Join our KZread or Patreon Membership for early access videos: kzread.info/dron/uXCgyOCMXic7j0_wghXnRA.htmljoin www.patreon.com/user?u=35130109&fan_landing=true&view_as=public

@aklapotherpotherpothikrebh603

8 ай бұрын

Can you make a video about Evolution of helicopter?

@CFox.7

8 ай бұрын

The crass language...really ? You think you're cool or trying to appeal to a 10 year old demographic ?

@valyshknee4203

8 ай бұрын

wowww the pro-ukrainian stuff at the end really set me off, you clearly know nothing about the conflict, and you seem to not know or care that atleast quarter of your subs do not share your opinion, most of the world does not support Ukraine you know? most of the world's population support Russia, majority Africa, central asia, middle east, parts of south america, parts of the carribean, most of Asia and of course Russia itself, you are really shooting yourself in the foot with this even though Ukraine is losing the war.

@unsuisseegare1291

8 ай бұрын

@@valyshknee4203 www.economist.com/media-assets/image/20220409_WOT949.png just look at the map...

@VEAFY

8 ай бұрын

T-34 Ukrainian tank or Soviet but not russian.

Im surprised how they can make something so terrifying used in quite a lot of wars look so cartoonish.

@sussyb1471

9 ай бұрын

Yea, that Mark I tank kinda cute tho😂

@adhiesive

9 ай бұрын

War is a game. Yet people still play it

@banielshow6424

9 ай бұрын

Viva lé France, Napoléon

@retrogamer545

9 ай бұрын

Tanks are not terrifying they are cool

@ch-53esuperstallion76

9 ай бұрын

@@retrogamer545well the enemy will be terrified

You guys can't just show up every couple of months and drop an absolute masterpiece each time.

@pitaalfereti58

9 ай бұрын

I know right!?

@wellina3457

9 ай бұрын

I totally agree with you 👍🏾

@CraffleZ

9 ай бұрын

real

@Schregger

9 ай бұрын

And yet, they do! Like fucking Call of Duty!

@angryasfman9077

9 ай бұрын

real

I really like the styling of these videos! After watching, I think some other tanks should have been mentioned such as: - Vezdekhod (First motorised armoured tank prototype) - Renault FT tank (First tank to have a fully rotating turret) - Char 2C (Largest operational tank)

@Kammerjagerr

2 ай бұрын

Isnt the tsar tank the biggest operational tank?

@federovsquared5646

Ай бұрын

@@Kammerjagerr I don't even know if that even classifies as a tank 🤣

@Kammerjagerr

Ай бұрын

@@federovsquared5646 Everyone else calls it a tank 🤷‍♂️

@federovsquared5646

Ай бұрын

​@@Kammerjagerr Probably because calling it an armoured fighting vehicle is too long of a name.

@johnsonknight1120

Ай бұрын

The Renault FT-17 is mentioned in the World War I video.

Уже увидели леопард и Абрамс, горят очень даже хорошо!

@jokerkot4759

28 күн бұрын

Очень хорошо горят

@Serious_Artom

21 күн бұрын

Да

@OmarGarcia-kr4jz

4 күн бұрын

@@jokerkot4759you mean be shot by 1 round and not burn?

A shame that the FT-17 wasn't mentioned considering how it was the first tank that looked like what we think of as a tank. All the same though, this is really awesome, and I hope to see more of this in the future.

@andyboi8399

9 ай бұрын

Yep, I agree, FT-17 set the benchmark for all modern tanks to come, and it was a superb light tank of the period too. Plus it's soo damn Cute! I just want to hug it and pet it on the turret, such a good boy.

@mrman5666

9 ай бұрын

it was the first mass produst turret tank but lil willy did have a turret.but yay why no ft17.

@viski2528

9 ай бұрын

It is a very, very watered down history of the tank.

@nitsu2947

9 ай бұрын

I mean the FT-17 was the first to have been set up like the modern tanks we know. Surely didn't look like it, however the driver front, combat center and engine back was pioneered by the FT-17

@andrefasching1332

9 ай бұрын

they also forgot about the austrian "Burstyn Motorgeschütz" from 1911/12 It was even designed for crossing trenches and had a rotatable turret. In my eyes the only true first tank

You guys need to publish an RTS game using these models as assets. I would play the hell out of this.

@sharroYT

9 ай бұрын

Same, I love rts game especially modern military ones

@nozzatron01gaming11

9 ай бұрын

or make model kits of them, that would be amazing

@optimised120

9 ай бұрын

@@nozzatron01gaming11oooooh 3d printer time lol 😂

@somegdplayer4039

9 ай бұрын

I think in their patreon have models of things used to people who want to print them, not sure

@ranggars_

9 ай бұрын

nice idea

05:18 "you can barbaross all the way back to where you came from"💀💀💀

I absolutely need a tank game with this kind of style, commentary and all Also im glad you pointed out the panther naming thing cuz i find it really weird, hopefully this version doesnt have any reliability issues lmao

@mr.flupsurf2860

3 ай бұрын

there was a game like this, but dont know the name anymore.

@Alphatrillon

Ай бұрын

​@@mr.flupsurf2860shield wall

Great video. But kinda sad that the Renault FT-17 wasn't mentioned here. It's the first tank to have a rotating turret. Can't imagine how modern tanks would look like without it.

@Canofasahi

9 ай бұрын

And not only that, it was also the most produced tank from the Great War, 3700 of them, that's more than the Germans and Brits combined. Another thing they missed, Czechoslovakia had a decent tank production just before the war, the Germans used quite a lot of Panzer 35(t)'s and 38(t)'s well into 1941 until their own tank production finally caught up!

@_MaitreuPanda___

9 ай бұрын

It's the father of modern tanks, as you said it had a rotating turret but it also had a compartment specially for the engine.

@Canofasahi

9 ай бұрын

@@_MaitreuPanda___ carbon monoxide poisoning was a serious issue in the early tanks.

@Yahtzee1

9 ай бұрын

Couldn't agree more. It set the standard for most tanks put into service: A fully rotating turret; driver in the front, fighting compartment in the middle and engine compartment in the rear. Absolute unit of a little tank.

@captainobvious8530

9 ай бұрын

Not surprising, this channel is anti-french for some reason

They can make a game with this style, and I'd buy it.

@CaptainMaxwell7

9 ай бұрын

Advanced Wars on the Gameboy. Good times.

@blockmg9425

9 ай бұрын

Deep inside we like cartoonish art style even in our 20s

@planenoises5236

9 ай бұрын

Same man it looks awesome.

@whispofwords2590

9 ай бұрын

Hell yeah!

@pixilatecat7680

9 ай бұрын

Same Thought it has Potential.

Russian tanks aren’t really that bad, they’re mostly being misused, but I really enjoy the animation and writing!

@simonhribsk.962

6 ай бұрын

Exactly

@rayotoxi1509

6 ай бұрын

The russian military dosent learn Same mistakes cann be seen from war in chechnya

@user-vl1me5vv2g

6 ай бұрын

​@@rayotoxi1509I from Russia and I think, for we haven't for massive motorised defender for drone and rocket, and many tank. USSR he got 12k, Russia got 1,2k-5k. That so small for large country.

@Rickcarleson2152

6 ай бұрын

​@@user-vl1me5vv2gspeak english.

@raketny_hvost

6 ай бұрын

​​@@rayotoxi1509yeah, Russians never learn, Napoleon and Hitler thought the same, but then justified themselves being crushed by winter (but not by bushes at least). but somehow T-72s survive drone attacks and get drone cages first. What happens with glorious leopards and other democratic coaches under focused attacks, remind me plz.

He fails to mention that the Abrams was also in Ukraine, and they are doing a hell of a lot worse than the Leopards.

@mekingtiger9095

Ай бұрын

Eh, this video was uploaded waaaaay before the Abrams tanks were deployed in Ukraine, cut the makers some slack.

@EmpanadaDeCaca

20 күн бұрын

@@mekingtiger9095 then don't make stupid assumptions or try to predict things about the war if they want to be cut some slack

@Zloy_moskovit23

17 күн бұрын

The authors did not forget to lick the US tanks 👎, the Shermans were burning then - especially against the Tigers, and now the Abrams are burning in Ukraine.

@spudgun3982

14 күн бұрын

@@Zloy_moskovit23 abrams doing fine

@wyomingboi69

12 күн бұрын

@@spudgun3982thank you for spreading truth my friend

Actually, the replaceability of the M4 was quite comforting to Allied tank crews as it was the American Sherman that was over engineered, particularly in service to maximizing crew survivability. Anecdotally, there was one particular crew that ended up losing 3 tanks to enemy action, only to return to base to pick up a new tank each time.

@duitk

9 ай бұрын

Only 2500 Sherman crew died in WW2. It has the best crew survival rates. The T34 was unreliable and killed it's crew. Probably the second most overrated tank ever after the Tiger. At the end of the day trained tankers are the most precious resource in armored warfare, the tank that protects that best is the best tank.

@LyonPercival

9 ай бұрын

Especially since T-34s usually don't have spall liners the whole WW2, a non-penetrating shot for a Sherman is a very deadly metal shatter to T-34 crews. Soviet crews were relatively expendable since they are easily replaced anyway.

@juryfilatov4520

9 ай бұрын

Just compare the numbers The Eastern Front had 6 million Germans and 9 million Soviet soldiers over the course of 4 years The United States had and the Allies landed 300 thousand soldiers in Normandy. At the same time, the operation was clearly planned by a member of the Kuklusklan movement

@massimookissed1023

9 ай бұрын

I've heard one British tank vet say that he was in his 5th tank when WW2 ended. He also said the British didn't get a decent tank until *_after_* the war.

@eugeneoliveros5814

9 ай бұрын

@@duitkreminder that the Soviets put the fuel tanks in the fighting compartment to either side of the driver, which is less then ideal when you get hit

I was hoping for the french tanks to be mentioned like the Renault FT that was a game changer to ww1 that after the war, many nations learned from the Renault's design as it serves the basics of tank designs

@aurelienthietard7636

9 ай бұрын

Don t expect to much of a channel that potrayed us as coward in a different video French bashing is still a thing twenty years after iraq

@cottonbear2777

9 ай бұрын

@@aurelienthietard7636 hahaha

@l.a.wright6912

9 ай бұрын

With just how much it gets wrong I'm not suprised. Like how it never touches on the long barrel revolution and it mentions the importance whilst degrading the very tanks which inspired it. Or how it quite litterally makes it look like the maus was anything more than 2 prototypes and actually saw service (neither of which is true and if we compare it to other german prototype programs it's obvious how little attention it was given). Or how it perpetuates myths about german manufacturing (which is sad because the importance of allied bombings and the supply situation almost never gets stated) Honestly I might have to do a full writeup.

@emilianoiphone

9 ай бұрын

The 2c bis and charmond too

@louisdedieu4662

9 ай бұрын

It's crazy, he completely swept the French subject...

Как же иронично весь этот нахрюк на бэбрамсы выглядит в свете недавних событий

@user-xx6lj2jx2o

Ай бұрын

без нахрюка никуда, всё таки хорошо что у них есть только мультики

@lambogikka7039

Ай бұрын

Читаешь мысли) Ток хотел про этот анимационный высер написать...

@montecarlo2684

Ай бұрын

Не, ну про отлетающие башни, превратившиеся в доп. артиллерию реально смешно.

@lambogikka7039

Ай бұрын

@@montecarlo2684 Смешно будет нам, когда ты гавно будешь 5ый угол искать после захода Русских в Авдеевку.

@user-hk1qn9ue2t

Ай бұрын

Ну, вот такая у них пропаганда...

I love how he is so educational yet still say stuff like "They can copy and paste tank name strait from ww2 like it a fucking call of duty game" GOD I love them. keep up the good work.

Wish you guys had mentioned the Centurion being the first MBT, and the FT-17 for basically defining what the modern tank should look like and function.

@alexeievgenievich5556

9 ай бұрын

Согласен, странно что ещё Леклерк не упомянули. Самый технологичный танк запада того времени.

@petrf-rw4pw

8 ай бұрын

Первый ОБТ - советский Т-64

@Vanadium

8 ай бұрын

@@alexeievgenievich5556 Первым основным боевым танком мог стать "Центурион" или "Пантера".

@Kizen-fm8up

8 ай бұрын

​@@petrf-rw4pwcenturion was made 1946

@neoknight9180

8 ай бұрын

@@petrf-rw4pwthat’s not even the first soviet MBT bro

The Sherman was one of the easiest tanks to escape from uninjured if it was destroyed, so that was of great comfort to the crews.

@cardiv5zuikaku944

9 ай бұрын

Adding the fact that is bassicaly like a limousine for the crew considering the standard of the time

@brennanleadbetter9708

9 ай бұрын

That’s one of the reasons why Soviet tankers who had Shermans preferred it over the T-34.

@gaetantreib4163

9 ай бұрын

Yep, but it use very inflamable fuel and the shell compartment where not very well protected. Not for nothing that one of the sherman nickname was bronson. Shermans was just super easy to blew up.

@Gran-knight9815

9 ай бұрын

​@gaetantreib4163 early shermans were prone to becoming bonfires however 1943 onward they were just as likely to set alight as another tank.

@cardiv5zuikaku944

9 ай бұрын

@@gaetantreib4163 isnt its called "Ronson" not "Bronson" also that is only used post war. Also sherman is not that easy to blew up, study says they have similar explosion rate to other tanks of similar class or size at the time (Except the one british used as they have the brightest idea to overload the tank with ammo and still wonder why their tanks explosing everywhere) even an account from Russian that have Hero of the Soviet honor that use Sherman says he was pinned down while using his Sherman once from german attacks but his Sherman survives despite receiving multiple hits.

I've only just discovered this channel. Love the art style! I instantly imagined collecting all those boxy tanks

“Yes you can leave a comment” “And no we will not read it” Lmaoo😂

I’m sad you guys didn’t mention one of the best tanks from WW1 (and my personal favorite) the French FT-17 Rennault, it was one of the first tanks that looked like a modern tank (outward treads, single barrel on a turret that was either a 8mm machine gun or a 37mm cannon), and one of the first mass produced tanks, but nevertheless great video!

@manofironthathasntturnedcr9817

9 ай бұрын

I think you made a mistake. The Renault was armed with either a single barrel cannon or a machine gun. We hadn’t really figured out how to put those two together at the time, and it’s not like there was enough space in the turret anyway.

@Mr_Metro

9 ай бұрын

@@manofironthathasntturnedcr9817 Thank you for pointing that out, I had meant to say that but I forgot to fix that line of text when I rewrote this like 5 times, I’ll fix it now

@CascouPrime

9 ай бұрын

afterwards, I think Mitsi doesn't like French, given the treatment they had in previous videos

@adddaddda7748

9 ай бұрын

@@CascouPrime In which video ? It's a real shame, if for such a reason, they didn't mention France at all in this video. I mean that country is kinda a pioneer in tank developpement.

@forters7613

6 ай бұрын

@@adddaddda7748 in the video where they prtray how different countries fight, France shows up and instead of... idk Napoleon's grand armee, or ww1 french soldiers, or hell even the french resistance in 1940, they just showed a stereotypical french dude waving a white flag at the first sign of trouble. I wasn't surprised afterwards that the FT wasn't even mentionned in this video considering the previous french bashing...

Im quite disappointed that they failed to mention the Rennault tank the French were fielding during WW1. Their design basically inspired future tank designs in the following years of history. Edit: Eyyy why people fighting in my comments?

@F.O.U.N.D.E.R

9 ай бұрын

The author hates French and russians

@TamanskayaDivision

9 ай бұрын

The animation is gold, however the writting is really, really bad. It feels like they copy & pasted some biased british/american article, inserted some old myths and as you said above, completely forgot about the really important designs like the FT-17, T-55 and the introduction of ERAs.

@TrafficTheCone

9 ай бұрын

they post like every month, if you aren't satisfied with it why are you watching em? if you want those many tanks watch a full tank documentary telling all the tanks in history, they aren't national geographic.

@curtis1552

9 ай бұрын

Yep, they even forgot to mention that the French had superior tanks during the start of WW2 but didn't know how to incorporate them in their armed forces.

@oogadyman5814

9 ай бұрын

@@TrafficTheConeyou not aloud to have a opinion ? He was not criticizing it he was just saying his opinion

The Sherman was amazing engineering. Not only did it succeed in all being effective in combined arms, anti-tank, it was relatively cheap, and mass-produceable. But it had one of the best features for a US produced tank, it was compact and easy to transport. Easily the biggest hurdle to getting a lot of tanks in the war is transporting them across the sea. For a tank that was built across the ocean, it performed very well compared to the home field advantage tanks that Germany and Russia fielded.

@m4shermanfan225

6 ай бұрын

Gaming

@lancepharker

6 ай бұрын

They also had a stabilized main gun, which was so top secret, that they... didn't distribute the manuals... to their own troops... sigh.

@raketny_hvost

6 ай бұрын

Sherman had it's faults for eastern Europe landscapes. However mediums often determined battlefields

@stepanchelli4295

5 ай бұрын

ahahha, ok )))

@robertoroberto9798

4 ай бұрын

@@lancepharkerThe good news is that if a crew/armoured division knew how to use it, then the Sherman just became even more effective on top of all the other factors. If the crew didn’t know how to use the stabilizer, then the Sherman would be on par with other tanks instead of being worse.

Брэдли и Леопард 2. Отличное оборудование для разминирования. На очереди Абрамс

Its honestly amazing how much effort we put into destroying eachother.

@SSgtJ0hns0n

9 ай бұрын

You can bet when someone invents something new, some prick will pop up next to them asking two questions; 1. How can we kill people with this? 2. How can this help to make things more comfortable for the lives of MY people who are going out to kill OTHER people?

@colelinse6196

9 ай бұрын

Its a bit more natural than you think

@WG55

9 ай бұрын

The key is to put more effort into killing your enemy than your enemy is putting into killing you.

@jurajsintaj6644

9 ай бұрын

Well, simply put, if the other guy has a sharp stick, then you need a sharp rock on a stick, because otherwise he can come over and steal your stuff. Humans can operate well in groups, but groups rarely work together if it's not against something else.

@sturmgeschutze3070

9 ай бұрын

@@WG55I’d argue the key is to put in more effort in the factory so the guys in the field put in none.

Good video but it's sad that France isn't mentioned when it was the first country to develop a "modern tank" with 360° turret and tracks, the succesful Renault FT-17. We had pretty nice design during the WWII and the Cold War too (B1 bis, AMX 13,...)

@latch9781

9 ай бұрын

FT is a critical development. Oscilating turrets can go straight to hell though

@b1bis204

7 ай бұрын

it's not a bad turret configuration the question is Why did we built Oscilation turrets? Oscilating turrets have his advantages like placement saver, smaller size and could on certain tanks equipped with autoloader so on lighter tanks ist an absolute monster killer (see the ebr in WT annoying) but on heavy tanks in another hand is pointless, poor elevation degrees @@latch9781

@calhounli9656

5 ай бұрын

​@@latch9781Oscillating turrets were the best design at that time, plus the French did come up with other amazing things during that time. In my opinion Amx 30 is also a superior counterpart than the German leopard 1.

@weaselwolf8425

4 ай бұрын

​@@latch9781Oscillating turrets wonky asf

@xXCharli03Xx

4 ай бұрын

​@@latch9781 Oscilating turrets were amazing, not by the design neither armor protection (which was not really good), but because they were the consequences of a really fast automatic reloading system.

Spoiler: Leopards burned out, but Abrams will never be delivered

@keithcraig506

Ай бұрын

This didn't age well.

@peterwolanyk3428

6 күн бұрын

@@keithcraig506the Abram’s are also burning in Ukraine

@keithcraig506

6 күн бұрын

@@peterwolanyk3428 And?

@peterwolanyk3428

6 күн бұрын

@@keithcraig506 You said it didn't age well, Abrams got delivered and they get destroyed just like every other tank.

@keithcraig506

6 күн бұрын

@@peterwolanyk3428 OP's prediction was that they would never be delivered. Obviously they were delivered. Thus, OP's prediction didn't age well (i.e. it was incorrect). No one said they were indestructible.

If you guys would ever make strategy game (CoH style like of base building and such) I would buy it in 100%. The style is so fun to watch.

With Mitsi, you are guaranteed to learn something new while cracking up laughing.

@Master10k2

9 ай бұрын

3:54 ... Definitely. XD

@blazed9346

9 ай бұрын

And enjoying US propaganda :D

How long have you guys been in the animation industry? This just feels extremely professional and well done. The details, everything having personality, effort spent everywhere not just on key stuff. It's really impressive, makes me think you guys will have a really good run over time.

@PopTap

7 ай бұрын

Watch their introduction video about themselves

@AL-Shorts_YT

3 ай бұрын

3 years

Cuanto sesgo político quieres en tu video? Mitsi Studio: si

So happy that this channel actually started to post, these things are so funny and interesting

I'm surprised the Centurion didn't get a mention, nor the Challenger 2. Good video, love the art style. Keep it up!

@mcstaal

9 ай бұрын

Or the Renault FT.

@arrowoneomega4649

9 ай бұрын

morser karl or shwerer gustav

@andybelcher1767

9 ай бұрын

Also, Little Willie never went to France and the A7V could fall over 🤣🤣🤣

@68poundercarronade

9 ай бұрын

​@@arrowoneomega4649those aren't tanks, they're artillery

@samwatson2373

9 ай бұрын

I thought that as well, re Centurion and Challenger series

You forgot to mention Jan Zizka, the Bohemian leader who was the first to successfully use war wagons as battle tanks to face the entire Holy Roman Empire armies without losing a single battle during the Hussite Wars.

@kazueballesteros3665

9 ай бұрын

Bohemia would might not survive the russo ukrainian war If it still existed ofc or uh survive by improving their tanks and smart soldiers

@kristopherdecker6549

9 ай бұрын

Or that dude with the elephants.

@kingcytoxien1775

9 ай бұрын

he cant show every tank that was shown to humans, its not a documentary

i love this animation style so much, it takes a dark truth and turns it into something funny and sort of cute with the colors and little round soldiers lol

I noticed you didn't want to give Germany any credit to their armor unless it was to rag on their "Over Engineering" or the impractical Wunderwaffe. 1940s Germany were absolutely top of the game in Tank design and kept upping the bar year after year, from the Pz.I to the Panther and King Tiger. (Pz.IV H is my favorite model)

@bibisbummsbude7223

4 ай бұрын

True Story

@Jump-Shack

4 ай бұрын

Good armor means nothing if you are getting outproduced by vehicles like the sherman or the T34 that can get larger guns that can go through the tiger 1 and similar

@Rek1emMScar

4 ай бұрын

Why? Germany was using flat armor when Angle was already confirme to be better... Wasn't until bastard trying to copy T-34 and make they own version that the panther was born. They only reason they tank look better at the start was because they're were the only one investing in going to war..

@Space_Muffin45

Ай бұрын

@@Rek1emMScargermans used flat armor to give bigger free space to crews and ammunition, while soviet tankers were cramped in small steel coffins barely being able to reload the germans had enough space to dance, also germans werent the only ones investing in going at war, soviets are basically red fascists they have fought finland, poland , baltics and japan to say that they didnt invest in warmachines because they werent interested at bloodshed is delusional

@Rek1emMScar

Ай бұрын

@@Space_Muffin45 You have a serious case of German bias .. If URSS tank were Small steel coffins. German were big and slow steel coffins. Not even bullshit crap like MAUS was safe. German steel was also trash mid-late war.. So wasting material in big useless shit was really stupid. Germany did have better Tank gun.. But their tank design was pathetic. Its fucking war. They where Delusional thinking big Wunderwaffen would win a war. Maybe they should have to perfect what the T-34 did for Soviets. But not because even the Panther was big as fuck. Panther is in the same weight class as IS2.. And is2 is still smaller and better protected. Not talk that you need almost two time the material to build 1 panther if you compare it to the T-34. YEA useless wunderwaffen shit and waste of material that they didn't have.

5:44 is my favorite part. That fading of the foreground to highlight the flying tank killed me

@Senior--Pomidor

9 ай бұрын

По задумке, эти танки должны были доставляться на транспортных самолётах в тыл немецких войск и объеденившись с силами ополчения СССР - "партизанами" наносить удары по немецким линиям снабжения, держу вкурсе

8:29 I agree and like how the way you tell that Ukraine were indeed just a giant testing ground

8:10 And we saw! **Footage of blown turrets of leopard tanks in Ukraine**

@ellez0ne

Ай бұрын

Abrams also flies off in the new addition

@Space_Muffin45

Ай бұрын

turrets blowing off leopards is a rare sight unlike russians they dont store ammo right under the turret ring

@user-no6bx2kv2n

Ай бұрын

​@@Space_Muffin45 If you don't understand russian, use Google translate Потому что в русских танках все делает автомат заряжания, а в американских голодный негр Джимми. И посреди боя Джимми могут ранить, контузить или убить. Или он может устать. Снаряды- то тяжёлые. А автомат заряжания всегда одинаково быстр. Как вы правильно отметили, башни наших танков подлетают вверх от любого пробития в башню. Но давайте будем честны. Если снаряд пробил башню - экипаж погиб. Что в Абрамс, что в т90. И да. Один Абрамс может быть лучше одного т90. Но у России танков все ещё в несколько раз больше, чем у остального мира. А, кстати ваши абрамсы и челенджеры немного тяжёлые. И застревают в украинской грязи. А ещё они больше и заметнее танков РФ.

@honkhonk8009

4 күн бұрын

@@ellez0ne No they dont. Its funny cus the interior is immaculate while the exterior looks like it was shit out the backend.

Tanks won't be obsolete, it'll adapt and improve over the years just like infantry and perhaps aircraft. People have said that since World War 1 yet main battle tanks are still relevant in the modern battlefield, albeit with improvements and newer technology.

@WolfeSaber9933

9 ай бұрын

It's just that Russia doesn't know how to use Soviet tanks. The KF-51 tank can smoke both tank and drone on the bbq.

@hanzkommandant

9 ай бұрын

@@WolfeSaber9933 Training is also key. Yes, your statement is somewhat correct.

@whispofwords2590

9 ай бұрын

​@@WolfeSaber9933Its not only that, but people seem to think that just because tanks are being destroyed that makes them obsolete. Engines of war will be destroyed in the course of their use just by being Engines of war. Doesnt matter what it is.

@warthoggoulags1679

9 ай бұрын

@@WolfeSaber9933 now they do, they didn't in the begining of the war

@theroundtable6371

9 ай бұрын

@@whispofwords2590 B-b-but MY countries MBT that isn't in Ukraine and has never saw combat against a conventional army would do SO much better guys, it has all these better traits, trust me!

Thanks! Once again, a great piece. Bravo, Mitsi !!!

@mitsistudio

9 ай бұрын

Awesome!!!

@darkleaf5167

9 ай бұрын

u wrong Italian tanks are the best Edit: I love it when I make stupid nonsense statements, people dumber than my comment come along to attack something so obvious. Xdddd

@ApacheBruv

9 ай бұрын

​@@darkleaf5167The only thing better about Italian tanks is that the reverse is faster than forward.

@Accountlyut

9 ай бұрын

@@ApacheBruvAnd smoll look cute

@asaifaji4490

9 ай бұрын

​@@mitsistudiocan you do magic? I kinda want sword and magic

Good video but I feel France deserves recognition for the Renault FT or Britain for the Centurion being the first MBT a little before the Soviets introduced the T-54/55 (the latter being built as a tank for for the cold war and potential nuclear conditions as they were intended to keep crews safe from fallout.) Good video, but the MAUS and Ratte took up screen time that should have gone to good and influential tanks that were actually used, or even "The Panzer IV, III AND V, as iconic weapons that you had a chance to see more than once in a lifetime before the advent of the internet." Im subscribing though, this is enjoyable content.

Shame they didn't mention French tanks as the Renault FT changed the conception of tanks for the end of WW1 and WW2. For those wondering it had the 1st turret that could rotate and needed only 2 soldiers to operate. It is considered as the 1st "modern" tank Or the FCM 2C that needed 13 soldiers to operate but was a slow monster

@X13565

9 ай бұрын

They didnt even mention the french as tank makers XD, so sad...

5:05 T-34 really just said "siuuu" 💀💀💀

@NascarF1_driver

2 ай бұрын

Now I can’t unhear it💀💀💀💀

@get2da_chappa

2 ай бұрын

i hear the loud moaning meme 😭

5:55 sure it can bitch slap mines, but it can also become a warcrime device when your out of ammo :)

3:59 damn they’re being perfectly honest about it

3:55 The reason why Japan and Italy were not good at building tank was that they were facing different enemies. In the 1930s and before WW2, both Japan and Italy were against relatively weaker countries. In the 1930s, Japan was against Chinese who did not have enough explosives or tanks to destroy Japanese tanks. Italy was against Ethiopian who also did not have enough explosives or tanks to destroy Italian tanks. Because of these, both countries did not feel the necessity to build more durable and powerful tanks because their light tanks were enough to against pre-WW2 enemies. While, the UK, US, USSR, and Germany had to build more durable and powerful tanks to defeat powerful enemies who were euqal foe each other. Moreover, there were some limitations in production, and engineering. Major powerful countries of WW2 had enough production capacity and engineering. While, Japan were lack at production capacity and engineering, and Italy was lack at production capacity.

@ryanw531

9 ай бұрын

To also follow up Italy was expecting combat in mountain terrain(but ended up in the desert) and the Japanese were fighting in island jungle thus lightweight/easy to maneuver tanks made more sense than heavy armored tanks, also the Japanese was aiming for a naval victory thus Battleships Aircraft Carriers and Torpedoes were prioritized over tanks.

@aidenm9510

9 ай бұрын

Plus the Japanese tanks usually were required to be able to perform amphibious landings or at least brought on shore by a smaller landing craft, which limited their weight and therefore armor and gun caliber

@patrickwoodruff8881

9 ай бұрын

japan just had bad tank designs lol

@LanderKoenig

9 ай бұрын

Makes sense, explains a lot

@civilengineer3349

9 ай бұрын

Japan was building ships so they couldnt build as much tanks

Awesome video and I loved the humor👌🏽 I would like to add that A) I would also like to see a game with these kind of animations and B) that there were certainly more facts you couldve mentioned, like the french and their efforts (they certainly contributed with the Renault FT 17 which I believe even the U.S. used as well)

Анимация классная, но оценочные суждения можно было бы и не вставлять. А вообще странно что про те же КВ, ИС или Черчилли не упомянули. Хотя тогда наверное видео было бы сильно длиннее.

@_the_ewil_7236

Ай бұрын

Да просто автор занял прохохлятскую позицию, вот и всё - это заметно по некоторым его роликам 😌

It's disgraceful they didn't mention the most powerful tank of WW2, the Bob Semple.

@liliankeong

9 ай бұрын

Viva le France

@dylanmoore3201

9 ай бұрын

Me attempting to find the funny

@humanperson9443

9 ай бұрын

Made of the strongest armor and weapons

@johngellare3507

9 ай бұрын

It's armor looked like simple corrugated iron, but was actually made of a secret material known as New-Zealandium!

@Akin_channel

9 ай бұрын

The main gun could kill any human, and it was equipped with many of them. That's horrible😱

2:20 Standing in a line of fire 32 will lead the way Coming over the trench and wire Going through endless grey 4:14 We are the Panzer Elite Born to compete Never retreat 5:00 Into the Motherland the German Army marched Comrades stand side by side to stop the Nazi charge 7:30 Death in the shape of Panzer Battallion Insect of terror, don't run Face your fate like a man

@johillholy8582

9 ай бұрын

Sabaton 😎😎😎

@canadaballplayz9999

9 ай бұрын

SABATON!

@williamdavis2960

9 ай бұрын

Ah, a man of culture.

@szaboaron8966

9 ай бұрын

Basically the entire video: Steel commanders rule the battlefield

@alexander97611

9 ай бұрын

@@szaboaron8966spearhead flanders, tankers leading the storm of panzers

8:16 I mean, we still call our air force "Luftwaffe".

Забавно смотреть на нахваливание леопардов и изображение наших танков "мусором"

@xexz2745

6 ай бұрын

Хотя не один десяток уже лепиков и другой натовской шушары подбито

@Mets2015WorldSeries

5 ай бұрын

You mean the ones who aren’t even in theater yet?

@user-no6bx2kv2n

Ай бұрын

​@@Mets2015WorldSeries В музей на Кубинке уже притащили Леопард-2 и Абрамс. Ну и остальные бронегробы тоже

@jayzandstra1830

22 күн бұрын

when your t80bvm gets turret tossed because a drone flies against the back of the turret then it quite so a shitty tank my friend,crew survivability is very questionable but why care about that when you got millions of men comrade))

@user-no6bx2kv2n

22 күн бұрын

​@@jayzandstra1830Ок. То, что от прямого попадания башня Абрамса осталось на месте поможет его экипажу? Какая разница? Экипаж все равно погиб. Как минимум в башне Разница в том, что в российском танке есть автомат заряжания, а в супер современных натовских танках негр Джимми. И поэтому за раз в танке РФ народу гибнет меньше. И да. Может быть 1 Абрамсы лучше одного Т80 или т90. Но количество - это самое главное качество

"Wonder how the Leopards are doing" Let me give you a demonstration Landmine: Kaboom? Russians: Yes Rico, Kaboom

@orionSpacecraft

9 ай бұрын

Not to mention that Ukraine also uses Russian tanks so it’s not the tank that is performing poorly…

Not every German tank was over-engineered and produced in small numbers. The StuGIII was the most produced German tank because it was very cheap and efficient. The reason why German tanks kept getting bigger was, that initially this strategy was very successful. The Tiger 1 was the first heavy tank and had no opponents. But at a certain point, size becomes a disadvantage. So this strategy didn't work anymore. If you compare numbers then you also have to consider the economic strength of the countries.

@Kingfisher_2376

9 ай бұрын

Minor Correction: Heavy tanks like the Tiger never technically stopped working, so much as they became tactically redundant decades later. The US and USSR both adopted version of their own during the Cold War. Germany's issues during WW2 largely stem from its resource poverty. It never had the fuel reserves to function as a modern mechanized army in the way that the US, UK and USSR did. So, I guess they kinda did stop working, but in a more literal sense than you seem to imply.

@TheNapster153

9 ай бұрын

​@@Kingfisher_2376The key to German heavy tanks was reliable logistics and maintenance. A dedicated tank regiment with excellent radio based coordination and proper support was expected to punch through the enemy lines and wreak havoc whilst mechanised and motorised troops followed up. This is a doctrine that is still used to this day, but what Germany suffered in WW2 was the horrible state of their logistics. Not only they had sabotaged production lines and faulty supply points, their comms were also tapped in late war meaning that any and all moves they made were known to their enemies. Also, the lost of air power was one of the biggest damnings to happen to them. With the threat of getting annihilated from above, german armour was unable to play any active roles during daytime and had to move under the cover of darkness. The last bit may also be where the term 'Army of the Night' became popularised from.

@generalhorse493

9 ай бұрын

The Tiger 1 was a good heavy tank but it was too heavy and over engineered compared the sherman or t34. Plus, as early as Kursk the Soviets had devised ways to kill or disable Tigers. Anti tank trenches, anti tank mines, new Ptab anti tank bomblets dropped by Il-2s, and positioning t34s, anti tank guns and spgs into positions where they could shoot Tigers in the much thinner side or rear armor. Also, don't forget that after Kursk things like the Sherman firefly, Sherman 76, M36 jackson, Su-85, Su-100, Isu-122 and Is-2s started rolling onto the battlefield. Also also, the germans forgot to provide enough recovery vehicles in the event a tiger was disabled or broke down.

@rgelioredeker3374

9 ай бұрын

Bastante errónea tu información, es sabido que en EEUU y Europa están borrando la historia pero te aviso que el Tiger I no fue el primer tanque pesado, fuera de modelos prototipos, el primero en producirse en números decentes fueron los modelos KV rusos, los cuales para inicio de Barbarroja no tenían rival y solo un cañón antitanque de 88 o un bombardero eran capaces de neutralizarlos (La película estadounidense "Fury", esta basada en la historia real de como un solitario KV-1 fue capaz de frenar toda una división panzer por su cuenta y tras destruir todos los cañones de 88 que los alemanes poseían, fue destruido junto con su tripulación por unidades de granaderos) y el Tiger I fue la respuesta a los KV 1 y 2 soviéticos.

@taistelusammakko5088

9 ай бұрын

​@@generalhorse493the tiger wasnt t 34 or m4 sherman. It had a designated role as a breakthrough tank, such as no medium tank wouldnt be enough to replace it

Great video! You got yourself a new subscriber, it's the least I can do. Keep up the great work!! 🙌🏻

Very cool animation, but you totally forgot the Renault FT-17. As a french it broke my heart

Best animation studio I have watched in a long while.

@KungFuWizardOfJesus

9 ай бұрын

@@jzsbff4801 fully agree

@illegalisntlegal

9 ай бұрын

​@jzsbff4801 I love how they just slapped the swastika right in your face not giving any craps about demonitization

It's a shame that not a single French tank has been mentioned, not even the FT 17 which is the father of French tanks

@leprianto4930

9 ай бұрын

It's not the father of French tanks in fact there was other before it but it is the father of modern tanks with a 360° turret and an engine in the back but you are right tho there should have been at least one French tanks since they were some of the biggest designer of those

6:17 Mario shy guy sound

Как как поведут Леопарды и Абрамсы? Так же отлично горят.

@user-hk1qn9ue2t

Ай бұрын

Ну, не показывать же это в пропагандистском ролике...

4:46 my guy was poppin' wheelies while in tank while dunkin' on Germans 😂😂😂😂

5:56 “you had a crab Sherman used to bitch slap mines into the air” 😂😂😂😂

Little Willy was a development vehicle to demonstrate the concept. It was never intended for service, simply to display the characteristics to be incorporated in future fighting vehicles...

Fun fact. The name tank was supposed to be only a cover for the first tanks. Many of the soldiers who saw them covered assumed they were water tanks and that’s what command stuck with. It could have been anything. Maybe it could have been called “big metal box with guns that may or may not break down or explode”.

-3 abrams

@user-hk1qn9ue2t

Ай бұрын

4

@user-sl9fy8ug2h

28 күн бұрын

​@@user-hk1qn9ue2t, 6

@user-ic1ng7xl6t

Күн бұрын

5

Now that we had tanks, maybe the evolution of battleships ? xD With like the ships of the line at the start, then the monitors, dreadnoughts etc... And finally to finish with the Iowa and Yamato :3 It would be interesting I think ^^ And great video of course, as always ^^

@amhuman5138

9 ай бұрын

Heck, it could even cover the Iowa's conversion, and potentially some of the future concepts of a 'battleship' (I.e a bigass ship containing hundreds of VLS launchers)

@debilus7921

9 ай бұрын

@@amhuman5138 Ah yeah, didn't thought about the future of battleships (and why it has been raplaced by aircraft carrier too ^^')

@amhuman5138

9 ай бұрын

@@debilus7921Yeah, that's a good one too.

@mrpoyo7968

9 ай бұрын

​@@amhuman5138either that or they gonna use railguns when they become available

You can probably Barbarossa your way out of there 5:16 BEST LINE XD

8:11 That aged well didnt it

@bigman6424

7 ай бұрын

It did, because as everyone know tanks aren't indestructible!

@user-co3uc8vt7e

7 ай бұрын

​@@bigman6424 Your "everyone" doesn't include Ukrainian TV target audience that is being fed with tall tales about GAYM CHAYNGER Western wunderwaffe.

@derekschoots

2 ай бұрын

Russia has lost more than 2500 tanks.

@DShawWIU

2 ай бұрын

@@derekschoots and its the 1st genuine peer fight since the Korean war. whats ur point? I'm sure if the NK/Chinese had ATGMs they'd have used them.

@derekschoots

2 ай бұрын

I assumed your comment was a reference to the handful of leopards knocked out in Ukraine.@@DShawWIU

Thanks for talking about that Panther tank. When I heard that the first time I had to do a double take and make sure I didn't accidentally time travel.

@phartbay327

4 ай бұрын

Sorry, we ran out of Big Cat names

8:20 lmao

Didn't expect that splat at 2:27 . Brutal

“…and the crab Sherman, used to bitch-slap mines into the air!” I fucking love this channel lmao

I love how the way the tanks act like they have a mind of their own

I absolutely adore the animation style and the writing for this. Streamlined and adult to keep my attention

You forgot to tell about french tanks who introduced a lot of new technologie before the WWII, like during the great war with the renault ft 17, it was far more eficient than other tanks, to big and slow, and the b1 bis who were facing easely german tanks at the begining of WWII, the only problem were the use of and the sabotage in production.

@haydentenno6773

9 ай бұрын

they will never do that XD this channel is part of the stupid french-bashing clan ... they just act like they're an history channel lol

@vilks887

8 ай бұрын

Indeed

"To bitch slap land mines into the air" had me rollin' 💀💀💀

First time viewer, long time tank fan; it’s honestly amazing how they’re able to get CG to look almost exactly like filmed claymation

The Bob Semple Tank would be a interesting variant too. Great video!

They showed a 'V' engine going into a Sherman, that made me chuckle. There was a reason it was tall...

@user-ht6rz4vw6z

Ай бұрын

radial engine

3:54 Japan: Type 3 chi-nu, Type 3 chi-ha, Italy: P26, M40, AB41 (not a tank but decent armoured car)

With the effort of animation and content put into every single video. This channel is so much way underrated and deserves so much more

¡Gracias!

@mitsistudio

9 ай бұрын

Awesome!!!

@_the_ewil_7236

Ай бұрын

Khohol?

8:04 Tbh, Rocket Launchers cannot even defeat a T-90, because of modern tactical armor, modern anti-rocket system (red lights), and many many other things, and I won't want to act like a Russian Patriot or a guy who says Z at every ukraine video, i mean, that russian engineers is not that badass that drinks vodka every second because of stereotypes, as example - T-72 (Old Soviet Tank) were from 2nd Tank Century, and Abrams from 3rd Tank Century was defeated by Soviet Tank, i know, that this video created for education motives, but some people dont like the thing, some of these things were come from stereotypes.

@iachelovek-ib8rw

7 ай бұрын

I agree, they don't drink vodka there, they drink technical alcohol there 😂

@prostoigor6851

4 ай бұрын

​@@iachelovek-ib8rw Nothing, just a few obscene words... Well, okay, a lot of obscene words and everything will be fine.

@Russki_improvizator

3 ай бұрын

Друг, я из России и я тебе говорю с полной ответственностью, в моей стране самые тупые инженеры и если у них каким то чудом получается сделать что то нормально, в процессе завершения они наверняка поставят туда какую-то хрень которая поломает всю концепцию, ЗАПОМНИТЕ РАЗ И НАВСЕГДА ЕСЛИ ЧТО ТЫ ДЕЛАЮТ В РОССИИ ЭТО НА 100 ПРОЦЕНТОВ ПОЛНАЯ ФИГНЯ, НЕ ВЕРЬТЕ ПРОПАГАНДЕ.

the fact this without swears and adult jokes its actually really good educational contend

6:57: That thing looks like it can wreck a giant.

Forgot to mention the FT-17, the first tank with a rotating turret

@Thekiwibirds1998

9 ай бұрын

Ikr

Fun fact about modern abrams for those that dont know. It shoots depleted uranium darts at high speeds to kill tanks. Its got 3 seperatly targeting extra machine guns that got 360 view. It also uses a Jet engine for a motor. Chugs gas but it burns any combustible liquid. Weighs up to 68 tones and uses very little steel as its armor. Called chabham armor. Some of the toughest tanks in the world. Latest model :M1A2C abrams

Хочется сказать, что у а-40 (летающий танк) снаряды были. Вся его проблема заключалась в том, что его было проблематично доставлять на поле боя

i love these animations there so well put together i remember when How Countries Fight Their Wars popped up in my recommended 3 years ago I'm happy to see more animations being uploaded again there pure gold and the commentary tops it off

I can’t help but adore this duo at 1:53 They’re so funny))

I love this Studio so much because of how quick it pumps out new content we get to love and enjoy 🙏🙏🙏

@itsamefroggie

9 ай бұрын

"quick" lol (not that I have a problem with a video a month)

@magical_dioxide7948

9 ай бұрын

@@itsamefroggie yeah its not quick at all but the animation and research done for the videos aswell as how long they are is well worth the wait👍

Wanted to see the merkava, but in fairness, there are surprisingly alot of different tank variations now. Swedish tanks are pretty impressive too. Primarily tank destroyers. They take on a unique design compared to most other tanks.

@tylparys

3 ай бұрын

Strv 103 are Main Battle Tanks, not tank destroyers.

01:36: it was actually an Australian who proposed the original tank, multiple times, the leadership were like 'nup' until they borrowed the concepts (which they to pay compensation for)

@TC1YT

2 ай бұрын

U mean Austrian?

@betula2137

2 ай бұрын

@@TC1YT No I mean Australian. After all, we had plenty of inspiration with emus 'n all

Seeing that it is coming out soon got me really excited cause of the top quality animation you guys do keep up the work

I’m disappointed the French tanks aren’t portrayed when they was innovative and effectives the FT17 literally created the true design of tanks and ww2 French tanks where also the best of their time ( but they had problems of doctrines and high commands )

@stephen4121

9 ай бұрын

Yup not sure how France wasn't one of the main tank producing nations. They certainly produced more and more capable tanks than the Japanese or Italians that's for certain. The Chars were impressive tanks, just sadly the French army was stuck in WW1 mode.

@manofironthathasntturnedcr9817

9 ай бұрын

@@stephen4121 France had a pretty big anti war sentiment during the interwar. So why would we have produced massive quantitities of tank that we wouldn’t have needed in an ideal world ? And by the time we realised we needed more tanks, it was too late anyway. One of said chars, the B1-bis had been in development since 1920. Very much stuck as a WW1 type of design. And intended to be used in a trench war scenario. It was still a nightmare for every german unlucky enough to encounter one during the short lived conflict. The only counter for the B1-bis the german had at the during the rather short war against my country was the 88mm anti air gun, whose effectiveness as an anti tank weapon was only discovered by pure accident. Probably a gun crew saw a B1 approaching, panicked, pointed the gun at the tank in desperation and fired. In terms of effectiveness, think about this: At one point, a single B1 tore apart a small german armored column. 13 tanks destroyed in a single engagement. And not a single penetrating german shot out of the dozens that hit the aforementioned B1. They were so good the germans salvaged the ones they could, and stuck a flamethrower where the 75mm was. You know, for extra nastiness. And then threw those at the soviets. To quote a comic about it, it was a « slug with enough armour to pass as a swiss safe, and with sharp teeth ». Comic is named « The butcher of Stonne », if you are interested.

@VegasFan3000

9 ай бұрын

@@manofironthathasntturnedcr9817 B1 Bis wasn't developped in 1920'. The "Char de Bataille" trials was in 1924, and the B1 was develloped from its contestants in the beginning of the 30', it wasn't made to reach trenches, but instead to assault fortifications like the Siegfried line and to be used as support for the Maginot Line guns.

@VegasFan3000

9 ай бұрын

France also producted more than 1000 infantry tank in 1940 and 500 cavalry tanks, along side many armored cars

5:30 'you see Ivan,when the tank is flying, the enemy is confused whether to shoot anti tank or anti aircraft gun.'

@mieszkov978

Ай бұрын

Meanwhile, the German 8.8 cm anti-aircraft gun which was also used for ground targets:

Mitsi Studio. They make War look like a little kid's game and I freakin lovenit

"We would see leopard 2 perform"💀 You mean graveyard for 4 Mykolas?

@tankenjoyer9175

Ай бұрын

man its biased asf, abrams are burning in ukraine rn