70s - 2000s - People so smart and able to work out the mathematics of orbital rotations. Working out the exact mathematics to send space crafts to distant planets. 2017 - The Earth is flat

@istvansipos9940

5 жыл бұрын

luckily, all the meteors hit Earth in the middle. Otherwise, she would be spinning like a coin tossed in the air.

@digitalandanalog

5 жыл бұрын

You didn't get the joke, did ya? Fucking dumb shit you are, eh? Maybe it is you who should stop wasting food, water and oxygen.

@R0B690

5 жыл бұрын

To make it clear for you, I dont believe the Earth is flat. Its a joke towards people that do.

@teebee5323

5 жыл бұрын

How many "flat earthers" work at NASA?

@jbenkidu

5 жыл бұрын

Your comment was surprisingly humorous, a marvel of achievements listed, then proceed to press "read more" -2017 flat earth.

Amazing Narrative !! Am all set today to teach Newton Laws, Kepler's, CP, CF, Tremendous lesson. Thank you !!!

Aristarchus Greek philosopher of Samos (310-230 BC) advanced the heliocentric model as an alternative hypothesis to geocentrism but the original text has been lost. A reference in Archimedes' book The Sand Reckoner (Archimedis Syracusani Arenarius & Dimensio Circuli) describes a work by Aristarchus in which he advanced the heliocentric model.

This came out in the late 80s and early 90s. I can tell by the DX-7 bell sounds and the graphics.

7:26 this brings 360 no-scope to a whole new level

@WvNTED

2 жыл бұрын

Legend 🤣

One of the best informative video I have ever seen in KZread. But highly technical.

@RichWoods23

5 жыл бұрын

If you think that's technical you should see the equations...

@petermarshall7352

5 жыл бұрын

Try the math; this video barely lays out the fundamentals. The equations to position the planets are really hundreds of thousands of equations put together.

@harshvardhan4771

2 жыл бұрын

@@petermarshall7352 Hi. I am inter in space sciences, but couldn't find anywhere to study orbital mechanics from. Can you please suggest a source which includes the maths you mentioned in your post?

Interesting stuff presented so the layman can understand it, Thanks 👍💨

@patrickmorand5189

5 жыл бұрын

inkitatus1 no such thing as s layman.. just lying masters, and stupid slaves.

Great video and very well explained. Still, I miss the geometric and mathematical description of the coverage zones in a similiar manner to the one done for the orbits, which is very good.

@AlirezaNabavian-eu6fz

7 ай бұрын

😢😢😢

That was amazing. Show me more please.

30:48 my home city of windsor ontario! South of the detroit river. Cant believe this photo. Must be old because it has really expanded now.

@nathanielthomas2502

4 жыл бұрын

Detroit baby

@nathanielthomas2502

4 жыл бұрын

Belle isle

@mohammadbazzi3072

3 жыл бұрын

from windsor too.

@mohammadbazzi3072

3 жыл бұрын

thnaks you. Windsor Is our City. yeah its bigger now. We got the Detroit next to us. NASA always loven Windsor always have us on the Map. Thank you NASA.

This video comes from a time when space science was available to the masses.

ok, I feel ready to play kerbel sapce progrma

@scarakus

6 жыл бұрын

KSP is a pain in the butt trying to rendezvous without cheating... lol

@brandonedwards1181

6 жыл бұрын

gets easier after 1000 hours :)

@ryanavery7980

6 жыл бұрын

or factorio

@SeedlingNL

5 жыл бұрын

Rendezvous isn't that hard... docking without a docking assist tool.. now that's torture...

@Reiflexx

5 жыл бұрын

Dido... until I learned some simple tips - now It's super easy & kinda boring now, to the point of the Docking assist tool now just gets in the way. Heres the Sequence... Steps 2-4 is the key to all of it. 1. Start at a 100m distance and zero out reletive speed between ships. 2. On both ships - Set docking ports as targets!!! 3. On both ships - Set MechJeb/SAS to always point ship at their targets (docking port always point at each other)!!! 4. USE your Nav Ball - Understand how your RCS thrusting moves your Prograde indicator so it lines up with target indicator (note: relying on the "magic following camera drone" aka external "cheat" view actually makes docking very difficult - using 2D perception to fine tune 3D movement & distance) 5. Now use RCS thruster to start a slow & steady (1-4 m/s) forward movement toward target. 6. As you close in, keep making RCS thrust adjustments to keep prograde & target indicator lined up. 8. Keep your eyes on the Nav Ball and target approach speed indicator. 9. Within 10m slow to under 0.5m/s ... and small RCS adjustments... and at 5m turn off SAS... and .... poof - you've docked.

I have watched this video 3 or 4 times now it is so amazing

@a.ielimba78

4 жыл бұрын

Convection 369 how the cycles continue, like poles shifting, like earth moving up or down. Like the Coriolis effect and exothermic and Endothermic convection. The fact that the momentums of polarity, eventually changed and continue in motion completing convection cycle. This zero point field or free energy basically like free falling towards the earth. If such a motion of speed happened with a embodiment. It would cause the embodiment to circle the earth in a stable orbit. As such all stable orbits like the earth around the sun or the sun around the galaxy. This spiraling notion of constant free energy movement dynamics, negative and positive inertia or forces which sustain the system.🔄☯️⚕☁️➿♾ Interesting intriguing, the stable orbit or free energy interval. Not to little to be left or to much to fly off just enough to keep circulating.

Wow, some really smart people are working with this knowledge to accomplish great things in space. It's amazing that people figured this out with mathematics and physics. Very impressive .

@quasi-intellecual3790

5 жыл бұрын

For some reason, I feel that you are being sarcastic

@wildernessfieldjournal8211

5 жыл бұрын

Definately not. This stuff is amazing. I barely understand it so I have a lot of respect for the people who figured it out and used it to travel through space.

Thanks, this was a great package of information!

I'm just gonna go sit in the corner and cry. My brain ran away watching this.

@davel7037

4 жыл бұрын

My brain couldn't comprehend when he started to talk about coordinate system of earth & satellite. May be watching again will help

@mandivvy

3 жыл бұрын

That’s intentional. They don’t want you to be able to make sense of it. They want you to just “trust the experts/science” instead of using your own common sense and seeking the truth for yourself. It’s all a lie.

@kylealexander7024

3 жыл бұрын

Thats good for u. Provides elasticity to ur thinking

I did wonder, with the moon despite being so far away has such a significant pull on our oceans and seas, how much does its gravity affect the satellites? The video describes it as orbital perturbations, but most satellites can actually re-align themselves without thrust/fuel?

@willoughbykrenzteinburg

5 жыл бұрын

It's important to understand WHY the moon's gravity effects the oceans. It's not necessarily the strength of the gravity that does it. It is the size of the Earth that creates the issue. The force of gravity gets weaker the farther you get from the source. For something the size of the Earth, that means the force of gravity is considerably stronger on the side of the Earth which faces the moon than the side opposite the moon. This VARIANCE in gravity is what causes tides. The moon pulls the waters because the force on the water (which is at the surface of the Earth) harder than the rest of the Earth. With something the size of a satellite, the force from the moon is the same on every part of that satellite so these tidal forces do not exist. There is however some variance in the force depending on where it is in orbit, but these variances are very small. They have a negligible effect, but technically SOME effect. Even Jupiter has a small effect. It is difficult to say exact what effect these things have because there are many factors involved, and probably the most significant is simply orbital decay due to the space in low Earth orbit not being a perfect vacuum, so any effects from the moon or Jupiter are dwarfed by the effects of drag - which in itself is very tiny. Even so, satellites do need periodic boosts to push them back into their desired orbits. There is no need to distinguish what factors caused what. They just look at the parameters as they are, and adjust them to what they need to be without much regard to what all factors went into causing the change in orbit. The vast majority of it is still just drag.

@ffggddss

5 жыл бұрын

"There is no need to distinguish what factors caused what. They just look at the parameters as they are, and adjust them to what they need to be without much regard to what all factors went into causing the change in orbit." True, spacecraft controllers don't much care what caused the drift; they just need to concentrate on getting the 'bird' back where it should be. But celestial mehanicians *do* care. And if I might amplify a bit, your explanation of tides; yes, tide (tidal gravitational force) is due to variations of gravitational force with position. [In mathematical technicality, it's the spatial gradient of the vector force of gravity; which makes it a tensor of rank 2.] And in the case of the Moon acting on Earth, it is not only stronger on the near end of Earth than the far end, it's also different in direction from side to side. The result is a stretching of our planet along the Earth-Moon line, together with a uniform compression in the plane perpendicular to that line, which is exactly half the magnitude of the stretching effect. So the overall distortion is actually volume-preserving. [The tensor is trace-free.] Also, if you calculate how much the tide should rise and fall due solely to tidal gravity of Moon (and Sun!), it comes out to a few cm. The several meters we actually see, and the huge variation in tidal amplitudes and times from one place on Earth to another (see Bay of Fundy) are due to the mobility of water vs the relative immobility of the sea floor. (The "solid" Earth does also distort due to tidal forces, but it doesn't flow hundreds to thousands of miles.) Absence of this explanation has been pointed out as a failing of even most physics teachers. Fred

Amazing how humans have made advances. Thanks for the video.

@mandivvy

3 жыл бұрын

Advances 😂🤣🤦🏻‍♀️

Thank you so much...at last I learnt these stuffs...

I wonder... how many flat-earthers use and _trust_ GPS navigation.....

@tripptt9

5 жыл бұрын

@@method2madnessofficial366 no...its not.

@winkyshy2

5 жыл бұрын

which city do i go to to sit on the edge of the earth so my legs dangle over the edge?

@annoyed707

5 жыл бұрын

Edgesittersburg, of course. :)

@dodgeuk69

5 жыл бұрын

Method 2 Madness shut up you fucking idiot

@philup6274

5 жыл бұрын

@@method2madnessofficial366 thanks for speaking truth

Excelent, where is the next episode of this video?

Thank you for the educational video. I have a question: Why when we place a Satellite into earth orbit (does not matter what orbit) The Satellite will eventually falls back into earth. Even if you place the Satellite in GEO Synchronous orbit, it will take million years but at end it will falls back into the earth. Then why planets don't fall into their Suns that they have been around it for billions and billions of years? Thank you in advance.

@coltonhulett3671

5 жыл бұрын

Ben Nosrati great question my friend. An object in motion tends to stay at motion. I’m not sure how much a satellite weighs but a planet could weigh billions and billions of pounds, there fore having more kinetic energy to continue orbiting than a satellite. Also our sun probably has way stronger orbital energy than our planet. (9 planets orbit the sun, earth only has the moon)

@orloification

5 жыл бұрын

also low-earth orbit is nowhere near out of the entirety of earth's atmosphere.. there is still some drag imposed on the craft.

@soaprahgermfrey3536

5 жыл бұрын

Planets are INSANELY massive, the Earth having a mass of 5.972×10^24 kg, so the force of drag due to solar wind or other planets would be extremely small and would take quite a while. There are also tidal forces from other planets and the Sun that will disturb Earths orbit but will also keep it in its currect orbit. The disturbances are currently very stable but in some billions of years Mercury will be ejected from the system and the perturbations will become more amplified and extreme as they were in the solar systems early days, many planetesimals being flung into high orbits and getting sucked into other planets or being shredded by tidal forces from Jupiter (think of the asteroid belt, which could have formed a planet but Jupiter's mass caused tidal forces to keep the bits from coagulating too much and actually formng a planet, but instead the dwarf planet Ceres). If anyone has any questions or this didn't make sense please let me know because I would love to try to help people understand this because I absolutely love astrophysics and I aim to earn a PhD in the field and there is nothing I love more than talking about space!!!

@ffggddss

5 жыл бұрын

+ Ben Nosrati: It's a matter of the numbers. Orbital decay in low and medium Earth orbits, depends on atmospheric density at the minimum altitude of the satellite. For simplicity's sake, let's restrict this to circular orbits. Atmospheric density drops exponentially with altitude, h, and the altitude difference to get half the density is something like 18,000 ft ≈ 5.5 km ≈ 3.4 miles. At h = 100 miles, I think the time to Earth-fall is measured in months. At h = 200 miles, atmospheric drag is so very much lower than at 100 mi, that other forces that were much tinier at 100 mi, start to become important. By the time you get to geosynchronous altitude, there's virtually no atmospheric drag, and it's a matter of gravitation from other Solar System bodies, and the Earth's magnetic field acting on any magnetic dipole moment the satellite might have, perturbing the orbit. I don't know what the expected life of a geosynchronous satellite is, absent any thrusts, but it's probably as you say, millions of years; maybe much longer. With the planets, which have had 4+ billion years to work on each other's orbits, the ones we are left with, are in orbits that are stable virtually forever. Current theory has a prediction horizon of somewhere in the realm of 100,000,000 years, beyond which prediction is impossible due to chaos theory. Interplanetary space, and the gas and solar wind particles in it, is so extremely sparse that it will have no effect on planetary orbits from now until the Sun blows off its outer layers, several billion years from now. Fred

@willoughbykrenzteinburg

5 жыл бұрын

Ben, the difference is drag. Things we put into Earth orbit are not technically completely out of the atmosphere. There is still a tiny bit of drag where they orbit, and this causes orbits to decay over time. It's a slow process, but nowhere near as slow as you are talking about (millions of years). Moons orbiting planets and planets orbiting the sun are in a virtual vacuum, so there is no drag on them - and as others have pointed out, they are WAY more massive than a satellite, so any tiny amount of drag just doesn't accelerate them like it would a satellite.

I love how the universe uses gravity to hold everything together and how it's the same force that subtracts things out of the universe

@nikhildeshmukh6851

4 жыл бұрын

Keep balance in the universe.

@micro_aggressor

3 жыл бұрын

Its a vacuum.

@manifold1476

3 жыл бұрын

Bullshit. Learn a bit about electricity and magnetism and you'll learn something about what holds things together. Learn a bit more and you'll find that DARK ENERGY IS NOT GRAVITY!!

@TerryJLaRue

2 жыл бұрын

@@manifold1476 You are correct. Dark energy is certainly not gravity. In fact, it acts more like anti-gravity. Gravity accelerates masses toward each other, whereas dark energy accelerates masses like galaxies away from each other. It will be very interesting when science is able to tell us what gravity, dark matter and dark energy really are and how they work.

And we spin in a spiral galaxy so the corkscrew reality as we follow the sun..... evolved reality needs to be taught so people can understand what exactly life is

@WJV9

5 жыл бұрын

The helical spiral that the planets follow while orbiting the sun does not affect the orbits of satellites around the earth enough to affect this discussion of orbital mechanics. That topic is more advanced and would needlessly complicate the discussion since it has a very small effect on earth-satellite orbits.

The notion that the Earth revolves around the Sun (Heliocentric mode) had been proposed as early as the 3rd century BC by Aristarchus of Samos...

@ZackWolfMusic

5 жыл бұрын

And before that earth was known to be flat sense humans been on earth. In the 2nd and 3 rd century scientists and astronomers took what the Greeks told them about earth and changed it to heliocentric globe earth which is a model not a real example of earth.

@benmmbk765

2 жыл бұрын

Even that was some knowledge, for that time. Man learned MORE in the later days, gradually.

@salvalooez2249

2 жыл бұрын

The Mayan had all the this figured out 6000 years as well

When I learned this stuff, way back when dinosaurs still roamed the planet, we didn't have these videos. We had to imagine it.

Anyone knows the music at 4:00 ? Or the name/authors of the documentary? ..I can't find it anywhere..

@JacekNasiadek

29 күн бұрын

Warren Bennett - Dream the Future Other musical tracks that have been used in this documentary: Kerry Beaumont - Molecules Kerry Beaumont - Creation I Vic Sepanski - Ultrasonic Waves

@KevinS47

29 күн бұрын

@@JacekNasiadek Oh my god!!!! Thank you so much!!!! I am so excited to finally know what song that was, I did so much research trying to find it, it's been a mystery for the longest time (since 2019 when I first watched this) and I even went as far as trying to re-create it myself at some point (while I did get the general vibe/outline, it wasn't quite right). Thank you so much Jacek! I am curious as to know how you know these tracks!

@KevinS47

29 күн бұрын

@@JacekNasiadek Also, another funny little coincidence is that I have JUST turned notifications for comments back on 2 days ago (after more than 6 years having them off); so I would not have seen your reply unless I had turned them back on completely by coincidence the other day... life is weird sometimes.

@JacekNasiadek

29 күн бұрын

@@KevinS47 The way I identify music in videos is I record the part in which the music plays with Audacity, save it as a file, then upload it to a website for identifying music. I can't post a link on YT but there are several such services that are easy to find.

@KevinS47

29 күн бұрын

@@JacekNasiadek ah what! I tried to use Shazam, Siri and google music recognition apps, none of the 3 worked (I tried relentlessly haha); anyway, thank you for that, I really appreciate it!! :)

Thanks you Sir

Witchcraft!! Demon speak! (Forming hex signs and covering my eyes...) Honestly, I think of the folks that compute orbital values, and those calculating intercept calculations for long distance flight, as unadulterated geniuses. Seriously, this is WAY above my comprehension. Good job people! (just sitting here stirring dirt in my clay pot).

In regards to the 6 orbital elements I guess the "time of perigee passage" has been replaced by the "specific angular momentum"?

great vidio, I wish you happy day.

Muy interesante 30-8-2018

Love this video and his voice. Kepler laws of motion, memory of old awesome high school days!

Knowledge meets wisdom. ✨️ excellent teaching

Hi master is there really an amikus planet?

@MrKmanthie

6 жыл бұрын

NO.

anyone know where the music is from at around 2:30? It gives me heavy nostalgia

@KevinS47

4 жыл бұрын

I also would like to know, if I just knew the name of the documentary..

@JacekNasiadek

29 күн бұрын

Warren Bennett - Dream the Future Other musical tracks that have been used in this documentary: Kerry Beaumont - Molecules Kerry Beaumont - Creation I Vic Sepanski - Ultrasonic Waves

@ilqrd.6608

29 күн бұрын

@@JacekNasiadek Thank you!!!

"The ancients believed that the earth is flat" My classmate is very ancient

Very interesting, I learned a lot. Thanks

Can you cite where you get the the notion that "the ancients believed the Earth to be flat"?

@davejacobsen3014

6 жыл бұрын

Pariah Sojourner Prophet Muhammad seemed to have thought that the sun went somewhere when it set, and that somewhere was below the throne of Allah. Yet in reality the sun is actually not setting, but rather the Earth is rotating in a certain way so that it seems to be setting. So at that time in Arabia it was believed the earth was flat.

@declanp1

6 жыл бұрын

ancient Greeks knew the earth was a sphere over 2,500 years ago.

@mohammedp.m3988

5 жыл бұрын

Verse of the Holy Qur’an , from Surah Al-Anbiya, Ch. No. 21, V. No. 33… That it is Allah, who has created the nights and the day…each one travelling in a orbit, with its own motion.

@CharlesStarbuck

5 жыл бұрын

+Montz Roberts If YOU"RE going to insult someone's intelligence, you should probably should double check YOUR grammar when doing so.

@CharlesStarbuck

5 жыл бұрын

+Montz Roberts You are a moron. You're a moron. Your intelligence is that of a moron. I'm not currently in grade 2 but I did know the correct use of your and you're by then.

Vacuum effortless any effect while gravity is everything around the satellites and planets. I believe that there'd take into consideration since masses are also into movement so vacuum should work together within awhile distant universe.

Great video. Thumbs up 👍

I have always wondered if it was possible for a lunar orbiter to "slam" into the moon by simply staying in one place along the moon's path around the Earth until the moon completed an orbit?

@artgutierrez6568

4 жыл бұрын

@Kit Canyon ok, that part I get. Perhaps I should have worded it better. But let's say it is a shuttle or a rocket instead of an orbiter. The rocket stays in one place directly along the moon's orbit until the moon comes back around. At that point, would the rocket then "slam" into the moon even though it was stationary the whole time?

@willoughbykrenzteinburg

4 жыл бұрын

@@artgutierrez6568 What is your understanding of how orbits work?

An actual factual on KZread. I am pleased.

Must watch again another trillions and trillions times to begin to get a glimpse of some kind of inchoate sense...will therefore visit again now I need a long long repose....Thanks .

@manifold1476

3 жыл бұрын

Watch over and over again, so you can misunderstand at a deeper level? Ha.

0:16 ancients in the western countries. India always believed earth was round, that's why earth is called "bhugol" in Hindi. Bhu means earth, gol means round.

@krishna_3451

4 жыл бұрын

Yes bro 😀

@ravimenon511

4 жыл бұрын

In tamil 'Bhugolam' means geography. Am I right?

@devilisahomo

4 жыл бұрын

Your dinner plate is also round. That doesn't mean it's a sphere?

@sumeertuli

4 жыл бұрын

@@devilisahomo don't be jealous. Accept the fact and be quiet.

@devilisahomo

4 жыл бұрын

@@sumeertuli I'm going to enjoy this. Whats this fact you speak of? I'll logically dismantle it for you so I hope your fact is good enough to stop me from doing that

What decides how close a planet orbits to the sun? For example sometimes you see a planet like Jupiter close to the sun and sometimes you see a planet like Jupiter orbit far away depending on the star system? How does that happen?

@willoughbykrenzteinburg

5 жыл бұрын

www.quora.com/Why-do-gas-giant-planets-not-form-closer-to-their-star

@ichich3978

3 жыл бұрын

2 things: First how fast is the planet second how heavy is the star

@alexandergalitevstudentfvh8696

11 ай бұрын

the position and speed. or, for a single variable, the orbital period.

Anyone knows the MUSIC at 2:30 or 4:00 ?! It's lovely! =)

@JacekNasiadek

29 күн бұрын

Warren Bennett - Dream the Future Other musical tracks that have been used in this documentary: Kerry Beaumont - Molecules Kerry Beaumont - Creation I Vic Sepanski - Ultrasonic Waves

still best documentary than other high graphical dumb docs

Is this the voice of Carl Sagan? Is it from Cosmos: A Personal Voyage, or another documentary?

Excellent video.

16:00 We cant orbit at specific latitude? We must pass to ecuator line?

@spatrk6634

Ай бұрын

you can, its just that launching from equator due east is going to use more inertia of earths rotation to get into orbit easier. so its more efficient launching from equator. if you dont want to orbit specific latitude

@JacekNasiadek

29 күн бұрын

The orbital plane must intersect the center of mass of the object being orbited.

Question how do you post videos with no internet?

@adamthefractal9960

5 жыл бұрын

You don't. And this is obviously not a problem for you seeing as you have posted this message.

Your video help a lot for my semester exams😍😁🤣

It's clarify half of my doubts in satellite orbit. Thanks alot.

I learnt so much from this.

Heliocentric model of Solar System is correct in Physics and Astronomy

👍🏼

When was this made? English units? The space shuttle? The Soviet Union?

@ZeeCaptainRon

Жыл бұрын

Do you think that the laws of physics changed from 1990 to now? The math remains the same.

thanks thanks :D

GREAT DAY I WAS KINDA OF THINKING THE SAME THING AS THE NARRATOR WAS SPEAKING. ENJOY MORE

pov you randomly got suggested this now we’re both here

A gem.

14:13 what the hell is up with New Zealand on the map?

Woww...it gives detailed explanation

Who here is doing his thesis on flat earth mechanics?

👏👏👏

can my paper plane applied to this

I don't get it. Why do flat Earthers even click on this video??? I KNOW baseball is real. I just find it stupid, so I don't watch it. flat Earthers kinda "know" that this is NOT real + they find this whole thing stupid and yet, they watch these videos

@geoffdutton9632

5 жыл бұрын

Because JewTube keeps putting it in our AutoPlay list

@Astronomynatureandmusic

5 жыл бұрын

I think 80% of these guys are trolls. The other 20% may have a need for opposing something. Lots of people get energy from actively opposing something. That is actually a strength, in my view; however, using one's strengths just to get people mad just adds to nothing.

@jbenkidu

5 жыл бұрын

They trying to help the degenerates.

@Geckobane

5 жыл бұрын

Flat Earthers are like cold sores. They show up unexpectedly and are universally reviled.

What is AD...

Mrs Richards: "I paid for a room with a view!" Basil: (pointing to the lovely view) "That is Torquay, Madam ." Mrs Richards: "It's not good enough!" Basil: "May I ask what you were expecting to see out of a Torquay hotel bedroom window? Sydney Opera House, perhaps? the Hanging Gardens of Babylon? Herds of wildebeest sweeping majestically past?..." Mrs Richards: "Don't be silly! I expect to be able to see the sea !" Basil: "You can see the sea, it's over there between the land and the sky." Mrs Richards: "I'm not satisfied. But I shall stay. But I expect a reduction." Basil: "Why?! Because Krakatoa's not erupting at the moment ?"

can something just sit still at a distance from a mass? basically can a moon just sit still in a gravity field from a planet? why does it always circle the planet and can’t it sometimes just sit still at a fixed distance away without circling it?

@adaptablerubenvideos3097

Жыл бұрын

Gravity attracts evething not matter how far away so if the obkect sits with 0 relative velocity to another object they will ventually crash because of that. So they need to move to not crash

@alexandergalitevstudentfvh8696

Жыл бұрын

it cannot sit still, gravity would pull the moon inwards. by moving sideways fast enough that pull turns into sideways motion itself.

@millicentsmallpenny5837

Ай бұрын

People tend to think that when things are "in space" they are "weightless", this is not a fact. For instance if you are at the altitude of the ISS you weigh 88% of what you do on earth at sea level. The ISS stays on orbit because it is also moving laterally at about 17000 mph so as it falls toward earth it also misses hitting the earth and simply orbits the earth. If you went straight up to 240 miles high, and stopped, you would start falling and hit the earth again , moving at thousands of miles per hour

That's the power of math!

Thanks a lot 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍✨✨✨✨✨

Aryabhatta proved for the first time that one day of earth is about 24 hr

@ffggddss

5 жыл бұрын

That must've taken some doing, seeing how the hour is *defined* as 1/24 of a mean solar day. Fred

Very informative. Thanks for posting.

Why stewie griffin is reading Newton’s laws?

Nice

You absolutely forgot to credit NASA for that video...

look up the definition of Theory. Theorist.

@ZackWolfMusic

5 жыл бұрын

Made up

@ZackWolfMusic

3 жыл бұрын

@Francisco @Francisco You can't spell right so can't say who is intelligent or not when you can't spell correctly! Obviously you're in denial what I said. And there is no need to have certifications to prove Sciencetist are lieing all it takes is critical thinking to jduge what Scientists is saying is true or not! You obviously lack critical thinking and believe too much in the main stream narrative..

Ancient Indians allready know before aristatil and Western scientist ...thosend of years back Indians know the ,, navagraha which meant nine planet orbital and they strongly believe Surya Sun is the center of planet

@RichWoods23

5 жыл бұрын

How did they determine that there were nine planets?

@dr.k.durgaprasad2125

5 жыл бұрын

@@RichWoods23 during their period they done lots of experiments by scientifically and Spiritual, manner. Fortunately they succeed to prove so many things.... I'm not discriminate against western scientis.... We are just bloody humans...

@loyallall

5 жыл бұрын

INFERIORITY COMPLEX IN THE SHAPE OF SUPERIORITY COMPLEX

@dr.k.durgaprasad2125

5 жыл бұрын

@@loyallall I thing so you are suffering with general anxiety disorder or schizophrenia

@karlderhammer5628

5 жыл бұрын

Well, not exactly: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navagraha

how planet rotate the sun? what is the reason of rotation? is planet axis is motor or orbit is track where planet most go on this imaginary circle line? and why sun does not rotate? honestly i dont know anything?

@acidage

4 жыл бұрын

Richard Dawkins disliked your comment.

@Ngoge4024

4 жыл бұрын

@Hal 9000it's not about ignor neither my inability.. if u have a good knowledge than explain me why sun doesn't rotate.? Iam just shock man.

@alexandergalitevstudentfvh8696

11 ай бұрын

1. planets orbit other objects because they move sideways as the object pulls on them, cancelling out the sideways momentum but now the downwards pull is sideways itself. rinse and repeat. 2. no reason, not everything has reason to it, they have causes but not reasons. 3. trajectories are not constant, they change all the time. 4. it does, you can track this using sunspots.

We are all riding this space turd together so just watch the dang video 😂🤣

Super.voice.

The gravity stuff is wrong. Else, big space bodies would be crashing into each other. Electromagetism is the key to keep them in space. But we have learned that an incorrect conclusion in science isn't necessarily useless.

@mikedelhoo

5 жыл бұрын

+Bob Owen Gravity makes 'big space bodies' orbit each other perpetually in elliptical orbits, for the most part.

@alexandergalitevstudentfvh8696

11 ай бұрын

the electric universe is false. do not enter academic discussion with this dogma.

Nice. Science explained via Tomahawk cruise missile clips and animations of a giant firing a rifle. Way to go! Hu Ra let's Kill Kill Kill as there's no better way to explain physics.... :(

@PhoenixTroy1976

5 жыл бұрын

Interesting documentary for bachelor students otherwise. And remember - war is not the solution to the problems we face in the 21st century. Peace.

can someone tell me why venus spins the opposite way to all the other planets and whether the moon spins at all ?

@willoughbykrenzteinburg

5 жыл бұрын

There is no consensus on why Venus spins the opposite way. The most common hypothesis is that it doesn't spin the opposite way; there was just a collision of some sort that knocked Venus upside down. Other hypotheses include tidal forces from the sun. Yes, our moon spins, but since it is tidally locked with Earth, the rotational period is equal to its orbital period (which is the case for most moons in the solar system).

@NOT_SURE..

5 жыл бұрын

@@willoughbykrenzteinburg thanks for that , venus getting flipped over makes sense but i still think the moon doesnt spin, if it did there would be no dark side , different countries on the earth would see a different view of the moon , surely?

@willoughbykrenzteinburg

5 жыл бұрын

@@NOT_SURE.. the moon most certainly spins. We see the same side because for every degree of rotates, it has traveled around in orbit that same amount. If you were on the moon, the sun and stars would rise and set just like on Earth. Just everyy 27.3 days or so. It is rotating for certain. The moon doesnt have a dark side. The side of the moon we never see gets just as much light as the side facing us.

@petermarshall7352

5 жыл бұрын

Venus somehow is upside down, that’s all. Technically, it may not be. We can’t see the actual body. The clouds may just be going that way.

@petermarshall7352

5 жыл бұрын

There is no dark side of the moon.

I am too high to get that but the music is dope

Well this made sense more than flatspacers and flatearthers believe, but still limited on their understandings of Gravity and Magnetism. I don't think human's have the capacity to comprehend the idea there could be an Implosion field near the center of their planet causing acceleration with lagforce that causes weight when not in the state of Free Fall. It is nessisary to have this attracting implosion field to pull on moon's and planet's with an outwards force also from their circular motions in order to have an elliptical orbit path. So the differential between orbit and rotation would cause the "g"constant:(Orbit÷(Rotation×2))= "g". And so: (Orbit÷(Rotation×g))=d. The rate the sun's pull is diverted to the center of earth to pull on it's surface of the planet as an implosion field with acceleration who's lagforce causes weight.

@alberttorres4917

5 жыл бұрын

It has taken a very long time and man hasn't figured thiis out yet. It's because theories are a mental block.

Thanks.i need to watch again and again and more again to understand it a bit...

Isaac Newton sounds like Stewie Griffin.

Some fools still believe that earth is flat...!

@paradigmshift7095

4 жыл бұрын

Naveen Kumar why are they fools?

@southtonorth-original

4 жыл бұрын

@@paradigmshift7095 what else they are....!!??

@willoughbykrenzteinburg

4 жыл бұрын

@@paradigmshift7095 Never in the history of the world has a fool recognized himself as such.

@omen5055

4 жыл бұрын

It is easier to fool someone than to convince them that they have been fooled.

Oh that Kepler...

Orbit is king of universe!

A.A.V.R.V.B! H,elov! Love Baysun.Love AQSH.

How do we know that it is not possible to go in space? If we never been there? (According flat earth person)

13:41 UFO 👽

Educational as fuuuuck.

Holy moly talking bout a high school flashback 🤯

Does any flat earth person can explain to me why all those mathematics calculation work perfectly in a round planet? Do you have same explaination for a flat earth?

7:30 seconds in.... Headshot....just saying lol