“The British wanted to keep good relations with Buenos Aires” Interesting sentence

@MaxwellTornado

Ай бұрын

The whole Falkland conflict is a post-WW2 thing. For most of its history, Britain was Argentina's main trading partner.

@matid9687

Ай бұрын

Argentina had lots of trade with the UK back then

@freddekl1102

Ай бұрын

Your point being? It was the Argentinians who invaded Falklands

@Drunkieman

Ай бұрын

It seems almost comical that a century later someone had to stop the British PM from levelling Buenos Aires with a nuke.

@JLAvey

Ай бұрын

Just recognize it as a joke and move on.

James Bizonette, etc etc Kelly Moneymaker, obviously

@adambashaxd420

Ай бұрын

FRFR

@jamesbissonette

Ай бұрын

You know it

@justt1984

Ай бұрын

Facts

@enterchannelname3213

Ай бұрын

James Bizonette funded expeditions to the Amazon.

@highlyeducatedtrucker

Ай бұрын

How soon we forget Spinning Three Plates.

It's like Brazil kept winning all its dice checks

@MCsCreations

Ай бұрын

You don't want to question it. You want to go home and rethink your life. ~waves the hand~

@christopherk6923

Ай бұрын

only when it has to deal with other countries, not when it has to deal with internal issues

@FodaseNaoLigo

Ай бұрын

​@@christopherk6923every country in existance

@jokhard8137

Ай бұрын

Bruh, is this a Disco Elysium reference?

@dantefiore8442

Ай бұрын

@@jokhard8137its any rpg game with a dice system reference

Some correction: the last significant border change in Brazil was not in 1895, Acre belonged to Bolivia despite several disputes until 1903 when a treaty was signed and it was sold to Brazil

@Thiago.Acquati

Ай бұрын

O acre é tão esquecido que até o James Bizzonete cagou pra existência dele kkkkk Coitado dos acrianos

@ladymorwendaebrethil-feani4031

Ай бұрын

But the Acre doesnt exist.

@mrlolmaster1019

Ай бұрын

Correction: Acre does not exist, it is a fairytale in a book called The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe

@the0ne809

Ай бұрын

yes... Acre which is a state that does not exist.

@choppacast

Ай бұрын

Let me add that AFAIK there are areas in Southern Brazil that were also incorporated after 1895, during the "Questão Palmas"

If anyone is wondering why Portugal agreed to that tiny land given by the pope, Portugal invested a lot into the African, Arabian and Indies (actual India) trade and colonization, so this treaty guaranteed Portuguese monopoly. Nobody at the time knew how big and profitable Americas would be at the time so Spain made a gamble when making the treaty.

@lonecom685

Ай бұрын

Portugal got the best of both worlds in the end

@proof4469

Ай бұрын

@@lonecom685well Portugal had it good until the British and Dutch basically kicked Portugal out of the Indian and Pacific ocean

@RafitoOoO

Ай бұрын

They also didn't know how big the American continent was, so for all they know they could've gotten most of the land anyway.

@GBOAC

Ай бұрын

There was no tiny land to be agreeable with, Brazil wasn't discovered until 1500.

@EEEEEEEE

Ай бұрын

E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

“Why was the Paraguayan war so bloody” could be a great vid tbh

@joshuacampbell1625

Ай бұрын

Modern warfare with medieval tactics. And while the war was incredibly bloody, more recent studies suggest that it wasn't AS bloody as is often portrayed.

@mi-lo4ec

Ай бұрын

@@joshuacampbell1625IDK the fact that Paraguay lost 70% of their male population compared to Germany in ww2 who lost only 46% of their male population, seems to be a very bloody war

@muhammedjaseemshajeef6781

Ай бұрын

Yep

@joshuacampbell1625

Ай бұрын

@mi-lo4ec that's what I mean, though. It probably wasn't as high as 70%. The only source for that statistic is the census taken sometime after the war, which seems to have been incomplete due in no small part the destruction caused by the war in the first place. I've seen 30% to 50% suggested as more realistic figures. Don't get me wrong, that's still insanely high, but its possible to recover demographically from that. Once you're hitting 70%, that's neatly impossible.

@angelzavala2254

Ай бұрын

It's because Paraguay attacked neighbors that were way more powerful than itself, and that Brazil kept fighting Paraguay after Aregntina and Uruguay call for peace, as a sign of revenge.

I have an economy midterm tomorrow and I'm sitting here, gladly watching the territorial evolution of Brazil from an amazing history channel. Totally worth it.

@EEEEEEEE

Ай бұрын

E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

@JohnnyDoh

Ай бұрын

Time to lock in

@DirkusTurkess

Ай бұрын

Damn, you can't even rely on working at McDonalds in your future, so maybe focus up on school.

@amirpourghoureiyan1637

Ай бұрын

best of luck

@jwal2

Ай бұрын

How did it go?

“The British wanted to promote good relations with Buenos Aires.” How times change. 😂

@muhammedjaseemshajeef6781

Ай бұрын

Most of the time

@DaveSCameron

Ай бұрын

The same way we smh and laugh at the arcane stupidity of this situation our descendants will scratch their heads at our behaviour regarding the “Drug War” racket….🥳

@georgebailey8179

Ай бұрын

I don't think that has ever changed. If Argentina would only respect the wishes of the inhabitants to remain British, the UK would happily have great relations with Argentina. But Argentina won't give up its colonial dreams.

@guadalupe8589

Ай бұрын

​@@DaveSCameronno they won't, they'll be too high to understand what's going on...

@guadalupe8589

Ай бұрын

​@@georgebailey8179But, the Falklands was originally colonized. Not like the British are the original inhabitants

I LOVE BRAZIL!!! love from Trinidad and Tobago 🇧🇷❤‍🔥🇹🇹

@forever-wn8bu

Ай бұрын

love you too back bro

@LatinW321

Ай бұрын

Am both Trini and Brazilian 😂

I guess the real question is why Portugal's South American territory all stayed in one piece after gaining independence, while Spain's colonies became a bunch of independent countries.

@krasnamerah1926

Ай бұрын

Portugal saw them as chains of colonies that needs to interact with each other to foster kindship and lessen the burden from Europe. Spain wanted their colonies to serve Spain first and even making some sort of rivalry between the colonies. Oh, also the rugged terrain impeded communications too and making the regional elites stronger.

@oole0111

Ай бұрын

Because of the royal court settling in Rio, and the fact that Portugal's prince declared the independence of Brazil, he reigned for a decade or so.

Ай бұрын

In reality, it is for three reasons: first it is because the Portuguese are allies of the United Kingdom (which is why they never conspired against it as happened with Hispanic America); The second is because unlike the Spanish Viceroyalties, which had their own universities and therefore their own nationalist feelings apart from being Spanish, in Brazil the majority went to study in Portugal, to maintain that sense of Portuguese belonging; The third is that they had someone from the royal house who took the reins of Brazil, an idea that the Spanish could not do due to the capture of the king and his son by the French (although in reality it was Charles III of Spain , who several decades ago after the independence of the United States, did not want to carry out the reform that Aranda recommended to him to create three kingdoms in America, governed by his sons and to alleviate future attempts at independence).

@leonardorivelorivelo9253

Ай бұрын

Its because of the monarchy Brazil's independence was a son doing a coup on his own father per his own orders in a roundabout way to guarantee that they keep their rule over both places without a civil war

@elyisusking3603

Ай бұрын

Portugal never divided Brazil into Viceroyalties like Spain did (well they did for a short period of time just for later to be reincoporated into one colonial rule Brazil didn't suffered from a independence revolution tho, it was fairly peaceful and with little resistance from the Portuguese monarchy, althoughh Brazil was near the point of collapse after Pedro I abdicated but miraculously survived

“How did Brazil get so big?” Brazil: A lot of eating and exercise. I’ve been trying hard to bulk up. I like to think that it’s a good look.

@benoithudson7235

Ай бұрын

“Beef. Lots and lots of beef.”

@muhammedjaseemshajeef6781

Ай бұрын

Defeating all of their neighbours 🗿

@rayelgatubelo

Ай бұрын

@@benoithudson7235 Argentina: MY BEEF IS BETTER THOUGH

@johnmitchell4124

Ай бұрын

Plus Mexican supplements 😉

@EEEEEEEE

Ай бұрын

E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

"How did Brazil get so big?" Brazil: sit ups, push ups and plenty of juice

@robertmiller7921

Ай бұрын

"I WANT IT, I WANT IT, I WANNA BE A BIGGER COUNTRY!"

another thing worth mentioning was that it was very important that the king of portugal decided to move to Brazil, which was a very unique move on his part to say the least, if he hadn't done that then Brazil would have probably break apart into many smaller potuguese speaking countries just like it happened with the spanish territories in the americas were basically every atempt at unification failed, the first mexican empire and republic of central america, Gran Colombia, Peru-Bolivia confederation and Argentina trying to annex Uruguay and Paraguay

@Vishnujanadasa108

Ай бұрын

The Portuguese used guns and disease against aboriginals with spears. They didn’t win their empires fighting hand-to-hand against the greatest empires of their day like Greeks and Romans did.

@pliniojr95

Ай бұрын

Yes, that's true. Before the king moved to Brazil, each region identified more with itself than with Brazil as a whole. The centralization brought by Dom João VI and a somewhat pacific independence afterwards secured brazil's territorial union.

@FallenLight0

Ай бұрын

@@Vishnujanadasa108 neither Spain, and look how the Spanish empire is now

@morrismonet3554

Ай бұрын

@@Vishnujanadasa108 Why didn't the aboriginals invent guns themselves. They didn't even have the wheel. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@comradeofthebalance3147

Ай бұрын

@@morrismonet3554 I will bite. That is because gunpowder technology was something requiring the necessary resources and time to research it which the Tang-Song did, then Turks then the other Europeans. The natives had no real means for it. The wheel is something one would require if there are no other viable alternatives or that it was necessary. South America was densely packed with forests and was very mountainous in some at the same time. It did not have great plains like the Eurasian continent. There are reasons for these and not that they are what you comment implicitly implies.

I have genuinely wondered about this ever since I learned about the boundaries in the Treaty of Tordesillas, so thank you for explaining it!

@Thiago.Acquati

Ай бұрын

Yeah the simple explanation lies in two major facts 1st the Iberian union 2nd the decline of Spain

@EEEEEEEE

Ай бұрын

‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

@franbalcal

Ай бұрын

i would have added how Portugal was ok with the treaty where they seemingly hot much less, because at the time they didnt know how big the America's were and how Portugal already had a very profitable trade network in Africa and Asia that they much rather the Spanish dont start competing with.

@Omouja

Ай бұрын

Yeah, this video is very short actually, Brazil expansion was way more than that, like the Acre conflict, Paraguayan war, and many more lands that we "win" by diplomacy.

This video also secondarily helps explain why Uruguay is a thing, awesome. Keep up the great work History Matters.

It's really interesting how Brazil managed to gain a large amount of territory by just diplomatic power. And it's currently at it's biggest extent ever.

@jordanandrew2786

Ай бұрын

If only modern Brazilian leaders were half as competent as their predecessors.

@caiop.4972

Ай бұрын

Not exactly true, as Brazil gained some land as a result of the Triple Alliance War, but other than that it was using only diplomacy.

@godogs89

Ай бұрын

They left out the bit where Brazil invaded and illegally stole land from the indigenous Bolivians.

@duskpede5146

Ай бұрын

smh brazil hugboxing and getting all their land from transfer wars

@steroidbaggins2936

Ай бұрын

@@godogs89lol sucks to be Bolivian meu amigo sem costa.

I always wondered why the border established by the treaty of tordesillas was overridden and Brazil ended up being bigger than was supposed to be.

@benoithudson7235

Ай бұрын

I thought it would be “well the treaty said I can claim the entire drainage basin” but I guess not.

@MBHM001

Ай бұрын

Uti Possidetis

@Ecclesia_

Ай бұрын

Obviously Portugal thought 'what the fuck?' after most of America was discovered :')

@RafitoOoO

Ай бұрын

​@@Ecclesia_while, yes, they also made a lot of effort in India.

@EEEEEEEE

Ай бұрын

‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎E

I wish the video touched upon how Brazil managed to stay united whereas the other Spanish colonies broke apart into smaller countries.

@FULANODETAL

Ай бұрын

b being an EMPIRE

@marcus3445

Ай бұрын

Because of a centralized government and ruler. Trying to leave was suicidal, and after a while, the states and territories give up trying. The only territory that was successful was Cisplatina, a.k.a Uruguay, but that was because Brazil kinda wanted them to be a buffer state between them and Argentina and because Uruguay speak spanish.

@braziliantsar

Ай бұрын

By having a colonial model that helped centralization, mostly. I'm pretty sure that not speaking spanish also helped with some nationalist ideas of keeping the country united to not fall under our neighbors or become divided like them.

@proof4469

Ай бұрын

Empire

@FULANODETAL

Ай бұрын

@@braziliantsar well its hard to send reinfoments when napoleon murder 1 millon spanish people

Brazil got so big because James Bisonette got the pope to give Brazil god's blessing.

@concept5631

Ай бұрын

The Pope was given permission by James Bisonette to give Brazil God's blessing.

@limeboiler5471

Ай бұрын

@@concept5631 God was given permission by James Bisonette to give Brazil his blessing.

@slyasleep

Ай бұрын

He got a Brazilian.

@Average_Bob_Semple

Ай бұрын

@@concept5631 Hell Yeah

@georgebailey8179

Ай бұрын

Kelly Moneymaker bankrolled it too.

Actually the last border change happened in the now state of Acre, the westernest state of the country. It was part of Bolivia until 1899, when it declared it's independence, and after that was occupied by brazilian troops. Both countries came to an agreement called the Treaty of Petropolis in 1903 and Acre became a part of Brazil.

@islanoliveira

Ай бұрын

Acre's the brazilian Texas.

@Trixzinho

Ай бұрын

​​@@islanoliveira I would say that Acre is more like Ohio, at least in meme culture (don't exist, crazy shit happen there, magical lands, etc)

@islanoliveira

Ай бұрын

@@Trixzinho Both Acre and Texas were part of other countries, became independent and then were absorbed by the countries of the people that turned them independent.

@Trixzinho

Ай бұрын

@@islanoliveira Oh yeah, that's true my bad, I forgot about this fact (mainly because I didn't pay attention to your comment), anyway, I'm not a specialist on american history, but in Texas case it wasn't someting more "war-y"? Acre (or Brazil for that matter) sure had it's conflicts with Bolívia and and even Peru, but It wasn't so tense like Texas and México, you know?

@islanoliveira

Ай бұрын

@@Trixzinho Yes, Acre's case was calmer.

From Brazil, love this channel! Please make a vídeo about : “Why Brazil is no longer a Monarchy”!

@samsmith2635

Ай бұрын

Corruption, betrayal, ingratitude and sadness

@dw4201

Ай бұрын

Because the only real power keeping the emperor on the throne in the latter years of the monarchy was the support of the big landowners (all pro-slavery), and the abolishment of the slavery colapsed this support for the monarchy, most of the people were sympathetic to the emperor but didnt care enough about the monarchy itself to defend it when the coup came.

@NoxideXR

Ай бұрын

cause James Bisonette didnt like the monarchy

@vitorpereira9515

Ай бұрын

​@@samsmith2635 And we pay for that betrayal everyday. I want the monarchy back!

@nameunknown6453

Ай бұрын

3 reasons: 1- Positivismo 2- some in the military insatisfield with their condition under the regime 3- Old love rivarly

Fun fact: Until 1889 Brazil was an empire. First ruled by emperor Pedro I and then by his son, Pedro II respectively. Both of them were immensly popular, so the logical step was to stage a coup and abolish the monarchy, which happened in 1889.

@braziliantsar

Ай бұрын

What really happened was that Dom Pedro was really unpopular amongst the liberal politicians who were against slavery and pro industrialization. The coup took place because abolishing slavery was the last straw to the farmer oligarchy, who had the strongest lobby in the country. With that, they had no reason the keep the monarchy alive, so with the recent stronger army that was much more centralized after the Triple Alliance war, they did the pressure to depose him and his family.

@nameunknown6453

Ай бұрын

​@@braziliantsar You got it wrong mate. The *liberals* tended to be more averse to the idea of abolition than the conservatives since the liberals were more linked to the rural elites - so much so that all the abolitionist laws (Lei Eusébio de Queirós, Lei do Ventre Livre, Lei dos Sexagenários and Lei Áurea) were approved in moments in which the *conservative party* controlled parliament and the ministry. The liberals were, at the very least, in favor of a slower abolition process, giving time for the economy of their regions to readapt to the new reality. And the Emperor wasn't unpopuler amongst them, they just wanted the moderating power to be more limited and that the Brazilian government system should be more similar to the Westminster system (British parliamentarism) - Brazilian parliamentarism (or the reverse) was more like semi-presidentialism than parliamentarism.

"Until the Dutch showed up" feels like a theme. I am Dutch and it absolutely feels like a theme.

@warpdarkmatter

Ай бұрын

VAN DER LINDE???

@mrnobody8316

29 күн бұрын

@@warpdarkmatterHave some god damm faith

2:39 most of this disputes were settled by a Brazilian diplomat called barão do Rio Branco, he was so based that even after the monarchy fell and the republic was proclaimed they continued calling him by his title, baron (barão).

Brazil is crazy wild I need to get there someday

@radidov5333

Ай бұрын

is mental, I went there a couple of times.

@Dabeyoun

Ай бұрын

"You're going to Brazil!" Jokes aside, avoid Rio de Janeiro.

@paulofrota3958

Ай бұрын

pls don't...

@FIREBRAND38

Ай бұрын

@FeudalRoach Only if you want to get killed.

@matmcd

Ай бұрын

It's awesome here, but take care

Fun fact I: as "compensation" for taking so much land off the Tordesillas Treaty, Portugal gave Spain what is now Equatorial Guinea, in Africa. But they were so petty that from the 4 islands of its shore, Portugal gave only the southernmost and the northernmost, and the two remaining formed what is now the country of São Tomé and Príncipe.

As a Big Boy myself, Brazil's story really speaks to me

Brasileiros de todas as partes do mundo, chegou a hora de comentar no vídeo do History Matters!!!

@flawyerlawyertv7454

Ай бұрын

😅

@memofromessex

Ай бұрын

Que?

@braziliantsar

Ай бұрын

Ah tá, como se ele já não tivesse feito vídeos sobre o BR antes

@lonecom685

Ай бұрын

O último foi lá em 2021 kkkk Fazia tempo que não éramos o tópico da vez

@trolololololll

Ай бұрын

Evitar a fadiga

Brazilian history is so fascinating and awesome. Much love from America guys! (🇲🇰/🇺🇲❤️🇧🇷)

@paratrooper02

Ай бұрын

Yeah much love to America from Brazil too 🇧🇷🤝🇺🇲

0:40 - Brazil was only discovered in 1500, so it's not actually known why Portugal pushed the line west. It may have been only to protect sea lanes, but it always led to speculation Portugal might have known something.

@edmerc92

Ай бұрын

The Portuguese had already rounded the Cape of Good Hope in 1487 and knew that the best way to go around Africa was to make a wide sweep to the west to avoid the dangerous ocean currents. It’s very plausible that they ran into South America at some point, but they had no incentive to share this finding with the rest of Europe.

@danielguerrero894

4 күн бұрын

@@edmerc92 Anyways the notice that Colombus had arrived in West Indies wasn´t listened in Europa,only when Vespucci and portuguese explorers explored the coasts of South America until the River Plate Europe beginning to understand everything.

John Bisonnette's ambitions are big.

@inaworldfulloftrashbagsbet2023

Ай бұрын

Big ambitions mean nothing without funding from Kelly Moneymaker

@Bladekill1299

Ай бұрын

James*

@ibtaba

Ай бұрын

As big as Brazil?

@D.S.handle

Ай бұрын

He’s the patron saint of history.

@MrBattlecharge

Ай бұрын

Who?

Fun fact II. When negotiating the Tordesillas Treaty, both parts agreed to use Cape Verde as a reference. (The line would be drawn 360 leagues west of it). But after they signed, Portugal claimed that this was not the Cape Verde in Senegal as Spain assumed, bur rather the archipelago of Cape Verde (named after the place in Senegal), much further west, thus giving Portugal a much wider slab of the Brazilian coast.

@pliniojr95

Ай бұрын

Good point, especially for those who didn't understand why Portugal got a bigger chuck of land, as shown in 00:40-00:45.

Hey man, just wanted to say I’ve been watching you for years and it makes my day when you upload. Thank you for being so consistent! Keep it up man!

One small correction, there was actually a war between the United Provinces and the Empire of Brazil that lasted 3 years and thus the treat of 1828 come into effect, the war was inconclusive so nobody really won except Uruguay. Therefore we can say that both United Provinces and Brazil lost

@ezefinkielman4672

7 күн бұрын

Except Uruguay didn’t want independence from the United Provinces.

The real strength of your videos is that they answer questions I had not even thought to ask, but am happy to be informed about. Thank you.

1:42 I had to rewind several times to figure out what land Portugal gave to Spain.

@Spino2722

Ай бұрын

What did they get?

@micahbush5397

Ай бұрын

@@Spino2722 A tiny bit of land at the southern tip.

@Spino2722

Ай бұрын

@@micahbush5397 oh ok I see now

The fact that we get free videos from History Matters on KZread is priceless., keeping the education and knowledge alive. 👍

I love how you seamlessly (and accurately) update the period clothing of the characters as you move from century to century in the span of seconds.

Lets go finaly another vídeo about my country, Thanks for sharing !

It is important to say that becoming a monarchy after independence was essential to keep the country united.

@braziliantsar

Ай бұрын

Debatable, considering this was used as a motive to pretty much every revolt during the empire. It was mostly the centralized model that kept the country as one.

@Gustavo-wm1vl

Ай бұрын

@@braziliantsar Exato, na real nem foi tanto pelo modelo monárquico em si, foi na base da porrada msm. A elite do Rio garantiu que qualquer outra elite provincial com aspirações de autonomia se mantivesse na linha, e negociou com as que estavam dispostas a obedecer

@braziliantsar

Ай бұрын

​@@Gustavo-wm1vlSim, isso mesmo. Tanto é que a monarquia caiu exatamente porque a elite do lobby agrário viu que não teria nada a ganhar mantendo o modelo monárquico após a abolição. Feliz e infelizmente,o Brasil herdeu um modelo de elite dominante que assegurou a hegemonia nacional. O lado bom é a unidade nacional que temos, o lado ruim é o fato desse modelo permitir uma corrupção absurda que vem da colônia até hoje.

@Gustavo-wm1vl

Ай бұрын

@@braziliantsar Simm, não passava de um grande pacto, um acordão, até na independência, tudo nesse país parece convergir pra isso kk. A elite apoiava o trono de D. Pedro I, e em troca, o monarca garantia o status quo da escravidão e os privilégios da capital, e quem discordasse o kct comia forte. No decorrer do séc.XIX com o avanço das lavouras de café, a escravidão se transformou o grande alicerce do regime de fato, mais do que o status da capital. Enfim, como vc disse, infelizmente mas felizmente né, nos mantivemos unidos, ainda q na marra. Vale mencionar tmb o trabalho da nossa diplomacia, essa sim excepcional. Em praticamente TODAS as disputas territoriais, nós, através de negociações e produção de documentos, conseguirmos levar a melhor. O caso do Amapá é emblemático, conseguimos o reconhecimento sobre uma potência europeia NO SÉC XIX. Quem arbitrou a disputa se não me engano foi a Suíça. Imagina o nível de qualidade dos documentos que os caras produziram pra convencer um monarca europeu a favorecer uma ex-colônia em detrimento de uma potência estabelecida (França), foda dmais

@Gustavo-wm1vl

Ай бұрын

​@@braziliantsar Simm, tudo não passava de um grande esquemão kkk, um pacto, parece q tudo nesse país converge pra isso kk. Enfim, acho q vale destacar tmb o trabalho, esse sim, excepcional da nossa diplomacia. Conseguimos estabilizar e negociar as disputas fronteiriças com TODOS os vizinhos, isso antes mesmo do séc.XX. O caso do Amapá é emblemático, a França reivindicava todo o território, quem arbitrou a disputa foi a Suíça. Agora vc imagine, o nível de qualidade dos documentos e argumentos que os caras produziram pra convencer um EUROPEU a favorecer uma EX-COLÔNIA em detrimento de uma potência estabelecida, foda dmais

You remain to this day the undisputed goat of “I need to watch something while I eat” 2nd to none

@mel-chan5567

Ай бұрын

For real like I've watched all his videos dozens of times cause they're the perfect background noise for cooking and eating

The border disputes between the newly independent South American countries are an interesting topic. Some went on until the 1930’s! Hell, some still pop up even today, like the one between Venezuela and Guyana.

@fransbuijs808

Ай бұрын

And Bolivians would still love to get their access to the sea back.

@jacaredosvudu1638

Ай бұрын

​@@fransbuijs808damn masochists, lol

@lynxfresh5214

Ай бұрын

​@@fransbuijs808 Boliva got really done dirty in history, it went from being one of the most valuable parts of the Spanish Empire (after its independence had a lot potential promise) to a very unstable weak nation that lost land to its neighbours and between Brazil, Argentina and Chile has very little influence in South America affairs let alone Latin America at large.

@TerminatorHIX

Ай бұрын

Peru and Ecuador went to war over one of those territorial disputes in 1941.

It's unbelievable how you can explain a complex and difficult subject so well, in a simple manner and covering all the basics of the issue, also dropping a quick word about the Uruguayan independence as well just because. And all in under four minutes

*Love Brazil from Brazil.* 🇧🇷❤🇧🇷

The Iberian Union was a territorial blessing for the future Brazil - it allowed Portuguese-Brazilian explorer-trekkers (the Bandeirantes) to reach from the River Plate to the uncolonized North-Center interior of South America at a time when the Spanish were busy making colonies and mining enterprises in the surrounding Andean regions…

It’s always nice to see this channel upload a new video and not once has the content not been interesting, thanks HM

I love the video as always!

A better question is why is your channel so awesome?

At 1:28... that huge white stick, is that meant to represent the dividing line on the map?

I really like these videos that are just about a country’s borders. Keep up the good work!

Spinning Three Plates is criminally underrated

@SP-td9xj

Ай бұрын

When you say "spinning plates" it makes me think of a redpill version of Brazil's history "Spain was being a total simp and a beta so Portugal went alpha and took more land"

Another amazing video

One thing I find humorous about the Treaty of Tordesillas is that Portugal claimed that it entitled them to ALL of Africa. Pretty significant rules lawyering, and it didn't work out, but it's very audacious!

@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators

Ай бұрын

All of Africa, all of India, all of China......Everything not discovered by Europeans east of the line.

@grantorino2325

Ай бұрын

All parts of Africa *not ruled by a Christian king* . Ethiopia was very much off-limits to European colonization. 🇪🇹

@lmnop286

Ай бұрын

​@@grantorino2325It included Ethiopia. That's why the Portuguese got involved in the Horn of Africa in the mid 1500s.

Very nice seeing my country as a subject of one of this channel's videos.

Sure did enjoy! Do more videos on Brazil!

2:30 Plan: 1)Make money 2) Dont get involved Me: This advice works for so many things in life! War, relationships, family conflicts, etc.

1:15 “NO Dutchies” 💀💀💀💀💀

Yay I guessed the rainforest reason right! Thanks for the vid!

Finally a video about Brazil. Thank you.

One correction: Brazil didn't let Uruguay become independent for fear a war against Argentina. In 1828, they was already in war against Argentina from 1825 and they was losing. But Argentina was running out of money and the total victory was still far away, then UK pushed for the independence of Uruguay and UK won.

@FOLIPE

Ай бұрын

Brazil wasn't "losing", it blockeaded Buenos Aires and controlled all major cities in Uruguay. It did lose important land battles but it was far from decided.

@Argentvs

Ай бұрын

@@FOLIPE Brazil lost all land battles. They never blocked the port, William Brown entered and exited as he wishes. All attacks on Argentine coastal towns were disasters for the IMperial Navy. They lost over a dozen ships to a 5 ships flotilla. Most of the time the Brazilians were fighting sand banks as they were ignorant of the rivers and constantly were lured by Brown and got stuck.

@lucasithegreat2711

Ай бұрын

We were not loosing, the brazilian imperial navy had won most naval battles and had Buenos Aires blockaded which was strangling Argie's economy. And throughout the whole conflict for Uruguay the major cities were kept under brazilian hands and argies couldn't take them. And argies are so pathetic that their greatest military pride was a single skirmish they won in this war, when they stumbled across a brazilian reiforcments force in the countryside of Uruguay and managed to make them retreat (battle of ituzaingo). If it wasn't for Britain's intervention by ending the war prematurely Argentina would loose steam and it woudn't take long for the Empire to gather enough forces for an offensive into argentinian territory considering we had them blockaded, they couldn't kick us out of Uruguay and also couldn't push into Brazil because they didn't have manpower for it. Argentina is pathetic. They think they fought us eye to eye, we think they were a minor inconvenience in that time.

@j.c-6424

Ай бұрын

​@@lucasithegreat2711Ituzaingo = Brazilian Army annihilated.

@Argentvs

Ай бұрын

@@lucasithegreat2711 you lost ALL land battles. Your blockade was ineffective, Brown broke it at will using the tides and sand banks, you lost more ships to sandbanks that ships you fought.

Great video

Wow finally a video all about Brazil!! Awesome man! Please keep making some more Brazilian/South American history, we got a rich history down here as well!!

Loved this one!!

The only disappointment is Brazil did not gain access to the Pacific, after Brazil's Pedro I did not accept Bolivia’s offer to become a vassal.

You just missed a small little thing, the last border agreement was actually with Bolivia over a place called Acre (which doesn't exist btw). It was settled in 1903 with Brazil getting the whole territory and only paying 2 million pounds and a singular horse

As usual good video

Nice vid!

2:50 👆 You forgot one crucial event, the purchasing of Acre from Bolivia!

Brazil has a manifest destiny of her own

@MrDennisWay

Ай бұрын

Existem profecias do século XX sobre o Brazil o Quinto império é a Roma dos Trópicos.

By the way, you can still see Dutch-built buldings on the city of Recife

We have a lot of land, but it is hard to occupy everything. The majority of our people still lives nearby the coast.

@cashewnuttel9054

Ай бұрын

Give some of that land to Venezuela so that they become rich.

1:45 I think you should have used an arrow or circle or something to show where the change was, so tiny

Next video idea: *Why the 🇵🇹Portuguese let Brazil become 1 giant contry, but the 🇪🇸Spaniards divided Latin America into some 16 countries upon independence?* Nice video btw!

@Gustavo-wm1vl

Ай бұрын

It has to do with the way the spanish organized their colonies, the native empires and peoples founded in each region, and specifically in Brazil, the way our elite made a pact with the monarchy after independence, ensuring that every revolt for autonomy or rebellion was crushed. So basically, we as Brazil stayed together by force kkkk the Rio elite enforced its rule over the territory and over time created the sense of unity we share today, for better and for worse kk. In Spanish America, there were multiple centers of power, and those elites each had their own agenda and were powerful enough to revolt and enforce it, which culminated in the creation of multiple states, each one controlled by its corresponding elite

Throughout its history, Brazil engaged in treaties and diplomatic negotiations to acquire or define its borders with neighboring countries. For example, treaties such as the Treaty of Tordesillas (1494), which divided South America between Portugal and Spain, influenced Brazil's territorial boundaries. Diplomatic efforts and agreements with neighboring countries further shaped Brazil's current borders.

@Lusitanean

Ай бұрын

Actually that’s mostly wrong. Portugal was the one that made most of those treaties. The treaty of Madrid (1750) was the best example of this. A huge swap of land was traded for Cisplatina, which benefited Portugal greatly. A lot of Spaniards were angry for this treaty (rightly so)

love these videos!

Speaking of borders, video idea: Why is there that little strip of Russo-chinese border between Kazakhstan and Mongolia(if there is any reason) I'm genuinely curious

Glad it did because its shape and size looks so good on the map.

Love your videos

I expected the "short documentary" to be like a late april fools joke and actually be 60 minutes or something

It’s not just the size but the shape that’s crazy. The eastern most point of Brazil is closer to Africa than its northern most point is to the continental United States.

@ender8759

Ай бұрын

Yes. Brazil has a triangle like shape which fits very well with It's flag.

@lynxfresh5214

Ай бұрын

Kinda interesting three of the five largest nations in the world are all global powers while the 2nd (Canada) and 5th (Brazil) largest countries are only regional powers not even great powers.

@Dabeyoun

Ай бұрын

There is a Brazilian joke that goes something like... When God was creating Brazil, he didn't put any earthquakes or hurricanes, placed great weather, lots of mineral and vegetal riches. An angel, upon seeing this, wondered "Lord, what a beautiful place! It will be the closest to paradise on Earth!" to with God replied "HAH! Just wait and see what type of people I shall put there".

@andrasszabo1570

Ай бұрын

​@@lynxfresh5214 it's hard to be surprised about Canada when most of its territory is almost to entirely unsuitable to human habitation due to the cold. Same with Russia, plus they don't even have an exit to one ocean, let alone two.

@edmerc92

Ай бұрын

I agree that it's an interesting shape but ... South America is pretty far away from the USA. It's not that shocking that part of Brazil would be closer to Africa.

Brazil in foreign relations: rolls constant d20s Brazil in domestic issues: rolls d5s

Brazil mentioned! Brazil número one! 🇧🇷 🎉❤

There are two things that make this story more interesting. 1: Acre, a small corner of the Northwest, which is the most remote territory of Brazil, and all the times the country actively attemted to get rid of it. 2: The time in the 50s when the insane Brazilian president, Jânio Quadros, wanted to invade French Guiana. Because he was insane

@WallsEryx

Ай бұрын

The best part about Jânio Quadros was when he resigned expecting the population to clamour for him to stay and gain more powers... but then Brazilians were actually like "uh... ok, then. Call in the vice-president."

@braziliantsar

Ай бұрын

"Insane" just because it was the cold war and it would go extremely wrong for us, but France had been having some enormous diplomatic disrespect with us ever since the end of WW2. De Gaulle even called us an incompetent country, and during the same period of Jânio Quadros, the lobster war almost set ablaze.

@TheGrenadier97

Ай бұрын

FI-LO PORQUE QUI-LO

@LeonardoMenezes03

Ай бұрын

I would say Amapa is the most remote territory, since there's no land connection with the rest of the country. 1/3 of the population of French Guiana is brazilian (by blood or by birth).

@MrDennisWay

Ай бұрын

@@LeonardoMenezes03 assim que a França desmoronar sobre si mesma por causa da imigração nós vamos pegar a Guiana relaxa

Uruguay: the Belgium of South America

“Britain wanted to promote good relations with Buenos Aires” boy that didn’t age well

1:55 I'd be more worried about the frogs...

At 1:44, when the narration says "but at the cost of giving this to Spain.", I had no idea what had changed in the map... had to rewind a couple times until 1:58 when it was highlighted.

*I've always wondered why the 🇵🇹Portuguese let Brazil become 1 giant contry, but the 🇪🇸Spaniards divided Latin America into some 16 countries upon independence.*

Speaking of Brazil, wouldn’t the topic of the Nikkei becoming a demographic in Brazil be a charming video? Who knew there were so many Japanese-Brazilian’s in that country.

Finally a video about Brazil 😍

James Brasilonette

The Portuguese Royal Family relocated to Brazil? I want to hear more about that! You don't get a lot of colonizers moving to their own colony.

@SuperCacazinho

Ай бұрын

For a time, the Portuguese Empire capital was Rio de Janeiro

@braziliantsar

Ай бұрын

Yeah it was an effort to run away from Napoleon. It was sort of a government in exile for Portugal, and a central government in Brazil for the first time, as it stopped being a colony and became a kingdom, part of the United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil and Algarve

Thanks!

Oh ,my goodness! Thank you so much! I have for many years been curious about the Netherlands occupation of Eastern Brazil, and why the Banda Oriental was Brazilian territory before the Argentines aided an independence movement. This is exactly why I watch videos, from my favorite contributors, about questions I know the answer to.

“We have to go back to Napoleon”

James Bisonette bought the new lands for Brazil

Awesome video dude i demand you give me a tour of the kings palace

This video made me feel like playing some Sid Meier's Pirates! remake.

Brasileiros de todo o mundo, uni-vos!

A moment of silence for the loss of boogly woogly.