I been following you for a while now and we each have a specific learning curve. Yours is just right for me. I follow other creators who also have good stuff out there but I have to say your what I would call my home team! I'll be ordering your Intelligent Raw Workflow once I get some medical bills taken care of! Keep up the great content!

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Awesome! Thanks so much! I sincerely appreciate that!

Great, very useful video! I just re-ordered the Camera Raw editing panels. I bought the IP² - Intelligent Presets and Profiles for ACR and Lightroom and Filter Set a few weeks ago. ACR and Lightroom are now set up to get the best results possible, thanks to Blake. Blake's devotion to color theory in Photoshop has been of inmensurable help to thousands of photographers all over the world. Thank you again. (BTW, I also bought Palette Effects III. Again, wonderful instruction and you get a PS Plugin too!)

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Wow! Thank you so much for your awesome feedback of my work. It means so much to me to hear that.

Great update and thanks Blake !

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

My pleasure!

Best content I saw in a while!

@f64Academy

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks!

Thanks, Blake. I just wanted to know how to move the order of the edit panels (after a software update moved them back to default) and Googling didn't help, so I came straight to your channel. Excellent information.

@f64Academy

Жыл бұрын

Glad I could help 😁

There seems to be a trend in Blake's comment sections of people saying that they think Blake is the best Photoshop educator on KZread. Well... I'm in that club! I've signed up for quite a few photography KZread channels and a few classes too. I like many of them but Blake Rudis is on another level altogether. He's engaging and has an ordered and well rehearsed teaching style that just cuts to the point. I have been so impressed that I signed up for Blake's F64 elite package and I haven't been disappointed. If you think the F64 KZread channel is good, the subscription courses will blow your mind. Blake has completely changed the way I see photography and how I use Photoshop. The only warning I would give is that if you are prone to binge watching great content, then brace for impact with F64 Elite :🤣

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Oh wow! This is incredible to read, but even better on a Monday morning. I really appreciate you and thank you for placing your trust in me 😁

It may depend on what you shoot. Since I have a lot of architecture in my photos, my workflow is flatten image, geometry, and optics. Once I know what the photo will look like, I start the processing. Then once I have that right, I start with the basic and detail. The rest I usually do in Photoshop as I often use masks for color grading and curves. Curves and Calibration, I do close to last as I set them differently for print output or video display output. Then save as a PSD either using the print or display folder as needed when I go back to it in the future. In the old print days I had 3 version depending on the light the print would be viewed under. Today I just adjust them for daylight. Although I also do them my color tuning. My scenic and portraits of course I may not use everything. Still I love the idea of putting them in the best order for me and would not have considered it without your video. Thank you.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

I see your reasoning there. Although the calibration section can give you some incredible colors in your image you could be missing out on ;) try it out! For my architecture work I prefer photoshop for the geometry stuff. That way if it crops in too far, I can still get some stuff back on the edges with content aware fill. Usually helps save some compositions that may crop in too far with the regular geometry section. Just a thought for ya.

@DeMorcan

3 жыл бұрын

@@f64Academy Having seen an earlier video of yours, I do use it as part of my color tuning. Generally as an adjustment on a smart object so I can mask it. BTW the video about luminosity in the color grading sure saves me some time on my monochrome images. I used that with blend and balance sliders to quickly make a balanced B&W without the time of luminosity masks in Photoshop for someone and sold the image after a minutes of work. If I were not retired on social security of if the tourists were shopping at the gallery, I would be looking at some of your courses and products.

You got it right 🥰 love your work

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you! I really appreciate it!

Difficult things in photoshop , very easy to understand .. Excellent

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

I do my best 😁

Nice Blake! Gonna try this as my default setup from now on....because I trust you ;-)

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

😎

Very interesting, ty, I'm going to give it a try, though I made the small adjustment of adding the optics and geometry first as I pretty much always tick the optics boxes first and though I rarely use the geometry, if the photo needs it, it gets done before anything else. I do have a question on the curves though. The position you place it in makes sense, but prior to doing any culling I apply a preset that includes a couple basic adjustments and an curve that provides some moderate contrast to make the photos a bit better when as I cull which I will fine tune later. What I'm wondering is with this change, should I be resetting any of those adjustments when I start working on the real edit or just don't do anything else with the curve until its turn comes around? Again, thanks for the video, I never knew I could change the order, which I've wanted to do, and wouldn't have thought to order it this way even if I had.

This guy is good. I watch A LOT of different photoshop channels and I'd say he's one of the top two educators on here...

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Wow! Thanks so much 😎

@CUADRADITOSS

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah! Educators like him has a lot more knowledge than Adobe 🤣

I wish I had more time to watch you videos! This is my take. All RAW processing is about taking 14-bit data (or 42-bit full color) and fitting it into 8-bit (or 24-bit full color). Photo editors try to make it look like you have a gazillion special tricks to deal with the image, but really, it all comes down to one simple question per pixel--what color will it end up on an 8-bit display. When you use a curve to maximize all the red you are basically setting every red to a 255 value (or 217/33/33 for best psychological effect). So of course you can't reduce the value using color because there are no values from 0 to 254. I would have put selections like "optics" last because they move pixels around on the image matrix, but don't change their color value (which again, is the only thing we can really do per pixel color). I would have put "Color Grading" higher because it changes color values, not position like optics. (If I didn't take it out entirely ;) ) Again, I see only one ultimate decision. There are many ways to get there. You are one of the first videos I've seen that points out many of these methods are duplicative and if you don't do them in the order best for your purposes you end up making a mess of things because you can't re-heat milk ;)

@f64Academy

2 жыл бұрын

Very true. But, I would argue it all comes down to the viewers experience. I am not concerned with displays and bits. At the end of the day all I need to do is ensure I put all my effort into the image to ensure it creates the same experience I had (or better sometimes) for the viewer. No matter what the display may be ;)

@MaxoticsTV

2 жыл бұрын

@@f64Academy Thanks for the reply! My bugbear is the bits matter. It's like saying the contrast of the photo paper didn't matter back in the day ;) Or the grain of film, etc. There used to be a joke about NTSC video (Never The Same Color) which applies to today's displays. So I hear you there. Totally out of one's control. Going back to that analogy. One could use show a very grainy result using a fine-grained filmed with a high-contrast paper, right? Or they could use a very grainy film with a low contrast paper. Both have their advantages. Are they the same? My bugbear again is understanding that you can't re-develop a low contrast film if you used the grainy film as a start. In digital, that means understanding what has the bits and what doesn't. Further, how those bits relate to the GAMMA of your display. I don't believe your viewers can REALLY understand what you're saying if they don't understand this low level sht ;) Can they replicate what you do? ABSOLUTELY. Is that important? It's the only thing important. Until you run into a problem and spend hours trying to fix something that can't be fixed because you don't understand these fundamentals. There's a lot you know that your viewers don't because you don't want to scare them off with bit-talk. I understand. Nonetheless, you're miles ahead of everyone else (other photo channels). So thank you! I've always been annoyed at ACR but have never been able to figure out that nagging thing until this video!

Great point

Thanks!

One of your most helpful tips. However, I always use Optics first to apply automatic lens correction. Am I missing something? Thanks.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

I've answered this in a ton of comments. This is really about how tones and colors are affected. Optics can be done at anytime really, it's like a wildcard.

Re-ordering (and removing unused) Panes has been in Lightroom Classic for a while, but I never noticed it in ACR. Good to know, thanks.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing!

you're great, thanks

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Aw thanks, you're great too 😁

Great thought process as usual! One question - why aren't Optics higher on your list? Removing CA and setting the lens profile would seem to be critical at the very start of the process, along with colour profile? If not, why do you see things differently?

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

This is mainly for how your tones and colors are read and their priority. I'd say optics is a wild card, you can do it anywhere.

Thanks for your video! how come your tab shows Profile while in my newest version it shows Lens Correction? did you change the name of the tab or is it an earlier version?

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Thats what mine says, not sure why yours doesnt

@aaz148a

3 жыл бұрын

@@f64Academy Maybe in Lightroom its different than in Camera Raw, anyway no worries, under Lens Correction there are 2 tabs for Profile and Manual, I guess its another settings

Thank you

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

You're welcome

I rearranged my Lightroom panel according to your convincing suggestions. I am curious how that will work out for me.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Me too 😁

Yay thanks for this

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

My pleasure!

@nicolaussuryadharma

3 жыл бұрын

@@f64Academy before i saw this on your youtube channel, i don’t even know how to edit in a good way step by step what come first and etc. Thank’s dude, greetings from Bali

I do first optics, because specially vignette changes your highlights and then you have to go back to basics again.

What's the new order of the panels for ACR 16? Now that panels have been broken up into smaller pieces.

@f64Academy

6 ай бұрын

Same really, I just put color under light and then calibration under that.

The difference is that the tone curve is adjusting input values; and adjusting the red channel of the RGB color mix doesn't necessarily result in red output. But the color mixer is adjusting the image colors. Also, the color mixer colors are a range more akin to the HSL scale displayed in PS when you select red; whereas the red tone curve is only the R value in the RGB mix. It appears to me that your red input shift resulted in mostly magenta colors; so the magenta color mixer would/should have had a notable impact on the displayed image (or maybe purple/blue?).

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

I did try all sliders before the tutorial. No effect 😔

@stevenkersting3494

3 жыл бұрын

@@f64Academy I get a different result with my own images (i.e. some effect). But to correct all of it may require a WB adjustment... because an R channel shift is essentially a WB shift. To see the relationship better start with a color that HSL will affect in the image. For your example image the luminance of blue would be good, and shift it back/forth/reset. Then do the red curve adjustment followed by the blue luminance... the luminance adjustment will/should affect the same areas to the same degree. The two just don't correlate. But I guess it does become less intuitive if you adjust a color curve first... luckily, I never do that in LR 😃

Just subscribed. I am starting to get into photography. I come from a video background. Color correction and exposure needs to happen first and the grade needs to happen last. I see too much emphasis on the grade, but it is a very small part of the process.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Absolutely!

My issue is around "Detail". I thought it important to minimise noise early in your workflow as other processes may increase any noise. Realise that sharpening needs to be later in the workflow (if not one of the last things I do), but go for noise reduction early. A bit academic for my workflow really as I use LR and the noise reduction applied is usually minimal in LR as I move to Define 2 for any serious noise reduction and if sharpening is required, I tend to do that last in PS

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

I think there is a lot of old adages to be and sharpening and where to do them. Basically, in the raw workflow you can do it almost wherever, but the sharpening should be subtle. Better to selectively sharpen in Ps at the end for sure, but I just do subtle NR at the raw level really.

@mattbarneveld815

3 жыл бұрын

@@f64Academy thanks for your thoughts mate. Makes sense :-)

This is good to consider and can lead to a better foundational/reasoned workflow, but I wouldn't say this solves any big issues regarding creating an artistically solid image. I'll try to get back here to explain why when I have more time. Thank you for the video.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

It certainly does when you know what order to do things. Makes a huge difference.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

The entire IP2 course I built focuses on this idea and how to make better artistic shots with the knowledge.

@duaneshort186

3 жыл бұрын

@@f64Academy Cool. So, what my experience is comes from editing a lot of images in various programs. I disliked Lightroom from the first time I used it; a trial copy that shipped with CS 5 way back when. I could do what I needed in ACR, but mostly didn't like the results I got from it, though looking back it was mostly just not "knowing the rules", which I eventually learned . . . make the thing look good to my eye and vision for the photograph. Anyway, I ended up trying many different RAW conversion software offerings and would usually be blown away with how much better they worked than ACR, or some other app I was using, in one or a few aspects. Without fail, however, I noticed in time that there were ways in which those apps fell short of the previous "best." I was all excited about Photo Ninja a long time ago, eventually started using Capture One, and more recently used DXO PhotoLab and Luminar 4. I still use C1, DXO and Luminar. They are all very, very good in their own ways, and weak in their own ways also. Interestingly, I am much, much more proficient in each of these apps because of using all three, plus ACR (rarely). I can learn and see the differences in how they treat files. I have a really good idea of how I can make a file look in each app, how far I can push it in one way, how much more I could go that same way in another app, and what the tradeoff will be for choosing one app over the other. What I came to know is, no matter what I want to do, almost invariably I will be required to jump back and forth to tweak many settings. If I want to add a little of one thing, I know it is going to affect something else that will need re-adjusting, unless I'm lucky (also rarely). And this implies that the order of tweaks, though wise to have ordered according to preferences, will always require jumping back and forth. I've lately been considering the quote attributed to Bruce Lee - "I fear not the man who has practiced 10,000 kicks once, but I fear the man who has practiced one kick 10,000 times." Wise and true words that hold for any RAW editing app . . . but there is also truth in the idea of knowing other kicks even if only for the sake of better understanding the kick one has practiced 10,000 times. I blame no one for sticking to one solid RAW editor and learning it in and out, but I think exploring and using alternative options will help understand how best to use the one you most prefer. And any way one may go, he or she is gonna be jumping back and forth between sliders and options until what they see is what they "see." - Best to you. I really appreciate the video.

For me, optics, white balance, basic, curves, calibration, hsl, detail and colour grading if needed before going into PS. Only use curves for luminosity.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

True, but, that's not the order that ACR prioritizes the effects. That's the order you may work in, but that's not what ACR or LR stacks in order of importance as it applies to the image. That;s what I am showing here.

I did the update for ACR 13.2 but can't get the system to allow me to put the pallets in the order I choose. Any tips on what's going on?

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

I have no idea. Just make sure you are using the up and down arrow keys after you highlight the one you want to move. I haven't run into any issues with it,

For me it's crop, straightening and lens corrections first and sharpening last, then everything else in between.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Those can be done everywhere and anywhere. What I'm showing here is how it prioritizes the tone and color effects.

as always blake is excellent

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you 😁

Have you tried the new enhance feature?

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Yep, I've experimented with it. It's cool, I guess, I just don't do much of that stuff. I already have a 42 Megapixel camera.

Every time Adobe asks for comments on Lightroom, I request that it be possible for the user to change the order of operations, just as you can change the order of adjustment layers in Photoshop. I suspect they won't do it because of possible confusion and gross changes to archived work if the program doesn't archive the order of operation in the catalog or .XMP file. I use Photoshop to correct scans of faded film by correcting the overall tint with a curves layer and then adding a hue/saturation adjustment. You can't do this in Lightroom, simply because it always performs the hue/saturation adjustment before the curves.

Adobe applies adjustments in an Adobe defined order. The sequence you apply your edits is totally irrelevant. Do the order how it makes you happy, there is no right and wrong. If that's what the creator ends up saying, my apologies for turning him off fairly quickly. That's from an editing pov. From a cpu pov, the default order is the most efficient. As one goes down the list, reprocessing the entirety of the adjustments (with whatever was last applied) becomes less efficient. No one needs to trust me, this is all old hat and any number of Adobe trainers, as well as Adobe, have said this countless times.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Absolutely! Do them in any order. What I'm showing here though is how Adobe had defined what order takes priority. It's good to know.

Thanks for the info! :)

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

You bet!

That's why Capture one is so Usefull (or use photoshop). Because you can create a Layer and decide yourself the order. I think is time for ADOBE to introduce some very basic layer managment in Lightroom without getting in the PS level. Just basic Layer with opacity would make everyone 100% happy opening tons of possibility. Great video btw

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

I understand why they don't though they keep it all Raw level based, it makes sense. I use Photoshop exclusively for layers also, but knowing this raw level information and how to get the best color and tone is critical before going into PS. Get the most you can out of that raw file before going into PS. Squeeze all the juice!

@Jean-bs5ip

3 жыл бұрын

@@f64Academy The thing is that If know i need to do a lot of processing I would just use Capture One because it's very convinient to have all your layers and be able to recall or change every single step from importing the raw to the final product The only reason they didn't it's because it would cut some people from using PS at all

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

I don't think that's why Adobe didn't have that feature. I mean why would it matter? You get Ps and LR for one price now? I think they just prefer to keep features where they are best suited.

@Jean-bs5ip

3 жыл бұрын

@@f64Academy ok let's make an example. You open your raw on ACR you start editing with your layers. At some point you wanna lift your shadows just a bit. 1) you go back to your background layer or if you have performed some clone stamps you have to convert in a smart object and then open again with ACR. At this point you start seeing that this process is not flowless because you can't always go back and edit every single thing in a non destructive way. If you works for you ok, but that doesn't mean that things could be achieved in a more smart and efficent way. Workflow wise if you can get everything in one step why bother using two of them. TIFF will not retain all the RAW data that you wanna might change later. you have to go back.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

I only use ACR for raw edits, there's really not that much that needs to be reworked in the raw. So I don't think we work the same way 😁 once I'm done in the Raw I rarely, if ever go back. I rarely, if ever, open a raw file as a smart object to go back. Most everything else can be done in Ps with no problems so I don't need to go back. It all depends on the individual workflow, but that's how I operate and how I teach my students. To each their own for sure!

Was someone at adobe listening to you when you released the profile course? Nice little guide on the new ACR update... 👍

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

I know right?!?!

Blake, shouldn't noise reduction be closer to the top??? Why would one edit a bunch of noise pixels and have them affect the overall edit?? It makes more sense to eliminate or reduce those pixels first. Just started following you... great tutorials... you're covering areas that many others don't. Very much appreciated!!!

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

No necessarily, it wont affect your tones and colors too much therefore you could almost do it wherever. What I am showing here is the importance of where your tones and colors will be affected. Thanks for subscribing! I appreciate it!

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Also, you won't know how much noise to reduce if you don't get your tones right first. So opening those tones will exacerbate noise in dark areas. If you do it first, you may have to go back to it after modifying your tones and therefore do the same step twice.

@bjstefaniuk

3 жыл бұрын

@@f64Academy I've seen a recent push to apply noise reduction at the RAW level and before any other editing. I understand how the tonals affect noise so it makes more sense to work the tonals first, then apply NR.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Yep, I prefer noise reduction at the raw level

Blake, Namaste, You always do some extra from other here in You Tube.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks 😁 I try to show unique stuff here. I appreciate you for watching!

Cap just called. He wants his shield back.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Nope! Not happening!

Another Home Run!

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

:) thanks so much :)

Thank you for this tutorial and the information about HOW to physically reorder the panels as this wasn't particularly obvious to me when I saw that the update now allows us to do it. Did you know about the other ACR change by the way? In the colour mixer section, the targeted adjustment tool now has a new onscreen pointer giving the position of the shadows, midtones and highlights when you move it.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Glad it was helpful! I am slowsly unpacking the new ACR and delivering smaller tutorials as I see fit instead of one mega video ;) The new TAT is showing you not the shadows and highlights, but what the result will be of a movement to the left or right. So if you are in Luminance it shows lights and darks. In the hue it will change to varying colors on the slider of the color you are in and in the Saturation it will change to a variation between grey and more saturated color. Pretty awesome!

@davidholdstock

3 жыл бұрын

@@f64Academy Thank you for explaining exactly what that does. When I wrote the first comment, I must admit, I wasn't sure I was describing it correctly!:)

Just noticed that the Targeted Adjustment Tool in the Color Mixer panel has a new on-screen display.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Pretty cool, huh?!?

@robertstonephoto

3 жыл бұрын

@@f64Academy More color feedback always better!

@colinweir5807

3 жыл бұрын

@@robertstonephoto I noticed it also. Jury still out for me though as changes always take me a while. Do you know if you can be turn th display off ?

Thank you for sharing this Blake, it makes sense. So, why does Adobe set the order of the tabs the way they do?

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

I have no idea 💡 I don't work for them, I just deconstruct their madness 🤣

Mine is calibration first, but I'm still using CS6

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

This does not apply to cs6

That's why all operations in Lightroom should be just layers so you could apply them in the order you want

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Nah, that would kind of defeat the purpose of speed, lol, everyone complains about the speed now, add layers, psshhhht, done for 🤣🤣🤣

How come geometry should be one of the bottom panels??

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Because it doesn't affect the outcome of the colors or tones, and I also don't use it much, I do that in Ps

Thank Blake, love this type of info. Just a tip to remember the order - Profile on top, Color Grading on the bottom and everything else in alphabetic order lol

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Hey that's pretty good!!!

what about lightroom menu order???

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

I don't use Lightroom, but Lr and ACR use the same editing engine, so the order is the same.

What?! I didn't realize you could re-order them or they were kinda out of order. Can't wait to try this out after work tonight.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

It's new with ACR 13.2 :)

Your Photoshop experiences go way beyond mine. However, I wonder whether you're correct about your placement of "Details." Here's why I ask. When I have a very noisy image, I prefer Topaz DeNoise filters; they are better than what Adobe offers. In a tutorial done by the owner of Topaz, he states that noise reduction should always be one of the FIRST processes of any workflow. He shows how Topaz software analyzes an unprocessed image by looking for the raw noise pattern and then removes the noise accordingly. Then he shows how manipulating an image before doing noise reduction confuses the DeNoise software (because the noise pattern has been disturbed), and this results in a significantly degraded image. In conclusion, placing noise reduction so far down in the workflow chain would seem to me to produce less than stellar images. Your thoughts?

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Details can really be done anywhere in the Raw Workflow.. This is more about time and color effects.

The VERY first thing I do is to check "Remove Chromatic Aberration" and the Lens Profile checkbox. Is that what you mean when you said the "Profile" should come first? BTW we get the benefit of your exhaustive ACR research. Thx.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Those are both very helpful, but the profile is something different. Usually Adobe Color is fine, but I go to some extremes in my courses. I really like to experiment 🤓

Shouldn't optics be the first thing we do after profile? As far as I know I should correct lenses deformation and choose a profile to start working on the photo. If you think it shouldn't, please explain to me why.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

That can be done anywhere, this is really about the priority of tones and colors and how they interact. Optics is a wild card, do it anywhere 🤣

@marcelofarah8657

3 жыл бұрын

@@f64Academy Thanks.

Hmmm. You did not prove your point (although I do trust you and believe you!). Why did you not repeat the process with the different order and finish your demonstration?

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

Because some things I have to get paid for 😁 I gave you an example here. The rest of those examples are in the course. If I gave it all away here thered be no point to get my course material. I have three very hungry boys to feed 🤣

@stevedell4617

3 жыл бұрын

@@f64Academy Watch the Intelligent Profiles and Presets and you'll know why this order is correct. Blake really digs thru the weeds to prove what he showed in this video is actually correct!! Just waiting for these updates to hit Lightroom

I'm using Photoshop since the year 2000 and I've never ever used curve ! I edit tons of RAW images everyday without using it ! I really don't feel the need for this feature ! what am I missing ? what Curves give me that no other features do ?

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

A lot! Lol it's like 3 dimensional tone editing!

@abdurrahmanmoustapha

3 жыл бұрын

@@f64Academy aren't the Exposure/Shadows/Highlights/Whites/Blacks enough ? do you a video for Curves in your channel ?

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

They are, for sure. But the curve gives you one more "layer" of control.

Thats not entirely true. Ive spend countless hours only to discover there are no right or wrong.

@f64Academy

3 жыл бұрын

You are correct. There is no real right or wrong. This is just a really good practice 😁