Phew, that really was a session! I have watched it twice now and learned so much. Thank you.

@MangoJellySolutions

3 ай бұрын

That's great news, I want to do more focusing on how to break down a physical object to get into CAD similar to my CAD thinking series as its a skill in itself. I am glad you learnt alot from the video. And thank you for feeding back.

Watched it all. Amazing what you can do with FreeCAD. Thanks for all your great videos!

@MangoJellySolutions

2 ай бұрын

Glad you're enjoying, it's great to spread the knowledge of what I know to help others.

I feel like this video has leveled me up quite a bit. Thank you very much!

@MangoJellySolutions

3 ай бұрын

You're very welcome, Glad to share the knowledge 😊😊👍👍

Well done. A surface modeling in freecad classic video from the master. Thank you!

@MangoJellySolutions

3 ай бұрын

Wow, thanks! 😊😊😁😁 Glad you enjoyed, revisiting the surfacing with a new ideas so you may enjoy the rest.

Thank you. Love your videos.

That was a great tutorial, so many tips learned!

@MangoJellySolutions

3 ай бұрын

I be doing a number in the same style, glad you enjoyed and thank you.

Quite a nice video. Really helped me understand the surface workflow and potential topology issues. Thanks!

@MangoJellySolutions

3 ай бұрын

Thank you for feeding back, I always find that when my CAD teacher used to explain how to look at a object and mentally dismantle them it will always was a fascinating journey. To honour his contribution to my learning I would like to pass on those skills to others. Thank you so much for the kind comments.

Thank you very much. I follow your lessons, Hi everyone from Istanbul, TURKEY. My best regards.

@MangoJellySolutions

3 ай бұрын

Great to hear, and a hi from the UK. Hope you enjoy the upcoming videos 😊😊

@bilgekurthan

3 ай бұрын

@@MangoJellySolutions which city in UK. 🤗

One of your best efforts! Very nice topology matching explanation and management of the tree across multiple workbenches.

@MangoJellySolutions

3 ай бұрын

Thank you for the feedback, glad you enjoyed. I am looking to make more videos like this with a deeper explanation.

Thak you very much! I've learned a lot from you!

@MangoJellySolutions

3 ай бұрын

My pleasure, great to hear that 😊😊👍👍

Thank you Darren - learned a whole lotta new stuff from this one video! Will be a great reference when I need to do something similar.

@MangoJellySolutions

3 ай бұрын

Great to hear! 😊👍

Thanks a lot, great one.

@MangoJellySolutions

3 ай бұрын

You are welcome!

An interesting tutorial where the main focus in on a Project, compared to detailing the use of a particular tool. When one reaches a certain level of ability with FreeCAD, then a higher viewpoint of using a combination of tools really helps overcome the points were errors often creep in. It would be interesting to see a "Part 2" where the end product is a shell with a uniform thickness (rather than a solid) to give an enclosed space which would contain the electronics - that clips together to give the overall shape.

Incredible. Never can do it be myself. Great tutorial 🙂

@MangoJellySolutions

3 ай бұрын

Thank you, lots more to come 😊😊

Cool stuff, thank you.

Your videos are all great. Thank you for another!

@MangoJellySolutions

3 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful and thank you for the kind comment.

Hello Again Darren, thought I could do with some Surface Revision. I'm able to create mostly what I desire but having some issues creating appropriate surfaces. This was most informative especially the Cloning and Manipulation of Profiles to achieve a desired result. Especially enlightening was matching the Profiles to ensure smooth transition. Can You recommend a guide to the various Object Types in Free CAD? I think some of my issues are a result of trying to apply operations (i.e. Surfacing to incompatible Surfaces Edges)? So much to absorb but as always enjoy your Tutelage.

This is blackmagic and thank you greatly for this!!!

@MangoJellySolutions

3 ай бұрын

Been wanting to do this series of videos for a while, they're not as popular as some of the others but I am keeping going with them whilst at the same time planning something else. Glad your enjoying 😊

@blaccteezy

3 ай бұрын

@@MangoJellySolutions man this makes what I can think up but can’t see a way forward possible. The matching edges would’ve stopped my in my tracks. Thank you greatly!! Keep them coming please sir.

This time I wanted to try with version 0.22Dev and everything worked perfectly completing the tutorial. It is difficult to conceive the operations necessary to create the object, perhaps once you enter the logic of the software it will be easier. I continue training. Thank you.

@MangoJellySolutions

3 ай бұрын

The knowledge will come in time and I am going to put more focus on this type of modeling to help people understand how to get real world objects into CAD. Glad you enjoyed the video.

Beautiful technique with this mix of workshops. Personally, just after creating the Base Feature under Body, I couldn't break through under Part Design. I have an error message and the part disappears. I tried with Parts and I can't extrude inwards.

Always a brilliant process watching you work. I, however, am having no luck with Curves, can't get my curves workbench working on my Windows machine. It is giving me a Python error. I couldn't get sketch on surface to work, not even on a simple cylinder face. Makes it difficult to place text on a round surface. So, I reverted to doing it the hard way. Also, I'm see some of the redundant constraints as you were. Strange.

@superdau

3 ай бұрын

I've used the curves workbench several times under Windows (especially the sketch on surface function) and it worked fine. But I also managed to mess up some tries, for example when trying to map an existing sketch, as "sketch on surface" is a bit picky when it comes to support and placement. You have to make sure that the "Support" of the sketch is the face you want to map it on to. So yes, it isn't hassle free and the error messages aren't helpful. One of the typical redundant constraints with arcs is if you "coincide" their centers, "equal" their radius, but then also "coincide" rim points. If you do that you have essentially defined the radius of an arc in two different ways.

@stewartpalmer2456

3 ай бұрын

@@superdau I will continue to try using it. I'm sure it is something simple I'm over looking.

@jimbrookhyser

3 ай бұрын

One thing to try: if you get a redundant constraint error after making two points coincident, try to undo, and then instead enforce either a horizontal or vertical constraint for the two points (whichever seems more appropriate).

make airpod case also

Seems didn’t define the tangent or curvature between the surfaces. The party couldn’t good