I often play videos from this channel nice and loud so anyone in ear shot can hear. It has lit a spark of curiosity in many ppl doing this technique lol

I think the Intelligent Design angle that you’ve touched on is important for believers to explore and it should be celebrated...

Genesis IS history.

@phylvalen9991

4 ай бұрын

Absolutely true, listen to the video 'Is Genesis History' it's fascinating 🙏

@fohrum4757

4 ай бұрын

Yeah if you like fairy tales I guess. It's about as much history as the Qur'an is lol

@freedominion7369

4 ай бұрын

​@@fohrum4757 1) We're not talking about myths created by mankind; we're talking about God who created humanity, nature and the cosmos 2) Please disprove God 3) Agreed that Islam is a fraudulent theology

@fohrum4757

4 ай бұрын

@@freedominion7369 I don't need to prove a god. You can't just offer up an idea and say "Ha you can't prove it, therefore it's real." Doesn't work that way. If you can't prove god, then I don't need to disprove it.

@bobwehadababyitsaboi103

4 ай бұрын

​@fohrum4757 The only fairy around here is you and the tale is optional.

Explanation of how every species evolved with a face and everything situated in the same basic position is also inexplicable. Nose, eyes, ears, mouth set in similar positions. With similar functions.

@OnASeasideMission

4 ай бұрын

Absolutely. It makes no sense that sensory organs should be clustered in the same region as the central nervous system, minimising time needed to process information and bite something else's head off. 🙄

@RoseSharon7777

4 ай бұрын

@@OnASeasideMission That's would mean DNA is the divine intelligent designer.

@OnASeasideMission

4 ай бұрын

Simple. Just admit that there's no need for a divine intelligent designer.

@steveOCalley

3 ай бұрын

Inexplicable? No, very explainable. First, vertebrates are bilaterally symmetrical, and the face and the special sensory organs develop from the branchial arches, the specific organ coming from the same arch in all species with that organ. You can still insist on intelligent design and study mammalian development.

@TheAnePink

2 ай бұрын

​@@steveOCalley And all that comes from information, which needs programming and no random chance could ever do that.

Awesomw job.

This is truly a pause, and think, desecting, be amazed at creation and author.

It just occurred to me that the use of the term "conventional paradigm" is mistaken. The conventional paradigm was creation. Evolution is the Atheist Paradigm.

@billcook4768

4 ай бұрын

Evolution and God are not in conflict. You can believe in evolution and in God.

@Sawyersmaple

4 ай бұрын

Sorry but No! Evolution and God do not mix. God is so powerful that all he did to creat everything, was to speak it and it was so. God using evolution is not compatible with the New Testament, where God Heald people instantly and raised Lazerous from the dead instantly. A god that has to use evolution to creat is a pathetic god indeed. I’ll trust My God who said he created everything in 6, 24 hour days.

@billcook4768

4 ай бұрын

@@Sawyersmaple You may want to study the Bible a bit more, as Jesus didn’t always heal instantly

@hobodude

21 күн бұрын

@@billcook4768 Incorrect. Paul states there was no death before the fall. Evolution requires death. Also, Christ can’t be the New Adam if the old Adam never existed or wasn’t created exactly as he was.

@billcook4768

21 күн бұрын

@@hobodude It depends upon whether you allow Paul to speak metaphorically, or insist he must be taken literally. Too many Christians (IMO) remind me of Nicodemus, who thought Jesus must be literal when he talked about being “born again”. How can a man return to his mother’s womb?

Dissect any animal, human fish or plant even soil and a billion trillion years could not evolve them all at the same time at the same rate to all be present on the earth all together at the same point in history. Everything is such an INTELLIGENT design by our Creator. Praise God.

Okay a question for this channel I watched the full video on is Genesis history and I think they mentioned that the earth was trying to heal itself can anyone elaborate more please?

@TheMichealFHansen

3 ай бұрын

It says in Romans 8 that Creation is groaning, awaiting the redemption of humanity. Ever since the initial curse because of Adam and Eve’s sin has the earth needed healing. That PLUS (and I think this is more likely what they were referring to), healing to this very day from the cataclysmic events of the Genesis flood. I sort of doubt most of us understand how traumatic that event was for this planet and Creation. Hope that helps!

So Awesome!!! Like and Share

1:18 swimming fast in my opinion is far harder than flying. Look at how difficult it is to make a boat go 60 miles an hour and that's on top of the water. But you've got fish that are swimming 65 mph in the water which is thousand times thicker than the air. A little kid can hold some silk sheets in the right manner on a really windy day and get a loft for a small amount of time That kid is never just going to take a bed sheet and go 60 mi an hour under the water So if you want to talk an amazing evolution. Or creation or whatever... Sailfish not birds

@projectdesign4675

3 ай бұрын

excellent comment.........but study the dragon fly too.......a hummingbird (mathematically) is 50 times more genius than any modern plane! The oceanic creation, yes, is beyond amazing

In birds the ability to fly is one fascinating story. The other is ability to reproduce by eggs 🥚. Thickness of the shell: if too thin it will crack in the incubation process. If too thick it'll be impossible for the chick to exit. The content of the egg 🥚 change into a bird 🐦. Butterflies have four stages of development: egg, caterpillar, puppa and butterfly. The egg has in both species to be in the perfectly right condition to produce the mature animal or else it just would go extinct in one generation.

@danieljosephdelta44semperfi

3 ай бұрын

Wow, yes, brilliant

Riiiight. They say that flight has to be created as a whole package .... then they talk about all the gliding animals. They say that two different birds came from the same created kind, which would require more evolution than there was time for.

Anything you can attribute a purpose for was designed.

@sciencerules2825

3 ай бұрын

Merely claiming something has a purpose is not evidence for purposeful design. You have to demonstrate both the design and the purposeful intent

Flight is an amazing thing to demonstrate God's greatness. Just how it is....

Why do antitheist trolls haunt places like this? Ego? Sadism? Boredom? (I don't expect them to be honest. If they were honest, they would not be antitheist.)

@Sawyersmaple

4 ай бұрын

I have started thanking them for coming to Chanel’s like this. And encouraging them to keep coming back, sooner or later the truth will get through to them.

@fohrum4757

4 ай бұрын

Because we don't like pseudoscience, and we don't like how biased believers are. For you to accept every other scientific theory out there, but deny just one of them (evolution) is about the most dishonest thing you can do. And yet you think WE'RE the dishonest ones. You don't even understand how evolution works, but yet you say it doesn't work, because god. Specifically, which mechanism of evolution doesn't work for you to not believe it? You do know the mechanisms of evolution right? I mean, you must know how it works, otherwise you wouldn't think it doesn't work. Surely you're not so dishonest that you wave away evolution before actually understanding what it is 🤔. So, which mechanism of evolution work, and which don't??

@adamzeppelin

4 ай бұрын

Welcome to you my friend. Evolution is not a theory, because it cannot truly be tested to determine legitimacy. Therfore, it is but a hypothesis. A guess. A guess based on assumptions. Assumptions of time, and change over time leading to the change from one kind of animal into a completely different kind of animal... over unimaginable amounts of time. The problem is, there is no direct evidence of a kind of animal evolving into something completely different. The faith required in this belief of macroevolution is similar to those who have faith in the Bible and the Lord our God. If you can accept that reality, that both views require faith, then you have to ask yourself why you are rooted in the faith you have. Have you explored the other side of the argument with humility? Many here, walking with the faith we have in the Bible and the Lord or God, have been taught exactly what you were taught about evolution. If you seek the truth, you have to explore the other argument with some humility. God bless you, and I pray you think about this.

@franzpaul6244

4 ай бұрын

@@fohrum4757 the evolutionist has zero explanation for the origin of information and they conveniently make up terms like punctuated equilibrium to explain away to obvious holes in their theory. the modern naturalist has had at least a century to explain how chemistry becomes biology but still can’t...

@dooglitas

4 ай бұрын

@@fohrum4757 We deny evolution because it's impossible. Evolution doesn't work. There is no mechanism that can account for evolution, no mechanism to produce the vast amounts of highly organized, highly complex new genetic information that would be required for evolution to happen.

❤❤❤❤❤

I think its sliding on the belly behavior evolved.

I find it very refreshing with Todd being so honest. He think God created flight, because it's seem hard to think about several evolutionary processes. It's not the usual God of the gap argument. It's a God of laziness argument!

@davidsinclair47

4 ай бұрын

You lack understanding of the complexity that evolution cannot explain. If you take gliders and say they evolved into birds without explaining how the DNA to develop the musculature for powered flight happened by chance let alone allowed them to be gliders in the first place.

@MrDanAng1

4 ай бұрын

@@davidsinclair47 It's not that hard... for birds, a bigger "wishbone" and muscles are required. For gliding, it would give better control over the glide and thus be selected for. Any mutation that affected either the size of the bone or the muscles would be selected for (or against, if it make them smaller!) The main movement needed for flight was already in place, it was the natural movement of therepod arms. Which is probably the main reason that specifically therapods developed flight, while most other animals didn't.

@mikedavis802

4 ай бұрын

Ugh do the math,

@davidsinclair47

4 ай бұрын

@@mikedavis802 Having done the math and saw the impossibility of even necessary amino acids of the proper handedness to even form

@davidsinclair47

4 ай бұрын

The simplest of proteins and pull together to form the millions of components in even the simplest bacteria let alone the complexity of a bird all by chance better just come to Vegas.

Don't forget teradactyles. The flying serpents described by ancient historians. Your videos, combined with Answers in Genesis, have helped me come to better conclusions than secular science ever could. Anything secular science can't explain, they deny it existed.

Evolution doesn’t explain much. Within species evolution= adaptation, the only evolution that makes sense.

For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse. Romans 1 20 kjv

Evolution. Literally impossible. The non-existence of a creator God, also literally impossible.

@kittykatters3972

4 ай бұрын

Evolution has been empirically observed for centuries. The theory of evolution explains the mechanisms which produced the observed fact of evolution.

@SavedbyGraceAlone1962

4 ай бұрын

@@kittykatters3972 "The theory of evolution explains the fact of evolution".😂😂

@kittykatters3972

4 ай бұрын

@@SavedbyGraceAlone1962 Could your omnipotent God use evolution if he so chose? If so then evolution is not "literally impossible". QED.

@SavedbyGraceAlone1962

4 ай бұрын

@@kittykatters3972 He could but he didn't. Since he didn't, literally impossible. No QED after all.

@kittykatters3972

4 ай бұрын

@@SavedbyGraceAlone1962 Go look up the definition of "impossible". Let us know what you find, K?

Funny how in the last 20 seconds of the video, Todd Wood gave an explanation of how flight could have evolved. He also described animals that glide but don't fly, demonstrating how "half-flight" could be beneficial and why it may have evolved. Also, wings in birds are their arms, showing an evolutionary connection to land-walking animals. A God may have given birds arms, in addition to wings on their back. But evolution had to transform arms into wings because that's what it had to work with.

@dooglitas

4 ай бұрын

You have grossly oversimplified the complexity of flight and how impossible it would be for it to develop by chance, random changes, as would be the case if evolution were true.

@franzpaul6244

4 ай бұрын

improvement is a product of information so where the information comes from in order to achieve an improvement would have to be explained as it could NOT have been a random mutation. assuming that the wings of a eagle are common to the legs of a alligator is laughable...

@franzpaul6244

4 ай бұрын

@@dooglitas they always have to either over simplify or make the explanation so complicated that it sounds like a word salad...

@kittykatters3972

4 ай бұрын

@@franzpaul6244 The random genetic variations which happen in every individual in every generation are new genetic information. The new genetic information added to the gene pool is that which is incorporated by selection and neutral drift. That's how improvements are naturally made.

@kittykatters3972

4 ай бұрын

@@franzpaul6244 When we give you the correct scientific explanation you don't understand it.

Another video which is 100% wrong. There are two competing hypothesis for the origin of flight in birds. One is "ground up" - feathered dinosaurs used their feathered front limbs for balance in running. Eventually they were able to make long gliding leaps to cover more ground which eventually evolved in front wing flapping flight. The other is "tree down". Feathered dinos used their feathered front limbs to make short glides as they hopped down from tree branches. These glides got longer until they evolved into flapping flight. Both hypotheses have some evidence and it's possible both may be true in different lineages of birds.

@IsGenesisHistory

4 ай бұрын

@kittykatters3972 Thank you for sharing your perspective. However, I remain unconvinced that the hypotheses you outlined align with observations in the fossil record. Instances of powered flight in dinosaurs are evidenced in mid-Jurassic fossil deposits, as exemplified by creatures like Anchiornis. Anchiornis stands out as a very bird-like dinosaur (hence its name, which means "near bird"). Yet, this is one of the first bird-like dinosaurs we see in the fossil record. Contrastingly, more "primitive" bird-like dinosaurs exhibiting the "ground up" or "tree-down" behaviors you mentioned (such as Sinornithosaurus) do not show up until later in the fossil record, in Cretaceous fossil deposits. This is why some paleontologists, including Phil Senter, propose the intriguing idea that flightless bird-like dinosaurs, such as Velociraptor, might be secondarily flightless. This means they descended from ancestors that possessed powered flight, as seen in modern birds like the kakapo and the almost-modern dodo bird.

@kittykatters3972

4 ай бұрын

@@IsGenesisHistory You're certainly entitled to your layman's opinion. All of professional paleontology and indeed virtually all of professional science thinks you're wrong. But do tell, if theropod dinosaurs are "secondary flightless" then where did their original flying ancestors come from?

@IsGenesisHistory

3 ай бұрын

@kittykatters3972 𝘈𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘷𝘪𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶'𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘨. Except they really don’t. The existence of a temporal paradox between dinosaurs with powered flight and bird-like dinosaurs they supposedly evolved from has long been acknowledged in the technical literature. Discussion continues on the best way to resolve the temporal paradox. Most paleontologists argue for an early Jurassic ghost lineage during which powered flight evolved in dinosaurs for the first time. Others, like Alan Feduccia and Sankar Chatterjee, argue that birds and bird-like dinosaurs are not actually dinosaurs, but actually evolved from a lineage of crocodile-like archosaurs in the Triassic. This has not been widely accepted by other paleontologists. 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘥𝘰 𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘭, 𝘪𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘰𝘥 𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘰𝘴𝘢𝘶𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 "𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘧𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴" 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘧𝘭𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮? A very good question. Here is one possible answer we should carefully consider: "So God created the great sea creatures and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarm, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good." - Genesis 1:21.

@DC-_-

2 ай бұрын

People who believe and follow the acceoted scientific theory are people who 1: have 0 factual proof of their hypothesis, and 2: are anti intelligent creator, thus in order to propose a theory, they are doing so through an opinionated lense. But people wrongly assume these accepted hypothesis contain factual proven scientific data. 1. Radio dating for billions of year time scale us so full of holes, that it contains enough information equivalent to a cooking strainers ability to hold a liquid. 2: evolution also contains absolutely no factual scientific proof, 100% of all known life samples are found in a 100% completed complex form. There's nothing factual about modern science in the area of old earth and evolution, what modern science is, is actually an atheist religious view and is how all data recieved is interpreted through. Again, no factual proof

So at 2.07 he says " for me its easier to explain if god created the flying things ". !!! You could simplify everything with that argument. Luckily we have had generations of brilliant scientists who have given us the answer to almost all of lifes mysteries without the lazy option of crediting everything to a non existent creator.

I’m interested in the quality of the discussions by the presenters. I listen and learn, perhaps not as the presenters intended. The archaeological channel is great. The geology, they obtain great samples but misconstrue them. This channel is mis-titled. It doesn’t prove evolution of flight can’t happen. Present the facts on flight, that’s fine. Can you not marvel at the beauty of the birds without thinking of ammunition for a fight?

So, specifically which mechanisms of evolution don't work? Can anyone here explain why wings are impossible to evolve through the mechanisms of evolution? Does anybody here even understand the mechanisms of evolution? I'm guessing nobody here even understands how it works, considering the comments I see.

@dooglitas

4 ай бұрын

Simple. There is no mechanism of evolution. There is no mechanism that can explain the vast amount of new, highly complex, highly ordered genetic information that would be required for evolution to occur. It is impossible for a random process, such as evolution, to produce highly ordered, extremely complex structures and processes. Flight would require thousands of perfectly interworking physiology and anatomy to occur. A wing is extremely complex and requires perfect coordination of many things. Such things cannot develop by chance and random events.

@jeromejacobsen2130

4 ай бұрын

fohrum4757, Is this your understanding of evolution? Briefly, mutations arise in the genetic code, those changes that that are beneficial survive to pass on to the next generation. Those that are not beneficial should not survive. Question 1 - what is the ratio of good vs. bad mutations observed in the world today? Question 2 - what is the rate of good mutations over time needed to account for the variety of life we see today, starting from a presumed initial cell 2 or so billion years ago? Question 3 - on the subject of wings, specifically vertebrate - what is the benefit to the organism of a forelimb that was previously useful for walking or climbing, or catching food changing to something suitable for flying - specifically in the intermediate stages where the evolving forelimb is unsuitable for anything?

@fohrum4757

4 ай бұрын

@@dooglitas So basically you haven't actually looked into it and you're arguing from incredulity. This is nothing new. By the way, there are 5 mechanisms of evolution. You likely can't name a single one without using Google, so it seems weird for you to assert that it's impossible. Maybe study more champ

@fohrum4757

4 ай бұрын

@@jeromejacobsen2130 I'm unsure of the ratio. But I do know the vast majority of mutations are neutral. Neither good or bad. I'm not sure I understand question 3. But basically, selection pressure is why these things happen. It's the environment around the organism that determines what mutations are good. See for example, if an animal is born in a cold environment with a mutation that happens to give it more survivability, this will then pass it's genes on, and over time, a new species will evolve.

@fohrum4757

4 ай бұрын

@@dooglitas But yeah, it's very obvious that you haven't tried to study the very thing you claim is false. See this is the problem. Not only can you not name 1 mechanism of evolution, but you say there are none. Notta. Zero. You could not have made it more painfully obvious that you never even tried to learn about it. It's clear you only listen to people who don't understand it, teach you the material. Does that make sense? Is that honest to you? Would you go to a flat earther to learn about gravity? Would you to to a fast food worker to learn about electricity? No? Then why would you try to learn about evolution from somebody that doesn't even understand it? Pure dishonesty and religious bias is why.

Well, religion sure as hell can't explain the origin of flight either, so...

I think the creationists have this exactly wrong. If all we had was perfect flying creatures, creation might be the easier answer. But we also have hundreds of creatures that fly very badly. We can see in the existing animals all the steps of flight evolving. Creatures that can hop and fly a few feet. Creatures that can fly a little. As mentioned in the video, creatures that glide but don’t have powered flight. Creatures that can use all their power for flight in emergencies, but can’t fly in ordinary circumstances. Creatures that have some of the ingredients of flight, but can’t fly at all. Evolutionary steps laid out for all to see. On the other hand, if we try to explain the world with a Creator, we have to wonder why all they created all these creatures that fly badly. That fly inefficiently. That have feathers and wings but can’t fly at all. Why would an all powerful creator create some things so poorly.

@timwilkins2094

4 ай бұрын

Some people simply refuse to see the obvious. Evolution is impossible.

@diamondguard

4 ай бұрын

The video was not about why creatures with poor flying ability were created, but about why good fliers could not gradually evolve into creatures capable of flying well. All of Creation is about purpose. God creates various beings by sovereign decision, and in the process He creates in the various beings all the information necessary for his unique existence. Every creature created by God is happy or content with what he has received... perhaps only one creation is an exception to this.

@gregoryt8792

4 ай бұрын

Consider - Did you know pictures, tapestries, pottery and stone carvings of sauropods, stegosaurus and other dinosaurs have been found all over the earth which predate the 1840 dinosaur fossil find? Did you also know that the magnetic fields rate of deterioration of the planets has been measured and shown that they cannot last millions of years? Watch - What does soft tissue in dinosaur bones mean for evolution? Dr. Kevin Anderson Secular scientists are misleading you. Or watch - Wheres the evolution? Milk to meat production There are only two possible explanations as to how life arose: Spontaneous generation arising to evolution or a supernatural creative act of God.... There is no other possibility. Spontaneous generation was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others, but that just leaves us with only one other possibility... that life came as a supernatural act of creation by God, but I can't accept that philosophy because I do not want to believe in God. Therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation leading to evolution. George Wald To reiterate, Secular scientists are misleading you. Or consider watching - Origin: Probability of a single protein forming by chance

@truthbebold4009

4 ай бұрын

You weren't there at creation so you really have no legitimate claim to the abilities or non abilities of flying creatures coming fourth from the "hand" of the Creator.

@diamondguard

4 ай бұрын

​@@truthbebold4009 I didn't have to be there at the Creation so that looking at today's Nature as a thinking person I wouldn't have to determine that the probability of Creation by God is about 99.99% and only because we don't use the term "100% probability" in the world of probability calculation. That term has a different name.

The gist of this video: it's all very complex, so......God.

@IsGenesisHistory

4 ай бұрын

@spacecadetmcgee7349 Not exactly. When viewed in isolation from other evidence, the complexities of flight are only evidence against an evolutionary explanation and for an intelligent designer. This is why, in order to argue that the intelligent designer was the God of the Bible, we must incorporate additional evidence from multiple different fields. We do this throughout the hundreds of other videos throughout our channel. See this one as an example: kzread.info/dash/bejne/eWafk8R6icLSfMo.htmlfeature=shared

@kittykatters3972

4 ай бұрын

@@IsGenesisHistory _When viewed in isolation from other evidence_ That's the whole problem with your creation approach. You insist on viewing all evidence in isolation and never consider all the evidence taken as a consilient whole like real science does. It's like looking at one piece of a million piece jigsaw puzzle and claiming you can see the picture. You make up a silly story for each piece of the puzzle separately, in a vacuum, and never look at the big picture formed by all the pieces put together.

@sciencerules2825

4 ай бұрын

@@IsGenesisHistory *When viewed in isolation from other evidence* As soon as you start doing that you stop doing science. One of the great strengths of science is its reliance on a convergence of evidence. Multiple pieces of evidence from multiple independent sources all converge on the same conclusion. Any one piece of evidence may be weak but having dozens of pieces all agree makes it a virtual certainty the conclusion is correct. From Wiki "For example, the theory of evolution is supported by a convergence of evidence from genetics, molecular biology, paleontology, geology, biogeography, comparative anatomy, comparative physiology, and many other fields. In fact, the evidence within each of these fields is itself a convergence providing evidence for the theory. (As a result, to disprove evolution, most or all of these independent lines of evidence would have to be found to be in error.) The strength of the evidence, considered together as a whole, results in the strong scientific consensus that the theory is correct." By demanding each piece of evidence be viewed in isolation from other evidence you are in effect trying to view the entire world through a soda straw. You'll never see the entire thing. Of course since you start with your conclusion maybe that is your goal, to never see the whole thing.

@dataforge2745

3 ай бұрын

​@IsGenesisHistory If "complex, therefore God" is not the argument, then can you explain what is the actual argument? How are you determining that evolution cannot explain flight, if complexity isn't the problem?

Evolution can't really explain anything. It is mythology so.....

First of all, your headline writer is blatantly lying; evolution has no trouble explaining flight. Your scientists agree, they just think creation provides a better explanation. This sort of “lying for God” is both bad science and bad religion.

@vox95831

4 ай бұрын

No wonder Dawkins wrote The Blind Watchmaker. We all know complex watches make themselves when random variation at the DNA level makes watches. Who needs a designer ?

@diamondguard

4 ай бұрын

​@@vox95831 That's right. If we didn't plan ahead, we wouldn't even make it to the door in the morning. :-)

@dooglitas

4 ай бұрын

Evolution does indeed have trouble explaining how flight evolved. Evolutionists just say it happened. There is no explanation given. Flight is highly complex and require engineering to accomplish. It takes more than wings for a creature to fly.

@billcook4768

4 ай бұрын

@@dooglitas That’s simply not true - biologists have long detailed explanations of how flight could come from evolution. They don’t “just say it happened.” I suspect you’ve been listening to creationists make claims about evolution rather than read what evolution is all about. Evolution is an amazing process that can be appreciated by all - whether you believe it is purely natural or guided by a creator. Go read about it from actual scientist and enjoy the amazing world you live in.

@diamondguard

4 ай бұрын

@@dooglitas "It takes more than wings for a creature to fly." Yes it takes more, some meaningful operating information for example. The nature of the unique set of information that operates each living organism is still in the dark for evolutionary scientists. Where does information come from and enter the living cell and its higher-order organizations? Question after question, which will never be answered without accepting God's self-revelation to man.

2:33 so this guy's answer because he's not smart enough to come up with an answer is magic lol I've always thought it was funny that creationists were so against evolution Isn't it more magnificent, that the Lord God is so powerful, he can make one creation that continues to evolve throughout time to be whatever it's needed to be whenever it's needed to be it. That is so much more powerful and amazing than somebody that creates something that is incapable of changing with its environment and therefore goes extinct That's something a human being would conceive of But a god, would conceive of something like evolution where my invention just keeps on being perfect for the environment you move it to... If you ask me evolution proves god more than anything else. Or are you telling me randomly in nature a mechanism was created so that organisms wouldn't go extinct but rather change with the times that tells me that there's some sort of a system of design inherently built into nature itself. How does that not scream god more than anything?

@kittykatters3972

4 ай бұрын

Claiming "God did it by magic!" is always much easier than actually studying and investigating natural phenomena.

@marcusmuse4787

4 ай бұрын

you still can't show us how life magically appeared from nothing at all. lol life from non-life you can't prove, and you come in here and spread your hate and bigotry. While dawkins entertains the idea that aliens created the universe lol anything, but God is responsible for this fine-tuned universe.

@kittykatters3972

4 ай бұрын

@@marcusmuse4787 Neither cosmology nor abiogenesis have anything to do with biological evolution.