen again.

Thx for sharing....

Germany always gets the short side of the stick!

@theoderich1168

2 ай бұрын

"It is possible that the German will one day disappear from the world stage, because he has all the qualities to win heaven for himself, but none to assert himself on earth, and all nations hate him like the bad guys hate the good guys. But if they really succeed in repressing him, a situation will arise in which they might again scratch him out of the grave with their nails." Christian Friedrich Hebbel (18 March 1813 - 13 December 1863) German poet and dramatist.

@portugeseking7959

23 күн бұрын

Look at who's writing the history

All I can think is, telling this much truth must be bad for your health?

@ILoveDIEversity

2 ай бұрын

This sounds like a threat

@your_-_mom

Ай бұрын

@@ILoveDIEversitywarning

Why do you speak so fast?

@RandomPerson-lk6cb

Ай бұрын

People think if you speak fast, you are right.

@zupnanazwa

8 күн бұрын

The German Dick he rudes is showing

So it was even worse than I thought. All these quotes are also the reason why you can read and hear so much about Hitler but rarely what he actually said unless completely taken out of context. There are millions of people here in Germany still thinking Hitler justified the attack on Poland based on a staged raid at a radio station while it only takes a few minutes to hear to actual explanation and declaration of war from Hitler himself. Then one would quickly notice that this radio station wasn't even mentioned by its name. But these days people feel most comfortable to be told be the MSM who is good and who is evil. They don't even care if a good person of today is declared evil as tomorrow. All this in the so called information age where it is as easy as never before to get different views and information from outside the personal bubble.

@Ratselmeister

16 күн бұрын

The thing is they teach it that way in schools. I had been out of school for a long time when I first heard about the Gdansk Corridor. The anti-German attacks in Poland were just as little discussed at school as the fact that Poland had only existed for 20 years at the time and was by no means a democracy but something more like a military dictatorship. What happens in schools is skillful lying by omission.

@LizardOnAMushroom2358

Күн бұрын

His 16 agreements proclamation to Poland was also worthy of a Novel Peace Prize for how diplomatic and moderate it was. So much work was done to prevent war, but it was waged on Germany nonetheless

He saw the future where nobody else could! "The existence and non existence of nations is being determined perhaps for all time"... "One day my ashes will rise from the grave and the world will realize I was right"

Going to need a source for that U-boat incident in 1941. Never heard of it and cannot find any reference to it.

Roosevelt wanted war very badly, his own Will To Power was in consuming him...he even thought he could play Stalin LOL

@stoggafllik

4 ай бұрын

The Jewish banksters in America funded the industrialisation of the cccp

@dogwklr

2 ай бұрын

Watch europa the last battle

@iheartcicada

2 ай бұрын

Stalin wishes he'd be as publicly praised and admired as the American dictator.

@stoggafllik

2 ай бұрын

@@iheartcicada Roosevelt was only popular because of pearl harbor. He was a Jew that acted against White American interests

@phm904

2 ай бұрын

Nazi apologism is wild

Apparently the fact that Japan declared war on America, then Germany, before America declared war back on either nation doesn't factor into anything.

@statton35

2 ай бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/YqmX1KhrgKuof8Y.htmlsi=hV4TkJbuntvS4toa

@fortunatomartino8549

2 ай бұрын

During World War II, the United States began to provide significant military supplies and other assistance to the Allies in September 1940, even though the United States did not enter the war until December 1941. Much of this aid flowed to the United Kingdom and other nations already at war with Germany and Japan through an innovative program known as Lend-Lease. America already put its scummy nose into the ww2

@abeedhal6519

2 ай бұрын

It doesn't considering the actions america was taking all this time leading up to this. Lol they followed german ships, didn't attack them but gave intel to british ships so they could hunt them down. That alone is basically a declaration of war. Not to even talk about all the provocations towards japan which were all aggressive actions.

@samskater14

2 ай бұрын

@@abeedhal6519 you just forgetting all the war crimes and atrocities the japanese and the germans were doing during and before ww2

@TWE_2000

2 ай бұрын

​@@abeedhal6519Ah yes, how dare the US take the provocative actions of stopping its trade with Japan after they slaughtered Chinese civilianz in Nanking. Honestly its genuinely entertaining to see how easily you smooth brains can be tricked into supporting anything no matter how blatantly idiotic it is. Not only have you been fooled into defending the worst people in history, but they didn't even win! 😂😂😂 Say what you want about the US vs native americans but at least the US won. Meanwhile you pathetic neckbeards are stuck in your mom's basement rooting for regimes that not only started the fight and committed some of the worst crimes agaisnt humanity ever, but then got their sht pushed in so badly there are still US troops in their country today. You really should copy what the losers of WW2 did and switch to jacking off to anime 🤣🤣🤣

This sounds familiar…

@aAverageFan

10 күн бұрын

Biden is doing exactly the same thing to Russia today

Can you put your sources down in comments or descriptions.

@notreal-fo6kh

2 күн бұрын

David Irving

@Koose104

3 сағат бұрын

@@notreal-fo6khlol

I think the odds were really stacked against Germany once they were locked in a war with Russia that was being funded by the international bankers; to formally declare war against the USA under those circumstances was suicidal. Roosevelt may have wanted war, but it's another thing to mobilise the US public to be fully behind it - the Austrian painter played into his hands by making a formal declaration. It's all what ifs, though. To defeat the Soviet Union, Germany needed the support of the Russian people, but it wasn't to be. Germany was up against the British Empire, the Soviet Union, the USA, and the money men - it was too much, despite a brave effort. Thinking about the current day developing situation, I think Russia, China, and Iran are wise to start to form their own power bloc - hopefully this will prevent warmongers within the West from creating another world war, God willing

My father was in the Atlantic convoy. Before the US declared war, the German Uboats were sinking merchant ships.

@snokehusk223

2 ай бұрын

yeah, because they were supplying UK, their enemy

@marcuscelt7014

2 ай бұрын

My Grandfather was sunk by a u boat on a neutral Irish merchant ship. Most onboard killed SS Clonara. His ship was sailing in a British convoy and they were heavy with coal so the Irish flag was below the water line. He never blamed the Germans.

@lmilly1359

Ай бұрын

We were literally giving the uk weapons and ammunition.

@dasaavawarsuploads1143

Ай бұрын

The eternal merchants ships

@sixmillionisimpossible

Ай бұрын

WILL SOMEONE THINK OF THE HECKING MERCHANT SHIPS FILLED WITH RIFLES AND AMMO??

Fun Fact: A lot of the midwest used to speak German. Even schools were in German.

I can understand why Hitler declared war on the USA but to declare war on the Soviet Union was crazy.

@Putseller100

2 ай бұрын

lol, it is the complete opposite. At the very least they needed those Soviet lands and resources and at the same time wanted to be rid of a potential threat. The US at the time offered no opposition except for shipping material across the ocean.

@XavierY828

2 ай бұрын

@@Putseller100 Germany didn’t need to conquer Soviet land for the resources as Stalin was already giving Germany the resources they needed through trade because of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact. Also, the Soviet Union wasn’t a threat to Germany. On the contrary they were friendly to Germany whereas the USA was very hostile. Committing acts against Germany which were warlike even before the start of Operation Barbarossa.

@snippsnapp123

2 ай бұрын

@@XavierY828you are misinformed, the soviet union was preparing to invade eastern and central europe. They had 1.9 million soldiers in 1939. In 1941 they had 5.4 million. If germany hadn't invaded, they would ahve faced and even bigger force without the element of surprise.

@XavierY828

2 ай бұрын

@@snippsnapp123 I’ve looked into that theory. Suvorov wrote a book about that. There’s is no evidence Stalin was planning to attack. In fact, Stalin wanted to become a member of the Axis powers. Stalin through Molotov asked for this but Hitler never replied.

@kempergreenk

2 ай бұрын

Read Mein Kampf. Hitler always saw the Soviets as the true enemy. Hitler never really wanted to go to war with Britain, France, or the US. Instead, Hitler wanted to conquer bolshevism (which Hitler saw as just another part of Jewry) and establish living space for the German people with eugenics and ethnic cleaning. In Hitler's mind, he was only declaring war on the USA because he believed that the US was already at war with him unofficially. He thought this because the US actively protected convoys going to Britain and sunk German ships on sight.

Great post....thanks

Facts

Another great video!

@ZoomerHistorian

Жыл бұрын

Thanks brother 😎

im soooooo happy, I found your channel. ❤

WW2 can only be fully understood if you understand WW1, the reasons behind it, and the one, most important outcome of it (the Balfour declaration).

@Ratselmeister

16 күн бұрын

And the treaty of versailles

@bobbyfischerman4811

16 күн бұрын

@@Ratselmeister yes

@joemiller9931

9 күн бұрын

@@Ratselmeister And Article 228 of that Treaty.

@Ratselmeister

9 күн бұрын

@@joemiller9931 The treaty has so many overbearing implications that it is almost impossible to list them all. It is also worth noting that the Emglanders made the abdication of the German emperor a condition of peace, and have retained their royal house to this day.

Love your videos but can you please slow down a bit 😬

The Germans weren't as bad as most people think, most people view at the German soldiers as heartless, fascist monsters but they were just fighting for their people.

@alancantu2557

2 күн бұрын

You’re making them sound like pathetic liberals that were maligned by history. The Germans weren’t wholesome chungus soldiers, dude. They wanted to build a pan-European empire and defeat Bolshevism. They were monsters, and in many ways that was respectable. Certainly more so than the Allied soldiers, which branded themselves as liberators but then went on to commit horrible atrocities themselves. The Nazis did this through both extreme and practical methods, but by no means were they just “fighting for their people.” They had a vision bigger than life, and they were risking their lives for that. You should read more about the Nietzschean influence on Hitler and other fascist ideologues. Stop trying to moralize them and view the Axis through rose-colored glasses. That just goes completely against the doctrine of fascism.

Hitler signed a written agreement with the Japanese ambassador on November 28th 1941 that he would support them if they went to war agaonst the US. Yes I don't agree with Roosevelt breaking his country's neutrality before declaring war, but are we acting like the US getting involved was a mistake? The German's unrestricted submarine warfare was the same reason the US entered the first world war, is it not fair for them to be worried about that same policy happening again? The Japanese were attacking Singapore and the Dutch East Indies and soon enough New Guinea, and the Germans were in complete control of Europe. Roosevelt helping the British was a natural and a good thing.

@sboinkthelegday3892

2 ай бұрын

US petrol embargo starved Japan of energy in July 1941, that was USA getting involved. USA didn't have a populist labor union, so they strongarmed their serf civillian businesses with a mandate to ban free trade. USA was an instigator between free Americans and Japanese customers. And Japan negotiated a single-front defense by Germany, that happens to be a foreign state and not a domestic union yet gave better conditions than USA gave workers. Against a threat that already involved itself. You tell me, was USA right to attempt at civilian lives. The same logic follows when USA strongarms the serfs in Palestine. You make up these lines of "we are the same side" so you can abuse the people on your own side: Americans blame congress for stealing moeny into wars and Palestine blames Israel that calims they're not responsible for civilian death at their targets on land THEY claim.

@26Guenter

2 ай бұрын

The US was warned during WWI of submarine warfare which wasn't what got the US involved. It was the faked telegram to Mexico of Germany stating it would support Mexico taking back lost territory. Germany bent over backwards for peace with the Western Allies in both wars and was refused.

@idonuttylikezenorship4547

2 ай бұрын

Ask yourself if the US and UK are bastions of freedom and peace than why is the Mauser rifle and the germans actively sharing their tech and military techniques to spanish, south american, chinese, turkish, and on throughout and before WWI to WWII Want to get into the topic of india and all the other oppressed areas that the zio-petro dollar and international clique expanded it's boot? The Mauser was the AK47 of it's day, the Germans actively wanted to help other peoples to be independent, the clique only helps when it benefits them.

@zen4men

2 ай бұрын

@@sboinkthelegday3892 Presumably English is not your first language? " on land THEY claim". Which land wh o claims? /

@TrueMithrandir

Ай бұрын

@@sboinkthelegday3892 WTF are you ever saying?? lol

This is the exact same thing America is doing right now to Russia....I wonder why.

@phillipwombacher9635

2 ай бұрын

And china and the DPRK and Iran…

@herrderr366

2 ай бұрын

habe ich mir auch gedacht ...

@tommykarate9397

2 ай бұрын

Russia should have never invade Ukraine! Russia is the largest nuclear power in the world and the notion that Ukraine in nato would somehow present a threat is ridiculous nonsense! Not to mention that Ukraine wouldn't have join Nato in foreseeable future anyway!

@attilamarics3374

2 ай бұрын

@@tommykarate9397 Thats just a lot of lies you vomited out.

@tedbed1389

2 ай бұрын

​@@attilamarics3374What was a lie? Putin confirmed asmuch in his Tucker interview.

Very good video! Along this train of thought, I suggest reading two books- "The Origins of the Second World War" by A.J.P. Taylor and "The Meaning of Hitler" by Sebastian Haffner. Both go into the detail of how the Second World War unfolded from a diplomatic and economic perspective.

And this hasnt been censored yet?

@zupnanazwa

8 күн бұрын

Why would stand ups be punished?

Another awesome video. Keep em' up.

They also killed JFK

Danke für deine Arbeit!

5:06 What America gave to the Soviets didn’t even add up to 1% of the Soviet war production up to the time. It is American propaganda to make it seem like Russia could not have won without America. Furthermore, when the Germans were outside of Moscow, waves of Soviet reinforcements from Siberia had just arrived. These troops were trained for winter warfare and their equipment was tailored for it. The Soviets had a spy in Japan and the spy had just told the Soviets that Japan would not invade the ussr until Moscow capitulated. Because of these events, the Soviets knew that they could move their soldiers to the western front. Fact check me

@GFXwtf

29 күн бұрын

America and the british gave the soviets so much food. Without that food, there would have been starvations across the Soviet Union. What was the Soviet Union's grain casket? Ukraine, which was captured by Germany. That food was VITAL to the Soviets, downplaying it is ignorant. Also the british and americans gave the soviets like 14.000 planes, both fighter and bombers. Finally, atleast 1/3rd of the soviet trucks were american made. There, fact-checked you.

Well considering the fact sovereign nation states were systematically targeted by the IMF, NSA, and summarily the US military if the first two failed - I’d say the Hitler quote about the future of nation states being on the line was accurate. Which nation states are sovereign these days? Russia, Syria, Iran and China? China is draconian as hell when Xi feels internally threatened politically. We live in very weird unprecedented times. How russia went from a terror state with tons of domestic blood on their hands to being the most Christian and effective counter weight to this globalist corporatist satanic agenda our west currently represents is truly ironic.

@simonengland6448

2 ай бұрын

I'd say the conversion of the US by adopting all the worst traits of the empires it defeated and none of the good is more ironic. Up until 1991 there was still a (weak) case to be made for the US occupation of Europe and the UK. After the collapse of the USSR none. Yet Europeans still seem unable to comprehend that the US is not their friend any more. It's a strange kind of Stockholm syndrome. Edit: I missed out De Gaulle. He was the only one who really understood Europe and what America was up to.

@Aexgamer48

2 ай бұрын

The last quote about russia must be a joke right

@simonengland6448

2 ай бұрын

@@Aexgamer48 By what metric is the West, under US leadership, behaving better than Russia? I'd be genuinely interested to know. To be clear, Russia is riddle with faults, we can all see that. But I fail to see that they have done anything worse than the West.

One of Hitler's biggest mistakes, and a dream come true for FDR and Churchill. I'd think otherwise Lend Lease let alone diverting the main war effort to Germany while Americans were starving and dying, abandoned in the Pacific, would have been a pretty tough sell to the American public. The longer the USA could be kept from openly entering the war the better for Germany, every day this didn't happen should have been seen as precious. Who can say how much longer Germany could have held out otherwise.

I can't confirm the US warship attacking a German submarine with depth charges on June 9, 1941. In another video, you also mentioned Polish crimes against Germans pre-invasion but I can't confirm that either.

@louiscypher4186

2 ай бұрын

Polish crimes against no poles during the interwar period is well documented. If you want to look into the targeting of Germans in particular the "ZOKZ", the ‘Union for the Defense of Western Province of Germans' is a good place to start. The U-boat thing appears to be fiction I can't find anything on it.

@charliebates9098

17 күн бұрын

The Polish crimes against Germans (and the French crimes against them) are very well documented and easy to find ... The u boat part in not sure of... The fog of war a lot of things get mixed up! Especially if you're not the winner

War is a sum of provocation and miscalculation . Göering was agains the attack on Poland, He had an I.Q over 130, He saw the risk , but the O.K.W, didn’t. After the big beginning success, the raised the stakes and took much more risks. The USA enter the war in December 1941, 2 years after the Poland campaign, more than enough time to win a blitzkrieg war. Open a second front with Soviet Union was a huge stupid mistake, and fit exactly in the architectures of the war , had planned, which was making Nazi German and Soviet Union destroy themselves. And was, exactly, what Molotov-Ribbentrop Treaty was trying to prevent. The aftermath 25 million soviets and 50 million germans(air bombing), against 450 k from UK and less them 500 k from US.

british accent, immediate invalid opinion L + lost the raj + lost bhutan + lost ireland + lost egypt + lost aden + lost muscat & oman + lost trucial states + lost kuwait + lost qatar + lost bahrain + lost gold coast + lost cameroons + lost palestinian mandate + lost nigeria + lost kenya + lost sudan + lost somaliland + lost uganda + lost tanganikya + lost rhodesia + lost south africa + lost south west africa + lost bechuanaland + lost swaziland + lost lesotho + lost sierra leonne + lost the gambia + lost malaya + lost nyasaland + lost brittany + lost hawaii + lost guyana + lost hong kong + lost australia + lost new zealand + lost canada + lost newfoundland and labrador + lost thirteen colonies + lost belize + crooked teeth + beans on toast + pasty + inbred + spiceless + culture is all stolen + london fire + gay + ratio

@fjoller

2 ай бұрын

ya’r brown, ain’cha laddie? I bet ya still belivin’ in that whole morality schtick. best start reading up on dat moral error theorem. listen kid, let me be the first to say - stop taking that hrt, it ain’t doin’ ya any good. can you even comprehend basic calculus 3? I doubt it. (Wotan, Tengri & Hitler send their regards btw) try to steer away from that homosexuality next time. t. the aryan foundational institution of tocharia™️

@cmdrfrosty3985

2 ай бұрын

​@@fjoller speak English

@funfofa

2 ай бұрын

W

@Occam601

2 ай бұрын

😭😭😭

@rodrigocoockiemonster4460

2 ай бұрын

​@@cmdrfrosty3985 Be patient, he's clearly autistic or retarded

David Irving is not a historian lol, there’s way better ways of portraying Germany as victims. Work on your rhetorical skills buddy and use actual historians, or better yet get a job at a war museum and read the primary sources as opposed to secondary source written 40 years later

@qntcats5974

26 күн бұрын

Oy vey, these sources are not kosher.

@Ratselmeister

16 күн бұрын

Never the less, it's obvious that the Germans where the victims since world war 1 and the figures who wanted to continue it.

@zupnanazwa

8 күн бұрын

​@@Ratselmeisternuh uh

@Ratselmeister

8 күн бұрын

@@zupnanazwa Sorry Mate, cant answer you since KZread dont Show me my post anymore. Censorship is big these days.

@zupnanazwa

8 күн бұрын

@@Ratselmeister Yeah, for some reason YT uses roulette of what to delete. You sometimes can swear with no punishment or get deleted for typing "yes"

When your evil empire is seen as evil: 😱😱😱😱😱

@DABK2024

5 күн бұрын

i see you found a video that supports your preconceived opinions. 🤡🤡

@adonisparts1343

5 күн бұрын

@@DABK2024 go outside

I wonder if Hoovers WW2 book backs this up - does anyone know?

If you reverse all bad history into good You would have a mostly accurate history

except that's not quite what the Tripartite Pact said, "ARTICLE 3. Japan, Germany, and Italy agree to cooperate in their efforts on aforesaid lines. They further undertake to assist one another with all political, economic, and military means if one of the Contracting Powers is attacked by a Power at present not involved in the European War or in the Japanese-Chinese conflict." Yikes, you're not very smart.

@aaronray1907

2 ай бұрын

It's fashionable for Europeans and Australians to hate America and Americans right now. It's just propaganda.

@thelongnosehunter

2 ай бұрын

Watcha doin' Rabbi?

@RS-xx5md

2 ай бұрын

@@thelongnosehunter Accurately quoting the Tripartite Pact is a JEWISH CONSPIRACY!

Thx

could you debunk this show called "the man in the high castle"? i think that could be a cool series

@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044

13 күн бұрын

Its fiction

It is wide taught at least in Texas Schools that the US did provoke Japan and that the US allowed Pearl Harbor to happen and that the fleet was extended to stay in Honolulu longer. Admiral James O. Richardson was relieved of duty when he protested that the fleet would be venerable to attack. “I’m not the kind of person to say atoadaso, but you know what? Atoedaso! I fuckin atoadaso!” -James O. Richardson. December 8th, 1941 I also need to comment on the current politics that relate to FRD. In my university we are thought that in 1935 with the Second New deal ended "Duel Federalism" (officially 1945) which expanded federal power. Post WW2 many Veterans saw and experienced failed leadership and unnecessary death of a large majority of troops along with many finding out that the US instigated the War and resulted in many veterans running for office and shaping policy. If they did not succeed then we would 100% gone to war with the soviet union Battle of Athens (1946) Veterans realized that the industrial complex hoped for. A majority of Veterans did succeed for a period of time but in the long run lost the battle and the government was taken and for over 60 years was shaped to what it would become today.

@thomaskalbfus2005

2 ай бұрын

Yeah Japan was just peacefully invading and occupying China and then the US wouldn't sell then any oil, imagine that!

@marcuscelt7014

2 ай бұрын

@@thomaskalbfus2005 Yes the US certainly holds the moral high ground when it comes to invading and occupying countries

@evand8863

2 ай бұрын

@@marcuscelt7014in 1941 we sure as hell did. Do you have any idea what Japan did to China?

@user-pn3im5sm7k

2 ай бұрын

@@thomaskalbfus2005That's so silly. You know very well that's not a legitimate excuse. Where were the embargoes when Britain and France conquered half the world? What about when the Soviets invaded Europe (Poland & Baltics)? We gave them supplies instead. Are you aware we did the same exact thing to China only a few decades prior? a small little war called the Boxer Rebellion.

@user-pn3im5sm7k

2 ай бұрын

Maybe you're from the intelligent part of Texas. We were not taught this in Texas...I had to find the truth myself. We were definitely the aggressor but the American ego can't admit that

So much information, delivered so quickly without adequate use of pauses, makes it overwhelming to listen to.

@MrElken

2 ай бұрын

100%

@kempergreenk

2 ай бұрын

If you want more information from this guys point of view at a slower pace, an overwhelming part of his information comes from David Irving, who once was a supporter of Oswald Mosley (the leader of the British Union of Fascists). David Irving wrote numerous books and once said that he dedicated his life to "removing the slime applied on Adolf Hitler."

@Ocy345Vidz

2 ай бұрын

You can slow down playback speed on videos if they're too fast for you. I personally like this style.

Seeing how Japan made a non aggression pact with the Soviets when Germany was invading….never should’ve declared war on the United States.

The truth has been hidden from us in history class.

You are doing God's work in spreading the truth.

This whole channel is just cope lol

Funny thing… I found the war in europe strange for us to give it priority when we didn’t have a nazi problem. We had a Japanese problem… Japan attack us, not Germany

Yeah just like I baited that guy at the bar to Punch me, Except that words in any combination are legal and assaulting someone for words they said is not legal.

@AKUJIVALDO

2 ай бұрын

Uhu, and trowing shite at you doesn't count, isn't that right?...

Thanks!

@jessetellez3924 Who should start ? The extermination camp survivors ? The Belgian, Dutch, and Greek civilians shot and starved ? The murdered Polish, Czech, and Yugoslav civilians ? The 3 million Russian PoWs killed by starvation and untreated disease ? Will they be graded on their sincerity ?

David Irving is The historian DR T

Franklin Delano Rosenfeld 🇮🇱 This tells you all you need to know about why america declared war on germany.

@dantestanley4927

2 ай бұрын

Exactly

@allelss-oh8sj

2 ай бұрын

The jews it's always the jews those mischievous rascals

@thecrusader1095

2 ай бұрын

Franklin D Rosenberg

@robertovalero6186

2 ай бұрын

His administration was full of people that worked for Stalin.White(Weiss🇮🇱)who implemented the Morgenthau plan that caused the hungerjahr(hungeryear) in Germany.He did that so that the Germans would beg Stalin to invade the rest of Germany.

@patbuckley5607

2 ай бұрын

Genau.

Actually World War Ii started in 1939.

@duchaneaux

2 ай бұрын

War between the U.S. and Germany started in 1941.

@StephenThompson-jv3zd

2 ай бұрын

September 1939, WWII had been Raging for almost 2 years & 3 months before Japan brought America into it at Pearl Harbor, Imagine todays world if they hadn't,

@thomaskalbfus2005

2 ай бұрын

@@StephenThompson-jv3zd Japan brought the US into the Pacific War, but Germany declaring War on the US brought it into World War II as a whole. What was Germany's reason for declaring War on the United States? Its kind of strange because in the previous examples, Germany had been prepared to launch an invasion like in Poland for example. Germany was not ready to invade the United States.

@StephenThompson-jv3zd

2 ай бұрын

@@thomaskalbfus2005and Hitler totally over estimated britains resolve to fight & not negotiate peace or surrender, the Germans were totally unprepared for a prolonged war, the Japanese already had a pact / treaty with German, Italy & Russia, so American involvement in Europe was innevitable, my point was if America had committed in 1939, Hitler would have run all the way back to Germany, but politics is politics

@thomaskalbfus2005

2 ай бұрын

@@StephenThompson-jv3zd The Germans needlessly added an enemy they weren't prepared to fight, that is the cause of their downfall Germany stood a better chance of winning if they didn't declare war on the United States. The British could only fight with American weapons so long as they had people willing to fight, but if you add American soldiers to the fight, then the Germans had more things to worry about. If I were Hitler and I wanted to win that War, I'd probably stop at the Russian border and take time to consolidate by victories up to that point. Germany was incredibly lucky to conquer most of Western Europe, it shouldn't have pressed its luck and go on looking for new enemies to fight. Hitler had conquered more territory than Julius Caesar, and Rome wasn't built in a day! The Germans kept on pressing their luck and taking on greater and greater enemies until they lost, a wiser German leader would have stopped when he knew he was ahead!

Thanks

War started in 39

@ZoomerHistorian

2 ай бұрын

It’s almost as if the video is talking about the lead up to the USA joining the war, which was not in 1939

FDR was an exceedingly over rated US president. FDR's far left policies did more to prolong the Great Depression than to end the Great Depression. FDR was an admirer of his predecessor Herbert Hoover until he ran against Herbert Hoover in the the 1932 POTUS campaign when he bashed everything Hoover had done. When FDR got elected he did nothing more than double down on everything Hoover had done wrong that only exasperated the problems caused by the 1929 stock market crash. There is no question that FDR wanted war with Germany. When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, there were elaborate efforts to attempt to prove Nazi German involvement in the Pearl Harbor attack, but all for not. Hitler detested weakness and considered the US to be weak. Hitler believed that Americans were to interested in their jazz music and sports and movies to have any kind of a stomach for fighting a war. Hitler laughed when he heard that the Japanese had declared war on the US because he didn't believe that the US could ever beat Japan. Quite simply put Hitler under estimated the US just as he underestimated the Russians and in both cases it cost him dearly.

@dogwklr

2 ай бұрын

America was protected by thousands of miles of open ocean on both coasts and friendly neighbours as massive buffers north and south, they could arm themselves unmolested with all the resources they needed to do so and food to supply everyone involved etc. Their geographical location is still their biggest protection and always has been. It's incredible what they did industrial production wise at the time but when viewed in the context of of how safe they were to do so and just stand back while the British burnt themselves out vs Germany, only to step in like a poacher in front of wounded animal and claim victory at the last minute always stuck in my mind. They let millions die first and then claimed europe essentially, we still live and trade at Americas will. They had no issue abandoning Eastern Europe to that savage stalin who threw 20m of his own at the battle. Isn't it unbelievable that Germany being so small in comparison could damage Russia so much? The germans must have been the best soldiers while having the least materielle.

@FuzzyWuzzy75

2 ай бұрын

@dogwklr Mexico was not such a friendly neighbor to the US. Mexico has never really been and really still isn't. Mexico has never really been a stable country since the Spanish left and ceased their colonization of Mexico. It was particularly unstable in the late 19th and early 20th century. As WWI was raging in Europe and the Germans became increasingly concerned of American intervention, they attempted to provoke Mexico to start a war with and attack the US. The sinking of the Lusitania was the official catalyst and first false flag for American intervention in WWI. The second false flag was based around the idea that France was about to be conquered by Germany and the US owed it to France to come to her aid since French intervention in the American Revolution was such an intrical part of American victory in the American Revolution. The real reason the US entered into WWI was simply based on economics. The US loaned a great deal of money to France and to England that the US feared it would never get back if France and Britain lost WWI. Many of America's largest corporations had supported the British and French and sold them a great deal of goods on credit and they were deeply concerned that if the French and British lost, they would never see their return. Most Americans believed that WWI was a European war that was none of America's business. They believed it should have remained that way. Woodrow Wilson and his allies in the American press and Congress didn't really see it that way. In my own personal opinion, Woodrow Wilson is one of the biggest assholes to ever occupy the White House. He was a disaster for this country, and we are still paying the consequences for many of his policies. When WWII broke out in Europe, most Americans saw it as merely a continuation of WWI and saw it as another European war that the US should have no part in. Had it not been for Hitler declaring war on the US after Pearl Harbor, there is a good chance the US would have never intervened in the war in Europe directly at all. Despite FRD's attempts at meddling in European affairs and antagonizing Hitler, congress had no Constitutionally justifiable reason to declare war on Germany in December of 1941. Only Congress can declare war, per the US Constitution.

@LordHoward

2 ай бұрын

In primary school in the US, we’re told that FDR ended the Great Depression (as it’s easier to explain to children than how other factors were involved like WW2). After learning about his policies, I always found that laughable

@FuzzyWuzzy75

2 ай бұрын

@LordHoward I remember learning of history when I still believed in the tooth fairy and Santa Clause and the Easter Bunny. I guess it wasn't hard to put one over on me in those days. I wasn't much older or much less naive when I first started learning things like civics and economics, and I can remember just how mind numbingly tedious those classes were to me. I didn't have the same interests that I have now since becoming one of those lame and boring adults. From what I can remember of some of my teacher's talking points in civics classes, economics 101 and history classes, I can't understand for the life of me how these people were ever put into the position to teach anyone about those things. I first started to really take an interest in history when I was in high school. My parents bought me two old authentic copies of Harper's Weekly, which was the largest and arguably most influential news source in America at the time of the American Civil War. One day, I started comparing those Harper's Weekly papers to my US history high school textbooks and noticed uncanny similarities when it came to the US Civil War. My grandmother kept a scrapbook of old newspapers clippings of every major historical event from the bombing of Pearl Harbor to the JFK assassination to the death of Elvis Presley. I couldn't help but notice that what was in my high school history texts books might as well have been carbon copies of those newspaper clippings. What is today's mainstream media headlines become tomorrow's history and civics and economics text books, so it seems. Mainstream media is a mind virus and the propaganda arm of those in power. There is such a thing as "independent journalism," but the more mainstream the journalism becomes, the less independent it becomes, so it would seem. Our civics and economics and history textbooks we are issued in school are no better.

@fazole

2 ай бұрын

​@@dogwklr In 1941, the US Army was 100,000 men, less than Romania's army. There were another 100,000 in reserves and guard. If you figure 20% of those are infantry, that is only 4 divisions at best! And half of those were sent to help protect the island sea lanes to Australia. US Congress ELECTED representatives did not authorize military funding. Considering how fast the US went from that few troops to Operation Torch WHILE also fighting rampaging Japanese who were hell bent on cutting off Australia, you should be more grateful.

Blud is on to nothing💀💀💀

@DeezNuggz

2 ай бұрын

very intelligent post.

@troutthefish5356

Ай бұрын

@@DeezNuggz 💀

Great stuff, but you talk too fast my friend. Either add subtitle or I need to watch you at 0.5 speed which lowers your voice quality

@ZoomerHistorian

2 ай бұрын

Indeed, my apologies, later videos are fixed

@TCFair10000

Ай бұрын

@@ZoomerHistorian ref your mention of the focus group, please check Winston Churchill, New York car accident visiting Bernard Baruch

Are you familiar with the book “Day of Deceit” by Robert Stinnett?

It’s a shame they don’t and won’t explain it like the way you did in schools and documentaries there’s that saying the victor writes the history.

@gxv4078

2 ай бұрын

Guess the Victors wrote about the Trail of Tears, the Opium Wars, the Winter War, the Marshall Islands Nuclear Testing, the assyrian genocide, the Fall of Constantinople, and the Fall of Rome.

@gumdeo

2 ай бұрын

"For my part, I consider that it will be found much better by all Parties to leave the past to history, especially as I propose to write that history". Winston Churchill.

F.D. Roosevelt was also affecting international politics and diplomacy in such a way as to initiate a war against Germany as soon as possible. He practically extorted the French and British to abandon any appeasement efforts by threatening a passive American status in case hostilities would break out. The ongoing negotiations between Chamberlain and Hitler were actually on the verge of accomplishing a stabile peace, if FDR would not have affected the Poles to respond with stubbornness to the reasonable offers from the Third Reich, in which the disputed issues could have been solved without a continuous conflict. Chamberlain knew that FDR was threatening the British empire, as well as the emerging German economical power, as Germany was increasing its ties with South-America, in which also barter-trading was applied, which FDR's American contacts did not like at all. The world was supposed to become a big open market at the mercy of American business. The old privileges that the old British empire enjoyed, was impeding that goal. The German advances in international trade were a new "threat" in that sense as well. FDR's worst future image was that of a united British-German Europe, challenging America's power. The Soviets were another difficulty on the international stage. When Hitler and Stalin signed their agreement in August 1939, FDR could only respond by amplifying his efforts to turn Poland into an ignitor of war between Germany and the West, knowing that the Soviets would not follow Germany in a battle against France nor Britain. From FDR's perspective, the goal was to prevent any cordial agreement between Britain, France and Germany, thereby enabling a war against Germany, taking that hated competitor out of the equation. The British empire, that older and larger competitor, would be conveniently weakened in that same process, as the war would certainly digest its resources and wealth. And that's how it all unfolded indeed: Britain lost its empire, Germany lost itself, and Stalin won half of Europe.

@vigilurbis3394

Ай бұрын

FDR and Churchill were stuck in the 1600s-1800s mentality of maintaining the "balance of power" in Europe (aka preventing any single continental European power to become hegemon) instead of seeing the danger of Bolshevism for what it truly is. The proto-neocon warmongers of America were fine in letting half of Europe fall to Communism if it meant for the USA to become a world superpower