Inb4 someone writes "BUT THERE'S SPEED RECORD OF OVER 300 Tbps!" Yes. That's a controlled environment data transmission (pretty sure it's not IP or even ethernet) performed with lab equipment, not available commercially. Not something you could browse internet on.

I love how he said "Supposedly confidential" and proceeded to show the "confidential" stuff

@DCTekkie

6 ай бұрын

Disrespect NDA's all day everyday 😂

Great video and explaination

Incredible job! So neat!

This is amazing, how in the world does this only have a thousand views ??

@DCTekkie

2 ай бұрын

Do I have news for you my friend, we've hit 2k views 😄

@NemoTLS

2 ай бұрын

Rightfully so :D

nice to see it has built in USB-C on internal SSD at 1:25. really makes life easier.

@DCTekkie

6 ай бұрын

I know, right? They also had 3,5'' SSD's with 20 or 30TBs in capacity. Much faster to just take such drive with you rather to send it over 1 or 10gbit network

@ziiisu8127

6 ай бұрын

Wow 30TBs per SSD? That's crazy. Still can't believe the storage technology is improving this rapidly

Loved it! I could watch you talk about anything. Keep up the good work

@DCTekkie

6 ай бұрын

Thank you! I really appreciate the support and I'm glad you enjoyed the video. It means a lot to me!

Love your content! Keep it up!!

@DCTekkie

6 ай бұрын

Hey, thanks for the encouragement!

nice to put a face to the voice. you can't hear baldness or specs apparently.

@DCTekkie

6 ай бұрын

it's the result of doing 100 sit-ups, 100 pushups, 100 squats, and a 6.2-mile (10-km) run every day for three years

I need to quickly share 16TB...

@DCTekkie

6 ай бұрын

You'd be surprised how often that's the problem, sharing 16TiB over 1Gbit link takes around 40 hours :d

This is fascinating. Please do get into the details more.

@DCTekkie

6 ай бұрын

Is there anything you'd like to hear more in particular? :)

So cool. What a complex network tho haha! Probably more so even than some small - medium scale datacenters :)

@DCTekkie

6 ай бұрын

Well, yes and no :) For example, some would argue that deploying EVPN-VXLAN for basically 4 leaves and one layer of spines in between is overkill, and they'd be right. But here, in SCinet it's mostly about showing off that "yes, you can", even in a multivendor architecture

@hariranormal5584

6 ай бұрын

@@DCTekkie but I'm a 'lil bit confused, wasn't compatibility like this always common? Even like 20 years ago people wouldn't use same vendors for routers.

@DCTekkie

6 ай бұрын

It depends. Even basic stuff like MTU can be understood differently in config depending on a vendor, sometimes 9000 != 9000. Now, you have EVPN/VXLAN which is few techs stacked on top of each other, implemented independently by each company. It turns out that one vendor can process BGP updates a bit differently. For edge routers doing eBGP, sure, you can have different vendors, but you're using mostly standard BGP. But here this network does interesting things within iBGP.

@hariranormal5584

6 ай бұрын

@@DCTekkie Interesting. How did you learn network OS's if I may ask? I only have a paper understanding of them and would like to learn more about vendors like Arista, Cisco, or juniper

@DCTekkie

6 ай бұрын

@@hariranormal5584 You can get Arista vEOS for free from their website and launch it within GNS3. Cisco and Juniper I dealt with either at work or at uni. The rest was new to me when i started doing SCinet