There will never be another tennis genius like Feds.

@stepaushi

3 ай бұрын

How can you predict the future?

As a big FED fan of course I like to see that - but, man, Andy's serve was such an insane weapon! It took all of Fed's magic to hold against it.

Roddick spent so much energy adjusting his baggy shirt…only if he got fitted shirts like Federer, life would have been easier…

There's a version of this match with commentary by Ted Robinson, John McEnroe and Andre Agassi where Agassi explains the difference between playing Peter and Roger. He said Pete would play average the whole match and brilliant for 10 minutes and you'd lose by the same score no matter how YOU played. But, if you played Roger, he could squeeze you from anywhere on the court at any time in the match and you could play your best tennis and still lose 6-1, 6-2.

@SwimKam

3 ай бұрын

He wishes. Agassi was always outdone by Sampras. Pure class.

If there were medals for press conferences, A-Rod would have won a lot of gold...😂

That Fed was unplayable

Andy's net game was subpar cuz he didn't put shots away. When Fed plays shots at the net, he puts it away to the corners or to the side. instead Andy just blocks the shots at the net and let them hang around randomly allowing Fed to get to them. Then he's just left dangling vulnerable. So in that aspect, he didn't really play lights out. He played his best, perhaps, but he left much on the table, which Fed didn't need to ask twice to take from.

Roddick tried hitting with 100% power in every ground stroke, then approached the net without expecting Federer to return a high-quality wide-angle deep ball, resulting in the loss of many points.

Federer is the one and only. The GOAT.

@malswansky3376

2 ай бұрын

Federer is unique, but the GOAT speaks Serbian!

@Jonathan-mp3ju

2 ай бұрын

@@malswansky3376 Federer is the MJ and Tiger Woods of men's tennis. Everyone else are simply stats kings like Lebron James and Bill Russell.

@malswansky3376

2 ай бұрын

@@Jonathan-mp3ju Lol, about that comparison -- as far as I know MJ didn't get his butt kicked 1-4 in the finals by his main rival -- and if it were to happen, nobody on earth would've called him GOAT, well except perhaps lunatics like you. That fact is, Djokovic has passed Federer a while ago, and that gap can only get bigger.

One of the great matches by Roger.😍

Without the big serve this would have been much worse

Roddick had zero tennis iq

@randolphpinkle4482

Ай бұрын

Roddick was way too emotional.

When you have to say "come on" when holding serve....... You know you are out gunned

No one has ever played that well. Ever !

@Luchon20082010

3 ай бұрын

Indeed, Roddick at his best was unbeatable as this match showed so

@sergelu

3 ай бұрын

@@Luchon20082010 And so powerful too! Just incredible

Never has someone played so incredibly well and still lost the match.

Roddick just played his usual losing strategy but with more energy.

@Kidgloves1984

3 ай бұрын

The agressive strategy was right in my view..just a few tactical mistakes on approach shots.

@jeffrey3498

3 ай бұрын

@@Kidgloves1984 Maybe. But playing a genius like Roger, the standard ATP tour play tactics will not cut it. You need something like Djokovic’s human backboard robotics, or Nadal’s extreme topspin attacking Roger’s backhand, but at the end of Roger’s career he figured out how to neutralize Nadal’s topspin. Djokovic was a work in progress for Roger, but father time had other plans.

@Kidgloves1984

3 ай бұрын

Roger at his most dominant prime years 2004-2007 was a nightmare..

@jeffrey3498

3 ай бұрын

@@Kidgloves1984 Absolutely! The best tennis I’ve ever witnessed, going back to 1972.

@rubenmartinez6796

3 ай бұрын

Yeah, Roddick had a really bad habit of coming to net on Rogers forehand. @Kidgloves1984

What a wild, over-swinging, floppy player Roddick was, sort of crazed wildness without strategy.

Quizzical toys ...Rubics.

It seems the consensus among the majority of tennis fans is that Joke is the "stat" vulture/ weak era GOAT (thanks to too many Berritini/ Ruud/ Tsitsipas/ Norrie Opens) while Federer is seen as the true GOAT. I'm happy most people know the truth!

@MistahhMingus

3 ай бұрын

His fans would say otherwise but yeah can norrie in the semis at Wimbledon, followed by Berretini in the final, 😬 as well as his AO 23 draw which was piss easy

@tomsd8656

3 ай бұрын

There's no such thing as a "consensus" on GOAT. Each person has his own GOAT.

@franciscohoyos-bq1xf

3 ай бұрын

We may or may not like Nole, but the figures do not allow discussion. We should not confuse playing style, which is somewhat subjective, with numbers that are cold. I like Federer's way of playing better, but Djokovic surpassed him and everyone so far.

@Jitesh108

3 ай бұрын

Agreed…I personally don’t go with stats alone. For me playing style, finesse, creative shot making is what defines a GOAT and for me it’s Federer!

@alessiomasala9417

3 ай бұрын

😂😂 among Federer fans for sure..among ppl that understand tennis everyone says that Roger had a free pass for 5 years from 2004 to 2008. But hey, you guys keep coming up with excuses to justify that Roger not only is not the goat but he is not even the 2nd best😂

Roddick was good enough in his prime to win multiple Grand Slams but Federer was great enough to stop him. Roddick interviews Federer: kzread.info/dash/bejne/n66Emo9tdJPVado.htmlsi=JflXHB79h_wF2WA_

Jimmy Connor.

Kuhio Guio'. Mofis Career tennis.

Roddick stupid play/backhand sitters/short balls lost him key points

Don't break strings too fast.

Yep fed ex is the greatest player that ever lived

Roddick could have won if he stayed back. Why did he approach?

Groumet and tension. Weight... Balance . String product name grips picture. Money wage and earnnings' K unit. Metric talent. Boozer. Beer ... Cooking...

Defense lob...

For me to understand, if you upload this US Open proprietary video on your channel - do you NOT get a copy-right strike ?

Laptop.

When Nadal came and soon became better than Federer, I wish always that Federer win, because Nadal seem like a bad boy. But even that way, Federer accept to give his crow to Nadal. When Djokovic came in a warrior style like a viking and not like a Federer behavior, Federer come down in my concept, for did not recognize the Djokovic talent and superiority !!

Why zoom in so much? I can’t even see the bottom player, unbearable to watch

Use computer.

He played much better than Federer in the first two sets, destroying Federer both winners and performance wise but sadly struggled in the crucial points

@GregLohr

3 ай бұрын

The one who plays better wins the set.

@NotSettlingForSecondBest

3 ай бұрын

I would disagree that the one who plays better always wins the set. There were many matches by Lindsay Davenport for example where she played better than her opponents but still lost. In the 2005 Wimbledon final against Venus she was ahead almost the entire match but still lost after a back injury in the final 5 service games. She held match points and lost.

This video is sped up

I watched tennis cause of him

Roddick played brainless tennis, only his serve was dangerous. By such opponents it was easy for roger.

If only we could get rid of that stupid second serve, we might see more interesting matches - not going 90% to the server.

I'm sorry but I never liked that Federer tuxedo outfit.

@annewalden3795

3 ай бұрын

CHill well he did not wear it all the time .

Its amazing how people call Djoker the stat-vulture when he literally dominated the era of the Big 3, which is clearly the most stacked era in tennis history. Meanwhile Fed did most his winning before the Big 3 even became a thing, against a bunch of 1 slam wonders or Berdych and Nalbandian. Total joke. The guy who dominated Big 3 era had it easy, and the guy who dominated a bunch of nobodies but then could barely win once the Big 3 happened had the harder road? Ridiculous

Seriously people fed ex is the.greatest players that ever lived the most skilled