I tried to start a respectful discussion backed up by historical references which can all be found on ENGLISH SITES. non of my materials came from Chinese references. i even read all my references ALOUD in the video, and if you watched the video, you will realize that my main arguing points came from books written by Korean authors. and yet it seems that a large portion of the comment section didn't even watch the video before making a comment. swearing, spamming, attacking me personally, attacking other nations and calling names will not make you right. it will only make you look more ignorant

@ShiyinOfficial

3 жыл бұрын

(btw, i can see the average watch time of this video in the content creator page. and guess how long that is? only 2 minutes. 2 minutes into this video i haven't even gotten to the main argument yet. so unless you watched the full video, pls think again before commenting)

@user-ko5lk5if5w

3 жыл бұрын

토론같은소리하네.

@user-ko5lk5if5w

3 жыл бұрын

@@ShiyinOfficial 굳이 다보고 조회수올려줄생각없고 다른 컨텐츠에서 보고 왔음

@alannalu9608

3 жыл бұрын

姐姐，支持你！谢谢你upload 这个视频！你真的真的很棒！！！

@user-ot7ej8gh5w

3 жыл бұрын

姐姐加油

I am Japanese. Japanese textbooks say that Japanese culture, including kimono and Zen, evolved from ancient Chinese culture. Japan respected the culture of Tang and Song and achieved its own development to become Japanese culture. 私は日本人です。日本の教科書には、着物や禅をはじめとする日本の文化は、古代中国の文化から発展したものであると書かれています。日本は唐や宋の文化を尊敬し、独自の発達を遂げて日本文化になったのです。

@user-jy2bx6hf5t

2 жыл бұрын

Stop stealing !

@user-jy2bx6hf5t

2 жыл бұрын

Happy Korean Christmas Happy Korean Easter Happy Korean Diwali Happy Korean Halloween!

@Ann-qi6wd

2 жыл бұрын

Stop lying! Stop cheating! Stop stealing!

@user-ph7dg5mm4r

2 жыл бұрын

ええ。。日本は 全部中国か。。オ-ケ めでたしめでたし

@katieshi1

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you. I respect your honoring the history. There are many Korean online trying to back stapping Chinese by their fake account.

The Japanese never deny their Chinese cultural origin, and they evolved very well, that’s why Chinese people respect them despite historical wars. Think about what Korean netizens do

@sara.cbc92

5 ай бұрын

Japanese overall are definitely better in this respect. Korea is extremely arrogant when it comes to things like culture, race and blood. Infact it's downright dangerous.

@user-wn5um9ck3y

5 ай бұрын

중국인들은 착각속의 세상에 빠져있다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 전 세계가 가장 싫어하는 나라가 중국인 이유가 뭘까?

@nmsllol

5 ай бұрын

@@user-wn5um9ck3y Korean constitution was written in Chinese lol

@user-wn5um9ck3y

5 ай бұрын

​@@nmsllol한국 헌법은 한국어로 적혀있다😂😂 너는 중국 언론의 피해자고 중국이 전세계 1위 비호감 국가라는것도 모르고있네 그 이유가 뭘까?

@random_guy1084

5 ай бұрын

@@nmsllol C constitution has copied Soviet consititution, and J constitution was made by US.

Fun fact: In China, people on Internet are getting used to use the country flag of korea to represent the verb "steal", for example: what a interesting meme, let me 【🇰🇷】it

@CKrdogM

13 күн бұрын

一个连国旗都是由中国道教八卦图为元素设计的国家，文化不自信是正常的

When people think about great, ancient civilizations they don't think about Korea. They think about China, Egypt, Maya, Greece, Rome. It's an insult to compare China and Korea in the same sentence.

@random_guy1084

6 ай бұрын

We K people don’t care about how the world people think about K for ancient civilization. *We are interested in what the world thinks of us today.* The reason why it is important for us to make efforts to reveal the truth about ancient history is not to brag to the world, but to enable ourselves and East Asians to know their roots. In other worlds, efforts to understand ancient history correctly without distortion are for ourselves and East Asian people, not for the rest of the world.

@random_guy1084

6 ай бұрын

C and J people are too much care about how the world see and think of them. Your comment also reflects that. C people look at everything (including culture and ancient history) from the perspective of profit and loss (利害得失). The reason C people extremely dislike K culture becoming world-famous is because they think it is a loss for them.

@random_guy1084

6 ай бұрын

In my observation, among East Asians, only K people can study ancient history objectively based on facts without distortion, and can accept newly discovered ancient historical facts without hesitation even if they are against our national interests. C and J can never accept the new fact if it is against their national interests. This is because C people act based on profit and loss (得失), J people act based on harmony (服從, 和) within the established hierarchy, but K people value justice (義). That’s why C people cannot bear 不益 while K people cannot bear 不義. When it comes to ancient history also, C can never bear 不益. J people also can never say or accept the newly discovered truth if it is against their established national belief because 和(harmony) is more important than the truth for J people.

@random_guy1084

6 ай бұрын

Ultimately, 天 blesses those who pursue justice and truth. According to [三國遺事], the founding ideology of Gojoseon was 弘益人間 which means *“widely benefit the human world”.* What a beautiful and philanthropic founding ideology suitable for the 21st century. All East Asians were born from K people, which means K people are their biological parents. *Everything is to be done as it is said: K people are parents and exist to widely benefit the human world.* That’s why getting closer to K and befriending K people bring blessings.

@Sheepybearry

4 ай бұрын

@@random_guy1084 They don't though.

Hanbok is korean Kimchi is Korean Hanfu is diffrent to hanbok Hanfu is chinese Paochai is Chinese

@user-jj2nx1hz1z

2 жыл бұрын

Agree

@user-qk6wt5zm8j

2 жыл бұрын

Wym u guys copy everything in other country

@user-jj2nx1hz1z

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-qk6wt5zm8j son is telling his mother that she looks like him, and that,s what u guys defining plagiarism.

@user-qk6wt5zm8j

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-jj2nx1hz1z By seeing the attitude of China?

@xinyiquan666

2 жыл бұрын

both hanbok and kimchi are copy of chinese hanfu and paocai, there are history record to prove this, pretty much everything in korea is copy from china

我是土生土长的马来西亚华人，我知道我的祖先是在战争的时候被逼到马来西亚当苦工的，之后就定居在马来西亚了，马来西亚保留了人很多中国的习俗和文化，除了汉服，在马来西亚基本没有多少人了解汉服，都是知道韩服和日本的和服，我也是到了中国留学才喜欢上汉服，了解了汉服，希望汉服可以一直流传下去。汉服也是很漂亮得而且历史更悠久的。希望汉服可以让更多人看到啊！

@disordermental3084

3 жыл бұрын

看到了，被韓國人竊取了

@youaresabi5578

3 жыл бұрын

我也想不到以前作為我們的屬國，現在都這麼跳了。

@TeddyLikesGame

3 жыл бұрын

傳播和繼承需要我們的努力！我家已經囤了很多漢服了，每年去國外旅遊都帶好幾套去。等疫情結束，我就可以穿漢服遊走東京街頭了⋯

@user-bw8hd8ew2z

3 жыл бұрын

马来西亚有汉服社了，好多华人参加这类活动

@shay3013

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-bw8hd8ew2z 我知道有一些 但是还是太少了 我身边是没有接触到啦

In every video about China and Japan, you will see Koreans in the comment section spreading hate and claiming cultures from these 2 countries. Ironically, Korea was ruled by both so it's obvious who's the liar.

@random_guy1084

6 ай бұрын

J is in decline because of 嫌韓. It’s because 天 (heaven) abhors those who curse their parents.

@user-wn5um9ck3y

5 ай бұрын

한국은 일본을 좋아한다 근데 중국은 싫어해 😂 왜 착각속에 살아?

@random_guy1084

5 ай бұрын

@@user-wn5um9ck3y 위 글을 쓴 사람이 일본인입니다 (예전에도 대화했던). 저도 일본인 좋아합니다. 단지, 위 혐한글에 대해 답변을 달았을 뿐입니다. 일반 일본인과 극우 혐한 일본인은 구분을 하셔야 합니다.

@user-wn5um9ck3y

5 ай бұрын

@@random_guy1084 쟤 한국 관련된 영상이면 어딜가나 있던데 참 대단하다고 생각합니다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 인도 영상에도 가서 한국에서 인종차별 당했다는 썰 지어내던데 원래 저런 얘인가요?

@random_guy1084

5 ай бұрын

@@user-wn5um9ck3y 네, 맞습니다. 이곳에도 3년전부터 꾸준히 와서 한국 험담하는 혐한론자 입니다. 웃긴점은 한국에 너무 관심이 많다는 것입니다. 즉, 한국에 대한 콤플렉스를 한국에 대한 혐오로 나타내는 것이라 생각합니다.

Respect for clothing and culture is as important as respect for one's own history. It is an indisputable fact that China, as one of the four ancient civilizations, has a profound cultural accumulation. There is no need for us to steal other cultures because we have strong cultural confidence, and I hope you have the same in front of the screen.

@chenleighton1091

2 жыл бұрын

@@temujinjeon1742 No matter which clansman becomes emperor, use Han language! Speak the Han language!

@JENNYLEEWORLD

2 жыл бұрын

Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 3000 years. Look up conquest dynasty. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and invention came from koreanic Mongolic peoples. Chinese characters were invented by koreanic peoples when they created china's first shang dynasty.

@chenleighton1091

2 жыл бұрын

@@JENNYLEEWORLD I don't know where you got that information! But what is the record of Korean history? Are there written records dating back more than 3,000 years? Chinese characters have a trend of development, from oracle to han Dynasty small seal script, evolution to the back of large seal script, regular script and so on! Korea has been enslaved by different countries throughout its history! How do you develop your own civilization?

@JENNYLEEWORLD

2 жыл бұрын

@@chenleighton1091 koreanic peoples have lived in Korea area for over 60,000 years ago. Look up dolmens. You will find dolmens in only certain areas. That area is the homeland of Koreanic peoples. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 3000 years. Look up conquest dynasty. Korea was never conquered and ruled by anyone in history. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and invention came from koreanic Mongolic peoples. China has zero history. 95% of Chinese history is of Korean Manchu mongol peoples. No country has ever conquered and ruled Korea in history. Five Chinese people getting lost and building one tent somewhere near Korea doesn't equal as conquered and ruled. Delusional Chinese. Chinese originated from Austronesians. Chinese came from Burma and southern china and southeast Asia. Chinese first arose in hand river which is connected to Yangtze river..not yellow river. Chinese are originally 100% austronesian. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 3000 years. Look up conquest dynasty

@aero.l

2 жыл бұрын

@@JENNYLEEWORLD Koreans seem to like making up shyt to support their perspectives. There are no archaeological or written records to support your opinion.

十音从来就没说韩服是汉服 只是说韩服在一定程度上受到了汉服的影响而已 部分韩国人 不要再说什么“我们的就是我们的 ”这种话了！！在韩国留学 好人坏人见了很多 记得有语学院老师竟然和我说 汉字就是韩字 ！？？Are you kidding me?当然喜爱中国人的韩国人也很多！谢谢你们尊重中国的传统文化！

@user-wf5me2jf3o

3 жыл бұрын

那就请他们恢复他们的古老文字。我对他们恢复汉语表示十分欢迎且认同。

@user-yn1es1lg6q

3 жыл бұрын

大宇宙韩民国，是白叫的？

@aprilzero4136

3 жыл бұрын

既然是他们的，为什么他们要去汉字呢？他们不觉得这逻辑根本不自洽吗？

@ruban7292

3 жыл бұрын

slaves of autocratic states

I'm so worried. Hanbok is a symbol of democracy....is it real?? Then, Are you guys really okay?

@Littlewatermelon_Melons

3 жыл бұрын

They still have to pay their America dad and lick their boots

@gwy7086

3 жыл бұрын

@@Littlewatermelon_Melons America is going to nuke your home lol

@user-cw9en7gb8v

3 жыл бұрын

Taiwan no.1

@joshuadu7927

3 жыл бұрын

Korea used to be a vassal country of China and Japan but now it’s part of the USA

@HH-rn9ph

3 жыл бұрын

@@Littlewatermelon_Melons ?? It’s doesn’t make sense My question is Does Hanbok represent democracy? My Chinese friend was afraid of talking about Hanbok..

I saw a comment on a Hanfu video claiming that they're copying the Hanbok. I thought of writing a history lesson, but decided to just dislike the comment instead. As a Scandinavian, the three countries all have similar cultures, languages and traditions, but no one would claim that one of us is the original. There were Vikings in Norway, Denmark and Sweden. They were all distinct and separate from each other. When you think of a Viking you think of raids and wariors and not traders and explorers, which majority were. Norwegians and Danes were the raiding types, but only during dire need. Swedish vikings explored and traded and established what is now Russia. That is a historic fact. Russians on the other hand denies vikings ever being in Russia. China has been a thriving culture thousands of years before the Kingdom of Korea was established. Sure, there lived people on the peninsula, but they had no influense over a well estabished culture such as China was at that time. Being influensed by your neighbours is perfectly fine. After all, it's them you have the closest bond with. Cultural exchange is vitally important still today. We give and take from each other and expand our cultures to become better. Chinese and Korean cultures, clothes and languages blended over thousands of years. But that doesn't mean that one is owned by the other or that one is a copy of the other. It's same same, but different. Just like Scandinavian nations are very similar in most ways, we're still distinctly different, have our own history and culture apart from the others. It just saddens me that people, in this day of unlimted access to information, still make baseless claims because of their feelings and beliefs. Just because you believe it to be true, doesn't make it fact. But that is, unfortunately, the human condition.

@JENNYLEEWORLD

8 ай бұрын

The name china was awarded and given to china by it's western Masters who saved weak scared china from dangerous koreanic and Japanese during WW2. Over 40 million Chinese wiped out during WW2. Over 500 million Chinese wiped out in total by koreanic and Mongolic peoples. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Delusional Angry confused jealous Chinese. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and Chinese invention originated from koreanic and Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese population were austronesian negritos. Yangtze river southern china Burma southeast Asia is Homeland of Chinese austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited only by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Han people and han dynasty was named after han river which is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to fake china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 5000 years.,....

@user-ob5fk1bo6v

2 ай бұрын

Thanks for speaking out! Also sharing the history of your people, I know bit more about Vikings now lol

Hanfu is Chinese. Hanbok is Korean. The end

@666Yourkarma

Жыл бұрын

Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China Hanfu is from Korea wen Korea ruled China before Ming dynasty we influenced in China 1500years ago Koreans are from Mongolian our culture and Dna is very different with China. Just that’s science and truth. China kills and buried and burned ur owned culture Protect ur original culture Koreans and all world liked ur origin Not copy from others Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China Hanfu prove our history letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture Not from China We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others? Hanfu has existed in Ming Dynasty But Text of Hanfu has been created just 20years ago You guys haven’t wore thousands years and even 10years ago. You suddenly started wear hanfu just in 10years You guys insist Hanfu is origin. Korea has been Manchuria before ming dynasty Hanbok has been for a long time in Korea Youguys insist Ours r from Korea We don’t say Kimono is from Korea even though we have wore Kimono for along time No one says kimono is Korean cloth China is greedy China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others? China will be broken Chinese will admit their greedy fault and Tibet and Hongkong and Taiwan will be happy and free China will be heaven when they will be broken completely

@cindylee8529

Жыл бұрын

Such an easy concept but so many people just wake up and decide no 🥲

@jjyoon3616

Жыл бұрын

That's right

@666Yourkarma

Жыл бұрын

@@jjyoon3616 Thx you for admitting Korean’s history was in Manchuria And China made Fake information No worries We forgive you. Peace of world!

@kevint-bq3sg

2 ай бұрын

많은 한국인들은 그런 단순한 진실을 모르고, 어디에서나 다른 나라의 문화를 훔치는 방법만을 알고 있습니다.

You know you win when the other side had to bring up things that are completely unrelated just to attack you.

@ynwa1246

3 жыл бұрын

Politics doesn’t change history. Using it to spread hate just makes you look pathetic and ignorant.

@user-md5yc3qj8f

3 жыл бұрын

说的没错 因为它们说不过了才会攻击其他的 一群💩一样的东西

@user-hi7ix8re1c

3 жыл бұрын

Why China distroied their culture and steal other countries’s culture?

@calistaprevost4075

3 жыл бұрын

@김정환 “You know you win when the other side had to bring up things that are completely unrelated just to attack you “I think you just proved it .😊

@user-md5yc3qj8f

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-hi7ix8re1c Destroied what？You'd better be careful that one day the North Korea destroy you.They have nuclear bombs😄But the only thing that can explode in your country is Samsung Note7😆

翻了下评论，韩国人真的很有意思，你跟他们谈服饰文化，他们和你谈政治，你和他们谈历史，他们跟你谈翻墙，你讲道理他们羞辱你，你回喷他们他们玩复制。真就说不过就转移话题呗，老饭圈战士了😂😂。真是对牛弹琴，白费口舌，只希望理智观众多一点别被国际舆论牵着鼻子走吧。 话说回来，只有国力强盛国际地位提升才能获得尊重，我们这一代人还是多多努力发展，多多搞文化复兴吧，任重而道远。

@bess2rui

3 жыл бұрын

我有时候特别好奇，他们是精神多么贫瘠才会一定要靠幻想来树立自尊。说孔子是韩国人真特别匪夷所思

@턴언더

3 жыл бұрын

푸헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헤헿!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@ruban7292

3 жыл бұрын

slaves of autocratic states~~😂😂😂

@zhaococo9609

3 жыл бұрын

@@ruban7292 better than the doggy of America daddy~~😄

@user-gf5oy5wz9n

3 жыл бұрын

@@ruban7292 Are you so happy to be a dog for Americans?~~😂😂😂

we in Mexico have the same problem, central and south America are claiming our culinary art as theirs to the point that even well, I cannot say names but some of them are now requesting to be recognized in UNESCO for their culinary art when all they did was copying ours. so do not fall into the same mistake as we did, fight for your culture, fight for your rights!!!! now they have a campaign that claims that if the UNESCO do not accept their claims they will label them as racists...ensuring their success..

@JENNYLEEWORLD

Жыл бұрын

The name china was awarded and given to china by it's western Masters who saved weak scared china from dangerous koreanic and Japanese during WW2. Over 40 million Chinese wiped out during WW2. Over 500 million Chinese wiped out in total by koreanic and Mongolic peoples. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Delusional Angry confused jealous Chinese. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and Chinese invention originated from koreanic and Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese population were austronesian negritos. Yangtze river southern china Burma southeast Asia is Homeland of Chinese austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited only by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Han people and han dynasty was named after han river which is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to fake china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 5000 years.,.

@JENNYLEEWORLD

Жыл бұрын

The name china was awarded and given to china by it's western Masters who saved weak scared china from dangerous koreanic and Japanese during WW2. Over 40 million Chinese wiped out during WW2. Over 500 million Chinese wiped out in total by koreanic and Mongolic peoples. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Delusional Angry confused jealous Chinese. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and Chinese invention originated from koreanic and Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese population were austronesian negritos. Yangtze river southern china Burma southeast Asia is Homeland of Chinese austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited only by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Han people and han dynasty was named after han river which is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to fake china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 5000 years.,.

@vintageb8

4 ай бұрын

lol why not just name them ?

@danielzhang1916

Ай бұрын

they know they have nothing so they try to steal, China has thousands of years of history, they are only tricking themselves with revisionist history, no one but Koreans believe a word of what they're saying, even Japan, Vietnam, etc. admit that a lot of things came from ancient China

South Koreans say that the influence of Hanbok on Hanfu is mainly due to the records of the Yuan Dynasty in the Zizhi Tongan Xu （资治通鉴续）. During the Yuan Dynasty, China set up an eastern province in Korea, and the king of Korea served as the Prime Minister of the eastern province. The king of Korea was only the second leader of a province in China. Since then, the six generations of kings of Korea did not get the temple name, but received posthumous titles from the Yuan Dynasty, The posthumous titles are all marked with the word "Zhong" .The period from 1270 to 1356 was called the "Yuan intervention period".The murals of the tomb of bureaucrat Park Yi in Miyang, South Korea, show the Mongolian style of the late Koryo PeriodUnder the control and influence of the Yuan Dynasty, braided hair and beard clothes were popular in the Koryo, and the loyal king once ordered to shave hair and change Mongolia clothes. Koryo has been Mongolian, and Koryo is braided hair and improved Mongolian clothes. A large number of eunuchs and palace maids in the Yuan Dynasty came from Korea. According to the time records, these Mongolia style palace maids affected the clothes of some Mongolian nobles. In addition, it is obvious that male Mongolian nobles cannot be Affected from the clothes of Korean eunuchs. The clothes of the Yuan Dynasty are not considered to be one kind of Hanfu, but Mongolian clothes. After the establishment of the Ming Dynasty, Zhu Yuanzhang clearly instructed to restore the clothes of the Han traditional costume, and the clothes of the Yuan Dynasty were thrown into the pile of old paper, so how can we talk about the influence of hanbok on the Hanfu of the Ming Dynasty? After the establishment of the Ming Dynasty, Koryo quickly changed from a province of the Yuan Dynasty to a subsidiary of the Ming Dynasty. The clothes of the Jorge king's officials were rewarded by China. Finally, Koryo could wear Mongolian clothes no more and without braiding. It was obvious who influenced who.

@666Yourkarma

Жыл бұрын

Koreans are from Mongolian our culture and Dna is very different with China. Just that’s science and truth. China kills and buried and burned ur owned culture Protect ur original culture Koreans and all world liked ur origin Not copy from others Hanfu is from Korea And Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China Hanfu is from Korea When Korea conquered China before Ming dynasty . Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China Hanfu prove our history letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture Not from China We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others? Hanfu has existed in Ming Dynasty But Text of Hanfu has been created just 20years ago You guys haven’t wore thousands years and even 10years ago. You suddenly started wear hanfu just in 10years You guys insist Hanfu is origin. Korea has been Manchuria before ming dynasty Hanbok has been for a long time in Korea Youguys insist Ours r from Korea We don’t say Kimono is from Korea even though we have wore Kimono for along time No one says kimono is Korean cloth China is greedy China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?

@user-ru2kz7ix4o

Жыл бұрын

@@666Yourkarma 日本的部分文化也起源于中国，你这句话就像英文是美国发明的一样

@666Yourkarma

Жыл бұрын

@@user-ru2kz7ix4o 응 Evil

@666Yourkarma

Жыл бұрын

@@user-ru2kz7ix4o Koreans hope China can make freedom for Taiwan, Mongolians, Tibetan, Hongkong, Joseon tribes for respect their owned history and culture

@user-th1hz2ky3f

Жыл бұрын

@@666Yourkarma 韩国人是什么重要的东西吗，为什么要在意韩国人的看法，一个小殖民地，以前是中国的藩属国，后来是日本的藩属国，现在是美国的藩属国，从来没有过国家尊严，你记得中国人民志愿军打进你们的首尔吗，这足以证明你们的民族是多么的渺小

HANFU is not HANBOK: Please Respect the History!

@eastsea5021

3 жыл бұрын

@YUYING ZHAO your country government must stop the 東北工程 first

@user-xn3cb7tm9t

3 жыл бұрын

@@lucileliu2099 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

@user-rq7wl5tr1l

3 жыл бұрын

@@lucileliu2099 I'm sorry, but that's not the case. HANBOK IS KOREA'S OWN TRADITIONAL COSTUME. We wore hanbok even when we were in Goguryeo. Isn't the culture of your country influenced by South Korea if you fix it by being influenced by the culture of neighboring countries? Not only you but South Korea has a very old history. In the history of the democratization movement, Hanbok was with us. Hanbok has been with us for a long time. Don't distort history.

@user-md3by9ey5d

3 жыл бұрын

@@lucileliu2099 그래 이게 잘못된말이야

@user-xc5oo6sz9o

3 жыл бұрын

@못생김이자글자글 Hanfu is not Hanbok Based on the quotes from Korean Kings and authoritative historical documents. Korea Hanbok is the one that was influenced by China Hanfu, not the other way around. Claiming Hanfu's characteristics and styles belong to Hanbok only shows your ignorance. Hanbok shares similarities with Hanfu because ancient Korea adopted Chinese costumes and headgears. You can use them, but you don't have the right to distort history or claim these Hanfu features as Korean origin. Hanfu is for everyone, but Hanfu is Chinese 1.Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀) : AD 648 “春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製” “춘추가 또한 장복(章服)을 고쳐서 중국의 제도에 따를 것을 청하자” " Gim Chunchu 무열왕 asked the Emperor of Tang for permission to change the traditional cloth of Silla, the country shall follow the Chinese style " 2. History of Goryeo 고려사권 137권 (高麗史 137卷): AD 1392 “復行洪武年號，襲大明衣冠,禁胡服” “부행홍무년호 습대명의복 금호복” “Joseon Dynasty shall adopt the era name of Hongwu of Ming, wear Ming costumes and headgears, ban Hu Dress” 3.Samguk Sagi Volumn 5『삼국사기』권5 『三國史記』卷5 : AD 649 “(真德王) 三年,春正月，始服中朝衣冠” “(진덕왕) 3년(649) 봄 정월에 비로소 중국의 의관(衣冠)을 착용하였다” " In the third year of Jindeok, the first month of spring, people in Silla (South Korea) started to wear Chinese-style cloth and hats" 4.Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty Volume 36 고종실록 고종 36권 朝鮮王朝實錄 高宗 36卷 “我邦疆土, 係是漢、唐古地, 衣冠文物, 悉遵宋、明遺制, 接其統, 而襲其號, 無所不可" “우리나라의 강토는 한(漢) 나라와 당(唐) 나라의 옛 땅에 붙어있고 의관(衣冠)과 문물(文物)은 다 송(宋) 나라나 명(明) 나라의 옛 제도를 따르고 있으니, 그 계통을 잇고 그 칭호를 그대로 쓴들 안 될 것이 없습니다” “The territories of Korea used to be ancient land of Han and Tang. Our costumes and relics conformed to Song. The kingdom system and structure adopted from Ming. It is rightful and legal to inherit the true name of Greater China and her culture - Joseon Gojong조선고종 高宗” 5. Taejo of Goryeos' Ten Rules 왕이 훈요10조를 내리다 高麗太祖 訓要十條 "惟我東方, 舊慕唐風, 文物禮樂, 悉遵其制, 殊方異土, 人性各異, 不必苟同. 契丹是禽獸之國, 風俗不同, 言語亦異, 衣冠制度, 愼勿效焉" “우리 동방(東方)은 옛날부터 중국의 풍속[唐風]을 흠모하여 문물(文物)과 예악(禮樂)이 다 그 제도를 따랐으나, 지역이 다르고 인성(人性)도 각기 다르므로 꼭 같게 할 필요는 없다. 거란(契丹)은 짐승과 같은 나라로 풍속이 같지 않고 말도 다르니 의관제도(衣冠制度)를 삼가 본받지 말라” "We, the East admire the customs of the Tang Dynasty, learn her rite and music, adopt her system and style. People from far land are different from us in terms of humanity, do not try to make them look similar in a subservient manner. The nature of Khitan (契丹) is brutal and bestial, we do not share the same value or language with them, so do not follow their system of attire"

没见过说爷爷像孙子的

@lalisaaaa0327

3 жыл бұрын

描述的真确切

@albertwong5031

3 жыл бұрын

韩国历史是用汉字记载的，景福宫和光化门上是汉字，韩国宪法的原件是用汉字写的，明明就是中国的文化属国。😅说爸爸遗传了自己的基因，真不像话。 한국 역사는 한자로 기재되어 있다. 경복궁과 광화문에는 모두 한자가 쓰여 있다. 한국 헌법 원본까지도 한자로 쓰여 있다. 고대 한국은 중국의 문화 속국이었다。😅아버지가 자기 유전자를 물려받았다고 하더군요，정말 말도 안 돼요

@user-ez4zr2br1u

3 жыл бұрын

搞笑 那爷爷 有多少个孙子 中国56个民族 都称为汉族文化的话 越南，日本，俄罗斯，印度，欧洲 全当孙子吗 无理取闹! 想支持 资本主义， 来啊 怎么羡慕的不得了吧 哈哈哈😄 对了 不是你们 禁止 KZread 了吗? 能在这儿 说话吗?

@user-tc3zg3pi7c

3 жыл бұрын

@@albertwong5031 你的知识是在哪里学的。한국은 중국의 속국이 아닙니다. 한글이 만들어지기 전에는 한자를 사용하기는 하였지만 엄연히 중국과 표기법이 달랐습니다. 제대로 된 상식을 가지고 이야기를 해주었으면 좋겠습니다. 그리고 오랜 세월 동안 한복과 김치는 한국의 전통 문화로 인정 받아 왔습니다. 단 한번도 전 세계인들에게 중국의 것이라고 인정 받은적이 없죠. 실제로도 중국의 것이 아니고요. 왜 갑자기 한복과 김치를 중국의 것이라고 우기는지 이해가 되지 않습니다. 당신들의 후세대들이 잘못된 역사 의식을 가지지 않도록 지금부터라도 제대로 된 역사를 알려주길 바랍니다.

@unjingha5273

3 жыл бұрын

₩uhan V!rus is only yours. 👌

People seem to forget that just because the hanbok was influenced by the Chinese doesn’t mean it’s not still Korean.

@mcc9102

2 жыл бұрын

Korean logic is that Hanbok, which literally 2 Chinese words stands for 汉袍 han Po, Chinese Han's robe）influenced Chinese Han's robe. LoL it is like Korean invented the suit and ties.

@lyhthegreat

2 жыл бұрын

@@mcc9102 kinda reminds me how some vietnamese people claimed how their lunar new year or 'Tet' was adopted and copied by the chinese which resulted in the chinese new year.

@kellyyy7774

2 жыл бұрын

No one in China gives a sh*t to your Hanbok if Korean hadn’t stolen from Chinese Hanfu styles and claim to be their original traditional clothing in the first place🤮🤮🤮

@666Yourkarma

Жыл бұрын

Hanfu is from Korea And Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China Hanfu is from Korea When Korea conquered China before Ming dynasty . Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China Hanfu prove our history letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture Not from China We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?

@leexinlong2287

Жыл бұрын

@@666Yourkarma Go back and see what language your history books are written in.Poor Koreans,thousands of years of vassal history has done this to you?😂

What's scary is that there are many Chinese who support Korea and Koreans on the matter. Mainly because they are fans of K-pop, K-dramas, or they are dating/married to Koreans.

@random_guy1084

6 ай бұрын

Don't be scared. They will be blessed if they support K and K people. This is my sincere and serious advice.

@Sheepybearry

4 ай бұрын

@@random_guy1084 So should Koreans support Chinese people and culture. EVERYONE SHOULD SUPPORT EVERY CULTURE!

@spit_or_swallow

3 ай бұрын

Im Nagalim this Korean are crazy

@spit_or_swallow

3 ай бұрын

can i follow you in Instagram?

@user-my9bq6ot1n

23 күн бұрын

I said I wanted a logical discussion in this video, so I don't have any expectations, but I'll give it a try. In other Chinese videos, they just deleted my comment. First, it is influenced but interactive. Hanbok and Hanfu have different roots. Hanbok is based on the clothing of the northern equestrian people, and Hanfu is based on the clothing of the southern settled people. Accordingly, China's Hanfu was also a form in which men also wore skirts in the ancient era, but in the 3rd century BC, under the influence of Hufu, they began to wear pants. There is a record in the Jaji Tonggam that while King Jo Muryeong was enforcing the ban on wearing trousers, Chinese society vehemently rejected it, calling it barbarian culture. Additionally, due to frequent exchanges with Joseon during the Ming Dynasty, similar cultures often appear. To conclude, the Ming Dynasty clothing that is suggested to be similar to Hanbok, which China claims to be an imitation of Hanbok, is Goryeo style brought over from Goryeo. The Hanfu of the Yuan Ming Dynasty was greatly influenced by the Hanbok from the late Goryeo Dynasty to the early Joseon Dynasty due to the influence of the Goryeo style that was popular during the Yuan Dynasty, and Chinese historical materials such as Sokjachi Tonggam also record that Chinese clothing during that period was influenced by the Goryeo style. In other words, it is not that Hanfu from the Ming Dynasty came over and became Hanbok, but rather, Hanbok came over and changed Hanfu into the way it was during the Ming Dynasty. In addition, Danryeong, which was given and maintained by the Ming imperial family, is a costume that originated in the West and spread through China. Of course, a lot of Chinese culture and clothing were imported to the Korean Peninsula, and Tang Dynasty clothing was adopted as royal clothing by most countries in East Asia. Han Chineseists ignore the history of the introduction of Goryeo style clothes and claim that Goryeo style hanfu is an independent Han clothing, was influenced by the Tang Dynasty, or that Ming Dynasty Hanfu influenced Hanbok. However, according to common sense, if Koryo-style hanfu was the unique cultural attire of the Han people, there was no reason for the Ming royal family to ban it by edict, saying, "This is not a Chinese custom." Also, influence is overinterpreted. Just because a country has been influenced by it, the clothing and culture of that country cannot all become imitations. The fact that ancient Japan's clothing was so strongly influenced by Baekje's clothing that it was worn directly from Baekje is also described in a number of Japanese records, such as Nihon Shoki and Shangfu Ryuki. However, that does not mean that kimono is collectively called hanbok. In other words, culture is not imperialism that takes over each country. Cultures are transmitted, merge, or coexist. In a similar case, Neo-Confucianism was strongly influenced by Buddhism in India and Nepal. However, it is the same as saying that Neo-Confucianism is the Buddhist ideology of India and Nepal. Second, the traditional clothing of the Korean people does not represent the entire hanbok. Based on the Korean-Chinese hanbok, it can be said that the Korean-Chinese hanbok exists in Chinese traditional clothing. However, it is incorrect to interpret the Hanbok of the Korean people as one of Chinese costumes. In the past, China used the ethnic Koreans to carry out the Northeast Project to intentionally deny the history of Goguryeo and Balhae, that is, Korean history, and reduce them to a minority in China. Of course, it is not currently underway, but the problem is that in the private sector, Chinese people still cite studies from the Northeast Project and provide incorrect information to foreign sites and foreigners. In this situation, Hanbok is shown to foreigners and, without any further explanation, they say, “Because there are Korean-Chinese people, it is a traditional Chinese costume.” If so, even in the private sector in Korea, it is inevitable to receive fierce criticism, such as "China's influence and subcategories are often emphasized without any historical context." In order for China to call the Korean-Chinese and Hanbok traditional clothing, it must recognize Hanbok as Korea's unique clothing. Korea is a different country from China, Hanbok is Korea's unique traditional costume inherited from northern nomadic peoples, and the Hanbok worn by Korean-Chinese people is also a traditional costume derived from Korea's Hanbok. This must be explained in advance to avoid 'misunderstandings'. In conclusion, although it is true that China has had a great influence on East Asia, it is only at the level of “influence.” The influence of western regions such as the Hobok of the northern nomadic tribes, Korea's Goryeo Yang, and Central Asia and India on China cannot be ignored. Claiming that another country's culture is one's own based on cross-cultural influence is simply a claim that causes discomfort in the country in question. This is also true in other cultures. In the case of European traditional clothing, after the fall of Western Rome, Gothic clothing was popular, and then through Southern Europe and France, at one time even Turkish and Persian clothing were popular, and now they are wearing suits originating from England, and these past clothing are their own unique style. I do not claim that it is the culture and clothing of . By this logic, Chinese culture was also influenced by Korea, so it would be meaningless to argue that Chinese culture is a part of Korean culture. Incidentally, Hanfu is a traditional Chinese clothing. However, the modern Hanfu popular in China is not traditional Chinese clothing. The reason is simple. In fact, Hanfu was fused with the clothing of the Manchu people, and has been passed down to modern times under the name of cheongsam. The Chinese claim that the cheongsam is the clothing of the Manchu people, and that the original Chinese clothing was hanfu. This is no different from cultural imperialism. Culture does not move towards an imperialistic form as the Chinese claim. They fuse together and develop in a better direction. Hanbok developed into its modern form through exchanges with various cultures, including Hanfu and Kimono. Even if we study Goguryeo clothing now and wear it again, it is bound to be reinterpreted in a new form. This is because we do not even know how people wore clothes during the Goguryeo period. In other words, you are wearing a newly created costume rather than a traditional costume. It is correct to see Hanfu as a reinterpretation of the Hanfu wearing movement that is popular in modern China. I don't even know how to wear Hanfu, so isn't it inevitable that it will have to be reinterpreted? It even looks different from the Hanfu of the past. To be exact, it is closer to Hanbok. If you deny the entire cheongsam, the unique beauty of hanfu mixed in it will also disappear, and then people will try to take a part of it from hanbok that looks similar. Then it has no choice but to resemble hanbok. Considering that China's Hanfu wearing movement also took place after the popularity of K-pop and Korean dramas, we can see that Hanfu = Hanbok was an unreasonable claim due to China's cultural inferiority complex. In other words, the reality of Hanfu is a fake that is completely different from the Hanfu of the past, and is a newly created costume in modern times. Just because the name is borrowed from tradition does not mean it is a traditional costume. In other words, Hanbok can be listed as a UNESCO cultural heritage, but Hanfu cannot. China needs to love its traditional culture. Cheongsam is a unique Chinese traditional culture that was passed down through the fusion of Manchurian clothing and Hanfu during the Qing Dynasty. Now, denying the cheongsam and insisting on Hanfu is in fact denying their own history of the Qing Dynasty and Hanfu, and in conclusion, they cannot help but fall into the same contradiction as denying the entire history of China. Considering these circumstances, it is highly likely that China's cultural misunderstandings and misconceptions will strengthen its negative influence on Korea. In reality, it is only worsening the feelings of each country, and China's external image is worsening. On the contrary, in the process of fighting like this, Hanbok becomes more famous. Lastly, it occurred to me, but I hope that no one appears who says, ‘Both cheongsam and hanfu are Chinese.’ As explained above, Hanfu cannot be revived in modern times. Hanfu already exists under the name of cheongsam, so how can it be revived? It is impossible to resurrect a living person. This kind of behavior is no different from a child throwing a tantrum and claiming that everything is his or hers. Simply put, that is cultural imperialism. In the past, there was a saying like this in Joseon. “The territory is too large to be called a small country, and the mind is too narrow to be called a great country, so it is called China.” It's natural, but it's extremely wrong to say and do, and I really hate this. So don't let me get to the horrible reality that these words were true. I want to like China.

A lot of people in the comments be failing their AP World History exams

@mochiinuo

3 жыл бұрын

haha, so unfortunate :') when ppl take "we shall rewrite history" too literally

@rainaz5677

3 жыл бұрын

i dont even think they have history classes in their educational system lmao

@midorikow3518

3 жыл бұрын

They probably don’t have to take history class lmao

@rainaz5677

3 жыл бұрын

@@snowyy.5275 what i said was sarcasm, they do have history class, but they teach children based on "history" that are not confirmed to be true, most of them are obvious that its either fake or wrong. for example they had a MYTH of a god-like creature and somehow they put it in ACTUAL HISTORY CLASS for kids? google "檀君" or "hroukiliv dankastle". they just think whatever "proves" that they have a long history is true and ignore everything else. it shows how they have no respect to true history and are pathetic. people keep bragging about what they dont have and are insecure of, that why koreans get crazy when people tell them they have no original culture. thats the same reason why they dont have sportsmanship

@weptoon3471

3 жыл бұрын

Hanbok's meaning han>>korea=한국. "한" is pronounced han bok>>it means clothing in korea hanbok and hanfu is different so plz don't fight

好几个月了，韩国人还在复制粘贴，精神可嘉！

@123eva9

3 жыл бұрын

Hhhhh

@user-tp8vu5qy9d

3 жыл бұрын

kroea Comfort women also

@user-eg5ld1il9d

3 жыл бұрын

hhhhh

@user-sd9lz8dw9b

3 жыл бұрын

spot on

@virus-a5520

3 жыл бұрын

To insult other countries with human suffering only makes you inhuman. Don't forget that your country was also a victim of war, and that fascist atrocities were also perpetrated in your country

maybe you also can explain the difference between both hanfu vs hanbok so we can see their special characteristics.

@vliu

2 жыл бұрын

It’s really difficult you know 😅 there are so many different styles of clothing throughout several thousand years. All very distinctive. Plus there are so many minority groups in China and their clothing are also very different then Hanfu.

@musicfunanormal3873

Жыл бұрын

Her follow-up videos are compared.

@666Yourkarma

Жыл бұрын

Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China Hanfu is from Korea wen Korea ruled China before Ming dynasty we influenced in China 1500years ago Koreans are from Mongolian our culture and Dna is very different with China. Just that’s science and truth. China kills and buried and burned ur owned culture Protect ur original culture Koreans and all world liked ur origin Not copy from others Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China Hanfu prove our history letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture Not from China We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others? Hanfu has existed in Ming Dynasty But Text of Hanfu has been created just 20years ago You guys haven’t wore thousands years and even 10years ago. You suddenly started wear hanfu just in 10years You guys insist Hanfu is origin. Korea has been Manchuria before ming dynasty Hanbok has been for a long time in Korea Youguys insist Ours r from Korea We don’t say Kimono is from Korea even though we have wore Kimono for along time No one says kimono is Korean cloth China is greedy China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others? China will be broken Chinese will admit their greedy fault and Tibet and Hongkong and Taiwan will be happy and free China will be heaven when they will be broken completely

@musicfunanormal3873

Жыл бұрын

@@666Yourkarma A large number of documents prove that Korean culture is greatly influenced by Chinese culture.Your only evidence is your mouth.

@musicfunanormal3873

Жыл бұрын

@@666Yourkarma A large number of documents prove that Korean culture is greatly influenced by Chinese culture.Your only evidence is your mouth.

Yes, we must not ignore history. But what's more important is no one should claim that something is theirs if it is not. Kimchi, handbok, ssam and more may have similar or related history but are not the same. Time passed and evolved. Move on, please. I wonder how many among those who keep arguing about these history do things so great for their country. Culture can be similar and can come from one another but are not the same. No one from Korea claimed malatang to be Korean food even when it's really popular that a lot of malatang restaurants opened up.

@bellla9474

Жыл бұрын

I saw a lot of Koreans on Twitter claiming that Malatang is korean traditional food, ignoring that even Malatang restaurants in SK were opened by chinese. Funny.

@hello-yr6fm

Жыл бұрын

确实有很多人称 麻辣烫是韩国的，

@Hoo88846

Жыл бұрын

Hanfu has influenced the traditional clothing of many neighbouring cultures, including the Korean hanbok,[7][8] the Japanese kimono (wafuku),[9][10] the Okinawan ryusou,[11][12] and the Vietnamese áo giao lĩnh (Việt Phục).[13][14] Up to a certain extent, hanfu has also influenced some elements in Western fashion, especially those influenced by Chinoiserie fashion, due to the popularity of Chinoiserie since the 17th century in Europe and in the United States.[15]: 52 [note 1] Silk remains a core element of Hanfu and Chinese traditional clothing.

@Qiushishuo

Жыл бұрын

lol, Korean start to claim Soy milk is their traditional food now.

@tomli9793

Жыл бұрын

They first claimed that the Chinese stole Korean culture

fact : North Korean announcer still wears Hanbok.

@user-rt1hu5wj4v

3 жыл бұрын

yes

@kcco8367

3 жыл бұрын

@@southiefcountykorea692 니가 북한사람이라는 증거 보여봐ㅋㅋ

@user-rx4ng7gi1y

3 жыл бұрын

@@southiefcountykorea692 북한이 유툽이 되냐? ㅋㅋ

@icrushchildrensdreams4556

3 жыл бұрын

@@southiefcountykorea692 cry about it. 개속 울어라

@kcco8367

3 жыл бұрын

@@southiefcountykorea692 Hello~ North Korean Why aren't you answering?ㅜㅜ Come on, answer me in Korean ㅋㅋㅋ

2.7万个踩，偷国到底是花了多少钱，雇了多少人来刷啊？

@wendywang396

3 жыл бұрын

@@ivyfu9296 国人好多用不了KZread

@jackxia2473

3 жыл бұрын

@@wendywang396 大陆翻墙的人少说也得有一亿

@lyeeshewn6838

3 жыл бұрын

有组织的，而且官方默认。看数字就知道了。

@steamfish323

3 жыл бұрын

@@ivyfu9296 為什麼要心痛？我覺得dislike 愈多愈代表韓國人的惱羞成怒，我們不需要花時間花心思在這小事上比拼

@user-rb9jr9ix6o

3 жыл бұрын

後亦多畜高麗美人, 大臣有權者, 輒以此遺之, 京師達官貴人, 必得高麗女, 然後爲名家. 自至正以來, 宮中給事使令, 大半高麗女, 以故四方衣服、靴帽、器物, 皆仿高麗, 擧世若狂. - 續資治通鑒) 卷214, 원기(元紀) 32

Everyone know that chinese cultures spread globaly...i'm from indonesia no doubt might be immigrant from ancient china bring hanfu influent to korean clothing...korean netizen must googling their history because they are not that long comparing china history....

@random_guy1084

2 жыл бұрын

There are so many this kind of rhetoric here such as "I'm Vietnamese and we admit great C influence, I'm Japanese and we admit great C influence... Try to search Goguryeo murals and see Hanbok there. Just as Xianbei, Mongols, Manchus had their own cultures and clothing styles even though they were geographically closer to China, and they culturally influenced China a lot, Koreans also had their own cultures and clothing styles since very ancient times (far before AD). Chinese mainly started to influence the neighboring regions far later since Tang/Song periods.

@shyun5408

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah...like your "confession" of admitting that Chinese culture had influence on your Indonesian culture matters...History says that China and Korea is completely different country and Hanbok/Kimchi belongs to Korea. You're basically arguing against the fact with your "tiny belief" which is not even convincing. BTW, I bet you're Chinese (in your root at least), and go get some English lesson 'cause your grammar stinks. And next time, argue with facts.

@GodBimmer

2 жыл бұрын

korea just making gimmick for effort co'z famous kpop globally

@cccc5518

2 жыл бұрын

@@random_guy1084 Records of the Joseon Dynasty Volume 36 고종실록 고종 36권 朝鮮王朝實錄 高宗 36卷： AD 1897 “我邦疆土, 係是漢、唐古地, 衣冠文物, 悉遵宋、明遺制, 接其統, 而襲其號, 無所不可" “우리나라의 강토는 한(漢) 나라와 당(唐) 나라의 옛 땅에 붙어있고 의관(衣冠)과 문물(文物)은 다 송(宋) 나라나 명(明) 나라의 옛 제도를 따르고 있으니, 그 계통을 잇고 그 칭호를 그대로 쓴들 안 될 것이 없습니다” 2.2 History of Goryeo 고려사권 137권 (高麗史 137卷): AD 1392 “復行洪武年號，襲大明衣冠,禁胡服” “병오 다시 홍무(洪武) 연호를 시행하였고, 명(明)의 의관을 이어 사용하였으며, 호복(胡服)을 금지하였다.”(朝鲜现代语翻译） 3. Taejo of Goryeos' Ten Rules 왕이 훈요10조를 내리다 高麗太祖 訓要十條: AD 943 "惟我東方, 舊慕唐風, 文物禮樂, 悉遵其制, 殊方異土, 人性各異, 不必苟同. 契丹是禽獸之國, 風俗不同, 言語亦異, 衣冠制度, 愼勿效焉" “우리 동방(東方)은 옛날부터 중국의 풍속[唐風]을 흠모하여 문물(文物)과 예악(禮樂)이 다 그 제도를 따랐으나, 지역이 다르고 인성(人性)도 각기 다르므로 꼭 같게 할 필요는 없다. 거란(契丹)은 짐승과 같은 나라로 풍속이 같지 않고 말도 다르니 의관제도(衣冠制度)를 삼가 본받지 말라” 5.Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀) : AD 648 “春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製” “춘추가 또한 장복(章服)을 고쳐서 중국의 제도에 따를 것을 청하자” 4.Samguk Sagi Volumn 5『삼국사기』권5 『三國史記』卷5 : AD 649 “(真德王) 三年,春正月，始服中朝衣冠” “(진덕왕) 3년(649) 봄 정월에 비로소 중국의 의관(衣冠)을 착용하였다”

@zakkjang6770

2 жыл бұрын

So what you try to say? Hanbok is Chinese or Korean cloth?

ㅇㅇ 고려인 기황후가 원나라에 유행시킨 한복. 명나라 황제 홍치제가 말했다. "고려 스타일 옷 (한복) 그만 입어라" - 이내용은 중국 사서에 나오는 얘기

@lovelintang1263

4 ай бұрын

“流行” 你知道这个词的含义吗

@user-xf6uz8fs1h

Ай бұрын

원나라 복식은 정통 한푸에 속하지 않아 청나라도 마찬가지로 한푸가 아니지, 한푸에 속하는건 한, 당, 송, 명나라뿐이야 역사를 모르면 아는척하지 말라고

@xkstnrjwu

Күн бұрын

No that it's true ​@@lovelintang1263

Yup hanfu and hanbok are totally different. No need to argue just like Kimchi is Korean and Pàocài is Chinese.

@user-uw9zf5ev5o

3 жыл бұрын

🤔

@takeshimaxdokdoorisingsunf8597

3 жыл бұрын

@Loong Hwang you are just jealous lol plz stop making your own country stupid. China is a great country only if there's no people like you. Oh and plz study history =) Jakckie Chan and Jet Li are Koreans. How do you feel? lolz

@takeshimaxdokdoorisingsunf8597

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-uw9zf5ev5o Yup they are both beautiful

@user-uw9zf5ev5o

3 жыл бұрын

@@takeshimaxdokdoorisingsunf8597 🤔 both sides have too many stupid and crazy people. maybe this agrument will nerver be ended

@takeshimaxdokdoorisingsunf8597

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-uw9zf5ev5o agree! Hope people study the 'real' history not the 'twisted' history.

部分韩国人的素质简直了，po主都说了请相互尊重，还跑来攻击别人

@user-or4mb8vk5l

3 жыл бұрын

众所周知，韩国是宇宙中心，万物皆由韩国发明，除了美国，因为美国是韩国爹。

@Kai-wc6xc

3 жыл бұрын

对，他们先跑过来恶语伤人，真的无耻。

@user-yu7hv7nc8q

3 жыл бұрын

I met two Korean people in the Chinese restaurant in Japan. The restaurant was very small. They began to smoke and put their feet on the chair. They had no quality at all. I was also charged double for Korean food. The most important thing is that he served only one dish, and it was not finished.

@user-ki9rn7jc7u

3 жыл бұрын

喷他们就完事儿了

@concernedhermit7153

3 жыл бұрын

世人皆知他们连自己国家多少明星都不放过喷死多少，能不喷粪别人吗

Korean could never know what the really history is, because their acient history books are written in Chinese.

@666Yourkarma

Жыл бұрын

Koreans hope China can make freedom for Taiwan, Mongolians, Tibetan, Hongkong, Joseon tribes for respect their owned history and culture peace of world

@666Yourkarma

Жыл бұрын

You speak English so Do you think you are UK,

@nokoxia6413

Жыл бұрын

​@@666Yourkarma As a vassal state of China and Japan in history, Korean should make themselves free from USA nowadays. As for the hope about Taiwan, Tibetan..., you could fignt and win a total war against China then your dream will come true. You delusional clown. XD

@nokoxia6413

Жыл бұрын

@@666Yourkarma I speak English because Eng is international language. But Korean use Chinese in histroy because Korean is one of China's vassal state and Korean have no their own language before 15 century.

@666Yourkarma

Жыл бұрын

@@nokoxia6413 Korea spoke Chinese because Chinese was international language. But Chinese use English in History because China is one of the vassal states united 56 tribes. And Korean have owned language what was Mandarin. we created Korean 700years ago biologically because Mandarin was hieroglyphics uncomfortably because many primitive people created and mixed too many ways by too many ancient people

People who think Hanfu is learning Hanbok must finish watching this video. If you still think so, it can only show that you have no culture and don't understand what history is. It's not a shame to learn from it. Moreover, the truth of history is here. You can't change it. It can only damage the image of your country. This is not a good thing This is also very funny.another basic thing is that China is a country with a long history of 5000 years, not Korea.

@user-cg8nc8bl3w

2 жыл бұрын

support

@hlp7773

2 жыл бұрын

支持

@user-yf4bh2cy4w

2 жыл бұрын

I'm pretty sure that you didn't have any research before you write this comment. Korea also has a history of more than 5000 years. Stop spreading fake news that you don't even know about. I think this topic is going ridiculous because it is true Korea and China had a really close relationship. But I think China is acting like everything that becomes globally popular in Korea is theirs(like things that make profits because of the increased spotlight on Korea). As a Korean, I grew up wearing Hanbok every time for a specific day and Hanbok was an actual culture that never stopped. Also, I saw numerous embezzlement that China followed to make after the Korean original product such as beauty, drama, idols, movies, etc. And this is one of the biggest parts that a lot of countries including Korea think China makes mass imitation products. (Sorry if my English is bad)

@lvo113

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-yf4bh2cy4w You say I don't know history. I think it’s very funny.Koreans always boast that their country has 5000 years of history, but they don't really understand their country's culture. To be honest, You may not know that most Chinese people know that some Koreans like you tell themselves that South Korea has a history of 5000 years all day, which is a joke for Chinese people and foreigners who really understand Chinese culture. You say that you grew up in Hanbok,Chinese people are the same. They grew up in their own traditional clothes .You can also say these words to show that you still didn't watch the above video Hanbok was born under the influence of Hanfu clothing in the Ming Dynasty. You can't change history no matter how you say it. If you want to change history, you'd better dream😀 and don't show your inferiority complex, okay? Chinese people have known their country's cultural heritage since childhood. You don't know your country. You come here to talk about these. Some don't even bring in today's popular culture to change the topic. I think you can read more history books when you have time In the end, I would like to emphasize once again that you should not show your own country's inferiority complex in this. In our view, this is quite embarrassing. And I want to give you a Chinese sentence ＂想改变历史？你还是做梦去吧 别自欺欺人了＂

@user-bi3cx9ds8u

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-yf4bh2cy4w 搞笑，朝鲜一直是中国的附属国，需要中国的保护，文化也是学习中国的，不然都是原始人

존낰ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 웃음벨임?ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그냥 웃으면 됨?ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

@yuanjiang8696

3 жыл бұрын

영어를 알아들어?

@tiara481

3 жыл бұрын

The national flag of South Korea was invented by China

@user-oi5te4ck9g

3 жыл бұрын

댓글을 남긴 중국인들아 위구르인들이 어떻게 탄압받았는지 알고 싶다고 한국말로 댓글을 남겨주었구나 !!🥰

@ningforever1934

3 жыл бұрын

중국 한푸 문화를 좋아해 주셔서 감사합니다

@diyswitwitey

3 жыл бұрын

ㄹㅇ 깔갈깔ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 중국인들 ㅈㄴ 진지한거 유우머 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

这群韩国人是不是都高中没毕业啊。英文看不懂吗？

@qkrdlsgh

3 жыл бұрын

저를 포함한 대부분의 한국인들은 한푸를 한복이라고 생각하지 않습니다. 한푸를 한복이라고 착각하는 것은 소수의 한국인입니다.

@user-yf3mg8fs9m

3 жыл бұрын

泡菜和韩服是中国的，多么愚蠢啊。 你脑子受伤了吗？还是还在进化？

@albertwong5031

3 жыл бұрын

韩国历史用汉字记载，景福宫和光化门上是汉字，韩国宪法原件用汉字写的，就是中国的文化属国。🥺🥺居然说爸爸遗传了自己的基因，真不像话。 한국 역사는 한자로 기재되어 있다. 경복궁과 광화문에는 모두 한자가 쓰여 있다. 한국 헌법 원본까지도 한자로 쓰여 있다. 고대 한국은 중국의 문화 속국이었다。🥺🥺아버지가 자기 유전자를 물려받았다고 하더군요，정말 말도 안 돼요

@albertwong5031

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-yf3mg8fs9m 韩国历史用汉字记载，景福宫和光化门上是汉字，韩国宪法原件用汉字写的，就是中国的文化属国。🥺🥺居然说爸爸遗传了自己的基因，真不像话。 한국 역사는 한자로 기재되어 있다. 경복궁과 광화문에는 모두 한자가 쓰여 있다. 한국 헌법 원본까지도 한자로 쓰여 있다. 고대 한국은 중국의 문화 속국이었다。🥺아버지가 자기 유전자를 물려받았다고 하더군요，정말 말도 안 돼요

@qkrdlsgh

3 жыл бұрын

@@albertwong5031 고대 한국이 중국의 속국이었다는 것은 맞는 말이지만 한국도 한국만의 고유한 문화가 있었다.

I said I wanted a logical discussion in this video, so I don't have any expectations, but I'll give it a try. In other Chinese videos, they just deleted my comment. First, it is influenced but interactive. Hanbok and Hanfu have different roots. Hanbok is based on the clothing of the northern equestrian people, and Hanfu is based on the clothing of the southern settled people. Accordingly, China's Hanfu was also a form in which men also wore skirts in the ancient era, but in the 3rd century BC, under the influence of Hufu, they began to wear pants. There is a record in the Jaji Tonggam that while King Jo Muryeong was enforcing the ban on wearing trousers, Chinese society vehemently rejected it, calling it barbarian culture. Additionally, due to frequent exchanges with Joseon during the Ming Dynasty, similar cultures often appear. To conclude, the Ming Dynasty clothing that is suggested to be similar to Hanbok, which China claims to be an imitation of Hanbok, is Goryeo style brought over from Goryeo. The Hanfu of the Yuan Ming Dynasty was greatly influenced by the Hanbok from the late Goryeo Dynasty to the early Joseon Dynasty due to the influence of the Goryeo style that was popular during the Yuan Dynasty, and Chinese historical materials such as Sokjachi Tonggam also record that Chinese clothing during that period was influenced by the Goryeo style. In other words, it is not that Hanfu from the Ming Dynasty came over and became Hanbok, but rather, Hanbok came over and changed Hanfu into the way it was during the Ming Dynasty. In addition, Danryeong, which was given and maintained by the Ming imperial family, is a costume that originated in the West and spread through China. Of course, a lot of Chinese culture and clothing were imported to the Korean Peninsula, and Tang Dynasty clothing was adopted as royal clothing by most countries in East Asia. Han Chineseists ignore the history of the introduction of Goryeo style clothes and claim that Goryeo style hanfu is an independent Han clothing, was influenced by the Tang Dynasty, or that Ming Dynasty Hanfu influenced Hanbok. However, according to common sense, if Koryo-style hanfu was the unique cultural attire of the Han people, there was no reason for the Ming royal family to ban it by edict, saying, "This is not a Chinese custom." Also, influence is overinterpreted. Just because a country has been influenced by it, the clothing and culture of that country cannot all become imitations. The fact that ancient Japan's clothing was so strongly influenced by Baekje's clothing that it was worn directly from Baekje is also described in a number of Japanese records, such as Nihon Shoki and Shangfu Ryuki. However, that does not mean that kimono is collectively called hanbok. In other words, culture is not imperialism that takes over each country. Cultures are transmitted, merge, or coexist. In a similar case, Neo-Confucianism was strongly influenced by Buddhism in India and Nepal. However, it is the same as saying that Neo-Confucianism is the Buddhist ideology of India and Nepal. Second, the traditional clothing of the Korean people does not represent the entire hanbok. Based on the Korean-Chinese hanbok, it can be said that the Korean-Chinese hanbok exists in Chinese traditional clothing. However, it is incorrect to interpret the Hanbok of the Korean people as one of Chinese costumes. In the past, China used the ethnic Koreans to carry out the Northeast Project to intentionally deny the history of Goguryeo and Balhae, that is, Korean history, and reduce them to a minority in China. Of course, it is not currently underway, but the problem is that in the private sector, Chinese people still cite studies from the Northeast Project and provide incorrect information to foreign sites and foreigners. In this situation, Hanbok is shown to foreigners and, without any further explanation, they say, “Because there are Korean-Chinese people, it is a traditional Chinese costume.” If so, even in the private sector in Korea, it is inevitable to receive fierce criticism, such as "China's influence and subcategories are often emphasized without any historical context." In order for China to call the Korean-Chinese and Hanbok traditional clothing, it must recognize Hanbok as Korea's unique clothing. Korea is a different country from China, Hanbok is Korea's unique traditional costume inherited from northern nomadic peoples, and the Hanbok worn by Korean-Chinese people is also a traditional costume derived from Korea's Hanbok. This must be explained in advance to avoid 'misunderstandings'. In conclusion, although it is true that China has had a great influence on East Asia, it is only at the level of “influence.” The influence of western regions such as the Hobok of the northern nomadic tribes, Korea's Goryeo Yang, and Central Asia and India on China cannot be ignored. Claiming that another country's culture is one's own based on cross-cultural influence is simply a claim that causes discomfort in the country in question. This is also true in other cultures. In the case of European traditional clothing, after the fall of Western Rome, Gothic clothing was popular, and then through Southern Europe and France, at one time even Turkish and Persian clothing were popular, and now they are wearing suits originating from England, and these past clothing are their own unique style. I do not claim that it is the culture and clothing of . By this logic, Chinese culture was also influenced by Korea, so it would be meaningless to argue that Chinese culture is a part of Korean culture. Incidentally, Hanfu is a traditional Chinese clothing. However, the modern Hanfu popular in China is not traditional Chinese clothing. The reason is simple. In fact, Hanfu was fused with the clothing of the Manchu people, and has been passed down to modern times under the name of cheongsam. The Chinese claim that the cheongsam is the clothing of the Manchu people, and that the original Chinese clothing was hanfu. This is no different from cultural imperialism. Culture does not move towards an imperialistic form as the Chinese claim. They fuse together and develop in a better direction. Hanbok developed into its modern form through exchanges with various cultures, including Hanfu and Kimono. Even if we study Goguryeo clothing now and wear it again, it is bound to be reinterpreted in a new form. This is because we do not even know how people wore clothes during the Goguryeo period. In other words, you are wearing a newly created costume rather than a traditional costume. It is correct to see Hanfu as a reinterpretation of the Hanfu wearing movement that is popular in modern China. I don't even know how to wear Hanfu, so isn't it inevitable that it will have to be reinterpreted? It even looks different from the Hanfu of the past. To be exact, it is closer to Hanbok. If you deny the entire cheongsam, the unique beauty of hanfu mixed in it will also disappear, and then people will try to take a part of it from hanbok that looks similar. Then it has no choice but to resemble hanbok. Considering that China's Hanfu wearing movement also took place after the popularity of K-pop and Korean dramas, we can see that Hanfu = Hanbok was an unreasonable claim due to China's cultural inferiority complex. In other words, the reality of Hanfu is a fake that is completely different from the Hanfu of the past, and is a newly created costume in modern times. Just because the name is borrowed from tradition does not mean it is a traditional costume. In other words, Hanbok can be listed as a UNESCO cultural heritage, but Hanfu cannot. China needs to love its traditional culture. Cheongsam is a unique Chinese traditional culture that was passed down through the fusion of Manchurian clothing and Hanfu during the Qing Dynasty. Now, denying the cheongsam and insisting on Hanfu is in fact denying their own history of the Qing Dynasty and Hanfu, and in conclusion, they cannot help but fall into the same contradiction as denying the entire history of China. Considering these circumstances, it is highly likely that China's cultural misunderstandings and misconceptions will strengthen its negative influence on Korea. In reality, it is only worsening the feelings of each country, and China's external image is worsening. On the contrary, in the process of fighting like this, Hanbok becomes more famous. Lastly, it occurred to me, but I hope that no one appears who says, ‘Both cheongsam and hanfu are Chinese.’ As explained above, Hanfu cannot be revived in modern times. Hanfu already exists under the name of cheongsam, so how can it be revived? It is impossible to resurrect a living person. This kind of behavior is no different from a child throwing a tantrum and claiming that everything is his or hers. Simply put, that is cultural imperialism. In the past, there was a saying like this in Joseon. “The territory is too large to be called a small country, and the mind is too narrow to be called a great country, so it is called China.” It's natural, but it's extremely wrong to say and do, and I really hate this. So don't let me get to the horrible reality that these words were true. I want to like China.

Why there are so many duplicated comments?

以前没有什么感觉，现在真的感受到了为什么韩国叫“宇宙起源国”......整个宇宙都是韩国的，我那你点中国的东西怎么了^-^

@user-ix5pw4hd6b

3 жыл бұрын

我宇宙国仅疆域地图就是以银河系黑洞为中心的广域总星图。不知其中哪里有强词夺理，巧取豪夺之说？（保命）

@sherman7832

3 жыл бұрын

Seong O Shim lmao, don’t say shits like this, u r making it sounds so funny.

@user-eq8wo7or5e

3 жыл бұрын

@Seong O Shim In fact, we have been already modest. I don't think we are the center of the world,even though many countries are concerned. It's you who keep claiming that the Mid-Autumn Festival, hanfu,Qu Yuan and so on are your Korean.That's ridiculous.Since your history is shorter than ours, why not trace it to its source with a heart of learning?We never care what other countries get from us. Our only request is to respect history. Why close yourself off in your own world instead of listening to the history and world of others?But the Internet is grumpy. I don't ask you to understand my thoughts. Just stop trying to quibble with me. I don't have time for pointless conversations with you here. If you want to know the history, look it up. Keep pleasing yourself if you don't want to face it. It's simple.话说我都没发现我的赞这么多了。明明只是想来支持一下十音而已。超级不喜欢回复星人有点懵逼。明明只想安安静静地看视频发评论结果就被对线了。0.0

@yvonne6934

3 жыл бұрын

@Seong O Shim No Chinese said that! We did say we are arising but we are creating happiness by our own hands and have no intention to rob from others. Stop believing these lies which demonize Chinese for their own profits.

@yvonne6934

3 жыл бұрын

@Seong O Shim no idea what you are talking about.

腦子是個好東西，希望韓國朋友也能經常使用它，再不行多動動發財的小手查查資料，不要什麼都是你們的好嗎？朝鮮以前就是中國的藩屬國，文化文字服飾都是借中國的，就算改良了那也是起源於中國。好勝沒錯但是硬要說自己是宇宙起源就很無恥了。

@user-wb2kq2pf9i

3 жыл бұрын

他们的脑子就是畸形的。

@hailunss3004

3 жыл бұрын

其实正常的交流都没关系，就是看到有些nt认为汉服是抄了韩服，我直接震惊了……他们以为中国五千年的历史是闹着玩的吗，一点历史观也没有吗……

@user-xyynf

3 жыл бұрын

@@hailunss3004 他们以为四大文明古国包括韩国 噗噗噗

@user-go9ht9sl1u

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-td2jl9gv5v 你的中文翻譯太爛了，恕我無法理解，寫清楚再來好嗎:)

@user-go9ht9sl1u

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-td2jl9gv5v 現在你們穿的韓服是中國明朝的衣服用的漢字是中國千年傳下來的文化，儒學是中國春秋時期開始的思想，你們的古蹟景福宮名字也是從中國的詩經裡來的，都不是韓國的文化，快放棄它們，改穿你們原本漏出胸部的那種傳統服飾，放棄使用漢字，放棄書法跟儒學，希望你們還有文化可以流傳下來:)

We ethnic chinese(Malaysian Chinese here) everywhere are very proud folks and we are also very self-assured people. Unlike those people from tiny country and under thousand of years of being a satellite of the Middle Kingdom….they have what I would consider as "little country syndrome”:)

@user-sn2jg6re1d

2 жыл бұрын

땅은 크나 마음이 작아 중국이라지요

@Thinkofwhat

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-sn2jg6re1d English perhaps my East Asian cousin:)

@user-de1pd1de5n

2 жыл бұрын

I also consider Chinese as "Wide country syndrome", which is Burning their traditional things.

@user-sn2jg6re1d

2 жыл бұрын

@@Thinkofwhat 그대도 마음이 작은자인가? 뇌도 작은가? 생각도 작은자!!

@michelangelosimoni2324

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-sn2jg6re1d What are you barking my little one?

As a Korean I think we can all get along and respect each other in present time.

@JENNYLEEWORLD

Жыл бұрын

Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.

@sea618

Жыл бұрын

@@JENNYLEEWORLD I don't know if it is written in your country's history book. If it is, I can only say that you are ignorant and very ignorant. Respect for history is respect for yourself. Obviously, you can't do it. You won't admit that South Korea was a subsidiary of China in ancient times, nor that it was enslaved by Japan in modern times, nor that it is now a dog of the United States. South Korea now wants to build cultural confidence, but you don't have much culture at all, so you can only make it up, The south is obviously more suitable for survival. Only a fool can take tens of thousands of people to the north. The world thinks that you Koreans can only steal and have no shame

@JENNYLEEWORLD

Жыл бұрын

@@sea618 USA western world saved china from Japan WW2. Japan wiped out more than 49 million Chinese. Today china is factory dog of USA and world. Koreans created japan. Japanese emperors all koreans. USA respects Korea and helped become rich. Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.

@JENNYLEEWORLD

Жыл бұрын

@@sea618 Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.,..,,.

@JENNYLEEWORLD

Жыл бұрын

@@sea618 Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.,...

미안한데 전세계인들이 이미 한복이 한국의 전통의상이라는걸 다알아

@user-hv8fw1hb1n

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, South Koreans have the smallest eyes in the world.

@Lord_Unicorn

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-hv8fw1hb1n and Chinese has small pp

@user-fk5kr9gx6q

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-hv8fw1hb1n It has a big terrytorry. But it has a small magnanimity. That's why we call it a "country in the middle." In Chinese; 中国

@user-hv8fw1hb1n

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-fk5kr9gx6q 9.6 million square kilometers in China 100000 square kilometers in South Korea 1 China = 96 South Korea Lol

@user-iw4hw8ge9c

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-hv8fw1hb1n yes chinese copy everything hahaahaha

评论区给爷整笑了，一个个复制粘贴啥呢这是，他们是有个组织还是都是机器人哦？

@lona6418

3 жыл бұрын

老饭圈了，毕竟拿得出手的只有偶像文化嘛

@dushineiku7860

3 жыл бұрын

饭圈阴阳人鼻祖啦

@rukalinnn

3 жыл бұрын

老阴间复读机了😂

@hehe9226

3 жыл бұрын

@JW Yoo oh thank you！ shame on you korea and Korean too～

@wowfactor202

3 жыл бұрын

@@hehe9226 pathetic life. keep it up!

This what you call red herring. The reason why this is an issue is because Chinese are claiming Hanbok is Chinese. No Koreans claim Hanfu is Korean except for fringe trolls

That comment is just a work of troll. All civilized people knew that Hanbok and Kimono had been influenced by Hanfu (not copying,though,since lots of detail of which had been altered.), hence the term "Sinophere". So just don't feed the troll. But having fight back with info and knowledge like you did in this clip is a creative one 😊

@sara.cbc92

6 ай бұрын

There was a Japanese channel that actually admit Kimono was from Hanfu but Korean trolls attacked the comment section.

史书有记载朝鲜王曾多次遣使向明朝廷请求赐予官服 我记得朝鲜官服等级是必须低于明朝官服二品的 在韩剧里，大明朝赐服朝鲜的桥段也不少吧？

@gloriataro3509

3 жыл бұрын

Hanfu influenced hanbok from early time, since Tang, Song, Ming Dynasty Costumes of Ming Dynasty influenced Korea / was awarded to Korea, which was a vassal region under Ming Dynasty. The emperor of Ming welcomed Korean officials to visit Ming palace and learn Ming systems of all kinds, including Chinese characters, political system and costumes. The emperor of Ming awarded costumes to Korea, and Korea took it as a honor, applying all kind of Ming systems to Korea. A king of Korea said: ‘Korea is the good son while Japan is the evil son’, which was recorded in an ancient book. This is the vassal relationship, which is why Ming Dynasty protected Korea from being invaded by Japanese. If you want to see the true history, it’s all written in ancient books and antiques in the historical museums of all kinds. Even Korean ancient books are in Chinese. Korean people cannot see the true history without learning Chinese.

@user-ym2dg3cw5q

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-td2jl9gv5v 每个文明都有兴衰起伏的时候，重要的是有人为她努力复兴，朝鲜半岛自立国以来周遭强敌环伺，不是向强国臣服，就是被攻打占领。至今分裂只能充当殖民者的一粒棋子，和某些人一样已经快要忘记自己的历史了，可以理解

@runzhili6495

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-td2jl9gv5v what is ur point？

@skim2517

3 жыл бұрын

他们的建筑也是不能用明黄色

@user-gn4ny1gb3e

3 жыл бұрын

한국군 위안부 명성황후 강간 당하다 병자호란 남한산성 북한은 몽골, 위안 왕조, 중국 당나라, 명나라에 젊은 여성을 기부했습니다

예전엔 가만히 있다가 킹덤이나 한류가 외국에서 유명해지고 뜨기시작하니까 하나둘씩 한복 원래 중국꺼야 ㅇㅈㄹ하는거봐ㅋㅋㅋㅋ존나 투명하다 투명해 좋은건 다 니들꺼지? 적당히해 영어쓰면서 겁나 논리적인척하면 진짜 중국꺼네 할줄 아나봄? 한복은 한국에서 민주화 운동의 상징인데 중국도 민주화를 원하는걸로 받아들여야할듯~여러개의 중국 응원해

@johnkim178

3 жыл бұрын

@qe 由于您的努力，朝鲜族解放联盟现在比以往任何时候都更加强大。 我们必须在公安发现之前采取行动

@mimujj2272

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnkim178 한복은 독립운동의 상징이지! 한복을 입고 3.1운동을 했단다.혹시 너도 홍콩이나 대만, 티벳의 독립을 지지한다면 한복을 입어줘!

@xudesaix6257

3 жыл бұрын

@@mimujj2272 韓服은 獨立運動의 象徵이지! 韓服을 입고 3.1運動을 했단다.혹시 너도 홍콩이나 臺灣, 티벳의 獨立을 支持한다면 韓服을 입어줘 위에서 말한 댓글 쓰기의 진정한 방법입니다

@user-bh8of8te6j

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnkim178 오늘 중국 minzoo화 결사대 비밀모임 날이었잖아!!!! 왜 안온거야? GONG-AN에 포획당한건 아니지?? 우리 이번달 드레스코드는 HANBOK 이었는데 다음모임때는 꼭 입고와줘!

@user-ic6qx4dy5y

3 жыл бұрын

@@xudesaix6257 okok～free taiwan～Who cares?kimchi man🤣

Buddhism originated in India (the Kingdom of Kapila at the time .. present day Nepal) and was transmitted to China.

democracy democracy democracy democracy democracy democracy democracy democracy democracy democracy democracy democracy democracy democracy democracy democracy

@sleefy2343

26 күн бұрын

Bro keep quiet This ain’t about democracy

我认为这个视频下面需要有更多汉字的评论，快要被韩文淹没了

@dandana14

3 жыл бұрын

上次说要为香港示威加油的是什么?

@user-ml7ng9nh5u

3 жыл бұрын

@@dandana14 nmsl

@dandana14

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-ml7ng9nh5u 小心被当局逮住 / 工作一结束手机就销毁

@dandana14

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-ml7ng9nh5u 我认为,为了摆脱中国的通信网,在韩国网站上用韩文进行民主化运动是非常好的。

@dandana14

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-ml7ng9nh5u 你说得对,台湾和香港是中国独立的国家

중국이 중국한거지~~이러다가 한글까지 지네들꺼라 우기겠네ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

@jmhan4219

3 жыл бұрын

ALREADY CHINA HAVE DISTORTED THAT HANGEUL IS CHINESE' THING.... VERY RIDICULOUS...ㅡㅡ;;

@user-dh5gi8wf9k

3 жыл бұрын

ㄴㄴ 한글 자기네꺼라고 할려면 한자버리고 한글 배워야하는데 그 많은 인구가 다 배울려면 시간도 좀 걸리고 그렇다고 한글을 자기네 꺼라고 할려면 말이 안됨. 왜냐하면 세종대왕이 직접 백성들을 위해 만들었기 때문.

@huijeongoh9307

3 жыл бұрын

훈민정음에서 어떻게 만들었는지 적혀있으니 건들면 무식 인증

@mk-3992

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-qq9he1pw3x 조만간 그것도 중국꺼라고 우기고 지들땅꺼라고 가져갈듯함

@mk-3992

3 жыл бұрын

@@huijeongoh9307 한복을 우기고있으니 한글도 우기는건 쉬울듯함 한글도 자기네가 인쇄해서 자비로 배풀엇다고 그렇게날조할것같음

“洪武二年，高麗入朝，請賜祭服制度，命制給之” 南韓人請尊重歷史！

@laughing6206

2 жыл бұрын

@@csik7996 한국은그들의문화가없다는것을폭로하고, 매일중국의것을표절하고, 중국사람들의웃음거리가되고, 한국은그들의역사가오래다고하지만이름난명인한사람을내지못한다고말했다.중국역사는 모르시겠지만 삼국지는 해보셨죠.이것은 문화 지식 아니, 한국은 모두 중국의 성어와 음식 문화를 포함합니다.한국은 오직 성형의 걸 그룹 문화 👎

@laughing6206

2 жыл бұрын

@@csik7996 USA🇰🇷🐶

@warriorssilla88

Жыл бұрын

@@laughing6206 Not only the "fake Korean Wave," which openly copies Korean trademarks and products, but also the "fake Korean Wave," a foreign product packaged as if it were a Korean product, is a headache. This is because the low quality of such "fake Korean Wave" products sold overseas may lower the reliability of Korean products to foreign consumers and negatively affect the Korean image. Logos of major "Fake Korean Wave" companies. According to the distribution industry and KOTRA on the 19th, MUMUSO, a Chinese household goods store, is mentioned as a representative example. Although its headquarters is a Chinese company in Shanghai, China, it uses "KR" for brand marks and imitates Korean products and designs. The product belongs to a Chinese company, and the packaging is also distributed with false Hangul and Korean-related logos engraved. Mugunghwa Life is conducting business in more than 30 countries around the world, opening stores in Uruguay and UAE last year. Chinese company Ilahui is operating in major countries in a similar form. The logo is equipped with "KOREA" to advocate a Korean brand. In addition, KIODA (You're cute), YOYOSO (Hansangwoopum), MINIGOOD (Sammu), and XIMISO (Himmyo) have jumped on the Korean Wave and are thriving in Southeast Asia. Those who use Hangul that is not grammatically correct or sell products that plagiarize Korean products and designs are mistaken for Korean brands there. Chinese products sold by "Fake Korean Wave" companies. Awkward Korean expressions stand out. The Korean court ordered the dissolution of Mugunghwa Life and Yeonhye Woopum's Korean subsidiary in 2019. It is believed that a ghost corporation was established in Korea to avoid crackdowns and sanctions by local patent authorities while selling products imitating Korean products on a large scale overseas. In addition, the Korean Intellectual Property Office and the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy have also responded by requesting governments in major countries to investigate and crack down. Since then, the government explained that there have been fewer explicit Korean impersonations, such as promoting products in hanbok or specifying that they are Korean brands, but there are still many cases of clever copying of Korean brands and products.

@warriorssilla88

Жыл бұрын

@@laughing6206 1. Since ancient times, Chinese people have been the center of civilization. There is no culture in the surrounding peoples. - Ancient Chinese recorded that they were culturally influenced by the eastern immigrants. Now, it is creating a miracle logic to include the entire Asia in China. 2. China does not stxxal Korean culture.Korea is stealing Chinese culture. It's a typical lie. At the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics, traditional Korean culture was used. Is this all? The Chinese are manipulating that the language of Koreans is part of Chinese. 3. Western media is framing China. - They are claiming to be right, but the lie was eventually revealed. A perfect defense excuse. Numerous people are suffering from China's txxxft of high-tech technologies from other countries. However, the Chinese are pretending not to know even though they know. Conclusion: Unable to communicate with Chinese people They don't feel guilxxy even though they lie. This is the completion of self-dexxption.

@warriorssilla88

Жыл бұрын

@@laughing6206 "중국인들의 계획적인 거짓말" 중국 광저우(廣州)에서 발간되는 신쾌보(新快報)는 최근 ''한중문화 전쟁''이라는특집기사를 통해 한국이 한자를 세계문화유산으로 등재하려는 움직임을 보이고 있다고 전했다. 신쾌보의 보도에 따르면 지난해 ''박정수 서울대 역사학과 교수''가 10여년의 연구 결과 한(韓)민족이 한자를 발명한 이후 중국 중원(中原)으로 옮겨가 한자를 중국에 전하면서 지금의 한족(漢族) 문화가 형성됐다고 주장했다. 박 교수는 한국 정부에 떳떳하게 한자 문화를 복원하고 유네스코에 한자를 세계문화유산으로 신청할 것을 건의했다는 것이다. 그러나 서울대 국사학과나 동양사학과 등에 재직중인 교수중에 ''박정수''라는 이름을 가진 교수는 없으며 한국이 한자를 홀로 세계문화유산으로 등재하려는 움직임도 전혀 없는 것으로 확인되고 있다. 이런 잘못된 보도는 13일 홍콩 문회보(文匯報) 등에도 인용되며 중국 네티즌들의 엉뚱한 분노를 사고 있다. 한국에서 유학했다는 한 중국 네티즌은 한글이 15세기에야 창제됐음을 상기시키며 "이는 중국문화에 대한 도둑질"이라고 주장했다. 신문은 나아가 한국을 필두로 한 중국, 일본, 대만 4개국 학자들이 최근 베이징국제한자회의에서 번체자(繁體字.한국과 대만에서 사용하는 정체자)를 기초로 한 상용 표준한자를 만들기로 했다는 소식을 전하며 반한 감정을 부추기고 있다. 신문은 또 4개국 학자의 표준한자 합의 소식을 부인하며 "간체자(簡體字)는 중국의 법정 문자로 절대 바꿀 수 없는 것"이라는 중국측 대표의 발언을 전하기도 했다. 이밖에도 중국 언론은 강릉단오제의 세계문화유산 등재 이후 한국에서 제기되는 한의학, 두유, 풍수지리 등의 한반도론 주장을 시시콜콜 전하면서 중국 문화를 한국에 빼앗기고 있다는 피해의식에 사로잡혀 있다. 유교 창시자인 공자나 월나라 미인 서시(西施), 명나라 시기 본초강목(本草綱目)의 저자 이시진(李時珍)이 한반도에서 넘어왔다는 근거 불명의 한국내 주장까지 일일이 소개하고 있다. 한국인들은 그런적 없는데 계속 거짓말하네 ㅎ ㅡㅡ 누구말이 맞는지 유네스코에 확인해 보자. 진짜 계획적으로 모함을 하네 ㅎ 이거 중국 공 산 당 이 한국 혐오하게 만드려고 퍼뜨린 거짓말인거 이미 들통났다

If you have studied the history of East Asia, you will find that almost all the ancient books of Korea were written in Chinese characters before the 20th century. Korea has been an affiliated country of China for 1000 years. In ancient times, Korea did not have its own characters. It was not until the 15th century that King Sejong of Korea invented the Korean characters, but they were not popularized. At the end of the 19th century, Korea was occupied by Japan and broke away from China. In the 20th century, Korean nationalist movement rose, and Korean talents abolished Chinese characters and used Korean characters. Up to now,south Korean identity cards are still marked with Chinese characters, because Korean characters are a kind of phonetic symbols, which can not distinguish different names. Many names with the same pronunciation are easy to be confused.

@nationfighting3929

2 жыл бұрын

Don't lie Chinese people who have been ruled by other peoples for more than 1000 years have distorted history There was no kingdom that Korea relied on China except for the Joseon Dynasty When Tang of China invaded the Korean Peninsula in 675, Silla blocked it well, and during the Goryeo Dynasty, China's Song Dynasty was conquered by Jurchen and Mongol while sending tribute to neighboring countries. The ancient kingdom of China was periodically destroyed by other peoples every 300 years, but ancient the ruler of Korean kingdom was always Korean. Joseon was an independent country different from China. The concept of a subsidiary state cannot be applied. This is because even when Song, Yuan, MING, and Qing of China were destroyed, the kingdom of the Korean Peninsula had nothing to do with it. The Chinese treated Korea as their subsidiary country, but since ancient times, Korea has been a different culture and society from China. For example, the Chinese have maintained the footbinding culture for over 1,000 years, but there was no such culture in ancient Korea. Since ancient times, China has been invaded by many other ethnic groups and there have been many natural disasters and famine, so the culture of eating people has been maintained until the 20th century, but there is no such culture in Korea. Even now, Chinese people still have a culture of taking medicine made from the umbilical cord of newborn babies and using newborn babies for medicine. It is completely narcissism that the Chinese take pride in ancient history and culture

@zzzhuoer3206

2 жыл бұрын

Yes and that is so pathetic. Koreans cannot read chinese characters, which means most of korean people cannot understand thier true ancient history. In this way, they'll follow the posts on the Internet instead of learning chinese to read their history which recorded in chinese. Zazaza

@666Yourkarma

Жыл бұрын

China is established in 100years they are just united tribes

@666Yourkarma

Жыл бұрын

Hanfu is from Korea And Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China Hanfu is from Korea When Korea conquered China before Ming dynasty . Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China Hanfu prove our history letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture Not from China We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?

@user-oy4ht7oc7w

Жыл бұрын

korean characters also came from Chinese price marking symbols dating back hundreds of years before korean characters~

중국은 영어도 중국어사투리라고 우기더니만 이제 한복도 자기네꺼라고 우기네 왜 우주도 너네꺼라고 우겨라 불쌍한민족 지들문화는 하나도 없음 中国向来以英文和中国方言求爱，但现在韩服在向它求爱，说那是你的，为什么要向世界求爱呢？没有贫穷的民族文化。 China wooed that both English and Chinese dialect, but now the Hanbok is wooing, it’s yours.

@DX-dh3tz

3 жыл бұрын

边夷贱类，不足待以仁义，不可责以常礼。

@user-le6tv2ky6t

3 жыл бұрын

@@DX-dh3tz Hanbok = Korean traditional costume.

@makotomato5380

3 жыл бұрын

What I know are: 1. The auto-translation sucks, 2. You don't even watch the first 30s of this video and you just trynna pretend to be a victim. 他这用的啥翻译软件啊功能好差中文英文都翻的好烂额！百度翻译贴了一下你的韩语倒还能看懂点……大家不要用这个人用的翻译软件啊啊啊啊

@user-le6tv2ky6t

3 жыл бұрын

@@makotomato5380 Support Taiwan independence 타이완독립을 지지합니다 支持台湾独立 تەيۋەن مۇستەقىللىقىنى قوللايدۇ

@user-le6tv2ky6t

3 жыл бұрын

@@DX-dh3tz Support Taiwan independence 타이완독립을 지지합니다 支持台湾独立 تەيۋەن مۇستەقىللىقىنى قوللايدۇ

说的事实 泡菜朝鲜服是朝鲜的 但发源地不是 正视自己的历史 而不是政府美化后的历史

@user-et1ce8xj6c

3 жыл бұрын

首爾為什麼叫漢城

@jiangkyle2553

3 жыл бұрын

弹丸之地，从古至今一直都是个别人的附属国，仰人鼻息生活，古代一直都是中国的附属藩国，现代又是美国的狗儿子？咋了，当了几千年的儿子。给你们当上瘾了？？？

@yumoz

3 жыл бұрын

为什么你的头像这么搞笑

@nana-wk1qy

3 жыл бұрын

看清楚，发源地不是朝鲜我说错了？

@lightoffire7085

3 жыл бұрын

被误伤了😂

*The key to achieving hegemony in East Asia and the world* All East Asians were born from K people (pls see my previous comments), so getting closer to K (parents) brings blessings. Thus, historically, the country who honored and respected K achieved hegemony in East Asia. It applies to non-Asians also. The founding ideology of Gojoseon (the first K nation) was 弘益人間 which means *“widely benefit the human world”* [三國遺事]. What a beautiful ideology suitable for the 21st century! No country in human history has such kind of philanthropic founding ideology. *Everything is to be done as it is said: K people are parents and exist to widely benefit the human world.* That’s why getting closer to K and befriending K people bring blessings, and breaking off relations with K brings misfortune. I’ll show some historical evidence: 1. *Sui dynasty (581AD ~ 618AD)* unified C for the first time since AD. They waged three big wars against K (Goguryo). In their third invasion, they attacked Goguryo with 1.14 million troops which was the biggest war in human history before WW1, but they were brutally defeated and finally collapsed. 2. *Tang dynasty (618AD ~ 907AD)* was the most brilliant dynasty in C history and Tang Taizong, who is considered the greatest hero in C history, waged many wars against K (Goguryo), but they were defeated. Tang eventually formed an alliance with another K (Silla), and was able to destroy Goguryo. Even though they initially faced big misfortunes by attacking K, these misfortunes could be offset by the blessings of making alliance with another K (Silla). Later, Tang achieved big blessings by having strong tie with K (Silla). 3. *Jin (金) dynasty* considered K (Silla) as their origin [金史] and never waged war against K (Goryeo), so they got blessing and achieved hegemony by acquiring Central Plan (中原). 4. *Mongol* General 哈眞 made a brotherhood treaty (兄弟之盟) with K (Goryeo) in 1218AD and said “Our two countries have become brothers forever, let's not make our children forget it even after 10,000 years (萬世)”, then they got big blessings and were able to occupy the biggest land in human history. 5. *Mongol* Kublai Khan made a special peace treaty with K (Goryeo), so got big blessing and founded Yuan dynasty in 1270AD. He loved Goryeo so much and said “I see Goryeo as one family (一家) with us. If Goryeo faces hard times, how could I not rescue Goryeo?”. Yuan dynasty granted autonomy to Goryeo and married their princesses to the kings of Goryeo. 6. *Qing* invaded K (Joseon) and forced to make a brotherhood treaty (兄弟之盟). After getting K (Joseon) to his side, Qing was able to take over China. From the Ming Dynasty's perspective, they suffered the great misfortune of losing the entire country to the Qing as a result of not providing military aid to Joseon. Qing was able to occupy K (Joseon), but never did it. People say it’s a big mystery. The reason was Manchus had a special kinship feeling towards K people. Manchus tried to find their origin from K (Silla) in [滿洲源流考][金史]. So, they were blessed and lasted long. Both the Mongols and Manchus had special kinship feeling towards K people. All East Asians were born from K people, thus have innate affection for K. 7. *Japan* annexed K in 1910AD without war, which was the first time for K to lose autonomy through entire K history. This was not to bless J, but because it was 天 (heaven)'s punishment for the most corrupt K government in K history. Whatever the reason, J, which acquired K, gained hegemony in East Asia. However, J tried to place their parents K people below them, minimized K's ancient history, and increasingly persecuted K people, thus eventually collapsed. Then, K experienced even more severe punishment - war and division of South and North. *All of this was a pain that had to be experienced before being newly born and becoming a light to East Asia and to the world.* 8. *U.S.* who has hegemony in East Asia now, has a strong alliance with K. *Question: Currently, K is divided into South and North. In this situation, which K should we get closer to?* Then answer is South. Why? The reason is Gojoseon in Liaohe, who was the origin of K, migrated to the South and founded Mahan [三國志: “With every dawn, many (Gojoseon) refugees flowed into Mahan's homeland, and Mahan was founded"]. Qin (秦) people, who were another branch of Gojoseon, also migrated to South K [三國志, 後漢書: “Jinhan (Silla) old people said they were refugees from Qin (秦) to avoid hard labor, and Mahan allocated the eastern border (Jinhan)”]. Thus, Mahan and Jinhan, which were located in South K, became the final destination and safe haven for the descendants of Gojoseon. That’s why South K was protected, and South K (Silla) unified Three Kingdoms of K and Tang dynasty who had alliance with Silla was blessed. Manchus (Qing) were blessed because they sought their origins to Silla (South K) rather than Goguryeo (North K). During K war, US who chose South K have been blessed. *There have been big mysteries in East Asian history:* Mongols (Yuan) was able to annex K (Goryeo), but they didn’t. They granted autonomy to Goryeo even though Goryeo was located right in front to their capital (Beijing). Manchus (Qing) was able to annex K. They invaded K (Goryeo), captured the capital of Goryeo and subjugated the King of Goryeo. However, they didn’t annex K. Instead, they forced K to make brotherhood treaty (兄弟之盟) with them and retreated. During J invasion of K (Joseon) in 1592AD, J army captured up to Pyongyang, but stopped its advance even though Uiju, where the king of Joseon had taken refuge, was very close. 懲毖錄(징비록), which was a best seller book in Joseon and Japan written by 류성룡(柳成龍) right after the J invasions of K (Joseon), says “The J army stopped in Pyongyang was truly the Will of Heaven and not something that could be done by human power.” This was one of the main reasons why J eventually failed to occupy K. K people are parents of East Asians, and it has been 天 (heaven)’s Will to protect K who are destined to unite all his children and become the light and spiritual leader in East Asia.

韩国古书里只有"汉服"二字，从来没出现过"韩服"二字，说明韩国古人知道他们的服饰来自汉服，包括韩国古人描述他们新罗/高丽/朝鲜等时期的服饰时，都是用"中华制""唐风/唐国服/唐衣""悉同中国""上国同"等词语来描述，并且记载了中国各朝代给韩国各朝代的赐服， 请大家了解古代韩国服饰都是从中国传过去的，即使赐服给韩国，也是中国服饰，不是赐给韩国就可以称韩服，《高丽史·舆服志》："东国自三韩仪章服饰循习土风，至新罗太宗王请袭唐仪，是后冠服之制稍拟中华"。《燃藜室记述》冠服条："吾东自三国以来，冠服皆循土风。新罗武烈王法唐制，仪章服饰稍拟中华"，贞观二十二年（649），新罗道臣入唐，学习汉制。《新罗本纪》记载：“春秋又请改其章服，以从中华制。”新罗真德王"请袭唐仪"，唐太宗赐新罗衣冠，文武王“又革妇人之服，自此已后，衣冠同于中国”。《新罗本纪》“真德王三年正月，始服中朝衣冠”。 早期王氏高丽时期:高丽王健:"惟我东方旧慕唐风，文物礼乐悉尊其制"。《宣和奉使高丽图经》描写高丽衣冠制度“遵我宋之制度焉”。《高丽史》“三十二年六月，宋神宗赐衣二对”等。元朝时高丽穿胡服，所以高丽末期请求明朝赐服:《高丽史·舆服志》:事元以来，开剃辫发、袭胡服，殆将百年。及大明太祖高皇帝赐恭愍王冕服，王妃、群臣亦皆有赐，自是衣冠文物焕然复新，彬彬乎古矣"。《明史·舆服志》:洪武二年，高丽入朝，请赐祭服制度，命制给之”。高丽国王及世子冕服、王妃翟衣的沿用及改革，就是以明朝所赐章服为基础。自此高丽开始依照明朝衣制从上而下改革。 李氏朝鲜按照明制汉服进行服饰改革，下令“复行洪武年号,袭大明衣冠、禁胡服"，频繁朝贡赐服让朝鲜衣冠和“上国同”，朝鲜人崔溥《漂海录》提到:“盖我朝鲜地虽海外，衣冠文物悉同中国” 朝鲜文人徐居正诗云“明皇若问三韩事，衣冠文物上国同” 李氏朝鲜《成宗实录》:"吾东方自箕子以来，教化大行，男有烈士之风，女有贞正之俗，史称小中华”。​

@mrbat3742

2 жыл бұрын

@@cosmob9602 中国自隋唐以来就开始了民族大融合，现在哪里还有纯正血统的汉人，自隋唐以来，中国的汉人，就已经不是之前的汉人了，都是胡人和汉人的融合，胡人指得就是匈奴、鲜卑、羯、氐、羌，比如说我，是蒙古族和满族以及汉族的结合，而我们每个民族都认为对汉服文化做出了贡献，这才有了现在的汉服，所以现在的新汉人的祖先不应该单纯的只有汉人，也应该有胡人。

@mrbat3742

2 жыл бұрын

@@cosmob9602 中国自隋唐以来就开始了民族大融合，现在哪里还有纯正血统的汉人，自隋唐民族大融合以来，中国的汉人，就已经不是之前的汉人了，都是胡人和汉人的融合，胡人指得就是匈奴、鲜卑、羯、氐、羌，比如说我，我是蒙古族和满族以及汉族的结合，而我们每个民族都认为对汉服文化做出了贡献，这才有了现在的汉服，而不同朝代有不同朝代的服饰，所以现在的中国人的基因上除了汉人基因，也有胡人基因，我不知道你说汉服不是汉人做的是什么意思，建议你去了解一下汉服的演变史，殷商后，冠服制度初步建立，西周时，服饰制度逐渐形成。，汉代秦之初至东汉明帝时期，服饰端庄、典雅，魏晋轻灵飘逸、仙气飘飘，唐制汉服，雍容华贵，宋制汉服含蓄简约，明制汉服优雅大方。

@mrbat3742

2 жыл бұрын

@@cosmob9602 这就是汉服，如果你认为它只是概念，那么我的祖先穿的是什么呢？古画中记载了我们祖先的服饰，这个博主其他视频里也介绍了，如果你想了解的话，就去看一下这个博主的其他视频。

@mrbat3742

2 жыл бұрын

@@cosmob9602 看来你还是不太了解我们国家的文化，这个up主展示的是纯正的汉服，我出生在中国的内蒙古，我们的少数民族服饰叫蒙古袍，和汉服完全是两个概念，如果你想了解的话，你可以去搜索一下蒙古袍。我们56个民族都有各自的衣服，和汉族是完全不同的。而这个博主其他视频展示的确确实实都是汉服，因为在油管我很少看到有人展示除了汉服以外的其他中国少数民族的衣服。

@mrbat3742

2 жыл бұрын

@@cosmob9602 中国每个少数民族都有各自的服饰，蒙古族的叫蒙古袍，满族的服饰叫旗袍，还有回族服饰，等等我就不一一列举了，还有汉服的各个朝代的服饰，这个博主展示的视频确实都是汉服，你和我谈论我们民族的服饰之前最起码应该做些了解，不能把汉服和其他少数民族的衣服混淆，当然我们所有民族加起来的文化，才使得我们华夏文明更加多姿多彩。

《三国史记》中的《新罗本纪》中有“真德王三年正月，始服中朝衣冠”的记载。 《宣和奉使高丽图经》在描写高丽衣冠制度上有“遵我宋之制度焉”的记录。 《高丽史》中也有“三十二年六月，宋神宗赐衣二对”的记录。 崔溥《漂海录》提到：“盖我朝鲜地虽海外，衣冠文物悉同中国” 朝鲜文人徐居正诗云“明皇若问三韩事，衣冠文物上国同” 李氏朝鲜《成宗实录》中，也有过类似的记载： “吾东方自箕子以来，教化大行，男有烈士之风，女有贞正之俗，史称小中华”。 All those korea historical document are described korea hanbok was heavily influenced by chinese hanfu. After korea prohibited using chinese as official language they are losing there hiatoey too. It's very sad that Koreans can't read their own hiatoey document witch is written in chinese.

@padeng555

3 жыл бұрын

Its very stupid for China to say hanbok and kimchi are Chinese all of sudden in 2020 while China had their mouth shut for past centuries. 🤣🤣 Maybe they got jealous cuz of K culture and K Pop being famous

@padeng555

3 жыл бұрын

Being us the source ^^ We do not want your LIE Korea has been using korean langauge since 1500, when hanbok was prevailing. Please STOP LYING 🤔🤔

@yiningli9251

3 жыл бұрын

别发史料，他们会过来骗资料然后写到自己的历史里。

@alexandragomez4276

3 жыл бұрын

@@yiningli9251 都是他们自己的

@shiyiwang4491

3 жыл бұрын

@@padeng555 wow, are you sure? i thought y’all started using in 1970s. fuck kff

한복이 중국께 아니라 코로나 미세먼지가 중국꺼지.....

@Hijoon

3 жыл бұрын

옳소!

@mariaking8601

3 жыл бұрын

한국은 성형 수술 얼굴로 가득하다 . 아시아에서 가장 못생긴 사람들.

@Hijoon

3 жыл бұрын

@@mariaking8601 동굴에서 살다오셨나요? ^^

@user-wr5fk4hw5i

3 жыл бұрын

@@mariaking8601 자기소개 잘들었어요

@Impossibility_Theorem

3 жыл бұрын

성형 대국은 한국이 아니라 중국이다. 그것은 이미 10년전의 옛날 얘기이다. 한국보다도 중국의 성형 산업과 성형 시장은 더 규모가 크고 위대하다. 너희 시짆핑도 얼굴에 보톡스를 맞았고, 돈 많은 중국의 부자들도 보톡스를 맞고, 그들을 따라하려는 중국인들은 얼굴에 시멘트를 삽입한다. 성형시장의 규모부터 확인해라. 위대한 중국의 성형 산업을 찬양하고 현실을 봐라. 그리고 너도 보톡스를 맞으러 가면 된다.

Many C people criticize when K celebrities introduced some culture originated from C as oriental style. Then, why do they (C people) call Son Heun-Min as pride of Asia rather than pride of Korea? When you want to promote your culture or anything, you need to do that by your own effort without attempting to get free ride on Hallyu. Germans or French don't get angry when other European countries call their culture as western culture. When we call something as oriental style, mostly China is recalled because C heavily influenced east Asia unlike Europe where not a single country was dominant, so C people must be rather satisfied with that kind of terms.

@adaada4523

Жыл бұрын

on Heun-Min？他是谁？中国人都不认识他是谁？整天制造谣言，自娱自乐，搭韩国便车？韩国真是太把自己当回事了吧

@666Yourkarma

Жыл бұрын

Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China Hanfu is from Korea wen Korea ruled China before Ming dynasty we influenced in China 1500years ago Koreans are from Mongolian our culture and Dna is very different with China. Just that’s science and truth. China kills and buried and burned ur owned culture Protect ur original culture Koreans and all world liked ur origin Not copy from others Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China Hanfu prove our history letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture Not from China We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others? Hanfu has existed in Ming Dynasty But Text of Hanfu has been created just 20years ago You guys haven’t wore thousands years and even 10years ago. You suddenly started wear hanfu just in 10years You guys insist Hanfu is origin. Korea has been Manchuria before ming dynasty Hanbok has been for a long time in Korea Youguys insist Ours r from Korea We don’t say Kimono is from Korea even though we have wore Kimono for along time No one says kimono is Korean cloth China is greedy China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others? China will be broken Chinese will admit their greedy fault and Tibet and Hongkong and Taiwan will be happy and free China will be heaven when they will be broken completely

明朝當時國力與朝鮮是相對強勢的，而且漢服一路從更早到唐、宋、元、明各朝代都有發展脈絡，是自成一眽的。而後來到清朝又發展出旗袍，這比較常見於國際，明代漢服比較少穿出來，所以不為人所熟知了。

한삼 맨날 미국싫다싫다하면서 영어로 설명하는거 무엇?ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

@user-pn8xt3ce9q

3 жыл бұрын

영어는 영국꺼자나...

@user-or5do5we8t

3 жыл бұрын

ㅋㅋ근데 영어도 중국의 사투리라고 우겼다가 기사한번 났다고함ㅋㅋ엌ㅋㅋ

@ghvriych6dcv

3 жыл бұрын

다들 동영상 보지말고 신고 고고

@user-en9bu9ul7c

3 жыл бұрын

listen to your ancestors, you pathetic creature read your history, oops sorry, they are written in Chinese, you can't understand. Hahahahaha Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty Volume 36 고종실록 고종 36권 朝鮮王朝實錄 高宗 36卷： AD 1897“我邦疆土, 係是漢、唐古地, 衣冠文物, 悉遵宋、明遺制, 接其統, 而襲其號, 無所不可" “우리나라의 강토는 한(漢) 나라와 당(唐) 나라의 옛 땅에 붙어있고 의관(衣冠)과 문물(文物)은 다 송(宋) 나라나 명(明) 나라의 옛 제도를 따르고 있으니, 그 계통을 잇고 그 칭호를 그대로 쓴들 안 될 것이 없습니다” “The territories of Korea used to be the ancient land of Han and Tang. Our costumes and relics conformed to Song. The kingdom system and structure adopted from Ming. It is rightful and legal to inherit the true name of Greater China and her culture - Joseon Gojong조선고종 高宗” History of Goryeo 고려사권 137권 (高麗史 137卷): AD 1392“復行洪武年號，襲大明衣冠,禁胡服” “부행홍무년호 습대명의복 금호복”“Joseon Dynasty shall adopt the era name of Hongwu of Ming, wear Ming costumes and headgears, ban Hu Dress” Taejo of Goryeos' Ten Rules 왕이 훈요10조를 내리다 高麗太祖 訓要十條: AD 943"惟我東方, 舊慕唐風, 文物禮樂, 悉遵其制, 殊方異土, 人性各異, 不必苟同. 契丹是禽獸之國, 風俗不同, 言語亦異, 衣冠制度, 愼勿效焉"“우리 동방(東方)은 옛날부터 중국의 풍속[唐風]을 흠모하여 문물(文物)과 예악(禮樂)이 다 그 제도를 따랐으나, 지역이 다르고 인성(人性)도 각기 다르므로 꼭 같게 할 필요는 없다. 거란(契丹)은 짐승과 같은 나라로 풍속이 같지 않고 말도 다르니 의관제도(衣冠制度)를 삼가 본받지 말라”"We, the East admire the customs of the Tang Dynasty, learn her rite and music, adopt her system and style. People from far land are different from us in terms of humanity, do not try to make them look similar in a subservient manner. The nature of Khitan (契丹) is brutal and bestial, we do not share the same value or language with them, so do not follow their system of attire" Samguk Sagi Volumn 5『삼국사기』권5 『三國史記』卷5 : AD 649“(真德王) 三年,春正月，始服中朝衣冠”“(진덕왕) 3년(649) 봄 정월에 비로소 중국의 의관(衣冠)을 착용하였다”" In the third year of Jindeok, the first month of spring, people in Silla (South Korea) started to wear Chinese-style cloth and hats" Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀) : AD 648“春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製” “춘추가 또한 장복(章服)을 고쳐서 중국의 제도에 따를 것을 청하자”" Gim Chunchu 무열왕 asked the Emperor of Tang for permission to change the traditional cloth of Silla, the country shall follow the Chinese style " 삼국사기 제28권 백제본기 제6 三國史記 卷第二十八 百濟本紀 第六“高句麗亦以高辛氏之後 姓高氏 古史曰 百濟與高句麗 同出扶餘 又云 秦漢亂離之時 中國人多竄海東 則三國祖先 豈其古聖人之苗裔耶”“고구려는 역시 고신씨(高辛氏)3)의 후손이라 하여 고씨로 성을 삼았다고 한다. 의 기록에 보인다.] 고사(古史)에 이르기를 “백제와 고구려가 모두 부여에서 나왔다.”고 하며, 또 “진, 한의 난리 때 중국 사람이 해동으로 많이 왔다.”고도 한다. 그렇다면 삼국의 조상들은 어찌 옛 성인의 후예가 아니겠는가?”“Goguryeo is descendants of Gaoyang Clan, so the surname Gao is adopted. The ancient book recorded: “Baekje and Goguryeo. They all came from Buyeo." It is also said that“a lot of Chinese people came to Haedong during the riots of Qin and Han." Then, how could the ancestors of the Three Kingdoms not descendants of the Chinese ancient saints?”

@user-en8nh5gp3q

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-en9bu9ul7c ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ복사 붙이기에 재미들렸냐?

张昱《张光弼诗集》卷三《宫中词》： 宫衣新尚高丽样，方领过腰半臂载，连夜内家争借看，为曾着过御前来。" "궁중에서 새롭게 유행하는 것은 고려양이라네 방령에 짧은 허리, 반소매 궁중 여인들이 밤까지 이어져 구경하려 하네 이는 고려 여인이 황제 앞에 이 옷을 입고왔기 때문이라네" Translation: The new trend in the palace is Goryeo Style. Short-waist, short-sleeved court women in Bangryeong continue to watch until night. The Short-waist, short-sleeved clothes has nothing to do with Ming dynasty Hanfu, another evidence that Hanbok was influenced by Hanfu, because in Yuan dynasty Korean still wear Short-waist, short-sleeved clothes. [숙원잡기]《菽园杂记》：：“马尾裙始于朝鲜国，流入京师……于是无贵无贱，服者日盛。至成化末年，朝臣多服之者矣。阁老万公安冬夏不脱……。大臣不服者惟黎吏侍淳一人而已。此服妖也，弘治初始有禁例。” "마미군은 조선국(고려)에서 시작되어, 수도로 유입됬으며......귀천을 가리지 않고 복식이 날로 성했다. 성화말년에 이르러, 조정 신하들도 많이 입게 되었다. 각로 모두 공, 사, 겨울에도 여름에도 벗지 않았다.....이 복식은 요사하므로, 홍치 초시에 금지되었다." Translation: Woven horsetails skirt started in Chosun (Korea) and flowed into the capital... By the end of the torch, many court officials were also wearing them. All of the corners were not taken off in the winter or in the summer. In Ming dynasty, we wear马面裙 has no inner skirt, which is not puffy. 马尾裙, which is inner skirt that make outsider skirt puffy, we do not wear that in Ming dynasty. Even we wear inner skirt, it is not made of Woven horsetails and has nothing to do with korea. [만포필기], 《寓圃笔记》:"发裙之制，以马尾编成，系于衬衣之内。体肥者一裙，瘦削者或二三，使外衣之张，俨若一伞。", "치마를 넓히는 제도는, 말꼬리를 옷안에 엮어서 만든다. 몸을 비대하게 만든 하나의 치마로, 마른사람은 혹 두개 세개를 입는다, 옷을 바깥으로 넓게 퍼지게 만드는데 쓰는데, 우산과 같다."고 기록하고 있습니다. Translation: The system for widening the skirt is made by woven horsetails into clothes. It is a skirt that makes the body enlarged, and the skinny person wears two or three lumps, and it is used to spread the clothes widely outside, and it is like an umbrella." Are you kinding me, Hanfu in Ming dynasty do not use horsetails panty to enlarge the body, what we wear is 马面裙，not 马尾裙，马尾裙 made of woven horsetails is a kind of inner skirt. That is all 高丽 clothes mentioned in these material, after translation, we can see that it has nothing to do with Ming dynasty clothes. In turn, it proves that hanbok in Joseon Dynasty was heavily influenced by China because it is totally different from Goryeo style.

@user-il9oj7ov4b

3 жыл бұрын

but you south Korea is not 高丽, America founded your country, your country did not ever exist until 20th century.

@zh1600

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-il9oj7ov4b 여러개의 중국 응원해! 니가 말한 티베트의 독립과 free 홍콩은 정말 감동적이야. 나중에 문자로 대자보 운동을 계획해보자!

@KoSungJin

3 жыл бұрын

I think china people have inferioty complex about Korean culture. I definitely like korean drama and their attitude. I used to live China and Korea both. But China people have very rude attitude over other country people. Also Korea is more clean and people are very nice

@user-gz9uo5rg5e

3 жыл бұрын

나르시스트ZH 김치국 김치어 특유의 치치치치치 짜 짜 짜 짜 짜 습니다습니다습니다가장시끄럽네🐸🐸🐸🥬🥬💩💩💩🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮kimchi國 kimchi pop kimchi語kimchi man最惡🤮 dog of USA all culture copy from China Japan or USA 中國附屬國 漢字 秋夕 儒家文化 傳統建築 筷子🥢 本草綱目 中醫藥 飲食文化 漢字專用語 韓服 端午節 日曜日 12節氣 風水 太極旗🇰🇷（copy from 中國太極圖）等等等等⋯⋯⋯all copy from China

@user-gz9uo5rg5e

3 жыл бұрын

KoSungJin 김치국 김치어 특유의 치치치치치 짜 짜 짜 짜 짜 습니다습니다습니다가장시끄럽네🐸🐸🐸🥬🥬💩💩💩🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮kimchi國 kimchi pop kimchi語kimchi man最惡🤮 dog of USA all culture copy from China Japan or USA 中國附屬國 漢字 秋夕 儒家文化 傳統建築 筷子🥢 本草綱目 中醫藥 飲食文化 漢字專用語 韓服 端午節 日曜日 12節氣 風水 太極旗🇰🇷（copy from 中國太極圖）等等等等⋯⋯⋯all copy from China

很多时候历史是不容易让人接受的，只需要对比两国的地理位置和当时的国力强弱就很容易理解

@Abys-Album

2 жыл бұрын

몽골 만주 거란 선비 흉노 족 말이어 ?

@Abys-Album

2 жыл бұрын

Mongols, Manchus, Khitan, Turks, Xiongnu? haha

@Abys-Album

2 жыл бұрын

땅 크고 인구 많아서 고구려에 박살 나고 일본에 영토 점령 당했냐 ?

@Abys-Album

2 жыл бұрын

The land was large and populated, so was it destroyed by Goguryeo and occupied by Japan?

@user-sk2cf3pz3m

2 жыл бұрын

@@Abys-Album Where are they now?

Now, some Koreans are starting to use Chinese culture in their dramas and claiming that it's Korean culture without any basis. Honestly, this looks silly and nondescript.

@user-rk1uc6xr1k

Жыл бұрын

说中国人偷韩国文化的，先看看你家韩国历史书用的哪国文字吧😅😅

@JENNYLEEWORLD

Жыл бұрын

Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.,,,,...,

@random_guy1084

Жыл бұрын

@@user-rk1uc6xr1k *The world view vs Chinese view* When the people say "this culture is mine because it looks like Tang culture, that culture is mine because it looks like Ming culture, etc” while watching K-dramas without paying a single penny, the world people and C people have different views: 1. The world view: These people are shameless stealers. They are accusing the victims as stealers even during they are stealing. C copy and steal others’ properties every day without feeling shame and inflict lots of loss to the owners, but they cannot bear the slightest when they falsely feel someone took theirs. 2. C people view: every good thing and envious things are ours if we can somehow find similarity with our ancient things. We have a magic key (ancient history books). If something similar is mentioned in our ancient books, we originated it because our books are the oldest.

@JENNYLEEWORLD

Жыл бұрын

@@random_guy1084 Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.,

请部分网友尊重历史。韩国人不要空口编造历史了。

@hwangseee294

3 жыл бұрын

韩国人不是对历史胡编乱造的，而是对少数中国人要夺走韩国的历史感到恼火的。那样说真叫人遗憾 한국인은 역사에대해 날조하는것이 아니라 소수의 중국인이 한국의 역사를 빼앗아하려는것에 화가난것이다.말을 그렇게 하다니 섭섭하다

@user-cs7zo1zj4f

3 жыл бұрын

hwang se Chinese are also annoyed at the Korean theft of Chinese culture.we dont say hanbok is hanfu.Why do Koreans come to Hanfu videos and say it's Hanbok？ur han is korean nationality.our han means han nationality which is the main ethnic groups in China.Why korean want to steal our Hanfu？

@amosxu3494

3 жыл бұрын

@@hwangseee294 The slave of three masters , a tributary state for thousands of years. South Korea is three state's slaves of China(BC87s-AD1895s), Japan(AD1896s-AD1945s) and The US(AD1950s-Now) // The tragedy of the Korean Peninsula is his location， When China was strong, Korea became a vassal state of CN. When Japan was strong, Korea became a vassal state of JP too. When The US is NO.1, Korea has also been a vassal state of USA until now. So China and The US will not agree to the reunification of North and South Korea forever. // The US army committed murder, rape and robbery on the mainland of South Korea, but the South Korean government did not control it, which shows that S.Korea is a slave country of the United States

@amosxu3494

3 жыл бұрын

@@hwangseee294 As a vassal state for thousands of years, so their people are very self-abased. They steal all the traditional culture and food from China ，then claim it as theirs. // The ancient S.Korean royals and aristocrats spoke/wrote Chinese, while the common people spoke/wrote Korean. that is why all the ancient S.Korean books are written in Chinese and the Republic of S.Korean first constitution was written in Chinese! // Most of S.Korean young people can't read the ancient books written in Chinese，so they learn historical nihilism and think everything from China were made in S.Korea.

@user-pw1cp3hq8k

3 жыл бұрын

@@hwangseee294 放屁，做賊喊捉賊，噁心

早就说了 高丽近代都是学习大明的技术文化和语言的 居然还有人不知道

@TeddyLikesGame

3 жыл бұрын

現在的韓國與高句麗沒有半毛錢關係。他們已經都搞不清自己的祖先是誰了，還老說高句麗，真得是可悲到不能認祖歸宗。之後建立的高麗，第一任皇帝是王建，雖然出生在朝鮮半島，卻是個高句麗和漢人的後代。王建自認是淮河流域的漢人後裔。第二個皇帝，王建的兒子還是公認的中國血統，李氏王朝的太祖李成桂，是女真族，他推翻高麗後，被明朝封為朝鮮王。我都覺得韓國是中國人建的了⋯⋯

@lidai6387

3 жыл бұрын

@@TeddyLikesGame 他们还认为高句丽是他们的祖先哈哈哈，我看文献记载，韩国人祖先是三韩人，高句丽把他们打的落花流水的，现在居然认贼作父

@TeddyLikesGame

3 жыл бұрын

@@lidai6387 哈哈哈 对的 他们只是觉得谁在他们家附近住过，那就是他们祖先。 到处认亲戚这脸皮也没谁了

@denglinzhiniao

3 жыл бұрын

@@TeddyLikesGame 我就说了是日本人统治朝鲜半岛历史太短，否则韩国人现在绝对要去认日本祖宗。

@TeddyLikesGame

3 жыл бұрын

@@denglinzhiniao 是的！應該再統治個一兩百年。還好，日本人留下了一堆露乳裝的照片，他們想抵賴也不行。我們建立秦朝封建國家的時候，他們才建立第一個奴隸制國家。這落後了不知幾千年,還想著要去領導中原文化。太可笑了。

Both Manchurian and Korean brides wore "bumpits" like what Amidala used in "Attack of the Clone" when she entered a Chancelor's office on Coruscant or Trantor so interestingly from 1938 to today in of Wonsan such a region has aerospace factories of braided composite fuselage aerospace frames.

In South Korea's eyes, all the universe belongs to one part of the nation. It is customary for the Chinese to call South Korea "the country manipulating the universe".

@jeepoon1083

2 жыл бұрын

Xizinping ping ping ping

@666Yourkarma

Жыл бұрын

Hanfu is from Korea Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China Hanfu is from Korea wen Korea ruled China before Ming dynasty we influenced in China 1500years ago Koreans are from Mongolian our culture and Dna is very different with China. Just that’s science and truth. China kills and buried and burned ur owned culture Protect ur original culture Koreans and all world liked ur origin Not copy from others Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China Hanfu prove our history letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture Not from China We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others? Hanfu has existed in Ming Dynasty But Text of Hanfu has been created just 20years ago You guys haven’t wore thousands years and even 10years ago. You suddenly started wear hanfu just in 10years You guys insist Hanfu is origin. Korea has been Manchuria before ming dynasty Hanbok has been for a long time in Korea Youguys insist Ours r from Korea We don’t say Kimono is from Korea even though we have wore Kimono for along time No one says kimono is Korean cloth China is greedy China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others? China will be broken Chinese will admit their greedy fault and Tibet and Hongkong and Taiwan will be happy and free China will be heaven when they will be broken completely

@666Yourkarma

Жыл бұрын

China thinks Chinese created universe

@666Yourkarma

Жыл бұрын

China needs to break all lie Lier of kingdom that CHINA

문화 대혁명때 다 불타 없어진 역사밖에 없는 것들이 역사를 파고드ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

@sch7722

3 жыл бұрын

그니까욬ㅋㅋㅋ 뭐 내세울것도 없으니 뺏어오자라는 심보 ㅋㅋㅋ

@R.Nye.1122

3 жыл бұрын

ㄹㅇ 자기거 다 부숴버리고 뭐 하나 밀어볼려하니 없으니깐 남의거 도적질하는중 ㅋㅋ

@R.Nye.1122

3 жыл бұрын

@@jasmo961 속국이던때는 느그 한족나라가 아니라 몽골족 나라라고 ㅋㅋ

@user-ef4ic6xq8x

3 жыл бұрын

@@jasmo961 진짜 역사 1도 모르네 무식이 죄는 아니지만 자랑할 것도 아니다.

@user-wr5fk4hw5i

3 жыл бұрын

@@jasmo961 홍길동이냐 여기저기 뿅뿅 복붙하고 다니게ㅋㅋㅋ

清朝的文化也很美旗袍也很美汉服也很美，都是中国文化，为什么南朝鲜人只说中国人为什么明明有旗袍和辫子头但是偏要吹汉服，难道南朝鲜人学的历史里中国只有清朝一个朝代吗 没文化真的好可怕哦，支持十音！

@kuangyin799

3 жыл бұрын

是啊，每個族群都有自己的傳統服飾，而且都很有特點呢。

@user-wb4td7sb9j

3 жыл бұрын

에휴 ㅉ

@kensai2119

3 жыл бұрын

因为朝鲜半岛的历史都是用汉语文书写的；现在的朝鲜和韩国已经放弃了汉字教育，当然也就无人知晓真正的历史了！

@user-ic6ju9jm8j

3 жыл бұрын

@냥냥펀치 China has many dynasties, not only Han or Qing.

@xitongdou9369

3 жыл бұрын

@냥냥펀치 China is not the union of Han, it’s a union of 56 cultures, including Han. Qing is only one part of Chinese history, ruled by Mongolian and Manchu. The part of culture that Koreans had been using as reference is Ming, ruled by Han. Chinese culture is not as simple as Korean’s since they have a much more profound history and capacious land. By the way, you could purchase history books at good price on taobao when shopping for hair bands made in Zhejiang. Do not do plastic surgery on your brain, it’s fetal and ridiculous.

你只是說出實話 請不必害怕 👍

@jameshenrysmith

Жыл бұрын

Korean hamburger, lol!

Historically, without the help of the Ming Dynasty, the poor North Korea may have been completely ruled by Japan, don't you Korea never learn history? Commenting on an ancient civilization with a history of more than 5,000 years - China?

@random_guy1084

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, this was the only time when Han Chinese (Ming) helped us from foreign invasion. First, even without the help of Ming, Joseon would’ve defeated J eventually. K people are totally different from J and C people. J and C people just follow the new rulers when their rulers change. This was the history and gene of J people throughout history. Wars have been between the rulers (Samurai), and ordinary people just followed the rulers, and they think it’s the right way for 和(harmony). Even some J people openly say in the interview that they don’t care if their ruler is changed by K or C, they just follow. C people are also very similar to J in this regard. However, K people are totally different. Even though the King run away, people fight forever for the country. That was the miscalculation of J invaders at 1592 AD. They thought that if the Joseon royal palace was captured, the residents would follow them like J people. Second, the reason why J invaded Korea(Joseon) in 1592 AD was that Joseon refused J request to give the way to invade Ming. Thus, Han C must thank K people. If we gave the way, surely Han C would’ve been ruled by J because J were much more organized and bigger population than other northern rulers (Mongols, Manchus, etc) in China. Traditionally, Han C have been so weak in wars despite huge population. The main reason was they lack 團結力(단결력) unlike Koreans, and they just follow the new rulers like Japanese.

@user-wr6yq6vz2b

2 жыл бұрын

@@random_guy1084 hahaha gibberish

@user-wr6yq6vz2b

2 жыл бұрын

@@random_guy1084 When Korea was about to destroy the country, it sent people to seek help from the Ming Dynasty, and the emperor of the Ming Dynasty sent people to help.

@user-wr6yq6vz2b

2 жыл бұрын

@@random_guy1084 让路……哈哈好笑。 日本的野心是在进攻大明之前摧毁朝鲜。Make way... lol funny. Japan's ambition is to destroy the North Korea before attacking Ming.

@random_guy1084

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-wr6yq6vz2b I’ll tell you big secret why C is very weak in soccer. It’s because they lack 團結力(단결력) as I told you above. Soccer requires big team work and 團結力(단결력). It’s their blood made over thousands of years, so very difficult to change it. I recommend C focus only on individual sports. Focusing on what they can do well is better than wasting lots of money.

신기하지? 숫자로 안밀리니까 ㅋㅋ 우리나라 롤로 달연된 멘탈과 특유의 키보드워리어들이 존제하는 나라다.ㅋㅋ 우리가 안모여서 못이긴거지 모이면 다 ㅈ되는거야^^

@cafemoca200

3 жыл бұрын

@Josephina Hannafin ㅋㅋㅋ핑계없는 무덤 없다죠 ㅋㅋ

@user-ir6dd1qd7w

3 жыл бұрын

작년에 중국 가봤는데 vpn 키면 바로 유튜브 켜짐

@user-qe5sr4xi6p

3 жыл бұрын

I want to drop an atomic bomb in Beijing and Shanghai.❤❤

@vitaminz7680

3 жыл бұрын

@Josephina Hannafin ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 목숨걸고 정부에 저항하면서 까지 우회로 인터넷이나 하면는 주제에 참들 웃겨요 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그렇게 정부에 충성이면 똑바로 처신들이나 할 것이지 ㅠ.ㅠ ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

@medic1038

3 жыл бұрын

@Josephina Hannafin 님의 계정에 X를 눌러 조의를 표하겠습니다

提到韩国有的而中国没有的，我第一个想到的是美国大兵，这个确实是韩国的一个特色，韩国人可以发展一下“美国驻军文化”，树立自己的文化自信🤣😂

@padeng555

3 жыл бұрын

Its very stupid for China to say hanbok and kimchi are Chinese all of sudden in 2020 while China had their mouth shut for past centuries. 🤣🤣 Maybe they got jealous cuz of K culture and K Pop being famous

@magnoliachao9822

3 жыл бұрын

@@padeng555 古代模仿中国 现代照搬欧美, 这可能就是你们的南韩传统吧 Ancient imitation of China modern copy of Europe and the United States, this may be your South Korean tradition

@padeng555

3 жыл бұрын

@san jack so you are saying that China always steal others culture right? Agree 👍 👍

@user-hq5fx6wf9v

3 жыл бұрын

@san jack 불쌍한 중국은 자기의 문화가 없어 남에 문화를 훔치려 합니다!

@ddong9643

3 жыл бұрын

露奶装中国也没有啊。绝对的韩国特色。

1. In Suseo, there is also a record that "Both Silla and Baekje regarded Japan as a great country, but they were also revered because there were many precious items, and they always traveled back and forth through envoys." However, it is an excessive leap to interpret that Japan dominated the southern part of the Korean Peninsula only with the above sentence. In other words, "Silla and Baekje regarded Japan as a big country, but there were many treasures and envied it. In summary, it is just that Silla and Baekje regarded Japan as a big country due to its many treasures, but it is far from serving it as a subordinate relationship. In addition, that book clearly limits the concept of Wa. Above all, it is clearly stated that only the east side of Juksaguk(竹斯國) is in line with Wa in the Suseo 수서(隋書) 왜국전(倭國傳) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 三十餘國(서른여 나라가 있는데) 皆自稱王(우두머리들마다 자신을 임금이라고 일컫는다.) 夷人不知里數(오랑캐들(왜)은 거리를 잴 때 리(里)를 쓰는 법은 모르고) 但計以日(다만 걸린 날수로만 셈할 뿐이다.) There is a thirty-year-old country, and each leader calls himself a king. 漆皮為甲(가죽을 칠하여 갑옷을 만들고) 骨為矢鏑(뼈를 갈아 화살촉을 만든다.) 雖有兵(비록 군대가 있지만) 無征戰(이웃나라를 빼앗기 위한 싸움은 벌이지 않는다.) They painted leather to make armor and grind bones to make arrowheads There is no fight to take away neighboring countries, even though there is an army. 沒水捕魚。(물속에 들어가 고기를 잡는다.) 無文字(글자는 없고)、唯刻木結繩。(나무에 금을 새기거나 새끼줄을 묶어 기록할 뿐이다.) 敬佛法(불교를 높이 받들어)、於百濟求得佛經(백제에서 불경(佛經)을 구하니)、始有文字。(비로소 글자를 알게 되었다.) 知卜筮(점칠 줄 알고)、尤信巫覡。(무당과 박수를 굳게 믿는다.) They Go into the water and catch fish.There are no letters, but only engraving or tying a rope on a tree to record. Buddhist scriptures were obtained from Baekje. Knowing how to predict, they strongly believe in shamans and fortune teller. 俗無盤俎(민가에는 쟁반과 도마가 없는 대신) 藉以檞葉(겨우살이 이파리를 음식 밑에 깐다.) 食用手餔之(음식은 손으로 집어 먹는다.) Instead of having no tray or cutting board in a private house, they put a leaf under the food. They eat food with using hand. 人庶多跣足(백성은 대부분 맨발로 다닌다.) Most of the people walking around barefoot. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese history books clearly explain that ancient Japanese most of the people live barefoot, use bone arrowheads, and have no text messages until they learn from Baekje, use leaves instead of bowls, and eat food by hand. In other words, these specific descriptions can be seen as much more reliable than the abstract phrase, "Both Silla and Baekje regarded wa as a great country," but the literature written through experiences experienced by 문림랑(文林郞), 배세청(裵世淸) Munlimrang and Bae Se-cheong directly from the Sui Dynasty reflects the reality of Japan at the time. Therefore, it is contradictory to anyone to interpret that both Silla and Baekje regarded and served Japan as a large country because there were many rare items

@user-kx5xc8nd4b

Жыл бұрын

你哪里都有，除了复制黏贴还会啥，韩国继承中国的很多文化不但不感恩还说是中国偷韩国的笑死人，好像在说韩国人是父母继承子女一样的道理。韩国那小肚鸡肠的心思，如果说到朝鲜继承古朝鲜的文化也是北朝鲜，而不是跟着美国屁股后面的韩国。古朝鲜在明朝是中国的附属国，你去读读历史再来发言吧，丢脸，除了争就是炒，韩国人没点别的本事吗

@nationfighting3929

Жыл бұрын

Sttttttttttling is a long tradition of han Chinese people. Tibet and Uighur people should be independent. Inner Mongolians should be Mongolians, too. The Chinese have man1pxxxxxed ancient history to unify the surrounding ethnic minorities into Han Chinese over and overagain. The Chinese have gaslighted other peoples as unciv111zed and claimed their culture to be the best. However, Taoism(including oracle bone, bagua,yin yang theory), rituals, territorial expansion, and golden culture of the ancient Chinese are all derived from other northern peoples. The Chinese st01e the culture of northern Asian people and manixxxxxted it to be founded by the Han Chinese. Many Chinese claim that ancient Chinese records are completely consistent with real history.But the ancestors of the Han Chinese in China were farmers in southern China and st01e the history and culture of the people of northern Asia for thousands of years. eventually China's Sin0centrism has exactly the same goal as current Chinese politics. Now China has been planning to divide the Korean Peninsula and turn North Korea into China. thfffffft of han nationalism is the most important element of Chinese culture.

@aab7472

Жыл бұрын

@@nationfighting3929 Is Gauls the last people in France? Why don't you question France? Listen to me, the Han people started with the Yellow River and Yangtze River, and then began ethnic integration for 5000 years. Between them, the Han people accounted for 90% of the time, and most of the 5000 year history was also ruled by the Han people. It's really ridiculous. You take 5% of the time to start saying that the Han people have no rights? Why are Koreans so cheap? Because you have never won and deceived yourself into compiling history, why did your industry lose and start a deficit? Because you have never faced reality, I am convinced that Japan, South Korea, is not a nation to be afraid of. Listen, your ignorance has offended the Chinese elites and young people, and these are the future of China.

Korea got lots of influence from Ming Dynasties. Ming Dynasty helped Korean fight against Japanese invasion. Why the hate😭

@666Yourkarma

2 жыл бұрын

China steals from us too much

@666Yourkarma

2 жыл бұрын

Korea culture is from India and Hanbok is from Scythian and Mongolian Not from china We thx to Mongolian

@666Yourkarma

2 жыл бұрын

Ming dynasty is influenced by Korea

@noobwow2009

2 жыл бұрын

@@666Yourkarma Then why you guys use Chinese characters? I bet you can’t distinguish 韓 and 漢。 you simply call it Han. And the heck Korean is related to India? Korean sail to India thousand years ago?

@666Yourkarma

2 жыл бұрын

@@noobwow2009 Korea was reached out Manchuria because We are Mongolian Korean kings have married with Indian princess who my grandmother and grandfather 2000years ago

문화재 다 불태우던 놈들이 이러는것도 웃김 ㅋㅋㅋ 치파오는 어따 내팽겨치고 ㅋㅋㅋ

@user-cp2cj3sj4r

3 жыл бұрын

제 채널에 한푸부흥운동 영상 있음, 와서 한번 봐주십쇼

@EDward-yk6es

3 жыл бұрын

korean is influenced by Chinese culture at all.

@user-eh1wd8hz9z

3 жыл бұрын

@@EDward-yk6es so what??

@user-eh1wd8hz9z

3 жыл бұрын

@@EDward-yk6es and hanbok is korean^^

@user-od7rd1hi3z

3 жыл бұрын

@@EDward-yk6es FreeHongkong 🇭🇰🇭🇰🇭🇰

韩国人如果想反驳回击的话起码要先自己去翻翻文献资料，搜集一下文案有理有据才叫辩论吧，什么都不愿意做，只会在网上顾左右而言他扯东扯西，黏贴复制一样的评论，原来这就是韩国人跟别人争辩的方式吗？怪不得网上流行你们最多的东西就是骂人脏话跟低级段子，看了觉得真可怜。

@SNIPER-XYZ

3 жыл бұрын

Hanbok is a symbol of democratization in Korea. I support the Chinese people's desire for democratization through Hanbok. Let's wear hanbok and drive out the Communist Party.

@icechoi35

3 жыл бұрын

哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈你真的好搞笑

@liugwen8425

3 жыл бұрын

@@SNIPER-XYZ Do you know your remarks look silly? I don’t think South Korea is as democratic as the United States and South Korea is a bad place

@SNIPER-XYZ

3 жыл бұрын

@@liugwen8425 China can also be democratized. Cheer up! I hope Korean hanbok will affect China's democratization.

@user-rn6rz3fx2d

3 жыл бұрын

🤣

i would like to see the stats on how many were black listed. lol

必须支持一波～节目非常的棒

@user-cg8nc8bl3w

2 жыл бұрын

是的，思路清晰明確，有理有據。

@user-oo2kh8ky9f

9 күн бұрын

아아 한심해~~ㅋㅋ

근데 중국인 유투브 왜함?

@jayjay-ci8ol

3 жыл бұрын

중국이 민주화운동을 추진하려나봅니다 우리 그들을 응원해요

@soominpark3093

3 жыл бұрын

외국사는 중국인인데 정부가 돈주는듯 중국역사 알리라고

@nififine9511

3 жыл бұрын

@@smmin6083 你们所谓的民主就是当人民被财阀压在脚下的时候，政府连屁都不敢放一个，却忙着向美国摇尾巴嘛？也是，毕竟是韩国人自己愿意这样，应该也算是民主。

@beautyhello5175

3 жыл бұрын

@@smmin6083 韩国被美国殖民

@jayjay-ci8ol

3 жыл бұрын

@@nififine9511 그니까 중국인들이 민주주의를 보여달라니까?! 한국 보다 잘하는지 당장 중국의 민주주의 모습을 보여줘!

It's weird to see people confuse Hanbok and Hanfu with each other, because they look completely different. Wait oh damn didn't expect the like-dislike ratio to be nearly tied

@cherryzhang2931

3 жыл бұрын

@정도영 明朝是韩国的宗主国，甚至李氏朝鲜的名字也是明朝的皇帝给的，他们以接受明朝的赐服为荣，接受大明正统的华夏服饰文化是一件非常值得炫耀的事情。 朝鲜人崔溥曾说：“盖我朝鲜地虽海外，衣冠文物悉同中国……” 所以，韩国的传统服饰受到明朝的影响很深。 来自明朝的文化在韩国一直传承到现在，笠帽和翼善冠也经常在电视剧中出现。 from 知乎 please study first bfor u comment here 🤡

@cherryzhang2931

3 жыл бұрын

@정도영 wdym by so different? Did u see and learn all of the hanfu design?? Did u know how many kinds there are? Dont judge it when u dont even know🤷‍♀️🤡 小丑竟是你自己

@cherryzhang2931

3 жыл бұрын

@정도영 o do u think that Korea really owned china bfor? Ha ha ha u can go search in google or libraries first

@user-ie6wl1km7z

3 жыл бұрын

@정도영 Come on, you don't really think the history records in China were all written by the current “china government" do you. Whatever hatred you have on CPC, Chinese history of one dynasty was recorded by the history official from the descending dynasty. The integrity of these records is unquestionable, or at least could not be questioned by an ignorant like you. Read more kid.

@user-ph2nr1pv7w

3 жыл бұрын

China is one of the oldest civilizations in the world. There r 4 in total, China Babylon Egypt and India, how come Korea is not included?🙂

Official clothes:chinese Normal people: korean Goryeoyang: the first korean wave in clothes During the period chinese clothes influenced by korean style so their king banned it officially because he wanted to keep their style And also actually koreans are influenced a lit from nothern riding tribe (not only mongol but similars) Now they became one china. So definition is diffrent when chinese says and korean says And obviously we influnced each other Dont wear westernized clothes then

有文化和素质的中韩两国人民，其实是非常友好的。我的几个韩国同学曾经就说，他们非常清楚如今传统韩服的前身底色是“大明赐服“，但随着时间的流逝，渐渐地融入了古朝鲜的部分特色。当然我说的这部分韩国人是极少数，大部分韩国人罔顾事实，被韩国狭隘的历史教育洗脑，居然反过来说是大明学习了李氏朝鲜的服饰，不然你觉得所有的华人为什么生气？中国怎么不去说和服是自己的？因为日本人至少在这一点上大方承认，和服脱胎于中国吴服，但后来自成体系，当得上是日本文化。就好比日本人说，大唐是去日本学了文化，不可笑吗？景福宫按照史料记载，李氏王朝得到大明的钦定才有资格开建，而且规格形制仅仅是大明郡王级别，不承认有用吗？从来就是中国的附属国，直到大清衰弱了才独立出去，不承认有用吗？

중국인들은 댓글을 지우지 않으면 상대가 안되나 보네? 드루와 드루와 ㅋㅋㅋ

@zouminni7324

3 жыл бұрын

가소 지극히, 대단한 한국인, 억지로 까만 것을 하얗게 말하였다.

@mastashin841

3 жыл бұрын

@@zouminni7324 dont cry chinese , a poor nation without freedom but cheer up plz🙏

@easterlnera5856

3 жыл бұрын

@지나가던놈 真的会有人信vpn违法吗？😂😂🤔你随意

@easterlnera5856

3 жыл бұрын

@지나가던놈 另外翻译器换个好点的么么😂😂

@i3D

3 жыл бұрын

@지나가던놈 come on

오직 코로나만 중국의 것이다.

@user-tv2re2wy3m

3 жыл бұрын

ㅋㄱㅋㄱㅋㄱㅋㅋㅋㅋㄱㄱㄱㄱㄱㅋㅇㅈ

@user-vq8vh3nx2m

3 жыл бұрын

@하녕 ̆ 아ㅏㅏㅏ주 좋소

@user-pb3nu2qi8w

3 жыл бұрын

real

@user-jl1cu9bs8e

3 жыл бұрын

중국발 미세먼지도 추가요

@user-rh1gq8zg8x

3 жыл бұрын

@하녕 ̆ 어떻게 만든거지?

Some Chinese companies go abroad and pretend to be Korean companies. They put up signs with Korean writing and sell products as if they were Korean. Minigood, llahui, and mumuso are examples of these Chinese companies. They even use the word "Korea" on their overseas signboards, play KPop songs, and greet customers with "Welcome" in Korean. Despite not actually being Korean products, these companies sell their products as if they were. China has a reputation for copying.

@JENNYLEEWORLD

Жыл бұрын

Delusional angry confused jealous Chinese. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and Chinese invention originated from koreanic and Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese population were austronesian negritos. Yangtze river southern china Burma southeast Asia is Homeland of Chinese austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited only by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Han people and han dynasty was named after han river which is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.,.

@jameshenrysmith

Жыл бұрын

Korean hamburger, lol!

*Proposals for the prosperity of East Asia* J people here claims south K was ruled by J and north K was ruled by C at ancient times. They show their unrealistic wish to divide K (J occupy south and C occupy north). That’s why C also collaborate with J when it comes to ancient history. One example is C’s attempt to annex Goguryeo history and C blindly accept J’s fabricated ancient history of K. I’ll try to show that their collaboration is bound to fail, then I’ll try to propose the realistic way to strengthen their position in this region. *1. K and C origins:* At ancient times, K peninsula and Liao River were within the cultural sphere of Liao River (汎遼河文化圈) and C belonged to Yellow River culture. Liao River was inhabited by ancestors of K (Gojoseon, Buyeo) until 200 BC when Weiman and Han dynasty occupied Liaoxi (요서). Gojoseon crossed the Bohai sea and founded Mahan in 200 BC, and later Buyeo founded Goguryeo, Baekje, Silla. So, their northeast project cannot succeed merely by annexing Goguryeo history unless they annex Gojoseon and Buyeo history. C history books have never considered Gojoseon, Buyeo, Goguryeo, Baekje, Silla as part of C history. Thus, their attempt to change the 史觀(사관) formed through 3000 years of history is bound to fail. *2. Origin of J* *(1) Jomon period (14,000-300 BC):* There were only Jomon (D) in J archipelago. Jomon reached to the K peninsula first at Paleolithic period then O1b2 arrived to K peninsula. We can guess that arrival of O1b2 was the reason why Jomon in K peninsula retreated to the J archipelago and southern coastal regions of K peninsula. *(2) Yayoi period (300BC ~ 300AD):* There was big Yayoi (O1b2) migration from southern K peninsula to J during this period. It was a time when Gojoseon (O2) from Liaoxi (요서) migrated to K peninsula and founded Samhan. Authentic history books affirm it: [三國志], “With every dawn, many (Gojoseon) refugees flowed into Mahan's homeland, and Mahan was founded". [後漢書], “King Jun of Joseon(Gojoseon) was defeated by Weiman, and led the remaining thousands of people through the (Bohai) sea, attacked Mahan, defeated Mahan, and established himself as the king of Han(韓).” We can guess these events were the reason why many K peninsula natives (Yayoi, O1b2) migrated to J at that time. During this period, the Yayoi introduced advanced rice farming techniques to Japan. Many J people, who don’t want to accept that K peninsula people introduced this advanced technique, try their best to prove O1b2 originated from Yangtze River, but O1b2 never inhabited the Yangtze during the entire prehistoric and Bronze Age. Not a single bone with O1b2 has been found in the Yangtze River. At that time, most people of the Yangtze River were O1a, and the proportion of O1a among Koreans and Japanese is negligible. *(3) Kofun period (300AD ~ 538AD):* Kofun people had totally different genes than people of Jomon and Yayoi periods based on gene analysis. The excavated eight bones of Gaya people had exactly the same genes as Kofun people. Based on these facts, even children can confidently say that Gaya people moved to J archipelago and replaced the existing Jomon and Yayoi people. Historians all over the world know that the J people are never allowed to excavate Kofun for fear that relics of Gaya and Baekje would come out. This was the time when Gaya was under big pressure by Three Kingoms of Korea (Baekje, Silla, Goguryeo) which were founded by Buyeo migrants (O2) from Liao River. J people don’t want to accept this fact, so they insist that J occupied and ruled Gaya. However, based on gene analysis, it must be the opposite. Based on archeology, an enormous amount of Gaya relics were found throughout the J archipelago, but J relics are rarely found on the K Peninsula. Gaya had advanced iron technology while J still used stone and wood at that time. Gaya introduced 神道(신토) to J. *(4) Asuka period (538AD ~ 710AD):* Baekje had close relationship with J during this period. When Baekje was destroyed by Silla in 660 AD, many Baekje people (O2 + O1b2) migrated to J with advanced cultures and technologies and made enormous contribution to form J’s first ancient nation and Asuka culture. Baekje introduced Buddhism to J. Summary: In J archipelago, Jomon (D) arrived first, then Yayoi (O1b2) arrived next, then Gaya (O1b2 + D) arrived next, then Baekje migrants (O2 + O1b2) arrived next. All of them came from K peninsula. That’s why modern J = D (Jomon, 33%) + O1b2 (K peninsula, 32%) + O2 (Liao River, 19%). The first comers (D) have highest proportion (33%), then the next comers (O1b2) have 32%, then the last comers (O2) have 19%. *Thus, we can conclude that the history of J is the history of K peninsula people who were pushed out of the power struggle on the K Peninsula.* The ridiculous J people here try to claim legitimacy on K peninsula. K has much more Yayoi blood (O1b2) and Liao River blood (O2) than J, and K were descendants of winners in K peninsula while J were descendants of the people who were driven out of K peninsula to J archipelago. Thus, K are true descendants of Pan Liao River Culture (汎遼河文化圈). If J don’t want to accept the truth, I wish J people keep believing they’re descendants of ancient Jomon in J archipelago and just stay there permanently. In east Asia, the country that draws K to its side can have great regional hegemony. The current strategy of C would never work. Northeast and culture project will be considered as a kind of invasion, and will further separate K away from them and K will be more united and seek a closer alliance with the West. To win K to their side, they need completely different approach. C need to frankly admit K (Gojoseon, Buyeo) were in Liaoxi (孤竹, 朝陽, etc) until 200 BC, and start to collaborate in studying ancient history, and support unification of K. Historically, Han C absorbed northerners by inducing them into mainland C rather than invading or separating them. Now C is rising, so they need to have confidence and take risk to gain big thing. For J to win K to their side, they need to sincerely apologize for the past, and admit they originated from K rather than claiming leadership in this region. However, it’s not going to happen in near future because J are very rigid, conservative and have complex against K. Japan will continue to hope for a second war between South and North K.

@syuzobitoh

4 ай бұрын

inferiority complex create a wonderful fantasy 😂😂😂 so scary😂

朝鲜人崔溥曾说：“盖我朝鲜地虽海外，衣冠文物悉同中国……”朝鲜文人徐居正亦曾作诗云：“明皇若问三韩事，衣冠文物上国同。”这里的“上国”指的自然就是中国。明王朝对李氏朝鲜也格外施恩，明太祖曾言：“九州之外，则每世一朝，所贡方物，表诚敬而已。惟高丽颇知礼乐，故令三年一贡。”

만화 일러스트 허락받고 올리는건가? 이거 조차 함부러 하는데 한복이 자기꺼래 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

@user-op5he1nm6f

3 жыл бұрын

어우 그러게요ㅠㅠㅠ 화딱지 나네요 Now i will tell the truth. The name of Hanfu has been established since 2001. Also, Hanfu is clothing that started from following Goryeo's clothing. READ 지정 이래 궁중의 급사와 사령은 태반이 고려의 여인이었다. 自至正以來, 宮中給事使令, 大半爲高麗女. Since the designation, the placenta has been a woman of Goryeo as the chief and commander of the court. 이 때문에 사방의 의복과 신발, 모자, 기물이 모두 고려를 따라 일시의 유행이 되었으니 어찌 우연하다 할 수 있는가? 以故, 四方衣服鞋帽器物, 皆依高麗樣子. 此關系一時風氣, 豈偶然哉. Because of this, clothes, shoes, hats, and articles all over the place became a temporary fashion following Goryeo. How can it be said that it is a coincidence? 권형(權衡), 경신외사(庚申外史) This is Chinese history. Read, and learn from your history. Don't make the lie

@chencyril7707

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-op5he1nm6f lmao since 2001? Nice one dude, you’re the one make my day

@xiaoxiao0825

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-op5he1nm6f She isn't lying! what you listed above was in Yuan dynasty... come on you Korean people don't even recognize Yuan dynasty as part of Chinese history and now you are showing me this? Some of the hanfu style has already been like the Ming hanfu 2 piece style since Song dynasty (from actual finding). Plus, the description you can find about 高丽样is completely unrelated to whatever she is showing in her video. It's half sleeve and square collar. So overall, we are in no way claiming 高丽样as hanfu, and don't say hanfu is hanbok... Now read your own history from various times: 1.According to the Samguk sagi삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀): “春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製”Translation: Gim Chunchu asked the Emperor of Tang to change the traditional cloth of Silla, the country shall follow the Chinese style)King Taejong Muyeol 무열왕／武烈王, Kim Chun-Chu, was the 29th ruler of Silla, one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea. In AD648, he asked the Tang Emperor to adopt the Chinese cloth style. 2.According to the “History of Goryeo” 고려사 (高麗史):” 復行洪武年號，襲大明衣冠,禁胡服”Translation: Joseon Dynasty shall adopt the era name of Hongwu of Ming, wear Ming costumes and headgears, ban Hu Dress. 3.Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記): “”真德王三年春正月，始服中朝衣冠“”Translation: In the third year of Jindeok, the first month of spring, people in Silla (South Korea) started to wear Chinese-style cloth and hats. Jindeok reigned as Queen of Silla, one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea, from AD 647 to AD 654. 4.Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty (Joseon Wangjo Sillok) 조선왕조실록. 朝鮮王朝實錄 : 高宗 36卷, 34年( 丁酉 / 대한 광무(光武) 1年) 9月 29日(阳历) 번째기사 " “我邦疆土, 係是漢、唐古地, 衣冠文物, 悉遵宋、明遺制, 接其統, 而襲其號, 無所不可"Translation: Korean King, Joseon Gojong조선고종 高宗 said: "The territories of Korea used to be ancient land of Han and Tang. Our costumes and relics conformed to Song. The kingdom system and structure adopted from Ming. It is rightful and legal to inherit the true name of Greater China and her culture. 5. Taejo of Goryeo고려 태조高麗 太祖 left 10 rules before he is gone, and these ten rules are known as Ten Rules 訓要十條 (훈요10조). The 4th section: 其四曰, 惟我東方, 舊慕唐風, 文物禮樂, 悉遵其制, 殊方異土, 人性各異, 不必苟同. 契丹是禽獸之國, 風俗不同, 言語亦異, 衣冠制度, 愼勿效焉.Translation: We, the East admire the customs of the Tang Dynasty, learn her rite and music, adopt her system and style. People from far land are different from us in terms of humanity, do not try to make them look similar in a subservient manner. The nature of Khitan (契丹) is brutal and bestial, we do not share the same value or language with them, so do not follow their system of attire.

@sch2nyy

3 жыл бұрын

@@chencyril7707 bro the word hanfu didnt even exist until you guys wanted to steal our culture

@JackLee-rt7wp

3 жыл бұрын

Listen to your ancestors, you pathetic creature, and read your history! Oops, sorry, they are written in Chinese, you can't understand. hahahahah 1.-According to the Samguk sagi삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀): “春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製” -Translation: Kim Chunchu asked the Emperor of Tang dynasty to change the traditional cloth of Silla to follow the Chinese Hanfu system. King Taejong Muyeol 무열왕／武烈王, Kim Chun-Chu, was the 29th ruler of Silla, one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea. In AD 648, he asked the Tang Emperor for permission to adopt the Chinese Hanfu style. 2.-Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記): “”真德王三年春正月，始服中朝衣冠“” -Translation: In the third year of Jindeok, the first month of spring, people in Silla (South Korea) started to wear Chinese Hanfu, including clothes and hats. Jindeok reigned as Queen of Silla, one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea, from AD 647 to AD 654. 3.-Wang Geon(왕건/王建)(877-943), the first King of the Goryeo Dynasty and the founder of Goryeo Yang(고려양/高麗樣) said in the "Ten Instructions" (훈요십조/訓要十條). -我東方舊慕唐風，文物禮樂，悉尊其制……契丹是禽獸之國，風俗不同，言語亦異，衣冠制度，慎勿效焉。 -Translation:All the systems of antiques/articles, rituals, instruments of our country are following the Tang dynasty (of course the costume system is included in)...Khitan is a country of animals, we are different from them in custom and language, and we should not learn the costume system from Khitan.

To Koreans who want to find a type of unique clothing to represent their nation, I suggest them not to look far into the history, but try to find clothing in the modern Korean history (like in the recent 200 years ish), such as modern Hanbok. Because the further you look into ancient Korean clothing history, the more you find it tangled with the ancient Chinese clothing history.

@random_guy1084

2 жыл бұрын

No. The further you go to the ancient times, you will notice the northern area has nothing to do with Han Chinese, and Han C got lots of cultural influence from the northerners who occupied and ruled them. C just absorbed their northern rulers culture, so you cannot say C originated northern culture. Korean culture originated from the north (Gojoseon, Buyeo). There were three types of northerners: Nomads (Donghu), Hunter-gathers (Sushen), Cultivators (Yemaek). Xianbei and Mongols were from Donghu. Manchus were from Sushen. Koreans are from Yemaek. These three groups had been living together at ancient times.

@Lu-yg5pr

2 жыл бұрын

@@random_guy1084 bruh go to history class

@asd-jy6pg

2 жыл бұрын

@@Lu-yg5pr The Chinese should learn history in a democratic country

@zddzll-

Жыл бұрын

可拉倒吧 中国14亿人口 汉族占12.8亿多 就是近代少数民族跟汉族都是不通婚的 文化习俗会有很多矛盾

@harrytu7504

11 ай бұрын

@@random_guy1084😂you are a joke, korean guy, read more history 😂

引用《菽园杂记》的人需要搞清楚马尾裙和马面裙完全是不同的。十音穿的是马面裙，有折轴且修工华丽精细。马尾裙是丫鬟穿的便宜朴实的服装。中国古代汉人雇佣购买朝鲜国做丫鬟穿马尾裙，很正常。

위대하신 마오쩌둥이 지옥에서 살아돌아오시겠어ㅠㅠ... 위대한 마오쩌둥의 정신을 더럽히지 말아죠 제발..

@iosj2001

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-yx2ep8xb1v 조선족이니? 짜져있어라~ 어디에도 속하지 못하는 것들 ㅉㅉ

@tomasjackson5224

3 жыл бұрын

你的金正恩领袖会用核弹统一朝鲜半岛😁😁😁

@iosj2001

3 жыл бұрын

@@tomasjackson5224 중국말라는 토마스 잭슨아, 미국 코쟁이 이름으로 유투브 한다고 공안에 신고하기 전에 짜져^^ 공안이라고 하면 벌벌 떠는 것들이 ㅉㅉ

@nashot

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-yx2ep8xb1v 근데 중국인은 생각이란것도 못하는 거 같은데 ㅋㅋ 진시황은 비응신마냥 분서갱유로 지식 다 태우고 모택동도 문화대혁명으로 문화 퇴보시켰잖아 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그래서 남의 것 다 배끼는거아님 ?? 국민성이잖아

@olivialee9525

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-yx2ep8xb1v ohhh you know 한? good job~ nice try ~ but your korean skill must be practice more! we cant understandTT and dont waste your time cuz if your goverment know you use KZread, YOU WILLBE KILLED WITH YOUR FAMILLY hoooooow dare you for your familly! AND keep them safty first before your are KILLED BY YOUR GOVERMENT♥️

受不了韩国这种邻居了，逻辑大国，甩不掉的口香糖，呕

@user-zi3sg7ql2l

3 жыл бұрын

真的 碰瓷中国 甩不掉最恶心 不然谁TM鸟它。叫嚣着把CNY给改掉 可是也不想想要不是中国这种大国过春节世界上谁会关心你一个小国过啥节…

@albertwong5031

3 жыл бұрын

古代韩国→中国附属国 고대 한국→ 중국의 속국 →🧎🏻🧎🏻‍♂️🙇🏻‍♂️ 现代韩国→美国殖民地 현대 한국→ 미국 식민지 →🦮🦮🦮 韩国人的历史是用汉字记载的 和宗主国争古代文化 就像说美国嘻哈模仿K-Pop一样可笑🥺 고대 한국인의 역사서는 그래도 한자로 쓴 것이다 .고대 문화를 놓고 대 군주와 경쟁하는 것은 미국 힙합이 K-Pop을 모방한다고 말하는 것만 큼 우스꽝 스럽습니다.🥺

@albertwong5031

3 жыл бұрын

韩国历史用汉字记载，景福宫和光化门上是汉字，韩国宪法原件用汉字写的，就是中国的文化属国。🥺🥺居然说爸爸遗传了自己的基因，真不像话。 한국 역사는 한자로 기재되어 있다. 경복궁과 광화문에는 모두 한자가 쓰여 있다. 한국 헌법 원본까지도 한자로 쓰여 있다. 고대 한국은 중국의 문화 속국이었다。🥺🥺아버지가 자기 유전자를 물려받았다고 하더군요，정말 말도 안 돼요

@sixiaoli5192

3 жыл бұрын

对韩国真的无语了，历史虚无（捏造历史），文化虚无（偷盗文化），精神虚无（韩国体育精神），恐怕连脑子也是虚无的吧

@albertwong5031

3 жыл бұрын

@설아 🪱🪱🪱🪱🪱？？ 中国人看不懂你们的蚯蚓文啊😂

I love hearing you speak Chinese! I’m an English speaker but I love hearing you going back and forth between the two.

@bmwjourdandunngoddess6024

Жыл бұрын

Hey Black Sista! You see all these other folks arguing? I thought our diaspora wars were bad. 😭

@jameshenrysmith

Жыл бұрын

@@bmwjourdandunngoddess6024 Obviously the food, drink etc. really comes from God.

(Answer to Kez) What you mentioned is only during 400 ~ 450AD when Goguryeo was strong. Baekje was strong in 4th century and Silla was strong in 6th century. If you look at authentic history book 後漢書 which was written 450AD, it describes each nations in K peninsula along with their peoples’ characteristics, *but not a single mention about 倭(왜) people in K peninsula. It means there were no J people in K peninsula.* Based on records, we can say J had some military influence during 400 ~ 450AD on southern part of K peninsula, but it’s only some military influence. *The cultural influence was always unidirectional from K peninsula to J archipelago.* Enormous amounts of Baekje, Gaya, Silla relics in J, but not vice versa at all. I’ve shown you drawings of 倭(왜) envoy in 梁職貢圖(양직공도) who didn’t even wear shoes (barefoot). According to another authentic record 隋書, J people didn’t wear shoes until 7th century. Several drawings show that J wore only upper clothes at that time (Sumo style). They didn’t have iron technology. So, I agree that J did good job in military with primitive technologies (stones and wood) without shoes and (lower) clothes during 390 ~ 450 AD.

@user-kx5xc8nd4b

Жыл бұрын

高句里和高丽不是一个好吧 韩国啥都没有所以喜欢争抢 自卑造就了自大

@Qiushishuo

Жыл бұрын

Goguryeo had not much connection with current Korean, OK?

@jameshenrysmith

Жыл бұрын

Obviously the food, drink etc. really comes from God.

@moss448

10 ай бұрын

高句丽是朝鲜死敌，然而现在你当祖宗😂🎉

한복이 그렇게도 갖고싶었어? 우쭈쭈

@user-pw2ey1nv2l

3 жыл бұрын

나는 중국인이고 한국을 아주 좋아합니다! ! ! 우리는 모두 일본의 침략을 당하고 있습니다. 저는 중국과 한국이 손을 잡고 일본을 물리쳐야한다고 생각합니다! !

@user-dq8bf7bw6r

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-pw2ey1nv2l 니네도 잘한거 없어 너희들 때문에 분단 됐잖아 너네나 일본이나 똑같은 ㄴ들이다

@user-pw2ey1nv2l

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-dq8bf7bw6r 일본은 동아시아에서 사라져야한다

@user-pw2ey1nv2l

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-zt5hv3gf1k 중국은 한국에게 매우 우호적입니다.

@cafemoca200

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-pw2ey1nv2l 중국 사람들은 그럴지 모르지만 중국 정부는 절대 아니야!. 걸핏하면 우리 바다에 들어와 생선 싹쓸이해가지~심지어 단속해경들 공격까지 하지~사드보복으로 한한령(개인적으로 이건 더 길어도 됀다고 봄!)내렸지. 이건 적대적 행동이라 볼수밖에

who dares to defend their own culture, is worhy to be respected

@6sinegohwan336

3 жыл бұрын

This video is more like dares to steal.

@6sinegohwan336

3 жыл бұрын

@@jiey7916 uno reverse card

@bydamaz3101

3 жыл бұрын

I’m an East Asian Studies student and I remember through most of the time until Japan colonized Korea, Korea was the affiliated country of ancient China. Another funny thing is that since Korean historical literature was mostly written in Chinese characters, the modern Korean people can’t read hanza at all. That’s probably why they refused to learn history. Sad for their bad attitudes.

@jiey7916

3 жыл бұрын

@@6sinegohwan336 if you are free and have a lot of time, you can study Chinese to read the ancient books (because the references of Law History Medical Science in South Korea are Chinese). Plz don’t waste time for uno, try your best to find the truth, okay?

@6sinegohwan336

3 жыл бұрын

@@jiey7916 ur saying like every culture existing in europe is Italian culture because they used latin characters for thousands of years. Thats just ridiculous man

The Korean flag was designed for them by Chinese Ma Jianzong in 1882, inspired by Chinese Tai Chi. Ma Jianzong was a participant, diplomat and founder of Fudan University in the Westernization Movement under the curtain of Li Hongzhang in Qing Dynasty. Arguably, the intellectual property of Korean flag belongs to Ma Jianzong and belongs to China.

@novaautoshows5902

2 жыл бұрын

No it's wrong fact

@user-dv5jx8oo6w

2 жыл бұрын

That's wrong. All you saying is a lie.