This sounds like a goddamn nightmare to figure out.

@espantalho93

8 жыл бұрын

+Jared Stott Why do you think it takes years to make a movie? ;)

@VitalMusic217

7 жыл бұрын

It took years at that time. Now they just pay a CGI study to do it.

@HCkev

7 жыл бұрын

I hope you don't think CGI is a quick and easy process.

@VitalMusic217

7 жыл бұрын

No, but they don´t do it. They pay third parties.

@ricarleite

6 жыл бұрын

A computer did all the calculations.

I love that Ian McKellen casually sticks the prop pipe in his mouth even though they aren't filming.

@tittos9651

5 жыл бұрын

Lmao

@nisms5048

5 жыл бұрын

Signs of a real actor always in character

@brody-5632

5 жыл бұрын

They are filming.. you're not seeing the past through a crystal ball

@galihmukti

5 жыл бұрын

@@ericcartman1328 hmmm, your comment reminds me of something..

@beastvader

5 жыл бұрын

@@ericcartman1328 Is that a reference to The Simpsons or Tropic Thunder? I forget

This video stopped so abruptly I thought I was about to receive a phone call.

@sweetaple100

5 жыл бұрын

Can't relate, nobody calls me lol

@morningcoffee1111

5 жыл бұрын

Lol

@robin100012001

5 жыл бұрын

damn that was funny

@DarkTranqz

5 жыл бұрын

Lmfao riiight. I thought an ad was about to play 😂

@Sir-Blaze

5 жыл бұрын

Me too

why do the actors always get all the recognition. these skilled super craftsmen are fantastic

@guitarman0365

5 жыл бұрын

all the effects and set design in the world won't make for a good film without the actors to carry the story along. They definitely do need more recognition but that is just the way it is. Craftmans create the world but the actors take us for the ride.

@jordangordon2350

5 жыл бұрын

Because the actors is all you see unless you go out of your way to find behind the scenes stuff. Casuals don't do that

@LIlbulldog2233

5 жыл бұрын

The trilogy won in total 17 oscars I'd say that's recognition

@gutenman7112

5 жыл бұрын

Because normal fans doesnt benefit them . All they need is a good reputation for the movie industries who really appreciated their work .

@pwnmeisterage

5 жыл бұрын

How many people line up for movie tickets because a Famous Big Name did the camera work?

This is how they make Tom Cruise look regular height. Costs studios an extra 5-10 million, but they do it.

@seikibrian8641

5 жыл бұрын

What do you mean? Tom Cruise is 5'11" -- just ask him. ;-)

@pwnmeisterage

5 жыл бұрын

Camera point of view is always at "chin" or "chest" level. It makes everybody on TV or film seem tall and robust, even when they're not. The same way a child sees adults.

@seikibrian8641

5 жыл бұрын

@@pwnmeisterage Not "always," but "typically."

@jonanderirureta8331

5 жыл бұрын

That was brilliant

@LacuinFamily

5 жыл бұрын

You fool! Hahahaha

I thought it was CGI. So everything midget is just this illusion? Bravo LOTR and Hobbit crew!

@andy86i

7 жыл бұрын

for some shots. Also "scale doubles" were used. That is, a midget with a facemask of The hobbit actors, for shots where its far away and it's all of them running etc

@theenglishman

5 жыл бұрын

Jessrey Mark Solijon there are some uses of digital doubles for the hobbits, but it’s very rare.

@tacticalchunder1207

5 жыл бұрын

They used perspective, small people as doubles, and also created two different sized sets and imposed the shots over each other for some scenes. Very clever and will always hold up and look good.

@noscoperbboyy

5 жыл бұрын

@@tacticalchunder1207 If you watch the scene in fellowship, where Boromir gets hit by the first or second arrow, you see the doubles for merry/pippin, it's thrown me off ever since lol.

@kapitankapital6580

5 жыл бұрын

You'll notice if you pay attention that most scenes where a small guy and a big guy are in the same shot, the shorter character will have his back facing the camera. This is because they are using a double who is wearing the costume, and all the costumes are designed to obscure the look of the actor from the back.

I've watched this 3 times, and my brain still can't figure out how to beat the perception. Absolutely incredible.

@theodorosathanasiadis7489

6 ай бұрын

To be fair, their explanation does not really make much sense either. They just said "move" a lot and not much more.

@brettb.7235

5 ай бұрын

Same here, it’s incredible

@timharig

23 күн бұрын

Very simple. A closer object seems larger than a further object. If you don't move the camera, then everything is fine. The problem is that when you start to move the camera, the parallax movement of closer objects is faster than that of further objects. That breaks the illusion. To compensate, they moved one of the objects along with the camera to match its parallax to the other object. That way it still looks like they are the same distance from the camera.

@siler7

23 күн бұрын

Because it's not shown very well.

@arman9175

12 күн бұрын

@@timharig This is a great explanation, well done

Cgi is really really good sometimes but practical affects is just badass

@kiwi22ism

5 жыл бұрын

Effects

@tangerinetech5300

5 жыл бұрын

If you know how to mix the two you can get something indistinguishable from real life

@coolintuitivename4910

4 жыл бұрын

You will never notice good CGI

@jaimelannister1797

3 жыл бұрын

Practical effects are so much better cause they don’t age as poorly. With something like Star Wars a new hope all the aged effects are cgi effects added in the special edition while the ones that hold up today were practical effects from the 70s

@itsamealex007

2 жыл бұрын

As the hobbit clearly showed.

Now this is movie making and special effects.

@kimblefrost6073

5 жыл бұрын

th way it shud always b done. lazy generation and theyr use of computer imagery. theatre is going to shit

@jimsanoob

5 жыл бұрын

Lol what

@qua4476

5 жыл бұрын

Here we go again with that nostalgia shit

@DVZM.

5 жыл бұрын

@@kimblefrost6073 "lazy generation and theyr use of computer imagery" You are one of those idiots who have zero idea how those things are done but actually think it is easy to do. 👏🏼

@qua4476

5 жыл бұрын

If you think these computers are making people lazy, you better start sending your comments via telegram to youtube

lotr= shot in the best locations of new zealand hobbit= shot in the best locations of new zealand's computer labs

@BlaneNostalgia

5 жыл бұрын

They put so much blood sweat and tears into making the LOTR (Orlando broke a rib, Viggo broke his foot, nightmarish outdoor shooting) I'm actually cool with them taking the CGI route for a change

@MrGizmois703

5 жыл бұрын

@@BlaneNostalgia its the difference between a 10/10 perfect film and a 8/10 average....

@thorsten8790

5 жыл бұрын

@@BlaneNostalgia The Hobbit movies were so mediocre it hurt

@ernestogastelum9123

5 жыл бұрын

@@BlaneNostalgia Viggo almost lost his life if he hadnt deflected the knife when the Uruk-hai threw it at him on the first movie

@stiimuli

5 жыл бұрын

Hobbit was shot on even more locations than LotR. Watch the production vlog and behind the scenes extras. It was a truly massive undertaking.

I liked that Ian McKellan is called Ian McKellan, but Elijah Wood is called Frodo. In the same sentence.

@111Malefic

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah no, that doesn't happen. Listen again.

@lefyre1266

5 жыл бұрын

I still refer to him as Frodo

@333pinkelephant333

5 жыл бұрын

They're using the name Frodo to differentiate between human-sized props and Hobbit-sized props. I guess "Elijah sized props" doesn't click as fast as "Frodo sized props"

@kennarajora6532

3 жыл бұрын

should've called him the arcade kid from back to the future II.

And this shows why the LOTR movies were so damn good, this shows the passion put in. And also makes you see why The Hobbit couldn't live up in any way.

@kyleespinas4702

7 жыл бұрын

I think the hobbit had also done that.

@JackPorter

7 жыл бұрын

the hobbit movies still showed a lot of passion i think... The problem for that movie is with it being based on a 11 page pamphlet!

@Galigula1

5 жыл бұрын

Shame they gave Peter Jackson not more time for the Hobbit films.

@Soldier4USA2005

5 жыл бұрын

@@Galigula1 No. The problem is he made a trilogy (for no reason) out of a much smaller book and it shows. It's nowhere near as well written or developed because it has about 1/4th of the combined material of all of the LotR books and was written for children, culminating in a different style of storytelling. We ended up with story arcs and characters never even mentioned (or barely) in the book, let alone characters actually doing things that directly effect the story. One of the changes was to include Galadriel because there were "too many men". www.thedailybeast.com/the-hobbit-19-changes-from-jrr-tolkiens-novel-to-peter-jacksons-movie

@monke12354

5 жыл бұрын

What? Because of a visual trick? You're putting way too much meaning into this, the same trick was done with The Hobbit too.

Without a doubt one of the best practical effects in the LOTR movies. Which is saying a lot, considering the amount of practical effects mixed with visual effects used in these movies.

"Taken by Isildur from the hand of -" END from the hand of what Gandalf, _FROM THE HAND OF WHAT_

@904austin

5 жыл бұрын

Sauron himself

@kos2919

5 жыл бұрын

The hand of GOBLET OF FIRE

@downfromkentuckeh

5 жыл бұрын

DaveDexterMusic WHATS IN THE BOX

@TonyDootjes

5 жыл бұрын

Boromir Stark Protector of the Realm slayer of Sauron @Bazza Cuda

@ryanprosper88

5 жыл бұрын

yo mama

Incredible. And to think, when you're watching the film you don't even realise what has happened. Cinemagic!

from this to Ian McKellen crying in front of the Hobbit greenscreen

@CaptainMyCaptain33

5 жыл бұрын

What’s your motivation??? You have to cry here and make it believable you old English fuck!!! Ok...ok. (Looks around) got it, Whaaaaa this shit fuckin sucks blimey mates ye whaaaa. Manchester United! Whaaa.

@TheBusbyBabes

5 жыл бұрын

CaptainMyCaptain woah bro not cool

@Necromancer0225

5 жыл бұрын

Ikr , would it kill Peter Jackson to use forced perspective once in a while? Poor Ian

@thesalanian

5 жыл бұрын

They couldn't use the same techniques because they shot all the hobbit films in 3d, that was the studio, not Jackson. He did his best with literally no prep time and constant studio interference when he never wanted to direct the movie in the first place.

@TheBusbyBabes

5 жыл бұрын

@@thesalanian wheither you shoot in 3d or not has no impact on using props or cgi

This is so amazing that even after it's been fully explained I'm still not quite sure how it works

It's quite hard to believe that LOTR was made between 1998-2001 Waaaay before the advancements we have in video technology today. Truly amazing work they did on that first film

I always wondered how they did it without CGI. Michelle Gondry has used these technique in certain shots of movies and music videos. But doing a whole movie based around this technique is nuts. Another reason to love LOTR

These guys are geniuses

Best trilogy of all time. Nothing will ever top LotR

@LuckyNumber48

5 жыл бұрын

Fifty Shades

@deldia

5 жыл бұрын

Fellowship is very nice. The last hour of return is awful.

@mailtoameyeveryday

5 жыл бұрын

Avengers....

@tilmanrotationalinvariant2257

5 жыл бұрын

@@deldia well then u didnt get it...

@deldia

5 жыл бұрын

Tilman Rotational Invariant didn’t get what? That hour of my life back? Yeah

My favourite scene using this illusion (apart from the kitchen table scene) is Gandalf and Frodo in the cart in Hobbiton. Totally seamless and believable.

@mycroft16

5 жыл бұрын

I love that scene in the extras... the way they had to build the cart is ridiculous. Half of it Hobbit sized, half Gandalf sized, right next to each other, on a moving cart, with tracking cameras. I remember watching in theater and wondering how they did some of these... there was no way green screen compositing would have worked and matched up seamlessly.

I love the technics of these films. It really make you wonder if it might've actually been easier to hire 4 shire hobbits, a dwarf, an elf, 2 guys, and a wizard.

Anyone who comes up with such ideas and implements them in this way more than deserves the Academy Award.

Is this why insects are small?

@keremdelialioglu2197

5 жыл бұрын

They are bigger if you look closer

@eternapesadilla2355

5 жыл бұрын

@@keremdelialioglu2197 and if you whisper they can understand you

@Adam-wc6cf

5 жыл бұрын

@@eternapesadilla2355 And before you know it, they're 5 meters tall and is currently taking over the world

@gearz2570

5 жыл бұрын

@@keremdelialioglu2197 woooosh

@GryphonWyng

4 жыл бұрын

I really want to live in this world where insects are human sized, but every time you look at them they're being rolled away on little dolleys to make them look tiny.

I'm too lazy to even understand it. I really appreciate their hard work

Take two mirrors, put one where Gandalf is supposed to look and one where Frodo is supposed to look, and face them at each other. Now the actors can look each other in the eye.

@Frankie2012channel

5 жыл бұрын

It doesn't work like that. You would need MULTIPLE mirrors at exact angles for them to LOOK each other in the eye. The best they could do using your example, would be to show the side of the other actor's head.

@birderjohn3396

5 жыл бұрын

@@Frankie2012channel No, two would work.

@tilmanrotationalinvariant2257

5 жыл бұрын

or u simply use a screen, just saying

@TorrenFilms

5 жыл бұрын

You most likely would not be able to do this as the mirrors would probably bounce unwanted light across the set, ruining the DOPs work

@Absolutely_puck_fakestine

5 жыл бұрын

With all the lighting used on a set that wouldn't be possible.

2:05 smokin the pipe lol. He is gandalf irl

That. Is phenomenal.

When ever something in life ever looks too large or too small, I always tell my friends "Maybe they lord of the rings'd it".

I still don't get how this shit works. It's literally like magic. Fuck sake.

@zamirstuff

8 жыл бұрын

+noptic That's why is called Movie Magic :D it's beautiful

@urmo345

8 жыл бұрын

+noptic when you watch movie there are more shots that makes you scratch the head, like the very beginning of LOTR where gandalf meets bilbo, not only height difference, but bilbo is movinf behind and front of gandalf figure and is taking items, hat and staff, from his hands.

@Miatpi

8 жыл бұрын

+urmo345 Maybe you already knew it, but they filmed them separately using motion control cameras and blue screen.

@urmo345

8 жыл бұрын

ut bilbo is movinf behind and front of gandalf figure and is taking items, hat and staff, from his hands.Miatpi

@ericd7709

8 жыл бұрын

+Miatpi Not separately - look again at 0:36

Wow. This is beyond incredible. I’m Legitimately mind blown by the level of technical skill and basic knowledge it takes to pull this off so well. for the last 15 years I’ve been watching the entire extended edition trilogy at-least 5-times a year but I’ve never watched the bonus features. all this time I thought it was computer tricks. This is ingenious. Gives you goosebumps.

I just pulled out my old LOTR dvd and watched it and I was wondering how the heck they did this specific scene. So glad this was the example they used. I wish they still worked this hard and made this sort of quality. It's so much better than CGI.

clearly filmmaking takes a lot of innovation, creativity and even some math/physics! so cool!

I swear it must have been an absolute privilege to be a part of the LOTR production, Everything, from the music, to the cast, to the cinematography to the enormous battles, they're all beautiful.

2:01 “Gandalf” utterly on his role sucking his pipe whilst none cameras are roling.

@kennarajora6532

3 жыл бұрын

as wise as a wizard.

These movies are timeless. There's just one small scene that comes to mind that looks a bit off now, almost 20 years after they were made. Incredible!

This is one of my favorite special effects in the movie.

This is simply one reason why these films will be cherished for many, many years to come.

Even after they explain the trick at length, it’s still seamless on scene. These are the men who built my childhood.

This is the real magic right here.

Like my girlfriend once said, " I liked it but it could've been longer. "

Oh my God, I had no idea this kinda stuff was involved, it all looks so seamless I barely thought about it. Practical effects never cease to amaze me.

I am in awe of the skills applied in making such excellent movies.

Sounds like a lot of work for a quick shot. the attention to detail in these movies is impressive

From now on, everytime I re-watch LOTR it will never be the same Damn the hobbits were actually talking to air lol

@kennarajora6532

3 жыл бұрын

there were a couple of scenes where the hobbits are talking to each other, there, forced perspective wouldn't be necessary.

I'm starting to see where this big mobile spending goes. Amazing, I had no idea so much work went into this scene. Bravo

Truly amazing, throughout the whole analysis I was amazed at its product but confused in the process, must of taken some physics and a keen eye to make this illusion

20+ years later I finally got around to finding out how they did it👏

Maaaan, making movies back then must've taken some real creativity. Nowadays, people just throw money at blockbusters until everything's done with CGI.

@Aurumai

5 жыл бұрын

To be fair, CGI --when not overused-- is a great tool for cutting the costs of filming certain scenes which would otherwise be impossible, either because of financial or technological constraints. There are many films today which use CGI in such extremely effective ways that the audience has no idea it's even there. In a lot of cases, there's really no reason NOT to use CGI since you can create a photorealistic scene for a mere fraction of the price of shooting in reality.

@BierBart12

5 жыл бұрын

@@Aurumai A shame so many CGI artists either suck at what they're doing because they only studied it because they thought it would be all easy, fun and games or aren't given nearly enough time because companies want to cut even more costs

@Aurumai

5 жыл бұрын

@@BierBart12 Not sure I really know what you're talking about. Most of the CGI in super popular movies today is top notch, albeit *waaaaay* overdone.

@benmcdonnell85

5 жыл бұрын

Aurumai Ye CGI allows for creating things in films thats just not possible practically, but Its a miss-conception though that CGI is cheaper then shooting practically.

@nuke97

5 жыл бұрын

airlockengage back in the days?? How old are you all? The LOTR movies had plenty of CGI put in use. This was just a tasteful choice of getting something done.

I love this because I dont have any idea what any of this means but you can tell these guys are excited about having figured this out and that makes me excited.

Way better than The Hobbit, imo

@Eoinster

9 жыл бұрын

That's not opinion. It's fact.

@Eoinster

9 жыл бұрын

Aaron Watson Don't be an *? Find a single person in the world who prefers the Hobbit. It's not subjective, it's an objectively better trilogy in every way. Is it not a fact that The Godfather is a better movie than The Last Airbender?

@USFighter

9 жыл бұрын

Eoinster I like the hobbit equally as much as LOTR... Now it's opinion.

@Eoinster

9 жыл бұрын

Hated Out Yo I like Troll 2 as much as Citizen Kane. That doesn't make the opinion valid.

@luf4rall

9 жыл бұрын

Eoinster you said "like", which makes it your opinion.

2:22 the shadow of his right hand (holding the tea pot) suddenly appears near the cup. One second before, there was only his left hand shadow.

The sheer amount of effort that went into making these movies is astounding.

I can't even wrap my head around this. Genius!

STuff like this is fascinating - but then again, it's kind of like magic, I don't always want to know how it's done.

@josegenuino5706

9 жыл бұрын

For me it's just makes allof this more incredible

@RIDDICK0911

9 жыл бұрын

José Genuino same. Knowing that it was a purely practical stuff makes it ever more awesome to behold.

This is what will always separate this absolute masterpiece of a movie from playstation cutscenes that are being passed off as movies these days

you can plainly see it's so much more fun and joyful in this clever way of doing it than just doing green screen with all the actors separated. that B roll of ian mckellen breaking down on the hobbit green screen set haunts me.

I've seen this video many times. Still blows my mind.

I use it in photography, very clever to use it in live action.. a lot of head scratching I bet..

"Do not take me for some conjurer of cheap tricks!"

@kennarajora6532

3 жыл бұрын

"I am not trying to rob you! I'm trying to help you."

Truly the genius of film makers, love this stuff sooo much!

This is one of those things that once you've chosen to do it in one scene, you just have to repeat it in all other scenes since the ratios otherwise would not make sense. Sounds like hell! Respect

Moral of watching: 2:26 It worked!

All that just to have the camera be moving for a few seconds talk about dedication

@30AndHatingIt

5 жыл бұрын

That’s why practical effects work gets more respect, it’s insane the amount of blood sweat and tears got poured into these films. Another great piece of practical effects work, Star Wars, they took 8 MONTHS to make something like a 10 second piece of footage.

@mycroft16

5 жыл бұрын

The wow effect from people who know about forced perspective is another reason they do it. The moment when peers realize, wait... this is forced perspective, but holy crap the camera is moving... how the hell did they do that?!

That's a pretty creative solution to a difficult problem. Perspective is a powerful tool when used correctly.

Holy amazeballs! This is amazing!

The harder/technically more difficult methods always ALWAYS yield better results.

@DVZM.

5 жыл бұрын

Believe me creating this with cgi would have been a thousand times more difficult at the time they filmed the movie.

Ha, I always thought they used real hobbits

THIS IS FRIGGIN GENIUS!!

this is actually incredible and wow, what innovative filmmaking to solve this problem practically.

Why is everyone shitting on CGI? Half the time you’re watching something with CGI you don’t even know it because it is done very well. I’ve been learning for four years and have still barely scratched the surface of what is possible. It’s an art of its own and has made things possible in film that would never be possible without it. Don’t get me wrong these practical effects are really cool and interesting but I don’t think a lot of people understand that the only reason CGI “saves time” is because HUNDREDS of people are working on it simultaneously and sometimes are even half of the crew

From the hand of who!? Don't leave me in suspense!

@scabbardfox476

8 жыл бұрын

Sauron.

Never could get into this series, but this is art, that was amazing to watch.

@mycroft16

5 жыл бұрын

If you ever get the chance, get the extended edition dvd set and watch the extras. No film has ever put together a better set of extras. There are literally hours upon hours of this stuff. How they scout for locations... how they decide costume looks, how they pre-viz, how they storyboard, how they do sound effects. And I'm not talking the usual dvd 2 minute fluff pieces. These are like documentaries. Also, the audio commentary tracks are priceless. There are 4 of them with different groups of actors, or director/tech etc. The stories and things they talk about are incredible. There were things they put in sets that will never be seen on camera, but were there for the actors to see and feel it was real.

the video I never knew I needed but absolutely do ❤

And now in The Hobbit they have "Gandalf" crying on a green room regretting taking the role back for such shitty cash grabbing trilogy.

@themesongman0017

10 жыл бұрын

You're wrong, just saying!

@joacareface

10 жыл бұрын

WertzOne Think he meant the "cash grabbing trilogy" part.

@guitarman0365

5 жыл бұрын

no he was crying because he is mostly a stage actor or a personal actor that thrives on being around the people he is supposed to be in a scene with. He had to do most of his scenes completely alone giving the illusion he was talking with others. That for him was incredibly lonely, and stressful as an actor without having others to play off of.

@RaiceGeriko

5 жыл бұрын

I don't blame him. And it's not really a lonely, thing I don't think. I think it just doesn't come out as authentic when you are supposed to be in dialogue with someone, and no one is there.

@mycroft16

5 жыл бұрын

You should probably realize that they did extensive use of green screen on LOTR as well. When Gandalf first enters bag end they used different sets and compositing. Bilbo and Gandalf weren't even in the camera together. It's not like LOTR didn't use CGI and green screen. The Hobbit definitely eschewed practical in favor of CG though and that is a shame. Though if you ask me a significantly larger problem is the ridiculous changes to the story.

re:View brought me here.

This has to be revolutionary, never nor heard anything like this before. Peter has always been heavy with practical effects, but this is a different level

When I look at their rig it looks like it wouldn't work right, but it does. Kudos to the people who figured this out!

It would have looked like crap in CGI! This was the time where CGI looked wonky!

@mishmashmedley

5 жыл бұрын

^cough^ _Legolas_ ^cough^

CGI destroys cinema! LOTR best! Modern movies all CGI....boring.

@HexadecibalVJ

7 жыл бұрын

The thing about CGI is it's best when you don't notice it's there. Properly done you can produce some simply stunning work with it, but the minute you notice it, it destroys the illusion.

@RemixedVoice

7 жыл бұрын

Adam Hickam The minute you notice practical effects it destroys the illusion too.

@HexadecibalVJ

7 жыл бұрын

Very true. I think people are just more hypersensitive to cgi artifacts now though. A blend is always best. Throw the eye for loops.

@hazeddon

7 жыл бұрын

Morgomir I hope you realize the irony of criticizing CGI for destroying cinema while praising lotr, a movie that won an award for one of the most photo realistic CGI characters at the time.

Amazing camera work

WOW, I never thought it was done this was. Very impressive!!

2000ish: Man this movie is so great, even with low technique the movies were produced perfectly 2019: Man if this movie doesn't bash on white people it won't be accepted by Hollywood

unbelievably brilliant

I don't know why, but I find all of the forced perspective stuff just SO impressive! So genius!

@Ken-fh4jc

8 ай бұрын

Because it looks so good and will always look good. Today it would be all CGI and look like shit.

Awesome!! Thanks for sharing 😀🕺🏻🎥🏖🇦🇺

So heartwarming to see this.

Brilliance at its BEST!

Amazing work

This was so seamless people didn’t even think about it at the time. TFOTR and TT should have won Academy Awards for this stuff, deserved it just as much as ROTK.

Wow! Now I know why did they look like, they don't look each other in the eye. Amazing!

Most amazing trilogy ever made and the compassion that went into it, if only peter jackson made more... id absolutely melt if i heard hes making silmarilion

10,000 hours of effort for a 3 second scene that could just as well have been shot in 10,000 other ways, but they went with the hardest one.

These movies really did showcase some next level film wizardry. It simply boggles my mind how someone spent the time to figure all of this out.

This is what love and care for a film and look at it? It doesn't look fake and it still is beautiful than the horrendous CGI

Wow, this is done SO WELL I can't see it even after being told what the trick is

Outstanding!

Stunning

Amazing, they worked so hard on this.