When an educated person is frequently willing to say I don't know, that is a person worth listening to

@arpitthakur45

2 жыл бұрын

If he said i know...does that mean, he is not educated?...i dont know why i see this kinds of comments in youtube videos like these...are you judging his attitude whether he is humble or arrogant?

@paulmaloney2383

2 жыл бұрын

@@arpitthakur45 I think your missing the message,. It means and educated person is willing to accept he may not know something entirely and be in doubt and willing to know learn more as opposed to some who is confident but not aware of his ignorance

@arpitthakur45

2 жыл бұрын

@@paulmaloney2383 bro i get your point...but i often see people find arrogance in very small things... I got the gist of your point but the thing is i know people who say i dont know because its a defensive move and they are just often afraid to challenge there thoughts...i had a friend who said to me once "i dont know and therefore you also dont know" and i knew the thing he was talking about...people project these things on others if they are afraid of getting corrected themselves...

@arpitthakur45

2 жыл бұрын

@@paulmaloney2383 i cant express the tone here...

@moses777exodus

2 жыл бұрын

Laws of the Universe exist Independent of anyone's personal beliefs in the existence of the Laws of the Universe. Just as man-made laws govern society globally, Universal Laws govern the entire Universe. Un-directed random natural processes have never been observed or experimentally demonstrated to be capable of producing any form of laws. As scientifically confirmed, non-material laws are the product of only Mind / Consciousness / Intelligence.

Freeman Dyson is the man. He helped create QED and he doesn't even have a PhD. He did everything his own way.

@ihsahnakerfeldt9280

4 жыл бұрын

"B-but he doesn't have any fancy c-credentials so he must be wrong." You'd be surprised at how many people actually think like this.

@nathanforrest3483

4 жыл бұрын

He does have a PhD. Pretty huge dick ! 😅

@tada3922

3 жыл бұрын

PhD is a formality. He could have obtained hundreds of PhD, but what's the point?

@Bobby-fj8mk

3 жыл бұрын

@@nathanforrest3483 - Dyson joined the faculty at Cornell as a physics professor in 1951, though he still had no doctorate. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeman_Dyson

@johntexas8417

3 жыл бұрын

He made the GED? WOW. I got a GED

What a great and honorable guy. I love humble scientists who admit the obvious truth of them all-that this existence of ours is a strange place that we know very little of. Guys like him are hard to come by. Simply beautiful.

@irenehartlmayr8369

9 ай бұрын

Precisely !

@rocketsurgeon1746

15 күн бұрын

So, can we make room for ID and creation?

I'm not sure we have enough scientists like Freeman Dyson anymore. What a man. Truly inspiring, and a soul that will be sorely missed. At least in this reality.

I agree with Freeman on each and every statement he made. This talk should be made as a preface to every textbook on physics, mathematics,chemistry, biology or theology. Freeman is the greatest of the great.I am very proud and lucky of talking with him on several occasions.

Physics and maths equations are so beautiful and precise until they are found to be totally wrong! Dyson is smart enough to know our limitations.

Definitely one of my favorites !.. Freeman is so measured and careful but so clear.

Watched the entire episode of this interview, but I can always listen to him talk. Been one of my heroes for a very long time.

Freeman Dyson is one of the people the more you listen to the more you like people and like the world.

Very interestingly put towards the end - the acknowledgement that things, derived from the possibly autonomous mental world, exist but we lack the tools to grasp them. Beautiful indeed.

This is clearly where geniuses come to debate each other.

@cakeismtrader4227

4 жыл бұрын

chrisls75 Nothing to debate about you will come to know everything in the realm that we call time but after the physical.

One of the few academics who fostered individual thought and led me to believe we need a sense of humor to go with the thinking

Scientists of his caliber, with his degree of circumspect and reasoned thought, are increasingly hard to come by these days.

@johnsmith1474

4 жыл бұрын

Horseshit.

@984francis

4 жыл бұрын

Hmm. I think it's more about who the media choose to interview.

@christyjia8449

4 жыл бұрын

@@984francis Yeah, that's why I've never been a fan of NDT.

@ImperialGuardsman74

4 жыл бұрын

@@christyjia8449 Eh depends, Dyson was a bit of a unique one. He was one of the last great 20th century scientists. A man who knew Dirac and was friends with Feynman, and was a contemporary of Einstein at princeton ,and who cast his net wide and never stopped contributing to science. There really isn't another like him.

Great conversation.. We should be having more on the same subject, these laws are fundamental to our ability to look out at the vast Universe and claim "i exist that is why i am the witness". And from these laws emerge the universal constants which underline existence.

Of all the physicists I’ve had the pleasure of watching, Dyson is the only one I’ve seen who thought outside of Schrödinger’s box.

I like listening Dyson's and Weinberg's answers to the same questions. Both very humble, Weinberg being more confident on his thoughts. What a couple. I wonder if they ever worked together...

May God bless you sir

A wonderful and simple human mind...

That was the best and most articulate, accurate, simple, and beautiful description of the laws of physics I've ever heard in my life. Well done sir! Einstein seemed to focus on the physical, but I believe he followed Spinoza who thought God and nature were one, and mind and body were one.

Freeman Dyson is one of my hero's

I wish that all scientists had the same intelligent attitudes as he has....!!! Excellent.

it's hard for us to grasp just how tiny we are in comparison to the universe and beyond. I sometimes think we're like tiny ants who have been scrambling around our tiny patch of earth, and then one day an ant looked up and saw a tree, then others saw this tree, and that was like us seeing the true nature of things, but that's just one tree, imagine that ant climbing to the top and seeing thousands of other trees, and that was just in that little forest, the ant had no conception of the thousands of other forests which he couldn't see, and beyond that, he had no idea of the sheer enormity of the planet itself. Folks, ... it's big out there, ... very big !!

@biistful

5 жыл бұрын

Try and read "Micromegas", written by Voltaire. It is a novel, that circulates around a similar idea that U just presented

I've come to feel the same way about the great accomplishments of man. You look back at the unbelievable inventions of the 20th century and realize that it was mostly low hanging fruit. It's easy to be the smartest when there is no one to compare yourselves to. All the things that are truly spectacular for a hairless ape to build are really the doings of a super-organism, like a bee hive, where each little part only requires the limited intelligence of the smartest ape to do. We definitely seem to have plateaued by the end of that incredible century. Having spent most of my life in that past, I won't be here to see what wonders may come. Good luck my simian brothers and sisters.

Whether physics actually describes "reality" is a subject of controversy. Einstein thought that the laws of physics could provide such descriptions, but Niels Bohr disagreed with him and claimed "It is wrong to think that the task of physics is to find out how Nature is. Physics concerns what we say about Nature."

@MatthewJohnFaunce

4 жыл бұрын

Then Bohr was a nominalist and believed that reality is so separate from knowledge that it could have no influence on it. The belief in a reality that’s absolutely separate from knowledge is a useless surplussage in thought and should be cut off by Occam’s Razor. If all our knowledge is and could only be nominal then there is nothing that could bring about agreement. There could not even be agreement within one person’s own thoughts about a false idea. In fact, there could be no thought at all. Nominalistic philosophy has one, and only one use, and that is to challenge realist philosophers to better explain their position. Nominalism, as most educated Madhyamikas will tell you, is not a philosophical position but is a means to challenge the realists by using elements from the realist’s own position. However, Madhyamikas, and the rest of the nominalists, never offer an account for how it’s possible that they’re able to agree on a platform on which to argue. That’s their Achille’s heal.

I think there is a 'heaven' of some sorts because where the laws of physics come from is something that is beyond the laws of physics; therefore beyond us.

Excellent...... thanks 🙏.

God may turn out to disagree with me, as He often has in the past.

@vasilijeglusica7472

2 жыл бұрын

Albert Einsten and Nikola Tesla and Newton believed in God.

@mooooo1974

2 жыл бұрын

@@vasilijeglusica7472 Albert Einstein believed in an objective God, one seen in nature.. But it fits Roman's description of God that is seen in nature. Newton saw God as the masterful creator whose existence could not be denied in the face of the grandeur of all creation. Nevertheless, he rejected Leibniz's thesis that God would necessarily make a perfect world which requires no intervention from the creator.

Reality is refined over time. It's a continuous scientific process.

Rest in Peace.

I take note, from the comments below, that simpletons seek to compel others to speak and communicate as they do. The limits of ones language is the limits of ones world.

A Legend. Truly.

I think the most incredible thing about humans is their ability to continually overcomplicate things as if existence bows down to man. This is why people don't understand the simplicity of the laws of nature. The answers are simple but people will overlook. God sustains all of us, a simple and quite mysterious answer.

@abhay_r7068

5 жыл бұрын

It's easier to blame everything on 'GOD' than to take the time to think.

Imagination - Process of Pure Creation The process of creation starts with thought - an idea, conception, visualization. Everything you see was once someone's idea. Nothing exists in your world that did not first exist as pure thought. This is true of the universe as well. Thought is the first level of creation. Next comes the word. Everything you say is a thought expressed. It is creative and sends forth creative energy into the universe. Words are more dynamic (thus, some might say more creative) than thought, because words are a different level of vibration from thought. They disrupt (change, alter, affect) the universe with greater impact. Words are the second level of creation. Next comes action. Actions are words moving. Words are thoughts expressed. Thoughts are ideas formed. Ideas are energies come together. Energies are forces released. Forces are elements existent. Elements are particles of God, portions of ALL, the stuff of everything. The beginning is God. The end is action. Action is God creating - or God experienced. Hang on. There's one thing more I have to tell you. You are always seeing what by your terms you would define as the "past," even when you are looking at what is right in front of you. I am? It is impossible to see The Present. The Present "happens," then turns into a burst of light, formed by energy dispersing, and that light reaches your receptors, your eyes, and it takes time for it to do that. All the while the light is reaching you, life is going on, moving forward. The next event is happening while the light from the last event is reaching you. The energy burst reaches your eyes, your receptors send that signal to your brain, which interprets the data and tells you what you are seeing. Yet that is not what is now in front of you at all. It is what you think you are seeing. That is, you are thinking about what you have seen, telling yourself what it is, and deciding what you are going to call it, while what is happening "now" is preceding your process, and awaiting it. To put this simply, I am always one step ahead of you. My God, this is unbelievable. Now listen. The more distance you place between your Self and the physical location of any event, the further into the "past" that event recedes. Place yourself a few light-years back, and what you are looking at happened very, very long ago, indeed. Yet it did not happen "long ago." It is merely physical distance which has created the illusion of "time," and allowed you to experience your Self as being both "here, now" all the while you are being "there, then"! One day you will see that what you call time and space are the same thing. Then you will see that everything is happening right here, right now. This is....this is....wild. I mean, I don't know what to make of all this. When you understand what I have told you, you will understand that nothing you see is real. You are seeing the image of what was once an event, yet even that image, that energy burst, is something you are interpreting. Your personal interpretation of that image is called your image-ination. And you can use your imagination to create anything. Because - and here is the greatest secret of all - your image-ination works both ways. Please? You not only interpret energy, you create it. Imagination is a function of your mind, which is one-third of your three-part being. In your mind you image something, and it begins to take physical form. The longer you image it (and the more OF you who image it), the more physical that form becomes, until the increasing energy you have given it literally bursts into light, flashing an image of itself into what you call your reality. You then "see" the image, and once again decide what it is. Thus, the cycle continues. This is what I have called The Process. This is what YOU ARE. You ARE this Process. This is what I have meant when I have said, you are both the Creator and the Created. I have now brought it all together for you. We are concluding this dialogue, and I have explained to you the mechanics of the universe, the secret of all life. Okay. Now as energy coalesced, it becomes, as I said, very concentrated. But the further one moves from the point of this concentration, the more dissipated the energy becomes. The "air becomes thinner." The aura fades. The energy never completely disappears, because it cannot. It is the stuff of which everything is made. It's All There Is. Yet it can become very, very thin, very subtle - almost "not there." Then, in another place (read that, another part of Itself) it can again coalesce, once more "clumping together" to form what you call matter, and what "looks like" a discreet unit. Now the two units appear separate from each other, and in truth there is no separation at all. This is, in very, very simple and elementary terms, the explanation behind the whole physical universe. Wow. But can it be true? How do I know I haven't just made this all up? Your scientists are already discovering that the building blocks of all of life are the same. They brought back rocks from the moon and found the same stuff they find in trees. They take apart a tree and find the same stuff they find in you. I tell you this: We are all the same stuff. (I and the Father are One Energy) We are the same energy, coalesced, compressed in different ways to create different forms and different matter. Nothing "matters" in and of itself. That is, nothing can become matter all by itself. Jesus said, "Without the Father, I am nothing." The Father of all is pure thought. This is the energy of life. This is what you have chosen to call Absolute Love. This is the God and the Goddess, the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. It is the All-in-All, the Unmoved Mover, the Prime Source. It is that which you have sought to understand from the beginning of time. The Great Mystery, the Endless Enigma, the Eternal Truth. There is only One of Us, and so, it is THAT WHICH YOU ARE.

Love him

"God may turn out to disagree with me as He often has in the past."💯

@willnzsurf

4 жыл бұрын

😬

Yes, we are just a tiny part part of a process

its not "that nature does what the equations say" its that "the equations ONLY describe what nature does" and we certainly are going to discover/describe more of them given that previous works are NOT flawed or cater to men's ego's

I feel very related to Dyson, perhaps because I also don't have a PhD .. ;) What a beautiful, colorful human beeing he was.

The notion of Consciousness is steeped in mystery and debate, and although it is still generally considered to be human only, there are now schools of thought emerging that believe some animals have ‘consciousness’ as well. The idea that it is an attribute unique to us as human beings arises from the fact that we have an awareness of ourselves and the world we live in, unlike most or any of the other creatures. This awareness we have forms the basis of ‘the self’. The reason for our becoming self-conscious, or self-aware, creatures will become apparent later on, when we begin exploring the nature of being human in greater detail. But this human self-consciousness is something quite different in nature to the reality of the Consciousness that lies behind and within everything to appear as the myriad forms in existence. Consciousness inhabits and animates creation and its creatures not unlike the power that flows through a computer to make it work in accordance with the hardware and software of the device. By this analogy, the specific physical characteristics of a creature’s body constitute the hardware, and the programming of its mind the software. These things are important to understand because if this conceptual ground is not firm, the model we build from here will not endure, and its potential value will be lost. What all this is pointing to is that what you really are―what we all are―is an eternal, unlimited energy source capable of creating and experiencing events. What you are is this creative source, this Consciousness. Who you are is how this Consciousness works through you to express as something unique in the world. Powerful creative Consciousness is your true and essential nature, but of course, you experience your life through the limitations of a human body, so it may not seem that you are an all-powerful being at times, or indeed ever. By its very nature, the body exists as some ‘thing’ and is, therefore, a limitation or restriction of ‘everything else possible’, to become something specific and useful―a human being. And then it must be remembered that these bodies we inhabit are a product of Mother Earth, and have developed for good reasons. Although today there are many philosophes, theories and just sheer guesses put forward to explain the purpose of our existence, none of them fully describe or satisfactorily explain the original intention for our emergence. Some bodies born into this world have, or will develop over time, physical or mental attributes that further alter the creative opportunities and experiences available to them in a lifetime. The influence of our national culture, the general culture of our times, and the impact of our upbringing by parents and other significant people also become major influences that can place limitations on our thinking and power. Other restrictions occur as a result of the pains we might experience in life, the emotions that often get buried in the body as a result, and the accumulating limited beliefs they then give rise to. There is also the concept of ‘karmic debt’ that will limit opportunities, and this too will be discussed later in the work. The state of your own evolved Consciousness is another factor affecting personal power. All these things limit the opportunities you have in life, and so it can be seen that although your true nature is something quite grand, you find yourself in very limiting circumstances. But it is important to keep perspective. Your essential nature is a free and unlimited Consciousness, a potential capable of eternal creation and experience. And this Consciousness was the reality before the Universe that we know emerged. If God is reality, And if reality is consciousness, Then God is consciousness The Need to Create, Discover, and Explore. God becomes a creative source. He gave us our birthright of curiosity. He remains unknowable, but he unfolds one secret after another in creation. At the far edge of the universe, the unknown is a challenge and a source of wonder. God wants us not to worship but to evolve. Our role is to discover and explore. Nature exists to provide endless mysteries that challenge our intelligence - there is always more to discover. This is your God if you live to explore and be creative, if you feel happiest confronting the unknown, if you have total confidence that nature can be unraveled, including human nature, as long as we keep questioning and never settle for fixed, preordained truth. God becomes pure wonder. After reason has reached the limits of understanding, the mystery remains. Sages, saints, and the divinely inspired have penetrated it. They have felt a divine presence that transcends everyday life. Materialism is an illusion. Creation was fashioned in two layers, the visible and the invisible. Miracles become real when everything is a miracle. To reach God, one must accept the reality of invisible things. Nature is a mask for the divine. This is your God if you are a spiritual seeker. You want to know what lies behind the mask of materialism, to find the source of healing, to experience peace, and to be in direct contact with a divine presence. Unity, the State Beyond All Needs. God becomes One. There is complete fulfillment because you have reached the goal of seeking. You experience the divine everywhere. The last hint of separation has vanished. You have no need to divide saint from sinner, because God imbues everything. In this state, you don't know the truth; you become it. The universe and every event in it are expressions of a single underlying Being, which is pure awareness, pure intelligence, and pure creativity. Nature is the outward form that consciousness takes as it unfolds in time and space. This is your God if you feel totally connected to your soul and your source. Your consciousness has expanded to embrace a cosmic perspective. You see everything happening in the mind of God. The ecstasy of great mystics, who seem especially gifted or chosen, now becomes available to you, because you have fully matured spiritually. The God that brings the scheme to an end, God as One, is different from the others. He isn't a projection. He signifies a state of total certainty and wonder, and if you reach that state, you are no longer projecting. Every need has been fulfilled; the path has ended with reality itself.

Good

Divine Dichotomy - Conversation With God It's important to learn about Divine Dichotomy and understand it thoroughly if you are to live in our universe with grace. Divine Dichotomy holds that it is possible for two apparently contradictory truths to exist simultaneously in the same space. Now on your planet people find this difficult to accept. They like to have order, and anything that does not fit into their picture is automatically rejected. For this reason, when two realities begin to assert themselves and they seem to contradict one another, the immediate assumption is that one of them must be wrong, false, untrue. It takes a great deal of maturity to see, and accept, that, in fact, they might both be true. Yet in the realm of the absolute - as opposed to the realm of the relative, in which you live - it is very clear that the one truth which is All There Is sometimes produces an affect which, viewed in relative terms, looks like a contradiction. This is called a Divine Dichotomy, and it is a very real part of the human experience. And as I've said, it's virtually impossible to live gracefully without accepting this. One is always grumbling, angry, thrashing about, vainly seeking "justice," or earnestly trying to reconcile opposing forces which were never meant to be reconciled, but which, by the very nature of the tension between them, produce exactly the desired effect. The realm of the relative is, in fact, held together by such tensions. As an example, the tension between good and evil. In ultimate reality there is no such thing as good and evil. In the realm of the absolute, all there is is love. Yet in the realm of the relative you have created the experience of what you "call" evil, and you have done it for a very sound reason. You wanted to experience love, not just "know" that love is All There Is, and you cannot experience something when there is nothing else but that. And so, you created in your reality (and continue to do so every day) a polarity of good and evil, thus using one so that you might experience the other. And here we have a Divine Dichotomy - two seemingly contradictory truths existing simultaneously in the same place. Specifically: There is such a thing as good and evil. All there is is love. Thank You for explaining this to me. You've touched on this before, but thank You for helping me understand Divine Dichotomy even better. You're welcome. Now, as I said, the greatest Divine Dichotomy is the one we are looking at now. There is only One Being, and hence, only One Soul. And, there are many souls in the One Being. Here's how the Dichotomy works: You've just had it explained to you that there is no separation between souls. The soul is the energy of life that exists within and around (as the aura of) all physical objects. In a sense, it is that which is "holding" all physical objects in place. The "Soul of God" holds in the universe, the "soul of man" holds in each individual human body. The body is not a container, a "housing," for the soul; the soul is the container for the body. That's right. Yet there is no "dividing line" between souls - there is no place where "one soul" ends and "another" begins. And so, it is really one soul holding all bodies. Correct. Yet the one soul "feels like" a bunch of individual souls. Indeed it does - indeed I do - by design. Can You explain how it works? Yes. While there is no actual separation between souls, it is true that the stuff of which the One Soul is made manifest in physical reality at different speeds, producing different degrees of density. Different speeds? When did speed come in? All of life is a vibration. That which you call life (you could just as easily call it God) is pure energy. That energy is vibrating constantly, always. It is moving in waves. The waves vibrate at different speeds, producing different degrees of density, or light. This, in turn, produces what you would call different "effects" in the physical world - actually, different physical objects. Yet while the objects are different and discreet, the energy which produces them is exactly the same. Let Me go back to the example that you used of the air between your living room and dining room. It was a good use of imagery that just popped right out of you. An inspiration. From guess where. Yes, I gave it to you. Now you said that there was no specific place between those two physical locations where the "air of the living room" stopped and the "air of the dining room" began. And that is true. Yet there is a place where the "air of the lining room" becomes less dense. That is,vit dissipates, becomes "thinner." So, too, the "air of the dining room." The further from the dining room you go, the less you smell diner! Now the air in the house is the same air. There is no "separate air" in the dining room. Yet the air in the dining room sure seems like "other air." For one thing, it smells different! So because the air has taken on different characteristics, it seems as though it is different air. But it is not. It is all the same air, seeming different. In the living room you smell the fireplace, in the dining room you smell dinner. You might even go into one room and say, "Whew, it's stuffy. Let's get some air in here," as if there was no air at all. And yet, of course, there's plenty of air. What you are wanting to do is change its characteristics. So you bring in some from the outside. Yet that is the same air, too. There is only one air, moving in, around, and through everything. This is cool. I totally "get" this. I love the way You explain the universe to me in ways I can totally "get." Well, thank you. I'm trying here. So let Me go on. Please. Like the air in your house, the energy of life - what we'll call the "Soul of God" - takes on different characteristics as it surrounds different physical objects. Indeed, that energy coalesced in a particular way to form those objects. As particles of energy join together to form physical matter, they become very concentrated. Mashed up. Pushed together. They begin to "look like," even "feel like," distinct units. That is, they begin to seem "separate," different," from all the other energy. Yet this is all the same energy, behaving differently. It is this very act of behaving differently which makes it possible for That Which Is All to manifest as That Which Is Many. As I explained in Book 1, That Which Is could not experience Itself as What It Is until It developed this ability to differentiate. So That Which Is All separated into That Which Is This, and That Which Is That. (I'm trying to make this very simple now.) The "clumps of energy" which coalesced into discreet units that held in physical beings are what you have chosen to call "souls." The parts of Me that have become the lot of You are what We are talking about here. Thus, the Divine Dichotomy: There is only One of us. There are Many of us. KNOW THE TRUTH - SET YOURSELF FREE. Now I tell you this: Know the truth, and the truth shall set you free. There is no separation. Not from each other, not from God, and not from anything that is. This truth I will repeat over and over on these pages. This observation I will make again and again. Act as if you were separate from nothing, and no one, and you will heal your world tomorrow. This is the greatest secret of all time. It is the answer for which man has searched for millennia. It is the solution for which he has worked, the revelation for which he has prayed. Act as if you were separate from nothing, and you heal the world. Understand that it is about power with, not power over.

The ultimate Metaphysical question, indeed.

Can something like chemistry bridge the difference between mathematical description of physical things to a non-physical description using language?

I was going to comment, then I read the rest of the nonsense below. I didn't want to join it. So I did.

The Cambrian explosion was the most remarkable and puzzling event in the history of life.8 Equally puzzling, however, is how some invertebrate creature in the ancient ocean, with all its "hard parts" on the outside, managed to evolve into the first vertebrate -- that is, the first fish-- with its hard parts all on the inside. Yet the transition from spineless invertebrates to the first backboned fishes is still shrouded in mystery, and many theories abound.9 Other gaps are abundant, with no real transitional series anywhere. A very bitter opponent of creation science, paleontologist, Niles Eldredge, has acknowledged that there is little, if any, evidence of evolutionary transitions in the fossil record. Instead, things remain the same! It is a simple ineluctable truth that virtually all members of a biota remain basically stable, with minor fluctuations, throughout their durations. . . .10 So how do evolutionists arrive at their evolutionary trees from fossils of oganisms which didn't change during their durations? Fossil discoveries can muddle over attempts to construct simple evolutionary trees -- fossils from key periods are often not intermediates, but rather hodge podges of defining features of many different groups. . . . Generally, it seems that major groups are not assembled in a simple linear or progressive manner -- new features are often "cut and pasted" on different groups at different times.11 As far as ape/human intermediates are concerned, the same is true, although anthropologists have been eagerly searching for them for many years. Many have been proposed, but each has been rejected in turn. All that paleoanthropologists have to show for more than 100 years of digging are remains from fewer than 2000 of our ancestors. They have used this assortment of jawbones, teeth and fossilized scraps, together with molecular evidence from living species, to piece together a line of human descent going back 5 to 8 million years to the time when humans and chimpanzees diverged from a common ancestor.12 Anthropologists supplemented their extremely fragmentary fossil evidence with DNA and other types of molecular genetic evidence from living animals to try to work out an evolutionary scenario that will fit. But this genetic evidence really doesn't help much either, for it contradicts fossil evidence. Lewin notes that: The overall effect is that molecular phylogenetics is by no means as straightforward as its pioneers believed. . . . The Byzantine dynamics of genome change has many other consequences for molecular phylogenetics, including the fact that different genes tell different stories.13 Summarizing the genetic data from humans, another author concludes, rather pessimistically: Even with DNA sequence data, we have no direct access to the processes of evolution, so objective reconstruction of the vanished past can be achieved only by creative imagination.14 Since there is no real scientific evidence that evolution is occurring at present or ever occurred in the past, it is reasonable to conclude that evolution is not a fact of science, as many claim. In fact, it is not even science at all, but an arbitrary system built upon faith in universal naturalism. Actually, these negative evidences against evolution are, at the same time, strong positive evidences for special creation. They are, in fact, specific predictions based on the creation model of origins. Creationists would obviously predict ubiquitous gaps between created kinds, though with many varieties capable of arising within each kind, in order to enable each basic kind to cope with changing environments without becoming extinct. Creationists also would anticipate that any "vertical changes" in organized complexity would be downward, since the Creator (by definition) would create things correctly to begin with. Thus, arguments and evidences against evolution are, at the same time, positive evidences for creation.

☀️

Consciousness is the answer ! Its not about chance .

@magdadrague

3 жыл бұрын

God.

Wow

Genius

@ravencell2374

8 жыл бұрын

Undoubtedly so

Very interesting video!!! Maybe even consciousness is based on a physical process that can be explained by physics!

@kmanc8571

8 жыл бұрын

+An artist theory on the physics of 'Time' as a physical process. Quantum Atom Theory well.... that's a widely held opinion & I agree with it but that's not what he was saying... was it? wasn't he saying the opposite?

@m_christine1070

5 жыл бұрын

I think Max Tegmark made reference to what you're saying.

An honest acknowledgment "I am a fool in philosophy". Wisdom 11:20,2nd cent. B(efore)C(hrist) expresses it in one sentence: existence and order@and the cause of this order! For ex.Mr.Dawkins cannot answer a simple question: "Do you see light/ a photon? Rev. Aristotle from 4cent.BC would help on his...idiocy

Wonder if he ever read Heidegger, his argument crushed dualism for me.

Coexisting is a better term than competing when talking evolution

1 I saw the treasuries of all the winds: I saw how He had furnished with them the whole creation 2 and the firm foundations of the earth. And I saw the corner-stone of the earth: I saw the four 3 winds which bear [the earth and] the firmament of the heaven. And I saw how the winds stretch out the vaults of heaven, and have their station between heaven and earth: these are the pillars 4 of the heaven. I saw the winds of heaven which turn and bring the circumference of the sun and 5 all the stars to their setting. I saw the winds on the earth carrying the clouds: I saw the paths 6 of the angels. I saw at the end of the earth the firmament of the heaven above. And I proceeded and saw a place which burns day and night, where there are seven mountains of magnificent stones, 7 three towards the east, and three towards the south. And as for those towards the east, was of coloured stone, and one of pearl, and one of jacinth, and those towards the south of red stone. 8 But the middle one reached to heaven like the throne of God, of alabaster, and the summit of the 9,10 throne was of sapphire. And I saw a flaming fire. And beyond these mountains Is a region the end of the great earth: there the heavens were completed. And I saw a deep abyss, with columns of heavenly fire, and among them I saw columns of fire fall, which were beyond measure alike towards 12 the height and towards the depth. And beyond that abyss I saw a place which had no firmament of the heaven above, and no firmly founded earth beneath it: there was no water upon it, and no 13 birds, but it was a waste and horrible place. I saw there seven stars like great burning mountains, 14 and to me, when I inquired regarding them, The angel said: 'This place is the end of heaven and earth: this has become a prison for the stars and the host of heaven. And the stars which roll over the fire are they which have transgressed the commandment of the Lord in the beginning of 16 their rising, because they did not come forth at their appointed times. And He was wroth with them, and bound them till the time when their guilt should be consummated (even) for ten thousand years.' [Chapter 19] 1 And Uriel said to me: 'Here shall stand the angels who have connected themselves with women, and their spirits assuming many different forms are defiling mankind and shall lead them astray into sacrificing to demons as gods, (here shall they stand,) till the day of the great judgement in 2 which they shall be judged till they are made an end of. And the women also of the angels who 3 went astray shall become sirens.' And I, Enoch, alone saw the vision, the ends of all things: and no man shall see as I have seen. [Chapter 20] 1,2 And these are the names of the holy angels who watch. Uriel, one of the holy angels, who is 3 over the world and over Tartarus. Raphael, one of the holy angels, who is over the spirits of men. 4,5 Raguel, one of the holy angels who takes vengeance on the world of the luminaries. Michael, one 6 of the holy angels, to wit, he that is set over the best part of mankind and over chaos. Saraqael, 7 one of the holy angels, who is set over the spirits, who sin in the spirit. Gabriel, one of the holy 8 angels, who is over Paradise and the serpents and the Cherubim. Remiel, one of the holy angels, whom God set over those who rise. [Chapter 21] 1,2 And I proceeded to where things were chaotic. And I saw there something horrible: I saw neither 3 a heaven above nor a firmly founded earth, but a place chaotic and horrible. And there I saw 4 seven stars of the heaven bound together in it, like great mountains and burning with fire. Then 5 I said: 'For what sin are they bound, and on what account have they been cast in hither?' Then said Uriel, one of the holy angels, who was with me, and was chief over them, and said: 'Enoch, why 6 dost thou ask, and why art thou eager for the truth? These are of the number of the stars of heaven, which have transgressed the commandment of the Lord, and are bound here till ten thousand years, 7 the time entailed by their sins, are consummated.' And from thence I went to another place, which was still more horrible than the former, and I saw a horrible thing: a great fire there which burnt and blazed, and the place was cleft as far as the abyss, being full of great descending columns of 8 fire: neither its extent or magnitude could I see, nor could I conjecture. Then I said: 'How 9 fearful is the place and how terrible to look upon!' Then Uriel answered me, one of the holy angels who was with me, and said unto me: 'Enoch, why hast thou such fear and affright?' And 10 I answered: 'Because of this fearful place, and because of the spectacle of the pain.' And he said unto me: 'This place is the prison of the angels, and here they will be imprisoned for ever.' [Chapter 22] 1 And thence I went to another place, and he mountain [and] of hard rock. 2 And there was in it four hollow places, deep and wide and very smooth. How smooth are the hollow places and deep and dark to look at. 3 Then Raphael answered, one of the holy angels who was with me, and said unto me: 'These hollow places have been created for this very purpose, that the spirits of the souls of the dead should 4 assemble therein, yea that all the souls of the children of men should assemble here. And these places have been made to receive them till the day of their judgement and till their appointed period [till the period appointed], till the great judgement (comes) upon them.' I saw (the spirit of) a dead man making suit, 5 and his voice went forth to heaven and made suit. And I asked Raphael the angel who was 6 with me, and I said unto him: 'This spirit which maketh suit, whose is it, whose voice goeth forth and maketh suit to heaven ?' 7 And he answered me saying: 'This is the spirit which went forth from Abel, whom his brother Cain slew, and he makes his suit against him till his seed is destroyed from the face of the earth, and his seed is annihilated from amongst the seed of men.' 8 The I asked regarding it, and regarding all the hollow places: 'Why is one separated from the other?' 9 And he answered me and said unto me: 'These three have been made that the spirits of the dead might be separated. And such a division has been make (for) the spirits of the righteous, in which there is the bright spring of 10 water. And such has been made for sinners when they die and are buried in the earth and judgement has not been executed on them in their 11 lifetime. Here their spirits shall be set apart in this great pain till the great day of judgement and punishment and torment of those who curse for ever and retribution for their spirits. There 12 He shall bind them for ever. And such a division has been made for the spirits of those who make their suit, who make disclosures concerning their destruction, when they were slain in the days 13 of the sinners. Such has been made for the spirits of men who were not righteous but sinners, who were complete in transgression, and of the transgressors they shall be companions: but their spirits shall not be slain in the day of judgement nor shall they be raised from thence.' 14 The I blessed the Lord of glory and said: 'Blessed be my Lord, the Lord of righteousness, who ruleth for ever.

One gets only a slither of Dyson's empiricism. It's refreshing and disturbing...yet, worth being open to since it is almost scarily mapping to what he also feels it seems.

Whose statue is that on background? Von Neumann?

What we call the laws of nature are derived from observing nature. These observed laws - expressed as mathematical relationships - are our first effort to develop an understanding of how the natural world behaves. Later we may begin to suggest what possible mechanism might account for these laws, and go on to develop testable hypotheses to confirm or exclude the validity of the proposed mechanism. But laws are simply observed quantitative relationships. The universe provides the raw data, and if it's sufficiently obvious we formulate a law that describes it numerically. So far, there is no evidence to suggest that the laws came first, like a set of engineering specifications, and then the universe was built to satisfy those specs. Certainly that's one possible scenario, but we have no evidence for it. And it's quaintly anthropomorphic besides.

@arkarkooti19

Жыл бұрын

Laws of nature are derived from observing nature, which means nature is observing these laws. Laws can be derived from other more intrinsic laws, but this can't go on forever. At some point nature will be perfectly obey laws which means that laws must precede nature altogether. The laws must first exist before nature. This explains why nature obeys. What can possibly create laws other than intelligence? Within physics there are great signs of a Creator.

Whose head is it behind the professor?

@lowersaxon

3 жыл бұрын

Von Neumann, I think.

@andrewternet8370

3 жыл бұрын

Looks like Cicero

0:44 📚🧐...when one asks the right question: Can "complicated structures, where the details don't matter"..and, "...which you can't write down an equation for" , and"...it tells you roughly hows things go".."...and is characterized as some sort of an abstraction..." ...be called "Laws" - definitely ?.??

Why is the concept of descriptive vs prescriptive so often misunderstood or misappropriated

Where does information come from. I know only one place information comes from. Intelligence.

Consciousness and the laws of nature are all that is unchanging. Could it be that they are somehow one? Could there be only one law- that all must add up to zero?

[23] 1,2 From thence I went to another place to the west of the ends of the earth. And I saw a burning 3 fire which ran without resting, and paused not from its course day or night but (ran) regularly. And 4 I asked saying: 'What is this which rests not?' Then Raguel, one of the holy angels who was with me, answered me and said unto me: 'This course of fire which thou hast seen is the fire in the west which persecutes all the luminaries of heaven.' [Chapter 24] 1 And from thence I went to another place of the earth, and he showed me a mountain range of 2 fire which burnt day and night. And I went beyond it and saw seven magnificent mountains all differing each from the other, and the stones (thereof) were magnificent and beautiful, magnificent as a whole, of glorious appearance and fair exterior: three towards the east, one founded on the other, and three towards the south, one upon the other, and deep rough ravines, no one of which 3 joined with any other. And the seventh mountain was in the midst of these, and it excelled them 4 in height, resembling the seat of a throne: and fragrant trees encircled the throne. And amongst them was a tree such as I had never yet smelt, neither was any amongst them nor were others like it: it had a fragrance beyond all fragrance, and its leaves and blooms and wood wither not for ever: 5 and its fruit is beautiful, and its fruit n resembles the dates of a palm. Then I said: 'How beautiful is this tree, and fragrant, and its leaves are fair, and its blooms very delightful in appearance.' 6 Then answered Michael, one of the holy and honoured angels who was with me, and was their leader. [Chapter 25] 1 And he said unto me: 'Enoch, why dost thou ask me regarding the fragrance of the tree, 2 and why dost thou wish to learn the truth?' Then I answered him saying: 'I wish to 3 know about everything, but especially about this tree.' And he answered saying: 'This high mountain which thou hast seen, whose summit is like the throne of God, is His throne, where the Holy Great One, the Lord of Glory, the Eternal King, will sit, when He shall come down to visit 4 the earth with goodness. And as for this fragrant tree no mortal is permitted to touch it till the great judgement, when He shall take vengeance on all and bring (everything) to its consummation 5 for ever. It shall then be given to the righteous and holy. Its fruit shall be for food to the elect: it shall be transplanted to the holy place, to the temple of the Lord, the Eternal King. 6 Then shall they rejoice with joy and be glad, And into the holy place shall they enter; And its fragrance shall be in their bones, And they shall live a long life on earth, Such as thy fathers lived: And in their days shall no sorrow or plague Or torment or calamity touch them.' 7 Then blessed I the God of Glory, the Eternal King, who hath prepared such things for the righteous, and hath created them and promised to give to them. [Chapter 26] 1 And I went from thence to the middle of the earth, and I saw a blessed place in which there were 2 trees with branches abiding and blooming [of a dismembered tree]. And there I saw a holy mountain, 3 and underneath the mountain to the east there was a stream and it flowed towards the south. And I saw towards the east another mountain higher than this, and between them a deep and narrow 4 ravine: in it also ran a stream underneath the mountain. And to the west thereof there was another mountain, lower than the former and of small elevation, and a ravine deep and dry between them: and another deep and dry ravine was at the extremities of the three mountains. And all the ravines were deep and narrow, (being formed) of hard rock, and trees were not planted upon 6 them. And I marveled at the rocks, and I marveled at the ravine, yea, I marveled very much. [Chapter 27] 1 Then said I: 'For what object is this blessed land, which is entirely filled with trees, and this 2 accursed valley between?' Then Uriel, one of the holy angels who was with me, answered and said: 'This accursed valley is for those who are accursed for ever: Here shall all the accursed be gathered together who utter with their lips against the Lord unseemly words and of His glory speak hard things. Here shall they be gathered together, and here 3 shall be their place of judgement. In the last days there shall be upon them the spectacle of righteous judgement in the presence of the righteous for ever: here shall the merciful bless the Lord of glory, the Eternal King. 4 In the days of judgement over the former, they shall bless Him for the mercy in accordance with 5 which He has assigned them (their lot).' Then I blessed the Lord of Glory and set forth His glory and lauded Him gloriously. [Chapter 28] 1 And thence I went towards the east, into the midst of the mountain range of the desert, and 2 I saw a wilderness and it was solitary, full of trees and plants. And water gushed forth from 3 above. Rushing like a copious watercourse [which flowed] towards the north-west it caused clouds and dew to ascend on every side. [Chapter 29] 1 And thence I went to another place in the desert, and approached to the east of this mountain 2 range. And there I saw aromatic trees exhaling the fragrance of frankincense and myrrh, and the trees also were similar to the almond tree. [Chapter 30] 1,2 And beyond these, I went afar to the east, and I saw another place, a valley (full) of water. And 3 therein there was a tree, the colour (?) of fragrant trees such as the mastic. And on the sides of those valleys I saw fragrant cinnamon. And beyond these I proceeded to the east. [Chapter 31] 1 And I saw other mountains, and amongst them were groves of trees, and there flowed forth from 2 them nectar, which is named sarara and galbanum. And beyond these mountains I saw another mountain to the east of the ends of the earth, whereon were aloe-trees, and all the trees were full 3 of stacte, being like almond-trees. And when one burnt it, it smelt sweeter than any fragrant odour. [Chapter 32] 1 And after these fragrant odours, as I looked towards the north over the mountains I saw seven mountains full of choice nard and fragrant trees and cinnamon and pepper. 2 And thence I went over the summits of all these mountains, far towards the east of the earth, and passed above the Erythraean sea and went far from it, and passed over the angel Zotiel. And I came to the Garden of Righteousness, 3 I and from afar off trees more numerous than I these trees and great-two trees there, very great, beautiful, and glorious, and magnificent, and the tree of knowledge, whose holy fruit they eat and know great wisdom. 4 That tree is in height like the fir, and its leaves are like (those of) the Carob tree: and its fruit 5 is like the clusters of the vine, very beautiful: and the fragrance of the tree penetrates afar. Then 6 I said: 'How beautiful is the tree, and how attractive is its look!' Then Raphael the holy angel, who was with me, answered me and said: 'This is the tree of wisdom, of which thy father old (in years) and thy aged mother, who were before thee, have eaten, and they learnt wisdom and their eyes were opened, and they knew that they were naked and they were driven out of the garden.' [Chapter 33] 1 And from thence I went to the ends of the earth and saw there great beasts, and each differed from the other; and (I saw) birds also differing in appearance and beauty and voice, the one differing from the other. And to the east of those beasts I saw the ends of the earth whereon the heaven 2 rests, and the portals of the heaven open. And I saw how the stars of heaven come forth, and 3 I counted the portals out of which they proceed, and wrote down all their outlets, of each individual star by itself, according to their number and their names, their courses and their positions, and their 4 times and their months, as Uriel the holy angel who was with me showed me. He showed all things to me and wrote them down for me: also their names he wrote for me, and their laws and their companies. [Chapter 34] 1 And from thence I went towards the north to the ends of the earth, and there I saw a great and 2 glorious device at the ends of the whole earth. And here I saw three portals of heaven open in the heaven: through each of them proceed north winds: when they blow there is cold, hail, frost, 3 snow, dew, and rain. And out of one portal they blow for good: but when they blow through the other two portals, it is with violence and affliction on the earth, and they blow with violence.

It is time we congratulate big thinkers outside of mainstream science.

Both worlds are the same, fractally and magnelectricly connected. This is what is meant by all is one. It's a literal description and explanation of everything. And yes, physics is way off the mark. Yes, we do have the tools in Ken Wheeler's primer on magnetism.

I always think of him when watching Terminator 2

The laws are not independent of mind , the laws are inherent laws of logic ( mathematics) so its inevitable that there is a mind behind the universe.

@dapperkev1395

3 жыл бұрын

Well said

Laws by them selves do absolutely nothing other than describe with predictability physical processes they do not explain the origin of the processes!

he is a wise man , on the other hand u can choose to listen to raging ppl in the comment who take their fingers out their asses and put them in their ears everytime they hear something that may prove god.

It can be useful to substitute "neuroscience" for the term "mental world". Every neuroscientest that I'm familiar with readily concedes that neuroscience is at a very early stage with many more unanswered questions than proven theorems. V.S. Ramachandran is a wonderful neuroscientist to read, and one who is not unfamiliar with eastern philosophy, particularly Indian. Deepak Chopra is a charlatan, neither scientest nor especially coherent about any eastern religion/philosophy.

One may suspect most commenters don't have a consciousness

how to live with tones of unanswered questions?

@lsdap1969

4 жыл бұрын

Have you tried hedonism?

@unknownchannel3141

4 жыл бұрын

lsdap1969 yes. But epicurianism works better.

@mahakala

4 жыл бұрын

@@lsdap1969 pleasure makes man even more miserable in the end. try and see for yourself.

@ImperialGuardsman74

4 жыл бұрын

I think you say what Dyson said some times.... That science would get boring without unanswered questions, and that he hopes humans aren't close to answering the universe.

Kind of annoying in all these videos that the question in the title is rarely addressed.

❤️😌💓💪

Do the laws of nature not able to describe mathematically indicate the presence of something outside the physical world?

and they run when the sun comes up

On February 28th 2020 mathematician freeman Dyson passed away

When he says "lots of evidence outside the scope of physics", what exactly is he talking about?

@bacchusaurelius

8 жыл бұрын

+anywherein12seconds No, he doesn't oppose man-made global warming. He's said that we don't sufficiently understand climatology to support the level of hysteria that exists on the topic of global warming. That's a perfectly scientific viewpoint.

@luckyyuri

8 жыл бұрын

bacchusaurelius ok. but was this earth in any need for that!? his words were a huge incentive for the mindless and their stance. he is a mature vaccinated person and i believe (might be wrong) that he has made a huge detrimental impact on this earth, enough to erase all scientific good that he might have generated.

@kmanc8571

8 жыл бұрын

+anywherein12seconds who are you to say that? it's always good to be honest. he shoudln't have to lie about his views just to prevent random idiots from taking what he says and running with it.

@kevinfairweather3661

8 жыл бұрын

Look up Dean Radin and its probably shit like that..

@esraeloh8681

7 жыл бұрын

He does not oppose the idea of human climate change, on the contrary, why are people on the internet so simple when it comes to these big people???? They are so specific with their language, sometimes lazy because the opinion of people out here who just argue don't matter. Where did you get that idea from?

If you would like to stop speculating about having a better understanding of our universe, and you would like to actually have it, I can sell it to you, guaranteed, for its fair value. You can find my videos using the search keywords: matter theory marostica.

we do have the tools to interpret and measure the 'mental' world. It's just that we don't trust them. Our body's wisdom, intuition, dreams, synchronicity and more. These are the tools.

@PicturesJester

4 жыл бұрын

We dot trust them cause we have good reason not too

The laws of nature are based on FACTS and a fact is an indisputable series of observations of the same phenomenon... FACT has never been repudiate by another fact, fiction, conjecture, legal fiction or fairy-tale...

@ImperialGuardsman74

4 жыл бұрын

As measured and documented by a small number of observer types in a few centuries. Who knows what a more advanced mind can say and observe. Thats my hope for AI. That they can think and perceive in ways we cant and answer questions.

What is the philosophical meaning of.. "They don't represent the real reality"?

Colossians 1:16 - 1:17 16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: 17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.

Rip

RLK try as he might can never undermine the views of an intelligent and humble scientist.

The laws of nature, is a consequence of eternal principles. The so called evolution, is also based on the Circuit-Princip, (Developing-Circuits)

2 Peter 3:13 But according to his promise we are waiting for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells. Isaiah 24:1-23 Behold, the Lord will empty the earth and make it desolate, and he will twist its surface and scatter its inhabitants. And it shall be, as with the people, so with the priest; as with the slave, so with his master; as with the maid, so with her mistress; as with the buyer, so with the seller; as with the lender, so with the borrower; as with the creditor, so with the debtor. The earth shall be utterly empty and utterly plundered; for the Lord has spoken this word. The earth mourns and withers; the world languishes and withers; the highest people of the earth languish. The earth lies defiled under its inhabitants; for they have transgressed the laws, violated the statutes, broken the everlasting covenant. ... Revelation 20:9 And they marched up over the broad plain of the earth and surrounded the camp of the saints and the beloved city, but fire came down from heaven and consumed them, Matthew 24:35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away. 1 Corinthians 3:13 Each one's work will become manifest, for the Day will disclose it, because it will be revealed by fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. Revelation 21:1-27 Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no more. And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, “Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God. He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away.” And he who was seated on the throne said, “Behold, I am making all things new.” Also he said, “Write this down, for these words are trustworthy and true.” ... Genesis 9:11 I establish my covenant with you, that never again shall all flesh be cut off by the waters of the flood, and never again shall there be a flood to destroy the earth.” Revelation 21:8 But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death.” Isaiah 51:6 Lift up your eyes to the heavens, and look at the earth beneath; for the heavens vanish like smoke, the earth will wear out like a garment, and they who dwell in it will die in like manner; but my salvation will be forever, and my righteousness will never be dismayed. Isaiah 34:4 All the host of heaven shall rot away, and the skies roll up like a scroll. All their host shall fall, as leaves fall from the vine, like leaves falling from the fig tree. Luke 17:29 But on the day when Lot went out from Sodom, fire and sulfur rained from heaven and destroyed them all- Matthew 24:1-51 Jesus left the temple and was going away, when his disciples came to point out to him the buildings of the temple. But he answered them, “You see all these, do you not? Truly, I say to you, there will not be left here one stone upon another that will not be thrown down.” As he sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things be, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?” And Jesus answered them, “See that no one leads you astray. For many will come in my name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and they will lead many astray. ...

Where is the equation for life?

@summerrr1

4 жыл бұрын

Peepee + Vagina = Little Jonny

sphere

All laws of nature as physics come or emerge as special cases from mathematics. In this sense, physics including engineering is nothing but applied mathematics.

Math and its equations are simply another way to "describe" a thing. They do not tell us how or why the thing is as it is.

@sdlillystone

Жыл бұрын

Not true I say that as a mathematician. Maxweell's equation even explain wht the speed of light is an absolute and takes it specific value.

@sdlillystone

Жыл бұрын

Maxwell's

@woofie8647

Жыл бұрын

@@sdlillystone Why is the speed of light absolute and why it's value? Math does not explain these things, nor does it explain how it got that way. It simply says, "The speed of light is this, and this equation describes it and it's relationship to what we see." Math is a language of sorts, representing what we see just as the word "dog" represents a thing we see. As in math, the word dog tells us nothing about why and how that dog works. It's a very simple analogy but goes deeper than we believe. 2+2=4 can be thought of as a sentence in math, telling us only that "2+2=4".

Often, I find myself defending how equivocal the word "Law" is used by theists... it's quite frustrating.

God is not a human being that God(not He or She) should agree or disagree ha! Bad explanation/philosophy i learned from David Deutsch. What a fine man this Freeman Dyson.

Wait but you can write down an equation for evolution wym

I have found Freeman to be a very smart, wise individual with a lot of good ideas and observances but alas when it comes to heavy questions such as this since he apparently does not believe in God his best answer to this would be to shrug his shoulders and say “ I dunno “

@peterlatourette3547

9 ай бұрын

He does believe in God and in the Divinity of Christ (Templeton award speech 2000)

But in quantum world the consciousness plays its role! We somehow create the world as it is in our minds. Why deny it?

"Some how nature knew that " ??????

Einstein mentioned about God is completely different approach to the way of looking at God, there is no such things as supernatural as we see in superhuman movies or Gods of Abrahamic faith, it's just a metaphor for describing the mysteries of the natural world and longing to explore the truth

@krzysztofciuba271

3 жыл бұрын

Einstein's god is Deist/Aristotelian first mover; he was a fool in classic philosophy and had any clue on the hermeneutics of any text, also Bible)- he is perfectly sure about this "First Mover"; consequently he@his physicists company could not explain some so called "paradoxes" of its own physics(Schrodinger cat,twin's aging)

Am I the only one confused here. He didn't actually give any theory as to where the laws came from, or how they came about.

How can someone so smart and so old not realise that everything we experience is material and determined. There is no "mental world" where magic happens. That is PURE COPING