This is very well done, great job! It seems to me whatever your inclinations on this topic you can watch it and learn something without being put off by bias, exaggeration, appeal to emotion etc.

@rickpolar

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the recommendation Derek

@Vicente75480

3 жыл бұрын

Came here thanks to you, thanks!

@remarkablysquare3216

3 жыл бұрын

Great to see a big Science KZreadr like you finding this guy. All his work is really fantastic!

@ommsterlitz1805

3 жыл бұрын

Well the USA is responsible for 25% of CO2 worldwide and China 35% so with these 2 even if Europe was 0% it would still not change the rise in temperatures and ice caps melting because of US and China

@moosnatedog

3 жыл бұрын

You need to give this video a shoutout!

I'd like to point out that a huge part of the problems here isn't scientists, but poor reporting in the media, where there's a tendency to latch onto studies and treat them as pronouncements rather than... studies.

@icarusunited

3 жыл бұрын

Media been doing this since there Crier days in the town square.

@namelessking8905

3 жыл бұрын

As they say. "Fear sells".

@bcbwilla

3 жыл бұрын

Yes this is very true, especially in the case of the reporting of individual studies while completely ignoring the context of the overall literature on the subject

@garyfindlay5503

3 жыл бұрын

I am 62 and even in length of my adult years reporting has suffered a significant drop in professionalism and subject knowledge. I put it down to the pressure of cost efficiencies.

@joestein1144

3 жыл бұрын

kinda like the BS covid 19...

You made a statement in the Ice Age chapter that hit me hard. About how, in the Enlightenment Era, we evolved the sciences so as to find the truth & not simply trust authority figures to tell us what their version of the truth is... Only for us to be falling into the same patterns today, w/ skewed reporting & politicization of scientific research. I appreciate this video so much & am excited to explore your channel further!

@mikem.s.1183

3 ай бұрын

5 months late but: Great comment. 👌 Fully agree

In the Netherlands we keep a keen eye on the 'rising sea levels', which I put in quotes because there is also a bit of a seesaw effect going on with the land masses, and the fact that much of our land was sea to begin with, thus leading to ground subsidence. So far we're experiencing a very steady 2mm/yr rise since accurate measurements begun in 1890, i.e. the dramatic pictures of sea levels rising are a bit disingenuous when omitting the time scale!

@mcrand7887

10 ай бұрын

After 10 Years, 'An Inconvenient Truth' Is Still Inconvenient. Al Gore was wrong, I was worried we might not be around in 2017, given the alarms he was sounding in 2006.

@diatonicdelirium1743

10 ай бұрын

@@jje984 That in itself is not such a good measure, as 'we' put in significant effort to fortify and repair our coastal defenses against water. With natural erosion, huge swathes of land would wash away quickly!

@dp-kz5cs

9 ай бұрын

The knowledge is scattered about to confuse all. While japan just released the equivalent of 3 Olympic sized pools of radioactive water deemed " safe" heading straight for the great picific garbage patch!! Now we'll have those sea monsters 😂👍🏻 hueberous is what is killing this planet . . .

@ruyan247

9 ай бұрын

​@@dp-kz5csthe planet is trying to kill humanity since its existence, we are just retaliating.

@QwoaX

9 ай бұрын

@@diatonicdelirium1743 Plus, we tend to use current-day coastlines for maps with historic borders, which creates an illusion that coastlines were static the last couple of millenia and maps pre satelite imagery or at least pre aviation weren't that accurate, so we can't really use these anyway. Interestingly enough, some places are rising compared to the sea level due to plate tectonics or the glacial isostatic adjustment. Sweden for example probably has gained more land over the same time than the Netherlands without doing anything for it.

Your point about scientists being under pressure to publish notable findings is extremely well taken. I am an organometallic chemist, and the science is expensive. My science wouldn’t be possible without grants and partnerships with larger groups/industries. What do I need to do to attract funding from these groups? Publish notable work, and do it quickly. This often leads to papers and projects that are significantly less “flushed out” than would be otherwise if there were no time constraints. I am by no means saying that the science is any less valid, it is heavily reviewed prior to publication by multiple parties. It is just that the whole story of a system, even in my very small projects, takes many years and tens to hundreds of papers to verify.

@fsdds1488

3 жыл бұрын

And that also means that duplications are inevitable, I am no researcher, but when I began to look into one of my project topics I realised there are more than a few theoretical papers proposing very similar experimental scheme, for example I have came across a Cat State generation scheme with one oscillator in published last year, only to found later that other researchers had already proposed and done the same experiment with 2 and 3 oscillators, and yet the very first paper still get published in Phys Rev. Letter B, which actually confused mey for quite a while because to me there's no meaning to publish something people already know and are capable of doing better.

@donniehoward8488

3 жыл бұрын

Flushed out huh?

@N1GhTMaR3S15

3 жыл бұрын

@@fsdds1488 Mostly true to an extent, I am not familiar with the systems you are referring to, but a core aspect of science is to publish everything, good or bad. Things like this often pop up in my field, people will stumble across a truly groundbreaking result, and in the years following the real groundwork will be looked into. Take Buchwald-Hartwig amination for example, a Nobel Prize worthy discovery in C-N cross coupling chemistry, first published in 1994. It’s been 27 years and groups (myself included) are still branching off this field in different ways, for better or for worse. It can’t be known how useful something might be if it is not published.

@N1GhTMaR3S15

3 жыл бұрын

@@donniehoward8488 like an inverse toilet

@mikelynch-zeroviewz2507

3 жыл бұрын

I did my thesis in organometallic chemistry.. i made a 47 atom triruthenium cluster that was a ruby red crystal..

It’s here! It’s actually here!

@hamter8707

3 жыл бұрын

this is the last place i'd expect you'd be

@Cobra-zr2gd

3 жыл бұрын

I like you vids memerman

@Jmoricy

3 жыл бұрын

@@hamter8707 yeah

@TabBuddie

3 жыл бұрын

yes

@giraffeman326

3 жыл бұрын

This will be a day long remembered

Just wow. The music, the transitions, the animations... the way you logically built your point. Kudos to you and this video🎉

This video is simply amazing on so many levels. Thank you so much for producing it.

I really hate how KZread incentivizes quantity over quality. This is the highest quality video I have ever seen on KZread, yet it is also the most underrated

@mongke7858

3 жыл бұрын

There isn't really a way for an algorithm to determine quality so we are stuck with this system.

@TheDoomWizard

3 жыл бұрын

Feel like you might like my channel too :)

@spacenuts2781

3 жыл бұрын

All 3 of his other videos have gotten millions of views tf are you talking about

@giovane_Diaz

3 жыл бұрын

to be honest, I would like him to be able to get some works on curiosity stream, nebula, and other plataforms that can reward different production values than yt and our well known social medias, who just plummet more or less anyone who doesn't gamble at least a little with their sadistic algorithms. I'm more than happy ro support him when my country doesn't mess with every single thing that cross their financial borders

@wasdwasdedsf

3 жыл бұрын

@@mongke7858 lol theres nothing about the lyiing cultist antiscience frauds that own the social media companies that are unbiased or "its just an algorithm! theyre not doing anything on purpose!"

This guy deserves a team behind him so he can crank out more of these epic videos! Love the meditative tone and pacing, the transitions, visuals, and the thought process of the message.

@fredneecher1746

2 жыл бұрын

It's an example of what is known as 'peripheral persuasion', that is, it's all in the nice presentation and nothing in the content.

@kirstinstrand6292

2 жыл бұрын

@@fredneecher1746 So sorry that you missed the relevance. 🙄

@chrisdoe6890

2 жыл бұрын

@@fredneecher1746 just like Al Gore but not like Greta.

@MKeehl23

2 жыл бұрын

And that's how stats biased results

@agentorange6085

2 жыл бұрын

I thought it was insufferable. I stopped the video just to make this comment, now I'm outta here...

This video is better done then many full documentaries and movies. This is amazing!

@portfolio91

5 ай бұрын

Oh yeah! One of my hobbies is science, and they do a great job explaining uncertainty and the public perceptions. AND a great job illustrating climate change, how much is known, where the uncertainty comes from, etc. I love it!

The data visualization you present is unlike anything I have seen before. I think that the way you show data is very important to allow the average person to understand evidence. Amazing work. I wish everyone would watch this.

@rimka11

Жыл бұрын

did you check if the data is real?

@paulbeckwith5299

Жыл бұрын

@@rimka11 exactly, the models built by IPCC still have a lot of unknowns in them about previous data and how energy of sun and cloud cover impact the equations. Then, there's the overall CO2 vs temp equation over millions of years. If CO2 concentration doubles, temp goes up by 1.1K degrees and then there is water vapour feedback factor which was 10X previosuly and strangely that has been reeled in to 1-1.2X so are they sure about anything in a model with so many unknowns? I am all for going to nuclear and then renewables and away from petroleum as it's too important to use petroleum for all of the products we need in health care, houses and cars so we shouldn't burn it but I am just not sure how much we impact climate yet. It's not a slam dunk by any stretch of the imagination.

@hejalll

11 ай бұрын

​@@paulbeckwith5299As the video explains, just because we can't be create a model that 100% predicts the future and past exactly, doesn't mean we can't draw accurate conclusions. It's important to be skeptical, but to say we might not be influencing the temperature o ln the globe is simply ignorant.

@garethmccartan3636

10 ай бұрын

​@@hejalllprove that it's ignorant

@hejalll

10 ай бұрын

@@garethmccartan3636 I mean this very video is proof. He laid out 800 reasons why humans are absolutely causing global warming, beyond a shadow of doubt. I guess if you see this proof, and you still think humans aren't causing global warming, you're probably just delusional, not ignorant.

His videos are like a customized, hand-made suit. So hard to make, so long to finish, but in the end the quality is indescribable!

@aratirao9007

2 жыл бұрын

🔲SERCH ADITYA RATHORE, HE ALSO MAKES ENTERTAINING CONTENT LIKE NEIL

@yuser4440

2 жыл бұрын

And the "scientistic" propaganda is well reiterated, he didn't talk about the climate gate which demonstrate that the problem is not the mediatic process of science data but its ethical credibility itself. And history is badly summarised, with some bad errors, for example, Egyptians didn't develop an alphabet, Phoenicians invented alphabet that I am writing with here and they are not even mentioned. Bye.

@senorpepper3405

2 жыл бұрын

@@yuser4440 negative b plus or minus the square root of b squared minus 4ac all over 2a

@yuser4440

2 жыл бұрын

@@senorpepper3405 Math irony, that's smart like a meme. Bye.

@derekborkent2899

2 жыл бұрын

I agree. It must be very difficult to cherry-pick all the material and stitch together convincing story that Suits the climate warming narrative. Top marks for effort 0 for presenting the real facts.

So you reaserch, process data, create graphics, animate them, write compelling scripts, narrate them with a nice sounding voice, edit the videos and many more things I can’t even imagine that go into these wonderful works of art. It’s just so impressive. Mad props for you and people who work with you

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

People promoters get huge government grants to push climate change: Follow the money.. This video below cancels out the nonsense of this video. He missed 10 natural causes. kzread.infovideos?&ab_channel=CaliforniaGold

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

People promoters get huge government grants to push climate change: Follow the money... This video below cancels out the nonsense of this video. He missed 10 natural causes. kzread.info/dash/bejne/a6yhtrinlMjOmqQ.html&ab_channel=CaliforniaGold Do your own Research, stop being a frightened sheep. ⭐⭐

This channel is KZread's strongest argument for quality over quantity, well done

@orang9134

Жыл бұрын

Lemmino I would put at 2nd

Dude, yes! I love stumbling across awesome new channels. Great quality, wonderful narration, and really stimulating content. That and they're also not too short. I'm happy to subscribe and look forward to watching all your content. Oh, and COMMENT #15,000, WOOHOO!

it's almost as if taking a central, neutral stance and explaining it thoroughly can change minds, instead of yelling and berating whoever doesn't agree with you, boiling it down to "you have to be ignorant and stupid to not agree with me" thank you for this video, this was better than just informative.

@davidjorgensen877

3 жыл бұрын

"you have to be ignorant and stupid to not agree with me" - Yes there's a ton of that going on, but many individuals will interpret the message that "skepticism is healthy" as justification to assume that their personal skepticism validates their own self-serving conspiracy theories - and that leads to a similar or worse result. As proscribed by this video, we need to grasp and embrace the distinction between intelligent, open-minded questioning vs. the general vilification of science and academia altogether - and, sadly, a frighteningly large number of people fail to do so.

@fermiLiquidDrinker

3 жыл бұрын

@Myth Tree And just who, or what, is "they?"

@fermiLiquidDrinker

3 жыл бұрын

@Myth Tree That still doesn't tell me who "they" are.

@Dawgsofwinter

3 жыл бұрын

@@fermiLiquidDrinker That THEY is those loud vocal groups that stand behind people with megaphones telling them they are "evil" because they don't like what they are saying or they feel the audience is ignoring their antics. Its the people who create the "Gretas" in the world to go out and spew their political/scientific views. The They's are the fools who quote the Bible and use it as justifications for their Racism. And yes I put all those in the same category. In the end things like this will probably sit at a middle ground and there really isn't a way around that. By just listening to the loudest screamers or trying to get the most sensational 15 min of fame both sides make the problem worse through inaction and create the bar fights a lot of US politics and the politics on this issue have become. Does research need done into carbon emission and reduction of. YUP But it needs to produce results not 500 page studies of nothing that can be replicated outside of a lab for less than 50K (50,000) an ounce (yes in some cases an exaggeration or miss representation but in many an under estimation). Or such foolishly extreme measures millions are put out of work to starve. The real world problems with those ideas can be just as bad as the so called solutions. Oh they can just change to the new green industries... that is the dumbest argument ever. Where are these companies that are hiring in those numbers. Do their skills transfer (some don't some do) the real world problems with those ideas can be just as bad as the so called solutions. Companies such as this will take years to develop into the sizes to justify the sheer number of workers they would force out. Greta's little solution would have bankrupted more than a couple of the countries in the process and likely driven their populations so far against a solution as to have reversed any good done. So called Green Energy is a big victim of the studies with no resolution. We can produce the power. But not reliably on call at the times and in the quantities desired/needed. We can produce more than enough power to cover those times too in all honesty. What can't be done is storing it. Is research ongoing. We've been searching for the next generation battery since before lithium Ion batteries were even on the market and world wide billions are likely being spent on this. I've seen a couple of interesting alternatives but even they have large issues that will take time. And then we have to find out what side issues do these solutions create (solar has some pretty nasty by products from production I'm told and wind has been showing some worts with birds and the blades being difficult or seriously expensive to recycle at this time if it costs more than you make off it to recycle then its not really recyclable)

@fermiLiquidDrinker

3 жыл бұрын

@@Dawgsofwinter Now that you explain it, I can see where you're coming from-honestly, your criticisms of current efforts against climate change, and current movements against it, are pretty understandable. First of all, just to get this out of the way, I really hope you understand why people are beginning to yell into megaphones about climate change: nothing substantial at a national, or even worldwide level, has been done to at least mitigate climate change. The situation is getting _very_ desperate, and though it may seem like a lot of people are doing it just for attention, I can assure you they aren't-but their methods are flawed. The current popular movements to reduce the effects of climate change (namely extinction rebellion, but there are plenty of others)-with the way they tend to put focus on simple individual habits, rather than corporations, governments, or even the very roots of capitalism itself-suck; they tend to see humans as divorced from nature, not a part of it, and tend to advocate the use of band-aids such as tax credits to cover the bullet hole of man-made climate change. And you are right that current alternative energy solutions can have some pretty bad side effects that _need_ to be either ridden of, or at least mitigated-I can't deny that-but compared to fossil fuels, those effects almost nothing. From the perspective of a physics undergrad, current research on solar panel tech is looking pretty good, with cleaner, more efficient solar cells being invented on pretty much a monthly basis. (It's worth mentioning that experimental solar panel systems tend to be expensive simply _because_ they're experimental, kind of like how the old point-contact transistor at Bell Labs was _way_ more expensive than a standard transistor you'd solder into a circuit board.) But yeah, at our current rate, renewable energy can't take care of current energy needs-though there is a catch to that: Much of the electricity used at the moment goes towards things like data centers, where corporations have massive servers all under one roof; advertising both on-, and offline (see doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.08.004); and powering mansions for just a couple people. Provided we either oust the current political system with something cooperative-I'd suggest reading Bookchin's _The Ecology of Freedom,_ or checking out Saint Andrewism here on youtube (his video on the current climate movement is fantastic, kzread.info/dash/bejne/k61s3MeOY5qqZMY.html) for more information-or at least find a better way to manage current resources (such as removing data centers and the like), renewable energy could easily fit the world's power bill. Ultimately, we need action for something that, at the very least, provides for every single person, and makes both a foundation for a sustainable future-to eventually take the bullet out of the wound and suture it up. (Btw I really appreciate you taking the time to explain your argument.)

Thanks, it's excellent that you remind people that being uncertain about something is not the same as having no clue at all about what will happen

@brendawilliams8062

3 жыл бұрын

Not everyone selling turnips. Fell off a turnip truck. Lol

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

People promoters get huge government grants to push climate change: Follow the money.. This video below cancels out the nonsense of this video. He missed 10 natural causes. kzread.infovideos?&ab_channel=CaliforniaGold Do your own Research, stop being a frightened sheep. ⭐

Great video Neil. I think you articulated the uncertainty and flaws inherent in the scientific process, while kepping it honest and as objective as practically possible. Good job. I look forward to the follow up video you promised ;)

This video is so well written, produced, and presented! Subscribed, liked, and notified!

Good points made, just don't forget that we should scrutinize not only results that are viewed as "pessimistic", but also optimistic ones. Otherwise we open ourselves to the very confirmation bias you've mentioned. People tend to readily scrutinize something they don't like, but accept something pleasing - exactly because they want to *believe*

@og4372

3 жыл бұрын

It may of been helpful if the presentation didn't immediately start with a false equivalence to nutritional studies that are seemingly contradictory. Of course those studies and how the media latches onto them enable the presenter to act as if there was some sort of similar reaction to environmental science thinking on global warming. Quite the opposite, the counter media "like this one" is putting out as much propaganda to cause doubt on us simpletons. What they didn't point out is that all science is debatable and subject to reframing predictions based on better information and testing. It is funny how that is conveniently left out. The presenter also leaves out reasons that distract from his goal of casting doubt, one instance is if the ice is melted from a changed angle of the sun "scientists don't understand why Co2 is released". This isn't true, melting ice exposes green house gases in the melted area like what is happening today in the permafrost zones. Disingenuous at best. He does a good job if one doesn't pay attention to what he is leaving out, or know what he is leaving out. I think he is creating a confirmation bias.

@JohnSmith-ul2ce

3 жыл бұрын

@@og4372 also the graphs are out of context to me. You see a line going straight up and it is 1 degree change. At one point also the sea level is depicted as rising 20 meters at Florida. What would it take for the sea level to rise 20 meters?! How many people would die due to shutting down coal or fossil fuel plants and not having refrigeration, a/c, heat, transportation, etc. we should do things to remove dependence from fossil fuel, but the benefit has to match the penalty. The premise of the video I agree with, be skeptical and question/research everything. ‘The science’ is usually not settled 100% or even close on any of these topics.

@og4372

3 жыл бұрын

@@JohnSmith-ul2ce if you can't trust educated experts, how can you put that trust into those who profit from pessimism? On one side, experts who don't have a profit motive and follow processes that garantee better information will change their testable consensus. On the other side, propagandists who need to spread doubt to protect a greedy industrial sector that hasn't innovated in a century. You should be pessimistic, of all sides, but clearly recognize who is gaining in disinformation and misrepresentation of facts. You have taken a step, but dive in fully in this pessimism, being wary of a source and their motivation. I will add that the industrialization of the solution may not be carbon neutral, the tradeoff to keep the electricity on may just move the emitters to giant machines if they can replicate the output of these dirty plants.

@fishtolizard3930

2 жыл бұрын

Belief Is the Problem.

@JohnSmith-ul2ce

2 жыл бұрын

@@og4372 how do you get all of that from what I said? They have plenty to gain, grants, funding, notoriety, public policy change, power and control. That was not my point though. My point is the changes should be shown on a full scale and the economic impact and loss of human life/quality of life should be taken into account when developing a solution. I think the Earth is warming. I think Humans are partially to blame. I think we are using resources and are not coming up with replacements fast enough. All of the studies I have seen basically say that if we stop all fossil fuel usage completely today, the impact would be negligible on the climate and mass human suffering would ensue. Let’s hope a breakthrough happens soon.

This channel is definitely underrated...

@Xyirua

3 жыл бұрын

Yea

@ThatSB

3 жыл бұрын

He posts 1 video every 3 years. Not really

@murunbuchstanzangur

3 жыл бұрын

@@ThatSB but the quality! the visualisations alone are amazing...

@JustAGuyYaKnow42

3 жыл бұрын

I was going to ask how you can judge that with a grand total of four videos submitted.

@RecklessRusty

3 жыл бұрын

@@JustAGuyYaKnow42 because they watched one (quite amazing video) and commented.

This is a work of art. Congrats Neil.

Well done, your documentaries are very good in the approach and also the visual effects quite nice

It’s felt like a lifetime, but I’m super excited to watch this, Neil! Your work doesn’t go unnoticed my friend 😀 Thank you for all that you do

@billion2626

3 жыл бұрын

Hello there

@BubblingOnion

3 жыл бұрын

Sup checkmark.

@antg1597

3 жыл бұрын

Haha, quick recap: the trailer was released on May 15, 2018. But it's amazing and totally worth the wait.

@giraffeman326

3 жыл бұрын

This is more exiting than the time Bill Wurtz returned

@FinZ_2002

3 жыл бұрын

Litecoin!!!!!!

Thank you for making this. This was beyond expectations, although I've watched your previous works.

@stenbak_5449

3 жыл бұрын

You haven’t made a video in 7 months please come back .

@jeremyashford2145

3 жыл бұрын

Your confirmation bias is showing.

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

People promoters get huge government grants to push climate change: Follow the money.. This video below cancels out the nonsense of this video. He missed 10 natural causes. kzread.infovideos?&ab_channel=CaliforniaGold Do your own Research, stop being a frightened sheep. ⭐

As a biologist who has since had parents fall into QAnon, I crave well-made explanations that can MAYBE rattle their silo. I appreciate the continued tone of skepticism throughout while still kindly and compassionately guiding the viewer to the scientific conclusion. I can see how it would be comforting to a wide range of folks, even if they have limited scientific literacy. Science should not be a dogma.

@NFawc

8 сағат бұрын

Consider your parents for a moment. The 'hockey stick model' tells them that the avg temp every years since the 80s has basically been hotter than the last. And during that period, they've also seen and read countless predictions of floods, starvation and ice caps disappearing, that then have failed to come to be. Is it surprising then if their lived memory which contradicts the narrative suggests to them not to trust the increasing extremism we face on this matter? Add to this the proven issue that work of a more doomsday nature gets more attention and funding than work which paints a less apocalyptic picture... Well... Personally, I think there is climate change akin to what is being suggested, but it's in no way as significant or dangerous as often relentlessly screamed at us in an almost religious fashion.

wow! This is art! I will be spreading it around and watching your future videos. As already mentioned below, I have never seen a presentation with this level of amazing graphics but importantly with the comprehensive, succinct and clear info and explanations so needed now. Thank you!

The quality of these videos is insane, this channel deserves 10 million subs

@unrealisticfiction4182

3 жыл бұрын

you are shooting low my friend

@MrDSimba

3 жыл бұрын

I honestly think that this video should be shown to every person on the planet. Healthy scepticism is absolutely vital for humanity to prosper. As someone who is naturally sceptical, I often find myself questioning certain hypotheses. The problem nowadays is that sceptical individuals are often touted as “conspiracy theorists” for simply stating an alternative hypothesis. Obviously there are some people who take this to the extreme and the problem with these people is that they blur the lines between healthy scepticism and illogical scepticism on the basis of personal beliefs and biases. Objectivity is very rare nowadays and I think far too many people learn something once and then won’t change their beliefs even when more reliable research is presented to them.

@NeilHalloran

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks Dinand! One can dream....

@omilavidanage6608

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrDSimba Totally agree! Everyone should see this!

@bradarmpit3742

3 жыл бұрын

if it was possible to upload videos of this quality daily then he would definitely have well over 10 million subs

This is a masterpiece of balanced, pragmatic and rational journalism Neil. Thank you for creating it. I will share it as widely as I can. Dave

@Graeberwave

3 жыл бұрын

Psychology has been clamoring time and again: we aren’t rational.

@remicaron3191

3 жыл бұрын

I agree but if this turns into a little change to our way of life and magical techno fixes as you have on your channel it will all be for not. We are facing a dilemma which needs a drastic change to every aspect of human existence to stand a chance, and a very small chance at that, of success and techno fixes are just the same old with a twist. Without actual limits on people and consumption which are across the board and fair we will achieve nothing since some people will fight it to the bitter end. One country has to show the world it can be done and the rest will follow suit but without that guiding light we will all fall in the never ending growth and decay we have created. The time for competition is over for the most part. We are now in the time of learning to truly live with what we have and learning to divide what we have equitably so as to calm the people and make them buy in instead of dividing them and destroying us all. I'm talking to us the internet people since we are the ones causing this problem.

@alexandermelbaus2351

3 жыл бұрын

Excellent presentation, but it was not balanced and the information is questionable; at 15:30, the world average temperature has increased by one degree in 65 years. The average temperature around the world has only changed by less then 1 degree since 1898, that to me is extremely stable. 1898 -> 1998; CO2 increased from 295ppm to 367ppm = 72ppm 1998 -> 2015; CO2 increased to 403ppm = 36ppm In 17 years, C02 increased by 50% of the previous 100 years in 1998 with no measurable differences in the data for temperature changes. There is no measurable impact of any kind with the increase of CO2 showing any affect on the temperature. Data from Greenland records the hottest days in the 1930's. Sea level is increasing about 20cm over this period (20th Century) and this increase is similar for the previous 100 years and is quite normal over a further time in history. Professor Ivar Giaever, the 1973 Nobel Prizewinner for Physics [ 2012 meeting of Nobel Laureates - Presentation Video on Global Warming - 30 mins ] [ kzread.info/dash/bejne/hYysqsibZpnAl7A.html ]

@remicaron3191

3 жыл бұрын

@@alexandermelbaus2351 wow. You do understand that a planet doesn’t react instantly to input right? The El Niño/ La Niña effect alone takes the atmosphere 3 to 6 months to change states. So the warming you think we’ve escaped is on its way in the coming decades. The warming we are seeing now is s from the CO2 emissions from anywhere from as far back as the 1980’s to the 2000’s. That’s why everyone will freak out in the next decades when warming goes super sonic and most people are caught off guard. Like I tell people we will be luck to have a well functioning civilization in 2050 and if we continue very lucky to ever get to 2100. This nonsense the news media tells people about how much time we have to change is exactly that nonsense. The Earth is one big ship and like ocean going vessels it takes a long time to change course and when the course changes it also takes a long time to see the changes. So like Biden taking credit for the vaccinations it was actually Trump who set the ball rolling for Biden’s 100 day success. We have very difficult times ahead and no one’s talking about it because they think someone else is working on it. Unfortunately the only thing we can actually do to make the situation better is stop most of the worlds production and no one really wants to do that. Unless we actually get a true leader somewhere in the world which can show the world the way we will slowly go extinct. We need less jobs, less production, less births, less travel and less of everything except equality. And just in case you think I’m communist I’m not saying complete equality but at least food, shelter and clothing for people along with a minimum amount of power. Obviously it has to come from somewhere and yes that will be the richer people in the world but reality makes it the only way to avoid nuclear war. We also will have to start teaching useful things to our kids like organic farming and removing those lawns in the suburbs to turn into gardens and chicken coops. Of course we won’t give up on research and technology but we will have to focus our RnD into more useful avenues instead of what we do now and try to entice people to buy stuff. We will also have to build rail service and transit to have some way of moving people and goods electrically and pretty much ration everything with the money we have changed into carbon credits which everyone would be allotted an equal amount of our very little budget. The rest of things would be back to the barter system and would mainly rely on people being people to each other. As you can probably tell from what I’ve said here I’m not holding my breath for our specie to survive and cities especially large ones may face a very difficult time. Anyway I’m sure the decision makers of the world will have another plan which will promise everyone a great job and more growth and great space colonization around the universe which will be very optimistic and will actually be tried but will only speed our end.

@thomasmoss1066

3 жыл бұрын

@@alexandermelbaus2351 Good Video. Stealing...

Neil, This presentation is far better than I had hoped to see, given the subject matter that you covered. Both the audio and video (sharp graphics) presentation are first rate. At least in my thoughts. The two basic opposite viewpoints on the causes and solutions can give rise to skepticism and frustration, that can be used as justification to keep on keepin’ on while Rome sinks out of sight. Over the years of reading about the various “only real” solutions, one point keeps coming back. Where are all of the millions of displaced people going to go as the salt water creeps under their front doors? Over crowding of the remaining land will likely lead to starvation, disease, riots, and wars, up to and including the “last one”.

visually very pleasing - good work.

Very impressive. I think not only of how much time it took to research and write, but also how long it took to animate.

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

*Climates change is just a super dangerous religious cult - nothing more. No one can debunk the video below - no at all one.* kzread.info/dash/bejne/a6yhtrinlMjOmqQ.html This video is only meant for rational people. If climates change cultists want to see their devil feel free to watch.

@glidercoach

Жыл бұрын

I agree, but he made some critical mistakes. I agreed with pretty much everything in the video until... 15:55 This graph does not match historical news reports. For example: The heat of 1877, 1911, 1921 and 1936. The graph indicates a normal or cool climate during these years. 1877 was the year without winter. It was an unexplained phenomenon that baffled the world. Some did blame sun spots. The summer of 1911 saw 100 people a day dying in New York and 40k people died in Paris from heat. In 1921, millions of people died across Europe and Asia from heat and famine caused by drought. It was also bad all over the world. In 1936 was the dust bowl era in the US where *millions* of real climate refugees fled the Midwest to California to escape the heat. Well documented in the book "The Grapes of Wrath" by Steinbeck. The point in the graph in 1936, is *colder,* than the years the world was freaking out over the coming ice age in the 1970's! This graph does not match historical news reports. NCAR's graph matches the historical news reports. We haven't seen brutal heat waves since the 1930's yet the graph shows a much hotter climate today. He touched on people not believing some science. There's good reason people are sceptical about the many things being told to us. He said "Trust the experts". Like for covid?

@sbecker6133

Жыл бұрын

@@glidercoach facts!

This dude took "quality over quantity" to the next level 1 high-quality and well edited video every few years

@navb0tactual

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you "Adolf Dripler" very cool

@AGMI9

2 жыл бұрын

hahha that name

Absolutely stunning video production - by far the least biased and most informative picture on the subject I’ve seen yet. Well done, sir. Well done. 👍 👍

I only just discovered this channel, and I can't believe I never stumbled upon it before. The quality of the journalism and the video production is really top notch. Thanks so much for your work! As a scientist myself, all I can say is money corrupts everything, and not even humanity's most intrepid pursuers of truth were immune from its poisonous influence. Ultimately, it is the responsibility of everyone to become literate enough in reviewing scientific studies (and examining citations, sources of funding, conflicts of interest, etc.) to restore a semblance of trust in good science and to hold accountable shaky science. Safely bet no network anchor is going to do that for you. Remember, nullius in verba! Take nobody's word for anything, see for yourself! These words guided the great minds of the enlightenment, and we could all stand to gain from re-learning that original tenet. But they'll only be useful if we actually take the time to educate ourselves well enough to judge properly what is plausible and what isn't. Which is also something no pundit or influencer is about to do.

@oldbearnews

Жыл бұрын

yeah - Trust in the "experts" is being build from accurate and observable measurable and timely results which are measured against the predicted models and forecasts. So far none of the 100's predicted events have yet to materialize . . There is still ice caps on the north pole and snow is still falling in middle of USA and the State of Liberty still has dry toes etc. After 70years of study we gone from being in a freezer to being in an oven to we don't really know what it might be - probably a freezer, we just don't know for sure yet (btw - we need more funding to study and enjoy our employment lifestyle) to - - we do know it is your fault for driving a car / eating a cow and enjoying a campfire and so its your doing and you need to change that behavior!

I just clicked on the notification, so I haven't watched through the whole thing yet, but thank you Neil for all your hard work! This is one of the most important messages the world needs to hear

@Hlebuw3k

3 жыл бұрын

hi cary

@TabBuddie

3 жыл бұрын

Yes

@giraffeman326

3 жыл бұрын

This day will go down in history

@Cscuile

3 жыл бұрын

Neil makes some insanely good videos

@NeilHalloran

3 жыл бұрын

Hi Cary! I just checked out your channel. Amazing. I'm familiar with your scale of universe work and am a fan. I'll be checking out your other vids too. I hope you like this one and all its headiness. Thank you!!

Honestly, setting aside the climate issue itself - this is one of the best produced and clear takes on a fundamental problem of the information age: Trust & Authority. It feels as if everyone is under constant pressure to join either of two extremes: total deference to authority, or total distrust of authority. This topic could be explored entirely on it's own, though it was very fitting in this context. Thank for producing this.

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

People get huge government grants to push climate change: Follow the money. This video below cancels out the nonsense of this video. He missed 10 natural causes. kzread.infovideos?&ab_channel=CaliforniaGold

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

People promoters get huge government grants to push climate change: Follow the money... This video below cancels out the nonsense of this video. He missed 10 natural causes. kzread.info/dash/bejne/a6yhtrinlMjOmqQ.html&ab_channel=CaliforniaGold Do your own Research, stop being a frightened sheep. ⭐⭐

@jaspervandenbosch3838

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheConstitutionFirst You're so close, except it's actually fossil fuel corporations that invest huge sums of money in efforts to discredit climate change.

@2partiesnotpreferred226

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheConstitutionFirst yeah what jasper said. You guys have the most to lose you flops.

@Greg-yu4ij

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly. I want to believe what they say about climate change, but when we get these authoritative predictions that we’re going to be underwater in 10 years it is extremely unhelpful and winds up pushing us into opposing camps (which may actually be an unstated goal to drive fundraising). We could start with sea level rises at 3 mm per year, or 3 feet every 100 years and point out that we will soon have the technology to reverse that if we so choose.

What an amazing video, just wow. How this does not have 100 mio views is beyond me

“Defeatist might take comfort in inevitability the way denialist take comfort in uncertainty”. Did you come up with that? Great line!!!!

It is incredibly refreshing to see such an unbiased, pragmatic, fact-driven take on climate change. Amazing work.

@peterjones4180

3 жыл бұрын

Haaaaaaaaaaaa, boy you REALLY do not know much of the science do you.

@R1cardoo

3 жыл бұрын

@@peterjones4180 I bet you don't either

@peterjones4180

3 жыл бұрын

@@R1cardoo You would be WRONG, i know quite a bit about both the scientific results AND the politics of this issue, i have been looking into this for around 44 years. This issue is around 90% politics and 10% science. Remember i lived through the first human induced climate catastrophe promoted by the same groups, (The Club of Rome, the U.N green NGO's etc, and some of the same scientists, James Hanson for example), they proved over time to have been WRONG about every prediction of climate doom they made. Remember they wanted world governments to BUILD AS MANY COAL FIRED POWER STATIONS AS POSSIBLE TO PUMP AS MUCH Co2 INTO THE ATMOSPHERE AS WE COULD TO SAVE THE PLANET, thats RIGHT, thats what they demanded, they demanded we sprinkle the poles with CARBON BLACK TO MELT THE ICE, TO SAVE THE PLANET. These are the same groups that promote panic over Co2 levels and warming, and melting ice now. They have taken perfectly normal short term cycles of warming and cooling and turned them into a mechanism to provide stupendous profits for themselves, and to advance their geopolitical agenda.

@R1cardoo

3 жыл бұрын

@@peterjones4180 the ones that have more to profit about is the big oil companies and the northern countries, this issue is political because of those big oil companies giving money to politicians to push their agenda.

@peterjones4180

3 жыл бұрын

@@R1cardoo Ok, boy you do NOT have much of a handle on the realities , it was the owners of STANDARD OIL, that started and funded the environmental panic , that is the Rockefeller family, through one of the organizations they set up ,and fund for that purpose, via the Rockefeller Foundation, The Club of Rome, it was The Club of Rome which set up the U.N environmental department and the IPCC, The Club of Rome is the IPCC's primary environmental advisors, they exist (like the CFR and the Trilaterals) to implement the geopolitical agenda of the Rockefellers and other members of the group. Fossil Fuel companies have ALWAYS been one of the LARGEST funders of the global warming panic movement, the commonly repeated lie is that oil companies give VAST amounts of money to global warming realist groups, that is simply NOT TRUE, a small amount of funding does go to those groups but the vast river of corporate and government funding goes to green groups. The world will still buy all the oil it can and the pretty useless solar and wind sector provides the opportunity for even greater profits via investment by subsidiary companies, these profits are ONLY available from the vast subsidies provided by YOU in your taxes, in contrast to the much smaller subsidies provided as tax breaks for fossil fuel. I suggest you invest the money in a copy of Cloak of Green by Elaine Dewar..........she is a greenie and an AGW true believer but an honest journalist, her association with environmental causes provided her with an inside look at what REALLY was going on inside WWF and other green NGO's, what she saw shocked her, and prompted her to start researching that sector, her professional relationships gave her entry to the closed door meetings at the 1992 Rio Earth Conference which was organized by Maurice Strong an oil executive, white collar criminal, and like Henry Kissinger a lifetime servant of the house of Rockefeller (it was the Rockefellers who made their careers for them through the CFR), the Rio conference was conducted to get the governments of the world to sign up to Agenda 21, which is a mechanism to implement the Rockefeller geopolitical agenda using aspects of environmentalism as a lever to compel electoral support in western countries. You cannot understand the politics behind the global warming issue without a working understanding of the activities of the worlds most powerful capitalists over the last 120 years. The ACTUAL history of that period is VERY different to what we have all been led to believe. There is at least one U Tube interview with Elaine Dewar on U Tube.

as my tech school instructors would tell me, "if you weren't sure why didn't you ask for help" upon flopping on a test. problem is, I was sure. but I was also wrong.

They're so sure of their predictions most of them have waterfront homes in Sydney, Australia

It is absolutely terrifying that we are more or less doing nothing to change the course we are on. Let’s say we were *only* 50% sure that our current trajectory could lead to 4-5 degree warming over 200 years - arguing that we should do *nothing* preemptively, as a species - is an insane gamble. We think in short, tiny terms. But even just a few generations beyond our own children will encompass hundreds of years of human experience. Beyond that, think how utterly atomizing and depressing it would be to know there is even just a reasonable chance that most humans inhabit an unloveable plant in just 1,000, or even 5,000 more years. The data, surely, shows we face much more than 50/50 odds of looking at dangerous, planet-level warming due to C02 emissions on a rapid scale (rapid, in this case, refers to the historical scale we are talking here). Almost every other issue of popular debate seems utterly inconsequential compared to this topic. This topic encompasses all of humanity - for hundreds and thousands of years. Billions of children, men and women. Again… if you knew there was even just a 10% (one in every ten tries) that the planet would warm to a devastating degree within even a few hundred years, you would arguably be insane to claim we should do *nothing* to rectify the situation. With the data, analysis and information we currently have, it is downright terrifying we cannot even muster the public will to make *any* systemic changes to our current course. Half of America is championing government-level bans of even investing strategies by private companies that take environmental harm into account, simply because of a fomented outrage against the *idea* of climate change. Even so-called, self-ascribed, true believers in climate change (*cough*, democrats) are moving at a glacial pace to address the topic in any meaningful way. The other party is outright opposed to doing *anything* - and this is in the most powerful country on the planet in question, here. Imagine you are an alien 20,000,000 years from now descending on Earth as part of a historical study of extraterrestrial life and civilization. You find deeply buried ruins and evidence of human culture from 2300 AD - writings describing the total collapse and extinction of the human race due to accelerated climate change, and you eventually find digital records of the debate in the 2020s about whether climate change even was a thing. You, the alien investigator, learns that a civilization was willing to do *nothing*, or almost nothing, in the face of a very serious threat to its survival on a relatively short scale (hundreds of years). You learn that as data poured in, those with wealth and power tied to a current way of doing things vehemently sought to destroy all efforts to change the current course, to avoid calamity, and that those efforts won out. You learn that millions of regular people submitted to a denialism of an objectively serious threat to the civilization out of petty (in retrospect) political differences. You learn that humanity had evidence, for decades, that it was on a fast track to destruction and ignored it, decided to do nothing, out of “political disagreements” over issues as banal as what pronouns people used to identify themselves, etc. That’s a sad, hypothetical reality. I am not *sure* of anything, and this video is a fantastic example of why we should be * less sure of our views in general. However, the topic of climate change, to me, has almost nothing to do with being *sure.* Lets say C02 emissions due to human activity had just a 10% chance of drastically ramping up the temperature to the point of potential societal collapse. We would be absolutely insane not to take drastic action, *even in that scenario.* if you disagree, would you take a hypothetical 10-shot revolver, load one round, and voluntarily stick it to your head and pull the trigger? Hell. No. Literally no one but a deranged, suicidal person would. And that is obvious. If you believe there is even a 10% chance that, more or less, the entire scientific community is right about this, and yet you vote for, and support, elected officials and companies committed to doing *nothing* to mitigate climate change (and who are outright actively working to oppose any and all policy changes surrounding this issue), you’re voluntarily taking that hypothetical 10-shot revolver and putting it to the head of yourself and all your family’s future descendants. For what? Imagine that climate change denialism wins out, and ultimately they are wrong - the stakes are unimaginably high. Isn’t the sane, reasonable course to err on the side of caution here?

@lanereese9303

Жыл бұрын

Bought the BS hook line and sinker didn't you. Look at a real graph of the last 250 million years and see how luky we really are.

@lanereese9303

Жыл бұрын

Conrad i can tell you are a thinker 👍 14,000 + or - a little we had up to 2 miles thick of ice on the northern part of the US. We have been in global warming ever since and that is a good thing. More CO2 = more green =more food. 1" of sea level rise in the last 100 years is not as catastrophic as the hysteria is putting out there. About 12,900 years ago see levels came up 420 feet and people had to adjust and move. There was an extinction event of not only the mega fauna but the Clovis people also. Some how humanity found its way. So will we adapt. Volcanism and impacts and prosession and solar weather will always dictate the big picture no matter what we do. I still say a greenhouse is a much better place to live than a younger dryas waistland.

@lanereese9303

Жыл бұрын

You speak of the entire scientific community agrees with you? Just the ones that receive millions and are highly invested in making misleading heavily manipulated data and graphs and defund and cancel the rest of the scientific community . CO2 is plant food hence green house = more photosynthesis = more food = more biological life= more places for it to flourish. It is the very political propaganda you preach against that you have swallowed. I am not saying let's all go burn every bit of Styrofoam we can find and dump all of our spent oils in the ocean. I just think that this show and opinions like yours are deeply flawed. Speak the popiganda long and loud enough it becomes the truth to a lot of people. Think for yourself. Just curious why are you so worried about what happens in 5 to 10 thousand years? Your grandchildrens grandchildrens grandchildren will be long dead. At that point i really don't care. All things will eventually decend into chaos it is the law of entropy - thermodynamics.

@lucca3113

11 ай бұрын

​@@lanereese9303 you are incorrect. "CO2 = more green = more food" is a gross oversimplification of the facts. you are thinking about it in terms of short-term gains. take say a change of .3 degrees global average temperature from now. areas which are already infertile will conduct heat waves and as such won't produce any number higher of crops and food, only other sectors. this is highly dependent on the climate, biome and forestation of the area *prior* to the change. climate change will not magically create more forests in places where there aren't any, and would be devastating for most regions on the world. this prediction assumes that not only will humans control climate change in time, but that also the global average temperature remains at a tendency to lower, which it does not. however think about the long-term. a change of three whole degrees is enough to place vast agricultural sectors underwater, and decimate entire populations already living under heat waves. humans don't need 'more food more green'. we have specialized technologies which have allowed us to well overproduce many times that of the global necessity, and were it up to us we'd deforest proportionally the same amount. again, this is the problem with modern science communication. everybody is a scientist and believes they are entitled to everything they talk about. but you aren't a scientist, and you don't understand it. for instance, you also present a misconception in regards to thermodynamics and entropy. this is a concept in physics, a subject matter detached from the soft sciences that are being discussed here.

@UltimateUnknown

10 ай бұрын

This is largely the way I have thought of the issue and you put in very succinctly. Not doing anything in regards to the climate issue (irrespective of what you believe is causing it to change so rapidly), even if you think there is only a very small chance of it being catastrophic for our species (as well as many others currently out there) is the equivalent of playing Russian roulette with much of humanity. The stakes if you get it wrong are on an unfathomable level.

One of the biggest issues we have in society is the inability to question the science without being shut down or dismissed as a science denier. If no one questions the science, the flaws will be taught as the truth, and that will lead to very bad situations occurring. Dissent of mainstream opinion shouldn't be a crime.

@quinnalmeida4043

3 жыл бұрын

Science is the process of figuring out the truth. Any scientific argument should be considered as a placeholder theory. Using the scientific method to continually improve or replace these theories is what humans do, and should do, to get as close as possible to the truth. Any attempt to disprove something should be taken with absolute seriousness. The people accusing others of being science deniers for no reason other that personal bias don't represent the scientific community in the slightest. However, I will say that there is a difference in attempting to disprove a prevailing theory and just not wanting to believe it because you don't like it.

@matthewledford7209

3 жыл бұрын

@@quinnalmeida4043 I agree

@curtisk2286

3 жыл бұрын

That's right

@Timbo_tango

3 жыл бұрын

Are you going to include not getting vacinations?

@deshaungreene6597

3 жыл бұрын

As we thought back in the 80’s that all fats in foods were bad due to the rise in obesity. 40 years later we know it is the rise of sugar intake . But it takes trial and error in science. Good point there. Spot on.

amazing sound design in this and editing. subbed for sure! Love the idea of being a skeptic. More of us need to question everything or we become complacent.

@8UTT0NMASH3RS

3 жыл бұрын

Oh hi Phly you were watching too huh? I'm about to share this video to people everywhere.

@mexicanbanjo9325

3 жыл бұрын

Questioning everything is important or else civilization wouldn’t be able to move forward if we just sat back and let fate takes its course.

@MaxLohMusic

3 жыл бұрын

A rant to no one in particular: Some people have lost touch with what it means to be a skeptic. They just think it means distrust everything one side says and believe everything their side says. Distrust the experts and media if so inclined, but don't put blind faith in your preferred websites/channels while pretending it isn't another form of "media". Ignore all that; look mainly at the studies and metastudies themselves. If there's anything with more credibility than media, experts and scientists, it's science itself. The most flagrant violators of this concept are the people who call everyone "sheep", who ironically are the biggest "sheep" themselves. However, don't think you're immune from bias just because you're not one of those people. When "mainstream media" touted that masks are useless against diseases in 2020, most liberals were completely on board with it and none of my friends believed me when I said it was contradictory to scientific studies that went all the way back to 2012.

@markhutton6055

3 жыл бұрын

@@MaxLohMusic show me a study that proves masks work. There are none. Most say that there is no proof they do, though accept that more work needs to be done. Some say that, particularly cloth mask, can increase the spread of infection. Most studies also involved health workers, very few pre-pandemic studies involved the general public. Health workers are trained in the use of masks, change them regularly and have in house laundry services (that was the subject of a study in itself - a study which showed that when health care workers washed cloth masks themselves at home, the masks increased the rate of infection rather than reducing it). A court case in Ontario, between healthcare workers and the hospital, determined from the BOK that there was no evidence that masks reduced the spread of infection. And though the CDC, the NHS and PHE are s always mentioning (but not referencing) studies which prove that masks do not cause hypoxia, the pre-pandemic study by Bader seemed to have proved the opposite. Still the largest study done todate, the Danish study, failed to conclude that masks prevented the spread of infection, stating that there was no evidence that masks work. This coupled with observational data from masked and maskless states (or even counties - such as in Arizona), there us nothing that can be shown to prove that masks work. The only way to prove a negative (normally) is to continue to fail to prove the positive.

@thejediknight203

3 жыл бұрын

Hey Phly 👋 Long range yeets are a cure for everything 😂🤣😂

Well done presentation. It would be intersting to see a plot of the carbon levels vs the temperatures over time.

@QT5656

7 ай бұрын

You also need to take account of the Sun. Although solar output is relatively similar on 10 to 100 year times scales, 100s of millions of years ago it was significantly less powerful. That's why global temperatures were only a few degrees higher with much greater CO2 concentrations. Ceist8 has lots of good tweets on this topic which link to the primary scientific literature. e.g. - Lacis, A.A., Schmidt, G.A., Rind, D. and Ruedy, R.A., 2010. Atmospheric CO2: Principal control knob governing Earth’s temperature. Science, 330(6002), pp.356-359.

Fantastic graphics - thanks.

This goes way beyond climate science and you bring up very important issues with research as a whole, it's awesome

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

People get huge government grants to push climate change: Follow the money. This video below cancels out the nonsense of this video. He missed 10 natural causes. kzread.infovideos?&ab_channel=CaliforniaGold

@TheAmbasador99

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheConstitutionFirst I am afraid that you are part of the issue as everybody else, me even replying to you also underlines my role into the complex nature of this problem. It's very easy, we do have an effect on the delicate natural balance this planet has, anthropogenic causes for climate change are very well recorded, I just don't like and I don't believe in climate doomerism. I have an interest in Astronomy, and I can tell you that cyclic burst of sunspots do affect the climate of our planet, rather minimally, temperatures have been on an upward trend since the industrial revolution. However, I am less interested in geology, but happen to know that CO2 emissions from Volcanoes emit about the same emissions as humans... For just a few hours/days. We've been making emissions for 271 years and disturbing the natural process of climate change and we aren't stopping any time soon, better yet, rates of emission are increasing. It's easy to get confused and thinking you are onto something, is easy to see scientists change their minds according to the data they gathered and think that they are simply not being cosistent. Science isn't consistent, if it were, we would have no need to figure out how the world works. And then there are the journalists who have to add onto this confusion: global warming and climate change as terms had always existed in tandem it's just that the frequency of use changed on the basis of sensationalism, and global cooling feel into disfavor as evidence hinted that it wasn't the case.

@TheAmbasador99

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheConstitutionFirst there is no (let alone) climate researcher who got rich from doing their job, indeed, as a researcher you are lucky if you are better off than a cubicule slave in terms of earnings

@elizabethwinsor5140

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheConstitutionFirst thanks for the alternative view point! 😊

@ex8280

2 жыл бұрын

@@elizabethwinsor5140 in their useless occupation, having a paycheck is probably reason enough to question their studies.

This is one of the best documentaries I have seen in a long time and so many more people need to see it

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

People promoters get huge government grants to push climate change: Follow the money.. This video below cancels out the nonsense of this video. He missed 10 natural causes. kzread.infovideos?&ab_channel=CaliforniaGold

@ryancohen6479

11 ай бұрын

tldr?

Great video, Neil!

Great video !!

"People who aren't called scientists kinda havta be scientists." 7:07 A hundred times yes! I say this a lot as a science communicator/teacher, that we are teaching science thinking and science skills to students in order to later have citizens who think like scientists.

@luddity

3 жыл бұрын

Knowledge is power, and too much power in too few hands is never a good thing. Therefore, scientific knowledge should be as widely distributed as possible, in order to protect and preserve the quality of scientific knowledge and its progress thru time.

@MaxLohMusic

3 жыл бұрын

I hope your vision of education becomes more widespread, because otherwise our world is doomed. Some tech leaders think they can just censor wrong information to reduce the harm, but the internet is proof of how easily that backfires and just fuels more conspiracy theories, not to mention they'll inevitably censor something that's true once in a while. The censoring is like a bandaid covering up the symptoms. Educating more young people to understand how/why science works, how real-life empirical evidence is way more reliable than an expert's prediction, and how to be wary of common statistical fallacies; that's the cure.

@danpress7745

3 жыл бұрын

And, thinking like a scientist means citing sources. I noticed within a few minutes that the author did not cite sources. Just made vague claims to certain sources. HMMMMM, gotta wonder.

@danpress7745

3 жыл бұрын

@@leydensjar Silly or not, not giving sources is reflective of the author's bias. I'm not a true scientist, I'm an engineer, so science facts are important to me. So, again, I've gotta wonder what the author's motives are.

@danpress7745

3 жыл бұрын

@@leydensjar What fake account?

I feel guilty watching this documentary for free, they used to charge me something with this kind of quality back then.

@xenvox724

3 жыл бұрын

@@sykocode8530 He’s just in awe at the quality of the content, which even paid documentaries can’t match.

@EVIL9000

3 жыл бұрын

@@sykocode8530 easy there tiger, he is merely complementing the work.

@pauleohl

3 жыл бұрын

@@EVIL9000 You have inadvertently created an exquisite play on compliment/complement.

@EVIL9000

3 жыл бұрын

@@pauleohl English not being my main language 😅

@DoctorTauri

3 жыл бұрын

Then pay him?

Well done and beautiful presentation.

Ok this ia getting beyond pedagogy and KZread... this is a new form of art. Congrats

This guy’s editing is on whole different level

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

People get huge government grants to push climate change: Follow the money. This video below cancels out the nonsense of this video. He missed 10 natural causes. kzread.infovideos?&ab_channel=CaliforniaGold

@Frickolas

2 жыл бұрын

God I wish the dislike button still worked.

@Khang-kw6od

2 жыл бұрын

@@Frickolas ?

@Frickolas

2 жыл бұрын

@@Khang-kw6od there was some dude saying it was just stock graphics. looks like he deleted his comment.

@Khang-kw6od

2 жыл бұрын

@@Frickolas oh lol

When we needed him the most, he came back

@alexloftus8892

3 жыл бұрын

The Last Videobender

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

People promoters get huge government grants to push climate change: Follow the money.. This video below cancels out the nonsense of this video. He missed 10 natural causes. kzread.infovideos?&ab_channel=CaliforniaGold Do your own Research, stop being a frightened sheep. ⭐⭐

thanks a lot for this video. was super informative!

Inspiring, made me think about analysis itself in ways I never considered

One should never feel guilty for questioning and scrutinizing anything, even the status quo, this is how science is done. The only sacred truth in science is that there are no sacred truths - Carl Sagan.

@sirgeorgethegoat1748

3 жыл бұрын

Well said! Toddlers are smarter than is all they question everything

@bowez9

3 жыл бұрын

Unless you're posting against the status quo, then you're labeled a heretic.

@Zenkka

3 жыл бұрын

The problem isn’t questioning and scrutinizing the science but the flat out denial of science by swarms of people who can barely understand the basics…. Because they don’t like what they are hearing

@legendarybroliz4578

3 жыл бұрын

@@Zenkka that is true, you make a fair point, it's sad that some people will never accept the evidence even if it is spelled out clearly for them.

@CrusaderSports250

3 жыл бұрын

@Nihal a non believer, always had a problem when they claim the science is settled, maybe it is but maybe it isn't, throughout history there have been claims about the science being settled only to be proved wrong, discovery and invention have been driven by challenging the held view, the whole idea of collecting wild animals and looking after them was just madness, and the hunters Union is up in arms as it will take jobs, animals are wild and we hunt them that is how society works end of argument, science should never be viewed as settled, even when it appears to be right.

You can say whatever you want this video and it’s subject, it looks absolutely gorgeous, one of the most beautiful KZread videos I’ve ever seen, and this is what so many channels should be putting out.

@Timbo_tango

3 жыл бұрын

Just remeber beauty can be deceptive also. Facts are often not beautiful but hard to find.

@ewallt

3 жыл бұрын

@@Timbo_tango It’s a bit ironic that a number of the “truths” or “errors” listed in the video are dependent upon “experts.”

@Timbo_tango

3 жыл бұрын

@@ewallt Yep, very.

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

*Since Neil is uncertain* *This video shows the natural forms of carbon emissions and the logical ways to a cleaner environment.* kzread.info/dash/bejne/p6ptm5iJfaXclM4.html

Everything from the graphics to the data presentation to the well documented source deserves a solid 5 star. Superb! I only wish there were more videos like this.

If people dont understand what inevitable climate change is, they won't be afraid enough to change their behaviour. If they dont know how close we are to possible irreversible trends they wont see we have to start asap We, as in the world!!!!

I felt a little pessimistic when I first laid my eyes on this video because of what I assumed it contents would proceed into arguing against human caused climate change but this video is a work of art, it encapsulates the essence of science and informs the viewer unbiasedly with such a wonderful use of animation and narration. Reminds me of Derek Miller's ideology that videos are the best way to educate the general public about science.

@0x2404

3 жыл бұрын

Maybe now in the future you will judge less on headlines. Even if it argued against human caused climate change, you shouldn't automatically dismiss it without knowing the contents.

@aperson2703

3 жыл бұрын

Literal definition of confirmation bias.

@smiffythecat3751

3 жыл бұрын

A lot of us are old enough to see the "trends" of what we are told is science. It seems about every 20 years (sometimes 40, sometimes less than 10) the trends change. 20 years is a de(s)cent average to look for an oligarchical truth change {note: not an actual truth change}. And yeah, he did a fairly good job!

@efhi

3 жыл бұрын

@@0x2404 Yes, I always try to. That's why I watched it regardless

@efhi

3 жыл бұрын

@@aperson2703 I mean I watched the video regardless of my preconceptions and I read quite a bit of the arguments of people who support that notion. Regardless I don't doubt that humans had a big impact on it and the average populace would take those kind of ideas as an excuse to dismiss anything else.

Every dimension of this was near perfect. Vocal delivery, thoroughness of research, precision of language, animation, mood, pacing, and above all the right mindset and intention behind the composition of the message. Flawless.

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

People get huge government grants to push climate change: Follow the money.. This video below cancels out the nonsense of this video. He missed 10 natural causes. kzread.infovideos?&ab_channel=CaliforniaGold

@ModelLights

2 жыл бұрын

'Every dimension of this was near perfect. Vocal delivery, thoroughness of research, precision of language, animation, mood, pacing, and above all the right mindset and intention behind the composition of the message. Flawless.' You realize this is hilarious, and you should be embarrassed to have said it, right? 'Fluff makes the science better!' No, it does not. 'right mindset and intention, mood, pacing' Ridiculous crap. Only one thing actually counts in science, and that is what is actually correct and accurate. That you even consider anything else as a factor is silly. There's a reason the people who push climate change take the money and have to cheat the data everywhere they can.

@jioshfiouwhegfoiwe

2 жыл бұрын

@@ModelLights Are you denying climate change?

@lizicadumitru9683

2 жыл бұрын

@@ModelLights OK, sidestep all the "glitz"...was the data correct or was it fudged?

@ModelLights

2 жыл бұрын

@@lizicadumitru9683 '...was the data correct or was it fudged?' Logic faults all over the place, doesn't even make it to 'the data'.

800, 000 years ago, was the last time the planet had todays CO2 levels.

One thing I do not think he fully addresses is how the funding and money affects publications. If you are taking money from a big pharma, chances are your results to be published are not going to denounce a product they are selling as it will not get published. The same is for the oil companies and lobbyists that put pressures on science research and policy makers to ignore sound scientific research.

@klokoloko2114

3 жыл бұрын

like fossil fuel money lobbyist

@LabGecko

2 жыл бұрын

@@BishopRealTalk98 So intergovernmental = scientific communities in different nations, yes? Please explain to me how to coordinate and pay said scientists, accountants, clerks, and other governmental agents to stay quiet uniformly over decades. I'd like to use that method to start a mad scientist cabal.

@nnzzp8330

2 жыл бұрын

@@LabGecko They don't stay quiet; they're blackballed and dismissed by the scientific establishment. Think the green energy lobby isn't putting money into funding these studies? How about the (overwhelmingly left-wing) universities deciding which studies get funding (with the end result already in mind)? Scientists know which side of their bread is buttered on and those who think the only deceitful influence is coming from the oil companies is naive.

@LabGecko

2 жыл бұрын

@@nnzzp8330 I'll ask again, how do you keep terms of thousands of people from speaking out against such treatment like you claim to be doing right now? How do you keep them from sharing proof this is happening?

@LabGecko

2 жыл бұрын

@@BishopRealTalk98 Listen, I understand your point of view. I used to think the same thing regarding climate change. But it just isn't true. There are scientists that have been bought off, yes. But they are FAR from the majority. I don't know where you are getting your information, but the guy that made this video did some good research. He actually went and talked to a bunch of the scientists and reviewed research on the others that he didn't talk to. I changed my mind when I was presented with those facts too. I recommend you search farther. It isn't easy, I grant you, but it is worth it to know you are telling people the truth.

I have noticed that the more certain someone is about a "soft" fact, like the future, the more likely they are to have blindered their view to comfort their own assumptions. Being aware of uncertainty lets us look at experts with more of a detached perspective. That very uncertainty helps us find more reasonable answers. Maybe not "The Correct" answer of this day, but one we were unable to see from our own certainty. Just remember every solution changes the ratio of "good" answers to "bad" answers, which moves some solutions from one side to the other.

@jbdelphiaiii7637

2 жыл бұрын

My guess is that AI expert systems might be able to remove some of our human biases. Climate prediction, modelling and control is a driving force for supercomputers. Then another problem might emerge - as in who decides exactly what the climate should be once we can eventually control it.

@soscilogical1904

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, people believe scientists at the hospital for babies and anaesthetics, chemistry is fine. When they want electricity in a microchip, scientists aare your freind. When they want to put saudi oil in the tank, Scientists and chemists are fake and wrong! When they need Smartphone Antenna, SCIENTIST FRIEND! need pollute sky? Scientist ENEMY! Please be reasonable. please don't be a troll with fake allegiance to chemistry when it suits you to pollute your kid's sky, especially if you don't really know what the sun is made of or how they measure sun chemicals in the 1800s.

@spencerstevens2175

Жыл бұрын

It's always very convenient for people's arguments when the consequences for what they are claiming will happen won't happen in their lifetime

@spencerstevens2175

Жыл бұрын

​@@jbdelphiaiii7637 it will take so long to achieve that we won't even be recognized as humans by that point

@N3gr0bitch

Жыл бұрын

Scientists are just as sure about their climate change as they are about of Santa Claus. They're not sure, but they're working on it. They want presents, but they are not sure how to feel about a white man in a beard. They rather inprison him, but then again, will they get any presents then?

just beautiful production!!!!

@the_unstoppable_doge8078

Жыл бұрын

mooo

It's not that their sure or unsure, theyre being totally misrepresented by the media and politics

It angers me that stupid videos on KZread blow up but masterpieces like these don’t get attention!!! It’s probably one of the most outstanding, insightful, rational, informing and unbiased documentaries I’ve seen! Please, KZread algorithm, do your magic!!!

@laurensjvg

3 жыл бұрын

Last few minutes are not unbiased

@andymacdonald821

3 жыл бұрын

Kevin, the end credits clearly show that their are dozens of globalist benefactors paying off this pseudoscience yet only two "research analysts". This video is just a slick heavily biased advert for the CarbonTaxFraud SCAM. I smell a u.n./ipcc shill.....

@crinolynneendymion8755

3 жыл бұрын

@@andymacdonald821 Rubbish; you just fed this video into your hardened rut of logic and threw in the irrelevant word "pseudscience". There's nothing "science" about this video, it's about "thinking". And you failed. As for your nose? Now that's a scientific instrument I'm sure we can rely on...

@benm3382

3 жыл бұрын

That always annoys me too, but I guess the thing to remember is that an amazing video takes time and effort to appreciate while a dumb video can be consumed passively by anyone... So the best videos are always going to have less views. But they got high-quality engagement, which can be very good for sponsorships and ad revenue.

@noctyd9322

3 жыл бұрын

This video has almost 400k views and 5.6k comments including veritasium and it's only been around about a month.

Absolutely brilliant! As a follower and occasional editor at Skeptical Science, this is truly a great tool.

@peterjones4180

3 жыл бұрын

Of course some one who works at Skeptical Science would LOVE this highly deceitful bit of propaganda. After all John Cook cant seem to tell the difference between 97% and 0.3% in HIS OWN PUBLISHED AND HIGHLY FLAWED STUDY.

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

*Since Neil is uncertain* *This video shows the natural forms of carbon emissions and the logical ways to a cleaner environment.* kzread.info/dash/bejne/p6ptm5iJfaXclM4.html

Your report is of pure excellence...

I like these moving pictures and the voice is calm

This was beautifully made, thank you so much for creating and sharing this with us!

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

People get huge government grants to push climate change: Follow the money. This video below cancels out the nonsense of this video. He missed 10 natural causes. kzread.infovideos?&ab_channel=CaliforniaGold

This video is beautiful. Not only does it explain the issue thoroughly, it also presents it in away that someone can only describe as "art". I think this should be shown to everyone in the whole world. Honestly the music made me feel like I was watching a scene from Sunday In The Park With George, or another Sondheim work.

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

People promoters get huge government grants to push climate change: Follow the money... This video below cancels out the nonsense of this video. He missed 10 natural causes. kzread.infovideos?&ab_channel=CaliforniaGold Do your own Research, stop being a frightened sheep. ⭐⭐

The studies often times say an entirely different thing than the media reports. The media will read a summary or read a short amount of the study and not actually get the takeaway. Heck sometimes they conclude the exact opposite that the study data shows, like when reporters claimed a study in the 70s showed that we were headed into an ice age, when the study said the exact opposite (and were seeing was correct.)

The uncertainty about global warming means that doing nothing might not be so bad. Or it might be worse than we expect. I don’t think we should play Russian roulette with the climate. Reducing future economic growth from 2.5% per year to 1.5% to fight global warming seems like a good idea to me.

This was awesome. Ive never seen anyone visualize and illustrate uncertainty and the nuances or data so well on graphs. I really wish illustrating uncertainty like you did and disproving the average line into the lines or all the sources was more common. It makes it so much easier to understand stuff well. Good job. Thx.

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

*Since Neil is uncertain..* *This video shows the natural forms of carbon emissions and the logical ways to a cleaner environment.* kzread.info/dash/bejne/p6ptm5iJfaXclM4.html

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

*Since Neil is uncertain..* *This video shows the natural forms of carbon emissions and the logical ways to a cleaner environment.* kzread.info/dash/bejne/p6ptm5iJfaXclM4.html

it's important to find out who funded a study when considering its information.

@johnryan1287

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly. Who funds the study determines the conclusions. Nothing from the climate alarmists should be believed

@prussianowl233

2 жыл бұрын

@@johnryan1287 Who's funding the studies that point to global warming then?

@johnryan1287

2 жыл бұрын

@@prussianowl233 The UN, Bill Gates. Al Gore. A wide array of progressive think tanks and super pacs. Duh

@phr3ui559

2 жыл бұрын

PrussianOwl23 cope

@prussianowl233

2 жыл бұрын

@@phr3ui559 ?

I like to click on this video if only to rewatch the ending. Absolutely amazing

I like how it leaves on a hopeful note.

I know this will get lost in the swarm of comments, but I love your work and the way you display it. Thanks for another beautiful documentary

Dude, I'm so glad I clicked on this video. You did such a great job putting this together. I was amazed by everything from your analytical skills, your music choice, and the graphics. Subscribed! :)

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

People promoters get huge government grants to push climate change: Follow the money.. This video below cancels out the nonsense of this video. He missed 10 natural causes. kzread.infovideos?&ab_channel=CaliforniaGold

Dope Video! Fantastic.

We're currently in the middle of an Ice Age. The Earth has experienced five major ice ages and this one is called the Quaternary. It has been characterized by alternating periods of glaciation averaging 70,000-90,000 years and interglacial warming periods of 10,000-30,000 years. There have been approximately a dozen epochs of glaciation interspersed with interglacials over the last million years. Our current interglacial, the Holocene epoch, began about 12,000 years ago. At the peak of the last glaciation, about 18,000 years ago, there were ice caps and glaciers over two miles high covering Detroit and much of North America, Europe, and the southern parts of South America and Africa.

holy moly, the quality of this video was unexpected! Great Job!

Journalist: "Journalists need to take responsibility for what they report" No-one really: :O

@joeschmoe4205

3 жыл бұрын

What does it mean to take responsibility? I've never known what that word signifies. It's an honest question.

@johnmcclain3887

3 жыл бұрын

When a real "scientist" publishes his or her work, they must make full attributions, delineate the articles they researched, and put all their findings in factual, accurate data, annotated. It's ridiculous to make this claim, while the actual increase "since we've been measuring it", remember, two hundred years ago, we'd not identified most of the elements. It's a simple fact, going from 200 parts per billion, to almost three hundred, is a 45% increase, but has no meaning without context. At sixty three, I've seen statements of five, six, or twelve inches of "ocean rise" while knowing it hasn't risen enough to see, living on the ocean, in wetlands, and having spent two decades around the world as a Marine. I hate journalists who simply fail to provide any factual evidence, using innuendo, to garner attention, and scare the public. I can't believe how many have watched this and think its science. Semper Fidelis,

@randomuser5443

3 жыл бұрын

They think they guild thought instead of i forming

@OneTrippin

3 жыл бұрын

Few journalists report news. They write stories now days. I.e. narritive structures. Peer reviewed studies can be just as influanced as the people that produce them. The story tellers often just pick and choose what facts or data they need to best fit their narritive structure.

2 years later it looks like they were pretty accurate

200 years from now, whether our understanding of Climate Change is legitimate or not. Our future brethren will either agree, establish new areas, or snark at the ideas we have today.

@surfingbilly9654

Жыл бұрын

the same way we look at the things people believed 200 years ago is the same way people 200 years in the future are going to look at us.

@thomaskositzki9424

22 күн бұрын

Ummm, if our ancestors are able to write and read anyway. The true problem with Climate Change isn't the millions or billions of death that will likely occur due to ecosystems collapsing and food production plummeting because of it. It is the political instability it will cause and the 15.000 nuclear warheads still in existence. Chances are, they will be fired once the chaos and despair on Earth will be great enough. If humanity survives that (questionable) it is very likely the survivors will be thrown back to the stone age because educational systems will be non-existent and the struggel for survival will take up all energy.

I need more from ya brotha. The world does. Being able to confidently put this into the perspective between multiple view points of a society and rally them together in a conclusion that the world does in fact need change, is amazing.

Alternate title: Journalist Realizes He Has to Question Things Before Reporting Them

@normanstewart7130

3 жыл бұрын

You're right, and the tragedy is that most journalists aren't even aware that they need to question science.

@17cmmittlererminenwerfer81

3 жыл бұрын

Best comment. For today's "journalists", just stepping out of their cultural echo-chamber is the most liberating experience of their short lives.

Grate presentation. Thank you.

The only thing this clip shows is how unable we are in dealing with these issues. The fact is, that there is a change coming and there is nothing we can do, even if we want to. Simply to late - we learn only the hard way, so it seems.

@TypdersichderTypnenn

9 ай бұрын

It's never "too late" so long as there are humans left to care for. Or rather, it depends on what your goal is. If your goal is "nothing changes", then yes it is too late. If your goal is "create and maintain a world stable enough for all humans to live a decent life on" then no, it's not too late. Our history is proof that things move very slowly for long periods of time, and then they move very rapidly over short periods of time. Political change that comes "early" enough to prevent climate change from destroying our civilization may yet come; but it will not come in the form of the election of just another candidate or political party within the system. Rather it will come from the collapse of our political system and the emergence of a new one. When and how this happens and what the replacement looks like is yet to be determined - and it depends on all of us to make decisions.

@elingrome5853

28 күн бұрын

we're more than capable of dealing with these issues! we build dams, irrigation, we moved Chicago 170 years ago! Climate deaths are falling rapidly...

@festermann

27 күн бұрын

@@elingrome5853 i am afraid its bigger!

4 years 4 videos 4 masterpieces

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

People promoters get huge government grants to push climate change: Follow the money.. This video below cancels out the nonsense of this video. He missed 10 natural causes. kzread.infovideos?&ab_channel=CaliforniaGold

This video doesn't just present an argument that's rationally sound, it's also presented in a really creative and artistic way. I reckon the ability to think both analytically and creatively/artistically is really difficult, but you've pulled it off with flying colours. Well done mate.

@douglassmithe9799

2 жыл бұрын

@@waynemyers2469 I mean if you can find the time and energy to read incredibly boring and dry academic papers to educate yourself on a topic then good for you. But most people can't, especially given most people work/study full time. Not implying that you don't, just saying that most people aren't machines, and our brains didn't evolve to read peer review journal articles.

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

*Climates change is just a super dangerous religious cult - and a way to steal $ - nothing more! No one can debunk the video below - no at all one.* kzread.info/dash/bejne/a6yhtrinlMjOmqQ.html This video is only meant for rational people. If climates change cultists want to see their devil feel free to watch.

Nice vid, thanks.

Excellent video!

I felt like the animations and the whole video was alive and trying to tell me something. Amazingly well made, loved everything: the sounds, the music, the calmness, the objectivity and so much more. Thank you for this.

@TheConstitutionFirst

2 жыл бұрын

*Since Neil is uncertain* *This video shows the natural forms of carbon emissions and the logical ways to a cleaner environment.* kzread.info/dash/bejne/p6ptm5iJfaXclM4.html