Holiness Seminar : Part 2 | Raymond Woodward | Goodlettsville Pentecostal Church

Connect with us on social media:
Facebook: / gvilleupc
Instagram: / gvilleupc
Twitter: / gvilleupc
Visit us on the web: www.gvillepc.com
Download our App: tithely.app.link/goodlettsvil...
#gvillepc #gpc

Пікірлер: 16

  • @gvillepentecostalchurch
    @gvillepentecostalchurch3 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for watching this message, we hope it inspired and encouraged you! Check out other sermons: kzread.info/head/PLL9x8EHxx1XPyu3qBKxMwtSh4iCAIKPuJ Check out our worship: kzread.info/head/PLL9x8EHxx1XMOOyP0nEdH2Cumhwwc7mvy Connect with us on social media: Instagram: instagram.com/gvilleupc/ Facebook: facebook.com/gvilleupc/ Twitter: twitter.com/gvilleupc/

  • @memawsstorytime8767
    @memawsstorytime87673 жыл бұрын

    It takes courage and boldness to teach holiness to this degree. So needed in this age!! Thank you Bro. Raymond Woodward!!!I’ve never heard teaching like this.

  • @lorriepulliam8687
    @lorriepulliam8687Күн бұрын

    I really ẹnoyed part 1 and 2 I use to be UPC but I got very hurt and I backsliding but I'm been saved this time for 25 years I'm pentecostal just not upci .I enjoy all your teaching is so true from the Bible thank you

  • @dentalcarediva3400
    @dentalcarediva34006 ай бұрын

    Good stuff Bro Woodword! Thank you for being willing to speak the truth, we need to hear this more!

  • @heibergutierrez6423
    @heibergutierrez64233 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for making this available to the public. I was very blessed by it. Blessings from Cypress Grove Fellowship, Orlando FL.

  • @jermaldcastleberry9748
    @jermaldcastleberry974810 ай бұрын

    My my my. I just pray that I step into this with boldness and strength. I believe in this and I appreciate the truth and direction in this message. Jesus keep me pure, safe, holy and clean. Excited for the process.

  • @DeepandraShukla
    @DeepandraShukla7 ай бұрын

    Awesome ❤

  • @biggibbz
    @biggibbz Жыл бұрын

    Tremendous conference

  • @FTW171
    @FTW1715 ай бұрын

    The best principle of distinction is a beard on a man!

  • @InsightsOnBiblicalTruthsAposto
    @InsightsOnBiblicalTruthsAposto5 ай бұрын

    I saw part one and loved it. I was all for part two until he twisted the scripture about the head. I am authentically Apostolic and I will continue to listen to Pastor Woodward, but I must speak on this error. The following scriptures are what he alluded to and yet he extrapolated the end without contextualizing the chapter. 1 Corinthians 11:3-16 KJV But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head. But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man. For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man. For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels. Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord. For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of God. After Paul gives the command, THEN he says "judge for yourself" Paul has already set the standard for men and women concerning praying and Prophesying. Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered? Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering. But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God. Then AFTER he told us to judge for yourselves and told us what nature teaches, he says, "if any man seem to be CONTENTIOUS, we have NO SUCH CUSTOM, Neither THE Churches OF GOD." We can't explain what's already plainly explained. We hold a different custom than the world does. I'm tired of people disregarding the word of God. As plain as this scripture is , there should be no confusion. In my ministry my wife and every female has to cover their head in obedience to this scripture. Let me breack this down: dishonoureth his head-not as ALFORD, "Christ" (1Co 11:3); but literally, as "his head" is used in the beginning of the verse. He dishonoreth his head (the principal part of the body) by wearing a covering or veil, which is a mark of subjection, and which makes him look downwards instead of upwards to his Spiritual Head, Christ, to whom alone he owes subjection. Why, then, ought not man to wear the covering in token of his subjection to Christ, as the woman wears it in token of her subjection to man? "Because Christ is not seen: the man is seen; so the covering of him who is under Christ is not seen; of her who is under the man, is seen" dishonoureth ... head-in that she acts against the divine ordinance and the modest propriety that becomes her: in putting away the veil, she puts away the badge of her subjection to man, which is her true "honor"; for through him it connects her with Christ, the head of the man. Moreover, as the head-covering was the emblem of maiden modesty before man (Ge 24:65), and conjugal chastity (Ge 20:16); so, to uncover the head indicated withdrawal from the power of the husband, whence a suspected wife had her head uncovered by the priest (Nu 5:18). ALFORD takes "her head" to be man, her symbolical, not her literal head; but as it is literal in the former clause, it must be so in the latter one. all one as if ... shaven-As woman's hair is given her by nature, as her covering (1Co 11:15), to cut it off like a man, all admit, would be indecorous: therefore, to put away the head-covering, too, like a man, would be similarly indecorous. It is natural to her to have long hair for her covering: she ought, therefore, to add the other (the wearing of a head-covering) to show that she does of her own will that which nature itself teaches she ought to do, in token of her subjection to man. 6. A woman would not like to be "shorn" or (what is worse) "shaven"; but if she chooses to be uncovered (unveiled) in front, let her be so also behind, that is, "shorn."

  • @egruwell
    @egruwell11 ай бұрын

    Part of this is very hard to hear! Wonderful teaching, but with the volume all the way up, still faint in some parts of the message.

  • @CokieBarker
    @CokieBarker6 ай бұрын

    r they trin or oneness?

  • @mikeeagan1307
    @mikeeagan13072 жыл бұрын

    Please give the Scriptures where Paul says to the women, "put your Veil back on because of Culture," but also to wear your hair long? Its pretty obvious about the hair as Paul brings it out, but a Veil I am not finding that Or are you embellishing on Paul's writing?

  • @GospelProgressionsUniversity

    @GospelProgressionsUniversity

    2 жыл бұрын

    Lol he embellished a whole lot with the hair doctrine.

  • @dentalcarediva3400

    @dentalcarediva3400

    6 ай бұрын

    The word covering at the end of verse 15 means a veil in the Greek.

  • @mikeeagan1307

    @mikeeagan1307

    6 ай бұрын

    @dentalcarediva3400 vs. 15 in the Greek ; "a covering " is a neutered noun its describing what the Noun is like, and that is; Hair (noun) is being used as a Veil (neutered noun). That is Hair is being used as a veil and not, a veil is to cover the hair