How much ammo did a U.S. Rifleman carry? Well, how much ya got?

@SGTMillerm

Ай бұрын

In Iraq I carried 13 30rnd mags on my body and 8 in my day bag. And in a duffle bag in back of hummvee we had 25 full mags. When I carried the m203 with my m4 I carried 7 40mm grenades for it

@HSPAWN-ps3bf

Ай бұрын

​@@SGTMillerm if liberals wanna know why you carry that much ammo i gotchu. Because America mother fucker thats why 😂 thank you for your service ✊🇺🇲

@VeRA-CRUZ01

Ай бұрын

​@SGTMillerm, thank you for your service.

@T1A4437

Ай бұрын

​@@SGTMillermthanks for your service! How many did you empty

@SGTMillerm

Ай бұрын

@@T1A4437 every day on average. More than half of my mags. Sometimes less. Sometimes way more. Some days none. Depends on the day

Youll never hear a soldier say "i wish i had less ammo". Theyll carry as much as theyre comfortable with

@Appa_Snow

Ай бұрын

Wait until you get to a machine gun team and you're humping 1000 7.62 😂

@andrew5875

Ай бұрын

True story. It always seems like ya can’t carry enough of It. Atleast that how I felt hump a SAW around lol

@larserik8899

Ай бұрын

Idk man bullets get pretty heavy on long movements 😂

@neubauerjoseph

Ай бұрын

That is true as a ex navy sailor ….. the only time they would not take any is if it’s slowing them down ……… and or they ran out of places to put them

@ausprinzip2881

Ай бұрын

​@@larserik8899 When I was a machine gunner my company decided to use the new GPMG like a light machine gun, meaning the machine gunner had to carry everything by himself, including 1000 rounds of 7.62×51. Never weighed that shit, but I estimate the ammo alone to be 25-30kg (55-66 lbs). Definitly made me question my life choices when being on a week long live fire exercise.

The soldier's nightmare is to RUN out of bullets in the middle of a fight...

@michaelbenjmitchell1

Ай бұрын

I do wish the Military would go back to the tried and true wood and metal entrenching tools as those were designed with hand to hand fighting in mind.

@urielgrey

Ай бұрын

Agreed and I think honestly it's anyone nightmare! Just thinking home invasion or a cop facing someone trying to kill them. It's nightmare fuel!

@stevenmiller7267

Ай бұрын

Fact🇺🇲👍✝️

@JACCO20082012

Ай бұрын

It ain't just soldiers. If you carry a gun professionally, you've had a nightmare or 50 of being in the shit and either running out of ammo or having it malfunction.

@leggonarm9835

Ай бұрын

That's called pick a gun off the ground.

They carried as much as they felt comfortable as to stay alive! 😮

@asymsolutions

Ай бұрын

*They carried as much as they could get for to stay alive! FTFY, at least in regards to the guys doing shit like clipping them to their bandoliers, belts and shoving clips in there pockets

@entrepreneurialhacks1255

20 күн бұрын

? Worded strangely but understood

@pyroAdapt

16 күн бұрын

So he was what? 18? And went to go didn't the deadliest war in history? Good man.... good man.

@josevvaladez8080

14 күн бұрын

It enough.

@glitchvlogs6597

2 күн бұрын

the comfortable amount is the most amount.

That one dude who got the whole squad covered: _Muffled giggling_

@thesysop4998

Ай бұрын

Muffled by ammo

@Derek_Wyld

Ай бұрын

@@thesysop4998Muffled by deez nuts

@vaclav_fejt

27 күн бұрын

Yes, because he's carrying it in a M1919 belt. For the dude who carries the M1919.

@quoang

23 күн бұрын

Bandoliers in a cross, bandoliers around the thigh, bandoliers...

@SirDiamondNips

22 күн бұрын

Ain't no fun if the homies can't have none.

30-06 is such a great cartridge

@scottmccloud9029

Ай бұрын

Great cure for p dough files.

@Shwifty69

Ай бұрын

@@scottmccloud9029fr

@eyeballpapercut4400

Ай бұрын

​@@scottmccloud9029 eh don't waste such good ammo on that, just dump a few .38 or .22 with utmost disrespect

@srcastic8764

Ай бұрын

It is a great round. But it’s overkill for human targets and they’re huge and heavy. As he said, a bandolier only carried 80 rounds. Today a bandolier carries 210 of 5.56, which is more than adequate for human targets. I know I’d rather have 210 than 80.

@TheArklyte

Ай бұрын

​@@srcastic8764 .338 Norma that US tries to adopt to ruin NATO standardisation says hello

My Grandfather is a WWII ARMY Veteran. He says his M1 was his best friend. He just turned 100! To all out there serving our country, thank you for your service. 🙏🏻🇺🇸🙏🏻

@details78

Ай бұрын

God bless that man. My grandfathers, both WW2 vets, would have turned 100 in the year 2025.

@007ElSenor

Ай бұрын

Respect for your dad, and a happy 100th! My dad and every uncle were WWII veterans. Three in Korea, one Airborne , two in the Navy on aircraft carriers. One uncle in the Marines was killed in the Pacific Theater, my dad’s older brother survived Guadalcanal and other islands. One uncle was a ball turret gunner (50 missions). All deceased now, miss them all.

@wejustsawmanfly

29 күн бұрын

Americans and your fetish of praising the army... Can you even imagine not going to war/ starting one every 5 mins ?

@kasession

28 күн бұрын

What a blessing. My father was a WW2 Vet. If he was still around, I would spend all my waking hours at his feet as I plied him with questions about his experience in WW2.

@ejasonrichmond

28 күн бұрын

Tell your Grandpa, "Much respect" from me please. My Grandpa was a WW2 vet as well.

In Vietnam, I carried an M16 with twenty 20-round magazines.

@nunya_bizniz

27 күн бұрын

👍

@cosmo5102

27 күн бұрын

Thank you my guy for your defense of my freedom and putting your life on the line! Rest in peace to those who did not make it home!

@factsnotfeelingssendit5961

26 күн бұрын

Did you only load 19? Rock and roll

@carlito___fml2652

26 күн бұрын

@@cosmo5102Yeah that’s totally what the US was doing in Vietnam, protecting your “freedom”.

@nickkohlmann

26 күн бұрын

​@@carlito___fml2652Yeah... what a delusional comment.

Some WW2 Marines I knew said they'd carry as much as they thought they needed, if there was plenty to be had it was "Take as much as you want!" but 200 rounds for the M1 was considered sufficient. And remember, not only did the riflemen have to carry ammo for their own weapon in most cases they also had to carry ammo for the machine guns as well. Those MG's didn't feed themselves and the gunners couldn't carry it all. And with all that the Marine philosophy was still "You can only carry so many rounds, so don't waste 'em!"

@markrossow6303

Ай бұрын

yes "Rifleman" is the USMC term -- "Infantryman" for the Army

@wayneantoniazzi2706

Ай бұрын

@@markrossow6303 And don't forget, no matter what his MOS, "Military Occupational Specialty" might be every Marine from the Commandant on down carries the additional MOS of "rifleman." And all are required to qualify with the rifle once a year.

@someoneelsethatisirrelevan1769

Ай бұрын

200 rounds for M1 Garand is like 50 cycles of reload 🤔

@AndrewAMartin

Ай бұрын

@@someoneelsethatisirrelevan1769 No, half that, or 25. 200 divided by 8 is 25, not 50. Apparently, in addition to irrelevant, you're also innumerate...

@someoneelsethatisirrelevan1769

Ай бұрын

@@AndrewAMartin oh, right.... I was thinking about 4 but it's actually 8. Yeah, thanks for correcting me

I've read that standard issue was 96 rounds a day. Of course, that really didn't mean much.

@sqike001ton

Ай бұрын

That was without the bandoliers you almost never see us troops in combat without 1-4 bandoliers

@donwyoming1936

Ай бұрын

96 rounds was two bandoleers, and seems to be the standard amount of ammo issued. 30-06 is heavy. A rifleman didn't go around with a full cartridge belt & 4 bandoleers. If I remember correctly, the average soldier fired less than 48 rounds in combat during their entire time in the war.

@skeeterskoville9226

Ай бұрын

Yeah that statement was for tax purposes 😂

@michaelbenjmitchell1

Ай бұрын

@@donwyoming1936 My grandfather went through more than that during the Battle of the Bulge. And he was a BAR gunner.

@epicsage16

Ай бұрын

@@donwyoming1936That’s the thing about averages. A lot of guys never fired a round, while some guys fired hundreds. It all has to do with where and when they were assigned to be and what role they played.

Across the various battlefields of the past hundred years or so, if you were to ask an infantryman how much ammo he carries, his answer would almost always be: “as much as I can get my hands on”.

@mikga45

Ай бұрын

True answer

@nicholashodges201

28 күн бұрын

After the self encased cartridge, definitely. For *some reason* soldiers in the loose powder & ball era only seemed to want to carry as much as they absolutely needed. A stray spark or even too much atmospheric static before a storm could *really* mess up your day.

@ethanweeter2732

27 күн бұрын

You mean what you can carry? You have to be able to carry that weight everywhere.

@willkenny5687

25 күн бұрын

@@nicholashodges201 that’s why I said “the past hundred years or so”.

@willkenny5687

25 күн бұрын

@@ethanweeter2732 Oftentimes what you could get your hands on was less than what you could carry. It is possible to carry *a lot* of ammunition, and ammo allotments rarely reach that maximum.

1958-1963 our basic load for the M1 was 148 rounds 1962 We, 82nd Airborne were about to deploy into South America. As we drew live Ammo the old WW2, KOREAN combat vet SGT said "Fill your pockets with all the Ammo and grenades you can carry.

@markrossow6303

Ай бұрын

South America ?

@mikemarthaller8789

Ай бұрын

Yes We, never the full division at one time deployed several time to South, Central America 61-63

@sasquatch4liffee

Ай бұрын

You were issued an M1 in 1962 at the 82nd? Were you supply or admin?

@mikemarthaller8789

Ай бұрын

When the Army converted to the M 14 the 82nd kept our M1 garands, carbines, BAR Etc. I held several MOS And spent a lot of my 6 years AD on various Marksmanship units. The word was our CG Said our gear is battle tested.. Since we often deployed to ?? He would not change. We also still had our Horseshoe packs When I arrived on Okinawa in 63 the 173rd had the M 14 and ALICE Pack web gear

@Peter-jo6yu

Ай бұрын

​@@mikemarthaller8789 Awesome sir 🤟💙

Just wear like a hundred bandoliers 🤯🤯🤯

@WorldWarFanatic1123

Ай бұрын

Lot of weight to carry lol

@Furrysshoulddie

Ай бұрын

@@WorldWarFanatic1123fr

@Pen-sq7bj

Ай бұрын

​@@WorldWarFanatic1123through?

@kjp.7714

Ай бұрын

​@@WorldWarFanatic1123fr fr

@gatsu8634

Ай бұрын

There's a reason infantrymen have fucked up knees

Better to have it and not need it, than to need it and not have it. E'nuff said!

@jonesy19691

26 күн бұрын

Absolutely, i say that alot.

@Whitehot724

24 күн бұрын

That's what I think on weekly trip to Gun Runners

@Luis-be9mi

20 күн бұрын

Something my father always said when he was in Nam on long marches. “I rather be sweating from carrying excess ammo, than be bleeding with an empty rifle.”

@AkaChales2012

17 күн бұрын

Just like a condom or a seatbelt 🤝

I've often been annoyed while watching a film set in WWII and noticing clearly empty ammo belts. But I saw an interview with one of the Rangers that climbed Point du Hoc on D-Day, he stated he rarely filled his belt, preffering the bandoleers.

Always carry enough ammo for the battle you dont want to be in. I learned that the hard way in Sadr City. I always carried 300 rounds of .308 for my M-14. .30-06 is even heavier and guys back then were skinny as hell.

@drsteelhead7278

Ай бұрын

A friend of mine was Army in Vietnam. He said he carried 250 rounds for his M14, in addition to his M79 and its own ammo.

@mikga45

Ай бұрын

@@drsteelhead7278 there is lots to carry. Laws rockets, grenades, claymore mines, if your s grenadier Vietnam the m-79 and modern day The m203 which both fired 40 mm grenades. The stove pipe 90mm recoilless rifle Vietnam era late 70's hand grenades, flares. Weapon issued ammo. Took as much as you could get. 50 caliber rifles were assigned to csc. Back when I was in they had 2 lb sticks of c-4 and TNT was available. C-4 was easier to work with. 28 lbs of c-4 tapped to a jeep would throw it 40 or 50 feet through the air. People who were 11b10 infantry felt like pack mules. Had to carry sea rats also came in box with cigarettes 4 sticks in a pack. I use to get the smokes from the people who did not smoke.each company had 3 rifle platoons and 1 mortar platoon. The battalion had a csc who were issues the 50 calibers. TOWs rockets. They had vehicles and are platoons who were not combat support company walked everywhere. Sometimes helicopters Huey's brought us to a location and we walked from there or csc transported us on drive and a halfs. We did lots of walking. Many of the infantry at the time we're going mechanized, not us. Spent very little time on APC.

@JustRememberWhoYoureWorkingFor

Ай бұрын

​@@drsteelhead7278 and also their sidearm right?

@MaximusTheGreat509

Ай бұрын

@@JustRememberWhoYoureWorkingForsidearms were issued to soldiers further back like artillery, rifleman just got rifle

@DogBeast221

Ай бұрын

What’s your assessment of the M-14? I’ve heard some disparaging things from other veterans.

JESUS christ up to 200 rounds of 30-06. Those old boys must have been some angry soldiers lmao

@asymsolutions

Ай бұрын

Or guys that survived long enough to know better. There is a saying "Ammo is like money, there's never enough when you absolutely need it". Or as Clint Smith says "I have never heard anyone say they had too much ammunition in a fight".

@Rixoli

Ай бұрын

Never too much ammo, ever. It made sense 80 years ago, it still holds true today.

@tufelhunden5795

Ай бұрын

It just shows how high their testosterone levels were compared to today. Average guy was 5’6” and weighed 140 carrying ammo like it’s going out of style. Now u hear people saying 200 rounds of 5.56 is too much. 😂

@inreallife530

Ай бұрын

@@tufelhunden5795tf does testosterone have to do with it☠️

@tufelhunden5795

Ай бұрын

@@inreallife530 it builds strength. It’s why the average small man back then was stronger than the average bigger man now. The current young men have lower t levels than I do in my mid fifties. Mine, in my twenties, was lower than my grandfathers in his 60’s. We are becoming weaker and something is attacking our T. That all I was getting at. They carried a heavier rifle, heavier ammo and supplies while 3” shorter and 30 pounds lighter.

Running out of ammo in-game is tragic enough, imagine the feeling of your heart dropping when you realize you're out of ammo in combat.

@Tank50us

24 күн бұрын

If a modern soldier, especially an American one, were to ever run out of ammunition, something has gone _horribly_ wrong.

@azndrew1

10 күн бұрын

​@@Tank50ushow much ammo does a modern day US soldier take into a combat situation on average??

@Tank50us

10 күн бұрын

@@azndrew1 Today? Anywhere from 5 to 10 magazines, plus the one in their rifle. Though some may take more.

@benkelly2190

4 күн бұрын

A gamer! And you’re comparing yourself to these men?

@ZaHandle

Күн бұрын

@@benkelly2190The pipeline of controller to enlisting is pretty wide

Ohhh but when I put on my grandpas uniform it's called a hate crime😠

@HesNotThatScary

Ай бұрын

its not a hate crime.

@HesNotThatScary

Ай бұрын

its not a hate crime, anyone that says that might have something wrong in their heads, but yet again, we think differently

@ordavis

Ай бұрын

​@@HesNotThatScary The comment was a joke about presumably wearing a German uniform

@RandomAccount21377

Ай бұрын

good.

@MatthewHeraghty

Ай бұрын

@@ordavis that took me a while to realize, lol

How much does 200 rounds of 30-06 plus clips weigh? I bet several viewers can go to their ammo supply and let all know!

@PitFriend1

Ай бұрын

Two 100 round belts of 7.62x51mm NATO weighs 12 pounds. So 200 .30-06 rounds plus the clips should be a little heavier as they’re slightly larger cartridges.

@crossfire2045

Ай бұрын

​@@PitFriend1maybe 26-28 pounds probably considering that the 30-.06 is larger and you have double the amount

@popinmo

Ай бұрын

depends my grandfather had some laying around of m2ap black tip steel core rounds which are tool steel bullets that go through a 1inch of steel

@ball3677

Ай бұрын

​@crossfire2045 thats a lotta weight just for ammo damn. At least soldiers back then didnt have to hump the bigass rucksacks todays soldiers use

@sqike001ton

Ай бұрын

​@@PitFriend1I think 26 pounds 30 if they are in BAR mags

Meanwhile these days 7 30 round mags is minimum for a patrol loadout

@TheCrusher72

Ай бұрын

But I found that was actually about right. We'd sling 1 MAYBE 2 bandoliers...

@kuessebrama

Ай бұрын

Yeah because of that reason they switched to 5.56, because it is lighter and you can carry way more ammo. The same ammount of 30-06 would be really heavy.

@garythesquidsquid7779

10 сағат бұрын

​I read 300 rnds of 30 06 is almost 18 pounds. 300 556 is about 8. Dont know how accurate that is though​@@kuessebrama

A soviet soldier with mosin rifle carried 50 rounds in clips + 5 rounds in the rifle. A soldier with AVS-36 or SVT-40 would typically carry 80 rounds on mags +10 rounds, but some soldiers with AVS-36 or full auto modification of SVT-40 (a super rare version issued to one division only, although some soldiers modified their rifles for full auto DIY. DIY full auto versions lost the ability to fire semi-auto) would carry some extra ammo.

@tterryshenanigans1820

Ай бұрын

To be fair the guys toting a mosin needed extra room to carry a mallet to shoot what they had.

@sqike001ton

Ай бұрын

I think that was on the belt 60 each of the ammo packs could hold 3 5rd clips I think they were on paper issued an extra 3 packs of 20 rounds to refill there pouches or to give to the DPM gunner plus before combat if you could you would load 5 into the rifle giving you 65-125 rounds Germans were similar except I think there pouches could hold 20 rounds and the Japanese had 80 in front pouches and 80 in the back pouch the Brits used bandoliers to carry rifle ammo as the belt pouches were for bren gun mags so on paper I think Brits carried 80 in 1 bandolier

@jonthinks6238

Ай бұрын

The soviets were lucky if they even had a rifle, much less ammo. They were resuppled by stripping the dead and wounded.

@vladislavshevchenko634

Ай бұрын

@@jonthinks6238 who told you such BS? You might be surprised, but infantry regiments the western military district was almost fully rearmed to semi/full auto rifles by 1941 according to the 04/401 template freely available online. You're can search (04/401 штат советской армии) and see some pictures. Obviously not all the units were rearmed, but rearmament of the western military district was almost completed. Which means that the old rifles were taken away for storage and new were given out. It gives us the rifles given out to the people after the mass mobilization was called up. The amount of mosin rifles produced throughout history is 37 million. 32 of them were produced by the Soviet Union. By 1941 Soviet Union had about 9 million Mosin rifles. The amount of soldiers in the Soviet army on 22nd of June 5,7 million. Apart from rifles soldiers also had machine guns, SMG's, pistols (for officers and commissaries according to 04/401 and 04/751 templates as well as some non combat troops). So if we just arm every soldier with a Mosin rifle, we'll be left with 3.3 million Mosin rifles together with all the other weapon types. Therefore every soldier had at least some weapon and didn't have to loot the dead for ammo unless for emergency circumstances like encirclements, which granted, happened a lot in the beginning of the war.

@RevOwOlutionary

Ай бұрын

@@jonthinks6238 That's a myth originating from Nazi propaganda and spread by Hollywood.

The current rifleman’s loadout in the US military is seven 30-round magazines for the M4 Carbine: 210 rounds of 5.56x45 ammo. Some carry triple this.

@tattooedman42

Ай бұрын

Did the military switch to all M4's? I carried an M16A2, carrying handle removed with full rail system and various attachments ( red dot, back-up iron sights, flashlight, vertical front handle, etc. ). This was when I went to Iraq in 05-06.

@edmondlau511

Ай бұрын

@@tattooedman42yep. Even guard and reserve have the M4 now. The M9 is also gone replaced by the Sig Sauer M17 which is a P320 with manual safety. The M17 is a nice shooting pistol, better than the M9, in my opinion.

@tattooedman42

Ай бұрын

@@edmondlau511 Thank you for the update.

@mlew14

26 күн бұрын

Yes sir! I still do to this day. I fill my dump pouch with mags

Bro got an m1 garand and made it his whole personality

Bandoliers works for putting ammo on your person but they suck for access.

Being a German ww2 soldier and getting hit by a 30-06 round must been terrible

@David-hm9ic

25 күн бұрын

The .30-'06 round is not substantially different in size, weight or power from the German 8mm round used against Allied forces. The 8mm Mauser round is marginally more powerful.

@ZaHandle

Күн бұрын

Luckily you won't feel it much

WW2 soldiers seldom fired more than 48 rounds in combat during the entire war. Many, never fired their rifles at all. A very small number of troops did the lion's share of the shooting. An anomaly that continued for decades.

@lyntwo

Ай бұрын

That study was determined to be flawed but it did cause a change in marksmanship training for the US Army. I do not know about the other branches so I mean no slight.

@doogleticker5183

25 күн бұрын

@@lyntwo - Got a reference for the study? Interesting...

@thomasdalton1508

24 күн бұрын

Of course, many soldiers weren't in combat roles where firing their rifle would be expected. An army needs enormous numbers of people in support roles. Drivers, mechanics, cooks, etc. My grandfather never fired his rifle in anger, but that's not surprising given that he was a carpenter. He was with HQ a few miles back from the front line fixing things. If he needed to use his rifle, something was going extremely wrong.

@cattysplat

2 күн бұрын

@@thomasdalton1508 My British grandfather spend the whole war on defence in Egypt in a trench whilst tanks fought in the desert. My American grandfather was dropping bombs on Japan and survived, only to die in the Korean war a few years later. Was certainly not fair where you got posted or what would happen to you there.

@thomasdalton1508

2 күн бұрын

@@cattysplat Absolutely. You serve how and where the army needs you. My grandfather wanted to be a radio operator, but the army couldn't care less what he wanted. He was more useful to them as a carpenter (since that was what he was trained as in civilian life), so that's what they told him he had to do. War and fairness have nothing to do with each other.

When I was rifleman i carried 200 rounds. Back in 76 to 79. When I was a m-60 machine gunner we carried as much as we could varry me and my assisant gunner. Its neen a long time the m60 fired from open bolt position and it was belt fed. If memory does not fail me it was in boxes of 100 rounds in a small box. I would think we carried at least 500 rounds between me and assistant gunner who had to carry and extra barrell and tripod.

@mikga45

Ай бұрын

Machine Gunner and assistant gunner back than carried wore out 1911 45 acp. Never jammed and throwing a rock is more accurate. I civilian world I owned a Springfield and a few other 45 acp in 1911 and they were accurate. The military 45 we had was WWII issue

@jimgaul67

26 күн бұрын

In VN selected riflemen each carried a belt o M-60 ammo. In addition the assistant gunner carried at least one can and a couple of belts of 60 ammo. You would hump either a belt of 60 ammo, a claymore or a LAW. Personally I carried 250-300 rounds of 5.56 mm. Never got low on ammo…. Thank God, but if you’re firing at full auto you can burn through it pretty fast.

I appreciate your channel. It’s very informative and shows how much work you have put in to make these enjoyable videos. Thank you.

Most important thing is to make every shot count

@doogleticker5183

25 күн бұрын

What the hell is that supposed to mean? It's not like soldiers put fire on random objects!!

@garymathena2125

10 күн бұрын

You obviously have NO idea what you are talking about. You are not at the range, you shoot at whatever you think the fire is coming from, and you pray and cuss at the same time.

@cattysplat

2 күн бұрын

@@doogleticker5183 It means don't run out of ammo. Because a soldier with no ammo is a defenceless sitting duck waiting to get picked off.

"An army marches on its stomach"- Napoleon Bonaparte

Absolutely love your videos. I am also a very big World War II nerd.❤

*”Move out of the door”*

So that's why the max ammo is 240 with the M1 garand in cod big red one!

When I deployed, I did convoy operations. I carried what I wanted. Which was 210 rounds.

@geraldbouvy1222

23 күн бұрын

That was nice, when we could just customize our load outs. It suckes going back to garrison and playing the Class A game again. I swear I would volunteer for deployments just to get out of wearing that monkey suite. I HATED GARRISON.

Considering the stadard Army issued loadout at least was 210 rds of 5.56 ~7 magazines, from a cartridge that weighs roughly half of a .30-06, it's wild those boys were carrying, in some cases, the same quantity of ammo. That said, they also didn't have to wear IOTVs or IBAs that more than made up for the weight difference.

Thank you for another great video!

Nice vid again world war wisdom

That's really interesting thank you for doing your homework and honoring the greatest generation. I wish my late grandfather could see your video. He would have appreciated it I think😊

Thank God for those soldiers who made sure evil never won. Thank you guys for your service. We will never forget

You should dip your dummy rounds in black paint just the tips tho since they mainly used AP 30-06

@CharlieFoxtrot128

Ай бұрын

They were not using AP ammo in WWII. No one was using body armor back then. And no standard small arm is penetrating heavy armor. AP ammo would be useless and cost more

Not an American so I don’t know a lot about Ammunition weight but how much would 200 hundreds roughly weigh? Like would you feel it?

@dr.krimson1010

Ай бұрын

You would. The .30-06 round weighs roughly 26 grams. That's bullet, case, powder and primer. If you carry 200 of the things that's roughly 5.2 kg of extra weight. Not an extreme amount, but something that is very noticeable.

@davidmurphy8364

Ай бұрын

@@dr.krimson1010 Ah yeah you’d definitely be feeling that weight especially over a distance! Thanks very much for explaining that to me man I appreciate you taking the time🙂

@Taxevader-gk9ms

Ай бұрын

@@davidmurphy8364 imagine being the guy hoarding 1,000 rounds on him absolute unit

@charlesbravo4224

Ай бұрын

A lot

@geraldbouvy1222

23 күн бұрын

It sucks with the IBA. It is like carrying around a REALLLY FAT BABY.

At the armory they said take whatever you want.

A typical Bar gunner would have 12 magazines of 20 of 30-06 + 4-6 more magazines on bandoliers .... 240 - 320 lead Talking about

@jeffriley-lq5np

Ай бұрын

actually the bar man had two guy helping to tote its ammo

@starscreamsdkfz475

Ай бұрын

@@jeffriley-lq5np that is also true, but still, he would carry all these ammo.

The Weapon that Won The War, The M1 Garand.

@raymondjarvis765

27 күн бұрын

😂😂 I think mister Enfield would have something to say about that

@4sythdude549

26 күн бұрын

It has certainly Won The War against many a soldier's thumb!

It was common to pick up ammo and weapons along the way as well, just like we do in video games. Say you're in the middle of a gunfight and you're down to like 3 bullets left. Everybody is pinned down and nobody can bring you ammo. It goes without saying that you're gonna be looting the nearest dead body like it's a Walmart clearance sale and you just got your tax refund.

I love the M1 Garand especially the sound it made when needed to be reloaded with a new magazine. Favourite weapon in the first Call of Duty game.

Imagine being a rifleman in Dday with an M1 and the germans have an 8mm that smokes ur entire squads ammo in 20 seconds

The correct answer is as much as they could carry and depending on the mission. Bear in mind a lot of these guys had a farming or labourer background so were already used to physically demanding work before going through their training that made them stronger and tougher.

@Gunsbeerfreedom87

Ай бұрын

The average WW2 GI was malnourished and grew up without sufficient caloric intake, usually leading to stunted growth. That's why they were all 5'6 and 140lbs.

These are the videos we need on social media

Depending on how far away you were to the supply lines & how much fighting you did on the daily was the base rate of what you'd carry. Then if you were holding a position you'd probably carry more than If you were marching. If you were marching then you would obviously be further away from a supply line and want to carry more, so you would carry as much as you could based on your strength and endurance but not so much that you would get weighed down. So this answer varies from person to person. But within every platoon or battalion there is always that big guy who could carry a thousand rounds and basically distribute to everyone else. You always want to be near that guy!

The pockets on the M43 Uniform were huge. I keep more m blocks in them in engagements.

@idontlikecommunists9677

Ай бұрын

Do you mean En-blocs?

In COD they gave five rounds and one rifle for every two soldiers ( Stalingrad map )

He's so young but his passion runs so deep. Keep it up brother

I remember book the Things They Carried. There was a guy that always carried alot of ammo and rations, and he ended up unalived weight down by the extra weight

@fjb4932

27 күн бұрын

"...unalived..." Dead ? Don't be afraid, it won't hurt you, just say it. "D E A D" Dead... ☆

if the m1 garand was included in GTA 6 then this is the gear.

@Jay931

Ай бұрын

GTA is stupid. Need to quit playing that poison

@xSoulhunterDKx

Ай бұрын

@@Jay931 wdym? GTA6 will be awesome for sure^^

Just be like Fortnite have 1000 ammo in your back bling or gun

My dad, combat veteran of the 41st Infantry Div, the Jungleers, only carried on bandolier for his M1, but also two bandoliers for the BAR man.

My passed away granpa was WWII Germany Army veteran. He was service SS Totenkopf division. Rest hes soul.

I always feel an immense amount of pride seeing the photos of these guys.

Take as much ammo possible because you never know especially in WW2.

So he would carry as much as he could and be asking for more. Your knowledge always amazed me sir

CoD Zombie players definitely love this gun. Especially the ping it makes after the last bullet.

“Hey, Brad, I’m running low. Can I have a couple of your clips?” *Brad muffles an affirmative from beneath a full suit of .308 armor and passes him a few*

Modern day standard is 210 rounds... 7 - 30rd mags... but the actual answer is how much you got.

For reference, standard combat load for main battle rifle (m16,m4) was 210 rounds when i was in infantry in Afghanistan. Most of us had at least one extra magazine, some had a few more. 45 rounds 9mm, and if its a heavy op we would crossload mortar rounds.

Always respect for some of the hardest MF'ers that ever lived.. Thank you for your sacrifices men. 🤝🏻

@-_-ligma

24 күн бұрын

Bros cheering on a bunch of r*peist

The dudes wearing two bandoliers with entra clips attached to their bandoliers are a big mood.

Thanks for the link I been looking for a decent reproduction bandoleer for my 1903 Springfield.

Now just think about what type of tough S.O.B.s them guys were. The M1 Garand was about a 10lb. rifle. Not exactly sure how heavy 8 rounds in an en bloc clip, but I'm guessing about 8oz., or more. I seem to recall the U.S government phased out the M-14, the upgrade to the M1, because it, and it's 7.62x51mm cartridge were considered too heavy for a soldier to carry, and our boys carried the M1 and as much ammo as they could carry all across Europe, and eventually throughout the Pacific. Damn!... Those guys truly were the greatest, and the toughest, generation! Here's to them🍻 God bless the heroes of WW2.

I asked my father how much ammo they carried for their M-16s when he was in Vietnam and Cambodia as an E5 with the U.S. Army 1st Infantry Division from 1969-1970. He said as much as they could comfortably manage and thus it varied from soldier to soldier. He carried a bit less M-16 ammo, though, as he also carried an M79 grenade launcher (aka "blooper") with 40mm fléchette rounds.

Indeed. Spare M1 Garand and M1 Carbine trigger groups were a popular pocket item. By grinding down the spring diameter on concrete or with files they became full auto. A match grade trigger job on an ex friends gone to far. They learned to counter the MP 40 and MG 42. And a take home souvenir.

You'll never be seeing a American yelling "I NEED MO BOOLETS!!"

Yay, you’re back. Every video is awesome. Keep them coming.

"I only carry the recommended amount of equipment and ammunition". Said no soldier with a straight face ever.

Excellent video!

this guy looks like winters

Imagine scavenging your fallen brothers for ammo in desperate situations. Thank you sincerely to those who fought for us.

My Uncle said they would carry as much as they could get their hands on depending on how bad the mission or assignment was apparently going to be.Many times they would have a stash point especially if they had to fall back to a redoubt line ….a secondary defense line.

I salute these warriors (friends or foes) for not having flak jackets in a firefight to stop a round from tearing through flesh and bones.

Wow that's a Great explanation of the question. Plus the M1 Garand Rifle was then known too be the best infantry Rifle on the Battlefield at that time. Thanks for Sharing.

some lucky mad lad must have stopped a bullet with how much ammo he was carrying.

Important: This guy demonstrated the critical difference between a "clip" and a magazine, for carrying and loading small arms ammo. Nearly all pistols and rifles today use a magazine, and not a clip (although some types of ammo are still stored in a "clip".)

Never can have too much ammo

as a marine its crazy we still get issued those same style bandoliers for the range and such

“Uh…oops?” 😅

My Uncles in WW1, my Dad and Uncles during WW2 and Korea, and myself in Vietnam all saw Basic Combat Load as the bare minimum. A few steps outside the wire can be a long supply line

My grandfather told me that his father who was an garand rifleman barely shot his gun, so for the average rifle infantryman 80 rounds is plenty, in the films it feels like even 200 rounds per rifle isn't enough, but in reality when you're down on the ground you're either looking for a target or a machinegun.

Imagine going into battle with only 80-200 rounds. That would be a fucking nightmare.

a soldiers worst nightmare in ww2 was having to go into battle with no ammo or next to none

It's like he said it very much depended on the situation. Many soldiers bravely faced certain death situations head on. These soldiers would not have gone out fully outfitted. They would have only brought as much as they thought they'd need before being cut down by the enemy fire they were running towards.

If I remember correctly, Wollas Macey told me he carried 300 rounds on the morning of June 6th, 1944, along with 80lbs of explosives. Wollace was 6' 5" and 250lbs though. I've hunted Elk and Deer with an '06 and I don't believe I ever carried more than 2 boxes, or 40 rounds with me, but then again, the Elk and Deer weren't shooting back.

Thus the reason of going from 30-06 to 224 in the M16...ammo less weight and the thought that the smaller cartridge would cause severe injury not death thus causing more combatants to care for wounded...

A soldier understands that despite how grueling it is to carry tons of ammo, its gonna be a lot more painful to carry less than a firefight worth

My dad was a combat medic in Korea. He said they were only given one bullet during gaurd duty.

Remember that scene in Band of Brothers where they were meeting the men retreating from the German attack on Bastogne & realized that they had zero expectations of resupply? They started asking the walking wounded if they had any ammo & took whatever they had,even partial bandoliers of ammunition as an officer drove up with what he could load into a jeep & trailer before the ammunition dump was overrun.

Fun fact, for the modern Australian Army soldier, the standard is 7 x magazines of 30 (210 rounds) and 8 x 100 belts for machine gunners.

Eu acho que essa atitude do Tin só prova que ele é o maior da história do Brasil. O cara dar a cara a tapa no calor do momento assim é gigante!

In the early years of the war, Brits, Canadians, Aussies etc., had very, very little ammo, supplies, food, etc. The boys (my dad included) had to make do with very little ammo. It was one of the reasons, they valued and employed accurate fire, very limited burts on full auto etc.

When i fired Garand with the appropriate citizen program gun club, the ammo issue was in those resupply bandoleers and it was so cool.