Freeman Dyson - Attempts to make quantum electrodynamics into a completely solvable theory (92/157)

Ғылым және технология

To listen to more of Freeman Dyson’s stories, go to the playlist: • Freeman Dyson (Scientist)
Freeman Dyson (1923-2020), who was born in England, moved to Cornell University after graduating from Cambridge University with a BA in Mathematics. He subsequently became a professor and worked on nuclear reactors, solid state physics, ferromagnetism, astrophysics and biology. He published several books and, among other honours, was awarded the Heineman Prize and the Royal Society's Hughes Medal. [Listener: Sam Schweber; date recorded: 1998]
TRANSCRIPT: This was a grand programme. I had the ambition of making quantum electrodynamics into a completely solvable theory, a theory in which one could calculate everything precisely, in which all the renormalisations would be done, out of the way, and you'd have a convergent series so that it was not just an asymptotic expansion but a real convergent series, so it would be a mathematically well-defined theory and everything could be done in principle as accurately as you want. So I sat down and tried to do that, and the tactic that I developed was to separate high and low frequencies, or high and low energies, so that you'd first of all systematically go through a power... series expansion in the high frequencies only, which would be convergent, and so therefore could be, in principle, calculated rigorously. And so once the high frequencies had been done all the renormalisations would be out of the way. The remainder of the problem would just be ordinary physics, the low frequencies which would not present any problems in principle; it would just be a matter then of hard work to find the solutions of things, like the hydrogen atom where you'd have to deal with the low frequencies numerically. So essentially the programme was to do the high frequencies analytically, and the low frequencies numerically. Well, it failed, and I put two years very hard work into it. It was a more concentrated period of hard work, in fact, than I ever did on anything else. I think I worked really with high concentration for about two years, which I've never really done on any other project that I was involved with. And I thought it would actually succeed. I published four papers in which various stages or the programme were gone through and it seemed to work well; from a formal point of view everything worked. I was able to reduce the Schrödinger equation and the Heisenberg operators into the form which I thought would make them convergent and so as far as the formalities were concerned, everything seemed to work. And so those were done. All that remained was actually to prove the convergence. And then, when I was in Switzerland in the summer of 1951, the moment of truth happened: I suddenly found a very simple argument which showed that the series are divergent anyway, and no matter what you do, whether you separate high and low frequencies or not, the perturbation series in quantum electrodynamics simply diverges, and the argument to show that is a simply physical argument which is published in a one page note in the Physical Review letters. So that was the end of the story and that particular illumination was in a way a very joyful time. I mean, because suddenly I had this burden lifted, that the programme was a failure, I didn't have to think about it any more; that chapter of my life was over. In a way I suddenly felt a sense of enormous relief, that I wasn't having to fight this monster any more, which had gone on for two years and it was obviously something that would remain beyond my reach, and that was it. So in a way it was a great success although it was also a failure. At least it showed that was a dead end but in the course of reaching the dead end I found out something about quantum field theory which was important, namely the fact that the perturbation theory really does diverge.

Пікірлер: 22

  • @NothingMaster
    @NothingMaster3 жыл бұрын

    The fact that he finally realized that the perturbation series in QED simply diverges, in due course, led to his contributions on extending the renormalization techniques (initially developed in QED to deal with the infinite integrals in perturbation theory) to QFT; hence saving particle physics in the process. A huge triumph that eventually emerged out of an apparent failure.

  • @markoalling6352

    @markoalling6352

    Жыл бұрын

    Save particle physics? are you nuts? An increasingly complex string of fudge factors is not helping anyone. Thank satan the G-2 showed us what we already knew in 1952 and we can focus on building a solid theory instead of the ramshackle structure that is QFT

  • @sdwone

    @sdwone

    Жыл бұрын

    Well... Now that we have anomalies with the muon, suggests that this story is FAR from complete! So I wouldn't go blowing our horn yet! Physics still has a LOT of loopholes yet to be resolved!

  • @raminagrobis6112
    @raminagrobis61124 жыл бұрын

    Such honesty and rigor, combined with the humility of a really brilliant mind. Always a refreshing feeling to follow Dyson's autobiographical footnotes...

  • @readynowforever3676

    @readynowforever3676

    4 жыл бұрын

    feodoric Imagine if political figures could be this honest...I suppose they’d never win an election 😀

  • 4 жыл бұрын

    At this age and he is fluently speaking about the kind of physics that very few people understand /kowtow

  • @oraculox
    @oraculox3 жыл бұрын

    I think that from an early age we are taught to put confidence in front of fact. When it should be taught that confidence is a floating thing. Doubt always leads to better results. It teaches to always be analitic.

  • @EugeneJeong
    @EugeneJeong3 ай бұрын

    It is done. Full QED QCD potentials have been found. Consequently quark confinement within QCD and delta function potential in QED are explained.

  • @HBC423
    @HBC4237 жыл бұрын

    a true genius

  • @grahamblack1961
    @grahamblack19614 жыл бұрын

    He seems to have been an intellectual butterfly.

  • @DavidAKZ

    @DavidAKZ

    3 жыл бұрын

    He did not have a PhD

  • @greensombrero3641
    @greensombrero3641 Жыл бұрын

    Once it's in the hands of God (of whatever form) it's lifted from our shoulders

  • @rajeev_kumar
    @rajeev_kumar3 жыл бұрын

    This is amazing..

  • @benheideveld4617
    @benheideveld4617 Жыл бұрын

    To prove something in math or to disprove it are equivalent results, but not equivalent achievements. If Wiles would have found a counter example or proven that a counter example must exist, he would have forever refuted Fermat’s final theorem. But the fact the he proved it, and especially the way he did it, is a way bigger achievement than if Wiles would have proven it impossible to be proven.

  • @djtan3313
    @djtan33134 жыл бұрын

    A Great Soul

  • @pokeman123451
    @pokeman1234514 жыл бұрын

    this problem requires a mix of euler, gauss, dirac, and feynman. that would be a fun room to be in...

  • @delprice3007
    @delprice30075 жыл бұрын

    Thank God the balasportal tanks didn't explode when the spurnboreum was added.

  • @bassamxp
    @bassamxp4 жыл бұрын

    RIP Freeman. QED is beautiful theory except for the perturbation. It would've been great acheivment if Freeman succeeded in finding exact solution for qed

  • @rajeev_kumar

    @rajeev_kumar

    3 жыл бұрын

    There can't be any exact solution because theory itself is wrong..

  • @bassamxp

    @bassamxp

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@rajeev_kumar Why wrong? Theory is capable of predicting major physical quantities and calculate the cross section of fundamental interaction to a high accuracy.

  • @bassamxp

    @bassamxp

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@rajeev_kumar The theory certainly doesn't cover the whole bed but it can be used for doing calculations.

  • @koenraad4618
    @koenraad46182 жыл бұрын

    So, QED is wrong, since the theory leads to infinite values. Consa proved that the so called high precision QED ‘“prediction”’ of the gyromagnetic ratio is a complete scam. Btw, QED predicts that the velocity of the Coulomb near field is infinitely high, and this disproves Maxwell’s classical theory of the Coulomb field that describes the velocity of the Coulomb field as ‘c’. So QED demands an adaptation of Classical ELectrodynamics, but a CED theory describing infinite Coulomb field velocity no longer has potential functions “gauge freedom”, and this ruins the renormalisation trick, since it mathematically depends on ‘gauge freedom’ and gauge conditions. QED belongs in the dustbin of overhyped theories.

Келесі