every time a physicist divides by zero a singularity gets its wings

@nickduplaga507

Жыл бұрын

Time is perspective based. Universe sees you hit 0 aging, while you see universe not hit any limit, and can continue seeing the universe aging into infinity. 5th dimension wee. Then you return to universe time, the universe hasn’t seen you age at all, and you repeat events now in universe time, and change them. Deja vu… Time slip wee.

@AleatoricSatan

Жыл бұрын

You have the most enjoyable username! 🧬🐱

@TripleEightss

Жыл бұрын

what the fuck

@Ghryst

Жыл бұрын

@@AleatoricSatan and a much more enjoyable pussy. white pussies are the best

@BigGringus

Жыл бұрын

Attaboy, Clarence

I just wanted to address a very common (and natural) misunderstanding some people are having! Lots of people think that what was creates was just a simulation of a black hole's singularity, but this is so much more than that. It's a bit of a read so buckle up! Disclaimer: I have spent a lot of time trying to understand this, but my own field of study only brushes up against quantum mechanics, so someone who is academically active in the field may be able to point out some inaccuracies in my explanations. There's two very natural misconceptions that lead to the idea that what they produced was not an "actual" wormhole, but just a simulation. The first misconception is that a wormhole only refers to the Einstein-Rosen bridge from the ER paper, which describes a theoretical wormhole created by the extreme curvature of spacetime in a black hole. The second misconception is from the fact that nobody does a very good job at explaining what a quantum computer actually is, and the fact that they are called 'computers' lends itself to the incorrect but understandable assumption that they are just simulating something. I'll tackle these misconceptions in order: ===WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE EINSTEIN ROSEN BRIDGE=== General relativity is probably the single most successful theory in all of physics. It describes space and time not as two separate things, but as a unified four-dimensional spacetime - and most importantly for this discussion, this spacetime has a bad habit of bending and skewing in the presence of concentrated, non-moving energy - or as we call it, mass. After they were mathematically proven to exist, black holes caused some issues, because the math that proves that the *must* exist, also completely stops working once you get to the singularity. The ER paper mentioned in this video proposed a very mathematically beautiful solution to this problem: Based on the foundation that spacetime can curve and distort, instead of concentrating energy to an infinitely small, infinitely dense point that messes everything up, a singularity must instead connect with another point in distant spacetime. This is what we usually think of as a wormhole, and one might mistakenly call an "actual" wormhole. However, I think we can all agree that *anything* that connects two points of distant spacetime would be a wormhole, so if you could create one through some OTHER mechanism, it would still be a wormhole - would it not? Up until recently, there was no reason to believe that there was another method through which an ER-bridge could be created through which something could move, so it would seem pointless to make the semantic point I just made above. In the EPR paper referenced in the video, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, not content with the seeming violations of causality that quantum entanglement caused, proposed wormholes as a possible explanation for this supposed faster-than-light transmission of information - but as this bridge would not be able to move macroscopic systems across space and time, so it seems like a different idea, so it seems open and shut that you cannot have a real wormhole without gravitation. This is why the discovery of Dr. Maldacena in 1997 (4:56) and subsequent discoveries - that is, the theory of ER=EPR is so huge. It's incredibly complicated, and even if I was capable of explaining it all, this is all brand new physics that hasn't been fully fleshed out - but what it comes down to is that not only can entangled systems on a very small scale display properties *similar* to the wormholes in a black hole, they are exactly the same phenomenon. That means that wormholes are not just a phenomenon of gravity, but in fact a phenomenon of quantum mechanics, and that it should be possible to create a wormhole by entangling quantum particles on a smaller scale. So now we know that (if ER=EPR) we can create a wormhole by using entangled quantum particles in the right way... That sounds hard. Now what? Enter Dr. Spiropulu and her team. ===WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH QUANTUM COMPUTERS=== Quantum mechanics is complicated to say the least, so I'm going to assume you've made yourself familiar with some of the basics of it - at the very least, the idea of quantum superposition, i.e. that quantum particles can only be described in terms of where they might be according to a probability function, until "measured" - aka, until they become entangled with you, the observer. This is important. What quantum computing does is that it weaponizes these properties. It's extremely easily to accidentally interfere with a quantum particle and thus collapse its waveform, eliminating its quantum mechanical properties - but if you can avoid that by minimizing any direct or indirect interaction with it, by removing any air and supercooling the system down to superconductive temperatures, you can send an electron or photon through a hell of an obstacle course, basically a "circuit", and only collapse its waveform at the end, producing a quantum interference pattern that tells you every single way it could get through that circuit. In a way the famous double slit experiment is the first ever quantum computer, which asked the simple question "what different ways can a photon get through two slits" - and if you measured ahead of time which slit it passed through, you are zeroing in on a different, but related question: Of the ways a photon can pass through two slits, what subset of them involves passing through this one particular slit? It's not a particularly helpful question to ask if you're trying to compute something, but it IS a very helpful question if you're trying to understand the fundamental nature of quantum mechanics. See, that's what a quantum computer does: It is not a simulation of quantum systems, it is a system to *build* a more complex quantum system without collapsing the waveform, and then to observe the probability space that emerges. ===IN CONCLUSION === So what does all this mean for this video? To summarize, when they say they built a wormhole in a quantum computer, they don't mean they simulated a black hole. They mean they worked with Google Quantum to physically build a quantum system which was theorized to produce a wormhole and send an electron or photon (In this case an electron) through the system in such a way that it would create one interference pattern (probability space) if it traveled through a wormhole, and a different one if it didn't - and when the dust settled and they got the quantum system stable and looked at the interference pattern, it showed that they had in fact *physically created a quantum system wherein an electron passed through a wormhole*. So, in conclusion, I hope this convinces you that they did, in fact, create a quantum wormhole right here on earth :) P.S. There's a lot of other things going on here. For example, this whole thing about De Sitter space. I can't get into it now, but this is all consistent with expectations, and unfortunately does mean that we're probably not going to be zooping across spacetime through wormholes anytime soon. Still though, it's very cool.

@alonsolopez1396

Жыл бұрын

Really good explanation!

@gshaindrich

Жыл бұрын

@Zren the problem is not that there is a misunderstanding of what a wormhole is, but that it was a extremely siplified "simulation" in an "computer" with a computational power that rivals a pocket calculator of the 80s. They had to massively simplify the simulation, like doing brain surgery with a rubber on a drawn stick man. It if you don´t get the expected results, you tweak your simulation for many months till it does? Is that a valid scientific method in other areas? I don´t think so. Do F1 teams simulate their cars by playing mario cart? No, they don´t! Read your own "conclusion". You can´t write it without using words like "thoerized" and "probaility" - this means in conclusion that what they were doing is nothing more than THEORETICAL physics. No proof for irl!

@-Gnarlemagne

Жыл бұрын

@@gshaindrich Everything about this is theoretical physics. The existence of Black Holes is technically still only theoretical, even if we have a huge amount of evidence at this point! And the existence of wormholes in them is DEFINITELY theoretical. Theories are powerful things, and all of what we accept to basically be factual in modern physics is classified as a theory, because it is difficult to prove anything outright, but evidence points strongly to it being correct. The same is true here. They cleverly used neural network approaches because of the physical limits of the quantum systems that can be built right now, but the premise was to follow theory to create a quantum system that opened a bridge in spacetime - if the theories had no basis in reality, no amount of "tweaking the settings" would have produced the result they got. This is because, as I said in my original post, they did not SIMULATE a wormhole, they CREATED one on a quantum scale.

@cosmictreason2242

Жыл бұрын

@@-Gnarlemagne so does this permit FTL communication, if not travel?

@rememarshall2535

Жыл бұрын

Really fantastic and digestible explanation.

Surely the Caltech folks did not produce an actual wormhole but a quantum system that exhibits properties of a gravitational wormhole 😉

@curiodyssey3867

Жыл бұрын

Try watching the video bud.

@hastar72

Жыл бұрын

Why? This is hardly news and the title is extremely misleading. As was the reporting on the Nature article.

@sergioreyes298

Жыл бұрын

@@curiodyssey3867 I did, and the conclusion I came to is that a model (a "virtual reality" construct) was calculated in which, mathematically, a qubit of information managed to traverse a "model" of a wormhole. Please explain what is wrong with this interpretation. In my mind, a "real", physical particle, would be able to traverse a real, physical wormhole, which this was not. I am not a mathematician nor a physicist, but this interpretation is the only one that seems to make sense to me.

@septopus3516

Жыл бұрын

this is just sensationalism. This experiment is no more than a delayed choice experiment, where we have already observed that information propagated faster than speed of light. This is not new physics or science. This is just new engineering... No, a wormhole wasn't created. It's just entanglement has properties that keeps unitarity intact.

@wisdomsnap8695

Жыл бұрын

@Sergio Reyes the entire last section addressed that so top reply could be saying, "oh yeah, thanks for repeating the argument in the video like a gotcha" It wasn't inviting a re explanation of the last section of the video.

I wonder how fast the pulse traveled though as I would imagine that it would shed light on whether or not this is a higher dimensional wormhole or a pseudo wormhole in which the pulse at best is still traveling through 3d space at the speed of light.

@angerbob9665

Жыл бұрын

more likely the 2nd one :/

@doomguy9458

Жыл бұрын

Wut

@JackAdamCarter

Жыл бұрын

Would love to get an answer for this

@bigdaddynero3497

Жыл бұрын

He made no indication that the wormhole didn't occupy actual space. In which case, all they did was move a qubit through a tube such as toothpaste in a toothpaste tube. Very unremarkable and essentially useless.

@luciethart

Жыл бұрын

A higher dimensional wormhole? Yeah, if we could detect different dimensions in any way, shape or form I think you'd know about it. No, it's not what a wormhole is and that's not how a wormhole works as far as "our" understanding of physics go. There's no concrete evidence of other dimensions, only very incomplete speculations. We generally can't even agree on what model "time" fits into.

Only understood about 35% of that, but I hope this is as significant as it sounds.

@InTrancedState

Жыл бұрын

It's not. Check out Sabine hossenfelder

@afedorchak77

Жыл бұрын

@@InTrancedState it is, naming a german physicist doesnt change the experiments results lmfao not to mention she sits and says how Cannabis is a placebo for pain. When no, no its not lol so idk what your point is

@Underground247

Жыл бұрын

Yes and no, the wormholes are still not achievable to be used as the black holes would destroy the matter before it transfers its information through a black hole.

@andsalomoni

Жыл бұрын

They run a simulation on a quantum computer (which only makes computations). It is not even an "experiment", just computations. No actual "wormhole" at all.

@afedorchak77

Жыл бұрын

@@andsalomoni you clearly didn’t read the experiment in its entirety cause if you did you would say any of this lmao

Thank you for explaining and visualizing this in a way that was easy to understand. I will be subscribing for more content.

oh look we made a wormhole inside a computer, a very human controlled environment

@plunntic

Жыл бұрын

Nope, it was not `inside` a computer. They've used a quantum computer because it's a useful device to entangle real-world particles (this is what a quantum computer does, after all). That's what the video says, anyway.

@simplex7096

Жыл бұрын

@@plunntic proof???

@plunntic

Жыл бұрын

​@@simplex7096 watch the video again and/or ask the author, i've just wrote you what's been said in the video

@vincevvn

Жыл бұрын

@@plunntic no, a quantum computer makes complex calculations due to their ability to not just operate on a binary system but a system that can be any number between 1 and 0. This can absolutely not determine how space time and wormholes would behave in real life so this video is absolutely moronic

Not only they didn't created a wormhole, but they didn't pretend that they did.

@MrLethalShots

Жыл бұрын

*didn't pretend that they didn't?

@piwi2005

Жыл бұрын

@@MrLethalShots didn't pretend that they did. They simulated a wormhole with a quantum algorithm. You can simulate pac man, it doesn't make pac man real. Experiment didn't bring any news on quantum mechanics, nor on wormholes, nor on quantum computers.

@MrLethalShots

Жыл бұрын

@@piwi2005 I agree. What I am trying to say is that this hype is perpetuating because the original researchers allowed it to get this bad.

@piwi2005

Жыл бұрын

@@MrLethalShots ok, finally got it.

@b0ark1ng21

Жыл бұрын

They simulated it

Hello Dr. Miles! First off, thank you for this amazing video. Found it in my reccomended and I don't regret watching it! I only have one problem: can you put a link to the sources in the description? I would really like to read the papers myself. Best of luck, -A curious viewer.

@simo805

Жыл бұрын

it really wasnt wormhole, misleading info

@jl3268

11 ай бұрын

He reads each and every one. Write them down and look them up yourself.

Well explained! TY!

Most concise, complete, and clearest explanation I’ve seen or read. Thank you.

@Dawnarow

Жыл бұрын

And you don't wonder why that is? :/

@NoOne-qi4tb

Жыл бұрын

@@Dawnarow why is that

@jonathanbyrdmusic

Жыл бұрын

@@NoOne-qi4tb there's the negative energy we need for the experiment 🤣

When can I buy one?

in derek's @veritasium video representing poynting vector diagram ,do we still use ampere's hand rule to find magnetic fields using conventional current? (not electron movement ?)

People are sleeping on this channel, real high quality stuff here!

@Rajivrocks-Ltd.

Жыл бұрын

@@dogslol1928 Ghetto speak? Bruh...

amazing video, I'll do my Final Year Project in this topic

This I hear here first, and sorta meshes with my personal headcannon of what is what. Which is that matter is concentrated space. However there is time and causality. So so far my only idea is that concentrated space fluctuates between being concentrated and smoothen out states. The speed at which they do this is basically the speed of causality clocked at light speed. The motion that gravity creates comes off as the inetrtia that remains after each cycle because as each concentration enters its concentrated state, it pulls the entirety of this space towards itself as its contracts into its peak concentrated form governed by the level of energy exist in that spot. When we speak about energy cannot be destroyed is a fact in this theory that the concentration amount space does in each cycle will remain the same across every cycle. I also got some ideas to test this relieing on the idea that the inertia part relies on a transition phase, i don't think it could happen if its instantenous between fully concentrated and smoothen out space fluctuation and different concentration levels effects each other before a the cycle reach its peak amplitude.

This goes towards 'explaining' the Bell paradox. There can be no local variable theory of quantum mechanics because the variable involved in an entangled pair is not in this universe. It exists in the wormhole with essentially zero separation between the two. (At least initially)

@just-a-fnf-fan

Жыл бұрын

I am confusion

@ntp5358

Жыл бұрын

@@just-a-fnf-fan Me too

@vrfitnessandgaming3234

Жыл бұрын

@@just-a-fnf-fan nice to meet u confusions. I am lost

You mentioned some information gets transfered between quantum entangled particles, what information are you referring to? To my understanding, once particles are entangled the information has been shared at that point. Why does observation of those particles need to transfers information from one particle to the other?

@jedrek1521

Жыл бұрын

@@mr_clean575 change? The spin is the opposite and remains that way. What information needs to be transferred?

@jedrek1521

Жыл бұрын

@@mr_clean575 thanks for the info! The confusion came in around the wave function collapse. My understanding is that the collapse does not need to transfer info. If the first observed particle is spin up we know the other one is spin down but only way to know the other one is spin down is by collapsing it. So say 2 entangled particles are taken to each side of the visible universe, we collapse 1 and its spin down. We at one side of the universe know that but the other side does not know and won't know until they collapse their wave which we knownwill be spin down but they have no idea.

Thanks a lot for this video. Would you do one on what infinity actually is? I've never been able to get my head around how i! If you keep anding 1 to a finite number, how does that lead you to infinity?

What was the distance the ostensible wormhole spanned? Or was it a simulation experiment somehow conducted within the quantum computer?

Every single day new articles, videos, and news headlines come out highlighting some new discovery or experiment that's going to change the world.... but nothing ever happens.

@MonkeSle

Жыл бұрын

Cause application is different from discovery, and unfortunately we are all terrible at applying what we've learned

@heaz32

Жыл бұрын

@@MonkeSle that’s a weak response, imo. How many times do we have to hear about research in medicine, space exploration, climate change, etc that claim extravagant, life-altering discoveries of which after reading the headline disappears from our lives completely? Sure, there may be more articles and a few KZread videos made about it, but none of this stuff ever impacts our lives in a meaningful way. Here’s my example, some people will claim that my life is impacted by quantum computing every single day for the better, supposedly. But my life pre quantum computing is no different then than it is now. Now take this and apply it to some new cancer treatment, yet cancer rates and deaths only continue to rise each year. Apply it to anything supposedly happening in space.

@brianbarber5401

Жыл бұрын

This is a problem with the media, not science.

@MonkeSle

Жыл бұрын

@@heaz32 This is a weak argument in my opinion, because your argument is purely anecdotal in nature, and generally relies on "if I hear about this or that, why don't I see this affecting my life?" It's again because adoption is slower than research. You don't just discover something and immediately commercialize it, and even if it is able to be commercialized, politicians may get in the way, and funding is a whole separate issue. These are important discoveries, and things are happening, but to expect things to happen so fast is an impatient mindset that is reliant on everything just happening soon after a discovery, which only happens in a dream world.

@zs9652

Жыл бұрын

Bruh our world has been wildly changed by general relativity and other scientific advancements. Look at two hundred year increments and see how much the world has changed from breakthroughs. Things don't change much in your day to day life until you look back through the years.

This reminds me of Hegels theories, which overlap with both relativity and quantum mechanics. His last section I the phenomenogy is "absolute knowing," perhaps this can be combined with this theory that the universe is made of information?

What a great video!

I saw a video I thought that said that relativity doesn't work for universe level because of galaxy spiral outer edges not making sense? Am I way off? They mentioned something about a modified Newtonian dynamics?

Can this be used for FTL communications?

@KCM25NJL

Жыл бұрын

FTL communications break causality...... and you REALLY don't want that.

There's a universe where I'm fucking Batman

@TheOnlyHyland

Жыл бұрын

Means a few different things.... I would say there's a universe where your fucking batman and a universe where your fucking batman .... 🤔

@shawneil14

Жыл бұрын

@@TheOnlyHyland why not both

Thanks for helping contribute to undermining the legitimacy of actual science!

@vincevvn

Жыл бұрын

Exactly, people are really buying this shit

I guess the question is can multiple particles be in tangled to the same place in another part of t universe. Because we can’t do much with it if we can’t prove clusters of entangled particle groups.

Very exciting.

What does the elapsed time for information to get from one side to the other signify? Is it somehow correlated to the physical distance between the two ends of the worm-hole? Has it been observed to be super-luminal? One would think that information transfer being super-luminal would be the proof that a worm-hole has been successfully created. If the information transfer speed is sub-luminal there must be other indications as proof that are probably not very approachable by us layman.

@Eireternal

Жыл бұрын

They didn't say but there's no reason to believe the speed was super luminal. The wormhole would just connect the two very distant points but the traveling entity doesn't have to go fast through it.

@aliciafraser1835

Жыл бұрын

Don't think the point was that it took a certain amount of time to go through, but rather... The fact that they could reliable predict the time it would take. Though I'm no big brain so meh.

@any_one_else

Жыл бұрын

i think they cant confirm the speed unless they build a much bigger quantum computer i remember listening to the youngest of the their team saying their first calculation showed they needed a QC at least 10 times stronger than the existing one in google to collect all needed information this expirement is incomplete but it gave them the most important result that warmholes does exist

@nikidino8

Жыл бұрын

Even if the information transfer speed is sub-luminal it shows that we have a definitve tool to have lossless communication over distance when we always condsider the speed and distance between two sources.

How long did it take to travel through it?

if physics has a good ending, this sounds to be the start.

Does many more dimension be required to explain worm hole?

The 'De Sitter'/'Anti De Sitter' Holographic Space problem can be resolved if we assume cosmos is a black hole - with gravity emerging from its Event Horizon inwards, accelerating the expanding universe outwards (also the explanation for Dark Energy).

@SuperGamerDad30

Жыл бұрын

I think dark energy is the anti gravity/ massive energy pulse keeping this wormhole(our universe) open as matter passes through it , that’s what they looking for

This needs way more views.

@hans-joachimbierwirth4727

Жыл бұрын

That's what bullshit like this is intended for: more views for ad moneys.

Could they simulate this with one end directed into or around a black hole?

So quantum entaglement states that if you observe or interact with one particle, then its corresponding particle would change simultaneously no matter how far? if so, (I'm aware this is probably impossible) wouldn't it be cool if there was a way to manipulate these particles in a way that resembles the communication involved in a telegram? A "Quantogram" if you will. If this was feasible it could solve the issue of planet-to-planet communication that we would run into when colonizing other planets

@UltriLeginaXI

Жыл бұрын

@@leeroyjenkins0 darn, it makes a cool sci-if idea though right?

It's so strange because I know this idea wasn't new I was watching documentaries way back in 2008 or before. They spoke about wormholes and quantum entanglement when they were talking about TELEPORTATION. They were trying to talk about the many ways one can transfer data/people through space and the pros and cons. I don't think they ever said they were equal though. I always thought I could just open the wormhole, throw the entangled particles through and then we wouldn't have to worry about how long it stayed opened...because the particles are entangled already. However since it's duality I don't think that's going to be possible now.

@Ghryst

Жыл бұрын

you are a victim of clickbait and misleading info. no wormholes were created of any kind. the coin always did have one head and one tail.

@jasonrhodes9683

Жыл бұрын

This stuff makes me feel super stupid. If you teleported something through their wormhole, would the original be destroyed or would a perfect copy appear at the other end?

@RatusMax

Жыл бұрын

@@jasonrhodes9683 I wish I knew the name of that documentary it had all the answers to your questions. That was years ago so my memory may be off but I know they talked about both scenarios. The best I can tell you is to type into YT "teleportation documentary" You'll either find it or not. Just know the science isn't defined yet. THEY decide to destroy your body as protocol. They may say that "doing the measurement will destroy the original copy" however that may not be true. As I also thought, what if I take the original state and save it. Then send it to multiple entangled teleporters? Then we have cloning and not teleportation. This is why by protocol, they must destroy the original. To preserve originality. If this teleportation technology exists I ask a second question. Take the persons state, save it for 100,000 years and then recreate it. What happens? We just made time travel. it's a very muddy topic not even the smartest people have it down. So don't feel stupid.

@jasonrhodes9683

Жыл бұрын

@@RatusMax thank you

@businessmanager7670

Жыл бұрын

@@Ghryst false worhmholes have been created as i published on news already

Thank you for your content, it comes highly appreciated. We need more people like you, making science approachable for the average person

6:35 correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t there technically a force keeping the wormhole open considering it’s open in the first place? It clearly isn’t a lot of present considering it collapses under a person gravity, but if there is a force causing it to stay open, it wouldn’t be out of the realm of possibility to find one with a stronger force keeping it open

@ButNustin

Жыл бұрын

Again, correct me if I’m wrong pls. I’m high af rn 😂

@vincevvn

Жыл бұрын

That is a great question but since this video is full of shit they can’t answer that

@spuffles2104

Жыл бұрын

I'm not specialised in this field but logically speaking yes, the problem is that the deeper you look into how and why wormholes function the way they are, the less logic exists, and our "current" knowledge makes it difficult to give a proper reason for why do what they do. there's a ton of theory's that help alot but not complete. (hope it helped answer)

awesome video! its sad that some people just shrugged this saying its just a simulation, like I even saw some rando saying how this is different to Portal (the game)

@TheBiggreenpig

Жыл бұрын

It is the same. Both are simulations on a computer. Maybe Portal has better graphics.

@lindseylindsey9200

Жыл бұрын

@@TheBiggreenpig To my knowledge, a quantum computer isn’t really a computer, it’s a chamber devoid of air and extremely cold, which eliminates a lot of outside interference. So it seems they really did make a wormhole, but in a very specific environment. So it may be a while before this has any practical use, but it’s still pretty cool

@TheBiggreenpig

Жыл бұрын

@@lindseylindsey9200 jokes fly past you. But jokes aside, the quantum computer isn't just the qubits. That's like saying an ordinary computer is just its CPU, or even GPU.

Shoutouts to the algorithm and the aneurysm

I’m quite the nerd in terms of finding stuff like this super interesting, but a lot of this stuff goes straight over my head as I lack the scientific knowledge. I don’t even have an understanding of entanglement, superposition or quantum mechanics. But does this sort of thing mean that in theory we would at some point be able to have instantaneous global communication/internet connectivity etc. given that data would be transferred across thousands of miles in basically 0 seconds? Or am I being very dumb?

@stylusapteryx1490

Жыл бұрын

I think 10.37 to 11.00 answers your question a bit. The experiment was in a lab and used the maths for a different sort of universe than the one we've actually got (a universe where space itself is curved outwards instead of "flat" like ours is). We probably don't know yet whether it is possible to translate the results into a flatspace universe like the one we live in. Sorting the theory in ADS space is only a first step. But a cool one.

Well, if someone was going to open up a portal into Hell, of course google would be involved.

The fact that it has to be done through quantum computers makes it a bit silly, since transferring the state change would require transferring data from one end to the other through normal space, but it's good to see action on developing useful manifolds. If gross field topology manipulation ever becomes a thing then these kinds of experiments could give a jump start on useful applications.

6:25 what about a secondary gravitational force from inside the wormhole. like a stint in a vein?

@jjwhittle8873

Жыл бұрын

Gravity pulls. They need negative gravity. Thats why this only works in anti-de sitter space.

10:16 - So, that's interesting. The logical conclusions one might draw... So, if this matter level of the universe is resultant from information or patterns in constituent lower dimensions... This particular existence should be very stable, if not inevitable. What a heavenly idea.

So if worm hole connects space-'time' right. So , can it do time travel also?

@ChilledBacon

Жыл бұрын

Space time is the time to get from point a to point b through space. (I think) so it’s not time travel, more like relative instant transportation

Does it help "push" the cubit or it helps it fall through?

The "Orbs" in the Airliner video seem entangle and also seem to collapse in on each other.... creating a wormhole?

Basically, I see this as most helpful as to bring alive the concept of sub space communication in Star Trek that is essentially instantaneous comms across light years

@tonymc9102

Жыл бұрын

Subspace communications has limited range at a great enough distance it takes time for the message to get through if you actually saw star trek.

@daveythehand4964

Жыл бұрын

@@tonymc9102 i have. Many episodes lol. The point being, it’s much faster than regular travel, my God. And it’s obviously quantum in nature. Just try to enjoy life a lil damn, ha

@wastelesslearning1245

Жыл бұрын

I wonder if it could be wireless. This wormhole effect seems to only take place in one machine from one point to another point within. It seems to me like this more useful to transport physical cargo at speeds of electricity (or the electro magnetic field needed to stabilize the wormhole through the journey). I don’t think this team found out your to make two openings to the worm hole and separate and stabilize them wirelessly. So I think this could turn out more like a wormhole version of those pneumatic mail delivery tubes and land lines. Ie requiring infrastructure between the two destinations like a wire or physical tunnel.

@none-ro9dz

Жыл бұрын

@@wastelesslearning1245 you're correct. qubits require a superconducting media to travel through or they collapse, you can't just send the m through space.

@wastelesslearning1245

Жыл бұрын

@@none-ro9dz still potentially awesome technology especially if you can leverage this precision to fabricate or medically operate. Hope the quantum relationship wave information are never deconstructed/disconnected even if De-corporealized during the relay process to keep up with speed. If so this could be just as good as portals “teleportation”; avoiding the kill and clone paradox.

that is not a wormhole..its called entanglement

Time is an illusion, space also is, thinking is real. Within not so much time we will include consciousness as part of the quantum mechanics and so physics. Thanks for the very good speach.

Given time to develop, this will mean that we can have a near instant communication system form anywhere (earth, moon, mars, space vehicles) to anywhere. Away with the clutter of satellites, 'radio'-waves and cables.

@sketchnoyes7090

Жыл бұрын

This is already achievable with entanglement 😊

@khatharrmalkavian3306

Жыл бұрын

@SketchNoyes - No it's not.

@francobuttarelli760

Жыл бұрын

@@sketchnoyes7090 I think it isn’t

@sketchnoyes7090

Жыл бұрын

@@khatharrmalkavian3306 okay well it is, entanglement you could use it for basic communication. Like a Morris code, but ya you can’t transmit large bits of data, but hypothetically you could communicate with entanglement 😏🤓🧐

@thesenamesaretaken

Жыл бұрын

@@sketchnoyes7090 no

How does one find the entangled particles? How to you take a particle and search for the other linked counterpart?

@jjwhittle8873

Жыл бұрын

They're created. Entanglement in this sense is a deliberate process.

Schwartzschild is pronounced like Shvurtz Shield (no child there). My 2 cents I guess. Other than that, no particular need to point out how good the video is, it's obvious.

Looks like they could make a portal in real life now.

very intesting topic

What if particles are actually black holes under quantum physics and at certain scale they start playing by different rules (turn to black holes) And particle radioactive decay (half life etc) is same as black hole radiation (on different scale)

Perhaps my time machine isn't a pipe dream after all.

So basically we can communicate random bits instantly to people on mars lol

@septopus3516

Жыл бұрын

No we can't

@Halum11

Жыл бұрын

No we can’t, that would require a space time wormhole, not a simulated one.

OK, Here's an idea for a practical device using this principle that could potentially give us faster-than light communications without violating the principles of Special Relativity. As follows:- First you have to setup the comms channel. This sadly involves a sub-light transfer (to some destination) of a primed comms device consisting of one-half of this same apparatus with an already-established quantum tunnel between the two halves. The other half remains on Earth of course. (Don't ask me how - that's just technical stuff for the engineers to solve) In order to use the device, the transmitting end can now send a message to the receiver by inserting data into the wormhole and selectively collapsing the section of wormhole that contains the message, squeezing it out at the other end effectively instantly. Messages can be returned the same way. Note that the wormhole gets used up by the transmissions and eventually there is no more entanglement left to be collapsed. So in order to keep a channel open you would need to continue transmitting 'empty' entanglement through normal space (at sublight) and you'd have to use the channel sparingly so that your average data stream over time didn't exceed the lightspeed limit. Otherwise, you'd simply empty the storage and messaging would have to stop. This is just a though and I haven't really considered the implications for causality associated with this schema. So feel free to critique. 🤣🤣

@erbenton07

Жыл бұрын

Our top physicists are calling they want to get more information on your idea because they never thought of it.

@cameronphares2482

Жыл бұрын

If I understand your idea correctly, I think the issue with that idea is that the collapsing of the worm hole would'nt mean pushing whatever was in it out to the other side, faster than light. if I understand how they function, they are still sub lightspeed travel time relative to actual inputs and not wave functions collapsing. so the law of information is being conserved. hypothetically your message would collapse into a spread out mess across space at the same distance it would have been had you sent it normally, maybe even some time after you collapsed the worm hole (relative to you) as to conserve the law of information, which is just wierd to think about.

@qwadratix

Жыл бұрын

@@cameronphares2482 It's not 'an idea' it's an explanation of why this is an important demonstration. But never mind.

@cameronphares2482

Жыл бұрын

@@qwadratix my friend, you yourself said it was an idea. and correct me if im wrong, but this has not been done, far from that it is something you thought up. making it an idea. which is fine.

@johnatchason6506

Жыл бұрын

I think a true wormhole does not create a temporal paradox because you're still not travelling faster than light... it's just that there is a lot LESS space-time to travel through if you take the wormhole. Why go all the way around the lake when you can take the Einstein-Rosen bridge?

This would be a god-send to some space agency like NASA because it would allow them to transfer information to their drones near-instantly. Alternatively, if we could get it to work with more mass, we could just TP supplies or weapons or something wherever we want.

Watching this i came up with a theory: Knowing that alternative universes are theoretically possible and black holes are matter squezzed into a singular point inside, what if the black hole is some sort of 'portal' to this other universe or to our universe itself? I can't wrap my mind around the idea that gravitational forces pull matter so hard in one point (or deep, accordingly to the fabric experiment) that creates a connection to other entangled particle. If matter is so compressed from every side, how could it go anywhere? My theory is, when you enter a worm/black hole, it sends you to other point in universe it contains -- alternative or this -- in the direction you are looking at without being able to go back (what would explains that nothing can scape from it), spaghettification would just be a 'visual effect' Imagine a water sphere shell with a small ball floating in the center, the shell would be the gravitational lensing effect and the ball the singularity, when you finger tough the shell, it is attracted by the gravity towards the ball touching it and going to the point you 'touched' or to an alternative but extremely similar universe contained inside the singularity. Other ideas that may be part of this: Black holes are matter 'compressed' by gravity right? therefore, what stops this matter of turning into anything else, like exploding (big bang) and creating new galaxies and planets inside?

Whenever "quantum" is attached to something, I take it to mean "not really". Quantum teleportation? Not really teleportation. Quantum wormhole? Not going to the Gamma Quadrant.

10:08, please tell me I'm not the only one to spot a cartoon baby in the bottom there XD

At this point 0:40 I thought: what's the difference between stretching a plank length square to become an entry/exit point of the universe and quantum tunneling/entanglement/wormholes?

What happens if you divide a zero in a quantom computer?

Congrats to u too... Regards Mad Man'S Parade

Magnetic wormhole are cool too

And the dude that did the quantum programming was a young dude…this was a good feat I’ve been looking at too

Many localities make for a great design, fascinating how information flows through the universe

i myself have teleported, otis t. carr also made them. you have to know about gravitational physics. this is whats used in the secret space program. i have videos of the craft in space doing there thing. yes, teleportation through gravity waves.

Does it go to the past present or future

11:26 - So... How do scientists classify that kind of mirrored symmetry? Can something shift between the two, creating a directional force / motion equivalent?

@minarishell

Жыл бұрын

As far as we know, applying force to anything in superposition inherently induces waveform collapse, but the reality is we just don't know enough yet

@10-AMPM-01

Жыл бұрын

@@minarishell I see. When bro says de sitter space... That sounds... Incomplete. Perhaps I've never seen the locations of actual stellar objects on one of those graphs with the 45 degree line marking light speed and possible influence from ahead masses. Technically our universe should have a stretch to it. Our universe is a matter of where our cognitive experience begins. No matter where intelligent life proliferates, they will consider us (even if they think we'd be little green men without external genitals). Perhaps, if any system of interactions can reproduce consciousness.... It will have thought of us in some far flung way. But, we are taking about how we can't reach them. We can't steer our solar system. We need more energy than our solar system has, to really explore the galaxy. But, how many of us need to go? What is humanity without a home planet? Thus, the urgency of wormholes. Figuratively thinking outside of the box. Wormholes might lead to perfect clones of human minds, not just DNA.

I love how it happened on my birthday lol

Einstain looks very happy

For the first time I understand the rubber band between two entangled particles. Thanks for this great lecture.

title graphic is clickbait-y and literally the exact type of headline sabine hossenfelder would tell someone to ignore.

could entanglement be a quantum level of a relativistic wormhole? What if this entanglement already existed among objects? Could manipulating one of the entangled objects affect the other in a similar way? If that is so, maybe we could theoretically manipulate atoms that are near us, and through entanglement manipulate atoms elsewhere in the universe? If we could, we could create sensors that could detect things in another part of the universe, and allow us to observe other regions of the universe and explore it? If this can be done on a macro-level, we could create an entangled android that could allow us first contact or human-machine-interface enabled exploration of other distant worlds without having to travel through a wormhole or launch generation ships, thus allowing in ways exploration of other parts of the universe without having to leave our back yard? If this is possible, could entangled nanobots manipulate other atoms that are entangled, and create in ways sensors that go across the entire universe, measuring things like its expansion rate, and allowing us to maintain connections to distant galaxies that we otherwise would not be able to observe due to the accelerating expansion of the universe, and thus begin to manipulate the universe at a macro-cosmic level, building structures that can affect the universe or fight against heat death in the far future?

and what are the "sides" they sent "from" to "to"?

A 2001 issue of popular mechanics had a article explaining a labe shot a Lazer through cesium gas chamber and the laser reached the other end before entering chamber.

The importance of this experiment, assuming it's repeatable, is unfathomable. This will truly change everything in physics, technology, chemistry, basically everything will be directly impacted. But ONLY if this experiment is proven repeatable and I truly hope it does as this is the most exciting potential discovery in physics ever (in my humble, and less than educated opinion).

@holism

Жыл бұрын

What do you think it would change exactly?

@malkuth999

Жыл бұрын

actually it's just entanglement at a distance..it has nothing todooth wormholes in 3 dimensionalspace

@oldblinddarby2498

Жыл бұрын

In terms of change it would allow us much more detailed manipulation of entanglement as it deepens or understanding of the fundamental forces at play. Forces which are influencing the rest of physics. In a nut shell, it is a step closer, possibly a large step, towards a truly unified field theory. In terms of application, I can't say. Kinda like the early days in the discovery of radiation, or electricity. Being able to accurately and predictably manipulate and force/phenomena has always eventually led to unpredictable innovation and further discovery, starting with the use of the first tool (likely a stick or rock) and leading to today's tech. Any discovery or experiment has this same potential, some much more than others. We are still very early in the application of entanglement, but as with all technologies, the growth is likely to be exponential. Hopefully this will be a significant step towards more widespread adoption and innovation because for quantum computing to reach even a portion of its potential, we need as much use in as many different settings as possible. All that said, I am a biologist, not a physicist, and this experiment could prove to be complete b.s. and I'm getting excited because of hype not actual results. I hope this isn't the case.

Didn't they do this already? Maybe 10 years ago, didn't they teleported a proton/photon to outer space?

physicist: I've created a worm hole! worm: big deal, I do it every day.

Wasn’t this always thought to be the case since white holes were thought of. As that’s a 1 way worm hole.

Is space and time reality complete in itself?

I feel like the the next 50 years is gonna be the pilot episode for Stat trek

@devilsoffspring5519

11 ай бұрын

More like the next 50 million years, or 500 million... but yeah. The one thing that makes it mostly hogwash is that they claim it's gonna be like that in the 24th century. Still cool that people enjoy the show, but a few hundred years probably ain't gonna cut it. As technology becomes indescribably advanced and far beyond anything that's recognizable today, which it will, the biggest hurdle to overcome won't be newer and better technology. It will be preventing our species from using that technology to annihilate itself all in the name of power and politics. Even with older technology, humanity has come very close to eradicating itself from the known universe on a few occasions. That technology is nuclear weaponry. Think of what kind of threat there will be to the world when technology is so advanced that the most powerful nuclear weapons are a total joke.

I'm amazed how big the contribution of my countrymen has been. in this short video already 2 dutch names I didn't know about and I know that there's many other famous Dutch physicists and astronomers. Willem de Sitter and Gerard 't Hooft

What are other properties of worm hole?

Haha. From strings to muscle movement from chemically stored energy. They were right, and so was I.

For a dissenting view, see Peter Woit’s coverage of this on his blog, _Not Even Wrong._

Guys if you see titles like these but nothing in the news talking about it Select from button menu 'do not recommend channel'

How was this experiment different from just demonstrating entanglement???

@septopus3516

Жыл бұрын

It isn't. Around new fiscal year, Fermi labs always has a half-assed experiment to show new engineering because they have yet to show new physics or new science...but their budget never shrinks...and the scientists get fatter exponentially...🤪

@brandonbutler334

Жыл бұрын

Because they allowed a particle--separate from the group of entangled particles creating the wormhole--to **pass through** the worm hole and come out on the other side. Simply demonstrating entanglement would be to change the spin of the particle and observe that its entangled partner also changed to remain opposite.

edward teller was one man who did these as well in the mid 1980s.

Ah I want my without papers drive (Warp) now!

Is it virtual ? Or physical

This channel is becoming my favourite channel among fermilab and pbs spacetime.

Einstein’s look at the end..!

I’ve seen teleporters and teleporting from the left side to the right side in Megaman fan games.