The green SeaQ is incredible. Perfect alternative to the mainstream diver's. And it is one of the exotic ones, which are "REAL" Divers :-) It fits and wears so comfortable. I like it very much ! Good review btw. ;-) as always....

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

You hit the nail on the head!

I think it's the perfect size. Looks great on you.

@WatchAdvisor

Ай бұрын

It is of course a perfect size… but end of the day tastes are different….

I think the size looks perfect on your wrist.

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

I would definitely wear the SeaQ

Incredibly well applied indices. This model would do better as a no-date

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

A no-date-version would be cool in fact!

This Watches are more than alternatives than the 1 Milion Manufacturer. Thanks for sharing Alexander.

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Of course they are, of course... Thanks for sharing!

Gooooooo swatch group. Rah rah rah!!!!🤩

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

thanks for sharing your passion with us!

Ooh, very nice, love the gold and the new large data.

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing!

Nice video and well presented as always. Thank you so much.

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Our pleasure!

This one is absolutely on my wish list - love the 39mm size and finally I can see the movement (which had the panorama datum) still want to have I

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Steel or gold?

@impexRQ

Жыл бұрын

@@WatchAdvisor gold as I would love to see the nonevent

Wonderfully detailed review, thank you. I love when people say 40 hrs is too little, yet love their Rolex which unless brand new has a 40 hr power reserve as well. If you aren’t wearing daily and don’t want to set it, get a winder. And finally get to see the wonderfully finished movement (in the gold at least, hopefully that moves to the rest of the 39.5 mm line).

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and commenting.... well said!

The vertical brushing on the flanks of the lugs and case profile is a very nice touch.

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Yes, and I didn't mention it... Thanks for sharing!

OMG YES!!! Although the panorama date is just next level… these are such good value!

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

What about the size of the SeaQ? Would you wear one?

@DigitalPRCourses

Жыл бұрын

@@WatchAdvisor I’ve tried both larger and smaller models on and decided the panorama date model is best for me. I can get away with the size (it’s at the upper limits tbh) but everything about it, especially the blue dial is just gorgeous.

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

@@DigitalPRCourses Thanks for sharing! Yes, that blue dial is simply magic… 🙌🏻

What a great watch 😍 would go for the red gold

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us!

One have to look far for more detailed videoes on watches then this. Kudos to you good sir!

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Love your comment! Thanks for sharing…

Fantastic review, this is how the review should be done ! Plastic pointer is already trade mark of your presentations 🤣

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Love your comment, thanks for sharing!

As always a great review! However I would rather go for the panorama date version with 100 hrs powerreserve Calibre 36-13 but (yes there is always a but) I prefer the blancpain fifty fathoms bathyscape ;) Thanks for the video.

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing! Blancpain videos are the next ones to come... I just filmed the new Bathyscaphe and Air Command...

I am very excited that the thinner profile SeaQ will start to receive a see through case back (I believe the steel models are close behind). GO has magnificent craftsmanship and I love seeing them displayed when you turn the watch over. I know Alexander that this is a tough and personal question for each person-but for you do you think the haptics on the SeaQ bezel action is better or similar to a submariner? If you have a different diver you think wins overall best haptics-which is for you? Thank you for showcasing such interesting watches!

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

The haptics of the SeaQ bezel is for sure better (in fact it is excellent!!) than the one of my "old" 1990s Submariner ... but I can't unfortunately confirm this with a new one, since I don't own one ...

@tbaker2610

Жыл бұрын

Glad to hear! Thank you for covering this exciting brand with an excellent product!

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

@@tbaker2610 you are very welcome 🙏🏻

I have a 17.5 cm wrist and would go for the small one ❤

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Why not! Tastes are different...

@hardy1416

Жыл бұрын

@@WatchAdvisor so you would go for Panorama, right? 😉

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Yes, definitely 👍🏼

Trying to hold of for GO to make blue dial/bezel in full gold. But this video is making it hard

@WatchAdvisor

11 ай бұрын

Thanks for sharing and please keep us posted…

Quick question for those of you interested : Is the Rose gold sea q with an exhibition case back for viewing purposes only - or (is it a cost saving measure to GO) because a solid (18kt rose gold) case back would clearly be more expensive than fitting in a sapphire crystal in it. Much less gold . So now its a great feature to see the movement. If it is such a great feature, why would the stainless 39.5 mm case not have the exhibition case back? -Because it would be more expensive to machine the solid stainless casebook and fit a crystal. So you would think - if it is not about money (WHICH I THINK IT IS) then, why would the buyers of the 39.5 18kt Rosegold NOT have their watches fitted with that little peripheral rotor weight made out of gold, instead of that chunk of stainless or tungsten or what ever. JUST an observation . and BTW I have full intention of purchasing the 39.5 Blue dial with the Diamond bezel/Blue sapphire (12 o'clock stone).

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Interesting thought experiment, thanks for sharing! You will never be able to please everyone in that case. Regardless of any argument about technology and/or money, everyone will prefer a different option. That's why manufacturers should always offer such watches with a closed case-back too.

@misterpsych3804

Жыл бұрын

@@WatchAdvisor that is a canned response, did you even process what I wrote?

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

I don’t think so… I’m just writing the things as they are…

@misterpsych3804

Жыл бұрын

@@WatchAdvisor what does that even mean?

@yellowwducky

Жыл бұрын

Interesting. That begs the question on the stainless. If they are finishing the movement in the stainless the same as in the red, is the crystal really any more money than the stainless back? Personally, I think they should have all been see through case backs from the get go.

That date change not appearing until 8 minutes after midnight is a bummer, especially at the price point.

@WatchAdvisor

2 ай бұрын

It is a question of movement design… this is quite an old calibre and it was one was conceived not to have an instantaneous date change… you have to built up (waste) energy with a snail and release it exactly at midnight… maybe the barrel simply doesn’t deliver enough energy…. Quality of mainsprings meanwhile has improved dramatically … so such exercises are easier to do …

Does anyone know what does the red gold weighs vs the stainless variant?

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

I don’t… Unless I mentioned it in the video, I don’t remember…

@yellowwducky

Жыл бұрын

@@WatchAdvisor Ah, you mentioned, 126 grams. Now I can get an idea of that weight vs my wife's other watch - in my opinion this is a perfect size 'big' sized watch for a woman.

If Glasshutte would release the first black dial model with white markers instead of the faux patina, I would buy the watch that day. The watch looks amazing here in the rose gold, and I’m hoping we get a black dial/white lume/ stainless case model with an exhibition case back in the future.

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us!

@AcmeRocket

Жыл бұрын

YES Please G.O.!! black dial ,steel, ,applied markers, See through case back!! maybe a 2023 novelty?

@Sandbag1300

Жыл бұрын

I thought about waiting for the black dial with white marker version but did not want to risk missing out on this style and the blue. So purchased the blue. After owning a GMT Master 2 and Oyster Perpetual Datejust I must say the finishing on the blue is on another higher level. The dial is visually interesting and vibrant. The blue has a personality that expresses itself in different lighting. In most lighting - indoors mostly - the blue looks more black than blue. On a time graph it keeps better time than the GMT Master 2 which is +/- 2 seconds/day. Best part is that this watch is super high quality and no one knows what it is until they look up close. I also like that the minute marks on the bezel allow me to tell time down to the second as accurately and almost as quickly as on a digital watch. This watch in it's different varieties will steal market share from Rolex and become very popular among the wealthy market segment.

👀

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Any thoughts?

I would buy the SEAQ if it had the same movement as the Panorama Date. Unfortunately the Panorama Date is far too big for small/medium wrists 😢

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

The small SeaQ with Panoramadate would be cool in fact…

@gregandark8571

Жыл бұрын

@@WatchAdvisor Agree!

@gregandark8571

Жыл бұрын

@@WatchAdvisor but maybe it should better to leave the smaller SeaQ without any kind of date complication to make it even prettier.After all we are not dealing with a real perpetual calendar,so why bother with a wheel date?

@yellowwducky

Жыл бұрын

I was in the shops the other day. The 41mm Tudor ceramic looked essentially the same size (to my eye) on the wrist as the SeaQ pano. Just my impression.

So, the gold has an exhibition case back . . . so they can use less gold , but still go for the typical steel-to-gold price mark-up. 🤣. Excuse my cynicism, it’s still a great watch

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

With a solid case back in gold the SeaQ would be much more expensive…

@adbraham

Жыл бұрын

The huge mark price mark-up born by the consumer when manufacturers produce gold variants has little to do with their associated costs: its marketing pure and simple, so for that reason I disagree with you. However please keep producing your excellent videos! @@WatchAdvisor

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

@@adbraham Of course I know that and therefore with a solid case back the watch would be more expensive … “solid” = more valuable appearance = higher price

@adbraham

Жыл бұрын

@@WatchAdvisor That’s not my point. The point I am making is that the increased price of a watch in gold over a watch in steel is far and away more than the increased cost of the material & tooling, plus profit on top. It’s all marketing. The watch is PRICED at what the manufacturer thinks the market will stand, so economising by saving gold on the case back increases their margin; just as Tudor have done with the gold BB58

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

@@adbraham Thanks for commenting again… But, Tthat’s exactly what I wrote above… 😉

I think the size is perfect for your wrist. Sorry!!

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Of course… it is a matter of taste and tastes are different… I prefer watches > 40 mm …

40 hr power reserve is just terrible and lazy. Lovely watch hugely let down by this. Would not purchase because of this.

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

Why? It is an automatic calibre... as long you wear the watch you will have no problem... and if you you lay it down for a while you will have the possibility to again set the watch... the latter is something very "intimate" and pleasureful

@DigitalPRCourses

Жыл бұрын

Get it on your wrist and you won’t care about the power reserve

It’s a very beautiful watch for men, Looks very well on your wrist the gold version

@WatchAdvisor

Жыл бұрын

It does - yes! But I personally do not wear any yellow or red gold... materials on my wrist must be "white" ...

@yellowwducky

Жыл бұрын

I am thinking it would be great...for my wife