Start your free 7 day trial with Blinkist and get 25% off of a Premium membership: www.blinkist.com/kingsandgenerals!

@trinoyliniray1336

2 жыл бұрын

"Whoever kills an innocent human being,it shall be as if he has killed all mankind,and whoever saves the life of one,it shall be as if he has saved the life of the whole mankind." Quran-Chapter -5(Verse--32) .Quran tells to kill and fight only with those non-muslims who try to kill muslims first and try to capture the land of muslims..And if possible they should be forgiven according to Quran..Ask a real islamic scholar.

@hitachi4264

2 жыл бұрын

This period of the caliphate is the most complicated for me

@Omer1996E.C

2 жыл бұрын

Finally, after being late for 2 months from the time you promised us that you'll upload it

@aahmed2426

2 жыл бұрын

Impressive keep it up 👍

@pejuangagamaislam2232

2 жыл бұрын

History empire andalusia War

As a Muslim it’s so refreshing to listen to commentary on these events in a political context. Growing up as either Sunni or Shia, you are taught to see your side as completely blameless and the other side evil. But in real life, all humans make mistakes and no one is completely innocent. Thanks to this channel! 🙏

@ivokantarski6220

2 жыл бұрын

That's the work of propaganda. Every country and every side has to convince its followers or citizens that their actions are right and just. For everything there is a justification. The enemy on other hand would also write history in their perspective and interest.

@c0detearz320

2 жыл бұрын

@@ivokantarski6220 both sides of major wars since Napoleon days be funded by the same people, it's best in this day and age for all people to not be tricked into war of good Vs evil

@ydel1234

2 жыл бұрын

@@mrright9437 THANK YOU!!!!!! I can’t believe how many Muslims will listen to this and believe this BS. Sure somethings he says are true, but most arent. Thalha, Zubayr,Ali and Uthman were from the 10 given the glad tidings of Jenna, but we have a boat load of Muslims that want to believe they cared about power and were afraid of losing influence etc. unbelievable. How bout reading Islamic books of history. Too lazy? Cool, then how bout listening to a Muslim scholar who spent years studying these events instead of a secularist who googled most of this info.

@furqanmk

2 жыл бұрын

@@mrright9437 What makes you think that atheists or non-Muslims always have an ulterior motive? He is merely stating what historians recorded, Muslims and non-Muslims, Sunni and Shia. Oftentimes when you hear the story of all sides you find that truth lies somewhere in the middle.

@furqanmk

2 жыл бұрын

@@mrright9437 Ok. Then let me ask you this. Which sources would you have me believe, Sunni or Shia?

No castle, no army, just a man sitting in his home governor of the strongest country of middle east, such a unique time that was

@zccau2316

2 жыл бұрын

crazy to think right

@resentfuldragon

2 жыл бұрын

@علي ياسر this was before the ummayyads though, thats why the comment was made. The rashidun caliphs were not living lavishly and were in normal houses like other people.

@khalidsaiv6613

2 жыл бұрын

Even the caliph (equal to king) live in a simple houses in this early caliphate periods. No castle, no kingsguard

@georgeso4364

2 жыл бұрын

And it’s insane how Muawiyah, son of the woman that hated Mohammed the most (Hind) , was able to start a brand new dynasty taking everything Mohammed tried so hard to create.

@resentfuldragon

2 жыл бұрын

@@georgeso4364 he didn't take everything nor did he actually do anything messed up either, his son was the one who did terrible crimes. Muawiyah was a true muslim and he simply made a mistake that he couldn't have seen the consequences off. Also the change the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) was making was religious, the political aspect wasn't really the point. I dare say its insane how the woman who was one of the most abusive towards muslims had her own son and dynasty become muslim rulers!

Ali one day while in kufa a man came to him asking him 'oh Ali in abubakar and othman caliphate there was peace, why is there strive in your caliphate? Ali answered him by saying 'they ruled man like me and I rule man like you'.

@triplem5770

2 жыл бұрын

Ali's companion who was also there: "bruh"

@EM-tx3ly

2 жыл бұрын

@@triplem5770 Iraq is forever the land of strife upheavels and sects It takes a firm tough cunning man to rule there

@harps_Nous

2 жыл бұрын

Spelling error: not ‘man’ men.

@PlatonicHesaf

2 жыл бұрын

"Emotional damage"

@EM-tx3ly

2 жыл бұрын

@@harps_Nous Thanks for correction Ali was too honest and upright but the Iraqis were a treacherous lot Al Hasan gave up power for he knew their incompetence Al Hussain unfortunately got killed by their cowardice and treachery Ali Al Sajad never listened to their lies Jaafer Al Sadeq knew their filth that's why he lived taught and died in Tayyibah or Al Madina Somethings never change

Ali Ibn Abu Taleb is traditionally considered to be one of the greatest and one of the most valiant Muslim warriors. He took part in almost all the battles fought by the nascent Muslim community. His contributions in the Battle of Khyber and the Battle of Badr are very well known. Legend and greatness

@HannibalBarca-jv4px

Жыл бұрын

The Prophet (ﷺ) passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, "May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire." Sahih al-Bukhari 2812

@mohammedalsaleh6997

Жыл бұрын

@@HannibalBarca-jv4px ahsant

@psychobuddy17

9 ай бұрын

​@@HannibalBarca-jv4px Last words of calling are idraaj and not words of prophet sw

@psychobuddy17

9 ай бұрын

Yeah but a weak leader Fitna started by his reign and he was made khalifa by people who killed Usman rz

@az88238

9 ай бұрын

​​​​@@psychobuddy17actually Usman was the weak one not Ali the devision of Muslims started from time of Usman Usman couldn't handle a rebellion but Ali defended him and that rebellion was because of his bad and weak ruling second when you have a mother of momenin rising against you which she shouldn't be doing (according to all Muslims) you would lose some influence thus you have a weaker ruling and weaker Omah third when you have a opportunist person like Muawiah (that all Muslims know him and his father and his son and passing power to his unworthy son is a prove to that ) waiting for a opportunity to get back in power and having half of your country in his grasp it's hard to be a strong leader

A professional coverage of a very edgy topic among Muslims till this very day. As a Muslim, my whole community growing up and I consider this period of turmoil a very big bundle of unfortunate events. Lots of companions of the Prophet, great men who sacrificed a lot for Islam, coming to blows, while both sides had very valid causes to defend. God bless them all, they all have our respect, and all are admired and remembered by their greatest deeds, among which this incident is very easy to be consciously overlooked.

@Agent.313

2 жыл бұрын

The truth is with Ali and Ali is with the truth. Those that are wrong are in hell.

@saif10ali

2 жыл бұрын

Ali was the righteous one. I still question why are we sunnis. We are the ones who oppressed our shia brothers.

@amenaha689

2 жыл бұрын

A very sensible comment. Agree with each word. 💯 I do think K&G shouldn't get into this though.

@georgeso4364

2 жыл бұрын

Can’t we just be honest and admit that these famous people in history were all ambitious and cunning people that selfishly clung to power and cared not about the welfare of humanity?

@Agent.313

2 жыл бұрын

​@@Alejandro-te2nt sunni jurisprudential methodology is that of iblis. Quite literally. Iblis did qiyas and he was cursed to hell yet I find it odd in what world do sunnis think their qiyas and istislah, and istidlal, etc going to take them to Jannah. like you might as well just tell Allah to retire and take over for him in making halal and haram based on your "analogy". This is enough to invalidate sunni methodology even if we ignore the fact that sunnis have very minuscule amount hadith to take sunnah from even if we accept all sunni hadith are sahih every single one, even then they still fall short. And you say that "methodology of scholarship" as if we don't have scholarships lol. As for the Sunni and shia animosity being a modern phenomenon is not such a modern phenomenon. The only difference is that shia are allowed to be vocal now especially in the west without the fear of getting their heads chopped off. Before, most shia won't even publicly declare being shia because of how oppressive sunni rulers were for the past 1400 years, and even now in not such educated parts of the Sunni world, Shias are still being killed. So we quietly literally had to walk on eggshells around Sunnis in case some dumb-ass Sunni scholar issuing another fatwa or caliph making "the blood of shia is more halal to spill than red wine" (yes that's a real fatwa). Lastly, do not disrespect Imam Ali with the RA after his name. It should be only AS. It's not "may allah be pleased with him" as if Allah is in some way not pleased with Ali. Allah most definitely is happy and pleased with Ali, a testimony of the prophet and found in sahih Sunni books. There is no ikhtilaf on it.

When asked by a Muslim why there was so much treachery and strife during his rule as Calif, Ali answered “The previous Califs ruled over people like me. And now I rule over people like you!” Massive burn!!!

@craftyunicorn4291

Жыл бұрын

😂

@aub3365

Жыл бұрын

😂

@ZainAfd

11 ай бұрын

It’s funny 😅😂

We, as Sunnis, believe that any fighting or disagreement among the prophet's companions is unfortunate, and we love all of his companions based on the effort they put to defend the religion and support their prophet.

@Omer1996E.C

2 жыл бұрын

The civil war occurred because of the murder of the elected caliphs successor. It was a war made by rebels, khawarij

@aegystierone8505

2 жыл бұрын

What about the Shias?

@mdsabahuddin8251

2 жыл бұрын

@@aegystierone8505 Shias only regard a handful of companions as righteous and disregard the faith of the others and say that they were not real muslims.

@drg.naufal

2 жыл бұрын

@@aegystierone8505 Shia is not Islam

@Omer1996E.C

2 жыл бұрын

@@ahmadsalek976 also few other companions like Salman al farsi. The Persian companion

Never imagined Kings and Generlas would cover this! I thought of this topic as my personal interest that K&G would never know or never do. Im so pleasantly surprised! K&G team is priceless!

@williamyoung9401

Жыл бұрын

Brave, K&G. Very brave. Not even a disclaimer. lol. Just don't show a picture of the Prophet!

@RobenArjen

Жыл бұрын

It’s empire and rashidun caliphate is one of the most largest empires ever

After you finish Early Muslim Expansion series (assuming with fall of Uamayyads in Damascus), will you continue story of other Caliphates like Fatimidis, Abbasids and Fourth Fitma (the most interesting one if you ask me).

@abusuleymantariq2137

2 жыл бұрын

4th Fitna? The war between the sons of Harun Al Rashid

@aleksapetrovic6519

2 жыл бұрын

@@abusuleymantariq2137 yep, or The Great Abbasid Civil War. To be honest, the way Abbasid fell is very interesting, because unlike previous Empires (eg. Achaemenid Empire), Caliph simply became spiritual leader while while many kindgoms flourished, especially Persian ones, that is until Mongols came. Same thing in the west with Tai'fas, except Christian menance didn't come out of nowhere.

@NobleKorhedron

2 жыл бұрын

@@aleksapetrovic6519 Well the Christian Spanish were really the successors of the conquered Visigothic Kingdom...

@abusuleymantariq2137

2 жыл бұрын

@@aleksapetrovic6519 The turks also came after and became very powerful in the Abbasid caliphate as well, until like you said the Caliph became a spiritual leader only.

@aleksapetrovic6519

2 жыл бұрын

@@NobleKorhedron True, but we are talking about Muslims and for them Christians were just northern nusiance until they became serious treat.

Hope to see Siffin, Nahrawan and Karbala battles in the next episodes. I also hope to see Mukhtar's rebellion in future episodes. Thanks for the content!

@SuperMfy1

2 жыл бұрын

Bro if kings and generals try doing karbala, they will mess up and have tons of backlash, this is not advisable

@DrPult

2 жыл бұрын

@Faheem Yusuf I know, but I don't think they can just skip Karbala! It is a pretty important event in that time period and with the whole fitna theme that they started this season of their Early Muslim expansion series with, I feel they are going to somehow include Karbala...

@mohdaamir5979

2 жыл бұрын

He already talks about Karbala in the video Shia Sunni divide.

@hki4464

2 жыл бұрын

@@SuperMfy1 he already did an episode about Karbala like a year ago, it's called Muslim schism or something like that, and as usual with this channel it's very well researched and detailed.

@Sultan_Alsafi

2 жыл бұрын

Mukhtar Al Thaqafi has a really good tv show u should watch

Time traveler: Hey, what year is it? Arab man: It's the year AH 40 (661 CE) Time traveler: So it's the end of the First Fitna, right? Arab man: What do you mean "First"?

@MAYONNAISEMOOSE

3 ай бұрын

😭😭

Muhammad, Ali and Zubayr were cousins. In the battle of Uhd, when the three were fighting alongside in melee, Muhammad said that Zubayr who is now defending Ali, will once march out to kill him. Ammar is said to have said this hadith to Zubayr. After hearing this once again, Zubayr starting crying and returned without fighting. Killed by Kharjites shortly afterwards

@AbdullahZakir

2 жыл бұрын

Can you please link the hadith

@arifzuhayri7230

2 жыл бұрын

@@comradekenobi6908 Just because you dont know much about islam, doesnt make you right. If you’re truly a muslim, who is the first khalifah, and also who is the current khalifah

@KaeshurDemon

2 жыл бұрын

@@comradekenobi6908 you're right, non Muslims were the first people to say "Islam is a religion on peace". No! Islam is a religion of truth and justice

@KaeshurDemon

2 жыл бұрын

@@comradekenobi6908 you are truthful, may Allah reward you

@arifzuhayri7230

2 жыл бұрын

@@comradekenobi6908 Well, yes you’re right. I was just testing you. But I prefer to only call rashidun caliphate as khalifah and some khalifs during the time of umayyad caliphate

Finally we have Early Muslim Expansion Season 3!! Thanks a lot K&G!!!

@zccau2316

2 жыл бұрын

Some parts are inaccurate though

@zccau2316

2 жыл бұрын

@@ibrahim-sj2cr from my understanding everything was accurate. He just missed out key points like it was khwariji who caused confusion and started the war between Ali and Aisha or that it was Hasan and Hussein who took Aisha back home after Ali forgave her and they made up etc

@mhmadbedrddeen3414

2 жыл бұрын

@@zccau2316 khawarij were after the battle of seffin, you just make up stuff to justify what Aisha did, ten of thousands of muslims were killed because of her, she disobeyed Allah when he ordered all the prophet's wives to satay in their homes yet she went on a camel ride leading an army and then you say it's the khawarij, what a hypocrisy

@jekesan4221

2 жыл бұрын

@@mhmadbedrddeen3414 She is not the prophet's wife anymore, she used to be yeah but Prophet Muhammad died. In Islam the sacred oath of marriage ended right after death of the wife or husband. That's why muslims were forbidden to keep the sperm seeds of their husband to be used after their husbands death.

@rodneywarr4873

2 жыл бұрын

@@zccau2316 you liar moviaya ibn Abu Sufyan contested Allah's Captain

The Battle of the Camel (656 CE), as it was later styled because of Aisha's ride - a camel, was a pyrrhic victory, in that Ali's popularity suffered as a result. Aisha, owing to her status as the wife of the Prophet, was sent to Medina with every mark of honor, where she lived in retirement for the rest of her life. Although Ali's military genius spared the lives of many, several notable Muslims such as Talhah and Zubayr met their end. Shortly after his victory, Ali moved his capital to Kufa in Iraq because of popular support and to save Medina from the perils of the war.

@Omer1996E.C

2 жыл бұрын

Aisha's demand was to revenge from the murderers of caliph uthman, as they entered in caliph ali's army, and Ali accepted to revenge from the murderers. Who were later called khawarij or kharijites, and would also assassinate the 4th caliph, Ali

@EM-tx3ly

2 жыл бұрын

Kufans were far less reliable and more prone to disarray than Syrians Although Ali was the better commander and military leader but his troops let him down and formed spilnter group Khawarij that Ultimately led to assassination of Caliph himself No Khawarij found in Al Sham though

@kumarg3598

2 жыл бұрын

Kufa seems far from Medina. Why go so far?

@wewenang5167

2 жыл бұрын

@@kumarg3598 People from Kufah are treacherous, that was Ali's biggest mistake because he trusted them.

@Omer1996E.C

2 жыл бұрын

@@wewenang5167 don't scold the whole people, this is haram. Although generally true, but there are many good people there

Another great video, but a couple of things to point: 1. One of if not the most important reasons why Ali did not immediately take justice on the rebels, was that they were in the thousands, and he needed all the support he can get, so he argued that all provinces should give him their fealty before taking justice. 2. Zubayer and Talha weren't necessarily rebelling against Ali, they attempted to take Justice in their own hands and punish the Rebels for killing Uthman. 3. Prior to the battle of the camel, there was an attempt by Ali to reconcile, and it almost worked, but according to most Muslim sources the rebels in Ali's army instigated the battle, since any reconciliation would cause in their demise. Nonetheless another great video overall, keep up the good work!

@azzamfauzy3676

2 жыл бұрын

I blv Ali just like uthman believed cracking down on the rebels would fracture the caliphate.. so they didnt want the caliphate to crumble and break away… mayb they were right..

@zccau2316

2 жыл бұрын

Great points. Also in the end both Ali and Aisha made up. From what I recall it was Hassan and Hussein who took Aisha back not Muhammed Ibn Abi Bakr

@mhmadbedrddeen3414

2 жыл бұрын

Zubayer, Talha and Aisha didn't had a right to Uthman blood so to revenge him by their on hand and they weren't the persons of authority to bring justice, the khalifa was, this was an excuse to grab power from Ali and take the khilafa for them, some narrations state that they are the ones instigated the killing of Uthman to take the khilafa but when they saw the muslims going towards Ali they claimed that they want justice. Again they have no right whatsoever. AzZahbi narrates Ali when he met Zubayer he said to him "you want from me the blood of Uthman and you are the one who killed him" Alos he narrates "when Ali arrived at basra he sent Zubayer, Talha and Aisha a messenger baring a Quran to spare the blood of muslims yet they killed him and he was the first to be killed his name was Muslim al juhani" Also it was known that the killers of Uthman were in madina not basra, why they went their if they wanted justice? And we all know that Iraq was were the supporters of Ali reside and kufa was his chosen capital, so we see that they wanted to strike the base of the supporters of Ali to take the power from him and it wasn't about justice. They killed Uthman to take power, and when that didn't happen they fought Ali to take the power from him

@azzamfauzy3676

2 жыл бұрын

@@mhmadbedrddeen3414 definitely a shia… not considered to b muslims… u write as if u saw it all… how on earth did aisha or zubayr kill uthman or why d they?? It was decided by them after death of umar that after uthman it ll be Ali who d b khalifa.. so u shias have ur own version of history..not based on truth or facts just slander against the companions of the prophet…

@mhmadbedrddeen3414

2 жыл бұрын

@@azzamfauzy3676 Yes i'm a shia, so are you going to tkfir me and blow me up and cut my head off like your forefathers did before ? As for what i said it's all in your books but you don't read nor do you comprehend, note down the narrations of the killing of Uthman روي عن عبد الله بن عياش بن أبي ربيعة أنه دخل على عثمان بن عفان وقت حصاره في بيته من قبل الثوار، فسمع كلام الثوار فمرَّ عليهم طلحة بن عبيد الله ودعى ابن عديس وناجاه، ثم رجع ابن عديس وقال لأصحابه: لا تتركوا أحداً يدخل على هذا الرجل، ولا يخرج من عنده، فقال عثمان: هذا ما أمر به طلحة بن عبيد الله، ثم قال عثمان: اللهم اكفني طلحة بن عبيد اللَّه، فإنه حمل عليّ هؤلاء وألبهم، واللَّه إني لأرجو أن يكون منها صِفرًا، وأن يُسفَكَ دَمه، إنَّه انتهكَ مني ما لا يحلُّ لهُ. تاريخ الطبري ج٤ ص٣٧٩,٣٧٨ قال اليعقوبي: وحصر ابن عديس البلوي عثمان في داره، فناشدهم الله، ثم نشد مفاتيح الخزائن، فأتوا بها إلى طلحة بن عبيد الله، وعثمان محصور في داره، وكان أكثر من يؤلّب عليه طلحة والزبير وعائشة. تاريخ اليعقوبي ص١٧٦ دخل المغيرة بن شعبة على عائشة، فقالت: يا أبا عبد الله لو رأيتني يوم الجمل قد نفذت النصال هودجي، حتى وصل بعضها إلى جلدي، فقال لها المغيرة: وددت والله أن بعضها كان قتلك، فقالت: يرحمك الله، ولم تقول هذا؟ قال: لعلها تكون كفّارة في سعيك على عثمان، فقالت: أما والله لئن قلت ذلك لما علم الله أني أردت قتله، ولكن علم الله أني أردتُ أن يُقاتل فَقوتلتْ، وأردتُ أن يُرمى فرُميتْ، وأردتُ أن يُعصى فعُصيتْ؛ ولو عَلِمَ مني أني أردت قتله لقُتلت. العقد الفريد ج٥ ص٤٦ These narrations in your own books shows that Aisha Talha and Zubayer instigated the people to kill Uthman, بعد مبايعة المسلمين لعلي بالخلافة وامتناع معاوية بن أبي سفيان من البيعة عزم، على الخروج لحربه، وبينما هو يتجهز للخروج إلى الشام أتاه الخبر أن طلحة والزبير وعائشة قد خرجوا يطلبون بدم عثمان، ويريدون التوجه إلى البصرة، فتجمعوا في مكة لذهاب عائشة إلى هناك، وفي طريقها إلى مكة لما كانت بمنطقة سرف لقيها عبيد الله بن أبي سلمة (ابن أم كلاب) وهو من أخوالها، وأخبرها بقتل عثمان، واجتماع الناس على بيعة علي، فقالت: ليت هذه انطبقت على هذه إن تم الأمر لصاحبك، ردُّوني ردُّوني، فانصرفت إلى مكة، وهي تقولُ: قُتِلَ واللَّه عثمانُ مظلوماً، واللَّه لأطلُبنَّ بدمه، فقال لها: وَلِمَ؟ واللَّه إنّ أوّل من أمال حَرفهُ لأنتِ، ولقد كنت تقولين: اقتلوا نعثلاً فقد كفر. قالت: إنهم استتابوه ثم قتلوه، وقد قلت وقالوا، وقولي الأخير خير من قولي الأول، فقال لها ابن أم كلاب: فمنكِ البَدَاءُ ومنــــــــــــك الغِير ‏ ومنكِ الرِّياح ومنكِ المطــــــــــــــرْ وأنتِ أمرتِ بقتل الإمــــــــــــــــام وقلتِ لنا إنه قد كفــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــرْ فهبنا أطعناكِ في قتلـــــــــــــــــــــهِ وقاتلهُ عندنا من أمــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــرْ ولم يسقط السقف من فوقنا‏ ولم ينكسف شمسنا والقمـــــــــــــرْ وقد بـــــــــــــــــــايع الناس ذا تُدرإٍ يُزيلُ الشبا ويُقيم الصَّعَــــــــــــــــــــرْ ويلبسُ للحـــــــــــــــــــــــربِ أثوابها‏ وما من وفى مثل من قد غــدرْ الكامل في التاريخ ابن الأثير ج٢ ص٥٧٠,٥٦٩ This narration says how when Aisha new about Uthman's death and Ali became the khalifa she started saying i will avenge Uthman and so and so, as such Aubidllah ebn Um salama said to her didn't you said kill Na'athal he commit blasphemy... Talha and Zubayer voted for Ali so they can get to rule Iraq and Yeman and when he didn't gave them what they want, they went on to say we want to avenge Uthman and took Aisha with them as she didn't want to see Ali as khalifa, and made this an excuse to rebel against Ali, it's not our version of history it's all in your books, weird how you don't read tour books and follow blindly like sheep, the slander about those sahaba are from your books i referenced them go read and so your homework, tell me by what you said that they decide Ali is the khalifa why they fought him ? What is the penalty for fighting the rightful khalifa according to you ? Why did Aisha went to basra on a camel while Allah ordered her to stay at her home like the rest of the wives of the prophet ? That alone condemns her, why she did fitnah and thousands of muslims were killed because of her ?

I've been waiting for this so badly, Kings and Generals😩

I have been watching this channel for a year now and your videos are absolutely splendid! Keep up the good work!! Could you after this make videos on other caliphates like the Fatimids?

@d.m.collins1501

2 жыл бұрын

I'd like to see more, too, but you should also check out their existing videos that go into detail on many of the Islamic Caliphates. Though I don't know if ALL entities in history that have referred to themselves as "Caliphates" are considered Caliphates by ALL Muslims--meaning some of the Muslim empires in these videos might fall short--I suspect there's plenty to suit all tastes. E.g. the Ottoman Caliphate has a whole of videos on this channel! To find it, just click on the words Kings and Generals under the image, then click "Playlist" and find "Ottoman History" at the very bottom. You will also find some applicable videos in the Medieval Battles playlist, and any playlist that has the word "Crusade" in it. :) You can also search for these video titles, which have a lot of stuff about many caliphates, even if not all the videos are solely about the caliphates. Here are some I think would apply, with the most caliphate-y ones at the top: 1. Berber Empires: Zirids, Almoravids and Almohads DOCUMENTARY 2. Muslim Schism: How Islam Split into the Sunni and Shia Branches 3. Islamic Golden Age: Scientific Method DOCUMENTARY 4. Islamic Golden Age: Islamic Golden Age - Philosophy and Humanities 5. Battle of Talas 751 - Abbasid - Tang War DOCUMENTARY 6. Crusades from the Muslim Perspective 7. Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa (1212) DOCUMENTARY (The last one is largely about Al-Andalus/Spain as a whole, and shows the time when the Emirate of Cordoba declared THEMSELVE to be the "Caliphate of Cordoba.")

@EdgyHistorian2661

2 жыл бұрын

@@d.m.collins1501 Yes I have seen these except for the Berber one though I want them to make one on the Fatimid Caliphate as well as the early Umayyad and Abbasid rule

@EdgyHistorian2661

2 жыл бұрын

@@d.m.collins1501 Thank You for highlighting these videos for me!!! I will be sure to check them out!

@shhahhida

10 ай бұрын

@@d.m.collins1501thank you!

(Quran 6:159) "Surely, those who have made divisions in their religion and turned into factions, you have nothing to do with them. Their case rests with Allah alone; then He will tell them what they have been doing"

@RB-cool00701

2 жыл бұрын

😏 anything that involves human grouping ends up in faction. That is fact. People are superior to religion, that is why religion will never change what makes us human. In a group 5 human, there is high possibility of 3 to 2 sub group formed. You can take history of any religion or culture, the answer is the same. The Creator of mankind knows it too.

@resentfuldragon

2 жыл бұрын

@@RB-cool00701 "people are superior to religion" then why were the worst killers in history were either athiest or didn't follow the rules of the religions they claimed to follow? The religions we have keep us grounded to unchanging laws and are very important, without religion our rules change and we lose sight of what is humane and fair treatment. Without religion we made nuclear weapons, concentration camps, napalm and white phosphorous, and we decimate cityblocks at a time with weapons. Meanwhile in Islamic warfare for example, killing civilians is haram as is using fire weaponry. Its also haram to be racist and ethnically cleanse people. Without religion we do horrible things.

@georgeso4364

2 жыл бұрын

If only Aisha followed this command in the Koran...

@youssefzidan3185

2 жыл бұрын

Be aware of what you will all say because you are apeaking about the prophet PBUH Companions

@georgeso4364

2 жыл бұрын

Youssef Zidan Is that a threat?

Thanks for sharing the video 👍🏻

Was waiting for new vid on this documentary ever since the last one, also new animation of map and generals/rulers looks amazing

As a Christian it's interesting to see the Muslim Expansion and subsequent fracture among the sects. It's almost a repeat of what happened with the Protestants and Catholics in the West in the 30 Years War.

@JRGProjects

10 ай бұрын

@@r.a.2392 Christians believe Jesus Christ is God in human form, that's the difference. That's where the phrase "Lord and Savior" come from.

Great job guys. Very balanced content, and considerate presentation.

Yesssss!!! Thought the Muslim Expansion series was put on pause glad to see a new episode.

Fantastic video keep it up your doing amazing job

Splendid video! Can't wait for your next one. A town called Zubair, after the aformentioned prophet compaion, where he is burried, located near Basra, modern Iraq. This battle is still to this day a source of heated debate among muslims.

Wonderful episode! These stories of the early Muslim days are fascinating!⚔🏹⚔

@jekesan4221

2 жыл бұрын

Quite sad story for us Muslims, marked the first split of unity between ummah

Waited years for this thanks K&G❤️🙏🏿

Excellent video 📹 Wait for next one.

It is actually amazing how you addressed such sensitive issue .. really great 👍

Great video once again. Love the early Muslim conquest series.

Again, the best KZread channel bringing excelent content

I believe it is intended, but you seem to choose the musical instrument (in this case the duduk) perfectly to create an athmosphere where you show us that something is changing utterly and irreversebly. Sadness comes to mind... You did quite the work also with the video (a pinnacle of work, clearly) about the sack of Constantinople (I almost cried, almost). Good narration, excellent soundtrack and the artist who creates the painted pictures are mesmerizing! Please, keep up this astonishing team work! Thank you!

Thank you so much for this series! I love learning history. Especially religious history. Again, thank you

@dthomas9230

7 ай бұрын

Religious history is like seeing the history of human's cancer of the soul and mind. Sky fairies do nor exist and an Imam or two ended all further learning when Indo-Arabic mathematics had established the basis of the modern technological miracles but abandoned them for ignorance and faith in a farcical myth for 1500 years. Christians were just as vile and vicious. Jews, other than that Goliath myth, didn't muster armies or kings. India's Hindus defeated Islam. Pakistan is still pissed.

At 5:50 you make a slight but important mistake. The Muslims already had a fully compiled Quran of the original documents from the time of the Prophet that was compiled by Abu Bakr(ra) right after the death of the prophet. All Uthman(ra) did was he took this copy and made copies of it and spread it throughout the empire, and also used it to check other qurans.

@giovannijunior9642

2 жыл бұрын

That is actually incorrect. Even with Abubakar's complied mushaf. There were still a number of others, that were notably slightly different. Like Abdullah ibn Masoud's, and the mushaf of Fatma. A couple of early Muslim scholars and historians spoke of it. Al qurtubi for instance.

@ddd7864

2 жыл бұрын

@@giovannijunior9642 I did not dispute this. I just said that the way he said it in the video made it seem like Uthman(ra) compiled a quran himself, when all he did was check the other qurans against the one that he knew was correct as it had originated from just after the death of the prophet, and then burned the ones that has errors compared to this master copy

@ibrahimyilmaz4861

2 жыл бұрын

@@giovannijunior9642 Actually, what you said is incorrect, at least partly. When Zayd bin Sabid compiled the Quran under Abu bakr's Caliphate, the companians of the prophet sav agreed on his compilation. Zayd bin Sabid was someone who was known for his amazing level of Hifz (regarding his memorization of the Quran) but nevertheless he insisted on getting witnesses for every single verse, no witness could testify for 2 verses. This lead to this unquestionable level of accuracy. So what is the whole "slight differences" issue? It is the issue of Qiraat in the Quran. The different reading styles. These are not man-made, but divine. They all stem from the Prophet sav and there are 7 Mutawatir level authentic reading styles (including the Asim Qiraat that is the most used since uthman). All of these have a chain of narration going through the huge companions like Abdullah ibn Masoud or Abdullah ibn Abbas up to the Prophet sav, having him as the source of it. Some few Qurans also had slight mistakes from the original due to the Hifz (memorization) of the author being wrong in parts. Notably, these were the minority and the huge majority of Muslims agreed that these were, in fact, mistakes by those people. After Zayd bin sabid had compiled the Quran in a single Mushaf with his authentic method, this mushaf was kept with Hafsa bint Umar, the wife of the prophet sav. Long story short, Uthman made copies of it and sent them to the city centers and ordered that the populous may copy the Quran that was sent and burn all other Qurans they had at home, in order to prevent mistakes from occurring in the reading of the Quran. Regarding the "Abdullah bin Masuds Quran" you mentioned: He didnt have a "Quran". He didnt have a book. It was his Qiraat that you refer to. His Qiraat wasnt "another version" it was merely a different Qiraat formt he Qiraat of the majority of Muslims, nonetheless an authentic one traced to the prophet sav himself. A senior scholar to his, known for his accuracy in memorization, Exegese and understanding of the Quran, the cousin of the prophet sav, ibn Abbas (ra) noted that: "My Qiraat is the Qiraat of Zayd (bin Sabid, the man who compiled the Quran) [ie. i agree with him], but i agree with about 10 readings of ibn Mesuds Qiraat." [ibn Abu Dawud, Kitabul Mashahif, Page 55]. Abdullah ibn Masud simply didn't have another Quran, he just had a different Qiraah, which wasn't destroyed by Uthman or something like that, the Isnad of many authentic Qiraat go through him. Regarding the "mushaf of Fatima": This isn't even claimed to be a Quran-Mushaf. The existence of the Mushaf of Fatima is only claimed by the Shia. Sunnis, who make up 90% of Muslims, don't even acknowledge its claimed existence. Shias claim, that when the prophet sav died, the angel Jibreel (Gabriel) came and talked to Fatima, the daughter of the prophet sav to "cheer her up". He would convey her predictions of the future and talk to her. The Mushaf of Fatima is claimed to have documented these conversations between her and Jibreel as well as some predictions of the future brought to her by the same angel. As i have said, only Shias regard this presumed Mushaf to be real and even if it is real, this doesn't proof anything since nobody claims this is a Quranic mushaf but some sort of different revelation that has nothing to do with the Quran. And i'm sure Qurtubi spoke of it, but you should know that not only "early Muslims scholars and historians" have spoke of it, as if this is some kind of secret matter, but even contemporary Muslim scholars and historians talk of it, not to forget the classical ones. I would also kindly ask you regarding your sources, where did you get this misinformation from (The Qiraat of Abdullah bin Masoud and Mushaf of Fatima)?

@Agent.313

2 жыл бұрын

@ddd786 corrections to your correction. You made a slight but important mistake. The Muslims already had a fully compiled Qur'an from the time of the prophet done under his direct supervision. Right after the death of the prophet, Ali was tasked, by the prophet, to compile the chronological and with tafsir, the Qur'an. Then later Ali the true father of Arabic grammar whose student, abu al aswad, was ordered by Imam Ali, added the correct vowels so everyone can recite it in the correct Quraishi dialect.

@sultansultan5447

2 жыл бұрын

@Ibrahim Alloush you are aware burning the other qurans was not blasphemy because to only way to get rid of something in a pure way is burning of burying. This is the Islamic stance.

appreciate the content, please keep it up

Great video! Can we do another on the battle of the shoes in the marketplace?? 😃

I have been watching since the first series.. i see you taken a lot of criticism and feedbacks.. using calligraphy to replace image of sahaba.. and not using moon as symbol. Outstanding works!

@arkamukhopadhyay9111

Жыл бұрын

Ah, so he caved in to threats.

@libertas5005

Жыл бұрын

@@arkamukhopadhyay9111 First of all, it's not a he, it's a group of people. The narrator is just that, the narrator. And no one threatened him, as a matter of fact, most of the people in comments are civilized and if anyone shares criticism, I see it being shared in a constructive and respectful manner. So, maybe stop being a lying prick and enjoy the content for once.

@Killzoneguy117

11 ай бұрын

​@@arkamukhopadhyay9111 oh shut up Ranjeet

Finally! After a Year The Third Season is Here ❤

Your videos are so quality, I wonder how you will be able to produce these videos.

I thought you ended this series, im quite excited

I suggest you make a series about the Sassanid dynasty. About Shapur's war with Valerian; Mani Movement; Mazdak Revolution; Or about characters like Cartier, Bahram Choobin and Bozorgmehr. Or on issues related to the religion of Zoroaster, or the reforms of Anushirvan.

great videon as usual

Thank you for your great series

Thank you Kings and Generals Team.

Ah yes my favourite series is back

@uniuni8855

2 жыл бұрын

Jedi killer, war criminal

@uniuni8855

2 жыл бұрын

And Sith puppet

This series is one of my favourites👍🏻

So Thankful for this effort

Extremely great content!!

I really like how you describe such Islamic history objectively. I really get to knkw about things that nobody talk about here.

Thanks for making more and more videos on Islamic history... Love your work

I love your videos. Keep it up

Fantastic as always.

Good job Kings and Generals channel very impressive, regarding 17:47 good point there is also one more important reason Zubayr left the battle, before starting the battle Ali and Zubair met they are cousins but Ali was in the right side and Zubair was wrong, so Ali reminded Zubair of prophet Mohammad peace be apon him said to them before he passes away: "Oh Zubair do you like Ali?" Zubier said: Yes! then the prophet replied: "one day you will fight him and your the one who is in the wrong side". So for that reason, Zubair left the battle Arabic Sources: Mostadrak alhatem hadith number 5573, Book of jamal, sifin, and khawarej for Ibn Abi Shaibah

@ldz8746

Жыл бұрын

Salam brother, that hadith is da'if. The hadith about the wrong side is about the Siffin battle between Muawiya and Ali.

@ldz8746

Жыл бұрын

There is no clear hadith that condemns one side of the future battle of the Camel. But there is a sahih hadith about the killers of Amar Ibn Yassir being the wrong side, this was the battle of Siffin. The battle of Siffin is comprehensive & difficult to blame one side, it was a real fitnah because people wanted to restore back dignity of the caliphate and punish Othman killers, Ali didn't follow that path because he had his ijtihad and wanted stability and avoiding more bloodshed. But Siffin battle was a war for power, where it seems Muawiyah's goal was taking power at all costs and Allah knows best. This doesn't help Shia who deviated from islam.

@brotherjaafar2861

Жыл бұрын

@@ldz8746 Salam Brother, regarding the hadith it is not weak as your saying I found it صحيح authuntic in a book called الحاكم النيسابوري - المستدرك على الصحيحين Every muslim fought against Ali is wrong there had been 3 civil wars against Ali and he is right in all wars and the oposers are wrong that is actually a hadith that says: truth is with Ali and Ali is with truth.

@brotherjaafar2861

Жыл бұрын

@@ldz8746 the salafis are the ones delaited from Islam through there teachings, there are plenty of hadiths about the battle of the camel, I believe the hadith of the dogs of hawab is clear to show that Ali is right and Aysha is wrong. Siffin war is more than clear, a lot of Sahabas joined the battle and fought Mowiya

@ldz8746

Жыл бұрын

@@brotherjaafar2861 It is not related to Salafiya, the old scholars themselves weakened the hadith due to very bad Sanad, but no one denies the hadith about Amar Ibn Yassir killers which condemns Muawiya very clearly. If we start taking hadiths from here and there without looking at Sanad (thing which is very common in most Chiia books) then we will start making stories which will match our wishes. And that is a catastrophy.

The Person Behind the Fitna was Abdullah ibn Saba

@raheelhaider9295

2 жыл бұрын

Lol how abdullah ibn e saba persuaded aisha to fight ali?

@user-bp7xz2bo5w

2 жыл бұрын

@@raheelhaider9295 wow😅

@abdulrehman-md1nx

2 жыл бұрын

It was maviyah intent to hold power and he used revenge of Usman r.a as shield

@khalilerron854

Жыл бұрын

They are the criminals, Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr, Amr ibn al-Hamaq al-Khuza’i, Malik al-Ashtar, Abdullah ibn Badil and Muhammad ibn Abi Hudhaifah.They attacked Uthman ibn Affan in his house and cut him to pieces.Amr ibn al-Hamaq al-Khuza’i says (I stabbed Uthman 9 stabs 6 of them to allah and 3 of them when I had in my heart against Uthman)

@soheil527

Жыл бұрын

@@raheelhaider9295 Wow, Ali refused to punish uthman killers . Abdullah saba persuaded hussein to die n karbala. did hussein not have common sense?

Thanks for the information..

I was wating for this for so long!

New Fantasy/Sci-fi videos over here!

@no5829

2 жыл бұрын

Hello

What are the primary sources you used for this video, the death of Uthman was while he was reciting the Quran, he was a 80 year old man. There were some minor things that you spoke of which I found wrong.

Amazing stories , thanks for video.

good stuff as always

Great video as always! It would be cool if u guys in the future would do a couple videos on Boleslaw I the Brave and his son Mieszko II Lambert. There's not many videos on them even tho they turned Poland into a power house.

Can you also cite the sources in the description of the video so that the viewer can get the first time experience please 🥺🥺🥺🙏🙏.

@mash1738

2 жыл бұрын

@@yasinibrahim narrations are totally factual the reason you don't like them is the fact that they are not taken from the books of your school of thought, that's why u mad.

@afifsahrin5708

2 жыл бұрын

@@yasinibrahim agreed with you man. Aisha didn't come as rebelion army, so many wrong facts that made Aisha looks bad, that's what Shia wants

@stevves4647

2 жыл бұрын

@@mash1738 If you put their haidths to actual haidith criticism it wouldn't last beyond 1 chain.

@mash1738

2 жыл бұрын

@@stevves4647 so you are declaring hadith of your own school of thought as actual hadith, see that is the problem. Everyone keeps presenting their shit as authentic one and others as fabricated .

@mash1738

2 жыл бұрын

@@afifsahrin5708 don't know why it's hard for you guys to accept the fact that aisha got tricked by talha and zubair.

Iv been waiting for this since you guys released the split of Islam video.

can't wait for the rest of season 3

Imam Ali was the rightful Caliph After Prophet Mohammad peace be upon him.

@raphanonymous22

8 күн бұрын

Real

The most detailed account of the camel battle I have seen so far. Really great work!!!

@zccau2316

2 жыл бұрын

check out farid responds videos. More detailed than this

@nuraldinal-shebane4713

2 жыл бұрын

it is not detailed they ignor the most important thing as history event a d the rule of ibn sbaa and killer of ottoman to stop any peace you need to read a book about it .

Great work 😎👍

More vidéo about this période 👍🏼

Finally my heart is at ease

It's an absolute shame we don't have better sources on early Muslim expansion.

@al-muwaffaq341

2 жыл бұрын

@@ahmadsalek976 he’s right lol

@hafidlho7332

2 жыл бұрын

@@ahmadsalek976 it's a shame we don't have unbiased sources, because most of the source have political agenda based on their allegiance

@timesnewbabylonian8088

2 жыл бұрын

@@ahmadsalek976 I agree with you 100% brother. We have some of the best record-keeping.

@dawahinarabic730

2 жыл бұрын

There are better sources, go watch videos of منجم التاريخ and you will know what I am talking about

@osman7240

2 жыл бұрын

@williamperese stfu atheism has killed more people than Islam and Christianity combined.

great video as usual

Great video... looking forward to the next episode in the series

In short, Ali, Fatima, Hassan, Hussein, ... (Ahl al-bayt) were right.💚 We have to choose from whom we get Islam. From the Ahl al-Bayt or from the usurpers and murderers of the Ahl al-Bayt.

@wewenang5167

2 жыл бұрын

no! both were right...the only wrong people here are the khawarij and treacherous Persian people from Kufah.

@Agent.313

2 жыл бұрын

@@wewenang5167 you are majnun. so the killers and the killed are going to jannah? don't make a joke of Allah's justice.

@Agent.313

2 жыл бұрын

@@mmss3199 let me get this right. So what you are saying, some people can go to jannah for killing sahabis because it was a "mistake" but someone who just only talk "bad" about them are going to hell? I think the Allah that willing to let the killers of believer into heaven won't give two cents about me "slandering" the dead as you put it. Because that Allah's justice is nothing more than a goat's fart. Read Quran and read about what's the crime of killing a believer. "whosoever killeth a human being for other than manslaughter or corruption in the earth, it shall be as if he had killed all mankind,"

@azerill1173

2 жыл бұрын

MM SS People can make mistakes!!! And why should we follow someone who makes such a big mistakes (The biggest mistake that could have happened) and get a religion ?!! In addition, People may make mistakes. Not that they can make mistakes.🙂

@Fundamental_Islam.

Жыл бұрын

Shut up please! You don’t know their intentions so keep you nonsense to yourself.

The persian gulf zone was the core of a very ancient civilization arrived from somewhere; they taught to the locals many helpful things. Check on yt: "The earthly paradise was it in the persian gulf?"

@yousuf6382

2 жыл бұрын

It was called the Akkadian Gulf, and it was inhabited on both sides of the Gulf by Semitic peoples before the Persians came from South Asia.. The greatest civilizations in it were Semitic, such as the Akkadian civilization and the Dilmun

@ghostd69

2 жыл бұрын

Gulf was originally belong to semeties people whom established oldetest civilization there before the arrival of persian to this region..you came from Eurasian Steppe and mirgated in west asia and central asia 1800bc

Great work thank you

kings and generals is the bast. you vid is amizng we want part 2 and 3 thank you. i am from kuwait and i allmost wacht oll of you vid

Those were not Muslims. Rather, the sect was claiming Islam and working under a man named Abdullah Ibn al-Saba, who planned this coup against Othman and quarrel among the Muslims under serval proclaims he made.

I sincerely thank KAG for not having represented by pictures the companions of the prophet, and for having taken into account the feeling of their Muslim audience once again this channel shows its tolerance, its wisdom and its professionalism, and concerning this episode as a muslim it was sad and difficult to see.

@mysticonthehill

Жыл бұрын

And while not K&G thank you. It is nice to see many communities come together in their appreciation of well told history.

Please make a video about dabuyid dynasty Thank you K&G for your great videos 🌹❤️

So when are you guys going back to dynastic China? I loved your episode on the War of the Eight Princes. Hope there'll be more.

Don't think you mentioned it, but Muhammad ibn Abu Bakr, one of the Egyptian rebels who may have killed Uthman, was the stepson of Ali ibn Abi Talib and also the brother of Aisha. Ali and Uthman were also both married to daughters of the Prophet Muhammad.

@Ibrahim-fh6kv

9 ай бұрын

And what is your evidence to support Muhammad ibn Abu Bakr was the one?

Can’t wait until you do one about the Russo-Ukrainian war a few years down the line

@just-some-muslim

2 жыл бұрын

👀

@dchegu

2 жыл бұрын

Too soon

@mism847

2 жыл бұрын

Perhaps a couple of years after it’s finished?

@yosman-609

2 жыл бұрын

@@petervarga7755and I am convinced that it is Russia on the losing side

@il967

2 жыл бұрын

@@yosman-609 lol

Thank you, honestly!

Brother do more of the Spanish I love your videos

This should be made into a netflix series

@georgeso4364

2 жыл бұрын

Yes totally!!! It would make Game of Thrones look like Sesame Street! Sadly, if this was made into a NetFlix or HBO series, the crazy fundamentalists will “do what they do best” and lots of innocent actors, writers, producers, etc will be murdered.

@zxera9702

2 жыл бұрын

@@georgeso4364 true

@Mitrandhir

Жыл бұрын

@@georgeso4364 and definitely they'll put black and rainbow actor 🤣🤣

There are some inaccuracies in the video

Keep up the amazing work kings 👍

Splendid by K&G! I hardly can find battle of camel as a documentary, and this is really good stuff. Kudos

Make a video about asack of mecca by Qarmatians

U didnt mention single word about the role of abdullah bin saba or ibn sauda. The one who trigger the fitna. While many scholars like ibn katheer mention him as the biggest factor of the fitna

@zayn670

2 жыл бұрын

That’s cuz Abdullah ibn Saba was a myth 🤣 all sources say that he started these fitna’s trace back to Sayf ibn Umar who was accused by many Sunni scholars to be a cursed, zindeeq and weak

@gludugtv3627

2 жыл бұрын

@@zayn670 thats a common false later than prove it wrong by many scholars from the age of Ibnu katheer himself until mutaakhirin. Unless you are shia

@zayn670

2 жыл бұрын

@@gludugtv3627 Of course the Bakri’s would try to make some fairytales about the Shia to try to stop it from spreading yet they don’t even know that even scholars said that Abdullah ibn Saba is a myth created by the famous fabricator Sayf

@ahsanbutt3578

2 жыл бұрын

ibn e saba character is a myth created to justify the wrong doings of BAAGI people who revolted against the rightly guided Caliph

@zayn670

2 жыл бұрын

@@ahsanbutt3578 ahsant

great video

Awesome video! Enjoy your week!

Common fact: 3 Empires emerged & swiftly reached their maximum extents within decades, & immediately fractured due to civil wars due to succession struggles: 1) Alexander's Empire (Divided after his death between his generals due to civil war) 2) Muslim Caliphate (Faced 5 Civil Wars, passing from Rashiduns to Umayyads & ultimately fractured during Abbasids era) 3) Mongol Empire (Reached maximum extent during Mongke's Reign, & fractured after his death as a result of Toluid Civil War)

@mayankbisht7691

2 жыл бұрын

Every Empire's fall is marked by constant infighting

@hannibalburgers477

2 жыл бұрын

Alexander's empire had the worst, empire fractured nanosecond after he died Mongols had the fourth worst,, and even after the break up, for a time the emperors of china-mongolia could keep others in check at least in one way or another. Third worst would be carolingian empire which just kept breaking up, getting united and breaking up again. The western Francia after the last interregnum evolved into HRE which was.. (you probably know the memes) Second worst would be Umayyad. (No comment. KZread would delete it otherwise.)

@worldofknowledge4802

2 жыл бұрын

@@mayankbisht7691 Agreed. But I observe it mostly in the case of those empires which swiftly emerged & expanded. Other large Empires like Rome, Persia, Maurya etc established & expanded over long spans of time & it took centuries for Rome, Persia etc to reach their extents of heighted control, allowing them to establish their cultural, legal & political basis strongly in annexed areas. Thus their decline also took time.

@worldofknowledge4802

2 жыл бұрын

@@hannibalburgers477 I would agree with regarding Umayyads. They were mostly usurpers, who believed on Arabian Superiority & tried to use Islam for their own Political Benefits. I will not say any further. Otherwise, my Muslim Brethren who harbor sensations for Umayyads will not hesitate from attacking my loyalty to my religion. Regarding, Alexander or Mongols, I'll say that I observed their empire's expansion based on their military tactics & strategies. Ultimately they didn't had any basic political or cultural cause to keep their empire unified. Which led to their fracture. Regarding Carolingian Empire, it fractured, but it left up two out of three successors to emerge up as strong future kingdoms. East & West Francia who would make up after centuries modern France & Germany. But Alexander's or Mongol's Empire didn't left up a permanent successor.

@MohamedMohamed-ws7mq

Жыл бұрын

@@worldofknowledge4802 this is a misconception they didn’t necessarily believe in Arab superiority but they didn’t want to ruin the status quo of the rulership by adding non Arabs this was reversed by the Abbasids who started appointing non Arabs as govenors and this will eventually ruin the caliphate because these governors would start dynasties and become more independent

We as Muslim are taught about the history of Muslims but it's all vague But u did an explended Job here making us learn this history in such a proper way U don't know how much thankful I am

@mahdiabdu4329

Жыл бұрын

it not vague its there and this videoin my opinion didn't do the topic justice.

@aboualhassanhassan9924

Жыл бұрын

As Shia, we've learned the details of this battle and all the other events growing up, because we are proud of the ones that stood strong with the message of the Prophet (pbuh), we were also taught about the hypocrites that hid within the muslim community. There's a very good reason why these details are hidden by ur teachers...

@hmmm3210

10 ай бұрын

​@@aboualhassanhassan9924Shia fan fiction isn't actual history buddy 😅 go back to searching for your twelfth imam

@sayyas8562

4 ай бұрын

@@aboualhassanhassan9924prophet said to kill the unbelievers and hypocrites

Thank u to started arab series❣️

please can you say what is the font use in this video . And i love your documentaries . all are very fasinating.

Idk why some people are trying to undermine the early muslim conquests by claiming that the Romans and Sassanians weakened eachother for centuries while theres some truth in that both still managed to field much larger armies and still lost... the main credit should go to generals like Khalid ibn Al Walid, Amr ibn Al As and Saad bin abi Waqqas

@zahidhussain4231

2 жыл бұрын

Someone speak the Truthh...

@lordloss3398

2 жыл бұрын

Because its true. The Romans and the Persians literally warredd and civil warred all over their empires for almost 3 decades while being ravaged by the plague. Why do you think heraclius went on an all out attack when reduced to just Greece and North Africa but basically gave up post Yarmouk. He even had to take loans from the church and melt their gold to raise his final army against persia.

@lordloss3398

2 жыл бұрын

@@ghostd69 it was a continuous 30 year war. Like not have a battle stop and pick up after recover but 30 years of non stop fighting and in fighting with the plague which also damaged and fractured alot of the defences. The biggest reason was how quickly the Arab expansion happened. They weren't given enough breathing time to recover and draw upon the resources of their empires. ts still a very impressive series of conquests that have happened only a few times in history. Roman and Persian weakness doesn't change that.

@ghostd69

2 жыл бұрын

@@lordloss3398 And also the Plague you talking aboout happened after roman eas exiled from levante..its occured 639 it was called Plague of Amwas was just spread on south west levante..much excusss??

@Moemuntz

2 жыл бұрын

Indeed. These 3 are legends, their status only diminished only because they all existed at the same time and because Khalid was probably a another level of his own.

Looking at these videos gives me solace in the midst of the war in Ukraine, knowing that we as humans have been through so much war throughout history, and one day someone will be making a video about the Russo/Ukraine war of 2022.

Perfect video