Watch the next part here! (battleship conversion) - kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZKJ-xqahoJm0grw.html

@Blutankalpha

6 ай бұрын

Really good, Thanks!

@chrislang7460

6 ай бұрын

Always happy to use some time on quality content such as this. 30 mins of quality is better than 15 mins of pure fluff

@CAge_RAge7

6 ай бұрын

I love the longer videos

@tojekelt

6 ай бұрын

Me

@simonabunker

6 ай бұрын

It worked well - it didn't feel long. And a lot of your projects could do with a bit more time to show them off.

Aircraft carriers in real life steam into the wind at a speed that is a significant fraction of the landing speed of the aircraft, and also align their heading to any existing wind. For a fighter jet coming in at 120-130 kts, having 25-30 kts of carrier-made headwind and anything from 0 to 30+ kts of additional headwind from winds, removes a large amount of relative speed. Looking at the scaling here, it is a bit like trying to land an 737 on a stationary Nimitz/Ford carrier in real life...

@rebeccafishlock226

6 ай бұрын

That damn inverse square law is probably ruining them from running something more to scale!

@Project-Air

6 ай бұрын

Agreed! It absolutely helped flying/sailing into the wind with our test flights!

@atToebiscuit

6 ай бұрын

On a semi related note, the largest plane landed on an aircraft carrier was a C130 Hercules (roughly the same size as a 737) on the USS Forrestal (about 30 metres shorter than a Nimitz class)

@MCsCreations

6 ай бұрын

​@@atToebiscuitPoor passengers - if there were any. 😬

@mytube001

6 ай бұрын

@@atToebiscuit Yes, but a C-130 flies much slower on approach than a B 737. Probably 40-50 kts slower, which makes a huge difference. They also had a combined ship and wind headwind of 40+ kts. Landing roll decreases as the reduction in landing speed squared, so going from 100 kts to 60 kts reduces landing roll to just over a third.

I appreciate that there are people brave/crazy enough to do stuff like this for this 65 year-old kid to enjoy. Cheers, guys!

@denniswhite166

4 ай бұрын

I'm a 70 year old kid. It was y dream come rue - I had a 28' old wooden inboard I was planning to convert into an aircraft carrier but the engine blew on it so I scrapped the idea.

@riskinhos

3 ай бұрын

more like completely stupid. obviously it's not to scale.

@denniswhite166

3 ай бұрын

@@riskinhos No imagination huh?

@samgamerx9172

3 ай бұрын

​@@riskinhos you are very fun at parties huh

@1ndonly_gr3yhum4n

Ай бұрын

@@samgamerx9172we should bring him to party

Landing a 1/10 scale plane on a 1/100 scale aircraft carrier is MAD SKILL!

You found exactly the visibility problem found in WWII with that warbird. The Fleet Air Arm solved it with landing immediately from a sharp left hand turn as finals so the carrier was visible out to the side.

@ichosolemanuel6048

6 ай бұрын

wow I didnt know that

@poiujnbvcxdswq

6 ай бұрын

Captain "winkle" brown preferred crabbing in with it looking over the shoulder then straightening up for landing..however he was a ridiculously talented test pilot so probably not a technique for normal pilots.

@charlestonianbuilder344

6 ай бұрын

@@poiujnbvcxdswq the corsair could not be landed on a carrier if it werent for that landing technique, it was quicky adopted as standard for all corsair pilots due to less risks with it.

@MrLBPug

Ай бұрын

@@charlestonianbuilder344 Well, it _could_ be landed on a carrier without the left hand turn approach. The actual facts that made the Corsair "dangerous" to land were the tendency to stall the left wing first at slow speed (solved by adding a stall strip to the _right_ wing so both wings stalled at the same time) and the landing gear being very 'bouncy' so that the aircraft couldn't be set down properly (solved by adding bleed valves to the gear oleo struts). What helped as well were changes to the cockpit, with the seat being raised quite a bit and the switch to a more bulbous canopy, both useful to give the pilot better visibility over the nose. However, the left hand turn approach did help to keep the deck in view for most of the descent towards the carrier. Pilots levelled out only for the last part of the landing procedure, being guided in by the deck landing officer.

@r1_anon

28 күн бұрын

they have every cool thing equipped on the fly, except the most important one: ILS.

Hey, I'm a 12 year old who loves aircraft, and have an rc plane of my own. Me and my grandfather build stuff for it, repair it and its really fun! I was inspired by you to make bigger scale projects even though I don't have the biggest area to do these things. I also don't have a major budget, so watching your videos makes me really happy as it allows me to get the joy of having a really big rc workshop. Have a good day

@TheXshot

6 ай бұрын

What a lovely comment. Keep following your passion and you'll have your bigger workshop and budget in no time!

@----.__

6 ай бұрын

Enjoy the time with your grandfather. They're special memories that you'll never forget, and they're good for the soul. I used to make box kites with my grandfather and I still feel warm and fuzzy inside everytime I remember us giggling together and being silly while we made them. If you want something quick and easy to build with your granddad, then have a look at depron rc planes you can make yourself. There are thousands of plans online, you can build an entire plane out of one sheet of depron (foam) and a sheet costs around £5. Add some carbon rods and some cheap rc gear and you have yourself a homemade plane for under £50. The rc gear can be used over and over again, along with the carbon rods, so in effect you have unlimited depron rc planes for £5 each plus some hot glue! Once you've built a few you can start to put together your own designs, it's really quite easy. I'd be happy to make some plans I designed available online somewhere for you if it interests you? Here's a biplane I did years ago, inspired by the Pitts S-2 Special: watch?v=ALy-dYU7yro Forgive the quality of the video. Phone cameras weren't what they are today way back in 2009! The red and white pixels are the plane!

@theonewhoatebread4976

6 ай бұрын

@@TheXshot Thank you for the wishes!

@theonewhoatebread4976

6 ай бұрын

@@----.__ I appreciate it, and I cherish every moment with my grandfather. I appreciate the advice too, I'll try it out and see if we can make it happen using that kit!

@NotZoo531

6 ай бұрын

I'm 9 ._.

Just wait till a Japanese airplane see it.

@starninja_22

Ай бұрын

That crazy 😝

@Mr-nikey

Ай бұрын

Nah what hell

@joedyer8565

Ай бұрын

They never found the carriers, and sunk More by kamikazee than they did with their own ships or genuine air attack. At the end of the war we had 90 + carriers to japans 4 they had left

@Orient3m

Ай бұрын

BANZAI!!!

@leader-leaders

Ай бұрын

私は日本の偉大な天皇のために、そして先の大戦で戦った祖先のために戦います。私は先祖のために犠牲になります！神風！i will fight for our great emperor of japan and for our ancestors who fought in the great war. i will sacrifice for our ancestors! KAMIKAZE!私は帝国空軍と私の名誉ある先祖の名誉のためにこれを行います!バンザイ！

I'm glad y'all figured out to drive the boat forward when trying to land, plus to be fair that makes it more realistic.

I just spent half an hour watching a guy build an aircraft carrier - and enjoyed every second. damn these likes are coming in faster than a wildfire spreading

@theoffroad2013

6 ай бұрын

167 likes no replys? let me fix that

@g54b95

6 ай бұрын

Pro tip: If you increase the speed to 2x, it only takes 15:54.5

@p__7000

6 ай бұрын

But the 'carrier' isn't even CLOSE to the right scale compared to the aircraft??

@therctutor8100

6 ай бұрын

The carrier probably needs to be 5 times bigger for it o be scale to the planes. However it was all well done.

@TransportStudiosUK

6 ай бұрын

@@g54b95 Just speed it up to 4x, and it only takes 7:77.25 minutes.

The difficulty for pilots to see directly in front of the Corsair made carrier landings challenging during their use in WW2.

@xbpbat21x

6 ай бұрын

Thats right...the entire airframe was almost scrapped for this reason. It wasn't until the Brits figured it out. Making a shallow continuous banking turn from downwind, base, to final was the technique...helped to keep the carrier in sight until landing.

@RowenSmith-xo9ef

6 ай бұрын

did you watch devotion?

@Cats_Elite

6 ай бұрын

I love that plane so much i named my dog Corsair

@rocknrob2112

Ай бұрын

@@xbpbat21x That is how I do it in Flight Simulator and it works a treat! The Corsair is a mighty bird!

Well done! Congratulations to you for completing this huge construction project, developing the controls, and doing an excellent job flying the planes.

@bjunchygghgryd5y781

5 ай бұрын

Not

@bjunchygghgryd5y781

5 ай бұрын

He did not fly the planes very well

I am an RC aircraft pilot since 1986 till todate. I have never seen anyone make that kind of flying skill and land and build the large RC aircraft carrier. Well done!

I walked into the room to find my son was watching this. I stopped and watched like a zombie; totally enthralled. I'd imagined doing just this when I was a small boy. You made it look easy - great work 👏

@TheObsoletist33

3 ай бұрын

Try something like this with your son, you obviously have a shared interest. He's still a kid./

THAT WAS FANTASTIC!! Loved So Many moments of this!

@totallynotanoob9244

6 ай бұрын

Omg, is that really you, I’m such a big faannnnnnnnnn

@TheRealRCSparks

6 ай бұрын

@@totallynotanoob9244 Thanks brother! Love you guys too!

@aussieanimates

6 ай бұрын

3hrs ago hi Sparks!!

@firenicey7319

5 ай бұрын

He needed some aviators and Danger zone to complete the ensemble

@kingarthur4599

5 ай бұрын

Hi👋

As a military enthusiast, I saw something you forgot, that if you do another project like this, you should include. The object in question is the OLS, or optical landing system. A series of lights on the side of the flight deck that will look correct only if the plane is positioned correctly. Also, for such vessels that sit that high in the water, add a keel, preferably a folding one. That way you can sail without too much worry about wind, but you can still sail in relatively shallow waters. Also, just a suggestion, make everything heavier, the ship and the planes. This would increase the stability against many things, such as turbulence, even if it meant increased inertia. A heavier plane also means a much more firm landing, and less bouncing. Give it a try next time you attempt something like this.

Это было невероятно! Прекрасный полёт, и посадки, даже неудачная, тоже прекрасны! Я впечатлён. Люблю самолёты, и всегда мечтал о чём-то таком.

What a riot! Great fun. And properly narrated. Hanna, your LSO, deserves a medal!

flying rc airplanes myself, I know how hard it is to aim for such a small target. truely astonishing, well done mate!

This was one of the most wholesome videos I’ve seen in a while - I was so invested in seeing you try to stick those landings! Well done, and great piloting! 😅

I have flown mostly RC helicopters. I have designed and built 1/8th and 1/4 scale 4-wheel drive gas trucks. My suggestion would be to have the deck a little longer and have a jet net to fly into or loose strings to slow the planes down, not a sudden stop. Another suggestion would be a high quality Remote controller where your movements can be trimmed down so you don't have so much jerking motion. If you can get the controller to be super smooth then your approach would be flawless and you could land more easily.

Nicely done! I think repainting the deck with a matte darker paint, would help with the sun glare. Ballast would probably also help the carrier be more stable and drift less. If possible a lower FOV on the FPV cameras, while setting them higher and more forward in the cockpit, would help with spotting and recognizing the position of the carrier deck when approaching. Also, adding rubber bands to the arrestor wires could help avoid damage to the plane from a very sudden yank in the tail.

@memes4freexd503

6 ай бұрын

Also moving the wires forward could help since the plane is far more likely to touch down i the middle of the carrier compared to the end where the wires currently are

@w6krg

5 ай бұрын

I agree. There's a reason the flight decks are painted matte black with white markings. Also, the glideslope used is FAR too steep! Also, the faster the carrier is moving, the slower the apparent approach speed.

@SPDFRK

5 ай бұрын

A lot can be done to improve the carrier. Thrusters on the ship would help alignment. A tunnel from port to starboard both aft and stern with a reversible turbine. Maybe even have the plane and ship communicate through some sort of data transfer that I have no idea exists or not.

@dustinbrueggemann1875

5 ай бұрын

He's also flying without ANY instrumentation and still managing to hit the deck with relative consistency, and the deck isn't even configured with a properly dedicated landing path. Real aircraft overcome the cockpit visibility issues with lots of additional sensors, like alignment beacons and GPS/INS to match heading to the runway. These models are so hard because they're fully manual, but you could probably butter this with an ardupilot plane.

@valvodka

5 ай бұрын

Shut up know it all after the fact do nothing keyboard stroker

I'd love to see a revisit of this idea and maybe some improvements to the carrier. Maybe you could add a pair of deployable anchors so it can be steadied in the stream. Setting ship anchors will probably require some practice of it's own though. It honestly makes me want to make a huge RC ship that uses an electric trolling motor more than anything. That sounds like a fun winter project to be honest.

@MartinNoakes

5 ай бұрын

Keel. A flat blade down the middle would be a help

@aaravmaheshwari3647

5 ай бұрын

maby adding a fps camera on the deck could help with the landing

@adatanriverdii

4 ай бұрын

Can you make more larger a

@RazorsharpLT

4 ай бұрын

Honestly what would help better is a more decent FPV camera, and not having half of your view obscured by the cockpit Even Pilot's vision's aren't that bad.

@captaintoyota3171

4 ай бұрын

Keel all these RC guys think flat bottom=stable. But actually it doesnt. Make it twin keel or catamaran style if u want stability. And u can use sea anchor flaps under water/bow thrusters. That a slightly larger scale landing deck and elevators for storage is a must

So cool! And this is only the beginning, kids will see this and dream of building their own. Thanks for the inspiration!

This is probably the most sick aviation video I’ve ever seen. Especially it being on a small scale. I love planes, specifically RC planes, so I can fly them, so just felt super realistic, and I like that. Amazing job!

You were able to effectively build suspense from landing “fake” planes on a “fake” aircraft carrier That’s impressive Also the shots on the aircraft carrier and from the cockpits of the planes were really cool

@lamarw7757

6 ай бұрын

There's nothing fake about those planes. They aren't full scale. They are scale models. Real scale models.

@JamesDeanLP

6 ай бұрын

@@lamarw7757 bro takes everything literally 🤡

@flyingfools47

6 ай бұрын

There's nothing fake about an RC plane. They're real flying models

@Supgangy

6 ай бұрын

fake? an rc plane is an aircraft there is nothing fake about it.

@spongememefunnypants9101

5 ай бұрын

​@@lamarw7757I think what he's trying to say is he made cool scenes just by using rc planes.. I guess thats why he quoted fake...

Best use case for stereoscopic fpv vision so far! It'd be really interesting to see how much easier it makes landing 😁

@MCsCreations

6 ай бұрын

My advice would be 2 separate cameras and a FPV switch. One of the cameras pointed from, for flying, and the other next to the landing gear, pointed a bit down... Then you're golden! The issue would be to do the same with digital FPV... Walksnail or DJI... Because then I don't think it's possible. 😕

@toolbaggers

6 ай бұрын

Great 3d view of the cockpit! Just a regular FPV camera mounted on the top of the vertical stabilizer would be good enough.

@MCsCreations

6 ай бұрын

@toolbaggers That would give you almost a 3rd person view of the flight!

@martinsloan4075

6 ай бұрын

Realistic Color Scheme(Change to Black top colors and realistic lighting of the deck and the FPV would POP!) and Viewpoint of a pilot so cool!

Greetings from the Papaplatte community. Even though your landing skills don’t match the ones from our german pilot Rüdiger, it is a great video. Keep up the good work, it’s looking awesome mate 🤝

Suggestions for carrier part 2: Make carrier format long Add lights More plane Do it at night time Add heli landing

Brilliant all around! The epic video was an appropriately awesome documentary and conclusion for this one-of-a-kind massive project. As a filmmaker/editor, I can fully appreciate the level of dedication and skill it took to produce a 31 minute video. I love the extended format and would love to see more videos like this one.. With all that's happening in the world right now, it's a very welcome relief to know that I have one place where I can always look forward to projects (and people) that are as enjoyable and entertaining as they are educational.

@Project-Air

6 ай бұрын

Thanks for the lovely comment 🙂

@Toro_Gibson

6 ай бұрын

​@@Project-Aircan you use bombers on the aircraft carrier in the near future vids?🤔

Im envious of your future children man 😭. Keep that passion going!

Kevin hast du nen Kinderwunsch

Very cool build! Along with your friend’s idea of an LSO, it would be fairly simple to build a “ball” glide slope light system. They use lights and fresnel lenses to give an indication of on slope, high, or low that you would be able to see in the FPV view. Might be worth a try?

@rcskybums

6 ай бұрын

These models are too susceptible to wind that simulating a glide slope assist would be pointless. The plane would be bobbing up and down from the turbulence of those trees and draft from the lake, and you won’t be able to maintain a steady glide slope

@derekfleming2297

6 ай бұрын

Nerds🤓

@cwacholtz3459

5 ай бұрын

I love planes I like rc planes real plane testing planes in games and real life

@dustinbrueggemann1875

5 ай бұрын

@@rcskybums It would still give direct visual indication of being on target. He doesn't need the beacons for descent control, he needs them to know when he's aligned to the landing strip.

FINALLY! The first real attempt at an RC carrier operation on KZread in years. Well done!

@therealspeedwagon1451

6 ай бұрын

I know right? It’s always been my dream to make a to scale rc aircraft carrier and land rc planes to scale on it. I’d love to see a historically accurate one too

It’s fun and stuff until your enemy sends out a f35

This was incredible! Hope to see move vids of landings on the rc craft carrier.

You need to have a naval battle with "FliteTest" now!!!! Lmfao. Awesome project!!!

@wolflarsen941

6 ай бұрын

You want that prop about 4-6in under water. It'll give you a bit more "purchase" than if it's breaking the surface. Bow thrusters would help with "tracking" to keep vessel lined up while the aircraft are on approach. As well as steering. The camera may need to be under the cockpit. Such a fun project.

Thanks for having me on man, and congrats again on pulling it off! Absolutely legendary

@Project-Air

6 ай бұрын

Thank you, Brendan! Anytime!

Every single bit of this was super impressive to me. Getting an actual pilot that does this on video call? That alone felt like something out of a movie. Amazing.

That was amazing, congratulations. And the sponsorship made perfect sense, glad that they could help you.

you needed Ultra Micro RC Planes. Also if possible anchor the boat front and rear.

This man deserves his own TV show! Something like Top Gear.

@jamesfieweger8648

6 ай бұрын

Funny thing that the lake this was filmed on is the same lake that the Top Gear lads tested their first amphibious cars in.

@Jazz-Man1910

6 ай бұрын

@@jamesfieweger8648 Oh yeah, I heard about that in one of the last vids.

@jamesfieweger8648

6 ай бұрын

@@Jazz-Man1910 I just remembered the name of the lake from the Top Gear episode. At the time I believe it was Rudyard Reservoir but it’s identified here as Rudyard Lake. I also recognized the boat launch.

I think you should cut a few holes in the inside walls. The split in the middle of the boat would make it extremely unstable in case it sinks. If the hull is damaged, you could get a nasty list to whichever side the hole is located .

Part of me is laughing at the realization that this Lad probably has more Aircraft Carrier Operator Experience than most countries in their entirety! Coolest vid I've seen in awhile!

@Fantasticallistical

3 ай бұрын

Ikr

Jolly good job, lad. Started RC in the early 70s and I am still at it. This was a real treat - congrats to the entire team!

If you had a few of these, a few of DIY perks submarines, and some rc battleships you could throw together an rc navy. Combine that with a very calm lake and dozens of your closest friends and you could have some very fun rc naval activities. I'd love to see a community built for this

Wow! Just randomly found this, really enjoyed it, had my heart pounding on a few of those landing attempts, I just subscribed, so I hope there's some other interesting vids in the library, thanks for posting..awesome job 👍

"..apparently, not being able to see from the cockpit makes a huge difference..." Well said my RC friend! 🤩 AWESOME VIDEO!!!

Since RC planes are a lot lighter than real ones, they are a lot more susceptible to wind. You could allow your carrier to adapt to this by utilizing a net instead of the wires, which would have more tolerances (depending on how large you make it)

@MichaelWeisbrook

5 ай бұрын

If fact aircraft carriers have nets in case like the hook on the end is faulty, doesn’t exist, or has been lost.

@matthewwilson5019

5 ай бұрын

@@MichaelWeisbrook i know early ww2 carriers had nets, but im not sure about the modern carriers

@blastermuchrp1877

5 ай бұрын

@@matthewwilson5019 they do

@dustinbrueggemann1875

5 ай бұрын

@@matthewwilson5019 they're used in emergency procedures all the time. It catches the aircraft from the front and is used when the arresting wire is unavailable for some reason

@valvodka

5 ай бұрын

Really? Toy planes are lighter than real ones. Wow. Thanks for the input

That Carrier is crazy awesome, I would have made a few tweaks, 1, drop the aft trolling motor or get a long shaft trolling motor so that it can better run the carrier forward. 2, add bow thrusters to help stabilize when the wind acts up. (Tieing them together with bow and stern motors can prolly be hooked up to a fishing spot lock that most fishermen use, allowing it to stay put automatically) 3, the spotter was crazy helpful, just like a real carrier you can add a HD camera facing aft for aiding in lands when the main boat isn't in line with the deck. Really really cool and prolly one of the best RC designs I've seen LOVE IT!

i think the biggest improvement that you could make is to have more arrestor wires or move them further forward. having to aim for that 1 exact point at the end of the ship made it even harder for yourself. But this was very enjoyable!

For easier landing you need to install ,,Arresting cable"(If you don t know what is it, it's a cable that catches plane wheels for instant landing). You need to be rewarded for that hard work👍🤝

@TheTrueMr.Chicken

Ай бұрын

He _did_ install arresting cables though?

I’m really impressed how durable these are RC planes are. Congratulations successful landing! Awesome 🎉

you should add a ramp to the rear of the carrier so that your possible approach angle becomes a bit wider, with some slight mods im sure you could make the carrier far more stable and controllable in the water, maybe even a small bow screw and an automated system to keep it in a straight line. maybe some long flat planes under the boat to make it drift less relative to the wind. this is a really cool project and i would love to see a part 2 on this, it was a rather fun watch

One of the Simple, Ambitious and Amazing project I See

Found you on this video and I can say I'm quite proud I did. That rewarding smile at the end as you sailed back ^-^

Building a dream so many of us have had 🔥❤️. Awesome video James! And LOVE the longer format. When’s the TV show start? 😁

@Project-Air

6 ай бұрын

Thanks guys! I’ll keep at it!

@Av-vd3wk

6 ай бұрын

@@Project-Air You gotta get that prop deeper on the water!!! You’re losing propulsion having the top bit out of the water.

I love these longer videos becaus not only is it just the process and the final build but the engineering behind it is cool to watch.

This video is so inspiring! It shows that you really can archieve almost everything if you really want it and have enough determination! It was beautiful to watch you fullfil this big dream and crazy idea with the help of your friends! These landings were amazing! Great Job! Keep on the great work!!

Awesome job! When you get more experience with the Corsair you will be able to land it even better. Tricky plane, but the flaps help to get the landing speed down. Really fun to watch, thanks

Oh man, you make different stages of engineering in one video. Idea, development, simulation, electronic, verification and validation. I take off my hat of admiration about your video.

I was not expecting this video. Did not expect this will be this good 10 out of 10.😂

Only seen this done a couple of times before but I think your aircraft were the largest, which would make things tougher for you - good job guys.

Wer von denen ist Papaplatte?

@jakob.s777

26 күн бұрын

Der nicht filow

I like the feedback people are giving you. This is a great video. I feel this deserves a retry with a bigger carrier, and maybe jet rcs. Also taking into consideration what some said about air speed relative to carrier speed in the water.

CARRIER FLANK SPEED! I was screaming at my screen, lol. Real life carriers cruise into the wind. The faster the better, much easier to land with your relative speed to the carrier low! Ive dreamed of doing this for 20yrs, awesome job!

That was really impressive! Really ambitious project! It might be easier if the FPV camera was slung under the belly? I guess the obvious extension is adding bombs or torpedoes! Can't wait to see what you come up with to outdo this. Is this an official Guinness record?

This video was so much fun to watch. Your pure passion and joy is contagious

Great work. Loved it. I've been waiting to see someone do this for a couple of years now. Absolutely fantastic! I would love to see a larger carrier build with the same aircraft. And try digital FPV instead of analog. you'll get a much clearer image and better dept perception on the landing. 👍😊

Awesome work! Glad this video was recommended. Look forward to seeing your other projects.

I’ve been wanting to see this type of thing done for many years. A controlled anchor in bow and stern, set with the wind, would give you to stability in any proper position you require.

2:07 love the activate windows in the corner its a good touch

That is awesome! As someone who has split his head open with at 60 size helicopter I was a bit twitchy watching you fly those planes toward yourself. lol Great job thought. Next time, more bigger carrier and try a plane with brakes!

You should do a part 2 . And add some small thrusters on the sides to help with steering. You could then have a separate person keeping the carrier steady. Thanks for the fun!

@teaganwilliams562

5 ай бұрын

Part three should be adding airsoft defence systems

Bro, this project was incredible and it was well put together, kept me on edge right through and I was cheering like a madman when you landed it! Amazing achievement! Didn't even realize it was 30 min! Keep it up man!

I love people that make interesting videos, and are simple explaining at it keep up the good work

Meine Chicken Nuggets verbrennen!!!!!!!!😮🎉

*_This looks amazing! Great job!_*

Awesome project. Think there's room here for improvement and a follow up too. Looks like you still need to work out the FPV camera positioning for attack angle to sight the deck! How about using flaperons to reduce the approach speed on the planes without flaps? Maybe move the arresting wires and tower forward on the deck too to improve landing success without hitting the tower.

Awesome, the whole thing coming together with the planes and boat was great.

Well done Lad! The level of difficulty to make this content happen ... I thought your chances were slim to none and I found myself clapping when you landed the Corsair ... I was THAT invested in the Landing ... Respect

I have flown both the AeroScout and the 1.1 Trojan; I found the AeroScout to be surprisingly fun to fly, and the Trojan to have very low wing loading vs. other Trojans. Great choices!

Could you please do a follow-up video sometime when you take off and land your model F-14 on the carrier? If the wings don't swing out I understand, but if they did, I think that would be really cool. I really enjoyed the video, and want to make a smaller version myself.

was really cool, but an edit that would be really useful is moving the arrester cables forward slightly instead of so close to the edge, and maybe span the ramp across the entire end of the carrier so launching and aborting the land if the cables are missed is much easier.

wow thanks for a super great video, that must be the best hobby/rc or DIY video ever and a big shout out to your dad,what a great dad and your so lucky to have such a wonderful team behind you, Im really super impressed, great work

Im an aerospace engineer and you are one of my idols!

@thespacewhiz

6 ай бұрын

Same

@PA3GUQ

6 ай бұрын

You are his idol i guess, hehe.

The fact that it actually works is amazing! Now you just need to bb guns

Bloody brilliant. I want to see someone land a model jet on a model aircraft carrier though!

Freaking epic I waited years for someone to do this again...great job bro definitely want to see some more asap 🙏🏾

I've waited forever for someone to try something like this and I'm so glad someone had done this. Also it might've helped with glare on the t28 and corsair if the cockpit plastic glass was removed and the camera were moved more towards the nose. Also i hope we can see more videos of the carrier put into action. Maybe even see a edf jet take off and land from it

This was great!! Good job!! 2-3 landing and 3-3 take offs!! Amazing!! I truly didn’t think you get any on the deck!! Proved me wrong!! Bad ass flying man!! That practice paid off!! I would of choked… you did it!! Mission success!!

A suggestion i have might be to incerase the height of the wires that catch the planes which might make it a bit easier to land because I noticed that the planes always came in a bit high for them

CONGRATULATIONS! VERY WELL DONE! EXCELLENT! Keep flying! George

James, great vid mate! For a project like this, the length was perfect. Having marked off a carrier deck on the runway and attempted landings, I think you did well. I used a 1.4m Corsair in some attempts, and it is tough. Cheers! FYI, I always raise the FPV cam, it's easy to get the panel with the wide angle lens.😉 I got decent Stearman footage that way.

Congratulations on an absolutely spectacular project. To take it one step further, had you thought of a spin off project. Landing is everything. Had you thought about building a landing system where you can use visual aids the same way Navy pilots do, eg the landing lights on the PORT side of the flight deck. Through FPV, this would be impressive. Congrats again, really great video. 🙂

Awesome!! That looked alot of fun, great content, keep up the great work

Maaaaaaannnn that was awesome! Keep doing this stuff, people really appreciate it!

I got to say your projects are really inspirational for me! Absolutely love them!

This has got to be one of the coolest videos I've seen today. Congrats on your 2/3 success on landing on the deck! Looking forward to your next videos.

1. Landed by hitting the wall 3. Landed by hitting it the tower Modern problems require modern solutions.

Very cool project! The easiest kind of RC plane to land in those circumstances would be a specialised STOL airframe like a Funcub or Tundra. A large foamie 3D airframe doing a high-AOA harrier landing would also come to a stop sooner than the pusher or the T-28. Flying LOS should be easier than FPV, as long as the pilot is close enough to have a good view of the deck, preferably from the side. Arguably, that's not in the spirit of a scale landing. Pulling the carrier into say a 10 knot apparent headwind would also help greatly.