This was a 5 star car in 2011 , fails because no auto brake and other accident avoid features , its more than just star rating for impact , give the full story not just the quarter story

@Sciron

5 жыл бұрын

Miky Koon it looks like it’s from 2004

@bmizzzzle

5 жыл бұрын

Song?

@marlexorama

5 жыл бұрын

Seems like pretensioners of seatbelts aren't working at all... look at the occupants' heads... they move all around with no safety at all. Driver's and passenger heads are hitting the door pillar, rear passengers' heads collide one each other... their necks always have scary angles... very very bad car

@dylanw4113

5 жыл бұрын

I heard it’s 0 stars because they have been hiring the passenger side on multiple cars for years and now that they are hitting driver side cars are starting to fail, automakers are designing their cars for the test kit for real scenario safety

@sonofwilliamchris

4 жыл бұрын

It was actually a four star car back in 2011 when it was launched. And there is no real reason it can't still be one in 2019... No... Wait... We have snowflakes, and without autonomous braking would probably kill someone while they text and drive. The 0 is actually for the surroundings like people and other cars.

Era meglio il pandino senza airbag ma con padre pio sul cruscotto

@litaliano3755

5 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂 grande

@wonnozline4094

4 жыл бұрын

Hahahahahah vero, io avevo il santino nel cruscotto e quando l'ho distrutta non mi sono ferito gravemente.....

@claudiocarbone2225

4 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣

@cozzaronero

4 жыл бұрын

Padre Pio funziona meglio di un airbag, l'ho provato sulla mia pelle

@no_name9942

4 жыл бұрын

NON SO CHE DIRE AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Why 0? I've seen worst cases with better score.

@indrabendi3300

5 жыл бұрын

Agree

@dominikn.5940

5 жыл бұрын

They are the experts not you. Stfu

@axvarela

5 жыл бұрын

@@dominikn.5940 When did I say I was an expert? I just made a simple and logic question.

@bymartu511

5 жыл бұрын

Idk, but i would like to have some answers

@jacobrivasjr

5 жыл бұрын

omg same I've seen Ford trucks that crumble and they got like 4 stars

James May is not happy

@davidr7_

5 жыл бұрын

Hammond is

@farmoboy83

5 жыл бұрын

He rides motorbikes so any car is safer. This One is probably safer than any 20years old car and similar to modern Cars of this size

@wiemxd3293

4 жыл бұрын

*Am Better*

The passengers structure didn't move an inch, which is very unusual for such small cars. Reward: Zero stars. Ridiculous!

@aidan1585

2 жыл бұрын

The passenger compartment of the Panda remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings of driver chest compression indicated weak protection of this body area. Test results showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies. FIAT showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, dummy readings indicated weak protection of the head and neck. Protection of the chest was marginal. Dummy readings of rear passenger chest compression led to a low score for this body region, and this was further penalised because of high shoulder belt loads, leading to the protection being rated as poor. Protection of the passenger's neck was also weak. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest was rated as marginal, based on readings of rib compression, with other critical body regions being well protected. No pole test was conducted. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection. The Panda is not equipped with an autonomous emergency braking system.

@danendraarvareswara5584

2 жыл бұрын

@@aidan1585 Also, the first frontal offset crash test, you can see the dummy's head hit the middle pillar of the car which increases the risk of head injuries, if the curtain airbags were deployed, that would've minimalize the risk of head injury. The side impact also scores bad due to the occupants on the back seat contacted each other, which could cause an injury i think. And the full width barrier crash test also proves that the dummy's kinematic is pretty bad considering the dummy's head faces upwards and increasing the potential of neck injuries, the headrest should've been reinforced and designed to not move in a series of a collision.

@serenan920

Жыл бұрын

Ncap nonsense

The structure of the car held up very well. Just because it doesn't have the latest and greatest safety crap, doesn't mean the vehicle is not safe!

@mrroom5965

2 жыл бұрын

Esattamente...

@Elsosaxddd

Жыл бұрын

Lo importante son la personas,ahí se ve claramente que los dummies se golpearon mal la cabeza

@francesconani7360

Жыл бұрын

True I totally agree

@cheeseninja3063

Жыл бұрын

The fact that the structure of the car held up is the exact reason it is not safe. The entire point is to slow deceleration of the vehicle. The more sudden a vehicle decelerates the faster the passengers are moving inside the vehicle. When that happens, the same thing occurs to your internal organs.

@costantinoleo2970

11 ай бұрын

Da un giocattolo Fiat cosa si può pretendere di più?

Let’s be serios ...Why “zero “ stars ? Because does’nt have the lane assist ,autonomous system and all that safety feature ? This car it cost under 10.000 € ,what do you expect ? I don’t understand ...the structure is good,the body of the car as well. It’s not fair. I see cars with 3 and 4 stars but much more worst than this Panda.

@captainuki

5 жыл бұрын

Have you read PDF report? Guess not...

@jerrylin9798

3 жыл бұрын

Dodge Challenger scores marginal in front offset and the legs get stuck afterwards

@TheNiki4997

2 жыл бұрын

For example, the belt forces are WAY TO HIGH and lead to a non acceptable sternum deflection -> fatal injury to internal organs. The problem could've been solved with belt-load limiters, which Fiat obviously didn't dimension correctly.

@indiourameshi5297

3 ай бұрын

In ITALY this car is fair expensive for what you get. Andits not 10 k but 20k

I wonder how many pandas have been hurt during filming of these tests 🐼🐼🐼

@Rudis_Garage

5 жыл бұрын

Too few.....

@ApoNiApoTu

5 жыл бұрын

Not so funny..btw good try...

@jacobrivasjr

5 жыл бұрын

lmfao good comment

@lilcuteli5843

5 жыл бұрын

WWF isn't working much

@HeLow005

5 жыл бұрын

Only one....

€ 10.000 car. Long 3.65 m and large 1.65m. Rated 0 stars because no Adas technologies. For that price... What do you want?? Explain the reason of the rate!!!. Mistificators!

@gabryst2945

5 жыл бұрын

€7.500 in italy

@captainuki

5 жыл бұрын

Watch the video... Passanger got bounced back by airbag instead of slowing speed down... That means large G forces for passanger

@000577Nokia

5 жыл бұрын

Giusto così, una macchina ormai obsoleta che va rimossa dal mercato, trovetemi altre auto della stessa categoria di altri marchi con 0 stelle.

@davidepanella7079

4 жыл бұрын

@@000577Nokia vediamo se riprovano la volswagen up cosa succede!

@mickdick1138

4 жыл бұрын

ADAS has been proven to save millions of lives. It has no rear airbags so the rear passengers will get hurt.

Very strong body, the windshield didn't crack.

@CalebT007

5 жыл бұрын

It did if you see closely

@Sufian95

5 жыл бұрын

Made in Italy.

@robertoorsi5771

4 жыл бұрын

@@Sufian95 Made in Fiat, that's now is a NL company.

@antoniowakardo7280

4 жыл бұрын

@@robertoorsi5771 Fiat is NL?

@ilpatongi

4 жыл бұрын

@f p They surely don't build them in Italy

00:22 Salutes, commrade.

@anonymoushd9710

3 жыл бұрын

Ahahahahahah

@322_.

3 жыл бұрын

=)))

That's a despicable way of ruining an excellent car's reputation. It is stracturaly perfect, it performs great on the tests and only gets 0 stars because it doesn't have electronic aids.

@nickfoord750

3 жыл бұрын

It’s zero stars because the occupants will be seriously injured or even dead. Look at their necks on impact.

@dimosk7389

3 жыл бұрын

@@nickfoord750 so it was perfectly safe when it first got out, but now somehow they make it less safe? How? Did the human body got weaker over a few years and can't withstand a crash? No, they just made the criteria harder, so older cars (which got 4 or 5 stars) are now considered "dangerous".

@nickfoord750

3 жыл бұрын

@@dimosk7389 because the tests have got more stringent. There is more to it than how the car deforms. The airbags were next to useless. Look at the dummies necks on impact. One of the dummies heads struck the b-pillar. As technology advances so do the tests. If the test get more advanced then that is surely a good thing as it enables manufacturers to improve. It’s like saying an iPhone 1 is better than an IPhone 11. Stop living in the past.

@dimosk7389

3 жыл бұрын

@@nickfoord750 that's what I said more or less. Of course it's better for us that the tests are harder. But what I am saying is that, if a car was safe in 2015, then it is practically equally safe in 2020. It's not like it was 30 years ago. It's just that the demands of the new tests are much harder. The results would probably be the same if they tested a 5 years old vw polo today. It would probably perform equally bad. But they somehow choose to test only older cars of other manufacturers

@nickfoord750

3 жыл бұрын

@@dimosk7389 just live with it. Things have changed and they are now highlighting the Pandas weakness. You can’t give four or five stars to a car which performs badly compared to a newer car which also has five stars ( which the latest Polo has in EU at least) it had fell down the rankings for a reason. Even if it had assistance systems I doubt it would go further than one or two stars.Yes the Pandas safety is still the same as it was five years ago, but because tests can highlight issues better the Panda fails badly. END OF.

There are many reasons for which it's still the most sold car in Italy, even if it hasn't changed in the last nine years.

What an amazing car. Simple, cheap, strong, easy to do fix, good engine, everlasting.

@ilpatongi

4 жыл бұрын

Not really

@YourAssAintSafe

4 жыл бұрын

Fiat everlasting 😂😂

@davide1143

4 жыл бұрын

Your ass ain't safe you clearly know nothing about the Panda

@martinocipriani8771

4 жыл бұрын

@@YourAssAintSafe stupid

@andresr.viguera9791

4 жыл бұрын

@@YourAssAintSafe Jokes on you. My mom owned a Fiat Uno that lasted for 18 years of consrant driving

I can't see how it's 0 star car. Used to be more then that when it came out. The structure is rigid. A pillar retains original shape. Occupant heads don't bash against anything hard like glass or interior trim. So what the hell? Do they expect it to have autonomous braking for this price? Those stars don't tell you nothing nowadays. Only make good cars look like bloody death traps. I prefered the ratings before the last alterations. I do realize they have to evolve but they are not authoritative anymore. Imagine a fucking golf buggy undergoing the same test. What would it score? The same - 0 stars, not negative 15 stars like the logic would suggest... There was a moment a few years ago when 80% of new cars or more had 5 star ratings. Maybe that wasn't perfect as well but guess what? Cars have become very safe nowadays and have been for some time.

@captainuki

5 жыл бұрын

Blazej watch at 1:14 ... The airbag isn't doing what it supposed to do... absorb the energy and slowing speed down... It just bounced the passanger back...

Driving assistence bias... This car performe much better than most of 2/3 stars cars with fancy electronic devices...

@ilpatongi

4 жыл бұрын

Big nope

@titfortat5727

4 жыл бұрын

Exactly

@ilpatongi

4 жыл бұрын

@@titfortat5727 Exactly what. The panda is absurdly inept for today standards. It's terrifying even in slow traffic

@titfortat5727

4 жыл бұрын

@@ilpatongi today standards are pathetic,..i bit that a vw up with all sensors and devices, isn't solid like the panda, and on city traffic is perfect you really talk just cause you have a tongue.

@ilpatongi

4 жыл бұрын

@@titfortat5727 No I talk because I had a panda. Never again, one of the worst cars I've ever driven and it hasn't changed... It's not secure, it's not fun to drive, it's not even something you would buy if you'd actually try it instead of talking nonsense just because you're defending a stupid car company. Repairs are expensive and parts themselves are even more expensive, there's no technology, not even an option when buying it, the stereo system sucks ass and if you want more than the bodge basic version it gets real pricy real fast... There's nothing desirable in a Fiat, just look at the 595 or 695 and their habit to roll over...

My dad had the old version of Panda built in 1970 with the Virgin Mary sticker on the dashboard, it saved more lives than modern airbags.

@massimomare2575

3 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@nickfoord750

3 жыл бұрын

Only started building them in 1980

The only reason I won’t drive this car apart from the rating is that I don’t want to hit a fat dab before I die as u can see in 0:20

@amysilva8589

5 жыл бұрын

Lol ik

@michelangeloboldri9893

4 жыл бұрын

The rating is because... IT scored in 2011. And back than there weren't so many stupid "auto brake" features

It looks to be doing pretty ok in all those videos. I used to have a Panda, and I'm still alive, so it must be good :)

Despite the lack of safety features the car body reacted pretty decently to front and side impact. Interior occupants may have some little injuries and broken bones but they probably would survive. I daily drive a Panda in my job they're affordable, good fuel economy especially very little making this good in city traffic. I personally like this car for daily routines and working activities.

@piotrmalewski8178

3 жыл бұрын

I hit a tree at 60kph in the earlier Panda model (169). I didn't even feel the hit, walked out completely uninjured, the factory garage had the car repaired in a week. This happened back in 2008, the car is still alive, drives me to work every day with no problems.

Why??? There are many car with worst structure

Put a Nokia on the glovebox and this car becomes 5 star

1:19 - RIP

Why 0? This car behaves surprisingly well on front and even side impacts. Better than I expected. It needs explanations.

@Kaczorex2678

3 жыл бұрын

1:19

Oltretutto, loro provano il modello base (Panda pop). Se provassero la panda lounge ( con 6 airbag e city brake) sarebbero costretti a dire che la superutilutaria numero 1, è alquanto sicura. Soprattutto ai tedeschi non piacerebbe sentirselo dire. È da tenere conto anche il fatto che la smart ha preso 5 stelle, senza avere gli airbag laterali (cosa che la panda può avere come optional!!). Gli italiani fanno con 15000 € ciò che gli altri fanno con 30000!!

I thought it did very well, I don't understand the 0

0:22 that dab though

It's still safer than any car with the same price range in my country

Structurally, the panda looks very strong. It is a great pity that FIAT do not invest in this car with the latest electronic kit.

Looked like it performed perfectly! Only crumpled in zones no cabin breach on any account . How is this 0 stars ?

@fluggaenkoecchicebolsen

2 жыл бұрын

@UC-a9PQtyYHwoRkL_aul2CDQ No it scored high in those areas, it failed because lack of modern driving safety assist features like auto brake, Lane departure warning.

@ramblingrob4693

2 жыл бұрын

@@fluggaenkoecchicebolsen Lane Departure Warning .. I'm not they test that on here..

La macchina mi sembra molto sicura invece.

@Mariano257

4 жыл бұрын

Infatti lo è, le stelle sono dovute alla mancanza degli adas

@Mariano257

4 жыл бұрын

@Manolo Deficiente sarai te, visto che non arrivi a capire che la valutazione non valuta la robustezza della scocca, ma la quantità di dispositivi elettronici e siccome la Panda non ha quasi nulla il punteggio è basso, ma non significa che non è sicura

@Justgreen89925

4 жыл бұрын

@@Mariano257 si ma da 9000€ di macchina cosa ti aspetti?

@Mariano257

4 жыл бұрын

@@Justgreen89925 Vai va, valla a comprare con 9000€ te li do io se la trovi per questo prezzo nuova. È poi se anche fosse dove sarebbe il problema?

IO VORREI CAPIRE COME SIA POSSIBILE CHE DA UN INIZIALE 3 STELLE VADA A 0.....A ME PUZZA MOLTO STA COSA DATO CHE I RISULTATI SONO 1000 VOLTE MIGLIORI RISPETTO ALLA 600🤔🤔🤬

Italians be like, don’t touch my pandino

@pixelbot1222

4 жыл бұрын

Urban Rush yes

Il Pandino mi ha salvato la vita in un incidente...altro che 0 stelle su 5

Weird how in 2011 you get out of the crash fine (4 stars) and in 2018 you're going to die... Maybe we're gerting weaker... or maybe euroncap is stupid

@rupafern

4 жыл бұрын

The reason is that the old one had relitavely okay safety features but now it's missing out on all that.

@siraff4461

4 жыл бұрын

To presume nothing has changed in 8 years is a bit dim at best. 0 stars doesn't mean you can't survive some accidents - it just means it won't protect you when the other new designs with more stars would. Back then if it didn't completely fold and had airbags it got a good mark. Now we expect it to control the movements and forces on the occupants along with being safer for pedestrians and having some basic ability to attempt to avoid an accident in the first place. If you want to know how important those last two things are for stopping people getting hurt try getting insurance quotes for two identical cars - one with assists and one without.

@handymccoaster3759

4 жыл бұрын

@@siraff4461 how would lane assist protect you if you still hit the wall?

@siraff4461

4 жыл бұрын

@@handymccoaster3759 Thats the point - in a lot of situations LA would mean you wouldn't hit the wall at all. Its the difference between active safety and passive safety. If you don't value something stopping you having an accident in the first place why don't you drive around with your eyes closed?

Let me guess.... No lane assist ? They get into all the trouble crash testing it while they know it doesnt have electronic gimmicks which will give it 0 stars anyway... dutch logic

@gabryrc9439

5 жыл бұрын

NGT it cost 7500€

@ngt84

5 жыл бұрын

@@gabryrc9439 Oh really ? I thought i counted 3 cars, and propably it took a week to prepare and measure all the stuff... Dutch Salary around 6000 euros per month brutto...(at least) how many workhours did they spent ? make the calculations. Oh btw i worked for TNO at a different sector...

I met a person who had an accident with this car, he has 13 nails on his knee. I saw the picture of the x-ray plate and it was shocking. Always verify the room that you have in front of your knees when you buy a car and keep the regulation of your seat in order to have room. He is luky he didn't lose the leg.

@serenan920

Жыл бұрын

How fast was he going?

I'm not sure why this was considered such a failure. The passenger compartment remained rigid in the small-overlap test, with little deformation, and that's usually the worst crash type.

@cheeseninja3063

Жыл бұрын

Probably the forces of sudden deceleration compared to cars that have bigger crumple zones.

My old Fiat Panda from 1995 doesn't even have the airbag

This car scored five stars in 2011. Just this

One of the few crash tests I have seen where the roof structure remains intact and the driver's door does not burst open. Even the windscreen is intact. Zero stars simply because of the lack of brake assist and lane divergence warning which seems unfair on a budget vehicle.

@chewthegum

Жыл бұрын

It also has 50% for occupant protection.. which is absolutely terrible.. in fact I think its the worst occupant protection Ncap has ever tested. 0 stars well deserved.

Deserves 4 stars 🌟🌟🌟🌟 Old Ncap Security Standard

Best selling car in Italy, does NOT deserve such a low score

Just checked out previous Euroncap's reports about Panda MY 2004 and MY 2011 Now...I could suspect even a case of sales manipulation by using this crash test and the related video Basic automobile knowledge and a bit of visual observation on how the car behaves during the test,are more than enough to understand that zero stars is just a fake result

@aidan1585

2 жыл бұрын

You're telling us that not having belt pretensioner belt loadlimiter in the back, like a car from the 1980's. A 1997 Volkswagen Golf has those two features. You obviously don't know a lot about crash testing. The passenger compartment of the Panda remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings of driver chest compression indicated weak protection of this body area. Test results showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies. FIAT showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, dummy readings indicated weak protection of the head and neck. Protection of the chest was marginal. Dummy readings of rear passenger chest compression led to a low score for this body region, and this was further penalised because of high shoulder belt loads, leading to the protection being rated as poor. Protection of the passenger's neck was also weak. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest was rated as marginal, based on readings of rib compression, with other critical body regions being well protected. No pole test was conducted. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection. The Panda is not equipped with an autonomous emergency braking system.

@serenan920

Жыл бұрын

Must be some back handers

This crash test is sponsored by Volkswagen?

@greekcitroeniste8232

4 жыл бұрын

Επιτέλους ένας άνθρωπος που βρίσκω που λέει την αλήθεια. Ότι το euroncap είναι προϊόν των γερμανών. Δεν γίνεται το Fabia να έχει 5 αστέρια και το C3 ή το νέο 208 να έχουν 4...

@Manuel-zc7po

3 жыл бұрын

@@greekcitroeniste8232 wut

That driver head control on the full frontal barrier - yikes. Your neck vertebrae are toast should your head snap like that

Que carro bem construido , caramba.

0:21 we salute you back, fellow comrade

Great! Where can I get one?

Naah i would still buy

I don't think this disurves a 0 star rating a 3 or 4 would be suitable

What 0 stars what wtf

0:22. Kid doing his final salute

@guglielmo5986

3 жыл бұрын

underrated comment

Car looks stable, it has 4 airbag, then why 0 star, may not be structurally stable , may be it's size

@alessiobonamini1792

5 жыл бұрын

Apart ABS, it hasn't any other security sistem

@dexgeta.9940

5 жыл бұрын

@@alessiobonamini1792 it's a true car, also ugly as hell.

@gabryst2945

5 жыл бұрын

@@alessiobonamini1792 SRC, ESP and citybrake control?

@alessiobonamini1792

5 жыл бұрын

Sorry for my misunderstanble response, I should have said that it has security sistems that aren't in line with the actual technology. What I'm trying to say is the other cars on the market have much more effective sistems. Sorry for my first response.

@captainuki

5 жыл бұрын

Can you all please take a look at video ... It seems you are not looking it at all... Dummies behave badly in a crash test... Look at the front full width riged barrier test ... It is sad... For all passangers...

Golf 8 sportello posteriore che si apre, 5 stelle. I tedeschi non si tolgono le stelle 😂😂😂 a già questa non è tedesca

@lis756

3 жыл бұрын

Esatto!!!! ho visto crash test di auto conciate molto peggio della panda ed avere molte piu' stelle, venduti!!!!!Ciao

@emanuelepavesio6180

3 жыл бұрын

Non è quello, è la mancanza di tecnologie atte a prevenire incidenti (lane assist e frenata automatica d'emergenza) che ha penalizzato fortemente la Panda. Le regole attuali per l'attribuzione delle stelle si basano marcatamente sulla presenza di tecnologie anticollisione.

@lis756

3 жыл бұрын

@@emanuelepavesio6180 A ecco non lo sapevo, bella stronzata, secondo me sti ingegneri hanno pensato troppo a studiare solo nel loro settore ma non hanno un briciolo di logica...Ciao

@fabrynascar1188

3 жыл бұрын

@@emanuelepavesio6180 ok, ma perché rifare il crash test alla panda ed alla Punto?

@andreacontini9018

3 жыл бұрын

Concordo,sempre loro a sminuire i prodotti altrui e gonfiare i loro,stanno facendo auto di merda sempre più scarse e criticano gli altri,ricordo quando fecero un frontale tra una q7 ed una 500! Buffoni!!!

0:22 Lit 🔥🔥💯💯

@AsterFSK

3 жыл бұрын

DOE!

Its cool that you show the footage, but could you guys explain the results?

Euro NCAP mafia

0 stars because no advanced safety system's... That's how mafia works!

@Manuel-zc7po

3 жыл бұрын

Pls don't joke about that, it's a serious thing for who buy this car

James may loves this car.

F ❗ 4 7 💛❤️💙 P 4 N D 4 2011 body 2018 test 👏👏 ?? why not when there is panda aeb ? 🐼 I believe in the eye, not the star, the panda cage is safe. The only problem is that the models are strangely accelerating downwards.🛡️ 😎🏅 ✅ Do not forget to test other cars for 8 years.🤨

Jesus Tony’s finna have a field day

0:22 hardest dab detected

3 crashes, all three windshields survived without a crack. For me its more like 5 stars

Just because it has no accident avoid features, brilliant little car the panda, we where brought up with no airbags or collapsable zones like the panda has, any way if all the other cars have accident avoid electrical features why does the panda need one, no one will ever run into it lol.

The Citroen e-mahari was way worse to be fair

What about the old panda?

Did the passenger airbag burst?

the fiat panda should deserve at least 1 star for effort

It seems very safe in video

1:00

0 stars but this car has a max speed like 180km/h. How is possible?

It looks safe but I'll probably die

I had a big rollover accident at 120km/h some years ago with this car, and I didn't suffer any serious injuries. For the car that presents itself it is very safe.

Why it got 0. It was extremely strong

it's a shame. I love this cute car

@Razar244

4 жыл бұрын

Living in Italy I've seen some accidents with these cars (Since they are so common here) and they have more or less the same level of protection of cars with higher prices but with similar size. Reason why it got 0 stars here is because it doesn't have any automatic safety systems, but what do you expect for a car that's sold at under 10.000€ honestly.

Reason number 10 for my grandma to not buy a panda in substition of her 97 cinquecento

The car did a good job protecting the passengers. The cell didnt collaps. No difference in the footage to cars with 5 star rating. You cannot give a car 0 stars just because it doesnt have 100 electric helpers like autobrake, esp and other expensive bullshit. This is a budget car. They should only rate how it protect when hitting a barrier. Fucking bullshit. I want to drive like a men and not a car that tells me what to do and blinks and beeps every second cause i didnt maintine my lane for a second or tailgait someone for a moment.

I once read on forums that Fian and EuroNCAP had an argument. That may explain why so many of the new Fiats are rated so low.

The impact actually was not that bad and the airbags were fine as well as no a piller deformation!!

A moment of silence for who uses fiat panda

@vincenzonovi5528

2 жыл бұрын

I don't need it, thank you.

It’s all about common sense when buying a car. I bought a 2015 Panda brand new but even with the 2011 rating it’s clear a lightweight small car isn’t as safe as a bigger car. I knew that before I bought it but have a bigger car as well. I only use the panda for my work commute on slower 30mph and 40mph roads and the bigger safer car on the motorway. The car is much safer than a motorbike and half the people criticising will drive their BMWs and Audi’s like idiots anyway.

Perfeito. Não houve sequer danos estruturais graves. Tem carros mais caros e piores.

0:56 headbutt

I've never seen a panda flying

I'd sooner be in my panda in a 50kmh inpact than be on my mororbike, or on a public bus, or be a pedestrian....

That bloody music

The "Kung Fu" version would get 5 stars! 😂

@fidelcatsro6948

5 жыл бұрын

thats a nice cat picture!

@speedking1353

5 жыл бұрын

@@fidelcatsro6948 - 😊 Thanx! Cheers

@fabricbond4321

5 жыл бұрын

Ha ha!! Kung Fu Panda! Nice one😂

A very strong car! I have one myself!

@portman8909

Жыл бұрын

LOL

Holy moly

that dummy hits on the dab pretty hard at 0:21

I own this exact version just a 2017 plate and I have owned it for 3 years and I have only just found this video... 😳

@theblitz1687

3 жыл бұрын

drive slow and carefully youll be ok

5 stars in 2011.

Do not see why it gets 0. Doors still look they can open, roof is undamaged and not kinked.

0:22 hello comrade :d

No Star > All

Italyans:noooooo mamma mia

@kevindipre8857

3 жыл бұрын

Italian cars is shit from italy 💩🇮🇹

Talvez seria melhor testar com o motor funcionando pq vai que explode?

the glass didn't shatter either

No real panda was hurt during this movie.