That’s a great ABC watch, I am glad it doesn’t have Bluetooth.
@zackamanda97997 ай бұрын
I bought the GW-9500-1 and the GW-9500-3 in the last month. I paid $220.00 for the GW-9500-3 and $230.00 for the GW-9500-1. As the owner of 3 different Casio Protrek PRW-3500's I noticed the new Mudman has all the same functions in the exact same order as you go through the modes , even the winglits on the band. Basically the new Mudman is the PRW-3500 in G-Shock style.
@user-gw6mn5sc5j11 ай бұрын
Cool watch! Thanks Big E
@artx750110 ай бұрын
so much for being connected. glad this one doesn't have Bluetooth. I will have to see the challenge with negative display. at the end of it, it's a Gshock with triple sensor. was eying protrek but this one is better. thanks for this quick review.
@artx7501
8 ай бұрын
using it and that negative display is not that bad after all. so it's a 👍🏾
@LEGOTROLL111 ай бұрын
Not a negative display fan but still a cool watch. 👍✌️
@EricSloferwatchreviews
11 ай бұрын
I'm a get the positive
@ProjectSerpo90
2 ай бұрын
@@EricSloferwatchreviewsits such a shame because i absolutely love the colors on this model but i hate the negative display. Huge fan of positive and MIP displays but it seems like all the colors i love have negative displays, go figure lol.
@simonbeasley9895 ай бұрын
Agree on Bluetooth, prefer MB6. I have a smart watch and 2 G Shocks and if I want to connect to a phone I use the smart watch! I think solar is by far the most important feature. If it was solar might have been tempted by the GG-B100-1A9ER but a total deal breaker for me, a super tough waterproof watch that stops working after 2 years then you have to get someone to take it apart.
@davidcallan78445 ай бұрын
Dollar for dollar I’ll still take the GXW56BB1JF or the GX56BB1 also comes in positive display models and is a direct descendant of the original square. These are cool but I don’t need the extra bells and whistles like 98% of users who aren’t military. Great review.
@marcvanheugten94724 ай бұрын
Nice master of G, always liked that series for having the puppet on the back. Should I get a red one or wait for a stealth version
@samaka-hb3ut5 ай бұрын
La couleur de l'affichage est-il changeable ?
@roninas5 ай бұрын
Is it really that bad with negative display? Anybody share your experience?
@juswatch75823 ай бұрын
I went with the positive display for the 9500 because the negative display on my 9400 Rangeman is 👎🏾.
@jluciano47688 ай бұрын
I need one
@carlolacsina312211 ай бұрын
protrek with a g-shock body
@bushtrash22868 ай бұрын
I like this watch but it reminds me of my prg270 , and my prg270 is butt ugly but is awesome at the same time.
@niallclay63736 ай бұрын
Would this fit a 6.5 inch wrist?
@EricSloferwatchreviews
6 ай бұрын
Yes
@YourSoulDriver6 ай бұрын
"As you can see..." No, I can't. Positive display iit is.
@markcallaghan838911 ай бұрын
so until you put the back light on i could hardly see the digits in your well lit studio, i am out
@EricSloferwatchreviews
11 ай бұрын
I prefer the positive display too
@corvostok
10 ай бұрын
@@EricSloferwatchreviews Casio has better negative displays that they could have used on this watch (MIP display).
@karel316Ай бұрын
l čemu je stupnice na pravé straně sklíčka hodinek? Víto vůbec někdo? Já ne!
Пікірлер: 25
That’s a great ABC watch, I am glad it doesn’t have Bluetooth.
I bought the GW-9500-1 and the GW-9500-3 in the last month. I paid $220.00 for the GW-9500-3 and $230.00 for the GW-9500-1. As the owner of 3 different Casio Protrek PRW-3500's I noticed the new Mudman has all the same functions in the exact same order as you go through the modes , even the winglits on the band. Basically the new Mudman is the PRW-3500 in G-Shock style.
Cool watch! Thanks Big E
so much for being connected. glad this one doesn't have Bluetooth. I will have to see the challenge with negative display. at the end of it, it's a Gshock with triple sensor. was eying protrek but this one is better. thanks for this quick review.
@artx7501
8 ай бұрын
using it and that negative display is not that bad after all. so it's a 👍🏾
Not a negative display fan but still a cool watch. 👍✌️
@EricSloferwatchreviews
11 ай бұрын
I'm a get the positive
@ProjectSerpo90
2 ай бұрын
@@EricSloferwatchreviewsits such a shame because i absolutely love the colors on this model but i hate the negative display. Huge fan of positive and MIP displays but it seems like all the colors i love have negative displays, go figure lol.
Agree on Bluetooth, prefer MB6. I have a smart watch and 2 G Shocks and if I want to connect to a phone I use the smart watch! I think solar is by far the most important feature. If it was solar might have been tempted by the GG-B100-1A9ER but a total deal breaker for me, a super tough waterproof watch that stops working after 2 years then you have to get someone to take it apart.
Dollar for dollar I’ll still take the GXW56BB1JF or the GX56BB1 also comes in positive display models and is a direct descendant of the original square. These are cool but I don’t need the extra bells and whistles like 98% of users who aren’t military. Great review.
Nice master of G, always liked that series for having the puppet on the back. Should I get a red one or wait for a stealth version
La couleur de l'affichage est-il changeable ?
Is it really that bad with negative display? Anybody share your experience?
I went with the positive display for the 9500 because the negative display on my 9400 Rangeman is 👎🏾.
I need one
protrek with a g-shock body
I like this watch but it reminds me of my prg270 , and my prg270 is butt ugly but is awesome at the same time.
Would this fit a 6.5 inch wrist?
@EricSloferwatchreviews
6 ай бұрын
Yes
"As you can see..." No, I can't. Positive display iit is.
so until you put the back light on i could hardly see the digits in your well lit studio, i am out
@EricSloferwatchreviews
11 ай бұрын
I prefer the positive display too
@corvostok
10 ай бұрын
@@EricSloferwatchreviews Casio has better negative displays that they could have used on this watch (MIP display).
l čemu je stupnice na pravé straně sklíčka hodinek? Víto vůbec někdo? Já ne!