Hard to continue with the "expert" using kilo knots. Not sure I can use the remaining info credibly

@enterprise59

3 жыл бұрын

The one who posted this should take it down and delete it LOL

@Pax.Britannica

2 жыл бұрын

@@enterprise59 No, no they really shouldn't. The people need to know! 🤣😂

most of Japan destroyer only have the power of frigate

Right now, Canada is trying to arm its next generation type 26 frigates likes destroyers. Nomenclature does not mean that much when all countries are equipping their ''frigates'' the way they want. I mean, Japanese destroyers are actually helicopter carriers... What more do I need to say?

Kilo nots??? Should be just knots, no?

@SiliconBong

3 жыл бұрын

*never heard the term in my life

@dibjr

Жыл бұрын

In the metric system, Kn is a kilo-naught, I guess!😄

@dibjr

Жыл бұрын

And one thousand naughts equals 1 knot, depending on how accurate your knot log is.

What exactly is a kiloknott?

@rapidhistory3344

2 жыл бұрын

1000 knots

the name Destroyer comes from shortening the actual name which is torpedoboat-destroyer. meaning a vessel that was developed during the age of battleships to protect the battleship formations from small torpedo boats which where using swarm tactic to attack. destroyer as a name therefore doesn't have anything to do with size nor is it a menaingfull name for todays situations and tactics. frigate on the other hand has been a name for a small to mid sized ocean going war ship since the age of sails. I have no idea why americans think that destroyers are somehow supposed to be larger than frigates? size doesn't come into the naming convention at all. the next lager vessel than a frigate would be a cruiser which name comes from a ship cruising through the seven seas far away from home port which requires a larger vessel.

@NDR-hn3ue

3 жыл бұрын

Thank You .

if the Tico class is a cruiser, it is a light-cruiser - or a heavy frigate. the Burke class is more of a heavy-frigate, or super-frigate. the Kirov class is a real cruiser; it's built to engage American aircraft carriers, far from home-shores. the Sovremenny class is an example of a missile-destroyer. destroyers were primarily surface-to-surface combatants, not general-purpose warships. that came later. they should be defining warships by their hull-type (width, and ability to withstand attack), tonnage, their armament, and their purpose. a frigate is traditionally a fast, very well armed, warship, that does escort duty, and light surface-to-surface combating. it's purpose nowadays is general. a destroyer is a fast surface combatant that dominates its tonnage and below - it should be able to engage capital warships, as part of a squad. it was once used to defend capital ships from PT-torpedo boats, but that time is past. it does do escort duty, now. a cruiser is a step above a destroyer, and dominates in tonnage and armament - it is primarily a surface combatant. very well armed and equipped compared to destroyers and frigates. a battleship is something you don't see anymore.

WTF is a kilo knot?

@rapidhistory3344

2 жыл бұрын

1k knots

Kilo Knots?!?!? No such measurement of speed for sea going vessels. I think the author is confusing how to spell and read the word “knot”. It is an imperial unit of measurement of speed and pronounced as ‘not’ with the silent ‘k’. The ‘k’ does not represent the metric prefix ‘kilo’. I hope the author will fix this very amateur-ish error.

@LadyDewBuild

2 жыл бұрын

That drove me nuts! and I lost all confidence this person had a clue what he was talking about.

No such thing as a Kilo Knot you knot heads.. It's KNOTS for water speed. You could use Kilometers Per Hour if you've been raised with metric drilled into you head, but water speeds are in KNOTS!

@xAndresxRojasx

3 жыл бұрын

I mean, TECHNICALLY speaking there IS such a thing as a "kilo knot" (1.000 knots). What there isn't, and will most certainly NEVER be, is a ship capable of moving at such a ludicrous speed. I mean, if the fastest frigate in history reached 45 knots, what kind of technology would a ship even NEED to be able to reach A THOUSAND knots, and how it would even look like?

@enterprise59

3 жыл бұрын

@@xAndresxRojasx I doubt the term as ever been used in Maritime terms.. so I stand by my comment.

@xAndresxRojasx

3 жыл бұрын

@@enterprise59 No, yeah, I'm agreeing with you there, I should have made it a bit more explicit. I doubt anyone has ever used the term "kilo knots" seriously. I'm just pedantically pointing out that there CAN be such a thing, but that it is so HILARIOUSLY impossible and unrealistic (one "kiloknot" would be like 1200 mph; and, as you said yourself, knots are used for water speeds) that you probably won't find it even in the wildest examples of Sci-Fi. And if you DO find it, damn, please tell me where, I'd love to see what crazy idea the author/creator comes up with to explain such a ship :o

@enterprise59

3 жыл бұрын

@@xAndresxRojasx Roger that Andres lol..

@esitu5655

2 жыл бұрын

@@xAndresxRojasx maybe in the future when we can fly around in space like as in Star Trek. Kilo-knots, so as to satisfy the metric AND imperial systems. Lol

1kilonknot= 1000 knots lol

Can u make a video on Indian nave capabilities

@AmanSharma-it2yd

4 жыл бұрын

Please correct your comment

Tell yall a joke, type 26 frigate.

@liudonghuang7611

3 жыл бұрын

My point is, type 26 has the size almost IDENTICAL to the current type 45.

Frigate , destroyer, littoral combatant ? Just a ploy by military top brass to hoodwink their clueless taxpayers to fund more ships from more categories of surface combatants . It’s like a boy asking mummy to buy more cast iron toy aero planes - he has a fighter plane , but no interceptor , and no ground Attack aircraft🤣

@GuyFromTheSouth

3 жыл бұрын

Lol probably i see 0 difference

@GuyFromTheSouth

3 жыл бұрын

Prolly right

lol russian frigate, smoke your destroyers. and their corsairs.