Well done France. All the best for the future projects. Love from 🇮🇳.

@Axel_Roffi

2 жыл бұрын

France and India should totally sign a strategic military deal and build together aircraft carrier as they both have Rafale and go beyond...France and India would be a great fit, no wars or colonialism between these countries, great engineers in both countries, they do not fight for the same areas...

Well done! DGA and Naval Group are the best!

@eiqcy9977

3 жыл бұрын

@Paul Franciosi certainly not 😂

Thank you for the subtitles.

La forcé de Frapp has 4 Submarines with atomic bombs to attack with missiles to defend Europe.

Hello from Cherbourg, where the French submarines are being built, at a factory I see every day from my high school

@devmalyoroy2198

3 жыл бұрын

Hi how are you

@lancelotgohel8460

3 жыл бұрын

@@devmalyoroy2198 fine and you?

@devmalyoroy2198

3 жыл бұрын

@@lancelotgohel8460 I am from India in Delhi and would like to be friends with you , if you are interested. Hopefully we we will get along .

Ils est trop beau. Et un beau bateau c'est un bateau qui navigue bien. J'ai hâte de voir le snle 3g. La même allure...(?)

Félicitations pour cette superbe réalisation ! Ceci étant dit je ne comprends pas pourquoi les noms et visages des militaires et industriels ne sont pas cachés ! …

The defend of Europe depends on France with La Force de Frapp.

@lordtemplar9274

3 жыл бұрын

FYI this is not a sub which launches nuclear missiles. It's an attack sub with conventional weapons but is nuclear powered, instead of diesel etc...

@etiennegiroux9146

3 жыл бұрын

France yes! The only EU country that has a potent army. Shame on Germany.

@lordtemplar9274

3 жыл бұрын

@@etiennegiroux9146 do you really want a germany with biggest army in europe? Hasn't been very good for europe in the last 150 years. Careful what you wish for 😉

@etiennegiroux9146

3 жыл бұрын

I just want them to take responsibility in 2020. Time has changed.

@lordtemplar9274

3 жыл бұрын

@@etiennegiroux9146 and history has a habit of repeating itself ;) They do not necessarily bigger army. Even with their current army they could be more helpful in Sahel or vs Turkish aggression in the Med

Can't wait to see these beauties in Australia

@kiefferfx18

3 жыл бұрын

@Conan Rafael is an Israelian company. French fighter is Dassault Rafale

@lordtemplar9274

3 жыл бұрын

@Conan it did not take long for delivery, which is on schedule. What is taking long is for India to make a decision on MMRCA bid. This has been going on for nearly 2 decades and still no decision has been made. That is why Modi ordered a batch of 36 Rafale in 2015, with specific modifications for the IAF. Meanwhile Kuwait is still waiting for its first Typhoon

@aussienscale

3 жыл бұрын

@Infinite Plain Rubbish, take some time to understand Defence acquisition in Australia before you sprout a bullshit number for construction costs !

@manavsingh9822

3 жыл бұрын

@Infinite Plain It's not that simple. Diesel subs weigh less than nuclear subs. Nuclear subs require deeper waters to operate in, which are not viable towards upper Australia with its shallow waters. Although the 89 billion is very expensive no doubt, it's not the price for the subs alone. Its the subs, plus maintenance costs, service costs, building costs and soo much more to support our subs, servicemen and our sub industry. WE ARE NOT capable of supporting nuclear subs. We lack infrastructure, experience and capability to produce and support nuclear power. If would take us ages to be ready for nuclear. Plus WE ARE NOT just buying nuclear subs and converting them to diesel. Thats not how it works. We are taking certain design aspects from the nuclear subs, like how diameter of the hull and other things. We are incorporating certain aspects of a nuclear design into a custom and entirely new diesel sub. We are not getting a nuclear sub and just chucking a diesel motor in it.

@manavsingh9822

3 жыл бұрын

@Tango down. WE ARE NOT capable of supporting nuclear subs. We lack infrastructure, experience and capability to produce and support nuclear power. If would take us ages to be ready for nuclear. Plus WE ARE NOT just buying nuclear subs and converting them to diesel. Thats not how it works. We are taking certain design aspects from the nuclear subs, like how diameter of the hull and other things. We are incorporating certain aspects of a nuclear design into a custom and entirely new diesel sub. We are not getting a nuclear sub and just chucking a diesel motor in it. Diesel subs may lack the endurance of nuclear subs, but they're a heck of a lot quieter, which if you didn't already know, is like the major goal of any submarine in order to stay un-detected. Ps, if you are unaware, pump jet is a form of propulsion, it is like a propeller, it has nothing to do with wether or not the sub is nuclear or diesel powered.

@Naval News: merci pour vos super vidéos, toujours au niveau. Par contre pourriez-vous soit interdire les commentaires soit éliminer les commentaires ouvertement injurieux, notamment de la part d'internautes qui ne supportent pas quoi que ce soit de français? Merci...

@bvalendoff2480

3 жыл бұрын

J'adore mais par contre il il y a quelqu'un que je connais il s'appelle Steeve il le 1 maître je ne sais pas quoi

With the recent probable loss of La Perle, this is even more important.

@bo2web

3 жыл бұрын

Naval Group will replace the bow of the damaged submarine with that of the SNA Saphir, which left active service in 2019

@lordtemplar9274

3 жыл бұрын

@@bo2web thx i had read that, apparently Naval group says it will add 6 months to the refit the Perle was undergoing when the fire broke out. This does not seem that long, but i guess the damage was limited since a lot of the interior equipment had been removed for the refit before the fire.

I LIKE !

A quoi servent les vitres au bord de fuite du massif (visibles à partir de 4:00)?

@franckallegre7062

2 жыл бұрын

Je me pose la même question 🤔🤔 ??

@erwanbegede2185

Жыл бұрын

C’est pour vérifier, lorsque tu as appuyé sur le bouton, que le missile est bien parti.

Le nom du commandant du sous-marin apparaît clairement ...une bonne douzaine de services secrets amid ou ennemis en ont pris note... mais sauf foutent les services cartes de la sécurité ?

Les mecs vivent ensemble dans un sous marin, cloitrés, et on leurs faits porter des masques à l'arrivée en rade....Ridicule !

👍👍😁😁😁😁

Naval news, ça eut été mieux en français, non ? nouvelles navales ?

price please from India

@thetrist333

3 жыл бұрын

Thoses are not for sales lol

@philv3941

3 жыл бұрын

This one is nuke, 9 billion dollars, the non-nuke export version is 2.6 billion

@thetrist333

3 жыл бұрын

@@philv3941 this one does not transport nuke lol

@philv3941

3 жыл бұрын

@@thetrist333 it's nuclear powered yes. The export version is not. Just fact check this.

@thetrist333

3 жыл бұрын

@@philv3941 I know that....but beeing nuclear powered and transporting nuke are two complete differents things lol

Harbour trials there look much more agreeable than Faslane!

..The barracuda was a Russian sub . Probably the model name of one type of sub . I understand the French barracuda refers to a class of sub . Because of politics Australia has decided not have nuclear poweredsubs but to embark on some job creation scheme building dieseled conversions of what were formerly nuclear subs . In future like twenty years we'll finally realise the mistake . Completion of first two subs is twenty years away . Diesel subs are vulnerable cos they need to surface often so revealing themselves to satellite . I think the only countries that sell ready made subs for purchase are Sweden and Russia . Sweden with population of ten million mark is able to build submarines, ; very impressive . We who live in Australia have the general feeling that Australians aren't up to standard for building submarines which are highly intricate prices of engineering . Near enough ain't good enough .

@ericlaurent6084

3 жыл бұрын

No countries sell subs from the shelf. It's absolutely impossible. And Australia didn't buy nuclear subs because nobody sells nuclear subs. Theu're top secret. And incredibly expensive. Much too expensive for what Australia wanted to spend. .

frence vs torkey..i hope that who superior

@hermann7733

3 жыл бұрын

France is totally superior.

@Mael1er

2 жыл бұрын

haha, Tukish navy would be destroyed in one hour, we just will fire some MdCN missiles, the Suffren can destroy *alone* the Turkish navy withour realoding. We don't even need to move the fleet of Toulon, and after, the planes off the Charles De Gaulle would clean leftovers, if some Turkish submarines escaped the massacre, they will not go far, will be destroyed by an anti-submarine frigate or a Breguet Atlantic, they are diesel submarines, they must refuel. Destroying the Turkish fleet is a *game* for us.

Sudder street juice intelligence.

I wish Australia had a nuclear industry so we could have just ordered these! Instead of some bastard child thats going to cost as much as the nuclear version but b less capable if not obselete with its propulsion sinse theyre not having a new battery technology and i dont think AIP iether!!

@philv3941

3 жыл бұрын

You know, the tech of the shortfin has been tested ( in dock) and seems very efficient as expected, with ultra long range has expected, far beyond german AIP . For the price, your version is 2.6 bilion one, the nuke 9 billion ( that said the nuke has a much much longer range so you need less sub for the same missions)

@philv3941

3 жыл бұрын

Sorry, i read some stuff your govt dropped the AIP/LITHIUM tech from Scorpene for diesel/ led acid batt ... not sure

@montys420-

3 жыл бұрын

@@philv3941 yeah they have for the 1st ship idk why they need to drop AIP since its tech is mature but cause of long distances traveled by Aus subs lithium is good for high power but only short runs

@montys420-

3 жыл бұрын

@@philv3941 and yeah the countries having the debate about nuclear now, but Australia does not have a civilian nuclear industry so it would be hardto have nuclear technicians from Australia without a civilian industry

@philv3941

3 жыл бұрын

@@montys420- it is , but i don't know how important it is cause you have to refuel, so to touch nuke parts, one time each ten years. So a specific formation for maintenance and a refuel protocol in Australia or france or britain should be enough. The nuke version is very expensive though ( but it comes with 10 years of fuel ;) )

Je connais se sous marin c celui d'un ami

@Wiwi_37

3 жыл бұрын

Mon cousin a moins de chance il en a eu un de l'ancienne classe (👁'👄'👁) 😅

😂😂😂😂😂😂

Now why can't we get this vessel in America ...?

@pclaurent64

3 жыл бұрын

@Infinite Plain The best ingeneering pieces take their time to be delivered. Now be assured that the 6 planned Barracuda class SSN will be delivered to the Marine Nationale and will be among the best submarines of their kind.

@philv3941

3 жыл бұрын

@Infinite Plain zero troubles known. We are just in time to replace Rubis class sub, we already have nuke sub, and we had Scorpene class to conceive, produce and sell in the same time. We have not your military budget and this sub is 9 billion to find. So it need time if you want things to be done and well done. We are a small country, but don't underestimate us : dassault ( rafale, falcon jet) , airbus, ariane rockets, tanks, nuke sub, nuke carriers: we know how to do reliable efficient and top notch tech.

@philv3941

3 жыл бұрын

@Infinite Plain so what ? 9 years from the first cut to the hull closing, including a new nuke reactor conception very few countries in the world are able to do, the building of a compmetely brand new simulators, the most advanced pump jet. And in the same time, same place produce and export Scorpene class. Just do the same if you can. It's not that crazy, we have not the budget of the USA ( yet, USA used the french CATIA software from Dassault, just like us, to design the virgia class...)

@philv3941

3 жыл бұрын

@Infinite Plain i can't imagine you are limited enough to think it's a competition to build a quick as you can. First, you lied. Built of Astute and Barracuda are not in the same time : the first steel cut of the Barracuda began at the launch of the firts Astute, just check. So Barracuda is 6 years more recent, in base conception. And we upgraded many component design during the built. Your Astute is 6 years construction, but 3 years to be commissionned and... 4 Years more to be declared fully operationnal ! 7 years to patch problems After the build. 7 years lost to enhance the design. Now Astute is a generation behind. Sorry, but Baracuda is put on the water in end 2019, had tested shallow and very deep waters in the year passed, had tested and fired all the weapons with success, is now delivered to the Marine, and is scheduled to be fully operationnal in 2021. We prefer be late but be good. You had choosen to let the problem for the client. It's nuke sub, it's a marathon, not a sprint. And if you need to wait to embed to latest tech or sonar ( and barracuda is equipped with so many new tech) you wait.

@philv3941

3 жыл бұрын

@Infinite Plain sorry but there are not prototypes. And 7 year before water and operationnal service for your prototype : don't be cocky with that, stay low profile, don't blame other to put 13 year before conception to delivery. For the tech : We french are doing your sonar, and we conceived it 10 years before the Barracuda's one, of course the Astute one is good ( it's french) but it's outdated. The Astute Pump jet is 10 years conception older, the optronic mast is french, and a copy by Thales of the first Sagem we made. So both of the key tech of your sub is our engineering. Come on, we deliver this for you wich : 1) explain it's quicker to made 2) our tech is more recent. But don't worry, with all this french tech Astute is surely a good sub.

L iga parle trop vite. Polytechnique oblige

Quel anglais atroce et ridicule! J'arrête. C'est trop insupportable. Pourquoi ne pas parler français et utiliser un interprète ?

@mortenmoicmoigladys1236

3 жыл бұрын

tais toi lolo tu me casse les noix

@Antoineforum

2 жыл бұрын

In order to deliver a comprehensive message to the world of course. It's better to speak global instead of local language. Even it's awfull

I heard the crew already surrendered to Danish fishing boats.

@lordtemplar9274

3 жыл бұрын

So would most, the vikings were great sailors who spread fear cross Europe. At least didn't have to pay a big ransom 😀

@jjjppp1780

3 жыл бұрын

@Arthur William its obviously a joke,i mean I'm french and even I found it funny

@philv3941

3 жыл бұрын

Being french, i surrender to any danish girl and let her do anything she wants from me

@Solveig.Tissot

Жыл бұрын

Average Virgin Cringe Brainless Fatherless Anti France Troll Fanboy taking Copium over here ⬆️